Final Order Approving Escambia County Settlement; Final Consent and Decree Between Plaintiffs and Escambia County Defendants
Public Court Documents
May 5, 1986
14 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Final Order Approving Escambia County Settlement; Final Consent and Decree Between Plaintiffs and Escambia County Defendants, 1986. c01ab6be-b8d8-ef11-a730-7c1e5218a39c. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c46801a3-6d55-4191-a747-446fac434f22/final-order-approving-escambia-county-settlement-final-consent-and-decree-between-plaintiffs-and-escambia-county-defendants. Accessed December 01, 2025.
Copied!
®
| »
ay, s71
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MAY 5 1986
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA :
NORTHERN DIVISION THOMAS C. CAVER, CLER
DEPUTY CLERK
JOHN DILLARD,” ET AL...
Plaintiffs,
VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N
CRENSHAW COUNTY, ALABAMA,
£7 AL.
Sg
r?
Se
g?
S
g
?
Ng
?
Cm
gd
Np
ed
Ve
m?
Nm
pd
Sm
gd
C
m
Defendants.
FINAL. ORDER APPROVING ESCAMBIA COUNTY SETTLEMENT
Pursuant to Order of this Court entered on March 17th, 1986, a
hearing was held on April 18th, 1986, to determine the fairness and
adequacy of the proposed settlement submitted by the parties pursuant
to the requirements of Rule 23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At
the hearing attorneys for both plaintiffs and Escambia County
defendants urged the Court to approve the settlement and presented
evidence that the publication and notice requirements of this Court's
Order of March 17th, 1986 had been complied with and presented
supporting demographic data and testimony describing the districting
plan. Defendants further presented testimony and documents proving
submission to the United States Department of Justice under
provisions of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act and filed with the
Court a letter from that department dated April 14th, 1986 interposing
no objections to the proposal.
Further testimony elicited at the hearing supported publication,
notice and a meeting of the County Commissior opemed to the public for
the purpose of explaining the plan. No class members filed any written
objections with the County or with the Clerk of this Court, and none
appeared in ‘person {0 express any objections to the proposed
settlement. Further testimony ' indicated satisfaction with the plan
among those members of the plaintiff class contacted.
This Court finds that the requirements of Rule 23, Fed. R.Civ.P.
concerning notice to the class have been met and that the proposed
seitlement is fair, Just and equitable. LC on 1] t, 559 F.2d
1326 (5th Cir. 1977); Holm Conti a OQ 706. F.2d 1144
(11th Cir," 1883); lLurns _v. Russell Corporation, 604 F.Supp. 1335
(Md. Ala. 1984). This Court further finds preclearance bby the
Department of Justice pursuant $0 the provisions of Section 5 of the
Voting Rights Act of 1865, #2: U.S.C. Section 1873(c).
THEREFORE, the Court hereby enjoins Escambia County, Alabama;
Martha Kirkland, in her official capacity as Probate Judge of Escambia
County; James D. Taylor, in his official capacity as Circuit Clerk of
Escambia County; Timothy A. Hawsey, in his official capacity as
Sheriff of Escambia County; Devon Wiggins, William Cook, James E.
Evans, Sammy McGowin, and Weldon Vickrey, in their official capacities
as members of the Escambia County Commission; their agents, servants,
attorneys and those acting in concert with them from failing or
refusing to conduct primary elections for the Escambia County
Commission in accordance with the plans submitted by the parties to
this Court.
PA
DONE this the day of Lie! 1986.
wet Qle—
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
- p >
.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE | LI
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JOBN DILLARD, ET 4AL.,
Plaintiffs,
Vs,
CRENSHAW COUNTY,
BT 4L.,
ALABAMA,
Defendants.
MAY © 1986
THOMAS C. CAVER, CLERY
BY
LEPUTY CLERK
CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N
|
WO
R
J
CR
G
WH
S
S
I
VE
J
V
W
J
SS
FINAL CONSENT DECREE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS
AND
This lawsuit was brought by plaintiffs,
White, ‘Willie NMcGlasker,
behalf of themselves and
County, Alabama. Plaintiffs
utilized by the Escambis
diluted thelr right to vote
amendments and 42 U.S.C.
The defendants are Escambia County,
Kirkland,
in his official capacity as
his official capacity as
attorneys,
direction.
sections 1973,
in her official capacity as Probate Judge;
employees and those acting in concert with
Ullyses McBride, John T,
William America and Woodrow McCorvey, on
Others similarly situated in Escambia
alleged that the at-large election system
County Commission denied, abridged and
pursuant to the fourteenth and fifteenth
1983 and 1988.
Al abama, gua County; Martha
James D. Taylor,
Circuit Clerk, and Timothy A. Hawsey, in
Sheriff of Escambia County; their agents,
them or at their
The defendants denied the allegations of %Zhe complaint. The
parties engaged in extensive discovery and the case was being
readied for trial. Prior fo trial on the meriis of this case, the
Parties met and discussed settlement, and they entered into a mutually
satisfactory settlement of all <caims and have consented to the
issuance of this decree, order and Judgment. (Hereinafter "this
Decreet), :
The court has fully examined this settlement and finds that it is
fair, reasonable and adequate, that the rights of the Class
represented by the named plaintiffs, and each member thereof, are and
will be ‘fully protected by the settlement, and that it is in
accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Voting
Rights Act of 1965, as amended and follows the applicable rules and
principles of law,
THEREFORE, upon due consideration by the court of the record
herein, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
This court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject of
this action.
