Final Order Approving Escambia County Settlement; Final Consent and Decree Between Plaintiffs and Escambia County Defendants
Public Court Documents
May 5, 1986

14 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Final Order Approving Escambia County Settlement; Final Consent and Decree Between Plaintiffs and Escambia County Defendants, 1986. c01ab6be-b8d8-ef11-a730-7c1e5218a39c. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c46801a3-6d55-4191-a747-446fac434f22/final-order-approving-escambia-county-settlement-final-consent-and-decree-between-plaintiffs-and-escambia-county-defendants. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
® | » ay, s71 FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MAY 5 1986 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA : NORTHERN DIVISION THOMAS C. CAVER, CLER DEPUTY CLERK JOHN DILLARD,” ET AL... Plaintiffs, VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N CRENSHAW COUNTY, ALABAMA, £7 AL. Sg r? Se g? S g ? Ng ? Cm gd Np ed Ve m? Nm pd Sm gd C m Defendants. FINAL. ORDER APPROVING ESCAMBIA COUNTY SETTLEMENT Pursuant to Order of this Court entered on March 17th, 1986, a hearing was held on April 18th, 1986, to determine the fairness and adequacy of the proposed settlement submitted by the parties pursuant to the requirements of Rule 23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At the hearing attorneys for both plaintiffs and Escambia County defendants urged the Court to approve the settlement and presented evidence that the publication and notice requirements of this Court's Order of March 17th, 1986 had been complied with and presented supporting demographic data and testimony describing the districting plan. Defendants further presented testimony and documents proving submission to the United States Department of Justice under provisions of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act and filed with the Court a letter from that department dated April 14th, 1986 interposing no objections to the proposal. Further testimony elicited at the hearing supported publication, notice and a meeting of the County Commissior opemed to the public for the purpose of explaining the plan. No class members filed any written objections with the County or with the Clerk of this Court, and none appeared in ‘person {0 express any objections to the proposed settlement. Further testimony ' indicated satisfaction with the plan among those members of the plaintiff class contacted. This Court finds that the requirements of Rule 23, Fed. R.Civ.P. concerning notice to the class have been met and that the proposed seitlement is fair, Just and equitable. LC on 1] t, 559 F.2d 1326 (5th Cir. 1977); Holm Conti a OQ 706. F.2d 1144 (11th Cir," 1883); lLurns _v. Russell Corporation, 604 F.Supp. 1335 (Md. Ala. 1984). This Court further finds preclearance bby the Department of Justice pursuant $0 the provisions of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1865, #2: U.S.C. Section 1873(c). THEREFORE, the Court hereby enjoins Escambia County, Alabama; Martha Kirkland, in her official capacity as Probate Judge of Escambia County; James D. Taylor, in his official capacity as Circuit Clerk of Escambia County; Timothy A. Hawsey, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Escambia County; Devon Wiggins, William Cook, James E. Evans, Sammy McGowin, and Weldon Vickrey, in their official capacities as members of the Escambia County Commission; their agents, servants, attorneys and those acting in concert with them from failing or refusing to conduct primary elections for the Escambia County Commission in accordance with the plans submitted by the parties to this Court. PA DONE this the day of Lie! 1986. wet Qle— UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE - p > . IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE | LI MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JOBN DILLARD, ET 4AL., Plaintiffs, Vs, CRENSHAW COUNTY, BT 4L., ALABAMA, Defendants. MAY © 1986 THOMAS C. CAVER, CLERY BY LEPUTY CLERK CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N | WO R J CR G WH S S I VE J V W J SS FINAL CONSENT DECREE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND This lawsuit was brought by plaintiffs, White, ‘Willie NMcGlasker, behalf of themselves and County, Alabama. Plaintiffs utilized by the Escambis diluted thelr right to vote amendments and 42 U.S.C. The defendants are Escambia County, Kirkland, in his official capacity as his official capacity as attorneys, direction. sections 1973, in her official capacity as Probate Judge; employees and those acting in concert with Ullyses McBride, John T, William America and Woodrow McCorvey, on Others similarly situated in Escambia alleged that the at-large election system County Commission denied, abridged and pursuant to the fourteenth and fifteenth 1983 and 1988. Al abama, gua County; Martha James D. Taylor, Circuit Clerk, and Timothy A. Hawsey, in Sheriff of Escambia County; their agents, them or at their The defendants denied the allegations of %Zhe complaint. The parties engaged in extensive discovery and the case was being readied for trial. Prior fo trial on the meriis of this case, the Parties met and discussed settlement, and they entered into a mutually satisfactory settlement of all <caims and have