Correspondence from Harris to Judge Thompson
Public Court Documents
November 6, 1986
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Correspondence from Harris to Judge Thompson, 1986. 7b8db1eb-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b1a9564d-aa21-45f7-85b2-6a90ca926606/correspondence-from-harris-to-judge-thompson. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
MOORE, KENDRICK, GLASSROTH, HARRIS,
BUsH & WHITE
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
/
RANDOLPH B. MOORE. Ill
L. GILBERT KENDRICK 410 SOUTH PERRY STREET
STEPHEN R. GLASSROTH
PER Tr
RICK HARRI
JOHN B oh
MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36102
TELEPHONE (205) .
MICHAEL R. WHITE
E (205) 264-9900
November 6, 1986
‘Honorable Myron Thompson
United States District Judge
Federal Courthouse
Montgomery, Alabama 36014
HAND-DELIVERY
RE: Dillard v. Crenshaw County
85-T-1332-N
Crenshaw County Segment of Case
Dear Judge Thompson:
I am in receipt of your November 3 Judgment and Injunction
and subsequent Memorandum Opinion in this case. The injunction
requires the defendants to conduct a new round of elections for
district five of the Crenshaw County Commission before January
1, 1987, to adopt procedures to insure that only registered
voters who live in district five are permitted to vote in the
election, and to submit to the Court, by November 7, procedures
to implement the new requirements. This letter is a response to
your order; I am sending a copy to all other counsel of record
in this case.
I interpret your injunction to be directed at Crenshaw
County and to the present members of the Crenshaw County
Commission insofar as it requires the adoption and submission of
procedures for approval. I represent Crenshaw County and the
commission members, and have been instructed to submit the
following plan for approval.
A. Voter Identification Procedures
With respect to procedures for insuring that only eligible
district five registered voters are permitted to vote in the
election, Crenshaw County proposes a multi-part procedure:
1. Since changing existing beat or precinct lines might
confuse voters, might result in voters being unable to find
their new polling place, would delay the elections at least
» »
Honorable Myron Thompson
November 6, 1986
Page 2
three months if Alabama law is to be followed, and would require
pre-clearance from the Justice Department, the elections will be
held at existing polling places for current beats or precincts
in which any part of district five is located. Those beats are
numbered 3, 5,06, 7,.13, and 14. While the county commission
has caused new beat lines to be drawn which will in the future
eliminate the possibility of voters crossing district lines,
final adoption of the new beat lines (including publication of
the new beat lines in the newspaper and a public hearing) will
be deferred until after the district five elections in order to
reduce confusion.
2. Beat 3 is located entirely within district five and
therefore all registered voters in beat 3 will be entitled to
vote in the new elections. The county commission, its
employees, and such individuals as the commission may hire for
this particular task will obtain from the Crenshaw County Board
of Registrars a list of registered voters for beats 5, 6,4, 13,
and 14. Using (a) personal knowledge, (b) the addresses listed
by the Board of Registrars, (c) water department lists, and
(d) other county records, the commission will identify the
physical location of the homes of as many voters as is
possible. The remaining registered voters will be contacted by
individuals who will go to their homes and ascertain where each
is located. This will primarily be accomplished by following
route and box numbers utilized by the postal service. Having
located the residences of each registered voter in the affected
beats, the commission will compile for each beat a list of
registered voters living in district five.
3. Each person registering to vote before the new
elections would be identified to his or her proper county
commission district by the Board of Registrars, using the same
method as is used to determine the beat in which the new voter
resides. After registration for each election closes, the Board
of Registrars should submit a supplemental list of district five
voters by beat to the Circuit Clerk and to the Probate Judge.
4. The lists of district five registered voters will be
delivered to the Circuit Clerk for her use in insuring that only
eligible voters cast absentee ballots. Another copy of the
lists will be delivered to the probate judge's office for
distribution to election officials in each beat. While the
county commission has no control over the use of these lists
Honorable Myron Thompson
November 6, 1986
Page 3
once compiled, it is suggested that the lists could be used in
each beat as the "check-off sheet" which the poll workers must
examine before any voter is entitled to vote. Voters who
believe they are entitled to vote in the district five election
but whose names do not appear on the lists could be permitted to
vote a challenged ballot in the same manner as voters in regular
elections under existing Alabama law.
