Brown v. Board of Trustees of the Lagrange Independent School District Transcript of Record
Public Court Documents
August 31, 1950

Cite this item
-
Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Brown v. Board of Trustees of the Lagrange Independent School District Transcript of Record, 1950. 9e746cc9-b69a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c6cea087-9b8d-4d74-afee-d63750c3c26b/brown-v-board-of-trustees-of-the-lagrange-independent-school-district-transcript-of-record. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
TRANSCRIPT OF RECORD. U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T OF A P P E A L S FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 13,317 JULIUS BROWN, Appellant, versus BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LAGRANGE INDE PENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. (ORIGINAL RECORD RECEIVED JULY 8/50.) ' 0 0 - 8 T C Tl. L'E INDEX PAGE Appellant’s Designation of Contents of Record on A ppeal................ 1 Caption ........................................................................ • 3 Plaintiff’s First Amended Original Complaint ....... 3 Defendants’ First Amended Original Answer to First Amended Original Complaint ................................. 12 TRANSCRIPT OF EVIDENCE ................................... 18 Colloquy between Court and Counsel................... 21 Evidence for Plaintiff: Testimony of Julius Edward Brown ........... 26 Motion of Defendants for Dismissal ........... 37 Testimony of George Scott .......................... 38 R. C. Hickman ...................... 69 James C. Jackson ................. 105 R. C. Hickman (Resumed) . . 142 C. A. Lemmons ..................... 154 Evidence for Defendants: Testimony of George Matthews Page ........ 188 Evidence for Plaintiff: Testimony of C. A. Lemmons (Recalled) . . 222 C. A. Lemmons (Resumed) .. 238 Evidence for Defendants: Testimony of Hugh E. Gregg ...................... 291 Evidence for Plaintiff: Testimony of C. A. Lemmons (Resumed) . . 312 Julius Brown (Recalled) . . 414 William N. Farris................... 416 William N. Farris (Resumed) 421 INDEX—Continued PAGE Transcript of Evidence— (Continued): Evidence for Defendants: Testimony of Alvin Baumbach ................... 428 C. A. Lemmons .......... 435 Colloquy between Court and Counsel . . . . . . . . 436 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ............... 441 Final Judgment, entered 3/7/50 ................................ 447 Notice of Appeal .......................................................... 449 Appeal B on d ................................................................... 450 Order dated 7/7/50 Transmitting Original Exhibits to Court of Appeals ........................................... 456 Clerk’s Certificate ................................. 461 II APPELLAN TS DESIGNATION OF RECORD. (Filed May 11, 1950.) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION. JULIUS BROWN, Plaintiff, versus Civil Action No. 4223. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LAGRANGE IN DEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, LAGRANGE, TEXAS, AND THE LAGRANGE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, A BODY CORPORATE, L. D. BOELSCHE, PRESIDENT OF SAID BOARD AND C. A. LEMMONS, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE PUBLIC LAGRANGE, TEXAS, AND OF THE SAID LAGRANGE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Defendants. Now Comes Julius Brown, plaintiff and appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, by and through his attorneys of record, and designates the following portions of the record, proceedings, and evi dence in the said cause to be placed in the record on appeal: 1. Plaintiff’s first amended original complaint. 2. Defendants’ first amended original answer. 2 3. All the evidence adduced upon the trial of the said cause. 4. Judgment of the Court. 5. Notice of appeal. 6. Findings of fact made by the Court and con clusions of law. 7. Appeal bond. Respectfully Submitted: U. SIMPSON TATE, (U. Simpson Tate.) W. J. DURHAM, (W. J. Durham.) BEN N. RAMEY, (Ben N. Ram ey.) Attorneys for Appellant. I Certify that a copy of the above and foregoing des ignation of the record on appeal in the said cause has been served upon attorneys for Appellees by placing one copy in an envelope, bearing the proper amount of postage, and addressed to Mr. Miles Moff, Attorney at Law, LaGrange, Texas, and placing the same in the United States mail, and placing another copy in an envelope, bearing the proper amount of postage, ad- dresed to Mr. Douglass McGregor, attorney at law, Second National Bank Building, Houston, Texas. BEN N. RAMEY, (Ben N. Ramey.) 3 CAPTION, In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Holding Sessions at Houston. Julius Brown, vs. No. GA 4223 Board of Trustees of the LeGrange Independent School District, et al. Be It Remembered: That in the Above Entitled and Numbered Cause, Lately Pending in Said Court, in which Final Judgment was Renedered at the Regular February 1950 Term of Said Court, To- Wit: On the 7th Day of March A. D. 1950, the Hon orable T. M. Kennerly, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Presiding, the Following Proceedings were had, To-wit: * * * * * * * * PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL COM PLAINT. (Filed Nov. 22, 1949.) (Title Omitted.) To The Honorable Judge Of Said Court: Comes now the plaintiff, Julius Brown, . and with leave of the Court first had and obtained, files this 4 plaintiff’s first amended original complaint, and for such amended original complaint, plaintiff alleges: 1. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under judicial Code, Section 24 (1) (28 U. S, C,, Section 41 (1), this being a suit in equity which arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States, viz., the Fourteenth Amendment of said Constitution and sections 41 and 43 of Title 8 of the United Code, wherein the matter in controversy exceeds, exclusive of inter est and costs, the sum of Three Thousand ($3,000.00) Dollars. The jurisdiction of this Court is also invoked under Judicial Code, Section 24 (14) (28 U. S. C., Section 41 (14) this being a suit in equity authorized by law to be brought to redress the deprecation under color of law, statute, regulation, custom and usage of a State, rights, privileges and immunities secured by the Con stitution of the United States, viz., the Fourteenth Amendment to said Constitution, and of rights of citi zens of the United States, viz., Sections 41 and 43 of Title 8 of the United States Code. 2. Plaintiff shows further that this is a proceeding for a declaratory judgment and an injunction under Section 2740 of the Judicial Code for the purpose of de termining a question in actual controversy between the parties, to-wit: The question of whether the practice of the defendants in adopting; enforcing and maintaining the policy, custom and usage of the defendants, and each of them, in maintaining inadequate, unsanitary and inferior schools and school facilities for Negro children in the City of LaGrange and in the LaGrange Independent School District between the ages of six 5 (6) and Twenty-one (21), while maintaining modern, sanitary and superior schools and school facilities for white children in said City of LaGrange, Texas, and in the LaGrange Independent School District, consti tutes a denial of the right to the plaintiff and his child to the equal protection under the laws of the Four teenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 3. All parties to this action, both plaintiff and de fendants, are citizens of the United States and of the State of Texas, and are resident and domiciled in said State; that the defendant, the LaGrange Independent School District at all times mentioned herein was and is by law declared a body corporate, and that said defendant has a Board of Trustees, and that the de fendant L. D. Boelsche is Chairman of said Board of Trustees, and that C. A. Lemmons is an agent, servant and employee of said defendant, and are the principal agents of the defendants, upon whom service may be had for all purposes of this lawsuit. 4. That this plaintiff resides in the LaGrange In dependent School District and is a tax payer and prop erty owner, and that he has one (1) child, to-wit: Vivian Alpha Brown, who resides in the said La Grange Independent School District; and is between the ages of six (6) and twenty-one (21) years, to-wit: Six teen (16) years of age, and she has completed the tenth grade provided under the curriculum of the school in said District; and under the rules and regu lations promulgated by the defendant, LaGrange In dependent School District, has been promoted to the eleventh grade and is eligible to attend the high school provided for and maintained by the State of Texas in the LaGrange Independent School District; and that 6 this law suit is brought for the benefit of this plaintiff and his child, as well as all other persons similarly situated in the said LaGrange Independent School Dis trict. That the plaintiff and those whom he represents are persons of African descent and Negro blood; that the defendant, L. D. Boelsche, is president of the Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School Dis trict, and that the defendant, C. A. Lemmons is Sup erintendent of the LaGrange City School maintained and operated by the State of Texas through the La Grange Independent School District; that the defend ants L. D. Boelsche and C. A. Lemmons are sued in their official capacities herein alleged; that the defend ant, LaGrange Independent School District is a body corporate by virtue of and under the general laws of the State of Texas, and said defendant is sued in its official capacity. 5. That the State of Texas has provided by consti tution and statutes for an efficient system of public free schools, Article 7, Section 1 of the Constitution of the State of Texas. 6. That the State of Texas, under its general laws, has declared and provided for a free public school system for the education of all children between the ages of six and twenty-one. 7. That the State of Texas, under its general laws, has provided for free text books for all children be tween the ages of six and twenty-one, Articles 2839 to 2876J, Revised Civil Statutes of the State of Texas. 8. That under the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas, the defendants and each of them, are charged 7 with the duty of maintaining a general and uniform sys tem of public .schools where tuition shall be free of charge to the children between the ages of six and twenty-one who reside in the LaGrange Independent School District; that under the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas, defendants, and each of them, are charged with the duty of making available public school funds and public school facilities within the LaGrange Independent School District for the education of white and Negro children; that acting as administrative officers of the State of Texas, the defendants, and each of them, are in truth and in fact maintaining a public school system in the City of La Grange and in the LaGrange Independent School District which is supported by the levying, assessment and collec tion of taxes, including taxes from the plaintiff, imposed upon the resident citizens of the City of LaGrange and of the LaGrange Independent School District; and that the State of Texas has levied, assessed and collected taxes from this plaintiff and those similarly situated and for whose benefit this lawsuit is brought for the purpose of supporting the public free school system in the city of La Grange and in the LaGrange Independent School District; that such school system maintained by the LaGrange In dependent School District and the City of LaGrange, de fendants herein, is maintained on a separate, segregated basis with Negroes forced to attend one school exclusively and all other racial groups attending the other schools; that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitu tion of the United States and the laws of the United States, the defendants, and each of them are required to provide educational facilities for said children without discrimina tion because of race or color of said children. 9. That the school which Negro children are required by defendants to attend is known as the Randolph Colored 8 High School, the same being a combination elementary and purported high school. 10. That the facilities, physical conditions, sanitation and protection from the elements in Randolph Colored High School, which is the only school the defendants will permit Negro children to attend are inadequate and are not furnished with the equal facilities and equipment as the schools provided for by the defendants for the educa tion and attendance of white students and pupils in that the schools provided by the defendants for the education and attendance of white students and pupils are equipped as follows: Public address system; automatic electric signal clock; electric fire bell; central steam heating system; metal lockers in hall; a library consisting of approximately 3700 volumes; a complete workshop and teachers in charge of workshop with modern equipment and housed in separate buildings; chemical laboratory, and equipped with mod ern equipments and housed in two rooms; 2 concrete ten nis courts; swings for play service on outside of building for pupils; a gymnasium; cafeteria provided with movable tables and chairs. Said gymnasium being equipped with showers and locker rooms for girls and boys; and a school band and equipments for such band. And that none of the described facilities are furnished and provided in the school buildings and ground, provid ed and furnished for the education of Negro students and pupils in the school provided for the education of pupils and students of Negro blood and African descent; that the only library facilities, furnished for Negro students in the only school which they are permitted to attend, is approx imately 200 volumes, many such said volumes are merely 9 fill-ins and are not in current use in a standardized high school in the State of Texas and are of no value to the students. 11. That the defendants are now and have been for a long period of time prior to the date of filing this peti tion furnishing to the white pupils in the City of LaGrange and the LaGrange Independent School District, adequate facilities for education in a standardized high school, as provided for under the general laws of the State of Texas, and as hereinbefore described in this petition; and that the defendants have for a long period of time prior to the date of filing this petition, and are now refusing to fur nish such facilities to Negro pupils between the ages of six and twenty-one who reside in the City of LaGrange and the LaGrange Independent School District as herein before alleged. 12. That the policy, custom and usage of the defend ants and each of them have maintained inadequate, un sanitary and inferior schools and school facilities, as here inbefore alleged, for Negro children of the City of La Grange and the LaGrange Independent School District, while maintaining adequate, modern, sanitary and super ior school facilities for whites in the City of LaGarnge and the LaGrange Independent School District, as herein before alleged, constitute a denial of the rights of the plaintiff and his child to the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 13. That the plaintiff, Julius Brown, individually, and on behalf of his aforesaid minor child, and on behalf of the parents and all persons similarly situated, petitioned the defendants and each of them to cease their unlawful 10 custom, policy and usage of requiring Negro children to attend and use inadequate, unsanitary and inferior schools and school facilities, as hereinbefore alleged, while sup plying to the white school children of the city of LaGrange and the LaGrange Independent School District, safe, sani tary and adequate schools and school facilities, as herein before alleged in this complaint; that said petition was filed on or about the 5th day of December, 1947, and that such petition of the plaintiff has been ignored by the de fendants, and the defendants, and each of them, have con tinued and are now promulgating and enforcing their said unlawful practice, custom and usage. 14. Plaintiff alleges by virtue of such wrongful and illegal policy, custom and usage of the defendants, and each of them, that the plaintiff and his child of school age, and all Negro parents of children similarly situated in the City of LaGrange and the LaGrange Independent School District, are damaged; that they have no adequate remedy at law. Wherefore, plaintiff respectfully prays the Court: (1) That this Court adjudge and decree and declare the rights and legal relations of the parties to the subject matter here in controversy in order that such declaration and decree shall have the force and effect of a final judg ment or decree. (2) That this Court enter a judgment, order or decree declaring that the policy, custom and usage of the defend ants, and each of them, in maintaining and furnishing schools and school facilities for Negro children between the ages of six and twenty-one in the City of LaGrange and the LaGrange Independent School District which are inferior to those furnished to white children in said City and District is a denial of the equal protection of laws 11 guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Consti tution, and is therefore, unconstitutional and void; and (3) That this Court issue a permanent injunction for ever restraining the defendants, and each of them, and their successors in office from maintaining a policy, cus tom and usage of furnishing schools and school facilities for Negro children between the ages of six and twenty- one in the City of LaGrange and in the LaGrange Inde pendent School District which are inferior to those fur nished to all other children of said age group in said city and district. (S.) W. J. DURHAM, (S.) BEN N. RAMEY, Attorneys for Plaintiff. State of Texas, County of ............................ Before me, on this day personally appeared Julius Brown, who, after being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, states that he is the plaintiff in the above-entitled and numbered cause, and that the contents of said com plaint are within his knowledge true and correct. (S.) JULIUS BROWN, (Julius Brown). Subscribed and sworn to before me this the 3rd day of December, 1948. (S.) BOBBYE DURHAM, Notary Public, Dallas County, Texas. (Notarial Seal.) I do hereby certify that I have this the 3rd day of Feb ruary, 1949, mailed to Messrs. McGregor & Sewell, Second 12 National Bank, Houston, Texas, and to Messrs. Moss & Moss, LaGrange, Texas, the defendants attorneys of rec ord, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing amended bill of complaint. (S.) W. J. DURHAM, (W. J. Durham.) DEFENDANT’S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER. (Filed December 2, 1949.) (Title Omitted.) To the Honorable Judge of said Court: Come now the defendants, LaGrange Independent School District, Fayette County, Texas, L. D. Boelsche, President of the Board of Trustees of said District, and C. A. Lemmons, Superintendent of LaGrange Independent School District, in their official capacities and answering the Plaintiff’s First Amended Original Complaint in this cause would respectfully show unto the Court the follow ing: I. The defendant, LaGrange Independent School District, denies that it is a body corporate of and by virtue of and under the general laws of the State of Texas, and alleges that it was created by a special act of legislature of Texas, effective April 2, 1921, with all the rights, powers, privi leges and duties of a town or village incorporated under the general laws of the State of Texas for free school pur poses only, having certain rights to manage and control 13 the public free schools within the LaGrange Independent School District in Fayette County, Texas. II. In answer to Paragraph Number 2 of the Plaintiff’s Com plaint, Defendants deny that they have or are adopting, enforcing or maintaining any policy, custom or usage in maintaining inadequate, unsanitary or inferior schools and schools facilities for Negro children in the City of La- Grange and in the LaGrange Independent School District between the ages of six and twenty-one, while maintain ing modern, sanitary and superior schools and school fa cilities for white children in the City of LaGrange, Texas, and in the LaGrange Independent School District. De fendants further specifically deny that there exists any question with reference to any such practice, policy, cus tom or usage as is alleged to exist. Defendants further specifically deny that Plaintiff or his children have been denied equal protection under the laws of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. III. The defendants admit all of the allegations contained in Paragraph Numbered 3 of Plaintiff’s First Amended Orig inal Complaint. IV. In answer to Paragraph Number 4 of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Defendants admit that the Defendant L. D. Boelsche is President of the Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School District in Fayette County, Texas, and that the Defendant C. A. Lemmons is Superin 14 tendent of the LaGrange Independent School District in Fayette County, Texas, and that said school district is a body corporate by virtue of and under the special laws of the State of Texas, as alleged in Paragraph I above. The Defendants are without sufficient information to either admit or deny any of the other allegations contained in Paragraph Number 4 of said Complaint. V. The Defendants admit all of the allegations contained in Paragraph Number 5 of said Complaint. VI. The Defendants admit all of the allegations contained in Paragraph Number 6 of said Complaint. VII. The Defendants admit all of the allegations contained in Paragraph Number 7 of said Complaint. VIII. The Defendants admit the allegations contained in Para graph Numbered 8 of the Plaintiff’s First Amended Orig inal Complaint to the effect that the defendants are charged with the duty of maintaining a general and uni form system of public schools where tuition shall be free of charge to the children between the ages of six and twenty-one, who reside in the LaGrange Independent School District, and the defendants further admit that the said schools heretofore referred to are maintained by taxes which have been levied, assessed and collected with 15 in the district. All other matters of fact and legal con clusions in said Paragraph Numbered 8 are denied for the want of information and strict proof is demanded of same. IX. In answer to Paragraph Number 9 of the Plaintiff’s Complaint the Defendants deny that Randolph Colored High School is a purported high school and allege that on the contrary it is an accredited high school under the Laws of the State of Texas. It is likewise alleged that this school is a combination elementary and high school. X. Defendants deny all of the allegations contained in Paragraph Number 10 of the Plaintiff’s Complaint. XI. The Defendants deny all of the allegations contained in Paragraph Number 11 of the Plaintiff’s Complaint. XII. The Defendants deny all of the allegations contained in Paragraph Number 12 of the Plaintiff’s Complaint. XIII. The defendants deny all of the allegations contained in Paragraph Number 13 of the Plaintiff’s Complaint. 16 Defendants deny all of the allegations contained in Paragraph Number 14 of said Complaint. Wherefore, these Defendants pray that this Honorable Court enter its judgment and decree denying and refusing the permanent injunction requested by Plaintiff and find ing, decreeing and declaring that Defendants have not furnished and maintained schools and school facilities for Negro children between the ages of six and twenty-one years in the LaGrange Independent School District, which are inferior to those furnished white children in said dis trict; and Defendants further pray that the Court affirma tively find and decree that the schools and school facilities maintained and furnished Negro students within the La- Grange Independent School District are adequate and equal to the facilities furnished white students within said district; that defendants have judgment for their costs. (S.) MILES L. MOSS, (Miles L. Moss) LaGrange, Texas. (s.) d o u g l a s w. McGr e g o r , (Douglas W. McGregor) 905 Second National Bank Building, Houston 2, Texas. Of Counsel: MOSS & MOSS, LaGrange, Texas. McGr e g o r & s e w e l l , Houston, Texas. XIV. File Kennerly 12/2/49. The State of Texas, County of Fayette. 17 Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day per sonally appeared C. A. Lemmons, who, having been duly sworn, upon oath, states that he is one of the Defendants in the above entitled and numbered cause and that he is duly authorized to make this affidavit for and in behalf of the other defendants in said cause, and that the mat ters and statements of fact contained in the foregoing First Amended Answer of the Defendants are true and correct. (S.) C. A. LEMMONS. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this 30 day of No vember, A. D., 1949. (S.) NORMA H. LOESSIN, (Seal) Notary Public in and for Fa yette County, Texas. (Rubber Stamp) NORMA H. LOESSIN, Notary Public, Fayette County, Texas. Served on Durham by U. S. Mail. (s.) d o u g l a s w. m c g r e g o r . 18 TRANSCRIPT OF EVIDENCE. In the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. Julius Brown, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action 4223. Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School District, LaGrange, Texas, and the LaGrange Inde pendent School Districts, a body corporate, L. D. Boelsche, President of said Board, and C. A. Lem mons, Superintendent of the Public Schools System of the City of LaGrange, Texas, and of the said La- Grange Independent School Districts, and in their of ficial capacity, Defendants. * * * * * * * * Appearances: For the Plaintiff: Messrs. Mandell and Wright, State National Building, Houston, Texas, by Ben M. Ramey, Esq. W. J. Durham, Esq., P. O. Box 641, Dallas, Texas. U. Simpson Tate, Esq., Dallas, Texas. For the Defendants: Messrs. McGregor and Sewell, 905 Second National Bank Building, Houston, Texas, by Douglas W. Mc Gregor, Esq. Messrs. Moss and Moss, LaGrange, Texas, by Miles L. Moss, Esq. * * * * * * * * 19 The Court: The case on call on which there was an announcement this morning is Civil Action 4223, Julius Brown versus Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School District. The parties are still ready, I suppose? Mr. McGregor: For the information of the plaintiffs, there is one mat ter I neglected to state this morning. In assembling those records the duces tecum called for the various deeds in the possession of the School District. We are unable to find such deeds and have resorted to the County Clerk’s records and photostated those that we can find. This district is the product of certain amalga mations and growth and some of those papers apparently have been lost. Now to that extent we have the photo stats from the County Court’s records of those deeds, but we do not have the deeds. The Court: Any comment? Mr. Durham: No, sir. The Court: On what pleading is plaintiff going to trial? Mr. Durham: Your Honor, on the plaintiff’s first amended complaint, petition. The Court: When was that filed? 20 Mr. Ramey: It was filed, Your Honor, I believe, last week. Mr. Durham: November 22 is my recollection, Your Honor. The Clerk: That is correct. The Court: 1949. And what pleading is defendant going to trial on? Mr. McGregor: First amended answer filed December 2. The Court: December 6, did you say? Mr. McGregor: December 2. The Court: Do you want to have some witnesses sworn? Call all the witnesses on both sides and have them sworn. Mr. McGregor: May it please the Court, I prefer that the witnesses be called by name rather than a general designation, if you please. Mr. Ramey: Julius Brown, Otis Scott, C. A. Lemmons, Alvin Baum- bach, William Farris, J. C. Jackson, Mr. Hatch, R. C. Hick man, W. A. Kirk. 21 Mr. McGregor: Mr. Morgan, Mr. Hoffman, Mr. Boelsche. I beg your pardon, that is pronounced Boelsche. We have one other witness, perhaps two. They will be engineers, Your Honor, if we find that we need to use them. They are not here at the moment. And we may have other witnesses along that line, but I presume the Court will not force us to bring that type witness in at the present time. The Court: Any witness on either side may come in later if they are not here now. Swear the witnesses. (The witnesses were sworn.) The Court: Is the rule invoked? Mr. McGregor: The defendant invokes the rule. The Court. That means that the witnesses, other than the parties to the suit, will remain outside the court room but within call of the bailiff. You will find places out in the hallway to sit. Mr. McGregor: Mr. Boelsche, you are a party to the suit so you do not have to leave the court room, and Mr. Lemmons, you do not have to leave either. 22 The Court: You may state your case for the plaintiff, please. Mr. Durham: If the Court please, jurisdiction is alleged under Sec tion 24, Title 28 of the United States Code and Section 41. The Court: Section what? Mr. Durham: Section 24, Title 28, and Sections 41 and 43 of Title 8, 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and Section 274 D of the Judicial Code. The Court: You say Title 8 or 28? Mr. Durham: Title 8. And also 28, too, Your Honor. The Court: All right. I suppose there is no dispute about the juris diction? Mr. Durham: No. There are no pleadings attacking the jurisdiction, Your Honor. The cause of action is— Mr. McGregor: I might say that process has never been served on the defendant, but we will waive that because actually its agents are here. 23 Mr. Durham: Your Honor, the alleged cause of action is in the illegal discrimination in the operation of the LaGrange Independ ent School District in that certain educational facilities are furnished the students in the school maintained for whites and those same facilities or similar facilities or substantial facilities of the same character and kind are not furnished to the Negro students. The allegation, the cause of action alleged is to the effect that there has been purposeful discrimination in the furnishing of facilities for the education of the negro stu dents in the LaGrange Independent School District and that certain subjects are taught in the white school which are necessary and required in an accredited high school. That those subjects are not taught and have not been taught for many years in the school provided for negroes. That there are certain facilities, for instance, the lab oratory and an efficent library, work shop and facilities for playground and various other facilities set out in de tail which are furnished to students in the white school but are not furnished to negroes in what is known as the Randolph Colored School. And we allege that that sys tem of discrimination and refusal to furnish those facilities is based upon race and color. And we allege that the de fendants, as administrative officers or officers of the State of Texas, have been pursuing and intend to pursue that course in the future. We ask for a declaratory judgment and for a writ of in junction enjoining and restraining the defendants, their successors in office from further illegally discriminating against the plaintiffs because of race and color. 24 The Court: You are not complaining of segregation of the races? You are complaining that the negro race is not furnished with the same facilities and so forth as the white. Is that what you are complaining? Mr. Durham: I do not say we are not complaining of segregation. We say that the segregation statute as it is applied in this instance is unconstitutional, as it applies to this plaintiff. The Court: The reason I mention it is because you did not mention it in your statement. Mr. Durham: Yes, sir. Your Honor, we say that the segregation statute is unconstitutional as it applies to this plaintiff, and the man ner in which it is applied. The Court: I see. The defendant may state his case. Mr. McGregor: May it please the Court, we in effect answer the allega tions as made by the plaintiff herein and as I understand his pleadings, there is no issue made here, certainly from his prayer, on the question that you asked, the segregation question. In any event, we allege that under the laws of the State of Texas that such a system is set up in that separate schools are maintained in the state. We allege that it is a separate independent school district created by a special 25 act of the legislature of Texas in 1921, having the power, function, duties, of—that is, comparable to a town or vill age. Further, we answer that the school facilities afforded the negroes in the LaGrange Independent School District not only in most instances exceed but in all instances are equal, taking the school facilities as a whole in the district, and we deny and allege affirmatively to that proposition of the plaintiff. That is the case. The Court: Any further statements? Mr. Durham: That is all, Your Honor. The Court: You may proceed for the plaintiff. Mr. McGregor: There is one thing, of course, that the plaintiff’s counsel failed to call the Court’s attention to in his statement that I want the Court to bear in mind. That is, that this is set up as a class suit. The Court: You mean the plaintiff claims it for himself and those similarly situated? Mr. McGregor: He so alleges, yes. Mr. Durham: Call Julius Brown. 26 JULIUS EDWARD BROWN, was called as a witness on behalf of the plaintiff and, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. State your name, please. A. Julius Edward Brown. Q. How old are you? A. Fifty-two years old. Q. Are you married? A. Yes, sir. Q. Are you the father of any children? A. Father of seven. Q. What is your youngest child’s name? A. Youngest child’s name is Chloe Corine. Q. How old is she? A. Seventeen past. Q. Where do you live? Where is your home? A. Now? Q. I say, where is your home? A. My home is in LaGrange, Texas. Q. Do you own it or— A. I own it. Q. Do you pay taxes in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Yes, sir. Q. How long have you lived in the LaGrange Indepen dent School District? A. I have lived there—I have owned my own property five years. Q. How long did you live there before you owned your property? A. I lived there 16 years. 27 Q. Did your children attend school in the LaGrange Independent School District up until the year 1948? A. Well, excusing some time while I was on the edge of town, but after I got in the district my kids been going for the last 12 years. Q. Are you employed now? A. I am. Q. Where are you employed? A. I am employed at Port Lavaca. Q. How long have you been employed in Port Lavaca? A. Since June 5. Q. Now, were you employed in Fort Worth a short time after and during 1948? A. I was. Q. Now, during practically all of the time that you lived in the LaGrange Independent School District have you worked away from LaGrange and lived in LaGrange? A. Yes, sir. Q. Have you your household furniture now in La Grange? A. Yes, sir. Mr. McGregor: I dislike to object to leading questions, but— The Court: Do not lead him, Counsel. Q. State whether or not you have maintained the home in LaGrange Independent School District since you pur chased your home five years ago? A. I have stayed there, yes, sir. Q. Is that your homestead? A. That is my homestead. Q. Now where is your youngest child going to school now? 28 A. At Fort Worth. Q. Now, before you went to Fort Worth did you know Mr. C. A. Lemmons, the superintendent of the LaGrange Independent School District? A. I did. Q. Did you have any conversation with Mr. C. A. Lemmons as superintendent of the LaGrange School Dis trict with reference to certain subjects being taught your two children? A. I did. Q. What were the names of those two children? A. Chloe Corine and Vivian Alpha. Q. Were they then attending what is known as the Randolph High School for Colored in LaGrange? A. They were. Q. What subjects, if any, did you talk to Mr. Lem mons about? A. Chemistry and biology were the two subjects. Q. Were you familiar with the colored school at that time and the facilities therein? A. I was. Q. Was there a chemical laboratory in the school? A. No, sir. Q. Did you talk to Mr. Lemmons about your child taking chemistry, or your children? A. I did, my child. Q. Tell the Court what you said to Mr. Lemmons as superintendent and what he said to you, if anything, with reference to the subject of chemistry being taught your child? A. He asked me when I talked to him, was there any thing I had to say. I told him I did. He said what was it. I said, it seems they don’t have any convenience at the school now to teach my child. After they have dismissed their children in the evening would they mind to drill 29 my kid over her subjects which she is now neglecting, be fore she goes to Prairie View. He said, are you expecting to send her to Prairie View? I said I did. He said, what subjects are they? I said, chemistry and biology. Q. Did Mr. Lemmons furnish a teacher or a laboratory for your children to be taught cheimstry? A. Not as I know of. Q. Well, was one placed in the school, the colored school? A. A teacher was placed there. Q. Was a laboratory placed there? A. No, sir. Q. Then in order to obtain a training for your children in chemistry, where did you send them? A. To Fort Worth, I. M. Terrell School. Q. Do you pay for that? A. No, sir. We was to pay for it but since my wife would have to go there to keep from paying for it, we moved to Fort Worth temporarily to be with the children when they went to school. Q. You did not want to send your children up there alone? A. No, sir. Q. And you intend, as soon as your child has com pleted school, to go back to LaGrange? A. That is right. Q. Now were you familiar with the playground of the Randolph Colored School? A. I am. Mr. McGregor: May I ask this witness a question on voir dire for a moment? The Court: Yes. 30 (By Mr. McGregor): Q. When was the last time you saw it, Mr. Brown? A. Last time I saw the playground? Q. Yes. A. This coming Wednesday will be three weeks ago. Mr. McGregor: All right, go ahead. Q. Will you please describe the playground and what facilities, if any, are there on the playground and were there three weeks ago. Now, that is, the negro school. A. Well, I never saw much. No more than the sand hills were there then and are there now, and what little playground they have must be back towards—there is a colored fellow has a home there—if any. Q. Now have you had occasion in the last three or four weeks to go in the building? A. I have not gone in there. Q. You have not been in the building? A. I have not, not yet. Q. Now, do you know Vivian Alpha Brown? A. Do I know her? Q. Yes. A. I ought to, she is my child. Mr. Durham: We pass the witness, Your Honor. Cross Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. Where were you born, Mr. Brown? A. In Fayette County. Q. And where in Fayette County? 31 A. Well, I was born out about seven miles in the country from LaGrange. Q. What year were you married? A. I married in 1919 on the sixteenth day of February. Q. Where? A. Married at Katy, Texas. Q. And where did you live that year? A. 1919? Q. Yes. A. I stayed half of the year in Katy, Texas, and lived the other half in Williamson County. Q. Where did your wife come from? A. Born in Winchester, Texas. Q. Where is that? A. About 16 or 18 miles from LaGrange, northwest. Q. Was her father a farmer? A. He was. Q. Did he own property in LaGrange, too? A. He has. Q. As a matter of fact, this house in LaGrange was given to your wife by her father, wasn’t it? A. It was not. Q. How did you buy that house? A. With cash money. I bought it from Mr. Moorhouse. Q. The property is in your wife’s name? A. At the time being, yes. Q. But it was bought with your money? A. With mine and her money and the childrens’ money. Q. When was it that you left LaGrange after this conversation with Mr. Lemmons? A. I left there on the twenty-eighth of December, November, last year. Q. As a matter of fact, you went from LaGrange to Texas City, didn’t you? A. I worked in Texas City the whole while I was in LaGrange. 32 Q. Did you live down at Texas City? A. I worked down there and had to stay down there. I couldn’t go backward and forward. Q. Well, did you work there? A. I worked there. Q. Did you live there? A. I do at the time being. Q. Were your wife and daughter there with you? A. My wife and daughter was staying at LaGrange. Q. At that time? A. That is right. Q. When was it that your wife and daughter moved to Fort Worth? A. Moved to Fort Worth in—I am not positive of the time but it was directly after school term opened up. About three weeks after this misunderstanding came in La- Grange. Q. Now, in other words, they must have moved to Fort Worth sometime in January of 1948, is that correct? A. I am not positive. Q. Well, when did they move up there? A. Well, I don’t know when. Q. Well, did you move them up there? A. No, I didn’t. We did not move up there, understand. They went up there and stayed with my son. Q. I know you know the technical meaning of that now, but I just want to know when they went up there if you don’t want to say “moved up.” A. I wouldn’t know positively. Q. Who do they live with now? A. We have a house rented now. Q. You are now renting a house up there? A. Yes, sir. Q. And how long did you work in Texas City? A. I worked in Texas City better than three years. 33 Q. Were you working at Texas City before you had this purported conversation with Mr. Lemmons? A. I was. Q. You were. Now, after the conversation with Mr. Lemmons and after your wife moved to Fort Worth, how long did you work at Texas City? A. I worked at Texas City from January to twenty- eighth—twenty-seventh of November. Q. I will have to ask you to state that again. I cannot follow you. You worked when? A. From January, some time in January till the twenty- seventh of November. Q. Of 1948? A. Yes, sir. Q. And where did you go from Texas City? A. To Fort Worth. Q. And have you been in Fort Worth since? A. I have just left there two weeks ago. Q. In other words, from September 27, 1948, up until two weeks ago you have been working in Fort Worth? A. I don’t understand you. Q. Well, I want to see if I understand you. You stayed down at Texas City till September 27? A. No, sir. I said November. Q. Twenty-seventh of November, 1948? A. From January till November 27, 1948. Q. And then you went to Fort Worth? A. I went to Fort Worth. Q. Who did you work for up there? A. I worked for the—just in a minute. Give me a chance to think. I worked for Mr. Jack Weildman on North Main, used car lot. Q. How long did you work for him? A. I worked for him about a month, little better than a month. 34 Q. Well, you have been there now nearly 12 months. Where else did you work in Fort Worth? A. I worked for Sandberg Motor Company. Started on January 3. Q. Of this year? A. This year and worked up until June 1. I left there and I went to Port Lavaca and got a job and worked at Port Lavaca since June 5. Q. And you have been down at Port Lavaca since June 5? A. I have been working at Port Lavaca since June 5. Q. How many times have you been up to Fort Worth since June 5? A. I imagine I have been up there six different times. Q. Who are you working for at Port Lavaca? A. I. G. Audish Construction Company out of Hous ton. Q. This house in LaGrange, is it rented? A. The house I own in LaGrange, my son is staying in it. Q. What is his full name? A. Julius Edward Brown. Q. Same as yours? A. Same as mine. Q. Now, you said you took Vivian to Fort Worth and put her in school because she could not get chemistry at this school at LaGrange. Did she take chemistry at Fort Worth? A. She must do. Q. I am not asking what she must do I am asking if she does? A. Yes, sir, she did. Q. She took chemistry at Fort Worth? A. Yes, sir. Q. You know that as a fact? A. I know it as a fact. 35 Q. What was the other girl’s name? A. Chloe. She was not presently ready for chemistry. Q. Was she younger? A. Yes, sir, was not the grade this other one was. Q. And where is she in school now? A. In I. M. Terrell School in Fort Worth. Q. Do you own an automobile? A. Yes, sir, I do. Q. Where have you got it registered? A. In Victoria, Texas. Q. How did you happen to register it down there? A. I bought it there. Q. You showed that you lived in Victoria on that automobile registration? A. I bought it there. I can drive it there. Q. I am asking you a very simple question. Did you register that car in Victoria? A. I registered it when I bought it. Q. You have got a certificate of title on it? A. I have one but the man that loaned me the money holds the certificate of title until I pay him the money back. Q. What did you say on that certificate of title as to where you live? A. I showed that I live in Fort Worth. Q. I see. Have you bought any furniture on the install ment plan lately? A. I bought furniture in Fort Worth on the installment plan. Q. Did you sign an installment plant contract for that furniture? A. I don’t know what it was, but I signed a contract. Q. Where did you show on your contract that you lived? A. On the north side of Fort Worth, 3000 Prospect. 36 Q. I see. Who is George E. Brown? A. My son. Q. How old is he? A. He is twenty-three past. Q. I see. Where does he live? A. He lives on Refugio Street. Q. He lives at Fort Worth, 3113 Refugio Street, in Fort Worth? A. Right, sir. Q. Before you rented the house that you are living in now at Fort Worth, where did you live in Fort Worth? A. Lived with my son George. Q. At the address I have just recited? A. Yes, sir. Q. Have you got a telephone in the house where you live now? A. Not where I live now, there is not one in there. Q. Not one in there. Did you pay your poll tax last year? A. I didn’t pay that last year. I paid the year before that. Q. Where did you pay the year before last? A. In LaGrange. Q, I see. You didn’t pay any last year? A. Didn’t pay any last year. Mr. McGregor: I believe that is all. Re-Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. Do you intend to return to your home as soon as your girl finishes school? A. As soon as the little one in Fort Worth finishes school I am hoping to return back to LaGrange. 37 Re-Cross Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. You intend to remain in Fort Worth then until the younger one finishes school? A. Until the younger one finishes school. Q. What grade is she in now? A. She is finishing tenth grade. Re-Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. If Mr. Lemmons, the superintendent, had furnished a laboratory and teacher for chemistry for your child would you have moved temporarily to Fort Worth? A. Never would have. I would have stayed in La- Grange. Mr. Durham: That is all. The Court: Stand aside. Mr. McGregor: At this time the defendants move for dismissal on the ground that this plaintiff, alleging that he has an interest in this litigation, alleging that he represents class, that the evidence now affirmatively shows that he has moved away from the district and has been gone more than two years therefrom. That he has testified that the one particular child that he requested a specific course for has now finished school. That the other child is now in school at Fort Worth where he intends to remain until she finishes that school. And because of the reason that 38 it is evident that this plaintiff does not have sufficient interest to support a class suit for the members of class. We move that the case be dismissed. The Court: Anything you want to say about it? Mr. Durham: No, sir. The Court: I will take the motion with the case. Mr. Durham: All right. Call George Scott. GEORGE SCOTT, was called as a witness on behalf of the plaintiff and, having been first duly sworn, testi fied as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Mr. McGregor: I object to this testimony being admitted here for any purpose because of the motion which I have just recited in the record. The Court: Well, I will overrule the objection. Q. State your name, please. A. George Scott. Q. Where do you live? A. LaGrange. 39 Q. Do you live in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Yes, sir. I live just out from LaGrange about nine miles in the rural area from LaGrange, but I am in the LaGrange District. Q. Do you own any property in Fayette County? A. Yes, sir. Q. Real estate? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you pay taxes on it? A. Yes, sir. Q. You are a member of the negro race? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you have any children? A. Yes, sir. Q. How many? A. You mean in school? Q. Of school age? A. Well, at this time, now, I have only two in school, this year. Q. What are their names? A. Doris. Q. How old is Doris? A. She is about 16. Q. What is the youngest child’s name? A. George, Jr. Q. How old is George, Jr.? A. I think he is about 13. My wife always keeps track of those. I cannot tell you exactly. Q. Is he now attending the Randolph Colored School in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Yes, sir. Q. Mr. Scott, have you had occasion to go up to this school, the Randolph Colored School in the LaGrange In dependent School District recently? A. Yes, sir, I have. 40 Q. When were you there last? A. Well, it is about—week before last. I don’t know. Thursday or Friday night. They had a PTA meeting there. Q. Have you had an occasion in the last week or ten days to observe and see the campus of this school, the Randolph Colored School? A. Well, in part, yes, sir. Q. Do they have a playground there for the children? A. Playground is very poor. Q. Well now, the Court does not know about “poor.” Will you describe to the Court the condition as you ob served it of the school campus or playground? A. Well, they have a very small playground there for the children. Q. Is it sodded or rough or smooth? A. It is kind of rough. Q. Do they have any facilities like swings or things of that kind for the children? A. No, sir. Q. Have you had an occasion to observe the new Elementary School that has been recently built there for whites? A. No, sir. Q. You did not work on that school, did you? A. No, sir. Q. Now have you been inside of the Randolph Colored School recently? A. Nothing more than the gymnasium. Q, Will you describe to the Court what is on the in side of the gymnasium at the Randolph Colored School? A. Well, they have the kitchen in there. Q. They have got a kitchen in there? A. Yes, sir. Q. What else do they have in the gymnasium? A. They have what I would call it a balcony where they speak and one thing and another. 41 Q. A balcony? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do they have anything else in there? A. Some chairs. Q. Anything else? A. That is about all that I seen. Q. That is all that is in there. Now, your children are going to that school? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now, do you know whether or not the food is prepared there in that kitchen or is it brought from some where else? A. Well, I understand that the children say it is brought— Mr. McGregor: I object to that. Mr. Durham: A. Otherwise I cannot answer. Q. Now, do you know Julius Brown? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you go to Dallas with him? A. Yes, sir. Q. I believe that you and Julius Brown and several of the other colored citizens of LaGrange, Texas, came to Dallas and employed an attorney? A. Yes, sir. Q. What was the name of that attorney? A. I wrote it down but I don’t believe I have got it with me. Q. What lawyer did you talk with when you got to Dallas? A. Mr. Durham. Q. You colored citizens came up to Dallas and employed a lawyer is that right? 42 A. Yes, sir. Q. And this lawsuit was filed by Julius Brown for the colored citizens? A. Yes, sir. Q. In the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Yes, sir. Mr. Durham: That is all. Cross Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. May I have your full name, please? A. George Scott. Q. You have been living in Fayette County a long time, haven’t you? A. Yes, sir, quite a while. Q. Were you born there? A. Yes, sir. Q. Where were you bom? A. Out from-—down out from Ellinger. Q. Which way? A. Well— Q. Toward the river or up country? A. Well, it is south of LaGrange. Ellinger is south of LaGrange. Q. I say, were you born right at Ellinger? A. No, sir, it is about three miles—oh, must have been four and a half to five miles. Q. From Ellinger? A. Yes, sir. Q. Towards the river? A. Well, it is towards the river. Q. You leave the Columbus Road and go down to Ellin ger? 43 A. Going to Ellinger you leave the Columbus Road to the right. Q. You go off the right of it there and go down towards the river? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you go to school up there when you were a boy? A. Yes, sir, I went to school there. Not at Ellinger, another school before at Halstead. Q. And that is close to Ellinger? A. No, sir, that is closer to LaGrange. Q. That school is not in existence any more, is it? A. No, sir. That is in the LaGrange District now. They have torn the school down. Q. And all the pupils from down there where you used to go to school go to LaGrange, don’t they, all the colored people? A. Yes, sir. Q. And they are all brought in there? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now do you live in the town of LaGrange now? A. No, sir. Q. Where do you live? A. I live at what they call Blackjack. Q. Tell us where that is? A. That is out on the old road between eight and nine miles. Q. To the northwest of LaGrange? A. I would call it northwest. Q. Is that on the Giddings Road? A. No, on the old Flatonia Road. Q. Are you farming? A. Yes, sir, just a little. Q. Does the school bus come by your place? A. It does now, yes, sir. Q. I cannot hear you. A. Yes, sir. 44 Q. Is that for negro children, the bus that comes by your place? A. Yes, sir. Q. Pretty good bus, isn’t it? A. It is now. Q. Well, that is when we are talking about, now. A. Yes. Q. It is a good bus, isn’t it? A. Yes, sir, I think so. Q. And it is just the same as that used for the white folks? A. Just the same. Q. Yes. The same kind of bus, just exactly the same? A. Oh, yes, sure. Q. Are there any negro children in your neighborhood picked up by that bus? A. Yes, sir. Q. And they are picked up regularly and taken to school on time, are they? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now have you had occasion to go down to LaGrange in the last few days and see the Randolph Colored School? A. Yes, sir. I have been past it often but I have not been inside of the rooms since— Q. You have just seen the outside? A. Yes. I haven’t been in anything but the gymnasium. Q. As a matter of fact, that school has been under construction for the last 12 months? A. Yes, sir. Q. The Independent School District has been building a new school for the negro children? A. Yes, sir. Q. And it has been quite a sizeable construction pro gram, hasn’t it? A. Yes, sir. They have built a right good addition on to that school. 