Memo from Perkins to Matthews File
Correspondence
March 12, 1991

4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Matthews v. Kizer Hardbacks. Memo from Perkins to Matthews File, 1991. d2906f42-5d40-f011-b4cb-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/bfde2130-2447-4247-93eb-5da016d10a04/memo-from-perkins-to-matthews-file. Accessed July 30, 2025.
Copied!
National Health Law Program, INC. MAIN OFFICE La Cienega Boulevard geles, California 90034 (213) 204-6010 Fax #: (213) 204-0891 Memo BRANCH OFFICE TERT — . Street, N.W. Suite 705 : : wed LEGAL DEFENSE Washington, D.C. 20006 Fax #: (202) 785-6792 From: Jpy¥ Date: March 12, 1991 Re: Production of Documents [set 1] Document #1 (1 page): Letter from Ruth Range, CHDP Regional Operations Section Chief, to Arthur Lisbin, LA Co. Dept. of Health Services (July 26, 1989) states that "current medical guidelines," which require an FEP Test before doing a blood lead level determination, are under revision and that the requirement was dropped from the PM160 form. Dr. Lynn Goldman, Chief of the State Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology Section states that if single test is to be done, it should be blood lead. "Ideally . . . one should obtain concurrent measures of both" because FEP is a better measure of past exposure. DHS has reimbursed blood lead test even though an FEP test was not recorded as being done. Document #2 (1 page): Letter from Arthur Lisbin to Ruth Range (July 11, 1989) Recommends that medical guidelines be revised and the FEP test removed as a test for lead peisoning. Document #3 (1 page): Letter from Gordon Cumming, CHDP Chief, to Barbara Allen, Director Alameda Co. CHDP Prog. (Feb. 15, 1990) States that FEP test "is no longer" required before blood level test will be reimbursed "The program has always promoted lead testing in children whose histories indicated they are at risk for lead poisoning." Reimbursement will be approved only when the blood test is part of a complete CHDP health assessment. l FUNDED BY THE LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Ae [We need to find out what this means. If it means that the provider must be able to render the complete CHDP screen, it is illegal.] Asks county to "inform us of the number of children you plan to test and other specific risk criteria to be used” Document #4 (3 pages): Letter from Barbara Allen to Gordon Cumming {Feb. 5, 1990) Seeks approval to screen high risk Alameda County residents including the City of Berkeley between 9 months to 6 years of age "routinely" using blood lead determinations directly, rather than first screening for FEP. Refers to 1986 Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program (CLPPP) law (H & S Code 3097). Lead poisoning in Oakland children "is a public health crisis." 1.3% of children examined had blood lead levels greater than 25 ug/dl; 19.1% has levels greater than 15 ug/dl. EP sensitivity in detecting blood lead is "extremely poor." If EP test had been used in Oakland, 20% of the children would have been missed. Notes that Kenneth Kizer made Lynn Goldman and Mary Haan, Program Director/Epidemiologist of the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Project, available to Alameda Co. to assist in development of an effective lead screening, diagnosis, treatment, abatement and community education plan. "The screening component provides for blood-lead determination by venipuncture of all at-risk Oakland children, 9 months to 6 years of age." (p. 2) Campaign to begin March or April 1990. Document #5 (3 pages): CHDP Program Informaticn Notice #82-E (To: Community CHDP Directors and Deputy Directors, March 24, 1982) Re: Lead Poisoning in Hispanic Children due to folk remedy azarcon. Document #6 (15 pages): CHDP Fiscal Year 1984-85 Fact Book 283 children received Lead:FEP test, and 2 received Lead: Blood test. 440,084 children received services through Medi-Cal. Minority children constituted 62% of those served. 2,878,765 people (10.9% of population) were eligible for Medi-Cal services. Fact Book also reports on Medi-Cal eligible children by age, ethnicity, gender, county of residence, and on provider type. Document #7 (57 pages) CHDP Regulations (July 1990) excerpted from Title 17 CCR. "Health assessment" includes as a required screening procedure "testing for . . . lead poisoning where appropriate." (sec. 6846). "Screening" not defined (sec. 6818). Cites to H&S Code 208 and 121, 320 et seq. "Periodicity" defined at sec. 6847. Schedule of maximum allowance (sec. 6868) FEP: $7.50, Lead blood: $22.45. Informing duties at sec. 6824; outreach at sec. 6842. Document #8 (39 pages) CDC, Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young Children (1985). Chapter IV discusses screening [and is very good]. Document #9 (53 pages) DHS, CHDP Medical Guidelines (Dec. 31, 1982) Health assessment procedures form lists FEP -- "may be done only if health history warrants;" Blood Lead level -- "may be done only if FEP is above 35 ug/dl." Includes lead paint education as suggested health education topic. States that children with pica behavior are candidates for lead poisoning. "Strongly recommends" venous blood sample if lead poisoning is suspected. "If this is not possible," finger prick for FEP. Defines poisoning at 25 ug /dl. Poisoned children "should be referred to" Public Health Nursing and an "environmental investigation should be initiated." Requires prior approval for "routine testing on all children screened." (page 26) Document #10 (61 pages) PM160 Instructions (May 1990) The form to be used by providers to request payment for health assessment services. The general instructions say that a "complete health assessment must be done" 3 according to the instructions contained in later sections of the PM160 form. The instructions explain in detail how to complete the billing form. The instructions include two separate lead tests as "other tests," as follows: "Code 14 Lead: FEP -- Should be done if health history warrants or prior approval received from State. Code 15 lead: blood lead." Page 50 lists health assessment procedures required for various age groups. FEP and blood lead level tests are listed under laboratory tests, and instructions state: "May be done if health history warrants." Includes schedule of maximum allowances ($7.50 for FEP and $22.45 for venous blood test). According to the instructions, CHDP pays only for screening. If the recipient is covered by Medi-Cal, the Medi-Cal fiscal intermediary must be billed for covered diagnosis and treatment. Document #11 (6 pages): CHDP Billing Forms Copies of the confidential screening/billing report form for CHDP assessments by providers. Lead tests listed under "other test."