Order Tentatively Approving Compromise and Settlement and Requiring Notice to the Class

Public Court Documents
February 3, 1983

Order Tentatively Approving Compromise and Settlement and Requiring Notice to the Class preview

3 pages

Date taken from index.

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Order Tentatively Approving Compromise and Settlement and Requiring Notice to the Class, 1983. 84fac8d8-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c24f0d95-463b-4d31-86cd-f43ff3bb6995/order-tentatively-approving-compromise-and-settlement-and-requiring-notice-to-the-class. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

WILEY L. BOLDEN, et al., ) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

and 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) 

VS. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 75-297-P 

CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, ) 
etal. 

Defendants. ) 

ORDER TENTATIVELY APPROVING COMPROMISE AND 
SETTLEMENT AND REQUIRING NOTICE TO THE CLASS 
  

At a conference in chambers on January 31, 1983, counsel 

for all of the parties informed the Court that they had 

resolved upon a final compromise and settlement of this 

action and sought this Court's tentative approval of its 

terms. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the City 

Defendants would agree not to appeal a final judgment against 

the present at-large system of electing Mobile City 

Commissioners, and the Plaintiffs would agree not to appeal 

an order providing that the next elections under a 

 



  

e 

court-ordered plan will not be held until 1985. The United 

States, however, noted its objection to postponement of 

remedial elections to 1985. The proposed compromise 

contemplates that the Alabama Legislature will act 

expeditiously in carrying out its responsibility to enact a 

new state-approved election plan for the City of Mobile that 

complies with the constitution and laws of the United States. 

The court-ordered election plan is established only as a 

temporary measure to govern Mobile city elections unless or 

until a new election plan is provided by the state 

legislature. Under the court-ordered election plan, the 

three City Commissioners would be elected from single-member 

districts, the boundaries of which will be determined at a 

later date -by the Court. City Commissioners elected under 

the court-ordered plan would act as a Board and would not 

designate, formally or informally, individual executive 

responsibilities to themselves. A city admministrator would 

be appointed by the City Commission to supervise and 

coordinate the executive and administrative functions. 

The Court is of the opinion that, pursuant to Rule 

23(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., notice of this proposed compromise 

should be given to the members of the class of black citizens 

of the City of Mobile. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant 

City of Mobile cause the notice attached to this order to be 

 



  

published in the Mobile Register and the Mobile Press 
  

  

times prior to 21983. 
  

It is further ORDERED that copies of the attached notice 

shall be provided by the Defendant City of Mobile to 

representatives of all local radio and television stations 

who have offices in the City of Mobile. Copies shall also be 

supplied by the Defendant City to all of the media 

representatives and black community organizations in Mobile 

who may request a copy thereof. 

Thereafter on , 1983 at 
  

0'Clock, .m., this Court shall conduct a hearing in 

the second floor courtroom in the federal courthouse, St. 

Louis and St. Joseph Street, Mobile, Alabama, to consider 

objections by members of the class to the proposed compromise 

and settlement. 

  

DONE this day of , 1983, 

  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top