45 Mr. McGregor: I introduce at this time an elevation of the school prepared by the architect at the time of the construction. (The elevation of the school was marked as “Defendant’s Exhibit 1” and received in evidence.) Q. Now I will ask you—you recognize that, don’t you, Scott? A. Yes, sir. Q. That is a picture of the Randolph Colored School now at LaGrange, isn’t it? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you know what grades are taught in that school? A. Twelfth. Q. What? A. To the twelfth, I understand. Q. You mean from the bottom to the twelfth? A. Yes, sir. Q. They are all in there. By the way, when you were going to school there as a boy were all twelve grades in your school then? A. We didn’t teach that far. Q. You didn’t get that far? A. No, sir. Q. Now was it daytime or nighttime when you went to this gymnasium? A. It was night. Q. Were the lights on? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now they had big fine lights hung to the ceiling, didn’t they? A. Yes, sir. Q. And they were hung all over this magnificent gymnasium, weren’t they? 46 A. Yes, sir. Q;. And those light globes were protected with big screens so that the basket balls couldn’t hit those globes, weren’t they? A. I didn’t pay any attention to that. Q. Well, you saw it before, didn’t you? A. Yes, sir, but I don’t know, sir. I would not dispute that it isn’t. I didn’t pay that much attention. I was in a meeting anyway. Q. Well, it was well illuminated in the gymnasium, wasn’t it? A. Oh, yes, sir, it was fine. Q. Did you go back behind the stage to the bath rooms on either side behind the stage? A. No, sir. Q. Do you know that in behind the stage on either side there are shower baths and toilets and lavatories for the boys and girls? A. No more than what they tell me. Q. Well, did you go and see? A. No, sir, I didn’t. Q. Did you go in the kitchen? A. No, sir. Q. Now the kitchen had sound proof ceilings, didn’t it? A. Yes, sir, it was ceiled. Q. Very finely finished, wasn’t it? A. Yes, sir. Q. Beautiful kitchen, wasn’t it? A. Yes, sir, nice kitchen. Q. And the wall was yellow pine, tongue and groove, V-jointed, wasn’t it? A. Well, I can’t tell you that. Q. Well, you saw that wall? A. Yes, sir, but I don’t know the description of that. I am honest about that. That I didn’t pay any attention to, I will tell you. 47 Q. Well, it was a wood panel wall, wasn’t it? A. Yes. I know it is painted but I am talking about that I didn’t pay any attention to tell you just exactly how that is, but I will say it is nice in there. Q. And at one end they had a big deepfreeze, didn’t they? A. Well now, I don’t know, sir, about that. I didn’t recognize that. Q. And a large gas range on the other side? A. I seen the gas range, yes, sir. Q. And it had a big sink and dishwashing area on the other side of the room, didn’t it? A. I don’t believe I went that far. I went as far as the kitchen. Q. I mean inside the kitchen. Didn’t you see the sink in the kitchen and drying trays? A. I don’t believe I did. Q. Well, if you don’t remmeber, that is all right. A. No, sir, I don’t really. Now I know that the part I seen in there I noticed there were flies in there. You know, that didn’t look so good. It wasn’t screened. Q. Well, didn’t you go over and look in the corner and see the screens lying in the corner waiting to be put on? A. No, sir, I didn’t see that. Q. As a matter of fact, they are still working on the school building, aren’t they? A. I don’t know, sir. I saw them the other day carrying some benches up there, but I don’t know where they were from. Q. By the way, when your counsel asked you a while ago whether you worked on that job, you worked on jobs, didn’t you, once in a while? A. Yes, sir, but I didn’t ever work on that. I had been sick. 48 Q:. What kind of work do you do on a job like that? A. You mean to say like that job? Q. Yes. Your counsel said to you that you didn’t work on that job. If you work on heavy construction what kind of work do you do? Are you a bricklayer, a cement man, a finisher, a woodworker? A. No, sir. I can work cement. Q. Are you a cement finisher? A. I would not say I was a cement finisher. Q. Can you lay the reinforcing iron cement? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you do general carpentry work? A. No, sir. Q. Do you do any kind of steel work? A. No, sir. Q. Did you notice what kind of floor there was in that gymnasium? A. Well, it seemed to me like it is a hardwood floor. Now I would not say that for sure. Q. It has got a pretty floor, hasn’t it? A. It is a pretty floor. Q. And that covers the whole area where the basket ball is to be played? A. Yes, sir, it is all over that area. Q. And that gymnasium is about 140 feet long, isn’t it? A. I don’t know just exactly how many feet, but it is a good long one. Q. Plenty long? A. Yes, sir. Q. And it has a stage up at one end? A. That is what I was talking about. Q. That is what you called the balcony. That is the stage where the students can put on their plays? A. That is right. Q. And it has wings where the curtains can be put? A. It is fine. 49 Q. And it has places for the spotlight to illuminate the actors, hasn’t it? A. I don’t know, sir, I didn’t see that. Q. You are acquainted with this new modern kind of heating apparatus where they hang it on the ceiling and have a big electric fan to blow the heat down to where the people are? A. Yes, sir. Q. They have them blowing all over the place? A. Yes. But they cut them off that night. Q. And in the summertime they are better than the ordinary heating system because you can use the fans to cool the air. Mr. Durham: We object to that because there is no proper predicate laid. The Court: I think it is not improper cross examination. Q. In the summertime all you have to do is turn off the heat and then your fans act as circulators? A. Well, I haven’t used any of them and don’t know anything about them. Q. Was it a cold night when you were up there? A. It wasn’t so cold but they had the heat on and we couldn’t hear. Mr. Jackson went to cut it off. Q. Did they have it on for heat or ventilation? A. I don’t know. It wasn’t cold enough for heat. Q. Well, they probably just had it on for ventilation? A. Might have been. Q. You did not feel any heat coming out of it? A. No, sir. Q. As a layman do you know that they could turn those fans on and use them as a simple air circulator in warmer weather. Do you know that as a layman? 50 A. Well, I have seen it done in stores. Q. In what? A. In stores. I have seen that. Q. You had seen them used as circulators? A. But I don’t know anything about that myself. Q. I am asking if you ever saw them used as air cir culators in hot weather? A. Yes, sir. Q. George Livingstone has got one in his place, hasn’t he? A. I don’t know about that, but I know Mr. Rosenstein has got one. Q. Now that is a big nice entrance to this gymnasium over here, isn’t it, Mr. Scott? Over here on this side. That is a big nice double door recessed into the wall as you come into the gym, isn’t it? A. Yes, sir. You mean on the side? Q. Yes. A. Yes, sir. I seen two doors over there. Q. You went in that door, didn’t you? A. No, I went in the door there in the front. Q. You mean the door from the school house side? A. Yes, sir. Q. That is another thing. You can get to that gym nasium from all the classrooms without getting out in the wet, can’t you? There is a roof over every one of those walks to the door? A. I think it is, yes, sir, I think it is. I think this door on this far side you can’t get to do that. I don’t know. I don’t know, sir. I am afraid to say that. There is a roof around there, I believe, over that. Q. You think there is one over there? A. Yes, sir, but I didn’t pay that much attention. Q. What kind of bricks is this school built out of? A. Well, I cannot tell you that. 51 Q. Well, did you see it in the daytime? A. Yes, I have. It seems to me like—what I mean, I can’t tell you what kind it was. It seems to me like it was brick, you know, with those holes in them, you know. Q. This is a fully fireproof building, isn’t it, every bit of it, isn’t it? A. I don’t know. I would not be able to tell you that. But I noticed those bricks. Q. And the floors are all concrete and the walls are brick and masonry, aren’t they? A. Yes, and that looks very nice, really nice. Q. Now then, in this building there is another thing about it. Did you go inside and see that pretty patio between the two ells of the building, a little square place they have got inside where the outside corridors come all around it. Did you see that? A. No, sir, I don’t believe. Q. Did you walk into the school from the gymnasium? A. No, sir. I went in—you mean into the gym? I went into the gym on this side door here and we went in there and just before they taken up the meeting we walked into the kitchen. From the kitchen we came back and we had the meeting. Q. Did you, at any time during that meeting, go over to the classrooms and look at them? A. No, sir. But one room we did go in, the one that has the moving picture machine and he had the machine and they wanted us to see it. It was in a big room. He opened the big room and got it out. Q. You mean the place they call the library? A. Yes, sir. Q. You had to go around this little square place inside there to get in, didn’t you? A. Yes, sir. Q. That garden like arrangement in there? 52 A. Yes, sir. We went right by that little garden like place at the time. Q. And there was grass or it was seeded in there. Wasn’t there a sign on it which said to stay off of it? A. I don’t know about the grass, but the teachers said they had some flowers. Q. Now this library, did you go into it and look around? A. No, sir. We was just standing in the runway there and they brought it out in that little opening, four or five feet of space, and we looked at it right there. Q. Did you go in other classroom on this occasion? A. No, sir. Q. When was the last time you were ever in a class room at that school or have you ever been in one? A. I haven’t been in these new rooms they built at all. I went to the school and went in there and went to the teachers—where the teachers was. Nice office, but I haven’t been in. Q. You have not been in any of the new rooms then? A. Not any of the new rooms except the gymnasium. Q. Except the gymnasium? A. Yes. Q. When was the last time you were in any of the schoolrooms before. Now, by the way, these new school rooms are not entirely finished yet, are they? A. I don’t know, sir. Q. And so far as the present stage of completion that was just about finished in September, wasn’t it? A. Well, let me see, I am going to tell you, I don’t know when that school was—- Q. Well, did school open there this September? A. Yes, sir. It was put off two weeks on account of— Q. On account of what? A. Picking cotton, but it was some time in September. Q. But it was not put off on account of the building or anything. It was put off on account of picking cotton? 53 A. Yes, sir, picking cotton. Q. Now when you were up there the other night isn’t it a fact that between this entrance around here to the gymnasium and all down here there are still signs of excavating and digging along there in front of that build ing where the sidewalk is shown on here? A. I haven’t seen any digging. Q. You did not see any digging? A. No, sir. It was nice, anyhow. Q. Oh, it was nice. I see. Do you know what kind of heat they have got in that building, this one? A. No, sir, no more than those heaters that they have, you know, up in the roof there. What you was talking about a while ago. Q. You don’t know what they have in the rest of the school in the way of heat? A. No, sir, I don’t. I surely don’t. Q. Did you talk to any of the teachers while you were up there at the meeting the other night? A. Yes, sir. We was all in the meeting there. Q. Do you know anything about the teacher’s certifi cate, whether they have certificates of one kind or another? A. Well, I understand one of them— Mr. Durham: Your Honor, we— Mr. McGregor: I am asking if he knows. The Court: If you know of your own knowledge you may answer. A. One teacher there didn’t have it. Q. Who is that? A. Miss Simms. 54 Q. What does she teach? A. I don’t know, sir. She was teaching what you might say, exercises or something like that, but since one of the teachers got sick she been teaching her class, I under stand. Q. Oh, you mean just temporary? A. Yes, sir. Q. What do you mean “exercises,” Calisthenics? A. Yes, sir, I think so. Q. Oh, you mean she was the physical education teacher? A. Yes, sir. Q. That is what the big name is for it. A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you know any of the other teachers there? A. Yes, sir, I know of them. Q. Do you know of your own knowledge their quali fications? A. Well, no, not too much. They have all got degrees, but I don’t know what a degree is. Q. Well, you don’t know that of your own knowledge? A. No, sir. Q, Do you know what courses are taught in that school? A. I don’t all together know that. Q. Pardon? A. No, sir, I don’t all together know that. You will have to get that information from somebody else. The teachers, I guess, could tell you that. Q. Are you president of the Parent Teachers Associa tion? A. Yes, sir. Q. Pardon? A. We haven’t met but one night, but I do want to be a member of that. Q. You are a member or an officer. I cannot understand you. 55 A. No, sir, I am not an officer. I am just a member. Q. How long have you belonged to the Parent Teachers Association? A. I just met them one night. Q. That is the first time you have been there? A. Yes, sir, since it was organized there this year. Q. What was the occasion of it? This fine new gym where you could have a place to meet. Was that why you happened to get it organized this year? A. Well, I don’t know, sir, all together about that. The fact of it is I think they organized it just before the gymnasium was finished. I think they did. Q. Well, it was organized this year, wasn’t it? A. Yes, sir, they organized it this year. Q. And this school building has been under construc tion for more than 12 months, hasn’t it? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you lay any plans at the meeting the other night to buy any books for your library? A. No, sir, we didn’t get that far. Q. Did you have any discussion of it? A. No, sir. Q. Did you lay any plans to buy anything at all for the school at that meeting? A. Well, that meeting was called specially to see about buying a machine to have a picture show at the school. Q. Buying a machine? A. Yes, sir. Q. And there were groups there that wanted to buy a moving picture machine so you could have pictures at the school? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you decide to buy the moving picture machine? A. Well, they didn’t that night, but— Q. Have you since decided to buy it? 56 A. They haven’t called the next meeting yet. Q. You are going to have another meeting to see about it? A. Yes, sir. We are going to have another meeting. Q. Now, was there any discussion of purchasing any thing else for the school by the Parent Teachers Associa tion? A. Well, I did mention to the teachers that there was a whole lot that we could buy by putting on some en tertainment. I used to work for the Mothers’ Club of the white people there in LaGrange for a number of years, and I told them I learned a whole lot because they talked to me a whole lot about it. I used to wash dishes for them. I told them how they all would come and what they would have to sell and that way the money all would be clear, and I told the Principal that that would be a fine way to get at this, to do something for our school. Q. In other words, you knew that the Parent Teachers Association in this white school over the years had bought many things for that school or schools? A. Yes, sir. Q. And so you gave them the benefit of your experience with the Parent Teachers Association in the white school? A. Yes, sir. I mentioned to them also that I think we ought not to sit down all the time and just wait for the white people to do everything. We could show appreciation of what they had done by we doing something ourselves. And that is some of the plans that I mentioned. Q. Now this piece of ground that the school sits on, that is on a well drained hillside, isn’t it, Mr. Scott? A. Well, that is around a pretty bad place there especially when it is raining. It is sloped there and stays pretty wet. Q. Isn’t it a fact that in behind the school building there is a gradual rise of better than 5 or 10 per cent where the school grounds are well drained? 57 A. Yes, sir, but it drains right down to the school? Q. Down to the school? A. Yes, sir. Q. But all of the playground used by the children is in behind the school, isn’t it? A. Yes, sir. Q. And that is on a slope and is well drained? A. It is on a slope but all the drainage comes there, drains down towards the school and it is a wet place whe nit is wet. It is very wet there when it is raining. Q. As a matter of fact, the grounds around the school at LaGrange are wet when it rains and the school grounds there at LaGrange is wet when it rains? A. It is wet when it rains. I mean, it seeps. That gravel hill seeps to our school there. Q. I see. How many acres does this school sit on? A. Well, I don’t know, sir, exactly. Q. Five or six acres there? A. No, sir, I don’t think so. Q. I see. Have you, within the last three months, walked around behind the school there, on the play ground side? A. No, sir, I have not been around there. Q. You have not been there in the last three or four months? A. No, sir. Q. You don’t know what steps are being taken by the LaGrange Independent School District to begin to improve the grounds surrounding the school? A. No, sir. The Court: We will take a recess of ten minutes. (Short recess.) 58 The Court: Be seated. Mr. McGregor: May I proceed, Your Honor? The Court: Yes, sir, you may proceed. Q. Now, Mr. Scott, do you know whether or not this landscaping has as yet been put in or not? A. Whether it what? Q. This planting, do you know whether that has been put in or not? Do you know whether it is there or not? A. No, sir, there is nothing in front of it like that. The Court: Speak out. I can’t hear you. A. No, sir, I don’t know. What is that, a wall? Q. That is supposed to be, at liberty of stating what the picture portrays, that is supposed to be some shrubs. Are they there or not? A. I don’t know. Q. Were they there yesterday? A. I wasn’t there yesterday. Q. Were they there the night you were there? A. If they were there, I didn’t see them. I see some shurbs or something in that open place there. Q. And there are trees there, aren’t there? A. I don’t think there are no trees in front of it. Q. Now, this part of the walk is there, isn’t it, right in there to that entrance, the sidewalk? A. Yes, sir. Q. And this part of the walk back into this entrance is in there, isn’t it, the concrete sidewalk? 59 A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you say yes? A. Concrete sidewalk? Q. Yes. A. Oh, well, if you will allow me, it is a walk all the way. There is a porch across there. Q. So that much of it is already there? A. Yes, sir. Q. And do you know what kind of roof is on top of this building? A. No, sir. Tin, I think. I don’t know whether that is tin or not up there. The Court: Speak up. A. I don’t know whether that is tin or not on that building. Q. You don’t know whether that is tin or not of your own knowledge? A. That is tin, yes. Q. What you mean is, it is a metal of some kind? A. Yes, sir, sure. Q. And you don’t know what kind of roof is on that? A. No, sir. Q. Have you walked along in front of the building to see what kind of casements these are to hold these win dows? A. I think it is steel. Q. Do you know what kind of roof is on those two ells that come back here? A. No, sir. I think that is a galvanized roof, I think, on that building. Q. The ell part of this building is part of the old build ing? 60 A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you know when those two ells were built, the year? A. I know when it was built, but I can’t just call the year. Q. Suppose I suggested 1934 or 1935. Would that help you? A. Yes, sir, somewhere back that way, since Professor Randolph was teaching there. Q. Professor Randolph was a very eminent teacher, wasn’t he? A. Yes, sir. Q. That is what the present school is named for, old Dr. Randolph who taught there for years? A. Yes, sir. Q. These are classroom doors here, are they? A. Yes, sir. Q. And this entranceway here is an areaway where you can walk through to the other side, isn’t it? It is open. A. Yes, sir, that is open there. Q. It is a corridor that goes through there? A. Yes, sir, sure. Q. And that is what is called an outside corridor, isn’t it. Or do you know? A. I don’t know what it is called. It is an opening going through there. Q. Do you know anything about the entrance require ments to get into this school? A. No, sir. Q. This school has in the one plant both the Elementary Department of the LaGrange Independent School District for negro children and the High School Department, doesn’t it? A. I think they are using those rooms in the front there for— 61 Q. That was not quite my question. This plant, this whole unit, has in it the Elementary School facilities and the High School facilities, too, for the negro children, does it not? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you know what the requirements are to get into the high school section of it? A. No, sir. No, sir, I don’t. Q. At the Parent Teachers Association meeting the other night did you discuss the question of whether or not the school was being run on the State Plan? A. No, sir. Q. You did not discuss any of those things at that meeting? A. No, sir. Q. Do you know what the requirements are for gradua tion from the high school? A. No, sir. Q. Do you know anything about the text books that are supplied there, who supplies them? A. No, sir, I don’t know anything about that. Q. Do you know now what is presently taught in the school. That is to say, as to whether or not it is the regular curriculum that is taught in all the schools there in the district? A. Well, I don’t. Q. Of your own knowledge now I am asking you? A. No, sir, I don’t. Q. You don’t know of your own knowledge. Do you know the way the work is supervised in the classrooms of your own knowledge? A. No, sir. Q. Do you know anything about the number of books in the library here for this school? A. No, sir, I don’t. 62 Q. Do you know how books in the library of the La- Grange Independent School District have been purchased prior to the school year 1949-1950? A. No, sir. I wasn’t connected with that. Q. You had no connection with that? A. No, sir. Q. Have you even driven a school bus for the LaGrange Independent School District? A. No, sir. Q. Do you know anybody who does? A. Oh, yes. We have drivers there. Q. They have drivers there. Are they regularly em ployed drivers? A. Yes, sir. They are driving every day when school is on. Q. Now this school plat that is there before you, that is all on one level. There are no classrooms on an upper story there, are there? A. What do you mean by— Q. It is a ground level school. In other words, every classroom is on the ground floor? A. Oh, I think so. Yes, sir. Q. In other words, there are no upstairs classrooms? A. No, sir, no upstairs classrooms. Q. And all doors open out on the ground level as well as all windows? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you know how many teachers are employed in the negro plant of the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Well, not exactly, no, sir, I don’t. I don’t. That iy not connected with— Q. You have not had any discussions of the number of teachers in your Parent Teachers Association? A. No, sir. Q. Who is the present Principal of the Randolph School? A. Professor Hatch. Q. Hatch? A. Yes, sir. Q. A Mr. Kirk came to LaGrange on last Saturday a week ago and inspected the school facilities. Did you accompany him? A. Mr. who? Q. Kirk? A. No, sir. Q. A Dr. Christopher came to LaGrange Independent School District just about a year ago or maybe ten months ago and inspected the school facilities. Did you accompany him? A. No, sir. Q. On today a week ago Dr. Christopher came to La Grange and inspected the school facilities. Did you ac company him? A. No, sir. Q. Are you acquainted with Dr Christopher? A. I don’t think so. Q. Did you know Mr. Kirk? A. I met him once, sir. Q. Where did you meet him? A. Waco. Q. That is the only time you have ever seen him? A. That is the onliest time I have ever met him. Q. Did you ever see him in LaGrange, Texas? A. No, sir. Q. Did you ever see him in Fayette County? A. No, sir. Q. At the time you were in the gymnasium, the other night, in the kitchen, and you saw the facilities there, did you have any occasion to test them. That is, by turning 64 on the hydrant or using the gas stove or anything like that? A. No, sir. Q. Did you examine the equipment to see if it was functioning? A. No, sir. Q. You did not? A. No, sir. Q. Were there tables and chairs in the kitchen portion of the gymnasium on the occasion of the other evening? A. Chairs in there, and I think there was a table or two in there. I believe there was a couple of tables in there. I don’t know just exactly how many. Q. What kind of stove was it that was in the kitchen? A. What kind of stove? Q. Yes. A. I don’t know, sir, whether it was a gas stove or oil stove. Q. You didn’t examine it closer than that? A. No, sir. But they have a stove in there. I don’t know what— Q. Yes. When you said there were no screens on the windows there in the gymnasium, where were those win dows located that you were speaking about? A. We were in the kitchen then. Someone spoke about those flies on there. That is why I noticed that. Q. Flies on what? A. They was on the,—you know, the string or what ever it was that the light hangs on, what came down on the stove. And I think the reason I paid attention, I think Henry Jackson spoke and said he had told Mr. Lem mons about that and said he was going to screen them. Q. But you didn’t actually see the screens over there in the other corner? A. No, sir. 65 Q. Let’s go back to my question. Where were those windows you said had no screens on them. Were they in the kitchen you were speaking of? A. In the kitchen next to the outside—that last room. Some man was working on the Frigidaire at the time. Q. There was a mechanic working on the refrigerator at that time? A. Yes, sir. Q. That refrigerator was only just put in there, wasn’t it? A. I don’t know, sir, but he was working on it. Q. And those were ordinary outside windows about waist level in the kitchen? A. Yes, sir. On the west side of the gym. Q. That was a maple floor in that gymnasium, wasn’t it? A. I don’t know what kind of floor it was. Q. But you said you thought it was hardwood floor? A. It looked like a hardwood floor to me. It looked like a hard floor. Q. I see. A. I would rather say it was a hard floor to my judgment. Mr. McGregor: That is all. The Court: Any further questions? Mr. Durham: If it please Your Honor. 66 Re-Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. I believe you stated that when those blowers were turned on there was so much noise you couldn’t hear what was going on? A. No, sir, you couldn’t. Q. And you said the school site where the building is situated, in rainy weather the water drains from the other portion of the campus? A. Yes, sir. Q. And then the school building is sitting on the por tion of the campus where the water accumulates from the drainage? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now with reference to what has been introduced as Defendant’s Exhibit No. 1, I will ask you to tell the Court what portion of this entire building has been recently con structed? A. The gymnasium and these front rooms. Q. The gymnasium and these front rooms? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now the remaining portion of that building extend ing back behind the building, I believe it runs something like this. As this pointer comes to this board, is that right? A. Yes, sir, in that direction. Q. All right. Ngw, counsel asked you with reference to this outside corridor. I will ask you—state whether or not it is open on both ends? A. Yes, sir, it is open. Q. That is, no enclosure? A. No, sir, that is open. Q. I will ask you whether or not each of the class rooms opens out into this open corridor? 67 A. Yes, sir, they do. But I don’t know whether there is a top on that or not. Q. All right. Now each of the classrooms in the portion which you say has been recently constructed, there is an open corridor with no protection on each end of the corridor. There are no doors, no enclosure? A. No, sir. Q. And in leaving the classroom and going to the next classroom you come out of the classroom into this open corridor? A. Yes, sir, some of the rooms. Q. Yes, sir. And you go into the next room, is that right A. Yes, sir. Q. Now, counsel asked you if this building was fire proof. I will ask you whether a portion of these back rooms, these old buildings, if that is not wood, some por tion of it? A. Some portion of it. Q. I will ask you whether or not there is a complete frame building back behind this newly constructed por tion in which the agricultural subjects are taught? A. Yes, sir. Q. And I will ask you whether there is not a wood stove in that building for the purpose of furnishing heat? Mr. McGregor: I regret to have to object to leading questions but— The Court: That is a leading question. Objection sustained. Mr. McGregor: It is continually leading. Mr. Durham: Thank you. I won’t do that any more, your Honor. 68 Q. State whether or not, if you know, there is a frame building in behind this newly constructed portion which is used and is being used now for classroom work? A. Well, I don’t know exactly what class. They did teach class in there last year, but I don’t know whether they are teaching class there now or not. Mr. Durham: Thank you. That is all, Your Honor. The Court: Stand aside. Call your next witness. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, in order to save time, my associate coun sel was present when these exhibits were made. There are a number of exhibits we hope to introduce at this time and we will save time by letting him introduce them. He will take over. The Court: All right. Mr. Durham: Call Mr. Hickman. Mr. Tate: They are numbered, sir. Mr. McGregor: What are you going to prove by this man? Mr. Durham: That he is the photographer who took these pictures and that they are true representations. 69 The Court: Don’t look at them, Counsel, until they are offered in evidence and marked as exhibits. Mr. McGregor: Excuse me, Your Honor. All right, proceed. Thank you, sir. R. C. HICKMAN, was called as a witness on behalf of the plaintiff and, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. Tate: Q. Will you state your full name, sir? A. R. C. Hickman. Q. What is your business? A. Photographer. Q. And where do you live, Mr. Hickman? A. Dallas, Texas. Q. How long have you been in the photographic busi ness? A. Better than three years. Q. And did you acquire your skill by training or by experience? A. By training and experience. Q. Now, Mr. Hickman, did you have occasion to take some pictures of schools in LaGrange, Texas, on or about November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir, I did. Q. All right, sir. I show you this picture. What kind of camera did you you use, Mr. Hickman? A. Professional speed graphic camera. 70 Q. And what kind of film did you use? A. Super double X professional film. Q. And that is the ordinary camera and film for taking professional pictures? A. Yes, sir. Q. I show you Exhibit No. 1—• The Court: Counsel, you will have a record that is not understand able unless you have them marked as exhibits and state what the exhibit is. Mr. Tate: This is Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1 and that is the west end of the white high school. (Photographs were marked as “Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1 through 36,” inclusive, for identification.) Q. Mr. Hickman, I show you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 1. Will you identify that picture and tell the Court if you took that picture on the twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, at LaGrange, Texas? A. It is the picture I took at LaGrange, Texas. Q. And what does the picture represent, sir? A. It is the white high school. Q. And is that the whole high school or a portion of it? A. No, not the whole. Q. Just a portion of it? A. Sure. Q. And there is shrubbery at the end of that building. Did you get the impression that shrubbery had been recently put there? Mr. McGregor: I hate to object to leading and suggestive questions, but I must do it, and I must also— 71 The Court: That is a leading question. Objection sustained. Mr. Tate: We offer this in evidence, Your Honor. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1” was received in evidence, and is as follows:) Q. I show you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2, Mr. Hickman. Tell the Court whether you took that picture on the same occasion? A. On the same occasion I took this picture. Q. And what does that picture represent, sir? A. The white high school. Q. That represents the white high school. Is that the whole high school or one side of the high school? A. This is just an entrance. I presume the front en trance or the side entrance. Q. On the right of that picture there I see some swings, some devices. What are those devices? A. They are swings and see-saws, you know, for kids to play with. Q. On that same day, Mr. Hickman, did you have occasion to visit the negro school in LaGrange, Texas? A. Yes, I did. Q. And while you were there did you have occasion to walk around the campus there? A. Yes, I did. Q. Did you observe any swings and see-saws on the campus of the negro school? A. No, not of this nature at all. Q. I see. All right, sir. Thank you. 72 The Court: Are you offering this? Mr. Tate: I am offering that in evidence, Your Honor. The Court: Have you seen it, Counsel? Mr. McGregor: Yes, sir, I have seen it. Mr. Tate, you are going to get us all mixed up with two sets of marked exhibits. Mr. Tate: They are going in in the same order. Mr. McGregor: One'has the reporter’s mark and one does not. Mr. Tate: Those are the ones we are putting in evidence, the ones with the reporter’s mark. The Court: You are just offering those that have the reporter’s mark on them? Mr. Tate: Yes, sir. ( “Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2” was received in evidence.)' Q. I show you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 3. What does that represent? 73 A. This is also the white school showing the volley ball court in the foreground, the walk leading to the school, in front of it, trees and shrubbery on the right and also courts for playing games. I presume tennis or what have you. Q. Now, did you go on the campus— Mr. McGregor: I move that be stricken from the record. It constitutes a presumption that the witness has given for which he is not qualified and also it is not responsive to the ques tion. The Court: What particular matter are you asking to be stricken? Mr. McGregor: In reference to a statement that he assumes it is for volley ball or some sort of games. Q. Now, Mr. Hickman— The Court: Just a minute, Counsel. I doubt if that could be admissi ble, what his assumption is. Objection sustained. Mr. Tate: All right, sir. Q. Now on the left on that picture you see two posts with a net stretched between them. That is what? A. That is for playing volley ball. Q. On the right of the walk you see a wire screen on some posts and a court laid with cement. What is that? A. That is a tennis court. 74 Q. On that same occasion did you visit the grounds of the negro high school in LaGrange, Texas? A. Yes, I did. Q. Did you see a volley ball net on those grounds? A. No, sir, I did not. Q. Did you see a tennis court? A. No, sir, I did not. Mr. Tate: All right. Thank you. I offer this in evidence, Your Honor. ( “Plaintiff’s Exhibit 3” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 4. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. It is a corridor where lockers are and— Q. Just tell me what it is. A. It is a picture of the corridor, the hallway. Q. In what school? A. In the white school. Q. In the high school? A. Yes, sir. Q. Was it the high school or the elementary school? A. Well, there are so many of these, like, I wouldn’t just—to be frank about it I wouldn’t say whether it was in the high school or the elementary school, but I know it is the white school. Q. And at the right of the hall there you see several metal pieces. What are those? A. Those are lockers. Q. Did you visit the negro school on that day? A. Yes, sir. 75 Q. Did you go inside of the school? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you walk along the hall? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you see any metal lockers in the negro high school? A. Nothing like this, sir. Q. I see. On the left hand wall there are some racks. What are they? A. They are tennis racquets. Q. Did you see any such devices in the negro school when you visited it? A. No, sir. Mr. Tate: Thank you. Your Honor, I offer this in evidence as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 4. ( “Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 4” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 5. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. A chemical—I mean a— Q. It is a classroom, is that correct? A. Yes, that is correct. Q. And where was that classroom located, in the white school or the colored school? A. It is the white school. Q. Did you visit the colored school on that same day? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you see any similar classroom to that in the negro school? A. No, sir. 76 Mr. Tate: All right. Your Honor, I offer this in evidence as a pic ture of the book keeping room in the white school. Mr. McGregor: What was that exhibit number? Mr .Tate: No. 5, sir. (“Plaintiffs Exhibit 5” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 6. Did you take that picture on that occasion, Mr. Hickman? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. That is a music room. Q. And where was that music room situated, on the campus of the negro or the white high school? A. White school. Q. Tell the Court what you see in that picture. A. I see a piano, I see drums, horns and another in strument there. A cello, I guess it is. You play it with sticks, I know. Q. Did you visit the negro high school on that same day? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you go all over the high school? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you see any similar or corresponding room for the teaching of music at the negro high school? A. No, sir. Mr. Tate: Thank you. Your Honor, I offer Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 6, the music room in the white high school. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 6” was received in evidence.) 77 Q. I hand you Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 7. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that picture represent? A. That represents the school or the front of it. I guess it would be the front of it. Q. Is that on the campus of the white school or the negro school? A. It is the white school. Q- And is that a true representation of the object that was before you at the time you took that picture? A. It is. Q. Was it taken in a normal light? A. It was rather windy and sand was blowing that evening when I took this picture, but it is a true picture. Q. The outlines and detail of that building are not dis torted? A. Not distorted, sir. Mr. Tate: Your Honor, I offer Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 7, the new elementary school and the white school at LaGrange. ( Plaintiff’s Exhibit 7” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 8. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. This is a corridor also. Q. In what building? Is that a building for white or negro children? A. It is—I believe it is the negro school. 78 The Court: Speak out. I cannot hear you. A. It is pretty hard for me to remember exactly. Mr. McGregor: The answer, as I understood, Your Honor, was he be lieved it was for negro children. Is that what you said? A. I am not saying anything. Mr. McGregor: I am asking if that is what you said? Mr. Tate: I will ask the question. The Court: I would like to know what the witness said. What did the witness say? (The answer was read as follows: “It is—I believe it is the negro school.” ) Q. All right. That picture was taken in a school build ing in LaGrange, is that correct? A. That is correct. Q. I ask you if you found any corridor enclosed in the negro school? A. They were open. Q. Is that an open corridor? A. It is a closed one. Q. All right. Then I ask you to reconsider and tell the Court whether that is a picture of the white school or the colored school? A. It is a picture of the white school. 79 Mr. Tate: Your Honor, I offer this in evidence as the corridor of the elementary school for white children at LaGrange, Texas. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 8” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 9. Did you take that picture? A. Yes, sir. Q. Is there such a thing in photography as making a picture in reverse? A. Yes, there is. It happened in this case. Q. And that is a picture in reverse? A. Well, the only difference in a picture in reverse and the correct side is that the emulsion side or that the negative is actually turned over on the side to the emulsion on your paper. It doesn’t make any difference as far as the picture is concerned. Had there been writing on here, why the writing would have been backwards. But as far as the true photgraphy, this is just like it is. Q. And if you hold it this way up to the light you see a true and exact representation, is that correct? A. That is correct. Q. What does the picture represent? A. I— Mr. McGregor: I object to what the picture represents because it is now shown obviously that the picture is not a correct print and represents nothing. Mr. Tate: All right. If it please the Court, I will not offer that picture in evidence. 80 The Court: Objection overruled. Q. Is that a picture of the negro high school or the white high school? A. That is the negro school. Mr. Tate: All right. Thank you very kindly. Mr. McGregor: I object to it as it has been shown conclusively that it is a reversed photograph and cannot be a correct represen tation of the thing which it attempts to protray. The Court: Objection overruled. Mr. McGregor: Note our exception. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 9” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 10. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir, I did. Q. And what does that picture represent? A. That is the other end of the colored school, the front. Q. It is the front view of the colored school, is that correct? A. That is correct. 81 Mr. Tate: If the Court please, I offer Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 10, which is the front of the Randolph School for Colored Children in LaGrange. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 10” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 11. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir, I did. Q. And what does that represent? A. It is a corridor of the colored school or an open—I don’t guess you would call it a patio or something like that, but open. Q. But that is the corridor in the negro school at La- Grange, Texas, is that correct? A. Yes, sir. Mr. Tate: If the Court please, we offer Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 11, which is the corridor in the Randolph School for negroes at LaGrange, Texas. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 11” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 12. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. A classroom. Q, Is that a classroom or library. A. Library is what it is. Q. And on that picture do you see a lending desk for taking out books? A. Yes, sir. 82 Q. And do you see a desk for a teacher in the room? A. Yes, sir, on the left. Q. Did you go in the library? Is that the library for white or colored students? A. That is white. Q. Did you have occasion to go in the library of the school for negroes? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you see any similar equipment as you see in that picture? A. I did not. Q. Was there a lending desk? A. No, sir. Q. Was there a desk for a teacher? A. No, sir. Mr. Tate: All right. I think you. We present the Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 12, the library at the Senior High School for white students at LaGrange, Texas. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 12” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 13. Did you take that picture on that occasion? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. It is a classroom for little children. Q. In the white or colored school? A. White school. Q. Would you regard that as a classroom or a library? Mr. McGregor: Well now, Your Honor, this is an effort to cross examine this witness and to elicit by leading responses desired by counsel. 83 The Court: Leading question. Objection sustained. Mr. Tate: All right. Q. Did you visit any other classrooms in the elemen tary school for white children at LaGrange, Texas? A. Yes, sir, I did some. Q. Does that look like the rest of the classrooms in that building? A. No. Mr. McGregor: Well, just a minute. Q. In what—- The Court: What is the objection? Mr. McGregor: I make none, Your Honor. I beg your pardon. Q. In what sense does it differ from the rest of the classrooms? A. The books on the shelves and the larger tables. Q. All right. Mr. Tate: If the Court please, we present this as Plaintiff’s Ex hibit No. 13, which is the library at the elementary school for white in LaGrange, Texas. 84 Mr. McGregor: I don’t know whether the record reflects that or not. Counsel keeps repeating what the exhibit is supposed to reflect and I object to that being put in the record in that fashion because the record should reflect what the witness states and not counsel. The Court: When you offer it you can say what the witness said it was. Mr. Tate: Yes, sir. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 13” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 14. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. What does that represent? A. That is the white high school library, too. Q. Where did you take that picture? A. In the white grammar school, elementary, rather. Q. And did you take two pictures of that room show ing two different angles of that room? A. That is correct, sir. This is the other end of it. I see what the whole thing is now. Q. What is that picture now? A. That is the library. Q. In what school? A. The LaGrange Elementary School. Q. For colored or white children? A. White children. 85 Mr. Tate: I present that as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 14 as described by the witness. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 14” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 15. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. This is the typing room, is what it is. Q. In the white or colored school? A. This is in the colored school. Q. All right. And what else is there? A. It is a mimeographing machine. I imagine that is what it is. Mr. McGregor: I object to incorporating in the record his imaginations and move it be stricken. Mr. Tate: He is looking at the picture. The Court: Imagination is not what we want. If he knows, he can say so. Q. And along the walls do you see shelves there? A. Yes, sir. Q. Are there books on the shelves? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you go through the rest of the school, the negro high school? A. Yes, sir. 86 Q. Did you see any other room in which there were library books and shelves and tables? A. No, sir. Q. What room is that in the negro high school? A. It is the library. Q. I thank you. Mr. Tate: We present Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 15, Your Honor, as described by the witness. ( “Plaintiff’s Exhibit 15” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 16. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. Where did you take that picture? On the grounds of the white school or the colored school? A. I don’t remember which school that was, to tell you the truth. Q. All right. I will show you Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 17. Did you take that picture on the occasion of Novem ber 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. All right. Is Exhibit No. 17 on the grounds of the white school or the colored school? A. It is the colored school. Q. Now, does that help you to identify Exhibit No. 16? A. That is right. It is the white school. Q. And what do you see in that picture? A. I see exhibits on the wall. I see loving cups and big racks and magazines and all types of pictures. Q. On the wall do you see pictures of some pigs? A. Pigs and— 87 Mr. McGregor: I think the picture speaks for itself. That is the pur pose of introducing it. Therefore, I object to any fur ther description of it. The Court: I think he may question the witness about it, but the question, I think, was leading. Does he identify this as in the white or in the col ored school? Mr. Tate: Answer the Court. A. This is the white school here. 16. The Court: What number is that? A. P-16. The Court: And what is 17? A. 17 is the colored school. The Court: All right. Q. I show you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 17. Do you notice certain pictures on the wall? A. Yes, sir. Q. What pictures do you see? A. I see a picture of a pig and a horse. 88 Q. Do you know whether or not while you were tak ing pictures in LaGrange you took pictures of the voca tional agriculture room in those schools? A. Yes, I did. Q. Then in that picture, Plaintiff’s Exhibit 16, is that a picture of the vocational agriculture room in the white school? Mr. McGregor: That is obviously leading. It is an indirect way of getting in the evidence by building up a series of ques tions. The Court: I think that particular question is leading and it is overruled. Mr. Tate: If the Court please, we present this as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 16. ( “ Plaintiff’s Exhibit 16” was received in evidence.) Q. I again call your attention to Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 17. Will you tell the Court what that represents? A. That is the colored school. Q. What? A. The agriculture department. Q. The agriculture department. That is the voca tional agriculture department in the colored school, is that correct, sir? A. Yes, sir. Mr. Tate: If the Court please, we present item No. 17. ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 17” was received in evidence.) 89 Q. I present you with the Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 18. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. The science department. Q. Was that in the white or the colored school? A. That is the white school. Q. Did you have occasion to take a picture of the science department in the colored school? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you see any similar laboratory for the teach ing of science in the colored school such as that? A. No, sir. Mr. McGregor: Just a minute. The witness has not been qualified to answer that question. I object to it, and no predicate has been laid for it. Mr. Tate: All right, sir. Q. Will you tell the Court what you see in that pic ture? Mr. McGregor: Are you withdrawing the question then, Counsel? Mr. Tate: Yes, sir, I am. A. I see water connections here. I see drainage. I see all types of chemical jars that you store chemicals in, glass cases, you know, to store them in. I see 90 scales to weigh chemicals. I see tubing of all sorts and drawers. Q. And I call your attention to an open door there and the area beyond that. What is that? A. I will call it a storeroom for chemicals. Q. Will you identify that picture to the Court now? A. This is the science department for the white high school. Q. And when you visited the science department for the negro school did you see any similar facilities for teaching science? A. No, sir. Mr. McGregor: Same objection, no predicate being laid for it. The Court: I think that question is proper. Objection overruled. Mr. Tate: We present Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 18 as identified by the witness. ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 18” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 19. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what is that picture? A. It is a schoolroom. Q. And is that a picture of a schoolroom in the negro school or the white school at LaGrange, Texas? A. It is the negro school. Q. All right. What do you see in that picture? 91 A. Well, I see here that they have some kind of chemicals—I mean, not chemicals but some scales here and another device that I don’t know what it is. It is used in chemicals, I am sure. Q. You see a chart there? A. I see a chart saying “ Zoological chart,” and another chart saying “ Physiology chart, health, hy giene, safety and first-aid charts.” Q. Then is that a picture, to your knowledge, of the room for teaching science in the negro school? A. Well, this picture—no, sir. You mean teach ing science in the— Mr. McGregor: Well, just a minute. I would like to take the witness on voir dire for a moment. The Court: All right. (By Mr. McGregor): Q. Had you ever been to LaGrange School before? A. Not before I took the pictures. Q. Had you ever been to that room before? A. No, I had not. Q. Was the room identified to you before you took the pictures? A. No. We went in there and we— Q. Who is “ w e?” A. Sir? Q. Who is “ w e?” A. The Principal of the school. Mr. Tate: Point to the gentleman you want to identify. A. It is the gentleman over there. 92 (By Mr. M cGregor): Q. Is that where you got your information? A. No. I am looking at the picture and giving you the information. Q. How did you know what room that was? A. We were told. Q. Who told you? A. That man over there. Q. Mr. Lemmons? A. Is that his name? Q. The last gentleman there? A. Yes, sir. Mr. McGregor: No objection. Mr. Tate: We present the Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 19 as identified by the witness. (Plaintiff’s Exhibit 19” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 20. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you know whether that is on the grounds of the negro or the white high school? A. It is the negro school. Q. I present you the Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 21. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what do you see in the Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 21? 93 A. I see a few tools for teaching manual training, shop work. Mr. McGregor: Just a minute. I move to strike out the answer as not being responsive to the question. I also move to strike it on the ground that no predicate has been laid to show any experience, qualification and education. Mr. Tate: I withdraw all 'the questions and will re-ask them, Mr. McGregor. Q. You have in your hand Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 20. Did you take that picture on the occasion of No vember 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. Will you tell the Court what you see in that pic ture? A. I see devices for holding wood, I see chairs and a lot of tools, saws— Q. Do you see any power driven machinery? A. Yes, sir, in the back. Q. Now, did you take that picture on the grounds of the negro or white high school in LaGrange, Texas? A. That is the white high school. Q. And what does that picture represent, Mr. Hick man? A. The shop. Q. On the grounds of the white high school in La- Grange, Texas, is that correct? A. That is correct. Mr. Tate: Thank you. Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 20, if the Court please. ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 20” was received in evidence.) 94 Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 21. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And tell the Court what you see in that picture? A. I see two vices, a saw, a hammer, and a hat chet and plane. Q. Was that on the grounds of the negro or white high school at LaGrange, Texas? A. This is the colored school. Q. And what does that picture represent? A. A shop. Mr. Tate: All right, sir. We present the Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 21. ( “ Plaintiff’s Exhibit 21” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 22. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what do you see in that picture? A. It is a gymnasium. Q. And is that the gymnasium on the grounds of the white or the colored school in LaGrange? A. It is the white school. Q. All right. What does that picture represent now? A. Well, it shows the basket ball goal and some steps made there for seats. Q. And what do you think that building is used for? Mr. McGregor: Well— 95 Mr. Tate: I am sorry. Strike that, please. Q. What, to your knowledge, is that building used for? A. Playing basket ball. A gymnasium is what it is used for. Q. And that is on the grounds of the colored or white school? A. White school. Mr. Tate: All right. I offer Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 22. ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 22” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 23, Mr. Hick man. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And tell the Court what you see in that pic ture? A. This is a portion of the gym. Q. At the colored or white school? A. Colored school. Mr. Tate: All right. Thank you. We present Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 23. ( “ Plaintiff’s Exhibit 23” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 24. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? 96 A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that picture represent? A. It is the other end of the gym. Q. For the colored or the white school? A. Colored school. Mr. Tate: Thank you. We offer Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 24. ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 24” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 25. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. What do you see in that picture? A. It is a kitchen or cook stove and sink. Q. And is that on the grounds of the negro or the white school in LaGrange, Texas? What school is it? A. It is the white school. Mr. Tate: All right. I present Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 25 as identified by the witness. ( “ Plaintiff’s Exhibit 25” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 26. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. I did. Q. And what do you see in that picture? A. I see steam tables. I see a ramp for passing— getting your food. Q. And was that picture taken on the grounds of the negro or the white school in LaGrange, Texas? A. It is the white school. 97 Mr. Tate: All right. I offer Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 26. ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 26” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 27. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. What do you see in that picture? A. It is a lunchroom. Q. And is that on the grounds of the negro or white school in LaGrange, Texas? A. It is the white school. Mr. Tate: Thank you. Plaintiff’s Exhibit 27. ( “ Plaintiff’s Exhibit 27” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 28. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what do you see in that picture? A. I see a stove and a sink and an ice box. Q. And is that on the grounds of the negro or the white school in LaGrange, Texas? A. It is in the negro school. Mr. Tate: All right. We offer Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 28. ( “ Plaintiff’s Exhibit 28” was received in evidence.) 98 Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 29. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what is that? Tell the Court. A. It is a classroom at the white school. Q. In LaGrange, Texas? A. In LaGrange, Texas. Q. All right. To the right there in the wall there are three types of substances in that wall. Will you tell the Court what those three types of substances are? Mr. McGregor: I object to the testimony by counsel and move it be stricken. Mr. Tate: What is the basis of that? Mr. McGregor: You just testified there are three types of substances in the wall. I don’t know whether they are there or not. I don’t know that they are there. A. I am fixing to tell you. Mr. McGregor: I renew the objection. The Court: I suppose he means it is a leading question. I think it is leading. Mr. Tate: All right. I will withdraw the question, if the Court please. 99 Q. On the right hand of that picture there is a wall. Will you identify as many substances in that wall as you can from your own knowledge? A. The lower wall is a brick wall. In the center will be glass windows and at the top of the glass windows are glass blocks where light can come in, an even flow of light can come through that glass. Q. Is that what is known as glass brick? A. That is right. Q. And that is a classroom on the ground of the negro or white school in LaGrange, Texas? A. White school. Mr. Tate: All right. We offer Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 29. ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 29” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 30. Did you take that picture on November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that picture represent? A. This is a classroom at the white high school. You have the same type of room that I just mentioned in the other picture, with glass brick at the top of the windows and the windows in the middle and the brick on the bottom. And you have another classroom going through a door where—that was a bathroom where either room could use it, and it shows, the pic ture shows, you can see the teacher’s desk through the doorway and that doorway led to a bathroom. Mr. McGregor: I am going to move this all be stricken out as being, first, not responsive to the question. Secondly, there 100 has been no predicate laid to qualify this witness as an expert on anything except photography. Thirdly, he has not been qualified on his ability to compare rooms in a school or any other type of educational in stitution, nor has he been qualified on materials or structures of any kind or character. I move it all be stricken. The Court: Read the question and answer. (Question and answer read.) The Court: Objection overruled. Mr. Tate: Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 30, if the Court please. ( “ Plaintiff’s Exhibit 30” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 31. Did you take that picture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. This is the colored school. Q. Answer my question directly, sir. Is that a class room or what does it represent? A. A classroom. Q. And is that classroom on the grounds of the negro or white school in LaGrange, Texas? A. Oh, this is the white school. No, wait a minute. I am getting mixed up. 101 Q. Now take your time and look at the picture and see if you can identify it as being on the grounds of the colored or white school in LaGrange, Texas. Mr. McGregor: I think the question has been answered by the wit ness saying he did not know which it is. The Court: Well, he is still looking. A. This is the colored school. Q. Colored school. Now, Mr. Hickman, tell the Court what you see in that picture? A. I see desks, chairs. Q. And that is for children or grown ups? A. Children. Mr. McGregor: Objection to that. He has not been qualified as to furniture for educational institutions. The Court: Well, maybe he knows. Mr. MeGregor: Note our exception. Q. But that is a classroom on the grounds of the colored school, is that correct? Mr. Hickman, I hand you Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 32. Did you take that pic ture on the occasion of November 26, 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that picture represent? A. A classroom. 102 Q. Is that a classroom on the grounds of the negro or the white school in LaGrange, Texas? A. This is the white school. No, I have it wrong. Q. Now will you answer the question again, please? Mr. Tate: Strike that question, please, m a’am. The Court: No don’t strike it. A. After photographing so many pictures you can’t remember exactly until you look at them all at the same time. The Court: All right. Take your time. Q. All right. Is that in the negro school or the white school? A. It is the white school. Q. All right. Will you look at the wall in that pic ture? A. This one here? Q. Yes, sir. Will you tell the Court what substances are in that wall? A. It is just plain. Looks like it is wood. Q. Just look at it and tell the Court. A. You have windows going all the way to the top on this side. Q. All right. You will see those chairs and on the left hand corner of the picture those chairs appear dull. On the right hand corner they appear light. What is the cause of the difference in the color of those chairs? 103 A. Oh, it is—you have the reflection of light com ing through the windows which automatically adds to the amount of light I used in making these pictures and, consequently, it meant that more light was com ing in nearer to the windows than from the other part of the room. Q. Does that mean that sunlight was shining through the window? A. That is what it is. That is what I refer to when I say light. Q. Now, Mr. Hickman, I ask you whether or not that classroom is on the grounds of the colored or white school? A. Colored. Mr. McGregor: I object to that as a repetition, obviously leading. He has asked him two times before and he has an swered two times. The Court: Objection overruled. I would like to have the pic ture identified. I don’t know which one he is talking about. He has two there. Mr. Tate: This is Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 32 and he identifies it as a classroom in the negro school in LaGrange, Texas. Mr. McGregor: On the third time. Mr. Tate: I offer Plaintiff’ s Exhibit Nos. 31 and 32. 104 ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibits 31 and 32” were received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 33— The Court: Just a minute. The Court will adjourn until 9:30 in the morning. (Adjourned at 4:30 p. m.) December 6, 1949. 9:30 a. m. The Court: Be seated, gentlemen. Are you ready to proceed in the case on trial? All right. Mr. Tate: Call Mr. Hickman. The Bailiff: He does not answer. He is not here yet. Mr. Tate: If the Court please, if he is not here could we come to another witness and put him on again later? The Court: Yes. Why isn’t he here? Mr. Tate: I don’t know, Your Honor. He was advised to be here. 105 The Court: All right. Call another witness. Mr. Durham: Call J. C. Jackson. JAMES C. JACKSON, was called as a witness on behalf of the plaintiff and, having been first duly- sworn, testified as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. State your name, please. A. James C. Jackson. Q. Where do you live? A. Bay City, Texas. That is my home. I live in La- Grange now. Q. Are you now employed? A. That is right. Q. Where are you employed? A. LaGrange Independent School District, La- Grange. Q. In what capacity? A. Vocational agriculture instructor. Q. How long have you been employed in the La- Grange Independent School District? A. Going on two and a half years. Q. And what subject or subjects do you teach and have you taught since you have been employed in this school? A. Vocational agriculture, 1, 2, 3 and 4. Q. Now, will you tell the Court what facilities, aside from the text books, you have for teaching vocation 106 al agriculture in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. We had the usual set-up on the classroom. Q. Is that all? A. We had some vices. The Court: Some what? A. Vices. Q. Will you describe the vices you say you have. A. What I mean by a vice, it is something to hold metal or wood while we are working on it, and we have the clamps, the steel clamps to clamp wood work together or anything which you might want to hold as you work. Q. Anything else? A. I believe that is about all. Q. Now, do you have any practice teaching, any lands or grounds for practice teaching in agriculture? A. Practice teaching in agriculture? Q. Yes. A. Any lands or grounds? Q. Yes, for the negro school? A. I don’t know anything about it. Q. Well, are you using any lands in connection with your teaching of the negro children? A. Well, with the boy’s project, his parent’s land, we use that. Q. What do you mean by that? A. That is, a boy might use a project in growing corn and his parents will agree with me to let this boy—that is, an agreement between the three, to let this boy use this land and that is practice as far as I can see. 107 Q. Now I come back to my question. Does the school, as far as you know, furnish you any land or ground for the purpose of teaching practical agricul ture? A. It has not been as far as I am concerned. Q. Now are you familiar with the building used for the negro high school down in LaGrange Independent School District? A. I am familiar, more or less, with the shop. I am more or less out there all the time. Q. All right. What type of building is the shop housed in? A. It is a frame structure. Q. Is it a frame building? A. Frame building. Q. What kind of heat do you have in that? What is the heating system? A. We have wood heaters now. Mr. McGregor: What was that last word, Mr. Jackson? A. Wood heaters. Q. I will show you here what has been introduced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 16. I will ask you to examine that Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 16. I will ask you if that picture represents the physical objects and reflects the equipment that you have got in the agricultural room in the negro high school in LaGrange, Texas? A. Well, may I get that question again, please? Q. I will ask you—I will change it. Mr. McGregor: No, I object to his changing it and taking the ex hibit away from the witness when he has been ques tioned about it. 108 The Court: He can withdraw his question if he wants to. Mr. Durham: I will withdraw the question, Your Honor. The Court: The record will reflect what happened. Q. I will ask you to examine what has been intro duced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit 17. I will ask you now have you had occasion to examine it? A. Yes. Q. I will ask you if that is a picture of the room and if it reflects the equipment that is in the agriculture room in the negro high school at LaGrange, Texas? A. Well, it is a portion. That is, you have two tables here— The Court: Speak out louder. A. He has some tables here and a portion of our book rack and this reflects a portion of it. That is, the picture that he has here reflects that portion which he took. Q. All right, thank you. Now, what is left out of the niture in the work shop of the negro high school in the exhibits? A. Well, my desk, the bulletin board and, I think, some more of the lights, to be technical. Q. All right. Now, with the exception of your desk and the bulletin board which is not shown in that pic ture, that is all of the equipment and furniture that is in the agriculture room which you use for teaching purposes? 109 A. That is right. Q. Thank you. I ask you to examine what has been introduced as Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 21. I will ask you whether or not that represents the equipment and fur niture in the work shop of the negro high school in the City of LaGrange? A. Well, I can’t answer that because you don’t have all of the equipment there. The Court: I can’t hear you. A. I say you don’t have all the equipment appar ent here in this picture. Q. All right. Now what other furniture or fixtures do you have in that room other than and except that as shown in that picture? A. Well, we have quite a bit of woodwork tools in side of this place here that is not on here. Q. All right. Now what are those tools? A. Well, I don’t know just now. Q. Do you handle the shop? A. That is right. Q. Well, are you familiar with the tools that you have there, Jackson? Mr. McGregor: I believe I will object to that as leading I believe he has answered that question. The Court: Overruled. Q. I will ask the question again, Mr. Jackson. Do you know and are you familiar with the tools that you have to work with and teach with? 110 A. That is right. Q. Now what tools, if any, do you have in that room that are not shown in that picture? A. Well, we have end nipples, we have a lot of braces, end nipples, steel bits, spraying apparatus for spraying trees. We have—I will have to think now. We have several different types of saws. He has only the 8 point crosscut on here seemingly. We have some saws for pruning. We have pruning shears, four pair of those. We have a broad bit hatchet and any number of small 'things that are not indicated on the picture. Q. As a teacher in the Randolph Colored High School in LaGrange, Texas, do you have occasion to use the library in that school? A. I have occasion to send the students into the library. Q. Don’t you go into the library? A. That is right. Q. And do you visit the library often? A. Inasmuch as it is a part of the school I visit the whole place. Q. Will you tell the Court approximately how many volumes are in that library? A. I would not be able to. Q. Now, I will point to what has been introduced as Defendant’s Exhibit No. 1, which purports to be a drawing of the school building at LaGrange? Does that appear to be a drawing of the school building there for negroes? A. Well, it is. It appears to be to me from the— Q. Now, can you identify from Defendant’s Exhibit No. 1 what is this portion, that is, the portion to which I am pointing, is used for? A. Well, that is the face of the gymnasium, the brick structure of the gymnasium. Ill Q. What is in the gymnasium? A. What do you mean, what is in the gymnasium? Q. What do you find in the gymnasium? A. We have a usual gymnasium, the stage, the hot lunch department there, the cafeteria we call it, and chairs, tables, lavatory facilities and so forth, and that is about all, I believe. Q. You say you have a laboratory? A. Lavatory. Q. Lavatory, all right. Now what is the gymnasium used for? A. The gymnasium is used for Physical Ed pur poses. I am not to familiar with what the principal’s program is on that. Q. Well, you are familiar as a teacher with the facilities used in the gymnasium, aren’t you, Mr. Jackson? A. Well, not necessarily. Q. You have never used the gym in your school life? A. I have used the gym for a program. Q. All right. I will ask you whether there are any goals for basket ball in there? A. I don’t know. I don’t believe there is. Q. Is there anything else in that gym except the stage and a few chairs and the kitchen located in that gymnasium? A. Well, you have asked me that question. I mean, you asked me to tell you what was in the gym and I told you there were tables and chairs and so forth. Q. I thank you for that. I will ask you whether there is anything else in this gym except the kitchen, a few chairs and the stage? A. The kitchen, a few chairs and the stage. Q. And lavatory? 112 A. And tables. I believe that is all. Q. That is all it is. Now, is the food prepared in this kitchen here or is the food brought for the negro children from somewhere else? A. The food is brought over. Q. From where? A. From the white school to the cafeteria. Q. How is it brought over? A. I haven’t noticed that too closely. All I know, it is brought over. I haven’t noticed, really, the facilities. Q. Do you know how many times a day it is brought over? A. I think they bring it around once a day. Q. Do you remember what time of day? A. I am teaching at that time. I hardly noticed. Q. But no food is prepared in that kitchen, is that right? A. That is right. Q. Now, are you familiar with the laboratory in the negro school? A. The laboratory? Q. The laboratory? A. I am not familiar with it. Q. Is there a laboratory there? A. Well, I don’t know. The science teacher told me he had one. Q. You are teaching there in the school. A. That is right. Q. You have been teaching there about two years? A. About two and a half years. Q. And you are teaching agriculture? A. That is right. Q. The agricultural subjects, and you told the Court you don’t know whether there is a laboratory in the school where you are teaching? 113 A. Well now, the science teacher says there is a laboratory. Q. I don’t mean to argue with you, but— A. I understand. Q. I am asking you, of your own knowledge, do you know whether or not there is a laboratory in the school in which you are teaching? A. Well, I guess I don’t know. Q. Well, how many rooms are there in the school? A. I don’t know that. Q. How many teachers are there? A. I believe it is 18 teachers. Q. Are you familiar with any portion of this build ing, the picture of which has been introduced as De fendant’s Exhibit 1? Are you familiar with the interior of this building? A. Now which is Exhibit No. 1? Q. This is Exhibit No. 1. A. Yes. Q. All right. Have you ever been on the inside of that building? A. Of course. Q. All right. Now I will ask you if this portion here on the front of what has been introduced as Defend ant’s Exhibit No. 1, leading from the entrance here over to the extreme left, if that is not an open corri dor? A. It is an open corridor. Q. Now I will ask you if every classroom in this new portion does not open out into that open corri dor. Every classroom opens out into the open corri dor, doesn’t it? A. I believe they do. I believe they do. Q. And I will ask you to state whether or not it is a fact that students leaving the classroom, going from 114 one classroom to the other, must go out of the class room into this open corridor before they get into an other classroom? A. That is right. Q. That is true, isn’t it? A. That is right. That is true. The Court: I cannot get the nod of your head. Speak up so coun sel and I can hear you. A. Yes, sir. Q. Now with the exception of the restrooms for girls and boys in the gymnasium, you have two other restrooms in this school. That is correct, isn’t it? A. That is right. Q. One is for the boys on the extreme left here. That is at the back of the building? A. It is at the back of the building, that is right. Q. Now in leaving the classrooms here in front, in order to reach the restroom for boys, they must pro ceed through this open corridor and down back of the building? A. That is right. Q. And they are exposed to the elements and the weather in all weathers. That is true, isn’t it? A. They must go into this corridor or go out to reach the— Q. Which is open at both ends, and that restroom is on the back and they must go through an open space to get to the restroom? A. That is right. Q. And that is true for girls? A. That is right. Q. It is on the next end, is that right? 115 A. That is right. Q. Now I will show you what has been introduced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 23, and I will ask you whe ther that represents substantially the equipment that is in the gymnasium at the negro school? A. It does represent the equipment in the gym. Q. Thank you. Now, I hand you what has been in troduced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit 19, and I will ask you if that does not represent and reflect the equipment and furniture in the science room or laboratory in the negro school in LaGrange, Texas? A. Let’s see. I don’t know whether this-—I really don’t know. We have one or two other rooms resembles this. Let’s see. This is the science room. Q. All right. Now you say you have— A. Supposed to be the science room, I believe. Q. Thank you. Now you say you have one or two other rooms that resemble this room. Then you tell the Court that the laboratory in the negro school re sembles the ordinary classroom? A. Well— Mr. McGregor: What was that answer? A. I didn’t get his question. Q. Then you tell the Court that the laboratory, the room used for the laboratory in the negro school re sembles the other classrooms? A. I said we had some other classrooms— Q. That resemble this one? A. That resemble that. Q. And this is the laboratory? A. That is the laboratory. I see this back here and that is right. 116 Q. Then the laboratory in the negro school in La- Grange resembles some of the ordinary classrooms? A. Some of our ordinary classrooms. Q. Now what classroom does it resemble? A. Well, it has indications of our shelves where we put our books and the framing in there. That is what I had reference to, the general building interior. That is what I had reference to. Q. Now I present you here with what has been in troduced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 24. I will ask you if in that picture the kitchen in the gymnasium, if it is not reflected in that picture? A. The kitchen is reflected out of proportion. Q. I present you what has been introduced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 28 and ask you if that does not reflect correctly the interior of the kitchen? A. It does. Q. Now I will ask you if that is all of the furniture, fixtures and equipment that is in the kitchen at the negro school and reflected by Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 28? A. That is right. Q. I will ask you to hold Exhibit No. 24. I will ask you if the fixtures, furniture and equipment, includ ing the exterior of the kitchen, is not correctly re flected as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 24? A. I have answered that. It is plainly—- Q. Well, do you mind answering it again? A. It is plainly reflected here, the true structure of the kitchen. Q. Including the fixtures in the gymnasium? A. That is right. Q. And that is all that is there? A. That is right. 117 Q. Now I hand you here what has been introduced in evidence and identified as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 23. I will ask you to notice in such exhibit the tables across there. I will ask you if those tables are all of the tables used in connection with the cafeteria in the gymnasium in the negro school? A. You say these are all of the tables that are used? Q. Yes. A. I don’t think so. Q. Where are the other tables? Do you know? A. I think they are on the other side. Q. You think they are on the other side? A. Yes. Q. Well, all right. Now what type of heating sys tem is there in the negro school in LaGrange? A. The type of heating system? Q. Heating system? A. Well, it is gas blowers. It is gas blowing stoves that have the fans in them and they blow the heat out. It is gas heating, you might say. Q. Now, the high school and the elementary school is combined for negroes in the LaGrange Independent School? A. It is one building. Q. Now how many schools, do you know, do they have for white students, pupils in the LaGrange In dependent School? That is, how many plants, different plants? A. I don’t know. Q. You don’t know whether they have one or two? A. I don’t know because I don’t know anything about these Christian schools and so forth. Q. I am talking about the public school? A. Public school? 118 Q. Yes. A. Two. Q. Do you know whether or not the high school and elementary school are housed together or are they separate? A. They are separate. Q. Now, is the negro school, elementary school, separate from the high school or is it a combination of elementary and high school? A. It is a combination building. Q. Now you teach in what school, the elementary or high school? A. High school. Q. How many rooms are used and occupied for work in the high school in the negro building? A. I don’t know. Q. You are housed off from the main building? A. Yes, I am housed off from the main building. Q. Were you in the school system when the repair work was started on the negro school? A. I was. Q. When was that work started? A. I don’t know definitely. Q. Well, what year? A. I believe, I believe some part of 1948. I am not definite on that. Q. I don’t mean the month and the day. A. I say I don’t know definitely on that. I believe it was some time in 1948. I don’t know. Q. Well, all right. Now, when were you first em ployed? A. It was the second semester of 1948, I believe. Q. Had the construction and the repair on that building started when you were first employed? A. I don’t believe it was. 119 Q. And then you started on what date? A. It was the second semester of 1948. Q. And that was what month? A. I believe February. Q. February, 1948. All right. Now, what portion of this structure which appears, is shown in Exhibit No, 1, Defendant’s Exhibit No. 1, was in existence at the time you started to work there in February, 1948? A. It was the main building, that there, yes, the main building and the shop. Q. The main building and the shop? A. And the shop. Q. Now, has anything been done to the shop, that is, where you worked, since the date you started there? A. There have been improvements on the inside as to facilities, but the main building, no. Q. All right. Now, what facilities did you have when you started there in February, 1948? A. We had just the common desks and some few tools. From the pictures drawn on the walls it is indi cative that there were a lot of tools there, but when I came there were not many. Q. Now, the equipment that you have testified to previously this morning was put there since you started teaching? A. That is right. Q. All right. Now what has been done, if anything, to the exterior of the building that was standing there when you first went there and before the construction started? That being, back of this building? A. I don’t know. Let’s see. The exterior, the back of the main building you spoke of? Q. That is right. A. I believe it was something done on top of it once. They were painting or doing something and they 120 did some renovating or changing around the parti tions or something like that. Q. Thank you. Now all of the structure that is shown and represented by Defendant’s Exhibit 1 is the same old building that was there except this por tion across the front and the gymnasium. That is true, isn’t it? A. That is right. Q. How many rooms are in this front, newly con structed portion? A. There are four new classrooms in that newly constructed portion on the front. Q. And in each of those classrooms the students must come out into an open corridor in order to get to the next classroom? A. That is right. Q. There is no heat in that open corridor out there? A. There is not any heat out there. Q. Now, you say you have been in the library once or twice since you have been there. Do you keep any books in the library, any reference books with refer ence to agricultural subjects? A. There are some reference books. Q. You never go in there to get any of them? A. Of course, my boys do. Q. You do frequent there, Mr. Jackson? A. Sometimes. Q. I show you what has been introduced and identi fied as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 15. I will ask you if that does not represent the physical facts, the equipment and furniture in the negro library in the Randolph In dependent School in LaGrange, Texas. A. This just reflects a portion of the library. Q. What portion is it that it does not reflect? 121 A. There are some more shelves housing more books, some more books and the teacher’s desk and I believe that is about all. Q. Now you do remember the books now, don’t you. You remember there are some missing on that exhibit? A. There are some missing. There are some shelves with books on them. Q. All right. Now, tell the Court, please, approxi mately how many volumes are there now, the last time you were in there, in the negro library in the negro school in LaGrange, Texas? A. How many volumes? Q. Approximately. I know you just can’t count them. A. What do you consider exclusive—inclusive as a volume? Q. Strike that question. Do you know what a book is? A. Of course. Q. You know what a volume is? You know what a book is? A. Yes. Q. How many books in the— A. Well— The Court: Well, is the book bound or unbound? Q. Are those books bound in there? A. They are. Q. Now, how many bound books would you say? A. I would say approximately about, better than 200 . 122 Mr. Durham: That is all. Mr. McGregor: Just a moment. I would like to ask you a few ques tions, please. Cross Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. How many students do you have in your agricul ture class? A. I have about 38 students. The Court: Keep your voice up. A. About 38 students. Q. Do you have more than one period at which you teach them? A. I have more than one period that I teach. Agri culture 1, two hours. Q. In other words, you have two separate classes in that one subject? A. Two separate classes in that one subject. Q. Is that all that you teach, two classes, or do you teach other classes? A. I teach other classes, Agriculture 3 and 4. Q. In other words, the 38 students that you teach are divided between the four classes in agriculture? A. That is correct. Q. Now that course or those courses, rather, are given in a building which is in the back part of the campus of the negro school in LaGrange, I believe you stated. Is that correct? 123 A. That is correct. Q. And you have been there some two years. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 17, which was exhibited to you a while ago, and I believe you testified that presently there is a wood stove there or wood heat which is supplied for the pupils. Is it a fact that there is a mechanical heater there on the premises ready for installation? A. That is correct. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, we object to any declaration of any facilities or equipment as being of no probative force on the issues in this case. The declaration as to what is there ready for installation is of no probative force as declaration of facilities and does not satisfy the mandates of the Constitution. The Court: Objection overruled. I am not passing on your legal question. I am simply overruling your objection to the testimony. Q. Now, the building program that has been— The Court: I didn’t get his answer to that. Mr. McGregor: He said, yes, sir. The Court: There is other apparatus that has not been installed? A. Yes, sir. 124 Mr. McGregor: The answer was that there was a mechanical heater ready to be installed in the room but it had not been installed. Mr. Durham: I want to ask a question for the purpose of making an objection. The Court: All right. (By Mr. Durham): Q. You say there is another apparatus to install for heating. A. To be installed. Q. Now, do you have charge of installing? A. I don’t have charge of installing. Q. Do you know of your own knowledge that it is to be installed. Not what somebody told you, but your own knowledge? A. Of my own knowledge that it will be installed? Q. That is right. A. It is in there purposely to be installed. Q. Do you know of your own knowledge, indepen dent of what anybody told you that it is there to be in stalled? A. Well, since I am under authority— Q. Would you answer? A. I can’t hardly answer. The Court: Let him answer like he wants to. 125 A. Since my superiors are the people in authority and say it will be installed, that is as much as I can do about that. Mr. Durham: We object to that as hearsay. The Court: How big an apparatus is it? A. It is a large—oh, I guess about a four by six size mechanical heater, gas, to be installed. The Court: Is it new? A. It is new. It is cased. The Court: About how big and heavy is it? A. I venture to say maybe 90 or 100 pounds or better. The Court: I see. Objection overruled. I am ruling on testimony, not on any legal question. (By Mr. McGregor): Q. Now, in the examinations, Mr. Jackson, by Mr. Durham you were shown Plaintiff’s Exhibit 16. I will ask you if you have ever been in that room your self? A. I have. 126 The Court: What is that? Mr. McGregor: That is the picture of the room which was identified as the agriculture room in the school. Q. Now, are you familiar with what is in these racks here in that room? A. I am not. Q. Now are you familiar with what these certifi cates or awards may be? A. I believe I did check that once. It has to do with project achievements, I believe. Mr. Durham: We did not understand that, Your Honor. Mr. McGregor: He said it had to do with project achievements, as I understood him. Q. Do you know by whom those awards were given? A. I do not. Q. In Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 17, which has been identi fied as the agriculture room in the negro school, what is represented in the racks to the left? A. Well, we have typical agriculture bulletins and some agriculture text books. Q. Are those bulletins supplied by various agen cies? A. They are. Q. By what agencies? 127 A. A & M, and a building here in Houston, I come down here and pick them up. Q. Do you get those bulletins free of charge? A. Free of charge. Q. Do you get any number you like for your school? A. Any number. Q. Now, by the way, Mr. Jackson, are you a gradu ate of some college or university? A. I am. Q. What college or university are you a graduate of? A. Prairie View, A & M, Texas. Q. What degree do you hold? A. B. S. in agriculture. Q. Do you hold any other degrees? A. I do not. Q. Do you hold a teacher’s certificate or certificate in the State of Texas? A. I do. Q. What certificate or certificates do you hold? A. I have four years certificate now. Q. What was the first certificate you ever received? A. That was the same certificate. Q. And what does that entitle you to do in the schools of Texas? A. It entitles me to teach in the schools of Texas, school systems of Texas. Q. What do you mean when you say you now have a four year certificate? A. I have a four year—-the original certificate that I received was for four years and it is not expired yet. Q- In other words, might I interpret that to mean that you now have to get it renewed? A. It will have to be renewed for a permanent teaching certificate. 128 Q. For a permanent teaching certificate. Now, in the Plaintiff’s Exhibit 21, which I believe you identified as a portion of the shop, where is that room in rela tion to the room which is identified on Exhibit 17, Plaintiff’ s? A. Where is that room? Q. Yes. A. It is an adjoining room to this classroom. Q. I see. Now, in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 21 the south side of that room is not shown, is it? A. South side? Q. Well, let’s say the side next to the main school building is not shown? A. It is not shown. Q. Now this open door, what does that lead into? A. That leads into the tool room, the tool room. Q. And what did you keep in there? A. General woodwork tools and the tools that I made mention to at other times. Q. I see. In your teaching there in your agriculture courses, do you teach woodwork? A. We teach woodwork. Q. What else do you teach? A. General agriculture, such as farm shop, farm maintenance, that is, mechanical maintenance. Q. What does that cover, please? A. That covers plows, the practical things that the average boy would have to work with on the farm. Q. I see. There is still work under this improve ments system going on in this particular room in build ing and refurbishing that shop, isn’t there? A. It is if we have reference to the installation of this heating system, as far as I can say. Q. I see. Is the heating system to be in the room reflected in 21 or is it to be in 17? 129 A. I am not certain. Q. You are not certain about that. You have 38 students I believe you said. What is the average class? You have stated they were divided into four parts. A. The average class is about 12 or something like that. Q. About 12. Well, does that mean that your first year class is larger than your last one? A. Well, the average, I might say that average is a little better than that because I have a second year group which comprises most students and the first year and third and fourth year combination. Q. Then you must have more than 38 that you are actually teaching? A. Well, I do have NFA members. It is a national organization of New Farmers of America studying agriculture. We cannot have an agriculture class com prising 100 students but only, say, teach 50 NFA mem bers because of their qualifications to become an NFA member. Q. I don’t understand you. Are you teaching 38 students? A. I am actually teaching more than 38 students. Q. When you stated you were teaching 38 students did you mean students that were registered students in the school? A. I had reference to NFA students. Q. Where do the other students fall; what kind of classification? A. They are in the school. They are being taught similarly but maybe I didn’t understand the question. Q. Well, I am trying to get at how many you are actually teaching so far as the negro school is con cerned, your regular day-to-day students? 130 A. Regular day-to-day students is about 45, I be lieve. Somewhere like that. Day-to-day students about 45. Q. And those are the students that are going through the school all the time? A. They are continuously going to school. Q. And therefore your answer of about 12 to a class must have been about right? A. About right. Q. A good many questions were asked you about these outside corridors or passageways. There is a roof over all of these corridors, outside corridors and passageways, is there not? A. There is a roof. Q. And that roof runs from the extremity on each ell down to the portion of the building which crosses across here, does it not? A. That is correct. Q. So over each corridor there is a shelter? A. Over each corridor there is a top. Q. By the way, have you visited any of the new schools constructed here in Houston on the outside corridor principle? A. I have not. Q. Have you been to the new Wheatley High School here where all the corridors are outside? A. Not as yet. I have not visited it as yet. Q. The classrooms which go across the front of this building, I believe you testified, were all in use by the lower or what you would call the grammer school grades? A. I did not. Q. Well, do you know just what— A. Well, there are. Q. I see. 131 A. Used by the grammer school grades. Q. By the grammer school grades. Now you are acquainted with the system up there. Actually, those grades don’t move from room to room, do they? A. They remain constant. Q. They remain constant in their rooms and do not go from room to room. Now, I believe you were asked as to how many plants the LaGrange Independent School District was maintaining and you answered two, if I recall your answer correctly. The one where the white school was and the one where the negro school is. Don’t they operate more plants than that? A. Well now, the question I answered had reference to how many white school plants did they have and the negro school plants. I said two white and one negro, I believe. Q. Where are the two white plants located? A. I believe it is the old original building and then this new building. Q. Well, doesn’t the LaGrange Independent School District also have two other plants, one at Ellinger and one on the road to Giddings? A. No. In attempting to answer this question I had reference to his thinking of the schools within La Grange. Q. Well that is the reason I am asking you about it now. As a matter of fact, they also operate a school at Ellinger, don’t they? A. Operate a school at Ellinger? Q. And they operate one on the Giddings Road? A. I don’t know anything about the Giddings Road but I know about the one at Ellinger. Q. Now, when you said they had two plants there m the City of LaGrange, as a matter of fact the school you call the old plant and the new plant there for the 132 white children, they are right adjacent to one another, aren’t they? A. They are if you count about 50 yards or some thing like that as adjacent. Q. Yes. I don’t mean they are connected. I mean they are right adjacent to one another. A. That is correct. Q. And this cafeteria and other equipment that was exhibited to you, Plaintiff’s Exhibit No.— Mr. Tate: 25 or 26 or thereabouts. Mr. McGregor: I withdraw the question. Q. Now, this Plaintiff’s Exhibit 15 which I under stood you to identify as the library in the negro school, the teacher’s desk is at this end of that room, I believe you said, and not reflected in the picture. Is that cor rect? A. That is right. I said that. But I see that is ac tually reflected in the picture. I did not see the teacher’s desk there. The Court: Said what? A. I said that but seemingly the teacher’s desk is reflected in this picture. I didn’t notice that. Q. Well, the teacher’s desk is actually—at least one of them is there? A. That is one of the teacher’s desks. Q. It is reflected there. Now, there is another desk. Weren’t you right about it? Isn’t there another desk down at this end, at this end of the picture? 133 A. I can’t recall. Q. You can’t recall? A. I can’t recall. I remember this desk. Q. Now, actually, this is where the teacher sits when she is actually librarian and checks out the books, isn’t it? A. That is right. Q. Now, do you know of your own knowledge how this library has been acquired and how come it is maintained? That is, where the funds come from ? A. Well, I have a vague idea. I know— Q. Well, I don’t want an idea. I don’t mean to stop you abruptly. I am trying to ask you if you know how the books are acquired and where the funds come from? A. Well, I don’t. Q. Now, there is, in the top of Plaintiff’s Exhibit 15, what apparently is a heater hung from the ceiling. I will ask you if that is the type heater you were re ferring to a while ago that was to be hung in the shop where you are teaching? A. That is the type of heater that I had reference to. Q. I see. This particular room that is reflected in Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 15 is what is known, or rather, it is the old part of the present combined building, is it not? A. It is in the old part of the present combined building. Q. Yes. The galleries or corridors are all concrete in that building as well as in the new portion of it, are they not? A. They are concrete. Q. And these walls are all masonry walls in the old building as well as in the new part of the building, are they not? 134 A. This picture indicates that wooden structure there. Q. Excluding for the moment the wainscoting? A. The balance, with the exception of this wall in here, is masonry construction. Q. This woodwork that is here, this beaded wall, that is a part of the trim and not a part of the main wall, is it not? A. It is a part of the trim. Q. Now, in this library they are supplied with certain daily newspapers, are they not? A. I believe they do take the daily newspapers. I believe they do. Q. Those are the daily newspapers that are re flected in the picture, are they not, in the racks pro vided for them in the left side of the picture? A. It has papers reflected. I don’t know what they are. Q. Now then, on the other end of the room and around the walls there are several shelves other than those that are reflected there? A. That is right. Q. Have you been in the kitchen at the negro gym nasium that is reflected by Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 28? A. I have. Q. This wall is 1 by 4 V-joint yellow pine paneling, is it not? A. I don’t know now. 1 by 4 what? Q. V-joined yellow pine paneling? A. That is correct on that. Q. And the kitchen is in that type trim all around, isn’t it? A. Yes, all around. Q. The ceiling is accomplished by this new com position sound-proofing material, is it not? 135 A. That is right. Q. The windows are recessed and set in perpen dicularly to supply the largest amount of light, are they not? A. They are set in perpendicularly to supply light. I don’t know how much does come in there. Q. Now this picture does not show the other end of this kitchen which has in it a deepfreeze, does it? A. It does not. Q. And there is a deepfreeze in that end of the kitchen? A. There is a deepfreeze in there. Q. Plaintiff’s Exhibits 23 and 24 show from the back of the gymnasium first to one side and then the other side. That is correct? I mean that is the angle of the picture. A. That is the back of one side and this is the back upon another side. Q. Yes. In other words, 24 shows the method of setting in the kitchen on that side of the gymnasium? A. It does. Q. And this portion of the gymnasium is where it is set up and constructed for the playing of basket ball isn’t it? A. Combination basket ball and auditorium pur poses. Q. Dances and everything else you want to have? A. That is right. Q. What kind of floor is that, do you know? A. It is a hardwood floor. It is a regular basket ball or conventional type. Q. Do you know whether or not it is oak or maple? A. I think it is oak. Q. And it is beautifully finished and laid on the floor? 136 A. It is finished and laid on the floor. Q. Now, these heaters that you find hanging here and here at the back and in the middle are also found on 23 on the opposite side of the room for the purpose of heating? A. That is right, back, middle and front. Q. And also there is another heater on each side at the back which is not reflected in either 23 or 24 because they were behind the cam era? A. There are any number of heaters, I mean three or four more heaters not reflected in this picture, Plaintiff’ s 24. And in this picture, four more heaters not reflected in 23. Q. So between the two pictures there are four more of such heaters which are not reflected in either 23 or 24? A. That is right. Q. Now, in the ceiling of this gymnasium there are numerous objects that appear to be lights, for the purpose of lighting the gymnasium. Is that what those objects are for? A. These are lights and there are reflectors in the top. We have reflectors in the top and it cuts the sun rays and it helps the light, lighting purposes. But these are recent electrical lights put up. Q. And they are all screened, are they not, so that they will not be damaged or broken up? A. That is right. Q. In 23 and 24 I see on the respective sides of the gymnasium tables which you, I believe, have pointed out and I will ask you what those tables are used for, if you know? A. I have seen the tables used for different pur poses, eating purposes and classes. I see some teach ers—the physical ed teacher might take time out to have discussion around the table. 137 Q. But they are used for eating. Now, do you know about how many children are fed there every day at the negro school? A. I do not. Q. Have you ever been in the gymnasium where they are fed during the lunch hour? A. I have. Q. But you don’t know the daily average on the feeding? A. I have never questioned it. Q. I believe you stated that the food was cooked at the plant over where the old high school building is and the new grade school building is and brought to the negro school to be delivered to the children? A. I think that question was “ prepared” and 1 think I said it was “ prepared.” Mr. McGregor: I withdraw the question. Q. You say the food was prepared at that plant? A. I think that was the question directed to me at that time. Q. Do you know whether or not the kitchen in which it is prepared is in the old part of the building or in the new building? A. I don’t know. Q- You don’t know where that is. In Plaintiff’s Exhibit 19 which I believe you described as a science room or chemistry room there is in that room a series of what appears to be cabinets on the left side of that picture. Do you know what is in those cabinets? A. I have seen on the table in back some glass ware by going through occasionally and the science teacher is in operation, but I don’t know. I think it is supposed to house scientific equipment. 138 Q. But what is actually in there you do not know of your own knowledge? A. I don’t know. Q. Where do you take your lunch in the daytime, Mr. Jackson? A. It is variable. Sometimes in the cafeteria, sometimes home and sometimes in the little eating places outside of the campus. Q. You do frequently eat in the cafeteria in the gym ? A. Well, occasionally I do. Well, I would say three times out of a week I eat in the cafeteria. Q. Now, you have seen the bus system that is used to bring the children to school at the negro school, have you not? A. I have. Q. And you have seen the busses that are operated for the white school, have you? A. No technical observation, just to look over there and see the busses. Q. Do they look about the same to you? A. About the same. Mr. McGregor: No further questions. Re-Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. Mr. Jackson, there is no steam table at the negro school is there, in the kitchen? A. There is not. Q. Now, I believe you said with reference to Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 21 that you kept some of the tools in the work shop back in that little room, is that right? 