Correspondence from Rodney to Karlan; Affidavit of Revius O. Ortique, Jr.; of Paul R. Valteau, Jr.; of Israel M. Augustine, Jr.; of Silas Lee, III
Working File
April 26, 1988

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Correspondence from Rodney to Karlan; Affidavit of Revius O. Ortique, Jr.; of Paul R. Valteau, Jr.; of Israel M. Augustine, Jr.; of Silas Lee, III, 1988. 88d9aa2b-f211-ef11-9f8a-6045bddc4804. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b9013887-4117-4e64-a972-f698ad925bb6/correspondence-from-rodney-to-karlan-affidavit-of-revius-o-ortique-jr-of-paul-r-valteau-jr-of-israel-m-augustine-jr-of-silas-lee-iii. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
• MCGLINCHEY, STAFFORD, MINTZ, CELLINI 8c LANG, PC GRAHAM STAFFORD 0940-19871 DERMOT S. McGLINCHEY. SAMUEL LANG DONALD R. MINTZ m DANDO B. CELLINI. D. ANDREW LANG COLVIN G. NORWOOD, JR.. DAVID S. WILLENZIK. FRANK VOELKER, JR. FREDERICK R. CAMPBELL. B. FRANKLIN MARTIN, III. E. FREDRICK PREIS, JR. HENRI WOLBRETTE, III. LEOPOLD Z. SHER WILLIAM V. DALFERES, JR. 111 MICHAEL J. MAGINNIS III MICHAEL T. PULASKI. PETER L. HILBERT, JR. m CONSTANCE CHARLES WILLEMS ERNEST P. GIEGER, JR. PAUL M. BATIZA 111 MICHAEL R. SISTRUNK. THOMAS P. ANZELMOm STEVEN I. KLEIN M (2, SANDRA MILLS FEINGERTS. BENNET S. KOREN RALPH J. ZATZKIS JAMES M. FANTACI GARY E. MERINGER KENNETH H. LABORDE MAUREEN O'CONNOR SULLIVAN SUSAN wHITTINGTON LEIDNER (2, KATHLEEN A. MANNING J. FORREST HINTON KENNETH A. WEISS 121 JOHN GREGORY ODOM JAMES D. MORGAN MICHAEL S. MITCHELL ELWOOD F. CAHILL, JR. MICHAEL S. GUILLORY LANCE S. OSTENDORF JAMES C. CRIGLER, JR. SIDNEY J. HARDY MICHAEL M. NOONAN RICHARD P. RICHTER MARIE A. MOORE VICTORIA KNIGHT McHENRY RUDY J. CERONE DEBRA FISCHMAN COTTRELL ANTHONY ROLLO EVE B. MASINTER TIMOTHY P. HURLEY GENE W. LAFITTE, JR. STEPHEN W. RIDER ROY J. RODNEY, JR. ERIC SHUMAN ARTHUR H. LEITH DAVID L. BARNETT STEPHEN P. BEISER LAURA HOBSON BROWN STEPHANIE M.. LAWRENCE LISA J. MILEY CHRISTOPHER J. AUBERT KATHLEEN K. CHARVET PATRICIA A. CARTEAUX RICHARD B. EHRET MARK M. GLOVEN MAUREEN L. HOGEL ALEXANDER M. McINTYRE, JR. RICHARD M. MOYED LAUREN A. WELCH CARL A. BUTLER SHARON L. GROSS THOMAS P. McALISTER TRUDY RODNEY BENNETTE SUSAN T. BROUSSARD CYNTHIA M. CANADA ROBERT W. MAXWELL KRISTINA B. WEBB FABIO M. FAGGI 131 PAUL A. OBERER 13, PATRICIA L. MANSON CHRISTOPHER C. JOHNSTON DAVID P. BUEHLER MICHAEL J. DE BLANC, JR. BROOKE DUNCAN III KEITH W. McDANIEL CHARLOTTE G. BORDENAVE GERARD J. SONNIER ELISE M. BEAUCHAMP MARJORIE R. ESMAN N. VICTORIA HOLLADAY ANITA T. LECHNER LAWRENCE B. MANDALA SHARON D. SMITH ROY C. BEARD JOE GIARRUSSO, JR. JONATHAN YOUNG .LAW CORPORATION .,BOARD CERTIFIED TAX ATTORNEY .NOT ADMITTED IN LOUISIANA April 26, 1988 FEDERAL EXPRESS Ms. Pamela S. Karlan Legal Defense Fund 99 Hudson Street New York, New York 10013 Re: Ronald Chisom, et al. -vs- Edwin Edwards et al. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit - No. 87-3463 Our Ref: 9931-54-7 Dear Pam: 643 MAGAZINE STREET NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130-3477 MAILING ADDRESS: POST OFFICE BOX 6 0 643 NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70160-0643 (5 04) 586-1200 FAX (5 04) 596-2800 TELEX 584327 CABLE MACSTAM LAKE PROVIDENCE, LA. OFFICE: 405 MORGAN STREET LAKE PROVIDENCE, LA. 71254 (318) 559-1200 FAX (318) 559-0609 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: (504) 596-2766 Enclosed plese find affidavits of Silas Lee, III, Civil Sheriff, Paul Valteau, and former Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal judge, Israel M. Augustine, Jr.. I understand that you have also received the affidavit of Judge Revious Ortiqe from Marc Morial. Although signed, each affidavit is subject to your editing, suggestions and amendment. I will be happy to file the intervention and hope that we can do so before May 1, 1988. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. RJR/jh Encl. Very t uly ou S r Roy Rodney, Jr. AFFIDAVIT BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary, personally came and appeared Revius O. Ortique, Jr. who after being deposed did state the following: 1) I am a member of the Black race. 2) I am and have been, since 1956, a member of the LA State Bar Association, having been admitted to practice in June of that year. Subsequently, I was admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of LA, and U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. In 1964, I was admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court. I attach a copy of my biographical sketch and mark it Exhibit A for identification.. 3) In 1979, I was selected by the Supreme Court of LA to serve as Judge Ad Hoc for the Civil District Court For the Parish of Orleans. After serving in that position for 6 months, I was subsequently elected in a city-wide election for Judge, Div. H, of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Div. H of the Civil District Court is the trial court of general jurisdiction in Orleans Parish, Louisiana. In 1984 I was re-elected Judge,without opposition to a 6 year term ending December 31, 1990. 