Correspondence from Rodney to Karlan; Affidavit of Revius O. Ortique, Jr.; of Paul R. Valteau, Jr.; of Israel M. Augustine, Jr.; of Silas Lee, III
Working File
April 26, 1988
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Correspondence from Rodney to Karlan; Affidavit of Revius O. Ortique, Jr.; of Paul R. Valteau, Jr.; of Israel M. Augustine, Jr.; of Silas Lee, III, 1988. 88d9aa2b-f211-ef11-9f8a-6045bddc4804. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b9013887-4117-4e64-a972-f698ad925bb6/correspondence-from-rodney-to-karlan-affidavit-of-revius-o-ortique-jr-of-paul-r-valteau-jr-of-israel-m-augustine-jr-of-silas-lee-iii. Accessed October 26, 2025.
Copied!
•
MCGLINCHEY, STAFFORD, MINTZ, CELLINI 8c LANG, PC
GRAHAM STAFFORD 0940-19871
DERMOT S. McGLINCHEY.
SAMUEL LANG
DONALD R. MINTZ m
DANDO B. CELLINI.
D. ANDREW LANG
COLVIN G. NORWOOD, JR..
DAVID S. WILLENZIK.
FRANK VOELKER, JR.
FREDERICK R. CAMPBELL.
B. FRANKLIN MARTIN, III.
E. FREDRICK PREIS, JR.
HENRI WOLBRETTE, III.
LEOPOLD Z. SHER
WILLIAM V. DALFERES, JR. 111
MICHAEL J. MAGINNIS III
MICHAEL T. PULASKI.
PETER L. HILBERT, JR. m
CONSTANCE CHARLES WILLEMS
ERNEST P. GIEGER, JR.
PAUL M. BATIZA 111
MICHAEL R. SISTRUNK.
THOMAS P. ANZELMOm
STEVEN I. KLEIN M (2,
SANDRA MILLS FEINGERTS.
BENNET S. KOREN
RALPH J. ZATZKIS
JAMES M. FANTACI
GARY E. MERINGER
KENNETH H. LABORDE
MAUREEN O'CONNOR SULLIVAN
SUSAN wHITTINGTON LEIDNER (2,
KATHLEEN A. MANNING
J. FORREST HINTON
KENNETH A. WEISS 121
JOHN GREGORY ODOM
JAMES D. MORGAN
MICHAEL S. MITCHELL
ELWOOD F. CAHILL, JR.
MICHAEL S. GUILLORY
LANCE S. OSTENDORF
JAMES C. CRIGLER, JR.
SIDNEY J. HARDY
MICHAEL M. NOONAN
RICHARD P. RICHTER
MARIE A. MOORE
VICTORIA KNIGHT McHENRY
RUDY J. CERONE
DEBRA FISCHMAN COTTRELL
ANTHONY ROLLO
EVE B. MASINTER
TIMOTHY P. HURLEY
GENE W. LAFITTE, JR.
STEPHEN W. RIDER
ROY J. RODNEY, JR.
ERIC SHUMAN
ARTHUR H. LEITH
DAVID L. BARNETT
STEPHEN P. BEISER
LAURA HOBSON BROWN
STEPHANIE M.. LAWRENCE
LISA J. MILEY
CHRISTOPHER J. AUBERT
KATHLEEN K. CHARVET
PATRICIA A. CARTEAUX
RICHARD B. EHRET
MARK M. GLOVEN
MAUREEN L. HOGEL
ALEXANDER M. McINTYRE, JR.
RICHARD M. MOYED
LAUREN A. WELCH
CARL A. BUTLER
SHARON L. GROSS
THOMAS P. McALISTER
TRUDY RODNEY BENNETTE
SUSAN T. BROUSSARD
CYNTHIA M. CANADA
ROBERT W. MAXWELL
KRISTINA B. WEBB
FABIO M. FAGGI 131
PAUL A. OBERER 13,
PATRICIA L. MANSON
CHRISTOPHER C. JOHNSTON
DAVID P. BUEHLER
MICHAEL J. DE BLANC, JR.