139 A. The tools ? Q. The tools, and you have got shelves back there on which you hang your tools? A. That is right. Q. And all of the tools that are in the little work room are on those shelves? A. They are in the shop. Q. That is what I mean. A. They are in the tool room. Q. Either in the shop or in the tool room? A. That is right. Q. And in the tool room you have constructed your shelves along which to place or hang them on? A. That is correct. Q. I will ask you to examine Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 21 and tell the Court how many shelves you have got in that tool room? A. I think— Q. Look—pardon me. A. I think I have approximately five shelves in that tool room. Q. Now I will ask you to examine the exhibit with the door of the tool room open. How many shelves can you see? A. From this picture it is only one shelf to be seen. Q. How large is that tool room? A. That tool room is about, I will say, 5 by 8, 5 by 7 or 5 by 8. Q. And the shelves are built along in front of the door. That is true, isn’t it? A. They are not built along in front of the door. You mean on this side? The shelves are just about all over the place, narrow shelves and— Q. All over the place. Now, how wide would you say that door is? 140 A. That door is a normal door size, about, I guess, about 4, about a 4 by 7 or 4 by 6, Something like that. Q. And what would you say that the weight of that door is? A. 4 by 6. Q. And you said that the tool room is about 8 by 5? A. Yes. Q. And the door is open and that gives a clear view of the tool room, doesn’t it? A. That gives a clear view of that shelf. Q. There is only one shelf there? A. That shelf. Q. Now, I believe you testified with reference to your academic training in agriculture? A. That is right. Q. Where did you get your high school training? A. Hilliard High, Bay City, Texas. Q. Did you have the benefit of a laboratory in the high school there? A. I did not. Q. Now were you taught science in the high school? A. I was not. We were taught science, I mean, it was makeshift science. Q. You did not have the benefit of a laboratory? A. We did not. Q. Now, when you got to college did you continue in your course in science? A. Of course. Q. What school did you attend? A. Prairie View. Q. In your studies in science in college, did you have the benefit of a laboratory? A. Of course. 141 Q. Tell the Court whether or not you, as a student, received any benefit by having the benefit of a labor atory in connection with your science? A. It is obvious that the fact that I had a labora tory to work with I could have been better trained and as a result I got more out of having a laboratory to work with. Q. Now is it your opinion from your actual experi ence and study that in studying science that you are benefited or that it is of educational value to have a laboratory to work in? A. Of course. Q. And you have no laboratory in connection with the school down at LaGrange, do you? A. I don’t know. I said the science teacher told me that he is satisfied with the laboratory. Q. Yes, satisfied, thank you. Now in pursuing your curse in agriculture did you use the laboratory in connection with any of the studies in college? A. In college, I did. Q. Were you benefited by the use of the labora tory? A. I have answered that, yes. Q. Well, you don’t mind answering it again. A. Of course not, no. The Court: Well, there is no use asking him if you have asked it once. Q. You think that a laboratory in connection with instruction in agriculture is of educational value to the school? A. I do. 142 Q. Now, do you have any other vocational teachers in LaGrange School except yourself? A. We have the home economics teacher. The Court: What sort of teacher? A. Home economics, homemaking. Mr. Durham: That is all, Your Honor. Mr. McGregor: No further questions. The Court: Stand aside. We will take a recess of ten minutes. (Short recess.) Mr. Tate: Bring in Mr. Hickman, please. R. C. HICKMAN, resumed the stand and testified as follows: Direct Examination (Continued) By Mr. Tate: The Court: You were a little late this morning, weren’t you? Mr. Hickman: Yes, sir. 143 The Court: Don’t repeat that any more. Mr. Hickman: No, sir. The Court: All right, go ahead. Q. Now, Mr. Hickman, yesterday we were work ing on some pictures that you took on November 26, 1949. I show you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 33. Did you take that picture on that occasion? A. Yes, sir. Q. What does that represent? A. This is the girl’s washroom in the gymnasium of the colored school. Q. All right. Thank you very kindly. Mr. Tate: We offer this in evidence, Your Honor. (“ Plaintiff’s Exhibit 33” was received in evidence.) Q. I show you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 34. Did you take that picture on that occasion? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. These are the grounds of the white school. Q. And what is shown on there? A. In the center of the picture it shows the sta dium. To the left it shows the buildings of the white school and to the right is a barn used for—I see a cow in the barn. (“ Plaintiff’s Exhibit 34” was received in evidence.) 144 Q. I show you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 35. Did you take that picture on that occasion? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent, sir? A. This also shows the remaining grounds of the white high school. Mr. Tate: Plaintiff’s Exhibit 35. ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 35” was received in evidence.) Q. I show you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 36. Did you take that picture on that occasion? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what does that represent? A. This represents the grounds of the colored school. Q. In LaGrange, Texas? A. In LaGrange, Texas. ( “ Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 36” was received in evidence.) Mr. Tate: We pass the witness, Your Honor. Mr. McGregor: Do you want me to use 37 out of your series, Counsel? Mr. Tate: We are not using 37. Mr. McGregor: We are going to use it. If you want me to take it out of your series I will, or the one you have loaned me. Mr. Tate: That is quite all right. 145 Cross Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. I hand you a picture here which is marked Plaintiff’s 37, but which has not been introduced as Plaintiff’s 37, and ask that it now be marked as De fendant’s proper number, whatever it may be. (The photograph was marked “ Defendant’s Exhibit 2. ” ) Q. It now being marked Defendant’s Exhibit 2 I will ask you to examine that and tell me, please, did you take that picture? A. Yes, sir. Q. You took that picture. Does Defendant’s Exhi bit 2 illustrate a close-up of Defendant’s Exhibit 34? Mr. Durham: Your Honor, Defendant’s Exhibit 34 has not been introduced in evidence. Mr. McGregor: I beg your pardon, Plaintiff’s Exhibit 34. Mr. Durham: I was just trying to follow you, Mr. McGregor. Q- Is Defendant’s Exhibit 2 a close-up of Plain tiffs Exhibit 34? A. It is a closer shot than the Plaintiff’s 34 shot. Q. And what is shown in Defendant’s Exhibit 2? A. The stadium and the grounds on which you play football. It is the stadium and the football field. 146 Q. Do you know from what direction that picture was taken. That is, whether from the east or the west? A. I am not familiar with the directions in La- Grange. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendant’s Exhibit 2 at this time. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 2” was received in evi dence. The Court: That is the colored or— Mr. McGregor: I will get to that point later on. I think I may, with consent of counsel, state that it is used by both negro students and the white students. Mr. Durham: I think that is true, Your Honor. Mr. McGregor: We will prove it if necessary, but I think counsel will stipulate that if we ask him to. Mr. Durham: That is true. The Court: This is a close-up of the view portrayed in the other picture? Mr. McGregor: Yes, sir. 147 Q. Now, did you take any pictures other than— The Court: These two pictures you have just been talking about do not reflect the ordinary playgrounds immediately around the school. These are places where they play. Mr. McGregor: That is the athletic field, I think we would be safe in saying. The Court: For playing big games? Mr. Durham: Yes, but it does not reflect, as Your Honor says, the playgrounds adjacent to the buildings. Mr. McGregor: And that particular field is used by both colored and white. The Court: By big games, I mean games outside of the scope of the school. Mr. McGregor: No. I think we can stipulate they are used on inter mural games within the scope of the school. The Court: The point I am getting at is this, that when school turns out for recess these are not the playgrounds to which the children go. 148 Mr. McGregor: No, sir, it is not that. Q. Now other than the pictures that were intro duced here in the course of your examination did you take any other pictures in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. I took a picture that didn’t show. In other words, it was a faulty film in it, nothing on it. Q. But you have produced here today all of the pictures that you did take except the one that was a faulty picture? A. That is right. Q. And also except No. 9 which was not intro duced because the plate was reversed? A. I saw that picture here in the Court. Q. Well, I mean by that, that was one that you did take, too, but the plate was reversed? A. It was reversed. Q. I take it from that then that you did not take any pictures of the LaGrange Independent School Dis trict plant at Ellinger? A. At where? Q. Ellinger, at a place called Ellinger? A. I don’t know where that is. The Court: Is that a white school or colored school? Mr. McGregor: It is a white school. Q. You don’t have any pictures of that, you did not take any pictures of that? A. Well, I don’t know whether I did or not. I am not familiar with the thing. 149 Q, Well, did you take any pictures of any other school other than the two plants that are reflected in these photographs? A. No, sir. Q. So if there are other plants in the LaGrange Independent School District you did not take any other pictures of them? A. I don’t know them. Q. I know, but you did not—I want to be sure you did not take any more pictures. A. Other than what we have shown here in the Court room. Q. All right. Now, Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 1 and Plain tiff’s Exhibit 2 and Plaintiff’s Exhibit 3, you saw them as I went through them, did you? A. Yes, sir. Q. All represent an older building at a site where there is now adjacent to it, some 50 or 75 yards away, a newer building, do they not? A. I only did the photography work on the pictures on there. I don’t know anything about it. Q. I will ask you then you have before you Plain tiff’s Exhibit 7 and I ask you if that building in Plain tiff’s Exhibit 7 was not adjacent to the building in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1? A. It was to the right. Let me see, the— Q. I am not asking you now whether it was to the right or to the left. I am just asking you if it was right adjacent to it. I do not mean connected with it. A. Well, it is the grammar school. Q- I am trying to find out now, it is right adjacent to Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, 3 and 2, isn’t it? A. Yes. Q. Now, Plaintiff’s Exhibit 6, what part of the ground is that particular room on that this picture was taken of? 150 A. You mean where is the room located? Q. Yes. A. It is in the white school, is all I know. Q. Well, is it a part of either one of the buildings reflected in the— A. It is in the building. Q. You had better let me finish. A. It is in the building of the white school. Q. Well, is it in either one of the buildings which are reflected in Plaintff’s Exhibit 1 or in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 7? A. Well, I wouldn’t be able to say which one of those buildings. Q. Thank you. Now on Plaintiff’s Exhibit 11 do you recall in what direction your camera was facing when you took that picture? A. It is the front of the picture as you see it. The picture talks for itself. It is the front of it and that is the end of it. Q. I understand that now but was your camera facing east or west? A. Well, I don’t—I don’t know the directions fac ing that way. This is the outside here and there is a house over there shown in the picture. Q. Well now, on Plaintiff’s Exhibit 11 there is a corridor that comes in right here, isn’t that true? A. This is another walkway or whatever you might call it going to the left right in there. Q. Well, as a matter of fact, there are two of them, aren’t there? Isn’t there one on this side and then one on the other side? A. Yes, sir. Q. You didn’t take pictures of those other two corridors? A. No, sir. 151 Q. Now in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 36 there appears to be some substance playing across or going across the base of that picture. Do you recall what that was? A. Yes, sir. Q. What was that? A. Smoke. Q. And what did it come from, do you recall? A. Burning leaves or trash. There was a man out there. As you can see there is a cart there or truck. He was burning trash. Q. I see. Now in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 36 I see two wings or ells coming out towards the center of that picture and I will ask you to look at the center of Exhibit 1 and tell me if that is a continuation of the building that is shown by each of the eaves over the new portion of the Randolph School? A. Well, I wouldn’t be able to say that. I only did the photography work and that is what I did, and I only know about that. Q. On Plaintiff’s Exhibit 33 there is indicated there some destruction of one of the fixtures in that parti cular room. I will ask you if you know of your own knowledge when that destruction or deterioration or whatever took place there occurred? A. When it occurred? I wouldn’t know that. Q. I am asking you if you know, not whether you would know or not? A. I don’t know when it occurred. Q. Thank you. What day was it that you took these pictures, that is to say, the day of the week? A. The day of the week was on a Saturday. Q. And had you been there some ten months pre vious taking some pictures? A. No, I didn’t. Q. Do you know Dr. Christopher? 152 A. him. I have heard of that name but I don’t know Q. Do you know Mr. Kirk? A. Yes, sir. Q. Was he with you at that time? A. Yes, sir. Q. Were you back there on the Monday following the twenty-sixth? A. Back there on Monday? Q. Yes. A. No, sir. Q. You were not. At the time that you took the picture reflected in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 20 was there anyone in that room at the time you arrived there? A. I recall our going down to that room, Mr.—I mean the principal of the school. Q. I asked you one simple question. Was there anybody in the room? A. Not when the picture was made. Q. I didn’t ask you that. I asked you was there anybody in the room when you got there? A. I didn’t see anybody in there. Q. And so there was no one in there at the time you got there? A. I don’t understand you. Q. All right. Now, I exhibit to you Plaintiff’s Ex hibit 26 and Plaintiff’s Exhibit 27. You have shown us two pictures of structures on properties where they are adjacent to one another and which you have iden tified as the white school, and I will ask you where Plaintiff’s Exhibit 26 and 27 was taken, in respect of which building they were in? A. This was in the white school. This is in the cafeteria and this is the steam table. Q. Well, I say, what building were they in? 153 A. In the white school. Q. Well, there were two buildings there adjacent to one another, weren’t there? A. Yes, there were. Q. Now then, which one of those buildings was this? A. It was the newly constructed building. Q. In the newly constructed building. Thank you. Mr. McGregor: That is all from us. Mr. Durham: That is all, Your Honor. The Court: Stand aside. Call your next witness. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, the plaintiff desires to call Mr. Lem mons, one of the defendants, under Rule 43-B. The Court: All right. Mr. McGregor: What is that rule, Counsel? Mr. Durham: 43-B? The adverse rule. 154 C. A. LEMMONS, was called as a witness on behalf of the plaintiff and, having been first duly sworn, tes tified as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. What are your initials, Mr. Lemmons? A. C. A. Lemmons. The Court: How do you spell your name? A. L e m m o n s . The Court: All right. Q. Are you officially connected with the LaGrange Independent School District? A. I am. Q. What is your official connection, Mr. Lem mons? A. I am superintendent of LaGrange Independent School District? Q. How many schools are embraced in the La Grange Independent School District? A. Do you mean separate plants? Q. Separate plants, yes, sir. A. There are five. Q. How many of those plants are within the con fines of the city limits of the City of LaGrange or town of LaGrange? A. Three. Q. How many of those plants are used by negro students or pupils? 155 A. One. Q. How many of those schools within the city limits of LaGrange, Texas, are used by white students or pupils? A. Two. Q. How many of those schools are elementary schools, Mr. Lemmons? The Court: You mean within LaGrange? Q. Within the city limits of LaGrange. A. You mean for white or colored children? Q. Well, first, how many are elementary schools? A. There is one elementary school and one com bination elementary and high school. Q. Now is the separate elementary school used by negro or white students? A. It is used by white students through the first six grades. The white students from grades 7 to 8 are in the same building with the high school in the white school. Q. How many rooms are there in the elementary school used by white students? A. In the separate plants? Q. In the separate plants, yes, sir. A. There are 12 classrooms, a library room, a cafeteria, and a principal’ s office. Q. Then there are 14—15 rooms? A. Well, there are 12 classrooms. Q. The library, the cafeteria and the principal’s office? A. Yes. Q. That would be 15 rooms in the plant used as a separate elementary school for whites. How recent is the construction of that building? 156 A. That plant was completed between the fifteenth day of August of this year and the first of September. I don’t know the exact date. Q. The fifteenth day of August of 1949 and the first day of September 1949? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now, was there a building, a plant, in the city limits of LaGrange, Texas, where white students, both elementary pupils and high school pupils at tended at the time this construction was started in August, 1949? A. There was. Q. Was it in operation? A. Yes. Q. And for how long, Mr. Lemmons, had that school plant been in operation? A. I don’t know. The marker on the front of it indicates that it was completed in 1923 or 1924. Q. Thank you. Now how many rooms did that plant have? A. I will have to count them up. About 24 to 26 rooms. Q. About 24 to 26 rooms. How many classrooms did the building which is now being used as a high school and elementary school have on the date of the construction of the new elementary school for whites was started? A. Same thing. Q. Did they have 24 to 26 classrooms? A. I believe so. Q. Now was the principal’s office located there? A. Yes. Q. Was there any other building upon this ground, I mean, in connection with this plant? A. No. I included those other classrooms in the number I gave you to start with, I believe. 157 Q. 26. A. I believe so. Q. Now was the library housed in the building that was in existence and used by whites on the date the elementary school for whites was started? A. Yes. Q. How many volumes, Mr. Lemmons, did you have in the library in the old high school? Let me refer to it that way, please, for whites. A. Do you mean books furnished by the State or books that have been bought and put in the library? Q. Well, I am not particularly interested as to the source from which they came. I am interested in knowing the number in there. A. Well, if you consider the books that are fur nished by the State Department of Education and those which have been bought from different sources and put into the Public Library there, I do not know how many it would be. Several thousand. Q. Thank you. Now did you make a sworn report to the State Superintendent for the school year 1947- 1948? A. I did. Q. And did you list in that sworn report the num ber of volumes that you had in the library? A. I believe I did. Q. Did you list in that report the value of the school property that the school district owns? A. Yes, I did. Q. Did you list the amount of money invested in school property including furniture and equipment in the school used exclusively for whites? A. I did. Q- Did you list in that report the money invested by the School Board of LaGrange for property includ- 158 ing sites, building, equipment and furniture used by negro students? A. I did. Q. Now, you were requested in a subpoena duces tecum to bring a copy of that report. A. That is right. Q. Did you bring a copy of that report, Mr. Lemmons? A. I did. Q. May I see it at this time, please? Mr. McGregor: Counsel seems to have one. Why don’t we just use that? Mr. Durham: Well, we wanted to compare them, Your Honor. If he will identify this one, I have no objection. Mr. McGregor: All right, Mr. Lemmons, go and get it. Q. May I see the report, Mr. Lemmons? A. For 1947-1948. Q. 1947-1948, please, sir. Now I believe you said that there were several thousand volumes or books in the library at the white high school. That is the one that was in existence at the time the construction of the new elementary school which is now used by whites was started? A. Yes. Q. Now after the construction and completion of the elementary school for whites was there a library established in that school? A. In the new school? 159 Q. Yes, sir. A. Yes, sir. Q. How many volumes would you say, that is, bound volumes of books, Mr. Lemmons, would you say there are in the library for the new elementary school which is used exclusively by whites in La- Grange Independent School District? A. I don’t recall. There is probably—there is not over, probably 75, 100 volumes in that library now. Q. Now have you a laboratory in the white high school, in LaGrange? A. Yes, I do. Q. Now what is that laboratory equipped with, Mr. Lemmons? A. It is equipped with the regular laboratory equipment that is used to teach general science, biology and chemistry. Q. Is chemistry taught in the white high school? A. It is. Q. Is solid geometry taught in the white high school? A. Yes. Let me correct myself there. I don’t be lieve solid geometry has been taught in the white high school for the past two years. It is offered. If we get a large enough number of students requesting it, we teach it. Q. It is offered, though, in the white high school? A. Yes. Q. Now I believed you filed with the State Superin tendent of the State of Texas the list of courses that would be taught in the high school attended by white students in LaGrange and also the subjects that would be taught in the negro high school for the year 1947-1948? A. I don’t recall that. 160 Q. Will you check your records and see whether you did or not? A. The State Department of Education does not require me to file a list of the courses you are going to teach. Q. That you are offering, I mean? A. No, they don’t do that. Q. All right, thank you. Is trigonometry offered in the negro school in LaGrange? A. It will be. Q. I say, is it offered? A. If we have a demand for it. Q. Has it been offered this year? A. Not this year. Q. Is cemistry offered in the LaGrange negro school for the present term? A. It is. Q. Do you have a laboratory there? A. I do. Q. Will you tell the Court what is in that labora tory? A. We have, let’s see. Last year we bought some five or six hundred dollars worth of laboratory equipment and we have transferred laboratory equip ment from the white school as it is needed until we have enough equipment to perform the elementary experiments over there. Q. Will you give the Court in detail the instru ments and the chemicals that you have transferred to the negro school? A. No, I can’t recall that. Q. Now in making a transfer of school property from one school to another, you do keep a record of that, don’t you, Mr. Lemmons? A. No, we don’t. 161 Q. You don’t keep a record of school property? A. We do not keep a record of expendable prop erty, no. Q. You make no record of any equipment that is transferred from the white school to the negro school? A. No. We buy our equipment in large quantities, all of our equipment and supplies, and keep it in a central storeroom. When it is needed, it is trans ferred to the school in which it is to be used. For example, floor sweeps, tissue, paper towels, chemi cal supplies, text books and all of those things go into a central storeroom. They are checked in and checked out to the school that needs them. Q. Thank you. And you don’t keep any record of the expenses including chemicals and necessaries to each school, do you? A. Not an absolute breakdown because those chemicals are consummable and they are used as they are needed. Q. Now I believe you made a sworn statement to the Superintendent of the Department of Education of the State of Texas listing the cost of operation of negro school separate from white, didn’t you? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now then, the chemicals and other things, floor sweeps and such items as those, you did not include them in your budget. Was that a part of the opera tional expense of the negro school? A. It was. We estimate the number that are used in each school. We cannot keep a breakdown on every mop or broom transferred from one school to another. Q. Well, how do you apportion their expenses if you keep no record up? 162 A. By matter of judgment. We cannot—we do not have a secretarial force large enough to keep a breakdown on the transfer of paper and chemicals. On large supplies like furniture, on those things, we keep a breakdown. Q. Now, have you a teacher in the negro school teaching chemistry? A. Yes, sir. Q. What is the name? A. Connie Brown. Q. What certificate or certificates or degrees does he hold? A. He has a Bachelor’s Degree. Q. From what school? A. Prairie View. Q. I believe you were requested to bring a copy of the transcript of your teachers in the subpoena? A. No, sir. Q. Now, is physics offered in the negro school? A. It is. Q. Do you teach it? A. No. Q. Is physics offered in the white school? A. It is. Q. Do you have a teacher for physics? A. Yes, sir. Q. You have a laboratory to teach physics? A. It is taught in the same laboratory that chem istry, biology and general science are taught in. Q. Now I believe you offer mechanical drawing, unit 1, in the white school? A. We do. Q. It is not offered in the negro school? A. It is offered but not taught because there is no demand for it. 163 Q. Have you a teacher? A. No, sir. Q. I believe shop work with two units is offered in the white school? A. It is. Q. I believe it is not offered in the negro school? A. No, it is not being taught in the white school either. It is offered in both schools, but there is no demand for it. Q. You have a teacher in the white school? A. No. Q. You don’t have a teacher eligible to teach shop work with two units? A. Yes, I do. Q. And you don’t have one in the negro school? A. I believe Professor Jackson is eligible to teach it. Q. You believe Professor Jackson. That is the man that testified this morning? A. I believe he is. Q. Have you a teacher employed to teach shop work, two units? A. No. Q. I believe you have bookkeeping and it is a part of the curricula in the white school? A. Yes. Q. And you have a teacher to teach that subject? A. I do. Q. That subject is offered in the white school? A. Yes. Q- And it is not offered in the negro school? A. I believe it is being taught over there this year. No, it is not being taught in there this year. Q- It is not being taught there. Commercial arith metic is offered in the white school? 164 A. It may be offered. It is not being taught. It has not been taught for three years. Q. It is not being offered in the colored school, is it? A. Yes. Q. Have you a teacher to teach it? A. Yes. I have one who is qualified to teach it. Q. What is the name? A. I believe Mrs. Duvall. Q. What subjects was she employed to teach? A. She was employed to teach choral and type writing. Q. Do you know what her academic training is in bookkeeping? A. No, I don’t. Q. You do not know whether she is efficient or not, do you, Mr. Lemmons? A. I would if I had my transcript of credits here, but I have 55 teachers and I cannot remember the qualifications of each one of them. Q. But as of now you do not know whether she is academically qualified, do you? A. No. Q. I believe they are offered secretarial training in the white school? A. They are. Q. It is not being offered in the colored school? A. They are teaching typewriting and shorthand over there. Q. All right. Thank you. Now we get back to my question. In the white high school there is secretarial training offered? A. There is. Q. You have a teacher who in your opinion is academically qualified to teach? 165 A Yes. Q. That course is not offered in the negro school? A. No. They requested typewriting and shorthand. Q. Now, who do you mean by “ they?” A. The students in the Randolph High School for negroes. Q. Now how was that request made? A. They make a request to the principal of the school at the end of the year for the courses they want to take. Q. That is the report that the principal gives you? A. Yes. Q. Now, of your own knowledge, you don’t know whether the students made any request or not. Your information came from the principal? A. That is right. Q. That is right, thank you. Music with four units including a band. Music is offered in the white school? A. Yes. Q. And you have a teacher employed, that in your opinion, from his transcript, is qualified to teach, is that right? A. That is right. Q. That same course is not offered in the negro school ? A. It is. Q. Do you have a teacher employed to teach band music? A. He is. Q- And music for four units? A. He is qualified to teach four units of music. Q- What is that teacher’s name? A. Magruder. Q- Was he employed to teach band music? A. Band music and history. 166 Q. And history. Now, I believe safety education is taught in the white school? A. It is. Q. And you have a teacher employed to teach that safety who from your opinion, in his transcript, is qualified to teach it? A. Yes. Q. You don’t offer that course in the negro school? A. Yes, we offer safety in the negro school. Q. Have you a teacher employed to teach that subject? A. Yes. Q. What is his name? A. He is the coach. That course is taught in con nection with physical education and his name is Les ter Eaton. Q. All right. What is his academic training for safety education? A. He has a Master’s Degree from Prairie View College and he has three years teaching experience here in Wheatley School in Houston, and I don’t know exactly how many semester hours of work he has of physical education or safety education, but he is one of the best qualified teachers I have over there or in the whole system. Q. Well, let me ask you this, Mr. Lemmons. A man may be qualified professionally to do certain work but unless he is academically qualified to do a par ticular job the fact that he is professionally qualified to do many things would not qualify him academi cally to do a particular thing, would it? A. I don’t understand your question. Q. Well, I will try to make it clear. If a man has a Doctor’s Degree in physics, science, he would be professionally prepared to teach science, wouldn’t 167 he? But if he was shifted to teach short hand, he would not be academically efficient to teach shorthand if he had none? A, No. If he had not been trained in shorthand, he would not. Q. Now the fact that the man you have just spoken about has taught in some other field, in your opinion that would not qualify him to teach such a subject as, say, safety education unless he was aca demically prepared to do that? A. I do not know whether he is academically pre pared to teach safety education or not until I check his transcript. Q. You cannot tell the Court at this time whether or not you have a teacher in the negro school who has the academic preparation to teach safety educa tion, can you, Mr. Lemmons? A. I believe Mr. Jackson has it. Q. You believe? A. I mean, Mr. Eaton. I believe Mr. Eaton has it, but I would have to check the records. Q. You would have to check the records. But you do know you have a teacher in the white school who has the academic qualifications? A. He has. Q. I will show you what has been introduced as Plain tiffs Exhibit No. 6, Mr. Lemmons. I will ask you if the instruments and furniture in that room reflect a portion of the wind instruments used in connection with teaching students in the white high school, teaching music, band music in LaGrange High School? A. It does. Q. Now do you have any room comparable, fixtures or equipment, in any room in the school to which Negro stu dents are permitted to attend? 168 A. They have a classroom which is similar to this one. Q. I will ask my question again. I will ask you to ex amine that picture and the objects reflected in there and tell the Court whether or not you have any room in the Negro school comparable to that room, including buildings, instruments, equipment and furniture? A. No, not including instruments. We have a room comparable to everything except the instruments, Q. Now I will show you, Mr. Lemmons, what has been introduced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 5. It has been testi fied that—I will ask you to examine that exhibit including the furniture, fixtures and equipment and I will ask you if that reflects substantially the equipment, furniture and fixtures in that room where bookkeeping is taught in the white high school? A. It does. Q. Now do you have any room equipped in the Negro school within the city limits of LaGrange, Texas, that is comparable to that room for teaching purposes including fixtures, furniture and equipment? Mr. McGregor: I am going to object to that question as being confined to the city limits of LaGrange, Texas. This is a suit against the LaGrange Independent School District. Mr. Durham: Well, I will change this question, if the Court please. Q. Is there any room including fixtures, furniture and equipment, that is comparable to that room in the col ored school known and styled as the Randolph Negro School in LaGrange, Texas? 169 Mr. McGregor: Object to that question as not being responsive to any issue in this case. The issue is whether there is subtan- tial equality between the facilities that are supplied for the Negro students in the LaGrange Independent School District and the white students in the same district. The Court: Objection overruled. Mr. McGregor: Note our exception. A. Would you restate your question? Mr. McGregor: I see one of my witnesses in the court room. Mr. Page, did you just come in? Would Your Honor inform him that the witnesses are under the rule? The Court: Have him come around and let him be sworn. (The witness was sworn.) The Court: The witnesses have been placed outside the court room under the rule but will remain within the call of the bai liff. Q. I will ask you again. I believe you have testified that that room, that picture which is shown in Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 5, represents the room, the equipment and the furniture used in connection with teaching bookkeeping in the white high school in LaGrange, Texas, to which only white students are permitted to attend? 170 A. That is right. Q. I will ask you if you have any room prepared in the Negro school known as the Randolph Colored School in LaGrange, Texas, with equipment including fixtures, fur niture and equipment comparable to that room? Mr. McGregor: Let the record show I am repeating that objection. A. We do not have a room equipped with the type of desks over there. Q. Now I will ask you that room that is used for short hand and typewriting in the Negro school, if it is not used for the library? A. It is. Q. Now, Mr. Lemmons, you testified at the beginning of your testimony that there were how many schools in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. I believe there are five. Five separate plants. Q. All right. How many high schools have you in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Two. Q. Where are they located with reference to the city limits of the City of LaGrange? Are they inside or out side of the city limits? A. They are inside the city limits of LaGrange. Q. All right. Now there are three schools in the La Grange Independent District located within the city limits of the City of LaGrange? A. Yes. Q. Now there are two located outside of the city limits then? A. There are. Q. What are the names of those schools? A. One of them is Ellinger School. The other is the Warda School. 171 Q. Those are elementary schools? A. They are. Q, Are they used for colored or white people? A. White people. Q. Now I will hand you a copy of your report which you filed with the State Superintendent for the school year 1947-1948. Was that report for the entire Independ ent School District of LaGrange? A. It was. Q. Now I believe in that report you showed the daily average attendance of white students. Page 7, Mr. Lem mons. A. Yes, I did. Q. Now at that time I believe you had three schools for white in 1947-1948, one in LaGrange and two outside of the city limits? A. That was in 1947-1948. Q. 1947-1948, two years ago? A. Two years ago. Let me think now. No, there were three white schools that I can recall now outside of the city limits of LaGrange. Q. It was three then? A. It may have been more. I remember we closed one at the beginning of this school year and I don’t recall— Q. Well, just your best recollection. You had at least three, in your opinion? A. Yes. Q. In the 1947-1948 school term? A. Yes. Q. And you have reported a daily average attendance of 600. What was the daily average attendance, I will ask you, for the white school? A. 696.5. Q. And .5. And you had three school plants for the white students on that date? 172 A. There were three or more. Q. Now how many schools in the LaGrange Independ ent School District did you have for Negroes on that date? A. Let me see. We had one at LaGrange—we had three or four. Q. Three or four. Now, what was the daily average attendance of Negro students? A. 343.7. Q. Now in the beginning of that school year of 1948- 1949, I believe you have testified that you had five schools in all in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Yes, sir. Q. Three in the city? A. Yes. Q. Now of those five, how many of the school plants were Negro students permitted to use? A. The one, the Randolph School. Q. And how many of those five school plants were white students permitted to use? A. Four. Q. Now taking your report for the school year 1948 when we had five plants in the system, four for white and one for Negroes, what was the daily average attendance for white? A. Let’s see. This is not my copy. For white? Q. Yes, sir. A. You have here 762. Mr. Durham: Well, Your Honor, I don’t want him to testify— A. I would rather testify from my own, if you don’t mind. Mr. Durham: If the Court please, would you let him get his own? 173 The Court: Yes, all right. A. Average daily attendance for white, 762. Q. And at that time you had four plants for the attend ance of 762 students on a daily average. Now for that same period of time will you tell the Court what the aver age daily attendance of Negro students was? A. What page is that? Q. Page 9. A. 379. Q. Now in the school year 1948-1949 you had plant facilities, four plant facilities to accommodate a daily average of 762 white students. A. Yes. Q. And for Negro students you had one plant to accom modate 379 students on a daily average? A. In 1948-1949. Q. 1948-1949. A. No, at that time we were operating, I told you a while ago, we were operating one colored school in La- Grange, one at Plum and one at Holman. There were three of them in 1948-1949 in operation. Q. How many are you operating now? A. Only one. Q. When did you cease operating the other schools? A. They closed—at the close of the last school term, 1948-1949 school term. Q. How many schools did you have for Negroes in 1948-1949? A. Three. Q. Now where were the other two located other than the Randolph School? A- One at Plum and one at Holman. 174 Q. Now how many rooms were in the school at for Negroes? A. Three. Q. How many teachers? A. Two. Q. How many rooms were at the other school? A. Two. Q. How many rooms? A. Two rooms. Q. And two teachers? A. No, one teacher. The Court: When you closed those schools what did you do with the scholars? Did you send them by bus? A. Yes, sir. We took them on busses and brought them into the Randolph School. Q. Now the schools you were operating for whites out side of the city limits of LaGrange during the same period of time I have indicated to you, how many rooms were in each of those schools? Mr. McGregor: I have not objected to this but it seems to me the schools are closed and it is going rather far afield to go back that far. The Court: I will hear it. A. Would you restate that question? Q. The schools that were operated for whites, I mean the school plants outside of the city limits of LaGrange during the same period of time I have indicated to you, 175 that I have interrogated you about, the school years 1947- 1948 and 1948-1949, how many rooms did you have in the schools for whites? A. At the Ellinger white school I had four classrooms. At the Plum white school I had three classrooms. Q. What about Warda? A. One classroom at Warda. The Court: Court will recess until 2:00 o’clock. (Recessed at 12:00 o’clock noon.) Afternoon Session. 2:00 p. m. The Court: Be seated, gentlemen. You may proceed. C. A. LEMMONS resumed the stand and testified as follows: Direct Examination— (Continued). By Mr. Durham: Q- Mr. Lemmons, you are the same witness that was testifying when the Court recessed for lunch this morn ing? A. I am. Q- Now when were the repairs completed on the Ran dolph Colored School? 176 A. They were completed the same time that the con struction work was completed on the white school. Q. That is about September 1? A. Yes, sir. Q. Of 1949? A. Yes. Q. Now I am going to show you what has been intro duced as Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 12. I will ask you to ex amine that instrument, please, that exhibit. I will ask you if that room, the objects shown in there, represent the equipment that is contained in the rooms used for a li brary in the Public High School used for white students in LaGrange? A. It does. Mr. Durham: That is Exhibit No. 12. Q. 1 will ask you now if you have a room equipped comparable for a library room in the Negro school? A. We have a similar room. It is not exactly like that. Q. Are the furnishings and the equipment and the volumes comparable to these? A. The shelving is comparable. The number of vol umes is—there are more volumes in the white library than there are in the colored school library. Q. Now you have a lending desk, I believe, shelf, in your library at the white school? A. I do. Q. I will show you what has been introduced as Plain- itff’s Exhibit No. 15. I will ask you if that does not rep resent the room designated as a library in the Randolph School for colored pupils? A. It does. 177 Q. Now I will ask you this question. In your opinion as an educator is the library furnished and equipped in the high school in LaGrange Independent School District com parable in volume and equipment to the library room designated for Negroes? A. There are not as many volumes in the library for Negroes as there are in the library for the white school. Q. What about the other, the furnishings? A. There is a teacher’s desk in the library for Negroes which is used as a charge-out desk. There is counter in the library for the white high school students which is used as a charge-out desk. Q. Thank you. Now is it your testimony that the fur niture, fixtures and equipment in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 12 are comparable, in your opinion, to the fixtures, furniture and equipment shown in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 15? Mr. McGregor: I want to make the same objection. The issue in this case is whether or not they are substantially equal, not whether they are comparable. The Court: Objection overruled. I will hear it. Mr. McGregor: Note our exception. The Court: Of course, I am not passing on any question of law. A. Will you restate the question, please? Q- I will ask you, in educational value, you as an edu cator and superintendent of the public schools of the La- Grange Independent School District, for educational value 178 is the room equipped for the library in the Negro school equal substantially to the room equipped for the white school? A. If the room in the Negro school had the same num ber of volumes in the library, it would be comparable. Q. Thank you. Now in the absence of those volumes is it comparable? A. No. Q. Thank you. I show you here what has been intro duced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 18. Will you please ex amine it? A. I recognize it, yes. Q. What do you recognize that to be, Mr. Lemmons? A. This is a photograph of the chemistry and science laboratory in the white high school at LaGrange, Texas. Q. Will you tell the Court what equipment is in there? A. There are four students laboratory desks for the conduction of experiments. There is a storage cabinet alongside one wall. There is a small storage cabinet alongside of another wall and the door leading into the science or chemical supply room is open and you can see into the supply room. Q. Do you see anything else in there you recognize? A. Well, I recognize everything in there. Q. I will ask you are there any faucets and running water in that room? A. There is. Q. Do you see anything else that you recognize in the laboratory for the white students? A. Well, there is a Bunsen burner on the table. There is a brick on the table. There is a crucible on one table. There is a balance, a set of weights, a test tube holder with three or four test tubes in it and there are numerous other items of laboratory equipment that are stored back on the shelves and I cannot identify them. 179 Q. Thank you very much. I will ask you to examine what has been introduced as Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 19. Do you recognize that room? A. I do. Q. What is that room designated as? A. That is the science room at Randolph Colored High School. Q. I will ask you as superintendent of the Independent School District of LaGrange, Texas, and as an educator, in your opinion, as those rooms are now equipped, are they equal or substantially equal for educational purposes and especially the teaching of physics and chemistry? A. Well, this photograph, Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 19, does not show all of the equipment that is in the Randolph School, while that one shows much more of the equipment in the white high school laboratory. Q. All right. Now what is deleted in that exhibit, what is not shown in Exhibit No. 19 that is actually in that room? A. These cupboards alongside the wall are—contain quite a bit of experimental equipment and there is quite a bit of equipment contained in the storeroom to which the door is open there. Q. Well, that in the storeroom is shown and the door is open? A. Only part of it. There are shelves along three walls there which are not shown. Q Thank you. Now is there any running water in that room? A. No, there is not. Q. Any faucets in that room? A. No. Q- Nowt in your opinion, taking into consideration what you said is not shown, in your opinion is this room as equipped— 180 A, No, it is not. Q. No, I did not get my question finished. With all of the other items that you said were in this room that are not shown in this picture, in your opinion is that room as it is equipped now of the same educational value in teaching chemistry and physics as to equip ment, furniture and facilities in this room? Mr. McGregor: I object to that on the same ground as stated before as the issue in the case is whether or not it is sub stantially equal. The Court: Same ruling. Mr. McGregor: Exception. A. It would be substantially equal if laboratory tables of the type that are shown in the photograph of the white laboratory were in the laboratory at Ran dolph Colored School. Q. Now, since they are not in there, as they stand today, are they of equal educational value? Mr. McGregor: Same objection. Go ahead. A. They are with that exception. Q. Well, thank you for that, but answer this ques tion if you will. Now, as they stand, with those things not being there, are they of substantially equal edu cational value? 181 A. Well, the answer is still the same. If they were there, they would be equal. Q. Well, thank you very much. But they are not there. But with them not being there are they of sub stantially equal educational value? A. That is the only difference. Therefore, the an swer is no. Q. Thank you. Thank you. Now, Mr. Lemmons, I believe you testified that a class was being taught in the room designated for the negro library. Is that right? A. I did. Q. There is no class being taught in the library set aside for the library in the white school? A. No. Q. Does that detract from the value of a library where a class is being taught and students are trying to study? A. Will you state that question again, please? Q. Does that detract from the value of that por tion of the building set aside for library purposes to have a class going on in the room which is a library? A. It would. Q. Mr. Lemmons, I will have to show you three ex hibits together for the reason that they represent, I think, one room. I show you Exhibit Nos. 25, 26 and 27. Would you please examine them. Do you recognize those exhibits and what building that room is in? A. I do. Q. What room is that, Mr. Lemmons? A. That is, two of them, 25 and 27 are—I beg your pardon, 27 and 26, are photographs of the cafeteria in the white school, and photograph No. 25 is a photo graph of the kitchen in the white school. Q- Now what do you see in that kitchen? 182 A. I see two gas stoves, two sinks with drainboards, coffee pot, dish pans, pans and other cooking utensils. Q. Now that is Exhibit No. 25? A. Yes. Q. Now I will ask you to examine Exhibit 26. Is that still a part of the cafeteria? A. It is. Q. What do we have there? What do you find there, Mr. Lemmons? A. A steam table. Q. Now in Exhibit No. 27 what do you find, please, sir? A. It is a view of the serving area in the cafeteria at the Hermes White School. Q. Now do you have a steam table in any room over at the negro school? A. I do not. Q. For what purpose did you install this steam table in the white school? A. To keep the food warm as it is served. Q. And do you think that is of benefit to the chil dren? A. It is. Q. Now, the food is prepared at the white school, is it not? A. It is. Q. And it is sent to the negro school? A. Yes. Q. What is the distance from where the food is prepared in the white school to the negro school? A. I would judge about half a mile or possibly three-quarters of a mile. Q. How is the food carried from the white school to the negro school? A. In a pick-up truck. 183 Q. Is the food heated between the time it leaves the white school half a mile away before it is fed to the negro children? A. It is. Q. How is it heated? A. On a gas stove. Q. On a gas stove? The Court: Gas stove where? A. In the cafeteria, of the negro school. Q. Now have you ever been present when they were heating it? A. I have not. Q. And all you know about it is what somebody told you. You don’t actually know whether it was heated or not? A. No. I instructed the cooks to heat it before it was served. Q. But as to whether or not that was done you don’t know? A. No. Q. I hand you what has been introduced as Plain tiff’s Exhibit No. 28. Do you recognize that? A. Yes, I do. Q. What is that? A. That is the kitchen at Randolph School. Q. Now what type of heating system, Mr. Lem mons, do you have in the elementary school recently completed for whites? A. We have a gas fired boiler system. Q. What is known as a central heating system? A. Yes, it is. 184 Q. It has ducts through which the heat comes into the room? A. It does, in the classrooms. Q. In the classrooms? A. Yes. Q. Now in each of the classrooms of the elementary school which was completed for whites about Septem ber 1, 1949, in passing from one classroom to the other there is a door leading out of those classrooms into the next classroom. That is true, isn’t it? A. Yes. Q. In the negro school which was repaired for the attendance of negro pupils, in order to reach one class room from the next classroom the negro students must pass out into the open corridor which is shown on Plaintiff’ s Exhibit No. 11, that is true, isn’t it? A. Yes. Q. And what is the teacher load with reference to number in the negro school? A. May I refer to my notes? Q. Yes, I will be glad if you will, Mr. Lemmons. A. In the negro school we have 18 teachers and we have an enrollment of 439, and an average daily attendance of 363. Q. Now how much load is that per student per teacher? A. I don’t believe I have divided it out. I can— Q. Well, is it about equally divided among the teachers? A. Yes. Q. Now is there any type of heating for this open corridor? A. There is not. Q. Now I believe these represent the doors on Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 19. These are about the loca 185 tions of the doors, are they not? The doors, is that about right? A. That is right. Q. Now what would you say was the distance from one door, say, beginning with the first door in this open corridor, to the next classroom? A. About 32 or 34 feet. Q. About 32 or 34 feet. Now both ends of this open corridor are open? A. Yes. Q. The children have no protection from cold wea ther in this corridor when they leave the classroom and go from one classroom to another? A. They have protection from the rain but not from the cold weather. Q. All right. Now what type of heating system do you have in the negro school? A. We have individual gas heaters which are of the blower type with thermostatic controls on them. Q. When a door remains open in a room where you have the blower type system of heating does the room chill quickly? A. I don’t know what you mean by “ quickly.” Q. Does it chill any quicker than steam heat, even heat? A. I don’t believe it would. Q. You don’t believe it would? A. I don’t know. Q. Now in passing out of one classroom into this open corridor these doors are required to remain open until that class passes out? A. That is true. Q- And it remains open until another class passes m> ^ another class is going into that classroom for that period? 186 A. Yes. Q. And during that period of time the children are marching in the open corridor? A. Yes. Q. Are the white children required to leave the classroom and go out into an open corridor or is the corridor in the white school enclosed? A. It is enclosed. Q. It has both shelter and enclosure? A. Yes. Q. And it has heat in the corridor? A. Yes. Q. The same heat, the same temperature that is in the room? A. Approximately, yes. Q. Approximately, yes. Now, in traveling from the classroom to the gymnasium or the cafeteria, I be lieve in the negro school they are compelled to travel through this open corridor? A. Yes. Q. And the girls going to the restroom, coming from classes now must go through this open corridor? A. Yes. Q. And out into the back of the building, out to the back of the school building? A. Yes. The restroom is at the end of the open corridor. Q. Yes. The boys likewise traveling from the class rooms going to the restrooms must travel through this open corridor and out into the back of the building, is that right? A. Yes. Q. Now where are the restrooms in the white ele mentary school? A. They are located between the classrooms. 