4) For many months, I have seriously considered running for a position on the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, I have sought that office in the past, without success. I wish to run again. I will run, should the Districts of the State Supreme Court be redrawn in accordance with the desires of the plaintiffs in the case of Ronald Chisom, et. al. v. Edwin W. Edwards, et. al., (currently pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.) I believe that the current composition of the La. Supreme Court district's , effectively prevents any Black candidate from being successful. The district as presently initiated, i.e. the entire metropolitan area of New Orleans, the Parishes of Jefferson, Plaquemines and St. Bernard- is an almost insurmountable barrier to any Black person being elected.The current La. Supreme Court district lines substantially and materially dilute the voting strength of Black Voters in Orleans Parish. The current racial patterns of parishes of Jefferson, St. Bernard, Plaquemines and St. Tammany, when compared with the racial pattern of Orleans Parish, are obviously different. The difference is so disparate, it is virtuallyimpossible for Black citizens of Orleans Parish to have nay viable representation on the highest court of our State. No other district of our Suprem Court requires an election from a constituency nearly as large. On the other hand, I believe that if I am afforded an opportunity to seek this office from a district appropriately and constitutionally drawn, I would be able to raise funds, win endorsements, and secure financial backing, so vital to a successful candidacy. Obviously I would find it much more advantageous to seekoffice from Orleans Parish, serve Orleans Parish voters and successful candidates who happen to be Black. If the lines are constitutionally redrawn, my chances of winning an election would be substantially enhanced. This conviction is based upon my two successful elections as well as my broad endeavors in the New Orleans community. The current district lines substantially and materially dilute the voting strength of the black voters of Orleans Parish. Based on my experience with various city-wide elections in New Orleans before assuming the bench, and in my own three races for election to the bench, that there will be substantially greater difficulties for a candidate of the Black race to secure the financial and political support vital to a successful candidacy. Further, I believe that I will be irreparably harmed if the election for the State Supreme Court now scheduled for Fall 1988 are not postponed until the ultimate disposition of the case of Chisom et. al. v. Edwards et. al. This is because the effective organization of a successful citywide campaign takes at least 9 to 18, months and without adequate time and opportunity to develop and obtain endorsements from political organizations, elected officials, newspapers and other political actors, as well as to raise money, a campaign is not likely to be successful. This is especially so in the case of a non-incumbent. I believe that I am irreparably harmed because the current district lines prevent me from mounting an effective campaign and representing all the people of Orleans Parish. JUDGE REVIUS 0. ORTIQUE, JR. United States of America State of Louisiana Parish of Orleans AFFIDAVIT BEFORE ME, personally came and appeared: PAUL R. VALTEAU, JR. who, after being by me first duly sworn, did depose and say: I am a lifelong resident of New Orleans, Louisiana. I attended Dillard University in pursuit of my undergraduate degree and did graduate in 1969. Subsequently I enrolled at the Loyola University School of Law and received my Juris Doctor in 1972. In 1982 I sought the office of Civil Sheriff for the Parish of Orleans and was successful. However, this was not my earliest, nor only experience with the election process in this part of our state. I am convinced that the only place that a Black candidate has a "fair opportunity" to be elected to public office is in Orleans Parish. I say only "fair" opportunity because I know that it is very difficult for a candidate who happens to be Black to raise money and to secure a broad base of support, even in this parish. I further declare th,;.t it is virtually impossible to elect a Black person who is required to seek office from a multi-parish district. I I am advised that a bill has been introduced in the current session of the Louisiana Legislature which, would create a separate Orleans Parish Supreme Court District. In view of all of the above, I respectfully urge the Court to enjoin the upcoming Supreme Court election until this Court can act or our Louisiana Legislature has acted in keeping with current federal jurisprudence. GtALGR PAUL R. VALTEAU, JR. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988. ftdn a'"W NOTAR PUBLIC United States of America State of Louisiana Parish of Orleans AFFIDAVIT BEFORE ME the undersigned authority, personally came and offered: ISRAEL M. AUGUSTINEL_JR. of the full age, who after being first duly sworn, did depose and say: I am a life-long resident of New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana." I was admitted to the practice of Law in 1952." I was appointed Judge to the Criminal District Court for Orleans Parish; in 1969." I served continuously and uninterruptedly until 1981, when I offered myself for election to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, where I remained on the Court until my voluntary retirement in 1984." I stood for election to the Criminal Court (as an encumbent) in 1970. I was opposed by two (2) persons who were white. At that time the voting population was about evenly split among the races. I was able to capture sixty (60%) percent