consented to the issuance of this decree, order and Judgment. (Hereinafter "this Decreet), : The court has fully examined this settlement and finds that it is fair, reasonable and adequate, that the rights of the Class represented by the named plaintiffs, and each member thereof, are and will be ‘fully protected by the settlement, and that it is in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended and follows the applicable rules and principles of law, THEREFORE, upon due consideration by the court of the record herein, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: This court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject of this action. IX. Notice. The court has heretofore approved by order a form and mode of Notice to. Class concerning the settlement. This order has Deen complied with and the Court finds that adequate notice has been given {0 the Class, 1lX. Ihe Election Process 1. There shall be five single-member commission districts established in Escambia County as drawn on the map on file with this Court and as advertised and published by the county. 2 Elettions shall be held in districts numbered one, three and five in 1986 and in districts numbered two and four in 1988. Tne commissioners so elected shall serve four year terms in accordance with state law. The incumbent at-large commissioners whose terms do not expire until January 1989, i.e. those residing in and representing districts two and four, and the Chairman, shall be allowed to serve out their current terms. When the commissioners elected in 1986 take office, the Escambia County Commission shall consist temporarily of six commissioners. When the single-member district commissioners elected in 1988 take office, the Escambia County Commission shall consist of five commissioners elected for four-year staggered terms. 3. When the commissioners from single-member districts take office in 1989, the county commissioners shall elect one of their number {0 be president of the commission. The president of the commission shall preside at meetings of the county commission, shall set the agenda and perform such other duties required of a chairman by general law of the State of Alabama, but shall receive no more compensation than does any other commissioner. 4. The Escambia County Commission shall be empowered to appoint a full time county administrator. 5. The plaintiffs are prevailing parties for the purpose of the award of attorneys' fees and expenses. A determination of plaintiffs? claims for attorneys' fees and expenses is deferred until further order of the court or aphroprigte motion by any party. 6. This plan shall remain in effect only until the Legislature of Alabama shall adopt a plan, whether it is the plan approved by this Court or another plan, which meets the requirements of the laws and Constitution of the United States. DONE this the S¥ day of M cin , 1986. Alm me ~N NS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Agreed to: EDWARD STILL REEVES & STILL 714 South 29th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35233-2810 (20) 322-6631 DEBORAH FINS JULIUS L. CHAMBERS NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor New York, New York 10013 (212) 219-1900 TERRY G. DAVIS SEAY & DAVIS 732 Carter Hill Road P.O. Box 6125 Montgomery, Alabama 36101 REC KIRKLAND, JR. 307 Evergreen Avenue P.O. Box 646 Brewton, Alabama 36427 (205) 867-5711 Yu BLL TEMES 'U. BLACKSHER ARRY T, MENEFEE BLACKSHER, MENEFEE & STEIN P.A. 405 Van Antwerp Building P.O. Box 1051 Mobile, Alabama 36633 (205) 433-2000 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS LEE OTIS OTTS & MOORE P.O, Box 467 Brewtoy, Alabama 36427 7 AMES W. WESB~ / WEBB, CRUMPTON & McGREGOR P.O. Box 238 166 Commerce Street Montgomery, Alabama 36101 (205) 834-3176 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, ESCAMBIA COUNTY, ET AL. ED 228 ED 23} ED 233 ED 234 ED 236 Deviation - +0,51% White - 61.6% Black -37.8% SEAT #1 WHITE 578 1079 1503 104 1299 4753 ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED Deviation 1 -0.66% ees 226 287 229 230R 230B 23% e37P 237@ c37R e378 c38 White Black TOTAL 172% 1056 132 759 1401 183 144 108 208 ge 10 188g 7627 SERT #2 WHITE 1662 1054 132 S68 1020 1635 144 7 139 22 10 1493 £487 OTHER R a > n ¥ ED 232 ED 237 less 0-8 & K ED 239 less I-p ED 240 ED 241 ED 242 Deviation: +0. 29% White 1 68.1% Black 3 26,1% SERT #3 WHITE 1290 1630 404 707 254 981 S326 BLACK 333 379 30 348 13 3907 2010 SERT #4 WHITE 237K 108 e373 280 2391 124 239J 8 239K 203 239L 73 239M 314 239N 58 2390 263 2339p 138 246 798 247 1446 248 780 249 1213 250 less J-P & PL 149% ~J n N O P W O O O O O O O O O O : no a O Deviation: +1.,29% White 1 S93. 4% Black 1 2. T% ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED ED 243 244 2435 250J 230K 250L 250M 250N e500 250P 250PL 251 Deviation: White Black : -1. 50% 28. 8% 68. 0% BERT #5 WHITE 2177 SUMMARY TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER SERT #1 7717 4753 e915 49 SEAT #2 7627 6487 1098 42 SERT #3 7708 2326 2010 372 EBERT #4 : 7777 7265 elo 302 SEAT #5 1363 2177 »143 _R43 38392 26008 11376 1008 %DEV, AWHITE XBLACK SERT #1 +0, 51 61.6 37.8 SERT #2 -0. 66 835. 1 14. 4 SERT #3 +0. 39 £9. 1 ce. 1 SERT #4 +1.29 S3. 4 2.7 SERT #5 wieN 28. 8 68.0 Ideal Commission Seat: 7678 Total Deviation for this plant 2.79%