187 Q. Located between classrooms. And the heat in the restrooms in the white elementary school is ap proximately the same temperature as it is in the cor ridors and in the classrooms? A. Approximately, yes. Q. Approximately. Now where are the restrooms located in the white high school? A. They are located on the first floor in a fashion which is known as gang toilets or restrooms where all the facilities are together in one place. Q. Yes. Now do those restrooms have shelter over them and are they enclosed? A. They are. Q. And they have practically the same heating facilities that the classrooms and hallways or corri dors have. That is true, isn’t it? A. Yes. Q. And only the negro school pupils are required to travel through an open corridor passing from one classroom to another. That is true, isn’t it? A. Now do you mean— Q. In the City of LaGrange? A. Within the City of LaGrange? Q. Yes, sir. A. Yes. Q. In fact, there is no negro school in the district now except LaGrange School? A. Yes. Q. That is what I understood you to say. Mr. McGregor: May it please the Court, if I might interrupt for a second. I have Mr. Page, the architect from Austin who designed this building that I wanted to make proof of just a few technical matters and to prove up 188 one periodical, and he has been here since yesterday morning. The case is taking a good deal longer than plaintiff apparently anticipated and as I seem to have anticipated, too. I wonder if I could have leave of the Court to with draw Mr. Lemmons for a few minutes and put Mr. Page on out of order and let him return to Austin. He is quite a busy man and I hate to keep him here. The Court: I don’t have any objection. Do you have any? Mr. Durham: We have no objection, Your Honor. Mr. McGregor: Call Mr. Page, please. GEORGE MATTHEWS PAGE, was called as a wit ness on behalf of the defendant and, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. Would you state your name, please? A. George Matthews Page. Q. Where do you reside, Mr. Page? The Court: I did not get the name. 189 A. George Matthews Page. Q. Where do you reside, Mr. Page? A. Austin, Texas. Q. What is your present occupation? A. Architect. Q. How long have you been engaged in that line of endeavor? A. Since I graduated from school, University of Texas, in 1937. Q. Did you go to any schools following the Univer sity of Texas? A. No, I didn’t. I went to Europe and studied, but not in school. Q. Not in the United States. How long did you stay in Europe? A. I was just traveling for about five months, four to five months. Q. I see. Are you licensed to practice architecture in Texas? A. I am. Q. Anywhere else? A. No. Q- I see. A. Other than—pardon me—other than what li censes the Texas license will cover. Now, I can’t an swer that. Q- I see. Now you have a firm? A. Yes. Q. What is it known as, Mr. Page? A. Page, Sutherland and Page. Q- Was your firm employed by the LaGrange In dependent School District to do some architectural work for that district, in the district? A. We were. 190 Q. Can you recall approximately about when you were first consulted in reference to that work? A. I would say approximately, oh, in the vicinity of July of 1948. Q. Sometime around July, 1948? A. That is just guesswork, but I believe that is about right. Q. As part of that work did you design the addition to and the completion of and certain repairs to the Randolph Negro School in that district? A. We did the four classrooms and the gymnasium, cafeteria. The Court: Little louder, please, sir. A. We did the four classrooms and the combina tion gymnasium—cafeteria and auditorium. Q. Was that a job that was partially attached to an old structure? A. It was. Q. Do you know about when the old structure had been constructed? A. I would guess—I had nothing to do with the old structure. Q. Well, if you don’t know— A. Prewar, but I don’t know the date. Q. When you say “ prewar” you mean the recent war? A. I would say somewhere around, guessing, 1935. Q. Well— A. 1935, but I don’t know. Q. Well now, this elevation that I show you here, is that the elevation that you prepared to indicate the completed building? 191 A. That is the elevation we prepared and prior to going into the final working drawing. Q. I see. Now whenever I ask if it is what you prepared, of course, I mean you and your staff. You have other men— A. I prepared that sketch myself. Q. You actually prepared this one yourself. Now this school is of what construction, this portion that was added to the old structure? A. It is hollow tile construction. Q. Is it a sort of brick type? A. It is a masonry construction. Q. What is the floor in front here, this floor here and the floor in the rooms? I am not talking about the woodwork now. A. The floor is a concrete slab and in the class rooms, there are four new classrooms there, there is asphalt tile on the concrete slab. Q. And what is the substance in this structure here? A. That is hollow tile again with a 6 foot concrete wall that runs around the building, that lower sec tion. Q. This lower portion? A. Yes. Q. That is a 6 foot concrete wall? A. I believe it is 6 foot and it continues around the structure there. Q- And what is the material that the domelike portion of this structure is constructed from? A. Those are quonset huts. Q- What is the material? A. I believe they are galvanized iron. I would have to check that. Q- A metal of some sort like that? 192 A. Yes. Q. Now what is the floor inside of the gymnasium constructed of? A. The floor in the gymnasium is a concrete slab and the basket ball area is maple floor on screeds. Q. Maple floor on screeds? A. On top of the concrete. Q. Is the maple used there commonly called hard wood? A. Yes. Q. I show you Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 23 and I will ask you to describe to the Court, please, the nature of its construction, whether it is steel, concrete, what it is here, what these steps are here, what its type heater is and the lighting, and just tell the Court generally about it. The Court: That is the negro building, is it? A. That is the gymnasium-cafeteria combination. As I said, there is a concrete retaining wall that goes around this entire structure and it is what I believe is called quonset A, three section quonset, and these are steel columns and steel beams supporting there. This is your maple floor and on the other side of the columns you have a concrete floor. This area here around the prosoenium of the stage is Y-joint yel low pine which has been painted, and then the ceiling here, we have, I think, I believe, four panels that are, oh, I would say 3 by 8 and it is a sort of lucite ma terial. It is to admit lighting into the structure in the center of the area. It is a product that I believe has recently been taken in by the people that handle quonset huts and developed for that purpose. 193 Q, Now I don’t believe you described the heating unit, A. The heating units are space heaters. I believe there are six of them. I have forgotten the exact make. They are space heaters with fans. Your air is heated and blown over a coil system and blown out and put in circulation by a fan. Q. When it is not being used for heating can it be used for any other purpose? A. You turn your fans on and, of course, you get ventilation. Q. Now I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 24 and ask you if that is the other side of what you have just been describing? A. Yes, sir. Q. And this apparent construction here on that side of the gymnasium, what is that? A. That is V-joint yellow pine, frame wall, stud wall and it has been painted. Behind that area is the kitchen. Q. Did you describe what those beams are to the Court? A. Steel I beams. Q. That type building, in your experience and learning as an architect, what would be the reason able useful life of that type of building constructed out of the material and in the form it is there constructed from? A. I would say with proper maintenance that it would be somewhere between 40 and 50 years, prop erly maintained. Q- I see. A. That is a guess on that. I think it would, though. Q. Now I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 28 and ask you what that is? 194 A. That is the kitchen area. Q. And how are those walls finished up? A. These walls are, as I recall, we used a white rez. Q. I don’t mean the painted covering. A. Oh, they are Y-joint yellow pine. I believe they are knotted. I am not positive of that. Q. What is this substance used to ceil the ceiling? A. That is fibreboard. Q. Why did you use that fibreboard in the ceiling? A. Well, it is a material that is economical and as sembles easily and makes about, I would say, a ceil ing roughly comparable to sheetrock. Q. I see. Now what is this over on the right hand side of the picture? A. It is a counter and sink. Q. I see. A. Kitchen counter and sink. Q. Now I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 22, which has been shown here in evidence to be a gymnasium, and I see here some sort of apparatus in the center corner there. What is that? A. That is a form of space heater. Q. Is that substantially equal to the type heater that is in the gymnasium at the negro school? A. I would say it was, judging from the picture. I don’t recall the make or size or anything, but it is apparently the same type of thing. Q. And does it use the same system to distribute heat? A. It is a fan system, I would say, distributing the hot air. Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 32 and ask you if you recognize that? A. Yes, sir. That is one of the new classrooms in the Randolph School. 195 Q. And this apparently is the back wall of that room, is it, Mr. Page? A. Yes, sir. Q. And what is this mechanical looking object there? A. It is a space heater, space unit. Q. I will ask you if that is a recent development, that type of heater? I mean by recent, 10 or 15 years. A. I would say so. I don’t know the date it became ef fective. Q. I will ask you if it is recent in its utilization in the schools in the various parts of the state? A. I would say 15 or 20 years, if that is recent. Q. Do you find it in your work in designing schools and experience of remodeling schools, a wide use of it amongst the various schools? A. Yes, I think you find quite a number of them use them over the United States. Q. Have you ever been in a school in the City of Houston where they are used? A. Yes, I was in one this morning, in Bellaire, but I could not go into the classroom. They were conducting classes but I did notice apparently the same type of thing, a unit heater. Q. Now those walls here in this building, does that have something on it or is that a masonry wall? A. That is a cross partition and a frame partition. Q. Is the other side of it, if a classroom is on the other side, is that wood all the way through or is there masonry in between? A. No, there is wood on the other side. There is stud m between and wood on the one side and wood on the other side if there is a classroom on the other side. Q- And if it is the end of the corridor it would be a masonry wall? A. I believe it is masonry at the corridor ends. 196 Q. These walls, are they masonry? A. Hollow tile. Q. Any wood in there at all? A. Not at all, except the window frames. Q. And then the walls across the room, are they masory walls? A. Masonry walls. Q. Any wood in them? A. Not any wood. Q. I hand you Plaintiffs Exhibit 31 and ask you if that is the front of that or a similar room in the same school? A. I would presume so. Yes, I would say it must be. Q. Well, if you don’t want to say that it is the same- A. Certainly a similar room. Q. Is that one of the rooms in that school? A. I would say it was. Q. Your statement then in reference to that partition is just the same as to the other end of it depending on whe ther or not there is a classroom there? A. That is right. Q. Now these are wood casements or are they steel? A. No, those are wood, double hung windows. Q. And when you say “double hung” that means you can have ventilation from the top and the bottom? A. Yes, both sections operate. Q. A portion of this work here, according to that pic ture, there is a convector shape to be put there which has not been procured yet? A. It is my understanding they intended to get a light baffle, if that is what you mean. Mr. Durham: Plaintiff asks that portion of the answer be excluded, that it is his understanding they expect to put it there, as having no probative force. 197 The Court: I understand he is testifying that according to the plans it will be there. A. Our plans did not include a baffle but it was under stood they planned to put a baffle in there. Q. Now the floor there in that room is of what sub stance? A. The floor is a concrete slab with asphalt tile. (A photograph was marked as “Defendants’ Exhibit 3.” ) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 3 and ask you to examine it, please. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, we object to any testimony with reference to the exhibit until it is shown what it is, if this witness knows what it is. The Court: He just handed it to him, I guess. We all saw it at noon. I know what it is. Mr. Durham: It is a defendants’ exhibit, Your Honor. I don’t under stand. The Court: Exhibit 3. It is the one that you did not offer and he offered and gave it another exhibit number. Mr. McGregor: No, Your Honor is mistaken, if the Court please. It is one that Mr. Durham had not seen before. 198 The Court: Oh. Well, go ahead and identify it. Q. I will ask you if this object in Defendants’ Exhibit 3 in the center of the picture is an illustration of what you call a baffle? A. Yes, sir. Mr. McGregor: I now introduce that. A. A light baffle. Mr. McGregor: I introduce that now for illustrative purposes only. (“Defendants’ Exhibit 3” was received in evidence.) Q. Now in the diffusion of or the utilization of light in rooms does this type of baffle have any particular ad vantage, taking into consideration the type windows shown in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 3? A. It is our opinion that it does have an advantage. Q. Would you tell the Court what that advantage is? A. The light baffle is a thing developed, I believe, by Dr. D. B. Harmon. The idea of the thing is to throw light to the ceiling and diffuse it and get your brightness ratio. In other words, your light to dark areas as close together as possible. In other words, a uniform lighting, as near as a uniform lighting in a classroom as possible and it also is aimed at throwing the light to the far side, the inside wall of the classroom. Q. May the windows be utilized, the upper portion of the windows utilized when you have a baffle? A. I can see no reason why they cannot. 199 Q. Ventilation then may still be obtained from the upper section? A. I would say so. Q. Now, Mr. Page, this building is constructed here with a passageway through here where the two figures are shown, a small figure and a large figure. A passage way through here and then down all the way there where you go into this gymnasium behind these classrooms and is what I believe the architects call an open corridor. Have I used the correct expression? A. One of several correct ones, yes, sir. Q. One of several. And inside what is part of the old building there is a similar open corridor which goes all the way back of this ell and over on this side there is another corridor that goes all the way back to the end of that ell. Is that correct? A. Yes. Q. You took those into consideration, those various corridors, when you were designing this addition? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now I will ask you, Mr. Page, if the open corridor type of school construction is an accepted form of archi tectural design and construction of schools in the south west? A. They have built schools in the southwest with open corridors. Q- Is it the practice presently and are there many of them in this area under construction with the open type corridor? A. I would say that there are probably a fair number with an open type corridor although I just know of a few. I understand Seguin is using an open corridor on their new schools. I haven’t seen the plans but that is what it would have to be, and a school here in Houston, this one I men tioned, has an open corridor. And I understand that they 200 have several other schools. An architect told me that he thought there were two or three more. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, we want to object to all this hearsay testi mony. Mr. McGregor: I have asked the question on the basis of, isn’t it well known in architecture that in Texas open type schools are being constructed. The Court: I rather think he is talking about a matter that is important in the case. Objection overruled. Q. Go ahead, Mr. Page. A. The open corridor really started with California and there are many schools of thought as to whether it is the best or not the best. There are many architects who feel that it is the answer, and there are others who feel that it is not. But there are schools in Texas with open corri dors designed deliberately that way. The Court: What are the advantages or disadvantages of the open corridors? A. Well, sir, one of the advantages is the results from what I understand is the present curricula, and that is contrary to what it used to be, perhaps in my time. Child ren don’t change classes. For example, I went from geo graphy in one room to arithmetic in a different room. Now they do not move in an elementary school like they used to so therefore many architects contend that since the child 201 is going to be in the classroom most of the day that there is not a great disadvantage in having them go outside, say, to go to lunch or even to go home you must get out side. Now, another big advantage of it is that it opens the door for what is called bilateral lighting in many cases. That is the case of windows perhaps from this side of the room and high windows above that cornice over there which lights that room, and there are many experts who think bilateral lighting is not good, and the disadvantage of an open corridor system is in that the child must go out in the weather and some people feel that it is not worth that. Now add to that, too, the economics and this, once again, could vary with various bids. We feel that with an open corridor system you will end up costing more money than classrooms on each side of the closed corridor because in both cases you have to have your walls on each side of your classrooms, but where you have an inside corridor the corridor wall does not have to be as weatherproof. In other words, it can be of a fairly light construction, such as that wall right there, whereas this wall here is much heavier. Well, you use the same amount of walls but one can be lighter. Then, too, you are bound to add a great deal of corridor space. Now there is a considerable argument about that, but it is our feeling that it is—the problem is that it would cost a little more money to build a single open corridor parti cularly if you do it in the construction. Q. Are you all through? A. Yes. Q. Now this corridor here that I pointed out a moment ago where the small figure and the large figure seem to be 202 coming out, that corridor meets the open corridor going towards the gymnasium, does it not? A. Yes, sir. Q. And affords access to the gymnasium there as well as on this side of the elevation? A. Yes, there is a door to the gym on the other side. Q. Now in the gymnasium, at the back—well, I be lieve that has been testified to. I won’t go into that. Now, Mr. Page, are you acquainted with the Architectural Forum magazine of building? A. Yes, sir. Q. I will ask you to tell the Court, please, the position of this periodical in the architectural world as to re liability, disclosure of advancement in architecture and the development and construction of buildings as reflected by the periodical? A. I think the Architectural Forum is almost com pletely conceded to be one of the three leading publica tions on architecture in the United States, the other two being Progressive Architecture and Architectural Record. Mr. McGregor: Would counsel like to examine the editorial—I mean, the statement page. Would you like to see the statement page, Your Honor? Mr. Durham: Your Honor, we would like to have it marked so we can make our objections intelligently. The Court: Mark it as an exhibit and offer it, and I will hear the objection. 203 (The periodical Architectural Forum was marked as “Defendants’ Exhibit 4.” ) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 4— Mr. Durham: We object to the introduction of Defendants’ Exhibit No. 4 for the reason that on its face it is shown to be a printed periodical. The authenticity of the thing has not been shown. The witness has not been shown to have had anything to do with the composition of it. It has not been under his control or authority and is not by any act or effort on his part. The same is purely hearsay and it is a written periodical. The Court: Of course, he has not offered it yet, as I understand. If he wants to question the witness about it with a view to offering it later—is that what you intend to do? Mr. McGregor: That is correct. The Court: I will let him question the witness about it. Q. I ask you to turn to page 103 of Defendants’ Exhibit 4 and ask you to examine that page and tell the Court what is reflected in the drawings on that page. The Court: I don’t think you can offer it that way, Counsel. You will have to get him to identify it and then offer it in evi dence. 204 Q. I hand you herewith Defendants’ Exhibit 4 and ask you what the cover of that reflects it to be? A. It is an issue devoted primarily to schools. Q. What is the issue involved? What is the name of the periodical? A. Architectural Forum. Q. Is that the periodical you referred to a while ago as an established periodical in the architectural field? A. Yes, sir. Q. Will you advise us where it is published? A. It is published by Time, Incorporated, and has offices in New York, and I presume other spots. I will have to read it and see. It is published by Time, Incorporated. Q. All right. Turn back to page 103. Now I will ask you to tell the Court what appears on page 103 in the— Mr. Durham: Your Honor, we object to the witness testifying as to the contends of the instrument that is not in evidence. The Court: Objection sustained. That is what I ruled a while ago, Counsel. If you want to offer it, you may do so, and I will rule on it. Mr. McGregor: All right, sir. I offer the periodical at this time. Mr. Durham: We make the same objection. The Court: Knowing that it had not been offered I did not charge my mind with your objection. Would you mind restating it. 205 Mr. Durham: The plaintiff objected to the introduction of Defendants’ Exhibit No. 4, first, on the ground that it is purported to be a periodical in printed form. It is not certified to by the purported authorities or authors or publishers; that the witness is not shown to have had anything to do with the composition of it and the authenticity of the printed article is not known. That it is purely hearsay. The Court: What have you to say about that objection, Counsel? Mr. McGregor: Well, Your Honor, I have no proof of authenticity. The Court: Let me see the particular thing you are offering. That is on page 103? Mr. McGregor: That is right, those designs there. The Court: I think this statement here could be purely hearsay and ex parte. I think the objection is good. Mr. McGregor: Very well, Your Honor, we will withdraw our offer. Q- Now, Mr. Page, did you, at the same time that you constructed the Randolph School at LaGrange, design and construct a grammar school on another piece of ground? A. We did. Q- What type construction was that, Mr. Page? A. Construction of the Hermes School is a concrete slab, the exterior walls are brick, what we call a cavity 206 construction. In other words, with an air space between. The roof is wood frame. The interior partitions, in other words, the corridor partitions, are wood frame partitions. The lateral partitions are also wood frame. In other words, the partitions across the back or front of the classrooms are wood stud with Y-joint pine and sheetrock. Q. This roof on the Randolph School, is it a built up roof, too, just like the Hermes School? A. They are both wood frame roofs, built up roofs. Q. Now I hand you Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 29 and ask you what that represents? A. It is a classroom at Hermes School. Q. And this wall to the right of the picture there, what is the bottom portion under the windows? A. It is a brick cavity wall. Q. Is there wood in the cavity on that wall? A. No. Q. There is not. And what is this structure here at the top? A. Those are directional glass blocks. Q. And light can come through those blocks? A. That is what they are there for. Q. The window area, so far as ventilation is concerned in the summertime in the Hermes School, is greater or less than— A. It is less than at this school, the window ventilation. Q. In other words, it is greater in the Randolph School? A. The window ventilation is greater in the Randolph. Q. Where those glass bricks are used in that particular type of construction diffusers of light are not needed, are they? A. They are not. Q. But there is no way to use that space for ventilation once the glass brick is installed? A. There is not. 207 Q. Have you been in one of these rooms since the Her mes School was finished and the desks put in? A. I have. Q. Do you know where they hang their coats in those rooms? A. Yes. They hang them in that recess behind the board in that room, and in some cases it will be in front of the room, behind the blackboard. Q. In both of these schools then the pupils hang their coats in the individual rooms, that is, so far as Hermes School is concerned and in the Randolph School? A. They both hang their clothes in the classrooms. Q. In the construction of schools, what is the trend in reference to the construction of schools and utilizing lockers for the hanging of coats and clothes while the children are at school? A. Lockers prevail still in high school construction, but very, very few elementary schools, that I know of, of new design, are using steel lockers. Q- I see. Now I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 8 and I will ask you if you recognize that? A. That is the corridor of Hermes School. Q. Now can you identify which one of those walls is the interior wall of the classrooms? A. Both are. Q- Both are. In other words, there is a classroom on each side of those corridor walls? A. That is right. Q- What are those walls constructed of? A. These are wood stud walls here with solid sheeting on corridor side, solid sheeting and transite. On the interior there is V-joint pine. Q. This picture, Plaintiff’s Exhibit 27, is that in the Hermes School? A. This is the cafeteria. 208 Q. And that is part of the new Hermes School building, isn’t it? A. That is right. Q. What kind of heating unit do you see in that pic ture? A. Space heaters. Q. Is that the same kind of heater that is in the Ran dolph School? A. The same idea, fan and heating coils. Q. In other words, you don’t know whether it is the same brand or not? A. Well now, I think on this, we used a boiler and used hot water instead of gas fired heating. Q. But it is the same type of space heater? A. That is right. Q. Now you have two types of heating units then in the Hermes School? A. Yes. You mean the classrooms, are they heated this way? Q. Yes. A. No. The classrooms in Hermes are not heated that way. Q. They have a different type of heating system? A. They have a forced air heating system. The Court: We will take a recess of ten minutes. (Short recess.) The Court: Be seated. You may proceed. Mr. McGregor: You may take the witness. Cross Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. Mr. Page, the open corridors are now in the ex perimental stage, aren’t they? A. I would say that is correct. Q. They were first started in schools in a section of the United States where the climate was even almost all the year round. That is true, isn’t it? A. They were first started in California. Q. Yes. Now, in a section where you have extreme cold weather as in Texas, ice and snow, those open corridors could present a dangerous situation from snow and ice blowing in, couldn’t they? A. I don’t agree with you on that for this reason: I think it can conceivably present a hygiene problem, but I don’t believe it presents a dangerous problem. Q. Thank you. If wind is blowing, snow would blow in those corridors, that is true? A. That is true if it is snowing. Q. If that snow remained there overnight and it was frozen and the children were compelled to pass over it, in your opinion would it, as an expert, present a dangerous situation? A. It could, yes. The Court: Which side of the building in this Randolph School is the corridor on? A. I will have to get somebody to straighten me. You m'ght ask Mr. Lemmons. I have forgotten my directions there. The Court: ^ efl, you can ask somebody else. 210 The Witness: (Addressing Mr. Lemmons) Charlie, what side does the new corridor face? Mr. Lemmons: Faces east and west. A. The corridor is on the east side of the classroom. Mr. Lemmons: It is on the northwest side of the new classroom. A. On the northwest side. Q. Now, the opening in the corridors is in what direc tion. North, south, east or west? A. He stated, I believe, that the corridor is on the northwest side of the building. Q. And the openings will be to the north and south? A. They will be to the north and south, yes, sir. Mr. Durham: Would you let me see that exhibit, it was No. 4, I believe, that I had not seen. Mr. McGregor: No. 3. Mr. Durham: I thought you said 4. Mr. Ramey: It was Defendants’ Exhibit 3. Mr. Durham: Defendants’ 3. Thank you. 211 Q. I hand you here that which has been introduced as Defendants’ Exhibit No. 3. Now I believe you stated that the objects you see above these windows is a light baffle? A. That is right. Q. That is for diffusing light? A. Yes. Q. Now this object you see there must be lowered or raised in an effort to adjust diffused light, is that correct? A. That is right. Q. Now was that type of baffle put in the negro school, the Randolph School over at LaGrange? A. You mean in the old part or the new part? Q. In the new part? A. As I told you, it was—I understood that they in tended to put them in. We normally, you see, don’t put those in because they can be built on the job so much bet ter than you can buy these metal frames. Q. And as an economical proposition you used those? A. I don’t believe I understand that. Q. I thought you said you could buy them cheaper? A. I said you could make them cheaper than you could buy the aluminum frames. Q. Thank you. Now, Mr. Page, I believe you acted as the architect for both the Randolph and the Hermes Schools? A. That is right. Q. And you drew the plans and specifications, did you, Mr. Page, as an architect? A. For the four classrooms and the gymnasium, yes. Q' y°u advised with the school officials in the aGrange Independent School District with reference to e construction of those buildings? A- I did. Q- With reference to the type of material? A. I did. 212 Q. Now you continued in that capacity until the work had been completed? A. Right. Q. And I believe that work was completed about Sep tember 1, 1949? A. I believe so. Q. And you still have the blueprints and specifications for each of the buildings? A. That is right. Q. I believe that is the property of the architect? A. That is right. Q. Now, I believe you stated, in response to a ques tion from Mr. McGregor, that it was not customary now to put locker rooms in an elementary school? A. I didn’t say that. Q. Oh. Well, I understood you. A. I said that it is not common practice to use metal, steel metal lockers in an elementary school. Q. Now did they use steel metal lockers in the Hermes School? A. We did not. Q. What did you use? A. We used an area, a recess occurring between the teacher’s closet and the toilets and we put the blackboard, if that came at the front of the room, the blackboard was placed in front of it, and if it was in the back, it was cardboard. Q. Was that in each classroom? A. In each classroom. Q. Now did you put any lockers in the gym at the new school? A. I don’t believe we put lockers in there. Q. From your experience as an architect in the de signing and construction of school buildings, do you be lieve that is an asset to a school to have a locker placed 213 in a classroom as you have indicated they were placed in the elementary school? Mr. McGregor: I think there is a faulty premise in that question. He has stated there were no lockers in the classroom. The Court: Read the question. (Question read.) A. Which elementary school? Q. I don’t want to misguide you. I understood you to say that in the white high school you placed the lockers behind the blackboard? A. We placed the cloakroom areas. Q. That is what I mean. A. That is different. Lockers, I am thinking of steel lockers. Q. Thank you. The Court: That is a place where they hang them on the side of the wall on hooks? A- Yes, sir, with a shelf above it. Q- Now did you put any cloakrooms in the negro school? A. We used the rear wall for coats and a shelf. Q- Now will you answer my question, please, sir. Did y°u put any cloakrooms there the same as you did in the white school? 214 Mr. McGregor: I think counsel again interjects in the premise a state ment that the witness has not made, that there were cloak rooms put anywhere. The Court: I do not understand that they were cloakrooms. I under stand it was a place behind the blackboard where they put their clothes up. Mr. Durman: Thank you, Your Honor. I was misled. The Court: Yes. Q. Now, the four rooms in the addition you made to the negro school were to be used, I believe you testified, for high school work. Is that right? A. I did not say. I had no idea what they would be used for. Q. Well, were any steel lockers put in those four rooms that you put in the negro school? A. No. Q. No lockers at all? A. No lockers, no steel lockers. Q. Now I will show you what has been introduced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 30. I believe there is a recess in back of the blackboard in the white school? A. That is right. Q. I will ask you to examine the room you built in the negro school? A. That is right. Q. Is there any recess there? A. There is no recess there. 215 Q. No recess? A. Because there are no toilets in there to give you that otherwise lost space. Q. Were there toilets placed in each classroom in the white school? A. Placed between each two classrooms. Q. Were any toilets placed between the classrooms in the negro school? A. They were not. Q. Where were the toilets placed? A. The toilets were—the present toilets were at the ends of these wings there. Q. Then in the negro school in order for a child to reach the toilet or the restroom he had to leave the classroom and go to the back of the building? A. Yes. Q. Thank you. Now you had nothing to do with the construction of that white high school? A. White high school? Q. Yes. A. No. Q. Thank you. Now what kind of windows did you put in the negro school? A. Projected, steel projected. Q. That is the window similar to that window shown in Defendants’ Exhibit No. 3? A. No, that is not the same window. That is a wood, double hung window. Q. Oh, pardon me. A. That is a wood double hung window also. Did you ask me about Hermes? Q. No, in the colored school? A. In Randolph all the windows are wood double hung windows. 216 Q, Thank you. What type of windows did you put in the Hermes School? A. Commercial projected. Q. Is there any difference in the cost of those windows? A. Due to the difference in size I don’t believe I can answer that. It is quite possible they might be very close to the same cost because one is considerably smaller than the other. Q. Now did you put glass brick in the Hermes School? A. We did not. Q. There was no glass brick put in the white elemen tary school? A. There is directional glass blocks in the white elementary school. Q. That is what I am talking about. Isn’t that the Hermes School? A. Yes, that is right. Q. Now, for what purpose were those glass bricks put in there? A. They are put in there for what we call natural day lighting. They are directional blocks and they throw the light and diffuse to the ceiling, and it is a form of light ing developed by Dr. Harmon whom I previously men tioned, which a great many of us feel is a very good form of lighting. Q. Now in the fusion of light through glass brick there is no adjustment of the brick. They are stationary and the light is diffused in the same manner at all times. That is true, isn’t it? A. I believe that is true. Q. That is the theory that is accepted? A. That is right, where it breaks the same each time. It depends on the angle from which the light strikes. Q. So long as the light strikes it from the same angle the fusion of light is the same? 217 A. Yes. Q. And the members of your profession agree, I be lieve, that possibly that is the best lighting system and the best fusion of lighting at this time. That is accepted? A. That is right. Some of us feel that way. Q. I believe, Mr. Page, the majority of the architectural authorities now agree on that theory of fusion of light, don’t they? A. I wouldn’t think it is the majority. There is a great deal of wrangling between the bilateral system which I mentioned, bilateral and trilateral, against this Harmon system of lighting. California leans very heavily towards the other system. Q. But I believe you testified you were inclined to lean— A. I like the Harmon system. Q. Then is it your opinion as an architect and an ex pert that the lighting system in the Hermes School is superior to the lighting system in the Randolph School with this glass brick? , A. The natural daylighting. The natural daylighting. There is a difference there. The natural daylighting of Hermes, I feel is superior to Randolph. Q. And in your opinion is that advantageous to stu dents studying in school? A. That is right. Q. Thank you. I believe you stated with reference to the open corridor that the accepted theory was that the reason that the open corridor was of the better type by that school of thought which agrees on that proposition was that you had windows on the inside of the corridor and on the outside? A. I said that is one of the reasons. Q. That is one? A. Just one. 218 Q. That is one. And I believe that is the theory upon which the majority of the architects and those people in your field, chosen field, accept the open corridor as pre senting the best fusion of light. Now were there any windows on the inside of this open corridor in the Randolph School? A. There are not, and the building, present building, you see, would have formed a block against that. Q. The truth of the situation is that this open corridor was built up against another old building, wasn’t it? A. That is right. It was joined to the present—the then present structure. Mr. Durham: We pass the witness, Your Honor. Re-Direct Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. In answering the questions a while ago in reference to the lighting of those rooms did you, in all your answers in reference to those questions, have to do with day lighting? A. We were speaking of glass blocks and I pointed out that I was speaking of natural daylighting. Q. Both the Hermes and this Randolph school are suitably lighted for night use, are they not? A. I believe, I am not quite certain, but I believe you will find them identical. Q. I see. Now, the diffusion system that you stated was different from the glass brick, does that involve the fractionation of light by the type of shield that is shown in Defendants’ Exhibit 3? A. Would you please state that question again. Q. Well, you called it the diffusion of light a while ago? 219 A. Yes, Q. Or fractionation of light. I am not quite sure. Is that other theory involved in the use of that light shield which you have there? A. Yes, sir, that is right. It is to throw light. Q. And one school is upholding that system and an other is talking about use of glass brick, isn’t it, in lay language? A. No, not quite. That is used in many cases, but I be lieve that the same man developed both theories. Q. In other words, it can be used— A. Dr. Harmon, I believe, is responsible for the light baffle, and I believe he is responsible for what we call the Harmon directional glass block lighting. Q. In any event, laying aside the discussion of the distribution of light by the glass block and by this frac tionation system, are these rooms in both the Randolph School and the old white high school and the Hermes School equally well lighted regardless of the glass brick and the fractionation implementation? Mr. Durham: We object to that question. It calls for a conclusion and opinion of the witness. He has joined the lighting in the old high school. The witness has testified he had nothing to do with the construction of that. The Court: Read the question. (Question read.) The Court: Objection overruled. He may answer if he knows. 220 Q. From daylight? A. From daylight? Well, it would certainly be my opinion that the daylighting of Hermes, not of the high school, of Hermes, would be somewhat superior to the other two. Of the high school, I have seen it, of course, I would say, both with light baffles, the two would be comparable. In fact, I would say the colored school has more windows, I believe in some cases, then some of the class rooms in the white school although, as I say, I am not entirely familiar with the high school. I have been through it. Mr. McGregor: That is all. Re-Cross Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q1. Now Mr. Page, I believe you stated that it is your opinion that the Hermes School, elementary white, is sup erior as far as the lighting system is concerned than the negro school which you designed? A. The daylighting. Q. Yes, I am talking about that. Well, is it your ex perience that the children go to school in the daytime? A. Well, certainly, but you referred to lighting in the school when very often the lighting of the school is re ferred to as the electrical outlet. When we refer to the glass blocks—it is probably a nomenclature—you state “daylighting” so there may be some differentiation. I think that the Hermes is superior. Q. All right. Now you advised with the Herne School Board with reference to your opinion as to the superiority 221 of the system of lighting as put in the elementary school, didn’t you? A. Yes. Mr. McGregor: I move that the question and answer be stricken. I don’t know what Herne has to do with this case. Mr. Durham: Pardon me. I mean the Hermes School. I will get the record straight. Q. Mr. Page, you did advise with the school officials of the LaGrange School District with reference to your opin ion as to the superiority of the lighting system placed in the Hermes School, is that right? A. That is partially correct. I did tell them we con sidered that the best form of lighting. I don’t recall that there was any comparison set up. Certainly not that I recall. Mr. Durham: That is all. We are through. The Court: Stand aside. Mr. McGregor: Just a second. Would Your Honor wait just a second, please. That is all, Your Honor. The Court: Stand aside. 222 Mr. McGregor: Now as I asked this witness to come in out of order, map I ask that he be excused so that he can return to Austin? The Court: You may be excused, Mr. Page. Call Mr. Lemmons back. C. A. LEMMONS, was recalled and testified as follows: Direct Examination (Continued). By Mr. Durham: Q. Mr. Lemmons, will you please take in your hand the annual—the superintendent’s annual report for the LaGrange Independent School District for the school year 1947-1948? A. Yes. Q. And also for 1948-1949? A. I have it. Mr. Durham: I want to mark them for identification, please. (The documents were marked as “Defendants’ Exhibits 37 and 38,” respectively.) Q. Now, Mr. Lemmons, you were requested in a sub poena duces tecum to bring with you the original letter and a petition filed by the plaintiff’s attorney dated De cember 5, 1947. Did you bring them with you? A. I did. Q. Would you let me see that, please? A. It is in that box over there. May I get it? The Court: Yes, sir. 223 (The document was marked as “Defendants’ Exhibit 39.” ) Q. Mr. Lemmons, you hold in your hand the annual re port, a copy of which is filed with the State Superinten dent, for the school year 1947-1948 and marked as Plaintiff’s Exhibit 38. A. Just a minute. What year was that? Q. 1947-1948. A. That is Exhibit 37. Q. Was that instrument prepared by you or under your supervision and direction? A. It was prepared under my supervision and direction. Q. And as part of the permanent school records of the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Yes. Q- And the entries made in there reflected the correct listing of property owned by the LaGrange Independent School District? A. In so far as the records which were available, yes. Q. In so far as the records—and the collection and expenditures of money, disbursements, for school pur poses? A. This report does not cover the disbursements. This report mainly has to do with child distribution throughout the system and it also carries a table of evaluations of school property on page 11. Q. Now I will ask you to turn to— Mr. Durham: We offer in evidence, Your Honor, Exhibit No. 37. It is for the school year 1947-1948. 224 Mr. McGregor: It is the one you prepared, Mr. Lemmons? A. It was prepared under my direction, yes. Mr. McGregor: I have no objection. Mr. Durham: To save time we also offer 1947-1948, which is Ex hibit 37. The Court: You have just offered that one. Mr. Durham: I am sorry. I want to offer Exhibit No. 38, which is the superintendent’s annual report for the school year 1948-1949. The Court: That makes two that you are putting in, 37 and 38? Mr. Durham: Yes, sir. I offer them in evidence. Mr. McGregor: Counsel, I have not seen the Exhibit 38. Mr. Durham: I did not know. I thought you had seen it. Mr. McGregor: May I ask the witness a question, please, sir? The Court: Yes, sir. 225 (By Mr. McGregor): Q. This Exhibit 38, is that signed by you? A. No. Q. Is Exhibit No. 37 signed by you? A. I don’t believe that is my signature on that. Mr. McGregor: Are you offering a copy that you are producing? Mr. Durham: I am offering the one that he says was prepared under his supervision. Mr. McGregor: I have no objection to it. Mr. Durham: I want to offer the one Mr. Lemmons had. A. This is the one right here and it has my signature on it. Mr. McGregor: No objection to that. (“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 37 and 38” were received in evi dence.) Q. Now both Exhibits 37 and 38 were prepared by you or under your direction? A. Yes. Q'. And those exhibits are part of the permanent school records of LaGrange Independent School District? 226 A. They are. Q. And they accurately, as far as your records are concerned, reflect the daily average attendance of both negro and white students? A. They do. Q. And they also reflect the correct number or the total number of scholastic enrollments? A. Yes. Q. Now I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, to turn to page 11 in Exhibit No. 37. Will you tell the Court what the total scholastic enrollment was for the scholl year 1947- 1948 of white students in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Are you referring to table 19? Q. Table 19, information about— A. That information is about scholastics, and that re fers to the scholastic population of the district. Q. That is right. The scholastic population of the district. A. The scholastic of the LaGrange District for white was 1,073. Q. What was the scholastic population of negroes for the same time? A. 524. Q. Now I will ask you to turn to the top of page 11 on the same exhibit, No. 37. Will you tell the Court what the value of the buildings for elementary schools for white children was in the LaGrange Independent School District for the school year 1947-1948? A. $10,000.00. Q. What was the value of the school buildings for negroes for the same year? A. $1,000.00. Q. Will you tell the Court what the value of the build ings for school purposes owned by the LaGrange Indepen 227 dent School District and furnished for white children was for the same period of time? A. You mean the total value? Q- No, the buildings alone. For Senior High School? A. For Senior High School, $175,000.00. Q. And what was the value of the property furnished negro children for a Senior High School for the same year? A. $20,000.00. Q. Now, for school sites and playgrounds for the same period of time, that is, the school year 1947-1948, what was the value for the school sites for elementary schools for white? Mr. McGregor: I am going to object to all this line of questioning. The dollar and cents value are not of issue in this case. The question is whether the facilities supplied are substantially equal to those that are supplied to the white children in the district. The Court: I think the dollars and cents value may throw some light on it, Counsel. Objection overruled. Mr. McGregor: Very well. Note our exception. Q. What was the value, please? A. Would you restate your question? Q. What was the value of money invested in school sites and playgrounds for elementary schools for whites? A. $1,000.00. Q. What was the amount invested for negro children? A. There is no figure entered there because that was a combination high school and elementary school. 228 Q. All right. Now, what amount of money was invested as of the year 1947-1948, school year, for school sites for senior high schools for white? A. $10,000.00. Q. And for negroes for the same period of time? A. $2,000.00. Q. Now, for school furniture and desks for white child ren during the same period of time, how much money was invested as of the year 1947-1948? A. Are you referring to the elementary? Q. Elementary school? A. $500.00. Q. What for negro? A. There is nothing entered there. Q. Now in the high school for white during the same period of time, how much money was invested? A. $5,000.00. Q. How much for negroes during the same period of time? A. $2,000.00. Q. Now, for a teacher’s home for high school teachers for whites, how much money was invested as of the year 1947-1948? A. $5,000.00. Q. How much for negroes? A. None. Q. For equipment for teaching laboratory courses at the elementary school for whites, how much was invested as of 1947-1948 school year? A. $100.00. Q. How much for negro? A. $50.00. Q. Now in the high school how much was invested for the same period of time and for the same purpose? A. The figure entered is $3,000.00. 229 Q. And how much for negro children? A. $1,050.00. Q. Now for the cost of public libraries for elementary schools for white children as of the year 1947-1948, how much money was invested? A. $500.00. Q. How much for negro children in the elementary school? A. None. Q. How much was invested in the white school for white children? A. $3,000.00. Q. How much for negroes? A. $500.00. Q. For equipment for teaching music, how much was invested for white children in the elementary school? A. $200.00. Q. How much for whites in the high school? A. $800.00. Q. How much for negroes in the elementary school? A. None, because it all went into one building. Q. And how much for the negro high school? A. $500.00. Q. Now was any money spent for audio-visual aid in the elementary school for whites as of that year? A. $500.00. Q. Any spent for negro children in the elementary school? A. No. Q. How much was spent in the high school for whites for audio-visual aid? A. $500.00. Q. How much for colored? A. None. 230 Q. In your opinion, Mr. Lemmons, as an educator, do you think that audio-visual aids are of educational value in teaching in the schools? A. They are. Q. Now the equipment for playgrounds; how much was spent for whites as of the year 1947? A. I believe that that term “spent”— Q. Was invested? A. No. These figures do not represent the amount of money spent during the school year. Q. I don’t mean that. A. Well— Mr. McGregor: Well, let the witness answer. A. I am afraid I am giving misleading answers here. Q. All right. A. These figures represent the value of the accumu lated property which is under the jurisdiction of the school. This does not represent the amount of money which has been spent during that year. For example, this teachers’ home that you are referring to there, that has been the property of the school district for a number of years and shows on every report. The school district didn’t buy that teachers’ home during this school year. You see what I mean? Mr. McGregor: In other words, it is just an inventory. Mr. Durham: I am going to object to counsel taking the witness on cross examination. 231 The Court: Let Mr. Durham finish with the witness. Q. That is, the figures which you are giving is the amount of money invested in plants and equipment for negroes and whites over a period of years? A. Yes. Q. And those figures represent property that is set aside for the use and benefit in the educational system in LaGrange School District for the negro race and for the white race? A. Yes. Q. All right. I will ask you to tell the Court how much money was invested in school buildings, school sites, grounds, teachers’ homes, equipment for teaching labora tory courses, for the public school library, equipment for teaching music and the other equipment which was in vested as of the school year 1947-1948 for the benefit of white children. What was the total of that property? A. $250,950.00. Q. What was the value of the property owned and used at that time for the use and benefit of the education of negro children? A. This entry is not totaled right here. I will have to total it. $163,200.00. The Court: What? Mr. McGregor: Will you say it so we can all hear it, please, sir. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, I would like for him to add it again. 