BROOKE DUNCAN III
KEITH W. McDANIEL
CHARLOTTE G. BORDENAVE
GERARD J. SONNIER
ELISE M. BEAUCHAMP
MARJORIE R. ESMAN
N. VICTORIA HOLLADAY
ANITA T. LECHNER
LAWRENCE B. MANDALA
SHARON D. SMITH
ROY C. BEARD
JOE GIARRUSSO, JR.
JONATHAN YOUNG
.LAW CORPORATION .,BOARD CERTIFIED TAX ATTORNEY .NOT ADMITTED IN LOUISIANA
April 26, 1988
FEDERAL EXPRESS
Ms. Pamela S. Karlan
Legal Defense Fund
99 Hudson Street
New York, New York 10013
Re: Ronald Chisom, et al.
-vs- Edwin Edwards et al.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit - No. 87-3463
Our Ref: 9931-54-7
Dear Pam:
643 MAGAZINE STREET
NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130-3477
MAILING ADDRESS:
POST OFFICE BOX 6 0 643
NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70160-0643
(5 04) 586-1200
FAX
(5 04) 596-2800
TELEX
584327
CABLE
MACSTAM
LAKE PROVIDENCE, LA. OFFICE:
405 MORGAN STREET
LAKE PROVIDENCE, LA. 71254
(318) 559-1200
FAX (318) 559-0609
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER:
(504) 596-2766
Enclosed plese find affidavits of Silas Lee, III, Civil
Sheriff, Paul Valteau, and former Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of
Appeal judge, Israel M. Augustine, Jr.. I understand that you
have also received the affidavit of Judge Revious Ortiqe from
Marc Morial. Although signed, each affidavit is subject to your
editing, suggestions and amendment. I will be happy to file the
intervention and hope that we can do so before May 1, 1988.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
RJR/jh
Encl.
Very t uly ou S r
Roy Rodney, Jr.
AFFIDAVIT
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary, personally came
and appeared Revius O. Ortique, Jr. who after being deposed
did state the following:
1) I am a member of the Black race.
2) I am and have been, since 1956, a member of the LA
State Bar Association, having been admitted to practice
in June of that year. Subsequently, I was admitted to
practice before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of LA, and U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.
In 1964, I was admitted to practice before the United States
Supreme Court. I attach a copy of my biographical sketch
and mark it Exhibit A for identification..
3) In 1979, I was selected by the Supreme Court of LA
to serve as Judge Ad Hoc for the Civil District Court For
the Parish of Orleans. After serving in that position
for 6 months, I was subsequently elected in a city-wide
election for Judge, Div. H, of the Civil District Court
for the Parish of Orleans. Div. H of the Civil District
Court is the trial court of general jurisdiction in Orleans
Parish, Louisiana. In 1984 I was re-elected Judge,without
opposition to a 6 year term ending December 31, 1990.
4) For many months, I have seriously considered running
for a position on the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana,
I have sought that office in the past, without success.
I wish to run again. I will run, should the Districts
of the State Supreme Court be redrawn in accordance with
the desires of the plaintiffs in the case of Ronald Chisom,
et. al. v. Edwin W. Edwards, et. al., (currently pending
in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.)
I believe that the current composition of the La.
Supreme Court district's , effectively prevents any Black
candidate from being successful. The district as presently
initiated, i.e. the entire metropolitan area of New Orleans,
the Parishes of Jefferson, Plaquemines and St. Bernard-
is an almost insurmountable barrier to any Black person
being elected.The current La. Supreme Court district lines
substantially and materially dilute the voting strength
of Black Voters in Orleans Parish. The current racial
patterns of parishes of Jefferson, St. Bernard, Plaquemines
and St. Tammany, when compared with the racial pattern
of Orleans Parish, are obviously different. The difference
is so disparate, it is virtuallyimpossible for Black citizens
of Orleans Parish to have nay viable representation on
the highest court of our State.
No other district of our Suprem Court requires an
election from a constituency nearly as large.
On the other hand, I believe that if I am afforded
an opportunity to seek this office from a district appropriately
and constitutionally drawn, I would be able to raise funds,
win endorsements, and secure financial backing, so vital
to a successful candidacy.
