Rights Lawyer Calls for HEW Action Against Biased Professional Groups

Press Release
January 21, 1966

Rights Lawyer Calls for HEW Action Against Biased Professional Groups preview

Cite this item

  • Press Releases, Volume 3. Rights Lawyer Calls for HEW Action Against Biased Professional Groups, 1966. 62958fa1-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b8cbe154-04b6-4f7a-a83e-9f90dc8d259c/rights-lawyer-calls-for-hew-action-against-biased-professional-groups. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    10 Columbus Circle 
New York, N.Y. 10019 
JUdson 6-8397 

NAACP 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund 
PRESS RELEASE 

President FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 
Dr. Allan Knight Chalmers Friday, 

el January 21, 1966 
reenberg 

Director-C 
Jack 

RIGHTS LAWYER CALLS FOR HEW ACTION 
AGAINST BIASED PROFESSIONAL GROUPS 

Court Orders Admission of Negro to N.C. Dental Society 

NEW YORK---Jack Greenberg, director-counsel of the NAACP 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., today called for the 

withholding of Federal funds from national, state and local medical 

and dental organizations because of racial discrimination in 

southern medical and dental societies. 

In a telegram to John W. Gardner, secretary of Health, 

Education and Welfare, Mr. Greenberg charged that hundreds of 

medical and dental societies throughout the South exclude Negroes. 

HEW has the authority under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act 

of 1964 to withhold funds from agencies practicing discrimination, 

The telegram followed a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling 

Thursday ordering the admission of a Negro dentist to the North 

Carolina Dental Society. 

The dentist, Dr. Reginald C. Hawkins of Charlotte, through the 

Legal Defense Fund, began court action to gain admission to the 

society in 1960. The case had been pending in the appellate court 

for more than 14 months prior to Thursday's decision. 

The same appellate court in 1963 gave the Legal Defense Fund 

its first victory over hospital segregation when it ruled that 

hospitals receiving Federal funds under the Hi11-Rueon Act could 

not discriminate. The ruling was subsequently upheld by the U. S. 

Supreme Court. 

No Negroes had previously been admitted to the North Carolina 

Dental Society, and a recent report by the Medical Committee for 

Human Rights said only three Negroes had been admitted to local 

medical societies in North Carolina. 

(more) 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 



Rights Lawyer Calls for HEW Action -2- January 21, 1966 
Against Biased Professional Groups 

The Circuit Court held that state and local dental societies, 

although private organizations, are closely involved in 

governmental affairs, and hence are prohibited by the 14th Amend= 

ment from practicing discrimination. 

The ruling came despite repeal by the North Carolina Legis- 

lature of several statutes which involved the dental sockety. Aa 

state government, including one which gave the society power to 

nominate candidates for the State Board of Dental Examiners which 

regulates the practice of dentistry in the state. 

The Legal Defense Fund won a similar ruling in January, 1964, 

when a Federal District Court in Georgia held that professional 

societies which participate in the selection of state officials 

may not discriminate, 

The Georeia court reaffirmed its decision last week after 

discovering that the local. society had not complied with its 

original order. 

However, a HEW spokesman said today that less than 70 Negro 

dentists are presently members of dental societies in southern 

states. 

HEW has granted $700,000 to the American Dental Association, 

parent body of the state societies, for research and training in 

the present fiscal year. 

Similarly, the Medical Committee for Human Rights report 

said that most medical societies in the South deny membership to 

Negro physicians.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top