B. Election Schedule
The Court requires that new elections be held and
completed by January 1, 1987. The county commission feels this
is undesirable and may prejudice the interests of the plaintiff
class in this case. Also, because only fifty-five days remain
until the end of the year, certain time limits imposed by
Alabama law would need to be severely compromised in order to
meet the deadline.
Ala. Code 817-4-129 (1975) requires that a list of
registered voters entitled to vote in an upcoming primary
election shall be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the county on or before the twentieth day
preceding the primary. The purpose of the requirement is to
allow time for voters to examine the list top insure that
voters' names are not inadvertently excluded from it. Since an
entirely new list is being compiled for this election, it seems
desirable to observe this time limit.
Ala. Code 8§17-10-5 (1975) requires that a list of
qualified voters be delivered to the absentee election manager
(Ann Tate, as Circuit Clerk, is absentee election manager of
Crenshaw County) at least forty-five days before a primary
election. This requirement was recently amended from the old
twenty-one day requirement. While forty-five days may not be
necessary for this election, the list does need to be compiled
and delivered by a date which will permit ample time for casting
of absentee ballots. Between each election, material must be
printed, applications for absentee ballots must be received, the
ballots must be mailed to the voters, and the ballots must be
returned. An insufficient amount of time between elections
could result in voters being unable to exercise the right to
cast absentee ballots. Alabama law presently uses twenty-one
days as the period between primaries and run-offs. Using this
amount of time as a guide, the county commission suggests that
Honorable Myron Thompson
November 6, 1986
Page 4
twenty-one days be allowed between the time the list is
delivered and the first primary is held, twenty-one days between
the primary and run-off, and another twenty-one days between the
run-off and the general election.
Ala. Code 8517-16-20 (1975) requires that candidates
wishing to qualify for a public office do so at least sixty days
before the primary. There is nothing crucial about requiring
the full sixty days, although there should be a specific time
period provided for the qualification proccess, and that period
must be cut off in sufficient time before the primary to allow
absentee ballots to be printed, and to allow in turn for the
newly-printed ballots to be mailed and returned before the
primary election. The county commission suggests that the
qualifying period open immediately and close four weeks before
the primary.
Allowing three weeks between each election and three weeks
before the first primary as a period for publishing a list of
qualified voters and for casting absentee ballots produces a
total of nine weeks, less time than now exists before the new
year. More importantly, compiling an accurate list of qualified
voters will be a time-consuming task, and that is a task which
must be completed before absentee ballots in the first primary
may be cast. The county commission believes that five to six
weeks may be necessary in order to develop this list. Locating
registered voters who are unknown to the county commission and
whose mailing addresses give only route and box numbers will be
a labor-intensive job. Ample time should be allowed in order to
prevent an inaccurate list, which would disenfranchise qualified
voters.
The commission proposes the following schedule for the new
elections:
Immediately-- Qualification period
opens
Immediately -- County commission begins
work on new list
Immediately-- Voters may apply for
absentee ballots
% @®
Honorable Myron Thompson
November 6, 1986
Page 5
December 9, 1986 (Tuesday)-- Qualification period
closes
December 15, 1986 (Monday)-- Deadline for preparation
and delivery of list of
qualified voters in
district five
December 16, 1986 (Tuesday)-- Absentee election period
begins
January 6, 1987 (Tuesday)-- Primary elections
January 19, 1987 (Monday)-- County commissioners
elected pursuant to law in
recent general election,
including district five
county commissioner, are
seated on normal date as
required by law
January 27, 1987 (Tuesday)-- Run-off elections
February 17, 1987 (Tuesday)-- General election
February 20, 1987 (Friday)-- Deadline for certifying
results of general
election to Secretary of
State
The county has no control over the process by which the
Secretary of State certifies the results of the election. As
soon as the certification is received, however, the new district
five commissioner could be seated.
I hope that you find the proposals to be feasible and
desirable, and that you find my comments helpful.
Respectfully,
7 bn ¢)-
Rick Harris
RH/ hos
ce: All Counsel of record