Obviously I would find it much more advantageous to
seekoffice from Orleans Parish, serve Orleans Parish voters
and successful candidates who happen to be Black.
If the lines are constitutionally redrawn, my chances
of winning an election would be substantially enhanced.
This conviction is based upon my two successful elections
as well as my broad endeavors in the New Orleans community.
The current district lines substantially and materially
dilute the voting strength of the black voters of Orleans
Parish. Based on my experience with various city-wide
elections in New Orleans before assuming the bench, and
in my own three races for election to the bench, that there
will be substantially greater difficulties for a candidate
of the Black race to secure the financial and political
support vital to a successful candidacy.
Further, I believe that I will be irreparably harmed
if the election for the State Supreme Court now scheduled
for Fall 1988 are not postponed until the ultimate disposition
of the case of Chisom et. al. v. Edwards et. al. This
is because the effective organization of a successful citywide
campaign takes at least 9 to 18, months and without adequate
time and opportunity to develop and obtain endorsements
from political organizations, elected officials, newspapers
and other political actors, as well as to raise money,
a campaign is not likely to be successful. This is especially
so in the case of a non-incumbent.
I believe that I am irreparably harmed because the
current district lines prevent me from mounting an effective
campaign and representing all the people of Orleans Parish.
JUDGE REVIUS 0. ORTIQUE, JR.
United States of America
State of Louisiana
Parish of Orleans
AFFIDAVIT
BEFORE ME, personally came and appeared:
PAUL R. VALTEAU, JR.
who, after being by me first duly sworn, did depose and say:
I am a lifelong resident of New Orleans, Louisiana. I attended
Dillard University in pursuit of my undergraduate degree and did
graduate in 1969. Subsequently I enrolled at the Loyola University
School of Law and received my Juris Doctor in 1972.
In 1982 I sought the office of Civil Sheriff for the Parish of
Orleans and was successful. However, this was not my earliest, nor
only experience with the election process in this part of our state.
I am convinced that the only place that a Black candidate
has a "fair opportunity" to be elected to public office is in Orleans
Parish. I say only "fair" opportunity because I know that it is very
difficult for a candidate who happens to be Black to raise money and
to secure a broad base of support, even in this parish.
I further declare th,;.t it is virtually impossible to elect a
Black person who is required to seek office from a multi-parish district.
I
I am advised that a bill has been introduced in the current
session of the Louisiana Legislature which, would create a separate
Orleans Parish Supreme Court District.
In view of all of the above, I respectfully urge the Court
to enjoin the upcoming Supreme Court election until this Court can act
or our Louisiana Legislature has acted in keeping with current federal
jurisprudence.
GtALGR
PAUL R. VALTEAU, JR.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME
THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988.
ftdn a'"W NOTAR PUBLIC
United States of America
State of Louisiana
Parish of Orleans
AFFIDAVIT
BEFORE ME the undersigned authority, personally came and
offered:
ISRAEL M. AUGUSTINEL_JR. of the full age, who after being
first duly sworn, did depose and say:
I am a life-long resident of New Orleans, Orleans
Parish, Louisiana."
I was admitted to the practice of Law in 1952."
I was appointed Judge to the Criminal District
Court for Orleans Parish; in 1969."
I served continuously and uninterruptedly until
1981, when I offered myself for election to the Fourth
Circuit Court of Appeal, where I remained on the Court
until my voluntary retirement in 1984."
I stood for election to the Criminal Court (as an
encumbent) in 1970. I was opposed by two (2) persons
who were white. At that time the voting population was
about evenly split among the races. I was able to
capture sixty (60%) percent of the vote. However, it
was necessary for me to raise what was for me a large
sum of money and I had to campaign vigorously. In 1981
I sought election to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeal.
Again it was necessary to organize a major campaign
effort.
I am able to state unequivocably that but for my
election being confined to Orleans Parish, I would not
have been successful, solely because of my race.
Further, I am convinced that unless a Louisiana
Supreme Court District is created for Orleans Parish,
it will be impossible for a person of the black race to
successfully seek that position.