IX. Notice.
The court has heretofore approved by order a form and mode of
Notice to. Class concerning the settlement. This order has Deen
complied with and the Court finds that adequate notice has been given
{0 the Class,
1lX. Ihe Election Process
1. There shall be five single-member commission districts
established in Escambia County as drawn on the map on file with this
Court and as advertised and published by the county.
2 Elettions shall be held in districts numbered one, three and
five in 1986 and in districts numbered two and four in 1988. Tne
commissioners so elected shall serve four year terms in accordance
with state law. The incumbent at-large commissioners whose terms do
not expire until January 1989, i.e. those residing in and representing
districts two and four, and the Chairman, shall be allowed to serve
out their current terms. When the commissioners elected in 1986 take
office, the Escambia County Commission shall consist temporarily of
six commissioners. When the single-member district commissioners
elected in 1988 take office, the Escambia County Commission shall
consist of five commissioners elected for four-year staggered terms.
3. When the commissioners from single-member districts take
office in 1989, the county commissioners shall elect one of their
number {0 be president of the commission. The president of the
commission shall preside at meetings of the county commission, shall
set the agenda and perform such other duties required of a chairman by
general law of the State of Alabama, but shall receive no more
compensation than does any other commissioner.
4. The Escambia County Commission shall be empowered to appoint
a full time county administrator.
5. The plaintiffs are prevailing parties for the purpose of the
award of attorneys' fees and expenses. A determination of plaintiffs?
claims for attorneys' fees and expenses is deferred until further
order of the court or aphroprigte motion by any party.
6. This plan shall remain in effect only until the Legislature
of Alabama shall adopt a plan, whether it is the plan approved by this
Court or another plan, which meets the requirements of the laws and
Constitution of the United States.
DONE this the S¥ day of M cin , 1986.
Alm me
~N NS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Agreed to:
EDWARD STILL
REEVES & STILL
714 South 29th Street
Birmingham, Alabama 35233-2810
(20) 322-6631
DEBORAH FINS
JULIUS L. CHAMBERS
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
(212) 219-1900
TERRY G. DAVIS
SEAY & DAVIS
732 Carter Hill Road
P.O. Box 6125
Montgomery, Alabama 36101
REC KIRKLAND, JR.
307 Evergreen Avenue
P.O. Box 646
Brewton, Alabama 36427
(205) 867-5711
Yu BLL
TEMES 'U. BLACKSHER
ARRY T, MENEFEE
BLACKSHER, MENEFEE & STEIN P.A.
405 Van Antwerp Building
P.O. Box 1051
Mobile, Alabama 36633
(205) 433-2000
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
LEE OTIS
OTTS & MOORE
P.O, Box 467
Brewtoy, Alabama 36427
7 AMES W. WESB~
/ WEBB, CRUMPTON & McGREGOR
P.O. Box 238
166 Commerce Street
Montgomery, Alabama 36101
(205) 834-3176
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, ESCAMBIA COUNTY, ET AL.
ED 228
ED 23}
ED 233
ED 234
ED 236
Deviation - +0,51%
White - 61.6%
Black -37.8%
SEAT #1
WHITE
578
1079
1503
104
1299
4753
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
Deviation 1 -0.66%
ees
226
287
229
230R
230B
23%
e37P
237@
c37R
e378
c38
White
Black
TOTAL
172%
1056
132
759
1401
183
144
108
208
ge
10
188g
7627
SERT #2
WHITE
1662
1054
132
S68
1020
1635
144
7
139
22
10
1493
£487
OTHER
R
a
>
n
¥
ED 232
ED 237 less 0-8 & K
ED 239 less I-p
ED 240
ED 241
ED 242
Deviation: +0. 29%
White 1 68.1%
Black 3 26,1%
SERT #3
WHITE
1290
1630
404
707
254
981
S326
BLACK
333
379
30
348
13
3907
2010
SERT #4
WHITE
237K 108
e373 280
2391 124
239J 8
239K 203
239L 73
239M 314
239N 58
2390 263
2339p 138
246 798
247 1446
248 780
249 1213
250 less J-P & PL 149%
~J
n
N
O
P
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
:
no
a
O
Deviation: +1.,29%
White 1 S93. 4%
Black 1 2. T%
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
ED
243
244
2435
250J
230K
250L
250M
250N
e500
250P
250PL
251
Deviation:
White
Black :
-1. 50%
28. 8%
68. 0%
BERT #5
WHITE
2177
SUMMARY
TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER
SERT #1 7717 4753 e915 49
SEAT #2 7627 6487 1098 42
SERT #3 7708 2326 2010 372
EBERT #4 : 7777 7265 elo 302
SEAT #5 1363 2177 »143 _R43
38392 26008 11376 1008
%DEV, AWHITE XBLACK
SERT #1 +0, 51 61.6 37.8
SERT #2 -0. 66 835. 1 14. 4
SERT #3 +0. 39 £9. 1 ce. 1
SERT #4 +1.29 S3. 4 2.7
SERT #5 wieN 28. 8 68.0
Ideal Commission Seat: 7678
Total Deviation for this plant 2.79%