Correspondence from Harris to Judge Thompson
Public Court Documents
November 6, 1986

5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Correspondence from Harris to Judge Thompson, 1986. 7b8db1eb-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b1a9564d-aa21-45f7-85b2-6a90ca926606/correspondence-from-harris-to-judge-thompson. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
MOORE, KENDRICK, GLASSROTH, HARRIS, BUsH & WHITE ATTORNEYS AT LAW / RANDOLPH B. MOORE. Ill L. GILBERT KENDRICK 410 SOUTH PERRY STREET STEPHEN R. GLASSROTH PER Tr RICK HARRI JOHN B oh MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36102 TELEPHONE (205) . MICHAEL R. WHITE E (205) 264-9900 November 6, 1986 ‘Honorable Myron Thompson United States District Judge Federal Courthouse Montgomery, Alabama 36014 HAND-DELIVERY RE: Dillard v. Crenshaw County 85-T-1332-N Crenshaw County Segment of Case Dear Judge Thompson: I am in receipt of your November 3 Judgment and Injunction and subsequent Memorandum Opinion in this case. The injunction requires the defendants to conduct a new round of elections for district five of the Crenshaw County Commission before January 1, 1987, to adopt procedures to insure that only registered voters who live in district five are permitted to vote in the election, and to submit to the Court, by November 7, procedures to implement the new requirements. This letter is a response to your order; I am sending a copy to all other counsel of record in this case. I interpret your injunction to be directed at Crenshaw County and to the present members of the Crenshaw County Commission insofar as it requires the adoption and submission of procedures for approval. I represent Crenshaw County and the commission members, and have been instructed to submit the following plan for approval. A. Voter Identification Procedures With respect to procedures for insuring that only eligible district five registered voters are permitted to vote in the election, Crenshaw County proposes a multi-part procedure: 1. Since changing existing beat or precinct lines might confuse voters, might result in voters being unable to find their new polling place, would delay the elections at least » » Honorable Myron Thompson November 6, 1986 Page 2 three months if Alabama law is to be followed, and would require pre-clearance from the Justice Department, the elections will be held at existing polling places for current beats or precincts in which any part of district five is located. Those beats are numbered 3, 5,06, 7,.13, and 14. While the county commission has caused new beat lines to be drawn which will in the future eliminate the possibility of voters crossing district lines, final adoption of the new beat lines (including publication of the new beat lines in the newspaper and a public hearing) will be deferred until after the district five elections in order to reduce confusion. 2. Beat 3 is located entirely within district five and therefore all registered voters in beat 3 will be entitled to vote in the new elections. The county commission, its employees, and such individuals as the commission may hire for this particular task will obtain from the Crenshaw County Board of Registrars a list of registered voters for beats 5, 6,4, 13, and 14. Using (a) personal knowledge, (b) the addresses listed by the Board of Registrars, (c) water department lists, and (d) other county records, the commission will identify the physical location of the homes of as many voters as is possible. The remaining registered voters will be contacted by individuals who will go to their homes and ascertain where each is located. This will primarily be accomplished by following route and box numbers utilized by the postal service. Having located the residences of each registered voter in the affected beats, the commission will compile for each beat a list of registered voters living in district five. 3. Each person registering to vote before the new elections would be identified to his or her proper county commission district by the Board of Registrars, using the same method as is used to determine the beat in which the new voter resides. After registration for each election closes, the Board of Registrars should submit a supplemental list of district five voters by beat to the Circuit Clerk and to the Probate Judge. 