Suit Asks Rights Act Compliance by S. Carolina Restaurant Chain

Press Release
December 29, 1964

Cite this item

Suit Asks Rights Act Compliance by S. Carolina Restaurant Chain preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 84cc8d8a-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. Attorneys ask Alabama Supreme Court for stay of Jail Sentences for Negro Leaders in Birmingham, 1963. 63aa673c-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c6ef82f6-5fd9-47de-b00f-03b307bdb49f/attorneys-ask-alabama-supreme-court-for-stay-of-jail-sentences-for-negro-leaders-in-birmingham. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    PRESS RELEASE @ @ 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
1OCOLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEW YORK19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397 
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG 
President CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY 

Director-Counsel Associate Counsel 

os 

ATTORNEYS ASK ALABAMA SUPREME COURT 
FOR STAY OF JAIL SENTENCES FOR 

NEGRO LEADERS IN BIRMINGHAM 
May 15, 1963 

NEW YORK -- NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys Arthur D. Shores and 

Norman Amaker asked the Supreme Court of Alabama today to stay the 

sentences, issued April 26th by a Birmingham Circuit Court, of 

Dr. Martin Luther King and ten of his aides. An appeal was filed 

Monday with the Alabama high court. 

The Southern Christian Leadership Conference officials are 

scheduled to begin serving five day jail terms tomorrow. They were 

also fined $50 each. They were convicted of criminal contempt by 

Judge W, A, Jenkins for violating his injunction against anti-segre- 

gation demonstrations which was issued April 10th. The injunction 

prohibited unlawful picketing, parading and other forms of demonstrat- 

ing. 

SCLC officials who face sentence, in addition to Dr. King, are 

Ralph Abernathy, F. L. Shuttlesworth, Wyatt T. Walker, Andrew Young, 

James Bevel, T. L. Fisher, J. W. Hayes, A. D. King, John T, Porter 

and Nelson H, Smith, Jr. 

The brief filed by Legal Defense Fund attorneys argues, among 

other things, that the “injunction [of April 10th] is void as a denial 

of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitu- 

tion of the United States." 

Fund attorneys are representing all of the more than 2,000 Negro 

citizens who have been convicted in Birmingham for demonstrations dur- 

ing the last month. The attorneys are Arthur D. Shores and Orzell 

Billingsley, Jr. of Birmingham, and Norman C, Amaker, Leroy Clark, 

Jack Greenberg and Mrs. Constance Baker Motley of New York City. 

HHH

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Suit Asks Rights Act Compliance by S. Carolina Restaurant Chain

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in