Burns Statement on School Lunch Program; Greenberg Statement on LDF to Challenge Racial Designations in Southern Newspaper Advertisements
Press Release
April 16, 1968 - April 30, 1968
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 5. Burns Statement on School Lunch Program; Greenberg Statement on LDF to Challenge Racial Designations in Southern Newspaper Advertisements, 1968. 59721b9c-b892-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c699d3e1-4ab1-4ba8-8d30-63b7969e2d2d/burns-statement-on-school-lunch-program-greenberg-statement-on-ldf-to-challenge-racial-designations-in-southern-newspaper-advertisements. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
low
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel
egal efense lund Jack Greenberg
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Dic ectety FADES Rela ane
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 Jesse DeVere, Jr: NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487
Statement by Haywood Burns, Assistant Counsel,
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
at the Hotel Willard, Washington, D. C.
April 16, 1968 -- 12:00 noon
We today announce a legal program in conjunction with the
release of the findings of the Committee on School Lunch Participa-
tion. This program has been Gesigned and will be implemented by
attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF),
which seeks to translate these significant findings into day-to-day
meaning in the lives of the nation's children.
This program will follow a three-part approach--federal, state,
and local.
LDF attorneys will consider a suit against Secretary Orville L.
Freeman of the Department of Agriculture seeking to establish defini-
tions and guidelines for implementation of the National School Lunch
Act.
This unprecedented suit will seek:
1) a review of the Secretary's determination to continue chan-
neling funds when and where local authorities violate the statute;
2) to have the Secretary develop specific regulations and
standards for determining eligibility for free and reduced-price
lunches; and
3) to require every school servicing poor people to institute
a free lunch program.
This will attempt to establish uniformity of standards with a
view toward eradicating arbitrary determinations on the local level
and securing for every hungry poor child his rights under the statute.
We will also be concerned with operations of the program on the
state and local level.
One of the recuirements under the Act is that a participating
school must agree to supply lunches to poor children at free or
reduced prices. (See Report, p. 8.)
Yet, as the report demonstrates, there are millions of children
in schools with school lunch programs who go hungry every day simply
because they are too poor to buy lunch at the price the school
authorities have set.
A large part of this program rests with local school officials
who have been delegated the power to determine which individual chil-
dren are unable to pay and, therefore, theoretically entitled to free
or reduced-price lunches.
These officials often make no determination as to eligibility of
individual children, or they make decisions in an arbitrary or capri-
cious fashion since there are ‘no guidélines.
We are filing strategic suits to correct this abuse.
In addition, in schools where there are large numbers of chil-
dren who go without lunch regularly, LDF attorneys will bring a
series of class actions under the equal protection clause of the
Federal Constitution to force state and local officials:
1) to determine who is unable to pay;
5
Statement by Haywood Burns, Asst. Counsel,
NAACP Légal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. -2-
2) for a declaration that they are unable to pay; and
3) for an order that they be provided lunches free or at a
price the children could afford.
The state does not have to participate in the School Lunch
Program. However, once it does, it cannot withhold the benefits of
the program from students of some schools while providing them for
students of cther schools.
In many states throughout the nation, some schools are not
getting the School Lunch Program because the state and/or local
authorities have determined that the children in these schools are
too poor to support the program or that the local school is too poor
to provide the facilities to carry out the program.
It is this disparity in the dispensation of benefits under the
program that will be the focus of the legal attack by the LDF.
=30=
a 10%
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEASE Director Counsel egal fefense und Jack Greenberg
FOR RELEASE Director, te NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. muBSpAY c eaee DEW Esce
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 April 30, 1968 nigHt NuMBER 212-749-8487
Statement by Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel,
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.,
10 Columbus Circle, New York City, Apr.29, 11 a.m.
LDF TO CHALLENGE RACIAL DESIGNATIONS
IN SOUTHERN NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS
NEW YORK---The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF)
announces today that it has sent telegrams to 14 publishers of southern
newspapers calling attention to the fact that they continue to run
racial designations in their housing advertisements and that this is in
violation of the 1968 Civil Rights Act, which subjects these publishers
to suit for such advertising.
Fifteen attorneys from key northern and southern states are con-
ferring in this office today on this housing issue and other housing
discrimination which the LDF attorneys will move to combat under the
fFecently passed Fair Housing Act of 1968.
This is the first such campaign under the new Act.
LDF attorneys are proceeding under §804 of the new Act. In our
wire to the southern publishers, we said:
“The Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibits publication
of advertisements indicating racial discrimination and
preferences in the sales and rentals of houses. This
provision became effective April 11, 1968. We note that
your newspaper continues to publish housing advertisements
containing racial preferences. We call upon you to obey
the new federal law and to announce your intention to
comply forthwith. Such violations of the Act may be
enforced by suits for damages or injunctions in state
or federal courts by private parties or by the Attorney
General of the United States. We would appreciate a
response indicating your plans."
The LDF pledges that, through its New York staff, assisted by 250
cooperating attorneys, it will sue for any violations of the Civil
Rights Act of 1968 brought to its attorneys.
The new Housing Act says that it is unlawful:
(a) To refuse to sell or rent after the making of a bona
fide offer or to refuse to negotiate for the sale or
rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a
dwelling to any person because of race, color, re-
ligion, or national origin.
(b) To discriminate against any person in the terms,
conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a
dwelling, or in the provision of services or
facilities in connection therewith, because of
race, color, religion, or national origin.
(c) To make, print, or publish, or cause to be made,
printed, or published any notice, statement, or
advertisement, with respect to the sale or rental
of a dwelling that indicates any preference, limi-
tation, or discrimination based on race, color,
religion, or national origin, or an intention to
make any such preference, limitation, or discrimi-
nation.
(more)
E25
LDF TO CHALLENGE RACIAL DESIGNATIONS =-2- April 30,
IN SOUTHERN NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS
(a) To represent to any person because of race, color,
religion, or national origin that any dwelling is
not available for inspection, sale or rental when
such dwelling is in fact so available.
The LDF wire was sent to the following publications:
Among the LDF
NOTE: The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is a
separate and distinct organization from the NAACP.
designation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., which
MOBILE, ALA. REGISTER
MONTGOMERY, ALA. ADVERTISER
AUGUSTA, GA. CHRONICLE
ALBANY, GA. HERALD
SAVANNAH NEWS
STATE-TIMES (Baton Rouge)
TIMES-PICAYUNE (New Orieans)
STATES-ITEM (New Orleans)
CLARION LEDGER (Jackson)
CHARLOTTE OBSERVER
WINSTON-SALEM JOURNAL
GREENVILLE NEWS (S.C.)
BEAUMONT ENTERPRISE
RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH.
attorneys in New York City today are:
Gilbert A. Cornfield, Chicago
Howard Moore, Jr., Atlanta
Norman Johnson, New York
Ernest N. Morial, New Orleans
Henry L. Marsh III, Richmond
Julius L. Chambers, Charlotte
James H. Harvey, Philadelphia
Avon N. Williams, Jr., Nashville
Richard L. Banks, Boston
Russell B. Sugamon, Jr., Memphis
Fred B. Gray, Montgomery.
-30-
is shortened to LDF.
1968
Its correct