The U.S. Supreme Court this week agreed to review the case of a Birmingham, Ala. Negro arrested and sentenced to death…
Press Release
January 12, 1961
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. The U.S. Supreme Court this week agreed to review the case of a Birmingham, Ala. Negro arrested and sentenced to death…, 1961. 7af915e2-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b3942c8f-7792-4c5b-bee9-002ccbcb6969/the-us-supreme-court-this-week-agreed-to-review-the-case-of-a-birmingham-ala-negro-arrested-and-sentenced-to-death. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE a
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE «+ NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS © Sa THURGOOD MARSHALL
President Director-Counsel
January 12, 1961
NEW YORK. -- The U. S. Supreme Court this week agreed to review
the case of a Birmingham, Ala. Negro arrested and sentenced to death on
the charge of "burglary with intent to ravish" a white woman.
The convicted man, Charles Hamilton, was arrested in October, 1956
charged with entering a home with intent to burglarize and to rape an
80 year old white woman.
While the burglary charge was dropped, Hamilton was sentenced to
death for "intent to rape" and has been held in Kilby Prison,
Montgomery, Ala. since April, 1957.
The case was taken to the U. S. Supreme Court by attorneys for the
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund in cooperation with Hamilton's
Alabama lawyers on the ground that Hamilton was denied the services of
an attorney at the preliminary stages of the proceedings. A lawyer was
appointed by the court to defend him several days after he was brought
before the court for arraignment and the entry of plea recorded.
Legal Defense Fund attorneys contend in their petition to the
U. S. Supreme Court that this denied Hamilton "due process of law."
"The right to counsel in cases where the death penalty is involved
is absolute at every stage of the court proceedings following the
indictment of the defendants," the attorneys argue.
They pointed out that the Alabama Supreme Court held last summer
that under local law an accused did have the right to an attorney be-
fore arraignment and entry of plea. However, the court denied
Hamilton's request for a new trial stating that he did not show he was
harmed by the lack of counsel at the arraignment,
The major issue raised by Legal Defense attorneys in behalf of
Ham on is whether the right to counsel at preliminary hearings and
before arraignment in capital cases is absolute or not.
Attorneys in the case are Peter Hall and Orzelie Billingsley of
Birmingham, Ala., and Thurgood Marshall, James M. Nabrit, III and Jack
Greenberg of the Legal Defense Fund staff in New York.
= 30%