of the vote. However, it was necessary for me to raise what was for me a large sum of money and I had to campaign vigorously. In 1981 I sought election to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeal. Again it was necessary to organize a major campaign effort. I am able to state unequivocably that but for my election being confined to Orleans Parish, I would not have been successful, solely because of my race. Further, I am convinced that unless a Louisiana Supreme Court District is created for Orleans Parish, it will be impossible for a person of the black race to successfully seek that position. So long as the Supreme Court District in which a black candidate must run, includes Parishes which an overwhelmingly populated by white voters, it is • NOTARY PUBLIC impossible for the black candidate to serve the necessary funding/backing to be elected. Finally, I am conviced that young people, who happen to belong to a minority group should be permitted a "role model", who has successfully aspired to the highest Court of our State. This is impossible, so long as a candidate from Orleans Parish must suffer the consequences of being black and seeking public office in parishes other than Or ans Parish. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THISQ6OLDAY OF APRIL, 1988. AFFIDAVIT STATE OF LOUISIANA PARISH OF ORLEANS BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, personally came and appeared: SILAS LEE, III who, after being deposed did state the following: 1. I am president of Silas Lee and Associates, a public opinion, research and consulting company in New Orleans, Louisiana, and Richmond, Virginia. Silas Lee and Associated are consultants to numerous business, retail and fast food corporations, government agencies, broadcasting stations, newspapers, politicians and banks. The company also publishes numerous studies, polls and commentaries yearly which have appeared in the Times-Picayune, USA Today, The Louisiana Weekly, the Nevada Journal, U.S. News and World Report, Ebony Magazine, CBS Evening News and a host of other publications. 2. I am also a sociology instructor for the Loyola University Upward Bound Program-New Orleans, Louisiana, a member of the National Business League, the National Association of Political Consultants and a court certified expert on the social and economic status of blacks in America and public opinion research. 3. I received my Bachelor of Arts in Political Science/Sociology from Loyola University in New Orleans, and a Master of Science in Urban Studies from' the University of New Orleans. I have published extensive research in Social Stratification and Public Opinion Polls. One of my several associates is Dr. Daniel C. Thompson, Professor Emeritus of Sociology and former Vice-President of Academic Affairs of Dillard University in New Orleans. Dr. Thompson is the author of over 200 articles and six books on various subjects in sociology, economic development and social stratification. 4. The current at large system of electing Louisiana Supreme Court judges dilutes and minimizes the opportunities for blacks to be elected to the Louisiana Supreme Court. The following data is offered in support of this theory. VOTER REGISTRATION BREAKDOWN MARCH 31, 1987 TOTAL WHITE BLACK Orleans 251,359 118,232 131,726 Jefferson 199,534 174,742 23,825 St. Tammany A , 69,965 63,197 23,825 St. Bernard \ 40,086 38,508 1,577 Plaquemines 15,198 11,376 2,825 SOURCE: LOUISIANA ELECTIONS COMMISSIONER The above statistics clearly show that as we move outside of the city of New Orleans, black voter strength is diluted. The rate of black voter participation decreases from 52% in Orleans Parish to 12% in Jefferson, 9% in St. Tammany and 4% in St. Bernard, thus handicapping the possibility for a black candidate to run successfully in the present district. Judicial races are expensive traditionally and have low visibility and low voter interest. Although blacks have run successfully in judicial elections in New Orleans, they continue to encounter financial restraints and low voter interest. A successful judicial campaign in New Orleans may cost more than $100,000. Since most black candidates for judgeship lack the financial resources to underwrite their own campaign, fund raising often becomes an insurmountable obstacle. Also, due to the fact that judicial races receive low media coverage, black candidates with low name recognition have to spend more money for advertising and organization than in other races. Considering the upcoming Louisiana Supreme Court election as an example, a potential black candidate will be faced with the racially skewed voter registration statistics for Metro New Orleans, the need for a estimated campaign budget in excess of $100,000, and realize that their chances for winning is nonexistent. • For all the reasons set forth above and more, I believe that the chances for a black to be elected to the Louisiana Supreme Court under the present district are diluted and minimal at best. 5. The scheduled election for the State Supreme Court in the fall of 1988, will not provide a black candidate adequate opportunities to organize and fund a competitive campaign in this election, and as a result, a black candidate will be denied an opportunity to be elected to this judicial opening for at least ten years. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME, THIS v0-07) DAY OF 1988. NOTARY PUBLIC SILAS LEE, III