232 A. Let me add it. I made a mistake, Your Honor. I am sorry. These figures are out of line, Your Honor. I get $61,200.00. The Court: What is the other figure, for the whites? Mr. Durham: $250,950.00. The Court: Mr. Witness, does that include the matters that have been testified about that were finished in September of this year? That is, the new high school and the improvement there in LaGrange? A. No, Your Honor, they do not. The Court: Those figures do not include those improvements? A. No, sir. The Court: What is the date of your report? A. June 17, 1948? The Court: June 17, 1948? A. Yes, sir. The Court: Well now, you are figuring on 1948. He has not asked you the figures for 1948-1949 yet, has he? 233 Mr. Durham: No, sir. Q. Now, Mr. Lemmons, I will ask you to check the figures on the instrument I hold in my hand with reference to the investment made in property for negroes and see if those figures represent the same figures that you have just added up, the same amount? A. Yes. I believe I carried a $25,000.00 sub-total in as a separate entry on that. They are out of line and they are hard to figure. $36,200.00. I would like to correct my self there. I made an error in it. I added a $25,000.00 sub total into this. Q. Then according to your figures as superintendent, as of the school year 1947-1948, the school board of the Independent School District of LaGrange had invested the sum of $250,950.00 for the education of white students, and $36,200.00 for negro students? A. Yes. Q. I will ask you, if you will, to figure the per capita investment. I believe you had 1,073 scholastic enrollment in the white school, potential, and 524 in the negro school. A. Do you want that carried out in cents or just— Q. Oh, no, no. Just round figures? A. If I did not make an error in these figures, the per capita investment for white children was $233.00 and for colored was $69.00. Q. Up until the school year of 1947-1948 this Indepen dent School District of LaGrange had invested, per capita, for whites $233.00 or approximately that, for each white child in the district, a capital investment for facilities and equipment? A. Yes. 234 Q. And for the same period of time they had an investment of $69.00 or thereabouts, per capita, ac cording to your figures— Mr. McGregor: For what, Counsel? Q. Capital investments for the education of negro children? A. Yes. Q. Now will you please pick up what has been in troduced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 38. A. Yes. Q. Will you turn to page 11 of Exhibit No. 38 and will you tell the Court what was the total capital in vestment for the education of white children in the LeGrange Independent School District? A. $450,050.00. Q. Now what was the total capital investment for the education of negro children as of the same date? A. $105,800.00. The Court: As of what time, now, is this? A. This was up to June 21, 1949, Your Honor. The Court: I will ask the question I asked a while ago. Does this $450,000.00 include the improvements there in La- Grange? A. Yes, sir. 235 The Court: Which were completed in September of this year? A. Yes, sir. The Court: And the $105,800.00 for negroes, does that include their improvements? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now I notice, Mr. Lemmon, on page 11, line 3 of Exhibit No. 38 there is an item, grounds for work ing in agriculture, and under the high school, value $5,000.00. Will you tell the Court what that is? A. That is a portion or a part of a tract of land that was donated to the school by Mr. William Hermes in LaGrange. Q. The title is in the school board, is it not? A. It is. Q. And it is owned by the school board? A. It is. Q. Now for what purpose is it used? A. It is used for—there are a number of barns that are equipped to take care of the feeding of beef cattle. They can feed four or five beef cattle out there at one time. There are four or five barns used to house hogs. Q. It is used in connection with the teaching of your agricultural service, is it not? A. It is. Q. It is animal husbandry, I believe they call it? A. We don’t go that far. Q. In the agriculture department of the high school? A. Yes. 236 Q. And it is used as part of the practice teaching of agriculture, is it not? A. Well, it is used as a laboratory field. Q. That is right, laboratory field. Now do you con sider it of any educational value in the instruction in the subject of agriculture? A. It is of some value, yes. Q. Now have you one for the negro school? A. We do not. The Court: You say that was given to the LaGrange School Dis trict? A. Yes, sir. The Court: Did he make any restriction about whether it should be used for whites or negroes? A. He did not specify, I don’t believe. The Court: Go ahead. Q. Now are negro pupils permitted to use that piece of land in connection with their instructions in agriculture? A. They have never been refused the use of it. Q. Have they ever used it? A. No. Q. Has it been prescribed as a part of their course in agriculture, in agricultural subjects? A. They are required to conduct their projects just as the white boys are. 237 Q. I am talking about this particular piece of property. A. No, it has not been prescribed that they work up there. Q. And you have no piece of land, real estate, there in connection with their instructions in agriculture, similar to this? A. No. Mr. Durham: That is all, Your Honor. The Court: I take it your examination will be longer than the three or five minutes which are remaining. Mr. McGregor: Your Honor, I imagine Mr. Lemmons’ examination will take about two hours. The Court: Very well. The Court will adjourn till 9:30 in the morning. (Adjourned at 4:30 p. m.) December 7, 1949. 9:30 a. m. The Court: All right. You may proceed. Mr. McGregor: Mr. Lemmons, take the stand, please. 238 C. A. LEMMONS, resumed the stand and testified as follows: Cross Examination. By Mr. McGregor: (Photographs were marked as “ Defendants’ Ex hibits 5 to 22,” inclusive.) Q. Mr. Lemmons, would you please tell the Court how many actual plants are in the LaGrange Indepen dent School District? A. There are five. Q. Five. Would you tell the Court where they are located, please, by name preferably? A. There is a high school building for the white lo cated in LaGrange which has the high school and the seventh and eighth grades of the elementary school. There is an elementary school building for white lo cated in LaGrange which has the first six grades of elementary school. There is a negro high school lo cated in LaGrange in conjunction with an elementary school for negroes which is used by all the negro students within the LaGrange Independent School District. There is an elementary school located at Ellinger for whites, for white children, and there is the elementary school located at Warda for white elementary children. The Court: The Warda and Ellinger High School students, do thev go into LaGrange? A. Yes, sir. They come in on the school bus. 239 The Court: And all of the negro students throughout the dis trict come into LaGrange, both for elementary grades and high school grades? A. That is correct, Your Honor. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 6, Mr. Lem mons, and ask you what that is? A. It is a picture, it is a correct representation of the Ellinger white elementary school. Mr. McGregor: I introduce this in evidence as Defendants’ Exhibit 6 . Mr. Durham: We have no objection. The Court: Have you seen it? Mr. Durham: Your Honor, we have seen it. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 6” was received in evi dence.) Q. Now, on Defendants’ Exhibit 6 would you tell the Court what view of that school that is, as to whether that is the front, back or side? A. This is the front view of the building and the front playground. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 7 and ask you what that is? A. This is a side view of the same building, facing west. 240 Mr. McGregor: I introduce 7 into evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 7” was received in evi dence.) Q. I see on Exhibit 7 what appears to be a water tank on the right hand side. Is that the water supply for the school? A. It is. Q. And what are those cylindrical tanks here in the foreground? A. They are butane gas tanks. Q. I see. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit— The Court: Just one minute. Mr. McGregor: Yes, sir. The Court: This Exhibit, Defendants’ Exhibit 7, is the rear of the Ellinger School? A. It is the side view, Your Honor. The Court: Side view? A. Yes, sir. The Court: I see. 241 Q, I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 5 and ask you what that is? A. This is another side view of the Ellinger school system. I believe this one is facing east. Mr. McGregor: I introduce this in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 5” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 9 and ask you what that is? A. This is a side view of the Ellinger School show ing the water fountain. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 9 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 9” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 8 and ask you what that is? A. This is a view of the west side of—correct re presentation of the west side of the Ellinger School System. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 8 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 8” was received in evi dence.) 242 The Court: This is still Ellinger? A. Yes, Your Honor. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 11 and ask you what that is? A. That is a bookcase in a classroom in the Ellin ger School. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 11 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 11” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 12 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph and a correct representa tion of the drinking fountain inside of the Ellinger school building. Mr. McGregor: We introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 12 into evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 12” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 14 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph and a correct representa tion of a portion of the kitchen in the Ellinger lunch room at the Ellinger School. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 14 in evidence. 243 ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 14” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 13 and ask you what that is? A. That is a photograph and a correct representa tion of a portion of the playgrounds at the Ellinger Elementary School. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 13. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 13” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 22 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph and a correct representa tion of a classroom in the Ellinger Elementary School. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 22 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 22” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 21 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph and a correct representa tion of the room in which the children at the Ellinger Elementary School eat their lunches. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 21. 244 ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 21” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 20 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph and a correct representa tion of the cook stove on which the lunches at the Ellinger Elementary School are prepared. Mr. McGregor: I introduce in evidence Defendants’ Exhibit 20. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 20” was received in evi dence.) The Court: Is that a gas stove or butane gas stove ? A. It is butane gas, Your Honor. Q. I hand you Defendants, Exhibit No. 19 and ask you what that is? A. That is another photograph of an elementary classroom in the Ellinger Elementary School and this is a correct representation of it. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 19 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 19” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 18 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph and a correct representa tion of the stage and the gymnasium in the Ellinger Elementary School. 245 Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 18 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 18’ ’ was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 17 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph of a classroom in the Ellin- ger Elementary school, which is a correct representa tion of it, and it shows the rear view of the room and the gas heater. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 17 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 17” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 10 and ask you what that is? A. That is another photograph of the Ellinger gym nasium and auditorium and it shows the stage and the basket ball goal. This is a correct representa tion of the building. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 10 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 10” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you herewith Defendants’ Exhibit 15 and ask you what that is? 246 A. This is a photograph of a portion of the boys’ restroom in the Ellinger Elementary School and it is a correct representation of the restroom. Mr. McGregor: We introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 15 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 15” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 16 and ask you what that is? A. This is another photograph of a portion of the boys’ restroom in the Ellinger Elementary School and it is a correct representation of it. Mr. McGregor: We introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 16 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 16” was received in evi dence.) Q. Returning now to Defendants’ Exhibits 10 and 18, the two photographs of the gymnasium at the Ellinger School, I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, if there is any heat in that gymnasium? A. No, sir, there is not. Q. I will ask you if the gymnasium is lighted? A. It is lighted with several small light outlets in the ceiling but there are no reflectors on them. Q. I see. Now, on the back of Defendants’ Exhibit 10 I see on the right hand side looking into the picture a door ajar. What is inside the room where that door is ajar? A. That room is used for the kitchen, for preparing the meals for the children at Ellinger School. 247 Q. Is it inside that room where the stove is re flected on Defendants’ Exhibit 20? A. Yes, it is. Q. I believe you have identified this Exhibit 21 as being the place where the students eat their lunch at the Ellinger School, is that correct? A. Yes, sir. Q. Where is the view in Defendants’ Exhibit 21 in reference to the place you have located the kitchen in Defendants’ Exhibit 10? A. It is directly across the gymnasium from the stage. It is located directly across the back side of the gymnasium, from the point from which this pic ture was taken. Q. Is the gymnasium to the back of this building or to the front? A. The gymnasium is to the back of it. Q. And is the eating place to the back, the right, the left or in which direction? A. It is to the front. Q. In other words, this eating place is on the front of the building? A. It is. Q. About how far is it from the kitchen to the place where the children eat? A. Probably 80 or 90 feet. Q. Now in Exhibit No. 11, Defendants’ Exhibit 11, you have identified that as a picture of a bookcase at the Ellinger School. I will ask you what those books represent in reference to the Ellinger School? A. Those are the library books that are used by the children in the sixth, seventh and eighth grades. Q. Is that bookcase and the library supplies that you have just testified to reflected in Defendants’ Ex hibit 17? A. Yes, it is. 248 Q. In other words, the bookcase is found in Ex hibit 17. Is that your testimony? A. Yes, I believe so. Q. Is that in one of the classrooms? A. It is. Q. And by the way, Mr. Lemmons, up until the school year 1947-1948, how were books acquired for the children in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Some of the library books were bought by the Parent Teachers Association. The remainder of them for the high school were bought from library fees which were collected at the rate of a dollar per stud ent for every student in high school. Q. In other words, no tax money went into the purchase of books prior to the school year 1947-1948? A. No, sir. Q. Since the school year 1947-1948 has the La- Grange Independent School District taken any steps— Mr. McGregor: May I withdraw that, please? The Court: Yes. Q. This library fee and contribution to the library, first as to the fee, that fee, how was it exacted? A. The fee was collected by the principal of the various schools and the books were approved in my office and ordered and we drew a check on the library account to pay the bills. Q. Was there any compulsion to pay the fee? A. There was. Q. Was there any compulsion to pay the fee in the negro school? 249 A. Yes, there was. Q. Were those fees paid? A. Some of them were and some of them were not. Q. Were the fees as paid in the negro school used to purchase books? A. They were administered in the same fashion. Q. And were all of the funds collected from the negro school as fees, library fees, used in purchas ing of books for the negro school? A. There were. Q. Was there, at that time, any requirement in the tax structure of the LaGrange Independent School District a requirement that any of the residents, citi zens or anyone domiciled in the LaGrange Indepen dent School District, had to pay that tax? A. I don’t understand your question. Q. I will frame it differently. Is there anything in the tax structure requiring a payment of the library fee? Mr. Durham: Your Honor, I want to make an objection. The tax structure, we object to it. This tax statute or pro vision in the Independent School District as to the requirements of these taxes, that tax structure, what ever it may be, would be the best evidence. The Court: You are right, but I think he is asking this witness what he knows about it. That would be the best evi dence and the only evidence I could follow, I mean, the law itself would be what I would have to follow. Go ahead. 250 Q. Were there any taxes exacted in the district and applied to the purchase of books? A. No, sir. The Court: Well, this tax of $1.00 per student— A. Yes, Your Honor. The Court: —a year, that was collected from the white students and the negro students? A. Yes, sir. The Court: And were the funds of the two intermingled or kept separate? A. They were kept separate. The Court: The negro funds were used for the negroes and the white funds for the white? A. Yes, Your Honor. Q. Now in addition to this library contribution— The Court: Just one minute. You said it was compulsory. What did you do if it wasn’t paid? A. We held the grades for one semester. You know, we did not give the report cards for one semester. If we found the student couldn’t pay it, we gave them 251 the cards and there was no penalty attached. That was a local school rule and there is no law or statute concerning it. Q. Now since the school year 1947-1948 have any additional provisions been made for the purchase of books? A. Yes, there have been. Q. Please tell the Court what those provisions are? A. We appropriate $1.00 per student enrolled in each of the various schools to be used by the princi pal in buying library material for that particular school. Q. Have you done that uniformly throughout the five respective institutions since the school year 1947- 1948? A. Yes. Q. And have you utilized those funds per capita in the negro school in the same way that you have in the white? A. Yes. Q. Now in addition to the assessments of $1.00 per student that was utilized for the purchase of books, was there any other method of getting funds from the library to purchase books with? A. The fines which were collected on overdue books were used. The Parent Teachers Association bought a number of different volumes for the library. Q. Which Parent Teachers Association? A. The white Parent Teachers Association. Q. Did the colored Parent Teachers Association buy any books for the school? A. Not to my knowledge. Q. I see. All right. Now then, these fines. Were fines collected at the negro school? A. They were supposed to be collected. 252 Q. Well, did you ever receive any? A. No. That fund was administered by the negro principal. Q. Did he have the authority to purchase what ever books he desired out of that fund? A. He did. Q. The funds that were collected on fines in the white school, who administered that? A. The librarian in the white school and the white school principal. Q. What about the principal at Ellinger and over at Warda? Do they have equal rights to administer their funds that they collected on the fines? A. They did. Q. Now on Defendants’ Exhibit 21, on the right hand side, I see what appears to be a bookcase some what similar to the bookcase in Defendants’ Exhibit 11? A. Yes, sir. Q. Is that some more of the books of the Ellinger School? A. It is. Q. How many children for the year 1948-1949 were in the Ellinger School, Mr. Lemmons? A. I have the present year, 1949-1950. Q. All right. Give us the present school year, 1949- 1950. A. We have 44 children enrolled in the Ellinger School this year. Q. In this Exhibit 17, Exhibit 19 and Exhibit 22, classrooms at the Ellinger School, I will ask you how many grades are in the Ellinger School? A. There are eight grades, total, in the Ellinger School. 253 Q. And how many classrooms are actually used in the teaching of those eight grades? A. Two. Q. In other words, how are those grades assigned to use those two classrooms? A. Well, the first four grades are combined in one room, and the last four grades are combined in the other room. Q. I see. So at the Ellinger School you have four grades in one classroom and four grades in another classroom? A. Yes, sir. The Court: How far is Ellinger from LaGrange? A. Thirteen miles, Your Honor. Q. Now Defendants’ Exhibits 7, 8, 13, 5 and 6, those exhibits as enumerated give a composite view of the complete school plat at Ellinger? A. Yes, they do. Q. Are there any sidewalks around that school? A. There is only one sidewalk. Q. Where is it located? A. It is located in front of the building and it forms a “ Y ” and goes to two different doors. Q. I see. A. I believe that is the only sidewalk. Q. Is that the one that comes in from the street? A. Yes, it is. It com es in from the front street. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibits 15 and 16, which I believe you have identified as the boys’ lava tory and toilets. Is that the same type service or a similar service that is maintained for the girls at the Ellinger School? 254 A. It is. Q. I will ask you if the facilities shown on these two exhibits are the entire facilities for the boys at Ellinger School? A. They are. Q. Is the like type facility maintained for the girls at Ellinger School? A. Yes, sir, similar. Q. Can you tell me approximately how many stud ents eat a day from your paid lunchroom at Ellinger, as a daily average? A. There was an average of 39 during October. Q. I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, if Defendants’ Exhibits 19, 17 and 22 are all of the same classroom? A. Yes, I believe they are. Q. I will ask you then if the other classroom is in anywise similar to this one? A. It is similar, yes. Q. In Defendants’ Exhibit 17 I see in the right hand corner an instrument which you have testified is the heater. What kind of a heater is that, Mr. Lemmons? A. That is a Bronte. That is the trade name, Bronte. It is a Bronte heater with a thermostat control below it to control the temperature of the room and there is a fan behind it to circulate the air. The Court: That is a butane gas heater, too? A. Yes, sir. Q. In Plaintiff’s Exhibit 26 I see a heater in the right hand corner. I will ask you if the system of heat ing employed there is the same as in the exhibit, De fendants, No. 17, which is shown you? 255 A. It is similar. It operates on the same principle except on Plaintiff’s Exhibit 26 the heat is furnished from hot water instead of gas being burned. Q. And I will ask you if on Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 32 there is a heater in the right hand center corner of the portrait? A. Yes, there is. Q. And I will ask you if that operates on the same principle as the heater shown in Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 26? A. It does, except this heater on Plaintiff’s Exhibit 32 is a gas heater, and this one on 26 is a hot water heater. Q. Incidentally, Mr. Lemmons, where does this hot water come from that operates the heater in Plain tiff’s Exhibit 26? A. From a gas fired furnace which is in another part of the building. Q. Does the same furnace supply the hot water for the kitchen of this— A. No, it does not. Q. It does not. Now we were about, a while ago, to go into the question of the steps the school district was now taking, that is, following the school year 1947-1948, to build up the libraries in its respective in stitutions. I will ask you what the district has done, beginning with the year 1948, and what it is doing now in the procuring of a library fund and the building up of the respective libraries in its various plants? A. We apropriate a dollar per student for each plant for the purpose of library books and library ma terial and other materials to be used in the mainten ance and operation of the library. Q- In other words, then, it is a fund to do more than just purchase books. It is to maintain the what? 256 A. To maintain the library. Q. In other words, to cover the entire maintenance of the library, furniture, fixtures and books? A. No. It is just for the books and the supplies used to mend the books and charge-out cards and envelopes that go in the back of the books, and things of that nature. Q. Those funds now that you are talking about, are those funds coming from the taxpayers of the dis trict? A. Yes. Q. Do you still collect the fines and the library fee of $1.00? A. No, we collect only the fines. We do not collect the library fee from anyone. Q. Have you abolished the library fee in all the schools attended by the whites? A. Yes. Q. Have you abolished the library fee in the negro school? A. We have. The Court: They are fined when they keep a book out too long? A. Yes, Your Honor, over five days. Q. Now when did you start that allocation of that fine? A. I believe we started that in the 1948-1949 school year. Q. Since starting it has it been administered on the basis that you have just testified to? A. Yes. The prinicpal submits a list of books which have been approved by his librarian in the various schools and then those books are ordered, and when 257 they arrive they are allocated to the various schools for which they were ordered. Q. I see. Has there been a continuation of different people from time to time giving the libraries books? A. Yes. There have been quite a few books given to the white library. For example, PTA, the Parent Teachers Association, had a book drive at the begin ning of this present school year and various members bought books from a number of books on an ap proved list and gave them to the library. Q. I see. And those books that have been donated to the LaGrange white school there, are they a part of the some 3700 I believe you stated, or some 3000— my recollection is not accurate as to your state ments—are they a part of that number of books which you testified to on direct examination yesterday? A. Yes, sir. Q. Mr. Scott testified here early in this case and you heard his testimony where they had a Parent Teachers Association meeting at the negro school. And you heard him testify that they discussed the possibility of buying a moving picture projector for the negro school. Do you know whether or not the Negro Parent Teachers Association has bought any books or given any books to the negro school? A. I do not know of a purchase of books over there by the Parent Teachers Association. Q. Can you testify then that so far as you know there has been no such purchase? A. Yes, I can. Q. Would it have cleared through your office and would you have known about it if such purchase had been made from the approved list? A. I believe I would. 258 (Photographs were marked as “ Defendants’ Ex hibits 23 to 30,” inclusive.) Q. Now, Mr. Lemmons, in the examination of Mr. Jackson, the agriculture teacher at the negro school, he was asked what activities they were carrying on there and what he was teaching. And on yesterday you were asked whether or not one of the items on your 1947-1948 or 1948-1949, I don’t know from which, but your report, indicated a donation to the school of some two thousand dollars worth of property and you were asked if that property was used as a demon stration area for agriculture work. I will ask you, first, from whom did that piece of property come? A. That property came from Mr. William Hermes of LaGrange. Q. And what was the purpose that it was donated for? A. It was donated for use by the FFA boys. That is the Future Farmers of America, and that is part of a tract of land that he donated. Q. Well now, I am asking what did he donate the tract of land for? A. For that purpose and for the erection of the white elementary school only. Q. Does that land lie contiguously with the tract of land on which the old school stands at LaGrange? A. Yes, it does. Q. And in asking you about the use of those build ings there you were asked whether or not there was any such activity at the negro school. I believe your answer was that there was not. I will ask you if in the preceding years there has been any similar ac tivity at the negro school? A. There has been. 259 Q. What has been the nature of that activity? A. There were several pens for hogs and hog houses built up there for the NFA boys to use. Q. I see. I judge from your statement that that has now been abandoned at the negro school? A. Yes. It is not in operation this year. Q. Was it in operation up until this year? A. I believe it was. Q. By the way, this piece of land that Mr. Hermes gave for the erection of the school, where does that lie in the City of LaGrange? It is in the City of La- Grange, isn’t it? A. Yes, it is. Q. And about how far is it from the tract of land occupied by the negro school? A. Approximately one-half to three-quarters of a mile. Q. And it is within the city limits of the City of LeGrange? A. Yes. Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit Exhibit 34 and call your attention to the right hand side of that where I see a shed and ask you if that is the shed that you had reference to yesterday as being utilized by the agriculture club? A. Yes, it is. Q. Do they have any pigs in there now? A. No, they don’t. The Court: That is at what school? Mr. McGregor: That is behind, at the end of the tract of land on the Hermes School and adjacent to the old high school building. 260 The Court: This is Exhibit 34? It says 34 on the back. Mr. McGregor: Well, Your Honor, 'the back marking is the one to use. Q. Now, as a part of your program at the La- Grange Independent School District how is it de termined what courses to actually teach in the school? Now mark you, I am not asking about the offering of courses. I am asking about how it is determined what courses should be taught. A. We make a survey, either in the late spring or the first days of September, first day of school, to see how many children want any particular course which fits into the curriculum, and if we get a suffi cient demand for the course, we teach it. (A document was marked as “ Defendants’ Ex hibit 31,” for identification.) Q. In other words, if you get sufficient demand for a course, you teach it? A. Yes. Q. When you say “ sufficient demand” do you mean that the board—or what do you mean in reference to how the board determines whether or not there is a sufficient demand? A. Ordinarily we require ten or more students. In some cases, we make an exception and teach a course for seven or five, but it depends on the particular situ ation. Q. In other words, you have to determine the econ omic situation to ascertain whether or not it is wise 261 to spend the money to educate the number of children asking for the course, is that what you mean? A. Yes. The Court: Of course, that does not apply with all courses, does it? A. No. We teach the required courses, Your Honor, but that applies to the elective courses in high school. Q. In other words, in all these institutions you give the required courses, is that correct? A. Yes. Q. But any other electives your answer applies to? A , Yes. The Court: Who requires it, the State law or what? A. The State Department of Education. The Court: The State Department of Education has certain re quired grades? A. Yes, sir, and we are required, we have some local requirements ourselves, but most of our require ments are based directly on State Department of Education requirements. Q. Did you, at any time, in any of these institu tions, drop below the State requirements? A. No. Mr. McGregor: Q. Your Honor, may I speak to the witness pri vately while Mr. Durham is examining that? 262 The Court: Yes. Q. I hand you, Mr. Lemmons, what has been marked as Defendants’ Exhibit 31 and ask you what that is? A. That is a pre-registration sheet that is used to make the survey which I was speaking of. Q. Is it sent to all of the plants in your Indepen dent School District? A. Yes. This was used in the one plant in the spring of—late spring of the last school year, during the last three or four days of the school term, and in September I sent it to the colored plants for use over there in their registration. Q. And has either that type or a similar type been in use before? A. No, not a form like this, No, sir. Q. Not a form like that? A. No, sir. Q. Well then, has there been such a system prior to this year in use? A. Yes, there has, a general system. Q. But not reduced to that type form ? A. Not reduced to writing, no, sir. Q. In prior years what method was utilized to de termine from the respective plants as to what courses would be taught? A. The surveys were made in both schools on the first day of registration in the fall and we found that we could not anticipate the demand for elective courses that way so we started this plan to anticipate the demand for elective courses so we could get the teachers and the equipment ready to teach the courses. 263 Q. So Defendants’ Exhibit 31 is now sent to all the plants in the district? A. Yes. Mr. McGregor: I offer in evidence Defendants’ Exhibit 31. ( “ Defendants Exhibit 31” was received in evi dence.) Q. When did you take— The Court: Just one moment. In electing courses did the stu dents have the aid of his teacher? A. Yes, he has the aid of his teacher and he has the aid of his principal. Q. That is true in both schools, for whites and for negroes? A. Yes, sir. Q. When did you take your present position with the LaGrange Independent School District? A. In July of 1946. Q. Did you begin serving in the capacity which you now occupy with that district at that time? A. Yes, sir. Q. In connection with the testimony of Julius Brown and the allegations in the plaintiff’s petition here, there is an allegation that one Vivian Brown applied for chemistry in the school year 1947-1948. To whom did she apply, if you know? A. She applied to me. Q. Do you rem em ber the time of year when that application was made? A. That application was made on Decem ber 5. 264 Q. Nineteen hundred and what? A. 1947, I believe. Q. Was chemistry being taught that year in the negro school? A. No, it wasn’t. Q. Did you receive that year any other applica tions for the teaching of chemistry prior to Decem ber 5, 1947? A. No, sir. Q. Was chemistry, in the school year 1947-1948, a required subject or an elective subject? A. It was an elective subject. Q. Had Vivian Brown applied to anyone in the negro school for this course before she came to you? A. I don’t know. Q. Did you turn down her application for the course during the school year 1947-1948? A. I did. Q. On what grounds? A. On the grounds that the application was made after the school year had been in progress for some— from September until December 5, some three months, and it was impossible to teach a full course of chemistry in the remaining time of the school year. Q. Now, a while ago you testtified that it was necessary for the school board to determine as to elective courses when requests were made for them, whether or not there were a sufficient number of students applying for that elective course to make it economical to present it in that particular school. I will ask you if, since 1946, when you assumed your present position with the LaGrange Independent School District, up until September 1 of 1949, any 265 other person, male or female, has applied for a course in chemistry at the Randolph School? A. You mean up until this present year? Q. Yes, up to September 1 this year? A. I don’t recall of anyone applying for it. Q. So far as you know, has any other person or individual from the Randolph School, up until Sep tember 1, applied to you for that course? A. No. Q. I will ask you if, since you assumed your pres ent position with the Randolph School in 1946, up until September 1 of this year, if biology has been taught at that school? A. I believe it has. Q. Is it being taught at that school this year? A. Yes, it is. Q. I believe in the testimony of Julius Brown there was a statement that on the same occasion Vivian Brown applied to you for biology. I will ask you if on December 5, 1947, she made any such applica tion to you? A. She did not ask for biology. Q. I will ask you if, during the school year 1947- 1948, biology was taught at the Randolph School in LaGrange? A. Yes, it was. Q. Therefore, if Vivian Brown, at the opening of the school, had wanted to take a course in biology there would have been no reason why she could not have taken it? A. There would have been no reason. I believe she was enrolled for it at that time. Q. You believe she was enrolled for it? A. I believe she was. I am not positive, but I believe she was. 266 Q. During the school year 1949-1950, as one of the electives at the Randolph School in LaGrange, is chemistry being taught? A. Yes, sir. Q. Is this the first year, so far as you know, that chemistry is being taught at that school? A. To my recollection, yes, sir. Q. In any event, since you assumed your present position this is the first time that chemistry is being taught. Now what was the laboratory equipment in Randolph School used for prior to September of this year? A. Biology and general science courses. Q. I see. By the way, can you tell me how many chemistry students you now have enrolled in chem istry at the Randolph School? A. Yes, sir. The Court: Is that elective or required? A. It is an elective course, Your Honor. I have 16 enrolled in chemistry. Q. Is that one grade or is that divided into a num ber of grades? A. That is one course, they are taught in one sec tion, one class. Q. I see. How many years of chemistry is offered in the white school at LaGrange? A. Only one year. Q. In other words, you are offering one year of chemistry in the white school and you are offering one year of chemistry in the Randolph School? A. We are. 267 Q. By the way, Mr. Lemmons, after you succeeded to the present position you hold with the LaGrange Independent School District there has been an ex tensive repair, new building and remodeling going on in the LaGrange District, has there not? A. Yes, there has. Q. There has been over that entire period, a con tinual increase of equipment and supplies in all the schools, has there not? A. Yes, there has. (A photostat was marked “ Defendants’ Exhibit 32,” for identification.) Q. And would you tell me approximately when the present building program, that is to say, program that culminated in what is reflected on Defendants’ Exhibit 1 and what is reflected by Plaintiff’s— Mr. McGregor: I will change the form of that question. I do not have the exhibit right at the moment. Q. Will you tell me about when the building pro gram found its most extensive improvement program in the construction of and the addition to and the repair of the Randolph School and the construction of what is now called the Hermes School. In other words, was it this year, last year? A. It started year before last. Q. And is any of the work still going on? A. Yes. The landscaping work has not been com pleted. The installation of various items of equip ment in both buildings, the laying of sidewalks and various other small jobs are yet to be done. The 268 buildings have been finished and the structure com pleted but we have to finish the sidewalks and the landscaping and the fencing and those things. Q. In other words, it has taken about two years to do what you have gotten done so far? A. That is right. Q. Now as a part of this teaching of chemistry at Randolph School, you utilize a room which is reflect ed in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 19. That is correct, isn’t it? A. Yes, it is. Q. In the back of Plaintiff’s Exhibit 19 in what appears to be something of an alcove, I see what ap pears to be upended stools. What are those? A. Those are stools for the chemical laboratory. Q. Are they new or old? A. They are new. Q. Have they recently been put in the institution? A. Yes, sir, within the past 45 days. Q. Where did they come from ? A. I bought them from the American Desk Com pany in Temple, I believe. Q. And what is their purpose? A. They are to be used in that room when the regular laboratory tables are installed. Q. In other words, they are regular stools of the type that is used in a chemistry laboratory? A. Yes. I bought 32 of them when I bought them, and 16 of them I transferred to the colored school and 16 of them to the white laboratory. Q. I see. And I believe you say you now have 16 students in the chemistry course at the Randolph School? A. Yes. 269 Q. Now also in the back of Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 19 I see an open door. Where does that door go? A. That goes into the storeroom, in the chemical laboratory or the science laboratory in Randolph Colored School. (Photographs were marked as “ Defendants’ Exhi bits 33 and 34,” for identification.) Q. I hand you what is marked as Defendants’ Ex hibit 33 and ask you what that is? A. That is a photograph of the interior of the storeroom in the science laboratory in Randolph Colored School. Q. Is that the door that you referred to in Plain tiff’s Exhibit 19? I believe it is. A. Yes, it is. Q. And what is this equipment on the shelves here, Mr. Lemmons? A. There are test tube racks, a balance, model of a steam engine, rings. Q. All right. Generally then, what is it? A. It is general science equipment or equipment for the teaching of science, chemistry and general science. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 33. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 33” was received in evi dence.) Q. Now in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 19 at about the cen ter of the face of it I see some cabinets and I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 34 and ask you what that is? 270 A. That is a photograph of the interior of the cabinets which you referred to. Q. And what is shown, generally, in that photo graph? A. Equipment for teaching science, particularly chemistry and general science. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 34. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 34’ ’ was received in evi dence.) Q. Now in connection with the stools in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 19 which you say you ordered sometime ago and which are reflected there as part of the new equipment for the teaching of science at the Randolph School, I will ask you if you ordered any other equipment? A. Yes, I did. Q. Has it as yet arrived? A. No, it has not. Q. What was the other equipment you ordered? A. Laboratory tables. Q. I will ask you if you have in your possession a blueprint from which you ordered such tables? A. Yes, I do. Q. Was it on that blueprint that you placed your order? A. Yes. It is the blueprint from which I placed my order. (A blueprint was marked as “ Defendants’ Exhibit 35’ ’ for identification.) 271 Mr. McGregor: I introduce in evidence Defendants’ Exhibit 35. (“ Defendants’ Exhibit 35” was received in evidence.) Q. Now I will ask you if you have in your posses sion an acknowledgment of that order? Mr. McGregor: I would like to tear this off up here. It is bound so tight that I don’t want any question about it being mutilated. Will that be satisfactory? Mr. Durham: That will be all right. (A document was marked as “ Defendants’ Exhibit 36” for identification.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 36 and ask you if that is the acknowledgment you referred to of this particular order? A. Yes, it is. Mr. McGregor: I introduce in evidence Defendants’ Exhibit 35. I think I already introduced it. And I also introduce in evidence Defendants’ Exhibit 36. (“ Defendants’ Exhibit 36” was received in evi dence.) The Court: We will take a recess of ten minutes. (Short recess.) 272 The Court: Be seated. You may proceed. Mr. McGregor: Have I shown Your Honor Exhibit 36? The Court: Yes, I saw it. Q. This is Exhibit 36 which I have introduced in evidence. Does that represent the specifications of the table which is illustrated in Defendants’ Exhibit 35? A. Yes, it does. It is the specification for table No. G-523. Q. And that illustrates what this table is made out of. That is to say, whether it is wood or steel? A. Yes, it does. Q. And what is it made out of? A. It is made out of wood with—well, the order is for two tables. Each table is 12 feet long and 3 feet wide and 2 feet 7 inches high. Each table has a 1-5/8 inch thick carbonized birchwood top, four steel spring rods in top— Q. What are the four steel rods for? A. They are to hold the laminated wood tops to gether. Q. All right, go ahead. A. One stone sink, 18 by 12 by 6 inches deep. Two single water cocks, two double gas cocks, 12 drawers, 14 by 16 inches and 4 inches deep. Two drawers 17-3/4 by 9 inches and 4 inches deep. Eight aluminum leg shoes. One lead trap assembly for each sink, and 273 the tables are built of select plain white oak and fin ished in school brown. Q. Now, Mr. Lemmons, on that Defendants’ Ex hibit No. 35 would you mark with the letter A, using it twice, the water cocks? A. All right. Q. Would you use the letter B, using it twice, and mark the two double gas cocks? A. Yes. Q. Would you mark one of the drawers with the letter C? A. All right. Q. Would you mark the aluminum leg shoes, one of them only, with the letter D? A. Yes. Q. And mark the lead trap assembly with the letter E. A. All right. Q. Have you so marked Defendants’ Exhibit 35? A. I have. Mr. McGregor: I reintroduce it with the markings on it. Q. I hand you Plaintiff’ s Exhibit 19, which I believe has been identified a number of times as the chem istry room in the Randolph School, and ask you if the tables reflected by the specifications and the blue print of Defendants’ Exhibits 35 and 36 are to be placed in that room? A. They are. Q. It has been testified that presently there are no water connections or gas connections in that room. Is that correct? A. That is correct. 274 Q. When those tables are received will the gas and water connections be put in? A. They will. Q. I will ask you when you placed the order did you have any assurance as to when the tables would be received? A. The order was placed, as I recall, about the fifteenth or seventeenth day of last August and the tables were to be delivered within 45 days. Q. Have you made any effort to ascertain why they have not been delivered? A. Yes, I have. Q. Have you received any information as to when they probably will be delivered? A. I received information that they would prob ably be delivered during the month of December. Q. I see. Have you as yet received them? A. I had not when I left LaGrange Monday morn ing. Q. Is it an article that you can go into the open market and purchase? A. It is not. Q. I hand you, Mr. Lemmons, Plaintiff’s Exhibit 18 and ask you what that is? A. That is the chemistry laboratory or the science laboratory rather, in the white school building. Q. Are there tables reflected in that picture? A, There are. Q. Do you know how old those tables are? A. I believe those tables were bought in 1923 or 1924. Q. The tables that are reflected by Defendants’ Exhibit 35 and 36, how do they compare as to whether or not they are of more recent and accepted design? 275 A. I believe the tables on Defendants’ Exhibit 35 are more practical and more useful than these older tables on Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 18. Q. How many tables do you have for the science department, science laboratory there in the white high school? A. We have four. Q. Have you ordered any additional? A. No, I have not. Q. How many will this give you at the Randolph School? A. Two. Q. How many students are taking chemistry at the white school? A. May I refer to my notes? Q. Yes, sir. A. There are 25. Q. Twenty-five? A. Yes, sir. Q. And I believe you stated there are 16 at the Randolph School? A. Yes, sir. Q. I hand you herewith Defendants’ Exhibit 32 and ask you if you recognize that as the ground plan of the Randolph School? The Court: As the what? Q. Ground plan? A. Yes, it is. Mr. McGregor: I introduce this Exhibit 32 in evidence. 276 ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 32” was received in evi dence.) Q. To the left of that Defendants’ Exhibit 32 I see a large square area which has the word “ Gymnasi um ” in the center of it. Is that where the gymnasium is at the Randolph School? A. Yes, it is. Q. And within that large area is a smaller square area bounded by lighter lines. What does that repre sent? A. That represents the wooden floor for the basket ball court in the gymnasium. Q. Outside of those lighter lines and between them and the heavier black lines, what is that? A. That is a concrete floor. Q. And is that true on each side? A. Yes, it is. Q. And is that true on this end? A. No. The wooden floor extends to the end. Q. To that extent then this line here is in error? A. Yes, and the front line is also in error to the same extent. Q. Does the wooden floor in this gymnasium area or the basket ball area extend all the way to the stage? A. It does. Q. In the area, in the middle left hand side, facing the picture, there are black lines coming down to a heavy partition, I mean, to the end, on the left hand side of that building. What is that area between those lines ? A. It is a kitchen room in the gymnasium. Q. And to the rear on the left side and the right side of the gymnasuim area are some rooms parti tioned off. What is in those rooms? 277 A. Those are dressing rooms. They are equipped with showers, hot and cold water showers, lavatories and commodes. Q. Now at the opening to the— The Court: In that gymnasuim, I understand it is on a concrete slab. Is that right? A. Yes, it is. The Court: So that wooden floor is made on the concrete slab? A. Yes, Your Honor. The Court: On top of it? A. Yes. It is recessed into the concrete slab and the finished floor, of course, is level with the other concrete slab. The Court: Yes. Q. Now to the front I see what appears to be an entranceway between some classrooms and the gym nasuim. Is that an entranceway into the school? A. Yes. It is one of the entrances. Q. Is that particular entrance reflected in this el evation at this point? A. Yes, it is. Q. That is Defendants’ Exhibit 1 which I am point ing to. Now I see over on the other side of the front 278 of the school what appears to be another entrance way. Is that an entranceway? A. Yes, it is. Q. Is that reflected on the face of the elevation of Defendants’ Exhibit 2, at this point? A. Yes, it is. Q. Over both of those areaways the roof struc ture of the entire building passes, does it not? A. Yes, sir. Q. I see a shaded area behind what appears to be the four classrooms proceeding from east to west in this direction, and I ask you what that area is? A. It is a covered walkway and has a concrete walk or floor and the roof of the classrooms extends over it. Q. Is that concrete on the same level with the floor of the classrooms that are in the four drawings that are in front of you? A. Yes, it is. Q. Is the entranceway concrete? A. Yes. Q. Is it on a level with the classroom floor? A. It is. Q. And is the entranceway on the left likewise on a level with the classroom floor? A. Yes, it is. Q. Now inside the picture is an areaway that is labeled “ patio.” I will ask you if that areaway is covered in any way? A. No, it is not. Q. That area has no roof over it? A. No. Q. That light looking passage up through here, is it similar to this passage? A. Yes, it is. 279 Q. Does it have a roof over it? A. It does. Q. By the way, Mr. Lemmons, when you reach the point at this side of the patio, proceeding to the end of this building, do you go through doors here? A. Yes, you do. Q. And is this portion of that corridor enclosed? A. It is. Q. Is there a door when you leave this entrance way to proceed on out through this passage? A. There is. Q. And is that true on the left hand side of the picture as well? A. Yes, it is. Q. I see in each of the front classrooms what ap pears to be an opening onto the inside corridor at the rear and ask you if those are the openings into the corridor? A. They are the openings from the classrooms into the corridor. Q. Now those rooms that I now point to in the middle of the two ells that proceed back, this room, this room, and this room, all open, do they not, into the enclosed areaway abutting the center portion of the ell? A. Two of them do. Q. Which two? A. This room and this one. This room opens just outside of the door which goes into the closed pas sageway. Q. I see. Then the patio where these three open corridors are situated is bounded on all sides by the completely constructed unit, is it not? A. It is. 280 Q. It is not open in any way then, to the wind, except that this passageway proceeding to the east is fully open and this passageway, after it passes this structure, is fully open. That is correct, isn’t it? A. Yes, it is. Q. Now, if you leave the series of rooms that join the two ells and proceed on to the rear, is this outside corridor covered with a roof? A. It is. Q. And is this outside corridor covered with a roof? A. It is. The Court: Is that the old part of the building? A. Yes, Your Honor. Q. Now, there have been— The Court: Was the roof there before these new improve ments or was it put there during the new improve ments ? A. No, it has been there— The Court: All the time? A. Yes, sir. Q. By the way, I don’t recall whether I asked you or not, but can you tell us about when the old portion of this Randolph School was constructed? A. That was built by the WPA or PWA project back in between 1934 and 1936. 