Kemp v. Rubin Brief for Appellant

Public Court Documents
January 1, 1939

Kemp v. Rubin Brief for Appellant preview

Sarah M. Kemp, John H. Lutz and Irene Lutz on behalf of themselves and all others equally interested acting as respondents. Samuel Richardson acting as appellants.

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Order for Court Appearance, 1970. 90112482-d267-f011-bec2-7c1e52467ee8. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e919f8bc-406a-4e3a-b7d8-2d37af891e2d/order-for-court-appearance. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI 

  

JOAN ANDERSON, et al., ) 

Pl aintit fs 5 ) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION WO. 370041) 

CANTON MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL ) ORDER 
DISTRICT, eb al., ) 

and ) 

) 
MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ) 
et al., 3 

Defendants. = 

The Court having considered the United States 

application for an order to show cause and the grounds 

therefore, it is therefore 

ORDERED 

That the defendant shall appear in the court at 

Jackson, Mississippi at 9:00 a.m. on the day of 

, 1970 to show cause why the student   

desegregation plan implemented by the School District 

failed to achieve the amount of desegregation projected 

by the school board in its subsequent motion to modify 

the desegregation plan prepared by the Office of Education 

of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and 

 



  

further why the School Dis LCL Should NoL be Tequired 

to implement the original desegregation plan prepared 

by HEW for the 1970-71 school year. 

RDERED this _sdoy of July, 1970. 

et ———— 
N VT 
wl! 

Jax ly 

a aaa TE ST ART EAE EN 

UNITED 

  

ATES DISTRICT

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top