Correspondence from Amsterdam to Guinier
Working File
March 31, 1983

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bozeman & Wilder Working Files. Correspondence from Amsterdam to Guinier, 1983. 3a1ff573-f092-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c66459dc-48b2-48c8-b673-4943649ae676/correspondence-from-amsterdam-to-guinier. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
@l New York University A privale univenity in the public service School of Law Faculty of Law 4O Washington Square South, Room 327 New York, N.Y. 10012 Telephone: (212) 598-2638, 2639 Professor Anthony G. Amsterdam i . (1,l1QA r, ) t ,t ' 't l.-t March 31, 1983 Lani Guinier, Ese. N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense Fund 10 Columbus Circle, Suite 2030 New York, New York 10019 re: Maggie S. Bozeman Dear Lani: Please forgive both my delay in getting back to you about the Bozeman habeas petition, and the form of this response. I was cornpletely jammed up between a wall-to-waII teaching schedule and several deadlines in death cases during the week prior to March 26, when I had to go out of town. I took the Bozeman peti- tion with me to read on the plane. As I read through it, I began making marginal notes to my- self in red, indicating points I should mention when we dj-scussed the petition. The notes multiplied, and aL some p-oiut I decidecl to start addressing the notes to you, as a more efficient way of communicating my paragraph-by-paragraph reactions, at least in the first instance. But the earlier notes remain more cryptic than they would have been if I had written them to be read by someone other than myself, and all of the notes are execrably scrawled the result of air turbulence and crowded seating aboard plane. Despite these failings, it seems to me efficient to send you the marked-up draft before we talk, leaving it to you to de- cide what we can most usefully talk about in the liqht of my written comments. But the legibility of the comments is poor, and I'm sorry. Let me identify here the three major suggestions that run through much of the detailed commentary, in the hope of orienting you to the forest before I bury you in a maze of red foliage: (I) The present form of the petition commingles (a) factual a habeas pet..-tionallegations which are appropri-ately pleaded in Lani Guinier, Ese. March 31, 1983 Page Two itself, with (b) argumentative matter which should be removed from the petition and put into a supporting brief or memorandum of law. Obviously, the job of turninq one document into two is more complicated than simply pulling some sentences or paragraphs out of the present draft and putting them into a separate memo. Both the material that remains in the petition and the material which is transferred into the memorandum will have to be amended to maj-ntain the internal continuity of each document; and some matter which is left j-n the petition (usuaIIy in abridged and more lj-near form -- i.e., simple declarative sentences apt for strictly factual allegations) will have to be repeated in the memo (in the form of factual argument interwoven with legal argu- ment). But I have tried to note in a general way from paragraph to paragraph what should stay in the petJ-tJ-on and what should be moved into a memo/brief. (21 I suggest cutting two of the three contentions made in Part B, as too weak to fly. These are the contentions identi- fied in the second paraqraph numbered 31 on page 12 as items (f) and (ii1. The reasons why I think they are weak are set out on pages 15 and L7 respectively. I