Fort Wayne Prison Officials Under Attack by LDF

Press Release
April 2, 1971

Fort Wayne Prison Officials Under Attack by LDF preview

Cite this item

  • Press Releases, Volume 6. Fort Wayne Prison Officials Under Attack by LDF, 1971. e5569470-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c10ec675-cfb8-4ab3-af9e-171c8900fa03/fort-wayne-prison-officials-under-attack-by-ldf. Accessed October 09, 2025.

    Copied!

    egal | efense 

April 2, 1971 
For Immediate Release 

FORT WAYNE PRISON OFFICIALS UNDER ATTACK BY LDF 

In a lawsuit filed yesterday (4/1) in a U.S. District Court in 

Ft, Wayne, Indiana by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, 

Inc. (LDF) and by Legal Aid of Ft. Wayne, Inc., Allen County Jail 

officials were charged with resorting to bribery and intimidation 

ef inmates and lawyers in an attempt to forestall legal action 

against alleged unconstitutional conditions and unfair treatment of 

prisoners at the Ft. Wayne jail. 

According to affidavits filed by local attorneys Hugo Martz 

and Edward Bearse, and by Isaac Parsley, an inmate of the Allen 

County Jail whe :hesimckugetbersummmvicted of any crime, jail 

officials had denied attorneys reasonable access to their clients, 

and had placed prisoners’in isolation cells in order to discourage 

complaints against conditions at the jail. One affidavit also stated 

that Allen County sheriff Robert Bender told attorney Bearse that his 

clients would be released from isolation if the attorney would not 

file the suit on jail conditions and treatment. Bearse's affidavit 

states that he allowed bender to believe the suit would be dropped, 

in order to give his clients some relief from isolation -- where one 

had already attempted suicide. 

Bearse's affidavit further states that he now fears for the 

welfare of the jail's population, and has asked the federal judge to 

issue an order restraining prison officials from bringing reprisals 

against inmates for the legal action they have taken. 

Complaints against conditions at the jail include charges that 

the jail (about Q years old) has grossly inadequate ventilation 

and heating, plumbing, bathing and toilet facilities; that the food 

is ill-prepared and nutritionally insufficient; that the cells are 

grossly overcrowded; that mail, including correspondence to and from 

NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. | 10 Columbus Circle | New York, N.Y. 10019 | (212) 586-8397 

William T. Coleman; Jr. - President Jack Greenberg - Director-Counsel 



FORT WAYNE JAIL Page 2 

attorneys, is arbitrarily censored; that many phone calls, even 

those to and from counsel, are monitored; that telephone, mail and 

visiting privileges are granted or withdrawn arbitrarily and in- 

consistently; that prison officials, who lump together both hardened 

criminals and minor offenders, oftentimes juveniles, only segregate 

prisoners by race; and that the use of isolation cells is arbitrary; 

that inmates are never given hearings to determine the fairness of 

isolation confinement; that prisoners are often unaware of what they 

have done to warrent isolation; and that the duration of a prisoner's 

confinement in isolation is at the complete whim of the jailer. 

Plaintiffs' attorneys have relied, in part, upon grand jury 

reports which were filed yearly since 1962, all of which have 

urged that funds be appropriated for a new jail. For this reason, 

members of the Allen County Council and Allen County Commissioners 

ee named as defendants. The Commissioners hold responsibility 

for issuing orders for repairs recommended by the grand jury, and 

the Council hold the power of fixing tax rates for the county. 

=30= 

For further information contact: Stanley Bass or 
Sandy O'Gorman 
212-586-8397

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.