Appeals Court Hears Defense Fund Attack Teacher Segregation

Press Release
November 5, 1964

Cite this item

Appeals Court Hears Defense Fund Attack Teacher Segregation preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- b4e68266-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 1. Appeals Court Hears Defense Fund Attack Teacher Segregation, 1964. b4e68266-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b79996e9-3906-45a1-91fd-1ee4cf22a7fa/appeals-court-hears-defense-fund-attack-teacher-segregation. Accessed December 04, 2025.

Copied!

    10 Columbus Circle 
New York, N.Y. 10019 
JUdson 6-8397 

NAACP. 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund 
PRESS RELEASE Paes 
President FOR RELEASE Dr. Allan Knight Chalmers Thireda 
Director-Counsel ~ Tack Cocouihexy November 5, 1964 

Associate Counsel nis 
Constance Baker Motley $ 

sa 3 

Z 
APPEALS COURT HEARS 

“DEFENSE FUND ATTACK 
HER SEGREGATION é 
challenging the legality of continued 

h Carolina public schools were argued 
s for the Fourth Circuit here today by 

‘attorneys. 

BALTIMORE, Md.--Two ca 
teacher segregation in 
before the Court of Ajpp 
NAACP Legal Defense Fun 

Both appeals grew out of attempts by North Carolina Negroes..to 
speed the desegregation process in Statesville and Buncombe County. 
Legal Defense Fund lawyers James M, Nabrit III and Derrick A. Bell, 
Jr. presented the arguments today. 

The Legal Defense Fund attorneys have-both specialized in 
school desegregation cases for many years, in addition to their 
efforts to defend peaceful demonstrators, to end segregation in 
hospitals, public facilities, and urban renewal projects and to 
secure the enforcement of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. 

Teacher assignment on the basis of race has been repeatedly 
declared unconstitutional by other Federal Courts. Last spring 
the U.S. Supreme Court upheld this view when it refused to consider 
a similar case from Florida, thus supporting the Legal Defense 
Fund's contention teacher segregation has ill effects on both the 
pupils and their mentors, 

The Statesville and Buncombe County cases are among 93 school 
suits currently on the Legal Defense Fund docket. In each of the 
cases argued today, issues other than teacher segregation were 
considered as well, 

In the Statesville action, Legal Defense Fund lawyers 
challenged a lower court ruling that allowed the school board to 
continue its policy of requiring Negroes to request transfers and 
delaying action on numerous pending requests. This policy includes 
the maintenance of dual school zones, a practice declared un- 
constitutional five times by the Fourth Circuit in the last five 
years, 

In Buncombe County, where token integration is underway as in 
Statesville, the Legal Defense Fund asked the Appeals Court to upset 
a lower court order postponing high school desegregation. Buncombe 
County has no high school for Negroes, who comprise but 24 per cent 
of the school population. 

Negroes of high school age have for years been forced to 
attend a segregated school in Asheville. Legal Defense Fund 
lawyers told the Court that in many instances this assignment : 
involves trips of over 30 miles per day. ; i 

Joining attorneys Nabrit and Bell for the Legal Defense Fund 
were Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg, and Melvyn Zarx of New York; 
and J. LeVonne Chambers, Conrad O, Pearson, €alvin L. Brown, 
Ruben J. Dailey, and Robert L. Harrell, all of North Carolina, 

=30- 

he 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 Ss

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Appeals Court Hears Defense Fund Attack Teacher Segregation

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in