4. The lists of district five registered voters will be delivered to the Circuit Clerk for her use in insuring that only eligible voters cast absentee ballots. Another copy of the lists will be delivered to the probate judge's office for distribution to election officials in each beat. While the county commission has no control over the use of these lists Honorable Myron Thompson November 6, 1986 Page 3 once compiled, it is suggested that the lists could be used in each beat as the "check-off sheet" which the poll workers must examine before any voter is entitled to vote. Voters who believe they are entitled to vote in the district five election but whose names do not appear on the lists could be permitted to vote a challenged ballot in the same manner as voters in regular elections under existing Alabama law. B. Election Schedule The Court requires that new elections be held and completed by January 1, 1987. The county commission feels this is undesirable and may prejudice the interests of the plaintiff class in this case. Also, because only fifty-five days remain until the end of the year, certain time limits imposed by Alabama law would need to be severely compromised in order to meet the deadline. Ala. Code 817-4-129 (1975) requires that a list of registered voters entitled to vote in an upcoming primary election shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county on or before the twentieth day preceding the primary. The purpose of the requirement is to allow time for voters to examine the list top insure that voters' names are not inadvertently excluded from it. Since an entirely new list is being compiled for this election, it seems desirable to observe this time limit. Ala. Code 8§17-10-5 (1975) requires that a list of qualified voters be delivered to the absentee election manager (Ann Tate, as Circuit Clerk, is absentee election manager of Crenshaw County) at least forty-five days before a primary election. This requirement was recently amended from the old twenty-one day requirement. While forty-five days may not be necessary for this election, the list does need to be compiled and delivered by a date which will permit ample time for casting of absentee ballots. Between each election, material must be printed, applications for absentee ballots must be received, the ballots must be mailed to the voters, and the ballots must be returned. An insufficient amount of time between elections could result in voters being unable to exercise the right to cast absentee ballots. Alabama law presently uses twenty-one days as the period between primaries and run-offs. Using this amount of time as a guide, the county commission suggests that Honorable Myron Thompson November 6, 1986 Page 4 twenty-one days be allowed between the time the list is delivered and the first primary is held, twenty-one days between the primary and run-off, and another twenty-one days between the run-off and the general election. Ala. Code 8517-16-20 (1975) requires that candidates wishing to qualify for a public office do so at least sixty days before the primary. There is nothing crucial about requiring the full sixty days, although there should be a specific time period provided for the qualification proccess, and that period must be cut off in sufficient time before the primary to allow absentee ballots to be printed, and to allow in turn for the newly-printed ballots to be mailed and returned before the primary election. The county commission suggests that the qualifying period open immediately and close four weeks before the primary. Allowing three weeks between each election and three weeks before the first primary as a period for publishing a list of qualified voters and for casting absentee ballots produces a total of nine weeks, less time than now exists before the new year. More importantly, compiling an accurate list of qualified voters will be a time-consuming task, and that is a task which must be completed before absentee ballots in the first primary may be cast. The county commission believes that five to six weeks may be necessary in order to develop this list. Locating registered voters who are unknown to the county commission and whose mailing addresses give only route and box numbers will be a labor-intensive job. Ample time should be allowed in order to prevent an inaccurate list, which would disenfranchise qualified voters. The commission proposes the following schedule for the new elections: Immediately-- Qualification period opens Immediately -- County commission begins work on new list Immediately-- Voters may apply for absentee ballots % @® Honorable Myron Thompson November 6, 1986 Page 5 December 9, 1986 (Tuesday)-- Qualification period closes December 15, 1986 (Monday)-- Deadline for preparation and delivery of list of qualified voters in district five December 16, 1986 (Tuesday)-- Absentee election period begins January 6, 1987 (Tuesday)-- Primary elections January 19, 1987 (Monday)-- County commissioners elected pursuant to law in recent general election, including district five county commissioner, are seated on normal date as required by law January 27, 1987 (Tuesday)-- Run-off elections February 17, 1987 (Tuesday)-- General election February 20, 1987 (Friday)-- Deadline for certifying results of general election to Secretary of State The county has no control over the process by which the Secretary of State certifies the results of the election. As soon as the certification is received, however, the new district five commissioner could be seated. I hope that you find the proposals to be feasible and desirable, and that you find my comments helpful. Respectfully, 7 bn ¢)- Rick Harris RH/ hos ce: All Counsel of record