Hopwood v. Texas Opposing Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees'

Public Court Documents
January 20, 1995

Cite this item

Hopwood v. Texas Opposing Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees' preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Hopwood v. Texas Opposing Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees' Hopwood and Carvell

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- Education
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 1ff59b67-b89a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Jo-Anne Chasnow (Voting and Education Campaign), 1986. 1354c54e-e992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b8dbc396-75b3-412b-8f97-cb960b311a27/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-jo-anne-chasnow-voting-and-education-campaign. Accessed June 02, 2025.

Copied!

    Lesa,EDrenseH.

February 18, 1986

Ms. Jo-Anne Chasnow, Coordinator
New Jersey Campaign
Human Service Employees Registration, Voting

and Education Campaign
522 West l}3th Street
New York, N.Y. 10025

Dear Jo-Anne:
I received your letter of Eebruary 12, 1986.
I am delighted to learn of your referendum
campaign in New Brunswick, although I have
misgivings about replacing the at-Iarge system
with a mixed system rather than a single mem-
ber districting pIan. Please feel free to call
me to discuss these concerns. In any event,
LDF does not endorse campaigns such as yours,
and, l, therefore, regret my inability to help
you at this time.

If, after your campaign, it is necessary to take
the matter to court, please let me hear from you
immediately.

Thank you for keeping me informed of your plans.

SindQety,,/ ,/
--/ -/

1..1L/1/\4-

Lani Guinier

LG/ r

Contributions are deductible fm U.S. incomc tan purpoees

Ihe NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE E EDUCAIIoNAL FUND is not part ol the National Association tor the Advancement o, Colored People although il
was lounded by it and shares its commitment lo equal rights. LDF has had lor over 25 years a separate Board, program, stall, ollice and budget.

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUNO, INC.

99 Hudson Street, New york, N.y. .t0013o(212) 21$.1900

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Hopwood v. Texas Opposing Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees'

Impact area

Topic

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in