Alexander and Dennis v. AVCO Corporation Brief for Appellees

Public Court Documents
November 19, 1975

Cite this item

Alexander and Dennis v. AVCO Corporation Brief for Appellees preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- e9266d6d-b79a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. Argument on School Segregation Put Off, 1954. f372b8f0-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/93152d6d-f103-4463-a4c1-393fdfcb38ef/argument-on-school-segregation-put-off. Accessed April 06, 2025.

Copied!

    N.A.A.C.P. MBL Derense ano Envcario@. Funo, we. 

107 West 43rd Street, New York 36, N. Y. 

JUDSON 6.8397 

ARGUMENT ON SCHOOL 
SEGREGATION PUT OFF November 22, 1954 

WASHINGTON, Nov. 22 -- The U. S. Supreme Court today postponed 

the scheduled December 6 argument on the decrees implementing the 

May 17 decision outlawing segregation in public schools. 

The postponement was necessary, the Court announced, "in view 

of the absence of the full; Court," 

Justice Robert H. Tackson, who participated in the two previous 

Supreme Court hearings, died October 9 of a heart ailment. President 

Dwight D, Sisenhower on November 8 appointed New York Circuit Judge 

John Marshall Harlan to fill the vacancy but the Senate Judiciary 

Committee put off confirmation of his appointment until after Congress 

convenes in January, 1955, 

-30- 

Contributions are deductible for U. S. Income Tax Purposes

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Alexander and Dennis v. AVCO Corporation Brief for Appellees

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in