281 Q. The exact year you are unable to state? A. No, I cannot state at this time the exact year. Q. Now at the end of each of the parallel wings of the older portion of the building I see a smaller room. What are those rooms used for A. Those are restrooms for the boys on the left and the girls on the right. Q. I see. The Court: Those restrooms, as I understand it, are just for the old portion or do they serve the whole building? A. They serve the whole building. The Court: The whole building. And the entrance to them is from the outside covered walk? A. Yes, sir, that is correct. The Court: “ Walks” is not the word. Mr. McGregor: “ Outside corridors” is the technical expression, Your Honor. Q. There is also, in addition to these particular restrooms, these restrooms at the back of the gym which are available to the students, are there not? A. Yes, there are. The Court: They can be reached from the gym? 282 A. Yes. They can be reached from the gym or from exterior doors leading from the playground. Q. In other words, if the children are outside, they can come in here without going all the way through here? A. Yes. Q. Now, Mr. Lemmons, I will ask you what age children are taught in the lower grades of the La Grange Independent School District? A. How many of the lower grades do you refer to? Q. Well, what do you call the lower grades? A. Well, the first eight grades are the elementary grades. Q. You call those the elementary grades? A. Yes, sir. The first grade children range be tween the ages of 6 and 7, and the eighth grade chil dren range between the ages of 13 and 15. Q. Is there any material difference in the average age in the colored students and the white students? A. Very little. Q. Very little. They are well nigh of equal age so far as their school attendance is concerned, in years? A. Yes. Q. What is the average age of the students that attend the high school portion of the LaGrange Inde pendent School District? A. From 14 to 18 years old. Some of them are 19, but that is the general—- Q. Very rarely you ever have any over 19, I pre sume? A. Yes, sir, that is correct. Q. Do you know whether or not you have now any over the age of 19? 283 A. I don’t recall. I don’t believe I do. Q. The State of Texas has a compulsory law in reference to children going to school, doesn’t it? A. Yes, it does. Q. And do you know of your own knowledge what that present age limit it? A. No, I don’t. I believe it is from — Q. That is all right. If you don’t know, you don’t know. Now so far as the entrance requirements in your primary school, is that requirement uniform in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Yes, it is. Q. Now so far as your entrance requirements are concerned in your high school section in the La- Grange Independent School District, is that require ment uniform? A. It is. Q. So far as the system of classroom teaching is concerned in the primary schools, is that uniform in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. Generally, yes. Q. System, I am talking about? A. Yes, generally, yes. Q. So far as the teaching is concerned in the high school portion of the LaGrange Independent School District, is that system uniform? A. Yes. Q. So far as the examination system, that is the requirements as to what examinations shall be given, the weight that is to be given to them and the usual things that the educator regards as of value in an examination system, is that uniform in those elemen tary and high school sections in the LaGrange Inde pendent School District? A. Yes. The system is uniform throughout. 284 Q. And the requirements are the same through out? A. They are. Q. Are the requirements for graduation, that is, as to number of credits, hours of study, hours of recitation and so forth, uniform throughout the La- Grange Independent School District, both as to the elementary and as to the high school? A. They are. Q. As to the text books used by the students in the elementary school and the high school, through out the entire LaGrange Independent School District, are they uniform? A. They are. Q. And the same text books that are used in one school are used in another, where appropriate? A. Yes. They are furnished by the State of Texas. Q. And you follow the requirements and the rules and regulations of the state in reference to the sup plying of those text books? A. We do. Q. And you have done that uniformly throughout the district? A. Yes. Q. How many teachers do you have at the present time in the Randolph School of the LaGrange Inde pendent School District? A. Eighteen. Q. Are there requirements of the State of Texas in reference to the qualifications of teachers to teach in the respective public school systems of the state? A. There are. Q. In the selection of teachers in the Randolph School in the LaGrange Independent School District, speaking now of the combined school, have those requirements been observed? 285 A. They have. Q. Have they been applied uniformly as they have in the white schools of the district? A. Yes, they have. Q. I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, how do the quali fications, as far as certification is concerned, of the teachers now being employed by the LaGrange In dependent School District in the Randolph School compare with the qualifications of the teachers now teaching in the white schools of the district? A. The training of the teachers in the Randolph School averages a fraction more than the training of the teachers in the white schools. The Court: What do you mean by training? A. I mean by taking the number of years which they have attended college and striking the average from the number of years of attending college in the Randolph School, the sum total of the years the teachers in the white school have earned in college work. The Court: You mean it is greater in the negro school? A. Yes, by a small fraction. The Court: Who selects the teachers? A. The teachers are selected—first, they are ap proved by the principals of the various schools and then they are approved by me, and then they are officially employed by the Board of Education, the School Board. 286 Q. In other words, to teach in the Randolph School the teacher first must have the approval of the princi pal in that school? A. Yes, sir. The Court: And then he comes to you and then he goes to the Board? A. Yes, sir. That is a general policy of the system. The Court: Well, is that carried out in such a way that the principal has a voice in the selection of these tea chers? A. Yes. He has a voice in the selection of these teachers because he works with them and he knows the assignments to which they are going to be as signed. The Court: I see. Q. Now I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, if at the pre sent time the prescribed curriculum for both elemen tary and high school portions of the Randolph School as prescribed by the State of Texas as being required is being taught in that school? A. Yes, it is. Q. So far as the Randolph School is concerned, as compared with the other white schools in the La- Grange Independent School District, can you tell me, first, how many students per teacher does the Ran dolph School have? A. I don’t have those figures. 287 Q. Well, during the lunch hour will you please make that up. Now, on your direct examination, Mr. Lemmons, you were asked where the food was cooked that was served at the Randolph School. Would you state that for the Court again, please? A. The food is cooked in the cafeteria at the Hermes White Elementary building. Q. Where is the lunchroom used by the students at the old white high school and the Hermes School located? A. It is located—well, it is a part of the Hermes Elementary School building. Q. In other words, both the students at the old high school and the students at the Hermes School eat at the same place, the high school students walking over? A. They do. Q. By the way, before the erection of the Hermes Building where were the elementary students taught? A. In the old, in the building that is now being used for the high school. Q. In other words, you had both high school and elementary in the same building? A. Yes, we did. Q. Now at the time that the food is prepared, how is it ascertained how much food should be taken to the Randolph School? A. Between the hours or the time of 8:45 and 9:30 in the morning each teacher determines the number of children who are in her classroom who are going to take lunch at the cafeteria. That is throughout the whole system. That information is phoned to my of fice and my secretary takes it to the chief cook in charge of the lunchroom. Then he prepares his meals according to or based on that information. 288 Q. Now what has been the experience as to the average number of students and teachers that have been eating at the Randolph School cafeteria? A. During the last month 43 children ate at the Randolph School. That is average of 43 throughout the month. Q. Does that reflect the number of meals pre pared and served over there or does it reflect the number of children that ate? A. That reflects the number of children that ate. Q. If some of the faculty members ate there would be an additional figure? A. There would be. Q. During that month does it reflect that any of the faculty ate there? A. Yes, it does. Q. What is the average daily number of the facul ty that eat there? A. I don’t have those figures but they average, as I recall, five or six of them eat there daily. Q. I see. Now in that particular kitchen at the Ran dolph School the food can be prepared there and served there, can it not? A. It could be. Q. You have in that kitchen, according to these exhibits that have been introduced here, a stove and an ice box and a deepfreeze, sink, dish rack and other equipment, don’t you? A. Yes, that is true. Q. Why is it that you have deemed it expedient to prepare the food at the Hermes School and take it to the Randolph School? A. Because we believe that we can save on the cost, the unit cost of preparing each meal in a central kitchen and carrying it out to the various schools for 289 serving. That procedure has been approved by the Lunchroom Division of the State Department of Edu cation. Q. In other words, that procedure you are using here, at the Hermes and Randolph Schools, is that you have established a central kitchen which has been approved by the State authorities for the prepa ration of food and then taking it to the schools? A. It is. Q. It is. Now then, the stove that you use at the Randolph School is for what purpose? A. For warming the food. Q. In other words, keeping it warm until it is served. A. Yes. The Court: How long before the food is served does it leave the place that it is prepared? A. They begin serving as soon as the food arrives at the school. They leave the kitchen between 11:30 and 11:45 and they start serving immediately, as soon as the food arrives at Randolph. The Court: Well,how long does it take to get it over there? A. Well, I would say ten minutes. It is only half to three-quarters of a mile. The Court: How is it protected between places? 290 A. It is placed in aluminum containers of the type that the Army used, closed containers, and carried over there. The Court: Well, is it hot or cold when you start out with it? A. It is hot. The Court: And I guess in the summertime, why, it doesn’t get very cold going over, does it? A. No, sir. The Court: In the wintertime if it does get cold, why you put it on the stove at the Randolph School. Is that the idea? A. Yes, sir. Q. Is that about the way they serve the white people? About the same time? A. Yes. They start about the same time. The Court: Gentlemen, I missed my Rotary attendance last week and I want to make it up today. I think it will be nec essary for me to leave in about five minutes from now to get out there, so with your permission I am going to recess Court until 2:00 o ’clock. (Recessed at 11:40 a. m.) Afternoon Session, 2:00 P. M. The Court: Be seated. You may proceed. 291 Mr. Durham: If it please Your Honor, the photographer, Mr. Hickman, I talked with Mr. McGregor and I do not think we will use him any more and we wanted to ask the Court to excuse him. The Court: He may be excused. Mr. McGregor: May it please the Court, I told the Court this morn ing I would ask a technical witness to be here at 2:00 o’clock and in the absence of objections from counsel I would like to use him now so he may be excused, if the Court will let me interrupt my examination of Mr. Lemmons. The Court: That is all right. HUGH E. GREGG, was called as a witness in be half of the defendants and, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. Please state your name to the Court. A. Hugh E. Gregg. Q. Where do you reside, Mr. Gregg? A. Milcombe Boulevard, Houston. Q. How long have you lived in Houston, Texas? A. I came here in 1938. 292 The Court: Speak out a little louder, please, sir, Q. Where were you born and raised, Mr. Gregg? A. In Dallas. Q. What is your profession? A. I am an architect. Q. Where did you receive your education? A. At Rice Institute. Q. Did you go to any other schools or colleges? A. John Tarlton. Q. Where is that? A. Stephensville. Q. Did you get a degree from that school as well? A. It is Junior College. Q. Are you licensed to practice architecture in Texas? A. Yes, sir. Q. Do you hold a license of any other kind from the state or Government or any other organization? A. No, sir. Q. Are you a member of any national association of architects? A. American Institute of Architects, Texas Society of Architects. Q. How long have you been actively practicing architecture? A. I had my license to practice architecture just about a year ago. Q. Just about a year. With whom are you asso ciated? A. Stayton Nunn. Q. And is Mr. Nunn an architect? A. Yes, sir. Q. And where is his place of business? A. 2425 Ralph Street. 293 Q. In the City of Houston? A. Yes, sir. Q. I will ask you, Mr. Gregg, if Mr. Nunn is the architect for the Houston Independent School Dis trict? A. He is co-ordinating architect for the Houston Independent School District. Q. What do you mean by co-ordinating architect? A. He handles all of the schools boards’ architec tural work. Instead of having—say we have 50 dif ferent school projects going on, instead of having 50 architects come to the School Board with their prob lems, they go to Mr. Nunn. He starts out by making a schematic layout for a school job and turns that over to the project architect, and the project archi tect takes that schematic layout and will make work ing drawings from that. Q. How long have you been working for Mr. Nunn? A. A little over two years. Q. And when did you finish Rice Institute? A. I got my first degree in 1941. Q. Then where did you go? A. I had two more years at Rice, got a B. S. and Master’s. Q. Then what did you do? A. Went to work for Wilson, Morris and Crain. Q. Are they architects? A. Yes, sir,. Before that I was in the Navy. Q. How long were you in the Navy? A. Four years. Q. And you came back here in 1946? A. Yes, sir. Q. And who did you go to work for in 1946? A. Wilson, Morris and Crain. Q. And you stated that you stayed with them until a little over a year ago? 294 A. I was with them until a little over two years ago. Q. Now in the course of your work there with Mr. Nunn, have you had under your supervision and as a part of your work, planning of the schools here in the Independent School District of Houston, Texas? A. Yes, sir. Q. I will ask you, Mr. Gregg, if you are familiar with what is known as the open corridor? A. Yes, sir. Q. And I will ask you if within the course of your work over the past two years you have designed any such open corridors? A. Yes, sir. Q. I will ask you if in this particular locality cov ered by the Houston Independent School District are there any schools which have what is known as the open corridor? A. Yes, sir, there are 12. Q. There are 12? A. Yes, sir. We have 12 we are working on now. Q. That you yourself have actually worked on? A. Yes, sir. Q. Can you describe for the Court generally what is the scheme used in the construction of the open corridor in the public schools. General scheme I am asking for. A. Well, where you have a covered, a roofed over passage on the side of your classrooms which you use for going from classroom to classroom where one side is closed by the wall of the classroom and the other side is open to the exterior. Q. Is that a new method of constructing schools in so far as the trade is concerned in the building of schools? A. No, sir. 295 Q. How many years would you say it had actually been in use? A. The particular school in Houston here, East- wood Elementary School, it is 15 years old or more. Q. You have actually seen that school yourself? A. Yes, sir. Q. Are there any other older schools here in this community that have the outside corridor? A. I believe Montrose Elementary School. Q. And you say at the present time you have some 12 schools under construction here or which have been finished that have the outside corridor? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now— A. I have a list here of them. Would you like the names of them? Q. Did you bring a list of them from your office? A. Yes, sir. Q. Read off those in the district. A. New schools, Oak Forest Elementary, Berry Elementary School. Oak Forest is being occupied, Berry is under construction. Horn Elementary School is occupied. Aldine Westfield is under construction. San Felipe Post Oak School is under construc tion. Braes Height School is under construction. Then there is Wesleyan Road. Eastwood is a school that is being rehabilitated and added to. 296 Trinity Gardens is a new school. Garden Oaks is an old school that there are some additions being made to. Curry Road Area School is in the planning stage. South Park Addition School is in the planning stage. Q. You have actually been to the sites of all those that are finished or are under construction? A. Yes, sir. Q. By the way, Mr. Gregg, are there certain trade journals in use in the architectural trade showing de velopments and applications of procedures to which your concern subscribes? A. Yes, sir. Q. I will ask you if the trade journal is known as Progessive Architecture is commonly accepted in the trade and if from such journal ideas and other adaptable suggestions are utilized by the trade from that? A. Yes, sir. Q. I asked you to bring an issue of that. This is the issue of April, 1949, and I ask you if it has a design of the open corridor school in it which you can illus trate your testimony with? A. Yes. There is one right here. Q. And would you tell me what page that design is on, Mr. Gregg? A. Page 54. Q. Now are you able to illustrate your testimony from that design? A. Yes, sir, It is— 297 Mr. McGregor: Just a moment. At this time I would like to intro duce the design for the purpose of enabling the wit ness to illustrate his testimony in reference to the construction of the open corridor school. The Court: All right. Have it marked. (The design was marked as “ Defendants’ Exhibit 37” for identification.) Q. I now hand you what has become Defendants’ Exhibit 37— Mr. McGregor: I am introducing it. Of course, only this design and what is there is all that I am introducing, not the reading. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 37” was received in evi dence.) Q. Would you take a pencil, please, and explain to the Court the layout there, where the walls are solid, where there are doors and where the outlets are and the general condition there in that particular open corridor school? A. Here you have what they call a covered corri dor. That is, roofed over. You have walls on this side of the classrooms and windows on this side. This is all open through here where you have, you just have what they call a covered corridor. Q. Where are the toilets? A. The toilets are at this end and here, girls and boys toilets. 298 Q. Now at my request you brought a June, 1949, issue of Progressive Architecture and I ask that this now be marked. (The instrument was marked as “ Defendants’ Ex hibit 38,” for identification.) Q. I ask you if this is another design indicating the type of construction of the open corridor type school? A. Yes, it is. Here is— Q. Just a moment. Would you be aided in illus trating the type of design it is by looking at that design? A. Yes, sir. Mr. McGregor: I will introduce the Exhibit 38 then in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 38” was received in evi dence.) Q. Now will you tell the Court what that particular type of design shows, just as you did on Exhibit 37? A. Covered passage down this side of the build ing, doors into the classroom here, windows down this side. Toilets at the end here. In this particular one you will notice it says: “ Mention: Class 1.” It won a prize— Q. I don’t know whether they might object to that or not. Now then, this type of school, is that the type as is shown on Exhibit 38, of any of those that you are constructing in the Houston Independent School Dis trict? A. Yes, sir. Q. Is also the type that is refused in Exhibit 37 the type that is being constructed here. I mean by that, 299 are there, upon occasion, variations put into the de sign? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now, Mr. Gregg, you have been born and raised in Texas and as an architect I will ask you if you can tell me what portions of the State of Texas you think might be suitable for this type of open corridor school construction? A. I believe that most anywhere except possibly in the Panhandle, getting north, where you have se vere cold. It could adapt itself very well. Q. Other than in the Panhandle? A. Yes, sir. Q. I will ask you, Mr. Gregg, if one of the accepted trade journals in the architectural profession is the Architectural Forum? A. Yes, sir. Q. Is it used and resorted to by the architects in their regular course of daily business in the expansion of their ideas and for the procurement of ideas and extension of their own ideas? A. Yes, sir. Q. I will ask you to turn to page 106 of the Octo ber, 1949, issue. (The instrument was marked as “ Defendants’ Ex hibit 39,” for identification.) Q. I show you what has been marked as Exhibit 39 and referring only to the picture I ask you if that picture is an illustration of the open corridor type school construction? A. Yes, sir. Q. And I will ask you if in that particular illus tration the school buildings completely surround the grounds? 300 A. Yes, sir. Q. And what would you call that area in the center here? Would there be any particular name for it? A. Court. Q. Or any other similar name? A. Yes. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Exhibit 39 in evidence. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 39” was received in evi dence.) Q. Now, Mr. Gregg, there are many was to— Mr. Durham: Your Honor, I wou’t object to it if it is introduced for a limited purpose. I don’t know— The Court: I understood it is limited to the purpose of aiding the witness in illustrating his testimony. Mr. Durham: The other was, but in the introduction of this it was not so limited. Mr. McGregor: I thought I limited it, but if I did not, I meant to. (An instrument was marked as “ Defendants’ Ex hibit 40,” for identification.) 301 Q. Now from the same trade journal, Architectural Forum, I exhibit to you Defendants’ Exhibit 40 and with that before you I will ask you, Mr. Gregg, if there are not many ways that this type open corridor school may be constructed? A. Yes, sir. Q. Yes. Defendants’ Exhibit 40 has No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and Defendants’ Exhibit 40 is only for the pur pose of illustration. Describe to the Court the differ ent methods of constructing the open corridor school? A. Well, in No. 1 you have what you call here the finger plan, where you have line-ups of buildings with the corridor down one side, covered passage, with the classrooms on the other. In No. 2 you have here what you call a double load ed corridor where you have classrooms on both sides. In No. 3 it is a similar situation where you have a double loaded corridor, classrooms on both sides but it is varying here. And in No. 4 it is rather an experimental thing where he is experimenting with a round type school with the corridors around a central auditorium. No. 5 is again a variation of the single type where you have a covered passage serving classrooms off to the side. Q. Do any one of those, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, illus trate the type that has been adopted in this com munity ? A. I think you can find examples of all, possibly except No. 4 here. Q. You can find examples of all of them except No. 4. When you say No. 4, you mean No. 4 within Exhibit 40? A. Yes, sir. 302 Mr. McGregor: I now introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 40. The Court: For the same purpose? Mr. McGregor: For the same purpose, to illustrate. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 40” was received in evi dence.) Q. Mr. Gregg, I hand you here Defendants’ Ex hibit 32, which is already in evidence and which pur ports to be a ground plan of the school that is illustra ted by Defendants’ Exhibit 1 on this elevation. I show you here what has been testified to as being a gym nasium and a covered corridor through here, this being the entrance of Defendants’ Exhibit 1 where the small figure and the large figure are coming out, the balance of this area being covered by the open corridor proceeding on across. Also, the entrance here which is shown on Defendants’ Exhibit 1 and this opening here. Then the parallel corridor like lines being the covered or outside corridor proceeding back adjacent to each of the buildings represented by the eaves of the roof which you see projecting over the elevation. I will ask you if, in your experience and in your judgment as an architect, if that is represen tative of a typical open corridor type school? A. It is. Q. You will see in the center of that drawing a space marked “ patio.” I will ask you if that would indicate, if that would be an area comparable to the type area illustrated in Defendants’ Exhibit 39? A. Yes. 303 Q. I am not asking you, of course, if it is exactly the same size or the same width, height and so forth. Now it has been testified here that in this area at the back of this long ell and at this area here at the back of this long ell are the toilets respectively for the girls and the boys. I will ask you whether or not you are able to state from your experience as an archi tect whether or not that is common and accepted practice as to the placing of toilets in that type of open corridor school? A. Yes, sir. Q. And I will ask you if, in your judgment, it is desirable that they be so placed at the ends of the ells? A. Yes, sir. Q. In each of those illustrations that were put in evidence to illustrate your testimony were the toilets in those respective illustrations entered from the cov ered walkways? A. Yes, sir. Q. And from the predicate that I have shown here, that these are covered walkways, the same situation would exist here, would it not? A. Yes, sir. Mr. McGregor: That is all. No further questions. The Court: You may cross examine him. Cross Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. Mr. Gregg, I believe each of the exhibits that have been introduced in evidence by the defendants 304 in the trade journals, Exhibits Nos. 37, 38, 39 and 40, showing the buildings and figures which you have tes tified about, are constructions shown to be in the State of California? A. I believe that is right. Q. I believe you stated that in your opinion that this open corridor type building was as substantial as the enclosed corridor provided the weather was fair? A. I don’t believe I used the word “ substantial.” Q. Well, what did you use. Maybe I misunderstood you. Mr. McGregor: Well, I think I will object to that as calling on the witness to speculate as to what he said without any predicate being laid in any question as to what he may have said. The Court: Well, the witness said he didn’t say what counsel suggested he said. If he can remember, he can an swer it. A. I am sorry. I don’t remember exactly the word that I used. I don’t think I said “ substantial.” Q. Well, I will ask you if you did not say, in re sponse to a question from Mr. McGregor, that you felt that where the weather was favorable that these open corridors were as good as the enclosed corri dors? A. Well, I believe I—if you would ask me, I would say I think they are better. Q. You think they are better. All right. Now, with regard to Defendants’ Exhibit No. 37. The figure that 305 you were testifying about on direct examination has nothing to prevent water, during a rain or blowing rain, from coming upon the walk under the shelter of the corridor? A. That is right. Q. There is nothing to prevent snow if it is in the area where they have snow occasionally from coming up on the walk? A. That is right. Q. Would you consider that type of corridor in a section where they have frequent rain, snow occa sionally, to be as safe for school children to pass over as a corridor which is enclosed which prevents rain and snow from accumulating there? A. I believe I said that we were doing quite a bit of that in Houston and certainly we have quite a bit of rain here and occasionally snow. There just haven’t been complaints about it at all. Q. Thank you. Now will you answer my question. In your opinion would you say that you consider it as safe for school children, in an elementary school, passing over that corridor during the condition of weather such as I have described to you? A. Well, tell me again now. Let me ask you a question. Q. I will be glad to. Yes, sir. You may ask me if the Court permits. A. Now I want you to ask me the question again. Q. I believe you testified that there is nothing to prevent rain, if there is rain, blowing rain, from getting upon the walk where the children must pass in the open corridor from one classroom to another? A. You have a considerable overhang. You have your roof there. Q. Well, aside from the roof? A. No, it is open on the side. 306 Q. And likewise it has nothing to prevent snow from driving or blowing upon the walk? A. That is right. Q. Now in your opinion as an expert, where an open corridor is in a position to have water, snow to accumulate upon it and children passing over it from one classroom to another, would you in your opinion as an expert consider that corridor as safe as an enclosed corridor? A. If the conditions were as you stated, if you had snow and rain there, I would not think so. Q. Now, each of the figures that you testified about are outside corridors, aren’t they, Mr. Gregg? A. Yes, sir. Q. How many schools have you planned, super vised or aided in planning and supervising with an open corridor in a building such as counsel has de tailed to you on figure 1, this instrument here which has been introduced as Defendants’ Exhibit No. 1? A. How many schools have I— Q. Planned, drawn a figure for or aided in draw ing where the corridor in that building which you drew was similar to the corridor in this building? A. Oh, you mean a covered passage? Q. No, I was asking about this building. A. Well, that is what you are talking about in this building, a covered passage. Q. No. I am afraid I might be misleading you. It has been testified here that there are four rooms across here and the front of this building here it has ben testified is a gymnasium? A. Yes. Q. That there were old buildings behind here, this new structure, and that a corridor, an open cor ridor was built between these buildings up against 307 that old portion of the building which was then stand ing. Now, how many school plans or drawings, ar chitectural drawings, have you drawn or participated in drawing of a similar nature to the one here. Give those facts. A. Where I have added on to an existing school building with an open type corridor? Eastwood Ele mentary School. Q. Now what type of building was it in the back? A. I beg your pardon? Q. The original construction at Eastwood School? A. It is a masonry building. Q. All right. Now in the Eastwood building are the students compelled to go out of the classroom to reach the next classroom? A. Yes. Q. Is there any heat in there? A. In the classroom? Q. Yes. A. In the classroom? Q. In the restrooms and classrooms or between the classrooms? A. No, sir. Q. Is that a high school or elementary school? A. Elementary school. Q- How many combinations of high school and elementary schools have you drawn plans for or aided in the drawing of plans where there was an elementary and high school combined with open cor ridor? A. I may be mistaken but I don’t believe that this district has that type combination. Q- I will ask you if it is not true, Mr. Gregg, that the open type corridor is usually used for smaller children, getting exercise, and in climates where it is tropical or semi-tropical? 308 A. Well, I don’t get your connection between small children and climate. Q. I am talking about where they are of a tender age and in such a part of the country where the climate is tropical or semi-tropical? Mr McGregor: I think there are two questions in one there and I object to it. It is misleading to the witness to com bine the age of the children and the climate to gether. It seems to me it is confusing. The Court: He may answer if he can. I don’t know whether he can or not. A. I think that the governing thing there is the size of the building. You have several elementary schools to one high school. Well now, if you were to take a high school which required a larger number of rooms and put it out on an open corridor basis, then you have to string it considerably all over the country, where you can get by with a smaller number of rooms with an elementary school. I don’t think that the age of the children has anything to do with the idea that it is an open corridor school or whether it is not an open corridor school. I think it is the size of the building required. See, where you have several elementary schools serving the feed into one high school; you have an area where you have eight elementary schools and the children may leave that elementary school and go to one high school. That one high school has to be big enough to absorb all the children from the eight elementary schools. So, in turn, it has to be a much bigger building and for it 309 not to be a double loaded corridor or, rather, to be a double loaded corridor, it would be too big a build ing to have open type corridors. Q. Now have you, since you have been engaged in your profession, ever aided or ever drawn an open corridor sketch for a high school? A. No. Q. I believe you said in the open corridors you have heat in the rooms? A. Yes. Q. And the students passing out into an open corri dor where it is cold and the heat has been brought up to a certain temperature in the room, does that cause the temperature to drop in the classroom? A. Well, naturally. Q. In the— A. Wait a minute. Q. Oh, pardon me. A. You mean by having a door open out into the corridor? Q. Yes, sir. A. Well, yes. You load your heating more if you have a heating element that is capable of taking care of that. Q. What kind of heating element would you use to hold the temperature at the same level with the door open? A. They have, well, they have space heaters and radiators and things that are controlled by thermo stat, and when the temperature drops to a certain minimum it throws on the heat. Q. But that doesn’t hold it at the same level, does it? A. No, no. 310 Q. I don’t believe we have invented any instru ment yet— A. No. Q. —that will hold the temperature in the room at the same level in cold weather with the door open? A. No. Q. Do you think the change of temperature for children moving from one room to another suddenly with the door open will harm the child? A. I would think so, although I would like to qual ify that if I may. I have already stated that our cli mate lends itself to this type of building and the occasion for cold weather is insignificant enough, I believe, that it is better, that the open corridor gives you a better building. Q. You are speaking of Houston, aren’t you? A. Yes, sir. Q. What about LaGrange? A. Well, it is close enough. I would consider that. Q. Does it snow in LaGrange? A. I believe it does. It snows in Houston. Q. Mr. Gregg, in your opinion as an expert, a child leaving a room that had been heated to a certain temperature, the room was warm, would leave that room and go out into an open corridor without his wrap on, passing from one classroom to another, do you think it might affect that child? A. I believe—why wouldn’t he have his wrap on? Q. If he was required to get his wrap and put it on and take it in the other room and unwrap would that, in your opinion, consume some time? A. Well— Mr. McGregor: I object to that. Mr. Gregg has only been qualified as an architect and he is not presented here to testify 311 as to any physical or other happenings to children that might affect their health. The Court: I don’t believe it is improper cross examination. Objection overruled. Q. Will you answer the question? A. Would you mind repeating it? (Question read.) A. I don’t believe so. Q. You think it would not hurt a child to go out in the open from a warm room in cold weather with out a wrap? A. No, I said—I understood your question to be, would it take some time for him to get his wrap. Q. Oh. Assuming a child was leaving a classroom such as you have described without his wrap and it was cold on the outside and he would pass out in the cold without his wrap into the next classroom, do you think that would affect the child? A. It might. Mr. Durham: That is all, Your Honor. Re-Direct Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. Mr. Gregg, you have stated that you have not designed the open corridor plan high school. Presum ing that you had anywhere up to 50 or 200 students for a high school, reducing the matter to a size below that which would be bulky for the plan as you sug 312 gested, would there be any reason why the open corridor plan would not be just as adaptable to the high school as to the grade school? A. No. Mr. McGregor: That is all. The Court: Are you through with Mr. Gregg? Mr. Durham: That is all, Your Honor. Mr. McGregor: That is all, sir. The Court: You may be excused. C. A. LEMMONS, resumed the stand and testified as follows: Cross Examination (Continued). By Mr. McGregor: Q. Mr. Lemmons, this is Exhibit 32 I am showing you. On that exhibit these rooms across here are for the primary students? A. Yes, they are. Those are the new rooms. Q. Do those children change rooms or stay in the same room all day? A. They stay in the same room all day except, of course, for lunch and recess. 313 Q, Now you testified this morning, as I recall, that you had one other school plant in the district known as War da? A. Yes, I did. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 29 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph of the front of the Warda Elementary School and it is a true representation of it. The Court: Have you seen these pictures? Mr. Durham: We have not, Your Honor. I don’t know. Have we? Mr. McGregor: Oh, yes, Mr. Durham. You saw them this morning. Mr. Durham: Oh, yes, we have seen them, Your Honor. The Court: All right. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 30 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph of the side of the white elementary school building. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 28 and ask you what that is? A. This is a photograph of the other side of the white elementary school. Q. And I hand you Exhibit 27 and ask you what that is? 314 A. This is a photograph of the rear or the back of the Warda Elementary School. The Court: You are offering them? Mr. McGregor: I am offering those in evidence, Your Honor. The Court: All right. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 27, 28, 29 and 30” ceived in evidence.) were re Q . How many grades are in that school, Mr. Lem mons ? A. There are four. Q . And how many rooms? A. One. Q . And how many teachers? A. One teacher. Q . How many students? A. Twenty-four enrolled in the white school. The Court: How far is that school from LaGrange? A. It is approximately 10 miles north of LaGrange, Your Honor. Q. What road is it on? A. It is on the highway leading to Giddings, about midway between LaGrange and Giddings. Q. On Exhibit No. 29, to the right, I see an out building there. What is that outbuilding? 315 A. That is a toilet building. Q. Is there a similar one which is obscured by the school? A. Yes, there is. Q. Are they ordinary outdoor toilets? A. They are the ordinary outdoor pit toilets. Q. One for the girls and one for the boys? A. Yes. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 26 and ask you what that is? A. That is the classroom in the white school, view of the classroom of the Warda School. Q. And I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 25? A. That is another view of the— Q. The same classroom? A. The same classroom. Q. And I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 24? A. That is a view of the drinking fountain in the Warda School. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibits 24, 25 and 26. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 24, 25 and 26” received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 6, Mr. Lem mons, and ask you where that building is which has been identified as the band building? A. This building is located about midway between the white high school building and the new elemen tary building. Q. What is the nature of the building as to con struction? What is it built out of? A. It is a wooden building. It is a regular—I be lieve they call it drop siding on the outside and it is 316 a stud wall on the inside, is finished with V-joint pine wainscoting and a celutex fiber wainscoting. Q. Now in your examination in chief you were asked about music expenditures. As I recall, you stated from your 1948-1949, I believe it was, expendi ture sheet, that there was in the inventory how much on your music expenditure for the white school? A. For the white it was $200.00 in the elementary school and $800.00 in the high school. Q. And for the point negro school how much was there? A. $500.00. Q. In other words, $500.00 to $1000.00? A. Yes. Q. These band instruments that are in this picture here, how were those instruments procured? That is to say, where were the funds received from that aided in buying those instruments? A. The band club that is composed of the parents of children who are in the high school band accumu lated quite a bit of money used to buy these instru ments. In fact, they accumulated all of the money that has been used except $500.00. Q. Do you recall what the total expenditure was, roughly? A. Considering those instruments shown there and the other instruments which we had and the uniforms which we bought the expenditure ran over $5,000.00. Q. Now all of that fund was contributed except the $500.00, is that correct? A. Yes. Q. Now on Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 8, which has been identified as the corridor in the Hermes School, I will ask you what is on either side of those corri dors? A. There are classrooms. 317 Q. And these are partition walls that are shown down that corridor? A. Yes, they are. Q. There has been introduced in evidence Plain tiff’s Exhibit 11, which shows the outside corridor at the Randolph School running east to west. Mr. McGregor: I introduce in evidence Defendants’ Exhibit No. 41. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 41’ ’ was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 41 and ask if you can tell me and show the Court approximately where this corridor crosses the corridor in Plain tiff’s Exhibit 11? A. This corridor—which is this? Q. Defendants’ 41. A. The corridor on Defendants’ 41 crosses the cor ridor on Plaintiff’s 11 just in front of the last door which is shown. Q. In other words, in Defendants’ Exhibit 1 it would be the corridor proceeding through this en trance? A. It would. Q. It would. And there is a ceiling over it and walls on either side? A. There is. Q. Now in your testimony a few minutes ago you testified that Defendants’ Exhibit 32, that when this corridor reached this point there were doors? A. Yes, sir. Q. Can you see in Defendants’ Exhibit 31 those doors and point them out to the Court? 318 A. There are the doors that you see at the end of the open area. Q. And where would they appear on Defendants’ Exhibit 32? A. Right here. Q. Now is that same condition in existence at this other corridor, at this end where it runs down the other side of the ell structure? A. It is. Mr. McGregor: I don’t believe I handed that to the Court. (The photographs were marked as “ Defendants’ Exhibits 42 to 54,” inclusive, for identification.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 42 and ask you if this opening reflected there is shown on the ele vation, Defendants’ Exhibit 1, as the place where the small and the large figure are coming out? A. It is. Q. And through that corridor there is the roof ex tending from the outside and entirely through the cor ridor to the width of the classrooms and walled on either side, is there not? A. Yes, I believe there is. Mr. McGregor: We introduce that as Defendants’ Exhibit 42. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 42” was received in evi dence.) Mr. McGregor: I introduce in evidence Defendants’ Exhibit 43. 319 ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 43” was received in evi dence.) Q. I ask you if that is the other opening or corri dor which is illustrated also by Defendants’ Exhibit 41? A. It is. Q. The sidewalk has not as yet been put in there, has it, Mr. Lemmons? A. No, it has not. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 44 and ask you which end of the building that shows? A. That shows the front of the gymnasuim and part of the west side as is shown on the left hand side of this Exhibit No. 1. Q. The property here on this side of the picture, on this side of the picket fence, that is not a part of the school property, is it? A. No, it is not. Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendant’s Exhibit 44. I now also in troduce in evidence Defendants’ Exhibits 45 and 46. (“ Defendents’ Exhibits 44, 45 and 46,” inclusive, were received in evidence.) Q. I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, if that picture, Exhibit 45, illustrates what classroom and in which school? A. That illustrates a portion or a part of the voca tional agriculture classroom in Randolph Colored High School. Q. Which part? A. It is the north and west wall, I believe. 320 Q. And what is Defendants’ Exhibit 46? A. It is another view of the same classroom. Q. What do you mean by that? A. Of the vocational agriculture room in Randolph Colored School. Q. Well, is it a side view, the other end or what? A. It is a photograph of the west wall and south wall and the space in between and it shows the tables and the desks and the places for the boys to put their books. Mr. McGregor: Now I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 51. ( “ Defendants’ Exhibit 51” was received in evi dence.) Q. I hand you with it Plaintiff’s Exhibit 33 and I ask you if they are photographs of identical rooms? A. They are. Q. Now in Plaintiff’s 33 there appears to be a wash basin lying on the floor. Did you see that wash basin lying on the floor? A. Yes, I did. Q. Did you see it actually in the building? A. I saw it on the floor when this photograph was made. Q. You went there with the man who made the photograph? A. I did. Q. Had you ever seen it on the floor before? A. I had not. Q. Did you have it repaired as soon as you dis covered it? A. I saw this wash basin on the floor on Satur day, and I had it repaired Tuesday afternoon. That 321 was as soon as I could get a plumber up there to make a connection. Q. When was the last time you had inspected the facilities there to see they were all in working order? A. Probably it was two days before we recessed for the Thanksgiving holiday and this photograph of the wash basin on the floor was made the Saturday following the Thanksgiving holiday. Q. Every time you had inspected it prior to the morning you went there and found it in that condi tion had it been in its proper place? A. It had. Q. Had it been working? A. Yes. Q. Are the plumbing fixtures of the latest and most modem design in this washroom and toilet room? A. They are. Q. By the way, were you present when that picture was actually taken? A. Yes, I was. Q. And was the taking of that picture after the taking of the picture which is represented by Plaintiff’s Exhibit 33? A. That is right. The Court: I think we will take our recess now. Recess of ten minutes. (Short recess.) Mr. McGregor: I ask leave of the Court to cross examine the witness with reference to certain cost figures subject to my ob jection as to costs. 322 The Court: All right. Q. Mr. Lemmons, what was the bid cost on the two jobs there in the LaGrange Independent School District. First, the amount of the bid cost on the additions to the Randolph School and whatever refurbishing came out of that bid cost? A. The bid cost by the construction company on the Randolph School which included the gymnasium and the four classrooms was $63,733.00 and we add to that extras which amounted to $670.72, which, I believe, makes a total of $64,403.72. Q. And what was the bid cost on the Hermes School? A. The cost of both schools, the Hermes and the Ran dolph School, was $173,334.25. Therefore the cost of the Randolph School should be subtracted from the last figure I gave. Q. In other words, the Hermes School was roughly $110,000.00 and the additions to the Randolph plant were roughly $64,000.00? A. Yes, from Fulcher-Berger Construction Company. Q. Now in the primary department of the Randolph School each one of those roms has how many grades in it? A. In the elementary division? Q. Yes. A. They have one grade to the room. Q. Is that true in the Hermes School? A. Yes, it is. Q. How many rooms are there in the Hermes’ addition? A. Twelve. Q. Twelve. I believe I started to ask you just before lunch what was the pupil load per teacher on the average daily attendance. Have you figured that for me? A. Yes, I have. 323 Q. What is the teacher load in the elementary school at Randolph? A. I have the teacher load figure for the white system as compared to the whole colored system. Q. All right. Changing the question to apply to the whole system, what is the load per teacher at the Ran dolph School? A. Rased on average daily attendance it is 20.1 child per teacher. Q. And what is it in the white system? A. 22.6 children per teacher. Q. What is the actual scholastic registration in the dis trict in percentages between the negroes and the whites? A. On the census, the latest census report which I have, 1218 white and 516 negroes. Q. And how does that figure out percentage-wise, roughly? A. It figures roughly 70 per cent white and 30 per cent colored. The Court: That is a census taken when? A. Last April, Your Honor. That is a census which we are operating on this year. Q. Now when the Hermes School was open where did the pupils come from that were put in the new Hermes School? A. Part of them came from classrooms in the old school building. Part of them came from outlying rural schools which have been transported in. Q. In other words, some of the elementary school pupils that are now in Hermes came from schools which had been previously maintained in outlying localities? A. Yes, sir. 324 Q. Does the School District still own those outlying pieces of lands that their schools were on? A. We own parts of them. We have sold parts of them. Q. You have sold parts of them. Where were the stu dents that are now in the elementary portion of Randolph before the construction of the addition to the Randolph School? A. Some of them were housed in the old portion of the Randolph School. Some of them came from outlying schools which are now closed. Q. The cost figures that you gave a while ago in re ference to the two buildings, did that include the archi tect’s fees? A. It did not. Q. Did it include the equipment, the interior equipment of the building? A. No, it did not. Q. Mr. Lemmons, there is an exhibit which I will ask the reporter to give me a tag number for sitting on this table. (The school desk was marked as “Defendants’ Exhibit 55.” for identification.) Mr. McGregor: In the absence of objection I will now introduce this in evidence. (“Defendants’ Exhibit 55” was received in evidence.) Q. I will ask you what it is, Mr. Lemmons? A. It is a classroom arm chair with a book compart ment in it. Q. I will ask you if that has been approved by the State Board of Education, by the State of Texas? A. It has. 325 Q. I will ask you if that comes in varying sizes? A. Yes, it does. Q. Now you have put on new primary rooms at the Randolph School and I will ask you if you have equipped those rooms for the pupils with this type of seating accom modation? A. Yes, we have. Q. Is every room so equipped with that type of seating accommodation ? A. Yes. We bought, I believe, 180 of those chairs and they are in the new rooms at the Randolph building. The Court: In the new rooms as well as the old rooms? A. No, they are in the new rooms at the Randolph School. Q. Now that size chair comes from what room? A. That came from the first grade room. Q. And you are using that new equipment through what grades? A. Through the first four grades. Q. What is the opening on the side of Exhibit 55 for? A. It is for a book compartment for the children to place their books and pencils and paper. Q. I see in front of Exhibit 55 a table like plane struc ture. What is that used for? A. That is used as a desk or a writing surface for either reading or writing. Q. Is that desk arm adjustable? A. It is. It is adjustable in height and also the angle may be adjusted on it, the slope. Q. In Plaintiff’s Exhibit 30 which has been identified as coming from the Hermes School, I will ask you if that is the same type desk and chair or if it is a different type desk and chair? 326 A. It is a different type desk and chair. Q. Please tell the Court the difference. A. The seating equipment in Hermes School is made up in units with a desk in front of a chair. The two are connected by a cross bar which runs along the floor and is supported by four short legs. Q. The desk itself has four short legs? A. The whole unit is made up in one unit. There are two legs for the desk and two legs for the chair and the two are connected by a bar which connects the two leg units. Q. I see. Does this desk adjust out as this desk will adjust? A. No, it does not. Q. It is therefore a fixed desk? A. No, this desk has an adjustment on it. You can ad just the height of the desk as you can adjust the height of the writing service on this chair. You can also make a flat plane top on the top of this desk but you do not have the degrees of adjustment that you have in that writing arm there. Q. Now this seems to be a bulbous sort of desk there. Is that a storage compartment there? A. It is. Q. In other words, instead of storing books in this type desk in Exhibit 55 in here (indicating under seat) there is a storage space underneath the surface of the desk for the books? A. There is. Q. The desk in Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 30 requires the pupil to raise the lid or open the top of it to get his sup plies from that desk, is that right? A. Yes, it does. Q. I will ask you if this is also an approved desk by the State Board of Education? 