So long as the Supreme Court District in which a
black candidate must run, includes Parishes which an
overwhelmingly populated by white voters, it is
•
NOTARY PUBLIC
impossible for the black candidate to serve the
necessary funding/backing to be elected.
Finally, I am conviced that young people, who
happen to belong to a minority group should be
permitted a "role model", who has successfully aspired
to the highest Court of our State. This is impossible,
so long as a candidate from Orleans Parish must suffer
the consequences of being black and seeking public
office in parishes other than Or ans Parish.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME
THISQ6OLDAY OF APRIL, 1988.
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA
PARISH OF ORLEANS
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, personally came and
appeared:
SILAS LEE, III
who, after being deposed did state the following:
1.
I am president of Silas Lee and Associates, a public
opinion, research and consulting company in New Orleans,
Louisiana, and Richmond, Virginia. Silas Lee and Associated are
consultants to numerous business, retail and fast food
corporations, government agencies, broadcasting stations,
newspapers, politicians and banks. The company also publishes
numerous studies, polls and commentaries yearly which have
appeared in the Times-Picayune, USA Today, The Louisiana Weekly,
the Nevada Journal, U.S. News and World Report, Ebony Magazine,
CBS Evening News and a host of other publications.
2.
I am also a sociology instructor for the Loyola University
Upward Bound Program-New Orleans, Louisiana, a member of the
National Business League, the National Association of Political
Consultants and a court certified expert on the social and
economic status of blacks in America and public opinion research.
3.
I received my Bachelor of Arts in Political
Science/Sociology from Loyola University in New Orleans, and a
Master of Science in Urban Studies from' the University of New
Orleans. I have published extensive research in Social
Stratification and Public Opinion Polls. One of my several
associates is Dr. Daniel C. Thompson, Professor Emeritus of
Sociology and former Vice-President of Academic Affairs of
Dillard University in New Orleans. Dr. Thompson is the author of
over 200 articles and six books on various subjects in sociology,
economic development and social stratification.
4.
The current at large system of electing Louisiana Supreme
Court judges dilutes and minimizes the opportunities for blacks
to be elected to the Louisiana Supreme Court. The following data
is offered in support of this theory.
VOTER REGISTRATION BREAKDOWN
MARCH 31, 1987
TOTAL WHITE BLACK
Orleans 251,359 118,232 131,726
Jefferson 199,534 174,742 23,825
St. Tammany A , 69,965 63,197 23,825
St. Bernard \ 40,086 38,508 1,577
Plaquemines 15,198 11,376 2,825
SOURCE: LOUISIANA ELECTIONS COMMISSIONER
The above statistics clearly show that as we move outside of
the city of New Orleans, black voter strength is diluted. The
rate of black voter participation decreases from 52% in Orleans
Parish to 12% in Jefferson, 9% in St. Tammany and 4% in St.
Bernard, thus handicapping the possibility for a black candidate
to run successfully in the present district.
Judicial races are expensive traditionally and have low
visibility and low voter interest. Although blacks have run
successfully in judicial elections in New Orleans, they continue
to encounter financial restraints and low voter interest. A
successful judicial campaign in New Orleans may cost more than
$100,000. Since most black candidates for judgeship lack the
financial resources to underwrite their own campaign, fund
raising often becomes an insurmountable obstacle. Also, due to
the fact that judicial races receive low media coverage, black
candidates with low name recognition have to spend more money for
advertising and organization than in other races. Considering
the upcoming Louisiana Supreme Court election as an example, a
potential black candidate will be faced with the racially skewed
voter registration statistics for Metro New Orleans, the need for
a estimated campaign budget in excess of $100,000, and realize
that their chances for winning is nonexistent.
•
For all the reasons set forth above and more, I believe that
the chances for a black to be elected to the Louisiana Supreme
Court under the present district are diluted and minimal at best.
5.
The scheduled election for the State Supreme Court in the
fall of 1988, will not provide a black candidate adequate
opportunities to organize and fund a competitive campaign in this
election, and as a result, a black candidate will be denied an
opportunity to be elected to this judicial opening for at least
ten years.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED
BEFORE ME, THIS v0-07)
DAY OF
1988.
NOTARY PUBLIC
SILAS LEE, III