Greenberg Statement Asking That Negroes Not Be Denied Access to Negro Publications
Press Release
September 5, 1968
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 5. Greenberg Statement Asking That Negroes Not Be Denied Access to Negro Publications, 1968. a886e6e4-b892-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b4db7830-3bfa-4651-8e0d-9c6b79821929/greenberg-statement-asking-that-negroes-not-be-denied-access-to-negro-publications. Accessed December 05, 2025.
Copied!
144
Yu
if
ead President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel
egal efense lund Jack Greenberg
Director, Public Relations
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Jesse DeVore, Jr.
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487
Statement by Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel,
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.,
10 Columbus Circle, New York City, September 5, 1968,
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) has dis-
patched a strong statement to prison officials in all eleven
southern states urging them to make certain that Negro prisoners
are not denied access to Negro publications.
This recent action by LDF sprang from a decision the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit made in July.
to Ebony and Sepia magazines and the Amsterdam News, all Negro
publications.
In this case (Jackson v, Godwin), the court decided that
"Negro inmates of state or correctional institutions could not
be denied access to magazines and newspapers of reasonable quality
published for a Negro audience."
|
|
A Negro from a Florida prison charged that he was denied access
|
|
|
Further, the court found that "rigid scrutiny must be brought |
to bear on the justifications for encroachments on such rights."
The court recognized that its decisio.: would be of "far reaching
consequences, to both the federal and state prison systems,
particularly in the Fifth Judicial Circuit."
In this, our most recent action, I have informed the prison
officials in the South that LDF has received numerous complaints
from Negro inmates held in correctional institutions of their
respective states, In effect, the complaints were that Negro
newspapers, magazines, and Negro history books were either not
available to prisoners or prohibited as reading material. |
$
We have pointed out that since the Court of Appeals has held
that denial of access to such reading material violates consti-
tutional guarantees of freedom of speech and freedom from racial
discrimination, our request wes that they, the prison officials,
investigate promptly the policies of their prison systems and
make such changes in prevailing practices as are necessary to
assure the availability to Negro inmates of newspapers, maga-
zines, and other publications addressed to a Negro audience.
To date, we have had replies from Alabama, Tennessee, Ar-
kansas, and also Washington, D.C. All except Arkansas, said
their policies complied with the court ruling.
The State Board of Corrections in Arkansas, replied that sub-
scriptions to specific magazines are contributed by community
groups and that they have no voice in these selections.
These replies notwithstanding, LDF cooperating attorneys
throughout the South will continue this investigation. The
prospect is that there will be additional litigation in this
area.
-30-