Lawler v. Alexander Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Public Court Documents
January 1, 1981

Cite this item

Lawler v. Alexander Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

Topic
- Economic Justice
Notable Person
- Jack Greenberg
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 82400f0b-bb9a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 5. Alabama's Jury Selection Statute - Discriminatory Exclusion of Negroes, 1969. 3eada33a-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/22fb7ca7-cdbc-47b4-8b66-017c59757cc6/alabamas-jury-selection-statute-discriminatory-exclusion-of-negroes. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    190 

a President 

Hon. Francis E. Rivers 

PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel 
egal efense und Jack Greenberg 

Director, Public Relations 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Jesse DeVore, Jr. 
NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487 

10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 

January 6, 1969 

md we 

WASHINGTON, D.C.--The U.S. Supreme Court today,asked to rule on 

the constitutionality of Alabama's jurors selection statute. 

In an appeal to the Court by the NAACP Legal Defense and 

Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), Alabama's process of selecting jury 

commissioners and jurors was said to foster "the discriminatory 

exclusion of Negroes." 

The LDF charges that the statutory standard of selection there- 

fore violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. 

Attorney Norman C. Amaker, LDF's first assistant-counsel, civil 

rights said the Supreme Court has yet to rule on the validity of a 

state juror selection standard. 

The LDF earlier appealed a similar case(Turner v. Fouche, December 

15) to the High Court which involved a juror selection standard in 

Georgia. 

=30= 

NOTE: Though the LDF was once a part of the National Association 

for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) it now isa 

separate organization, even though the initials are retained 

in its title. 

Sent ss 

AP 
UP | 

\imes 

Po Sc 

au
l

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Lawler v. Alexander Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Topic

Notable Person

Organization

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in