would suggest integrating the third strand of present Parb B -- that is, item (iii)jnthe second para- graph numbered 3I into Part C as an alternative formulation of one of the two separate aspects of Part C (see page 19). For the suggestion that Part C be more subdivided into two related claims, see page 22. (3) I suggest other structural reorganizations. You will find that some proposals for moving pieces around are first made in "maybe" form (e.g., pages 22,23) and later hardened up into "probably" form (page 281 i others emerge only by collating my notes at several locations. Since none of this presents a co- herent map of the kind of overall organization that I have in mind, I enclose a three-page block-printed outline which might do the job. This, dt leastr wds the product of an airport layover and is more legible than my scribbling on the draft. Whether it makes any more sense substantively, I don't know. 1'1I be happy to talk wj-th you about Bozeman if you think, after looking over tfrese notes, thal that woulcl be useful. Just give me a buzz, okay? Keep well. Best, AGA:Ira (Dictated by Mr. and signed in his Enclosure Amsterdam absence) Anthony G. Amsterdam Possr toEcRt\tz ftrroAl oF Bo}fat4*rl PEAfarl tfftt tr AurrrSsrort 6F TtE SorurtrurcLt + eor.t,nts oc/TuoF-coetf siutrtrraas uor/\65 S?- Ll A. ?le hx Auett. bpfrbafiq7a1 &)trxe_; b I B. Doc. PC.ccsS x [r ,5 T]rtL olJterrcl ruts A//Flt'r1ilrs cj.*at1 Gts B&rc /-ht"*-,}^ FtYf,PLY*tr , ,l'l{ot, r.'.r'/J 'i t'*d ''''r'r/! i 4ft,, o/n'1r ''r ;, t. ?t€ f,uoq lpsrnlcrzoos PtIr,rrTIED ?Enrzoall,'s tclttxcru^r Ir,l urooD6.., oF Doe PCoeCSS B€(lArSe +?--+7 [. nEtl FtDr rTTrD o,turc,;luol of., crt4a6B ^,c? {,tDc lo n|G wDltct,(I,,tr, tl*,ts DCPLturu & EnDcJrr oF FAF lta?rdr, tr t2,4<- seotruf,, Hunatpru :t E +r*rr *nscul , 77la lttltttltSlr 4r{s 3t (iii):35 6'r?Arr); - 36(rr psr); {t (fr,rrD). cocs?_?ay.Ttoet*ar1 ilJ$c,#t&{r ?D Grug 4 z )49 F/n}- ttondz oF f,E cra,lErss scr<tfrED b,fr,,*,ufe,steoana^rs 3 i ,t*l 4q- 57 B, 1tte3 6fpa*ueU TE St+n T6 so kto QDrfte *6* bsr FA?16 Lillt t-tTc7 x EIF llo Tcrh- oBf8clz.A ttrh r{ht, Tttr ca/I^A G,o€S BACS TD Faofalrt poSr.tzo^l .] I S. Tiltat. tuks dousraryr o,.tt,l ll/sstrtr€^.T lb-3o 6urutrlC€ tD da.rU(Lt UpLe,ts. (/rlcSOrJ u. ! tlg,utA 1,",i"-f^1:5]:"*,;l;,,.:,.1-,,,,cn,,d,,,n,n,'q"6 @ fr S . Tl{e Sflrura rS v+6oe lrrl ouTl BGr/tD ort ll3 Flcz /t*D k tppueo 1a Ps"rrroie!'s dortOocr u,i+t4 u*r PPoeftO 87 ?tfE FIFS? rt*o ?r?txtuttl &lAr0yyeltB /ilo ffk usot6 U6rG l*f s{- sb 4. P0rtTttttg2 urE, 4ll,orcFlD od oE EUs op 6rrlerce Sltlg|*ttO flo uoDu, "llrr{ Pto- lEctD darrurr ; ?il.^s Tle- S?rfPlt t tB lrl6lStl"rTtil.'t , tA rl3 l{NlqAet, 6z- 6b B. lltG Uft6rr2 ,hD cMll,BrcAD tr4s oF Trtt 3i;6tTr, rF P€ElmD ltl AotrOptze rths Ltslrt;r Ape Wb^tsvlvlte{Ac FtsFrtrrrrAq lP ueexTl+e SrUdf SilrtDLDs ae s?>fnrayt s)€qFrer?? AethD o7 /{ss 174tff Po- I"mAtrc, ontlDr/#t *e>*<yt Peorr&o ,{,c;fr rf r ftf SZ.S3 C. Arl{ SoucrlL ltml*I.eN |Irtaspo ort rr{e &AD ttrrs ar tE s?+rlrtE W Tt hh#/,/.A so}o,ata boa's Dtdlsrcers Causrra.l,^)G rT rrrs}€ DrsDearhENc\ B, TilE Sup.r larSttoclto A tN pann fieLL Crl6e- 6 q+rsrrvDd Jt "/rnaTtT ,soprn :l+19t{ "ftcaef ?U Ao trrzul6lo tyl ' hryeitynlvnl4 (c2 i.C - L9 sso"qld -a$q qlty FaL?jrL{l ar{r@)g Jo omlvrorn n I t },yelYrrlrl(7?slq Q; h L- L? J3fJ tu ''{],a la[.ta3soud t.?lre4Ed, (q) \vwWW ", n4lwe1a1 Jr)?vnr?viltry ?o hEBS slllofvl (oa&vgono Ztnl4u,l, ?lll eo ilrotrrg"aeo etL(? e@2 lrl ':.IlrgQ qilDaLqld de aJt??",,g it)l lJrtdrr{ et o}rrtrsEq frr}ztasqC aott?lna, de n{irrt ryL r{m tednLuiSd 9