327 A. Yes, it is. Q. Now I believe you stated this morning that this land was given to this school by Mr. Hermes and that was the reason it was named for him? A. That is correct. Q. And I will ask you if Mr. Hermes supplied any other funds for the erection of this school? A. He did. He supplied $10,000.00 in cash and stipu lated that it be used in building and equipping that school. Q. And has it been so used? A. It has. Q. Now there has been testimony here that you had a home economics room in both the negro school, the Randolph School, and in the white high school. I will ask you if they are equipped with stoves? A. They are. Q. Do you recall how many in each? A. There are four stoves in each. Q. I will ask you how frequently those stoves are replaced? A. Those stoves are replaced with each model change. When the manufacturer changes the model and produces a more modern stove. The old stoves are removed and new stoves put in. Q. And is that true in the Randolph School as well as in the white school? A. It is. We obtain the stoves on the same contract from the gas company. The Court: You use natural gas there? A. Yes, Your Honor. 328 The Court: Where does it come from? A. The gas? The Court: Yes. A. United Gas out at Schulenberg. Q. Mr. Lemmons, there is some testimony here, I be lieve, by the witness Scott in reference to seeing flies in the kitchen on one evening when he was there at the PTA. Are there screens for the gymnasium at the Randolph School? A. The screens for the cafeteria have been delivered and they were to be installed this week. Q. Have they been installed as yet? A. I don’t know. I have not been there since Monday. Q. As a matter of fact, there is still some work going on in the gymnasium, is there not, in bringing it to full completion? A. Yes, there is. The basket ball goals are being in stalled and the screens are being installed. Q. On the side of the gymnasium at the Randolph School shown in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 23, on the right hand side there are presently some tables there and it has been testified that that is where the students eat. There has been introduced here in evidence a picture of a gymnasium at the white high school and on one side of it is shown some stands which may be used as bleachers, I presume, or on which chairs may be placed. What are the plans in reference to placing bleachers in this new gymnasium? A. It is our plan to place bleachers along one side of the gymnasium at Randolph School. Q. You are not going to do it on the other side? A. No, because the kitchen is on the other side. 329 Q. This side of Exhibit 24 shows where the kitchen is? A. That is correct. Q. And so the bleachers will not be placed on that side? A. No. Q. By the way, Mr. Lemmons, how many students are there in the high school portion of the Randolph School? A. I believe 98 are enrolled in that high school division. Q. And how many students are there in the high school portion of the white high school? A. 232. Q. In other words, 98 to 232. Now there are none of these new desks in the white high school, are there, Mr. Lemmons, Exhibit 55? A. There are not. Q. And there are none of the new desks of the type exhibited in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 29 in the new white high school, are there? A. There are not. Q. As to the desks that are in the older portion of the Randolph School where they now have the high school, please state in your judgment as an educator if they are substantially equal to those in the rooms at the Randolph High School? A. Yes, they are. Some of them are as good or better, and some of them are worn more. They vary from room to room and desk to desk. Q. Would you say that they are on average about the same? A. I would. Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 48 and ask you if that is a room in the white high school? A. Yes, it is. 330 Mr. McGregor: I introduce Defendants’ Exhibit 48. (“Defendants’ Exhibit 48” was received in evidence.) Q. I hand you Defendants’ Exhibit 3, which has been previously introduced, and ask you if that is a room in Randolph School, a portion occupied by the high school? A. It is a room in the Randolph School. I don’t know whether it is one of the rooms occupied by the high school or not because it is just a portion of it and I can not identify it as a high school room. It is either high school or junior high school. Q. The desks reflected there, are they comparable to the desks reflected in Defendants’ Exhibit 48? A. Yes, they are comparable. They are a different style, but they are just as usual. Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 5 and ask you if that is a room in the white high school? A. It is. Q. Can you tell me roughly about how old those desks are? A. Those desks are roughly 20 and 25 years old or possibly older. I base my opinion on the style of the desk and the material from which it is made. Q. Is that style desk used any more in school? A. I haven’t seen one for sale. Q- Is the raised portion of any utility in the modern school? A. Not to my knowledge. The Court: Where are those, in the white school? 331 A. Yes, Your Honor. Q. I hand you, Mr. Lemmons, Plaintiff’s Exhibit 36 and ask you what that picture portrays? A. That portrays the playground in the rear or back of the Randolph Colored School. Q. And what is the white building to the left of the picture? A. That is the vocational agriculture classroom and farm shoproom. Q. I will ask you what the nature of this land is, as to whether or not it is flat or rolling or just what it is? A. It slopes from the back of the lot down towards the gym. We have cut a broad drainage ditch or water pit there to carry the water off the playground. Q. To which direction? A. To the west of the gymnasium we have cut a drain age ditch along the west side of the gymnasium to carry the water into the city storm sewer at the end of our prop erty. Q. At the end of the property? A. Yes, sir. Q. To the west? A. Yes, sir. Mr. McGregor: I think Your Honor has already seen that. Q. Now the landscaping that is reflected in Defend ants’ Exhibit 1, that has not as yet been done, has it, Mr. Lemmons? A. No, it has not. Q. Why? A. Because the landscaping engineer who was doing the work told me that it would be better to wait until the fall of the year and reset those plants during the dormant 332 stages rather than set them up in September when it was still hot, and we would get better results if we waited till fall. Q. Is there any planting planned within the patio or behind the building? A. The patio has been landscaped and planted with shrubbery, ivy and grass. Q. Is there any planting planned presently for the back of the school? A. There is some planting planned alongside the open corridor between the gymnasium and the old building Q. I see. A. And we are planning to grade the playground in the rear of the building. Q. That area that you just heretofore referred to is between this ell and the old building and this portion of the gymnasium? A. For the planting? Q. Yes. A. Yes, but it would be on the other end of the gym right alongside the walkway. Q. I see. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 20, Mr. Lem mons, and ask you if you recognize that? A. Yes, I do. Q. What is that room used for? A. This room is used for two purposes. The back portion of the room is used for a bus repair shop where the school mechanic repairs the school busses. The other portion of the room is used to refinish school furniture. The Court: At the Randolph School? A. No, sir, that is at the white high school. That is in a separate building between the white high school and the Hermes School. 333 Q. Is it on the grounds of the old high school property or is it on the grounds of the property given by Mr. Hermes for the Hermes School?, A. It is on the ground of the old high school property. Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 16 and point out the framed matter on the wall there, facing the camera, and ask you what those are? A. Those are photographs. Some of them are photo graphs of prize winning hogs and the bulletin board also has the ribbons and the awards and the pennants which were won by the boys who entered the hogs in various local shows. The Court: What school is that? A. This is the white school building, vocational build ing. Q. In other words, those are the things that the boys or students themselves won or put there? A. Yes. Q. They were not put there by the LaGrange In dependent School District? A. No. Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 3 which purports to be a picture of the white high school and ask you what this is in this picture? A. That is a volley ball court, net and upright posts. Q. Do you have a volley ball net for the Randolph School? A. Yes, we do. Q. Where is it? A. It is located on the playground directly to the back of the gymnasium. 334 Q. And what is this over here to the right in that pic ture? A. That is a part of the tennis court. Q. Is there more than one court there or just one? A. There are two courts there. Q. What are they built out of? A. Concrete. Q. Are they the only two courts in the whole system? A. Yes, they are. Q. I hand you another view of the white high school and ask you what this is here? A. That is an old bench laid across a frame or an up right pipe structure which was formerly used for a seesaw. Q. I see. And what is this? A. That is a swing. Q. One seesaw and one swing. Is that all that there is on that yard, on that school grounds? A. Well, there are a number of trees. Q. I mean of that type equipment? A. Yes, sir. Q. There is not anything else like that on any part of that ground? A. There are—you mean the grounds shown in the photograph or the— Q. The white ground? A. Yes. There are a series of swings. The leg of one of them is shown right here in the lower left hand corner of this photograph. Q. How many are in that series? A. I believe there are six. Q. So you have seven swings on that ground. Are there any more than that? A. That is all that I know of, I believe. Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 4, which has been testified to as being a corridor of the white high school, 335 and on the right hand side of that corridor I point out to you some objects which have been testified to as being steel lockers. What is the present thinking in the use of steel lockers in public schools? A. We have found that it is more practical for the children to hang their clothing and their other—well, their hats and their shoes, in the classrooms on hooks where they will be open and so we get ventilation on them and dry them out if they are moist, wet. Q. What happens to them if they are put in lockers? A. Well, they remain wet all day because there is very little ventilation in a steel locker. They build up an odor over a period of time until it creates more or less an unsanitary condition and surely an odor which is not pleasing to have in a school corridor or school building. Q. In all your new construction are you putting in any such type locker? A. We are not. Q. Are any of your plans for any future improvements, betterments or construction, do they include for either the white schools in the district or the colored school in the district the acquisition of such a type locker? A. Not a steel locker, no. Q. And that is true, is it, Mr. Lemmons, whether it is elementary or high school? A. Yes. Q. I hand you Plaintiff’s Exhibit 21 and ask you what that is? A. That is a part of the farm workshop at the negro high school. Q. And I will ask you what that closet there contains? A. That contains tools and equipment which is used by the students taking vocation agriculture in this school. Q. What type tools are supplied for that course in the Randolph School? 336 A. They are supplied with all of the hand tools which are needed to do repair work to build simple houses and gates and feeders that are used on the farm. Q. Is a similar course given in the white high school? A. It is. Q. And where is it given? A. It is given in a separate building, vocational agricul ture building, on the grounds of the white high school. Q. Do they have similar tools? A. Their tools are not as new as these and they do not have as many of them. I bought, or the school district rather, bought these tools that are used by the colored stu dents last spring, I believe. They have not been in use but three or four months and at that time we bought all of the tools which the vocational agriculture teacher in the negro school needed, which he said he needed. Q. In other words, you filled the requisition that he sent to you? A. Yes. Q. I hand you Plaintiffs Exhibit 17 and ask you what room that is a part of? A. That is a part of the classroom for teaching voca tional agriculture in the Randolph Colored School. Q. Now, on yesterday Mr. Jackson, the teacher of that course in the Randolph School, testified that there was a circulating heater there of some type similar to that which is found in the gymnasium at the Randolph School to be installed in that room and to do away with the type of heating that is there now. Now I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, as being in charge of the LaGrange Independent School System, if there is a heater to be put in that room? 337 A. There is. Q. And if it is to be installed in the near future? A. Yes, it will be. Q. Is it just one of those items that you have not gotten to? A. That is correct. Q. Mr. Lemmons, during your present school year, how many students do you have taking typewriting in the Randolph School? A. I have 18. Q. Divided into how many classes? A. Two classes. Q. How long is each class? A. One class period is a 45 minute class period. The other class period is an hour class period. Q. Now what time of day is the first period in type writing? A. From 8:15 until 9:00 o’clock. Q. When is the other one? A. The second one is from 1:30 until 2:00 o’clock. I beg your pardon, from 1:50 until 2:50. Q. I see. And the typing class uses the room which is shown in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 15? A. Yes, sir, they do. Q. And that also is the room utilized for the library? A. Yes, sir. Q. What time does the elementary school take up in the morning, Mr. Lemmons? A. About 8:30 or 8:40. I have forgotten which. Q. And what time does the elementary school let out in the afternoon? A. About 3:45 in the afternoon. Q. Do you divide up your high school work into library periods for the students in the high school portion of the work at Randolph? A. Yes, it is. 338 Q. Does the use of the room there for the two typing classes at the time you say prevent you from getting in the necessary number of library periods for the 90 high school students? A. No, it does not. Q. There was handed to you what has oeen marked as Plaintiff’s Exhibit 39 which seems to be a letter from Mr. W. J. Durham with some sort of instruma it attached. That was never inquired about, was it, Mr. Lemmons? A. No. Q. Now on yesterday you were asked about the value of school property which was recapitulated on what seems to be page 11 of your 1948-1949 school year report. I will ask you if that is not in the nature of what is called a running inventory? A. It is. Q. In other words, this does not represent current ex penditures on page 11 at all? Mr. Durham: Now, Your Honor, we object to that as being leading and suggestive. That is an intelligent witness and— Mr. McGregor: This is cross examination. Mr. Durham: He is an adverse witness, Your Honor. The Court: I think that is leading. Mr. McGregor: Very well, Your Honor. 339 Q. On page 11 of Plaintiff’s Exhibit 38 I will ask you to look at column No. 1 and advise me whether there are any current expenditutres represented on there? A. There are not. That represents an accumulation of expenditures over a long period of years. Q. An accumulation of expenditures, you say? A. For property that represents the cost or the value which has been assigned to the property over a long period of years. These figures are inserted each year by re ferring back to the last year’s report and being brought up to date. Q. Well, for example, here, this item $2,000.00, column No. 1. Do you personally recall what that item was put in there to cover? A. No, I don’t. Q. The item $10,100.00. Do you know what that item was put in there to cover? A. No. It covers part of the, probably, some of the old furniture which was already in the plants and probably some of the new furniture which was bought. Q. May it also represent donations to the school? A. It could. Q. Would they be included in those totals had there been donations? Mr. Durham: Your Honor, we object to this type of testimony as being speculative. It may have been or may not have been. It has no probative force as to what it could be or may have been. The Court: I think he may answer it if he can. A. Would you repeat the question? 340 Mr. McGregor: Would you read the question, please? (Question read.) A. That all depends on what the donation was for. If it were for property which would be used year in, year out, durable property, it would appear in there, but if it was for property which would be consumed in a year or so, like a library book or something that would be used up in a short time, it should not appear in that column. Q. In other words, if you received donations of books to your library would you or would you not put that in one of these columns? A. I don’t believe I would put them in one of these columns. Q. Now in item 22 on page 11, Exhibit 38, I see item No. 1, number of school desks and what is shown in refer ence to the number of useful desks? A. 750 for white and 500 for colored. Q. There was introduced on yesterday Plaintiff’s Ex hibit 37 and on page 11 of this Plaintiff’s Exhibit 37 the same type of columns are shown. A. They are. Q. And they represent expenditures over the years or acquisitions of property over the years as you testified in reference to Exhibit 38? A. Yes. They represent the property inventory which is accumulated over a period of years. Q. What else does Exhibit 37 contain on its other pages? A. It contains a listing of the teachers, their salaries and training in the white school. A listing of the certifica tion of the teachers in the white school. The experience and tenure of white teachers. Grade distribution of the 341 children in the white school. The attendance table for children in the white school and the colored school. Teacher’s position, salaries and training for colored teachers, certifications of colored teachers, the experience and tenure of colored teachers, grade distribution of children in the colored school and the attendance report of children in the colored school. A listing of buildings in use, listing of private schools and enrollments in schools in the Independent District. Q. Now do you have the salaries there of the white and colored teachers? A. No, I don’t have that with me. Q. Before the Court meets in the morning, will you get the salaries of the white and colored teachers and aver age those salaries up and be prepared to testify as to how the salaries of the teachers compare. Now does this report show the number of students graduated from the negro high school in the year 1947- 1948? A. Yes, it does. Q. How many were graduated? A. Eleven. Q. How many actually attended this senior class of the high school that year? A. I believe only 11 attended that year. Q. And they all graduated? A. I believe so, yes. Q. How many attended the senior class of the white high school that year? A. Fifty-five. Q. How many graduated? A. Fifty-five. Q. In the school year 1948-1949 how many attended the senior class in the colored school? A. Fourteen. 342 Q. How many graduated? A. Well, there were 14 enrolled and 13 were graduated. Q. And how many attended the senior class at the white high school during that year? A. Fifty-one were enrolled throughout the year. Q. And how many graduated? A. Thirty-nine. Q. Thirty-nine graduated out of 51? A. That is right. Q. Can you tell me how many are enrolled in the senior high school at LaGrange, Randolph High School, this year in the senior class? A. No. I don’t have those figures with me. Q. Will you bring them in the morning, please? A. I believe I can get it. The Court: Do you have any idea about how many of white graduates for this year, for instance, and how many of the colored graduates went on to college, University or some higher schools? A. In the white school there were about 35 per cent of them, Your Honor, and I am not familiar with the number in the colored school because the principal sends those transcripts out. I don’t know how many of them went to college. The Court: Do you know whether any of them did? A. Yes, I am sure that—I believe three that I know of. The Court: I see. 343 Mr. McGregor: You are referring, Your Honor, to the year ending June, 1949? The Court: Yes, sir. Q. Perhaps you could have that information for us tomorrow? A. I believe I can. The Court: Well, it is not of any great deal of importance, but I was just wondering. One important feature about an educa tion, about a school, is how many go on and finish their education. Mr. McGregor: Excuse me just a second, Your Honor. May I have the Plaintiff’s first amended petition, please. May I have leave of the Court to mark Plaintiffs first amended original complaint as an exhibit? The Court: You can, but the instructions to the Court reporter would be not to take it out of the clerk’s possession. (Plaintiff’s first amended original complaint was marked as “Defendants’ Exhibit 56,” for identification.) Mr. McGregor: Yes, sir. 344 Q. Now, Mr. Lemmons, Defendants’ Exhibit No. 56, the first amended original complaint of the plaintiff herein states that there is a public address system supplied in the white school at LaGrange. Is that true? A. It is. Q. And just what does that system do? A. That system has a radio, a phonograph and a public address system assembled in one unit in my office with speaker outlets in each of the rooms in the old high school building and the gymnasium and the shop building. It has an extension microphone which is installed in the auditorium, gymnasium out there, and I believe it has 33 outlets in the various rooms. We can put a radio program on or phonograph music or anything from a phonograph record into any one or all the rooms at one time. We can use it for a call system, that is, a public address system or anything of that nature. Q. How did the LaGrange Independent School System acquire that? A. That was donated to us by Mr. George Lauderstein of LaGrange. Q. Exhibit 56 states there is an automatic electric sig nal clock at the white school at LaGrange. Is there an automatic electric signal clock in the Randolph School? A. There is. Q. Is there one in the white school? A. Yes, there is. Q. Plaintiff’s Exhibit 56 says that there is an elec tric fire bell in the white school at LaGrange. Is there an electric fire bell? A. There is. Not. Q. Defendants’ Exhibit 56 in stating that there is an electric fire bell in the white school does not state what kind of a fire warning system there is in the Randolph School. What kind of fire warning sys tem is there in the Randolph School? 345 A. There is a gong which has been made by taking the hub from an automobile tire or automobile wheel rather, and mounting it on the wall, and a hammer which has been made by taking a large nut and attaching it to a wooden stick to make an arrange ment very similar to a hammer. It is attached to the assembly so it will stay right with the assembly with a chain, I suppose, about two feet long. Q. And how would you operate that fire alarm? A. You would take your hammer and hit the gong or the drum. Q. That is a drum instead of a hub? A. Yes. It is really a brake drum. Q. That is the same thing as you have got in the white school, is it, Mr. Lemmons? A. That is true. Q. I asked you this morning if during the time that you had been at the LaGrange Independent School Dis trict in your present capacity whether or not you had de clined to give any students other than Vivian Brown a course which was requested of you. As I recall, your an swer was that you had not? A. I believe at that time you were referring to colored students who made requests for courses. Q. You are absolutely right. And was your answer that you had not? A. That is right. I never did. Q. Since the application of Vivian Brown for the chemistry course on December 5, 1947, have you received any other application of any kind or character for a course in the Randolph High School by any Negro child? A. No, I have not. Q. Has it been necessary from time to time in the Ne gro high school to decline to give what are known as the elective courses? 346 A. I don’t recall declining to give one of those courses. The application of Vivian Brown was the only application that has ever come to me from a student in the Randolph Colored School. Q. Well, I have gone over now to the white high school. Have you ever declined an application for one of the elec tive courses? A. Oh, yes. Yes, sir. Q. In the white high school? A. Yes, sir. Q. I am sorry, I confused you. Then there have been occasions in the white high school where you have de clined to supply elective courses to a pupil because it was not, or whatever the reason was that you could not give that pupil that course? A. Yes. I declined to give a course in first year Ger man, to, I believe, five or seven students in the white school this year because the class was too small to be, well, economically feasible. Q. Now how many janitors do you have for the unit over at the white school? A. I have two full time janitors and two part time janitors. Q. And when do the part time janitors work? A. One of them comes to work at 9:00 o’clock in the morning and works until 3:30, and the other one comes to work at 4:00 o’clock in the afternoon and works till 6:00 or 6:30, or until he finishes sweeping. Q. How many do you have at the Randolph School? A. I have two full time janitors at the Randolph School. Mr. McGregor: Take the witness. 347 Re-Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. Mr. Lemmons, in 1947 and 1948 you required the Negro school teachers to do the janitor work, didn’t you? A. For two or three months at that time we did. Q. And I believe during that period of time you paid out for janitorial service at the white school, that year, $1,500.00 for the janitorial service in the white school, and $180.00 for the janitorial service in the Negro school? A. That is probably right. Q. Did you ever require, during that period of time, the white teachers to do janitorial service in order to hold a job? A. Yes. Q. And you had white teachers serving as janitors down in the white school? A. In all of the outlying schools the white teachers were charged with the responsibility of keeping the school clean. Q. I will confine my question to the city limits of City of LaGrange. Mr. McGregor: I object to that question. This is a suit against the La- Grange Independent School District. The Court: He can inquire as to any one part at a time. Q. Now, confining my question to the schools located within the confines of the city limits of LaGrange, did you require white teachers to serve as janitors in order to hold their jobs? A. If I recall, the yare required to supervise the pick ing up of paper on the playground, supervise the picking 348 up of paper in the classrooms and keeping the buildings and grounds up. Q. Now, as an educator, in your mind, is there any dis tinction between the teacher in school and the janitor? A. Well, yes. They have got to work together, though, to operate an efficient school system. Q. Now, the same white persons that you have em ployed as janitors in the white school, did you have them employed as teachers? A. Of course not. Q. Now the same persons you had employed in the Negro school, you directed those to do the janitor service, didn’t you? A. I did not. I had them supervise the picking up of paper by the Negro children. Q. Now did you have any other persons to clean up the playground in the Negro school during the same period of time except the Negro teachers? A. No, we didn’t have any. Q. And that includes the buildings, too, that were used for the Negro school? A. Sure. They operated just like the outlying white schools did. Q. Now you testified that there was a school located for white students, pupils, at Ellinger I believe? A. I did. Q. Negro students are not permitted to attend that school? A. No. Q. Solely on account of their color? A. On account of the constitution of Texas. Q. I say, no Negro student is permitted to attend that school? A. No. 349 Q. And he is refused the right to attend that school because he is a Negro? Mr. McGregor: Well, I think that is a conclusion of law which is sup ported by the constitution and the statute. The question is argumentative. The Court: He can answer it if he can. A. I have answered it twice, Your Honor. No, they are not allowed to attend the white school. Q. Thank you. Now at the time the Negro rural schools were abolished, did any Negro pupils or students live in the rural area? A. Yes. Q. Did any live in the Ellinger community? A. I believe that when that school was closed there were only 12 or 14 attending that school. Q. Twelve or 14 Negro children? A. Yes. Q. Attending the rural school? A. Yes. Q. Thank you. Now what became of those children? A. They were furnished bus transportation from their homes to the Randolph School in LaGrange. Q. And the white children, those in the elementary grades from the first grade on to the eighth, were permit ted to attend a school there at Ellinger? A. The white children? Q. The white children? A. Yes. Q. The bus that picked them up at their homes had regular schedules for picking them up, did it not? 350 A. It did. Q. And the children had to go to the highway and wait for the bus, that is, the Negro children? A. No. The bus which transports the Negro children starts on his route down below Ellinger right near the center of that colored community down there and he picks up most of the children near their homes. Q. That is what I say. They come to a point for the bus to pick them up? A. They come to a point closest to the road. Q. Closest to the road. Now did you build any shel ters for the children to protect them from the elements, the weather, during the rainy season at the points where the busses were to pick them up? A. No. They are picked up at their individual gates. Q. And during the rainy season there is no shelter or protection furnished by the Independent School Board for the protection of those children from the elements or the weather while they are waiting on the bus, the Negro children? A. That is correct. There are none. Q. The white children in that same vicinity are per mitted to go directly to a school located in that paritcular vicinity for white children? A. Yes. Q. Now the Negro children from the Ellinger commu nities, they are compelled to travel approximately 11 miles to LaGrange in order to reach a school? A. That is right. Q. To which they are permitted to go? A. That is right. Q. Thank you. Now there were Negro children in the Warda community, too, weren’t there, Mr. Lemmons? A. No, there was never a Negro school out there to my knowledge. 351 Q. Well, there were some Negro citizens living in that particular area? A. I believe so. I believe there were only four or pos sibly six students of scholastic age out there. I am not sure of the number. Q. To be exactly correct, to refresh your memory, weren’t there six children out there? A. It may be six. Four or six. A small number. Q. Now the Warda School that you have testified about is operated out of tax money and by the Independent School District? A. Yes. The Court: I think we will adjourn until 9:30 in the morning. Mr. McGregor: May it please the Court, may I ask leave of the Court to permit me to examine Plaintiffs Exhibits 37 and 38 over tonight? Mr. Durham: That will be fine. The Court: That is all right. (Adjourned at 4:30 p. m.) December 8, 1949, 9:30 A. M. The Court: Be seated, gentlemen. You may proceed in the case on trial. 352 C. A. LEMMONS resumed the stand and testified as fol lows: Re-Direct Examination— (Continued). By Mr. Durham: Q. Mr. Lemmons, you are the same Mr. C. A. Lemmons that was on the witness stand when the Court adjourned yesterday? A. I am. Q. I believe you testified that there were six Negro students in the Warda School at the time the Negro school was abolished? A. No. I believe I testified that there were six Negro students out there now. The Negro school in the Warda Common School District was abolished before the Warda Common School District became a part of the LaGrange Independent School District. The Court: What was that again? A. The Negro school in the Warda Common School District was abolished before the Warda Common School District was consolidated and became a part of the La- Grange Independent School District. The Court: There is no school there at all you mean? A. There was no colored school there when it became a part of the LaGrange Independent School District. It is now a part of the LaGrange Independent School District. Q. After the Warda Common School District became a part of the LaGrange Independent School District I be 353 lieve you continued and you are continuing now a school building and school facilities in the Warda School area for white children between the grades of 1 and 8 or 1 to 8? A, No. That is between the grades of 1 and 4. Q. 1 and 4, thank you. Now there are not any school facilities in the Warda community for the six Negro chil dren? A. No. Q. I believe a bus picks those children up? A. It does. Q. And it takes those children to a school located within the city limits of the City of LaGrange and known as the Randolph School? A. It does. Q. Approximately what distance is it from the Warda community and where those Negro children live to the Randolph School located in the city limits of the town of LaGrange? A. I believe it is about 13 miles. Q. Approximately 13 miles? A. Approximately 13 miles. Q. Now does the bus go out in the morning and pick up the children? A. The bus driver lives at the end of the line. Four of those children are his children. The bus leaves his house in the morning and then proceeds to LaGrange. Q. And it picks up two other children? A. It does. Q. Now those children go over to the road or highway where the bus passes? A. Yes. Q. Is there any shelter to protect these children from rain, snow and cold weather? A. No, there is not. 354 Q. And does it rain during the school season down there? A. Yes. Q. You have snow occasionally? A. We have had snow twice in the past three years. Q. Twice in the past three years. What time does the bus leave down at the Warda community in the morning, Mr. Lemmons? A. I believe it leaves between 7:15 and 7:30 o’clock in the morning. Q. Just approximately that is? A. Yes. Q. The school opens in LaGrange at what time, the Randolph Colored School? A. At 8:30. Q. The children are brought in to the school in the bus? A. They are. Q. In the evening, what time does the bus leave La- Grange going back? A. Approximately 3:45 in the afternoon. Q. What time does school dismiss in the afternoon at LaGrange? A. At 3:45. Q. Then the bus is standing waiting for the children to come out of the school? A. Yes. Q. And it takes them home over the same route? A. Yes. Q. Was the construction started on the Hermes Ele mentary School before the repairs were started on the Randolph School? A. No. We started the repairs at the Randolph School in the summer of 1948, I believe, when we remodeled the interior of the school and repainted all the walls and the ceilings and repainted the partitions in the rooms. 355 Q. When the repairs were started in the Randolph School I believe the other Negro schools over the country were abolished? A. No. Some of them were left in operation until the close of the past school year. Q. Until the close of the past year, 1947-1948? A. No, 1948-1949. Q. All right. Now I believe you testified yesterday, Mr. Lemmons, that the selection of the books in the li brary for Negro students, that is, in the Randolph School was done by the principal? A. Well, that is done by the teachers. The teachers make their recommendations to the principal and, of course, the librarian in the high school makes her recom mendations based on the information she has from the State Department of Education, and he assembles an order and brings it to me. Q. Now that is done for each school? A. Yes. Q. Do you have a librarian in the high school known as the LaGrange High School for white? A. Yes. Q. Full time librarian? A. She is a part time librarian and part time study hall keeper. She keeps all the study halls except one period a day and during that period she teaches girls physical education. Q. And you have examined into her credentials to de termine her qualifications as a librarian? A. Yes. Q. And it is your opinion that she is fully qualified academically as a librarian. That is in the white school? A. No. She is as well qualified as I could find at the particular time when we organized our library and put on the modern library practice which we follow in our 356 schools. She does not have a high school certificate. She is teaching on an elementary certificate but she has some library science and the State Department of Education has given me permission to use her until such time as she can go to school in the summer and meet the requirements. Q. Yes. Now she has had some training in library science? A. Yes. Q. Now as to the Negro school, the Randolph School, is there any librarian? A. Yes. Q. Who is that? A. There are two women over there who are qualified, I believe. The one now serving is a Mrs. Duvall. Q. Mrs. Duvall? A. Yes. Q. You have examined her credentials? A. I have. Q. Now has she had any training in library science? A. I don’t recall whether she has or not. She is work ing with a Miss Moore who has had training in library science. Q. And Mrs. Duvall is the librarian over there? A. They are working together. I don’t know which one is designated as the librarian. They change from period to period. It is a smaller school and when one of them is in the classroom the other takes care of the li brary. Q. Thank you. Now as superintendent of the LaGrange Independent School District, don’t you have a record of the assignment of the teachers as furnished you by the principal? A. I do. Q. Can you tell me now from that assignment which teacher you say has been assigned as a librarian in the Negro school? 357 A. Roberta Moore is assigned to the library in the Negro school. Q. And it is not Mrs. Duvall? A. No. She keeps study hall in there and checks out books for Miss Moore when Miss Moore is not in there. Q. What other assignment is given Miss Moore? A. She teaches English in the high school. Q. How many hours does she give to classroom work? A. Four hours. Q. How many hours does she give to library service? A. Two. Q. Two hours. Now during the time she is in the class room is any librarian or the service of any librarian fur nished the children in the Negro school? A. From 11:00 to 12:00 o’clock Mrs. Duvall is assigned to the office and takes care of the library and from 12:50 to 1:50 o’clock she is on the same assignment. Q. Thank you. I believe, Mr. Lemmons, that it is necessary, in order that the child gets the full benefit of library service, that the library be available to the stu dents at all times during school hours? A. Not necessarily. The children can go to the library when it is open and check out whatever books they need for their particular study. Q. It is of educational value for the child to have the benefit and advice of a librarian in even selecting the reading matter. Isn’t that true, Mr. Lemmons? A. It would be, yes. Q. Yes. I will ask you if in the library it is not a fact that you have reference books that cannot be taken out and must be left there for the benefit of the entire school body and must be available at all times? A. Yes. There are encyclopedias and dictionaries which are not checked out to be taken home. However, 358 the teachers may check them out to be used in their rooms for classroom reference work. Q. The children in high school, they use the library not when they are in the classroom, for reference work, don’t they? A. In some instances, yes. Q. Now if a class is being taught and I believe you have testified there is a class taught in the room desig nated for the Negro library? A. Yes. Q. Do you think that interferes with the free use of the library for the Negro children? A. Yes. It is not used during those periods. Q. Then the Negro library is not open at all times to the students? A. No. Q. And there is no class had in the library of the white school? A. No, but there is study hall kept in it for every period. Q. And that study period is where students can go in and use the facilities of the library? A. Yes. Q. Do you believe that the free use of a library where the students can come in and have a study period at any and all times of the day and especially during class periods, is that of any educational value? A. It is in a large system where you have two or three or four hundred students, but you only have 50 to 100 or possibly 125, and the volumes are available to them enough so that it does not make a material difference. Q. Well, you have got more than 300 students in the Negro school, haven’t you? A. Not in the high school division. 359 Q. Well, do the elementary school students use the li brary at all? A. I believe Junior High uses it, but in the elementary division the teachers have library book shelves in their particular rooms and they take the books to the rooms and supervise the use of them in the elementary classroom work. Q. Is that done in the white school? A. It is. Q. You also have a library in the white elementary school, known as the Hermes School, don’t you, Mr. Lem mons? A. Yes, we do. Q. I believe yesterday you said that the library in par ticular was built up or supported by a per capita assess ment on the student body up until about a year ago? A. That is right. Q. I believe you further said that the money was col lected by the principal of each school? A. Yes. Q. And it was kept separate. Now, after you collected the money and before you spent it, where did you keep it? A. For the white school it was kept in the First Na tional Bank at LaGrange. Q. Have you got the deposit slip or book? A. Yes, I have. Q. Would you get that, please, and also where you kept the money collected from the Negro school? A. That was kept by the Negro principal. I don’t know where he kept it. Q. That is, the Negro principal kept the money? A. Yes. Q. Do you know what he did with it? A. He was instructed to buy library books with it. 360 Q. Did he do that? A. I know of my own knowledge he bought some books. He never gave me an accounting of expenditures. Q. You don’t know what he spent the money for? A. No. Q. But you do supervise the spending of the per capita money from white children and you saw that the books were actually purchased with the money raised? A. Yes. Q. And as far as you know now the money that was collected from the children under your direction as super intendent for the purpose of buying library books in the Negro school, you don’t know whether it was spent for that purpose? A. I know some of it was spent for it. I have seen books come in, have checked the lists. But the colored school principal wanted to buy the books and check them in so I let him go ahead. Q. But you didn’t check to see whether or not the money was actually spent for the books as collected? A. Well, not penny for penny, no. Q. And you don’t know what books were purchased, if any? A. Not without referring to the files kept in the li brary. Q. Did you keep a list of the books purchased by the white library? A. The white librarian keeps that list. Q. Is that under your supervision? A. Yes. Q. How did you keep a record and how do you know now the volumes that are in the Negro library when you kept no record of it? A. The Negro principal keeps the record and on his principal’s report to me at the end of each year he shows the number of volumes which are in his library. 361 Q. But as far as your own knowledge is concerned you don’t know whether they are there or not, do you? A. I have not counted them. Q. Then when you testified with reference to the num ber of volumes in the Negro library that is based solely upon what the Negro principal told you? A. Yes. Q. The item on Plaintiff’s Exhibits No. 37 and 38, which are the annual reports that you filed with the State Superintendent the number of volumes in the Negro li brary is listed in those exhibits and that number was based upon the same information as you have testified you got from the Negro principal? A. Yes. He sent me that information on his report. Q. During the period of time that you were collecting this money and directing it to be collected from Negro students, you were acting as the superintendent of the La- Grange Independent School District? A. Yes. Q. And you were acting under orders of the Board of Trustees? A. Yes. Q. Now, if you will, will you get us the deposit slip, the bank book, showing the deposit of money that you ac quired per capita for library facilities? Now, Mr. Lemmons, do you have the years listed there and the amounts collected each year? Mr. McGregor: Well, Counsel, I understood you restricted your inquiry to after 1946. Mr. Durham: That is right. I said 1946. 362 A. These are for 1947 and 1948. Q. All right. Will you tell the Court how much money was collected for the white school for the school year 1947-1948 and deposited in the bank? A. Excuse me, Your Honor. I have got to get this straight. I have a deposit slip here for May 17, 1948, for $10.90. I have one for May 25, 1948, for $2.98. I have one for April 14, 1948, for $26.00. I have one for October 17, 1947, for $8.00. I have one for October 15, 1947, for $2.00. I have one dated October 15, 1947, for $59.00. I have one dated October 8, 1947, for $46.00. I have one dated October 7, 1947, for $93.00. I have one dated for March 2, 1948, for $3.95. Q. Now is that all, Mr. Lemmons? A. I believe it is. Q. Thank you. A. There might be another slip out, but I haven’t checked it against the bank statement. Q. In your opinion there may be one out? A. There may be. Q. Do you think there is more than one out? A. I don’t believe there is. Q. And in your opinion, just judging from the records that you have, approximately how much would that de posit be, Mr. Lemmons? A. I believe it would be between $200.00 and $225.00. Q. Now will you go to the school year 1948-1949? A. This is 1947-1948 and during 1948-1949 we did not collect. Q. You did not collect. All right. Thank you. Now please get me the list of books that was purchased for the white library during the school year 1947-1948. I believe you testified that you had that? A. I testified that the librarian at LaGrange keeps that list. 363 Q. Well, I believe you were asked to bring the vouch ers and the contracts and bids for all contracts, supplies, including canceled checks for the Negro school and for the white school? A. I have those. Q. All right. You have the checks issued for the vol umes in the library, don’t you? A. They are not separated. I did not have time to separate them. Q. Well, you will separate them for us? A. I will if I have time, yes. It will take some five or six hours to go through those. Q. Now, Mr. Lemmons, I believe you testified a few minutes ago that you saw books being brought into the Negro school for the library? A. Yes, sir. Q. What year was that? > A. That was—well, I believe I have seen them go in every year. Q. Did you see any go in in the school year 1947-1948 while you were collecting this per capita amount? A. I believe I did. I cannot remember specifically that far back. Q. Well, I believe you testified a few minutes ago that the money was left with the Negro principal and that you saw during that time, books coming in and he furnished you a list of them? A. I don’t believe I testified to that. Q. Well, what did you testify to then about your see ing the books coming into the school? A. I testified that from time to time I see the books coming in and that I supervised the library over there, and that the Negro principal and Negro librarian keep a list of the books in the library. 364 Q. All right. Did you see books added to the Negro library each year while that per capita tax was being col lected? A. I believe I did to the best of my recollection. Q. Have you seen books added each year since it has been abolished? A. Yes. Q. And you saw them go into the Negro school? A. Yes. Q. In Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 37, which was the report filed by you with the State Superintendent of Education for the school year 1947-1948, you filed a report under oath that there were 579 volumes in the Negro library. That is correct, isn’t it, Mr. Lemmons? A. Yes. Q. And 2988 in the white library? A. Yes. Q. The following year you filed what has been intro duced as Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 38. According to your re port had any volumes been added to the Negro library? A. The number is the same. There were probably some replacement volumes on various books. That number could be in error because that is the number that the prin cipal furnished me and it is possible that he went back to his last report and copied it. Q. As a matter of fact, you don’t know whether there were any additions there, do you? A. I know there were two sets of encyclopedias pur chased for that school during that period and there was one unabridged dictionary purchased, and several other volumes. Q. In seeing to the facilities in the white school you check those personally and keep the records and you knew they were there? A. No. I took the librarian’s report just as I took the Negro librarian’s report. Now the State Library Super 365 visor has started a process which they call their weeding out process, whereby they go through these books and pull out old volumes, torn volumes, and obsolete volumes and recommend that we replace them to keep our libraries up to date. Q. And you tell the Court it is your opinion they pull out the exact number each year and replace the exact number each year? A. No. I don’t mean to leave that impression. The figure may be in error. I don’t know. It is a figure that was furnished me and I sent it in. Q. Well, did you leave it up to the white school prin cipal to collect money from the white students and put the money in deposit in some bank you didn’t know any thing about and make such purchases as they thought, such supplies as they thought ought to be used for white schools? A. No. The white principal collects the money and they issue their receipts for it. The money was turned over to my secretary who deposited it in the bank. When the books were bought they were bought on the recom mendation of the librarian or the teacher. Q. Thank you. I believe, Mr. Lemmons, you say that each year, spring, I believe, if I am correct, you have the principals make a survey to determine the number of stu dents who want elective subjects offered? A. We did that in the white school the past spring. Q. What did you do in the Negro school? A. We did not make a survey in the Negro school un til September. Q. You never made it until September. Why did you make it in the spring for white and didn’t make it until September for Negroes? A. We just didn’t get around to it. We had a building program going on over there, and remodeling program, and we just didn’t get it done. 366 Q. I believe you stated that in having this survey made that the principal was instructed to ascertain such facts with reference to Negro students? A. Ascertain what? Q. The facts, that is, who wanted to take elective sub jects? A. Yes. Q. Now I believe you testified the first day you were on the stand that there were a number of elective sub jects offered in the white school that were not offered in the Negro school? A. Yes. Q. Now as to those subjects the Negro principal would not be able to offer those subjects as elective subjects, would he, because they were not offered in the Negro school? A. We offered them. Q. You offered a subject that was not offered in the Negro school to Negro students? A. He could offer the subjects and if a student wanted it or a number of students wanted it, it would be put in the curriculum. Q. Did you offer the subjects in the spring to white students? A. Yes. Q. And not to the Negroes? A. Well, we just didn’t get around to it. We offered the same subjects to them, but when school opened in the fall. Q. Well, I believe you testified the other day for the school year 1947-1948 and the school year 1948-1949 that the following subjects were offered in the white school but were not offered in the Negro school: Solid geometry, trigonometry, German, chemistry, physics, mechanical drawing, workshop tool units, bookkeeping, commercial 367 arithmetic, secretarial training, Jr. business training, music including four units and band, safety education. Now those were the subjects you said the other day were not offered in the Negro school but were offered in the white school? A. No. I testified that they were taught in the white school and not taught in the Negro school. Had there been a demand for them, they would have been taught, but there was no demand, therefore there was no reason to pay a teacher $2,400.00 to stay over there and do noth ing. The Court: Were they offered in the Negro school as well as the white? A. Yes. All of those courses were not taught in the white school either. Commercial arithmetic has not been taught in the white school for a number of years. Shop work was not taught in the white school last year. We just discontinued that. Q. Now you did list the subjects taught in each school with the Department of Education, didn’t you, in order to be accredited? A. Yes. Q. I will ask you to examine the Standards and Activi ties of the High Schools in Texas on page 138 and tell the Court what subjects were listed with the Department of Education in the State of Texas as being offered in the LaGrange white school. Mr. McGregor: May I see that a moment? 368 Mr. Durham: I will be glad, as soon as I get it marked, Your Honor, to give it to Mr. McGregor. The Court: Well, I think when you go to question the witness about a document that both counsel are entitled to see it. Mr. McGregor: May I ask a question, Your Honor, on voir dire? The Court: Yes. (By Mr. McGregor): Q. Is that an official publication of the State of Texas, Mr. Lemmons? A. Yes, it is. Q. Is it the one you use in your school district? A. Yes, sir. Mr. McGregor: Very well. (By Mr. Durham): Q. Now, will you read to the Court the subjects listed as having been offered in the LaGrange School for whites, first. A. Well, these are not the subjects being offered every year. These are the subjects in which we have accredita tion. Q. Thank you. Will you now answer my question? A. Well, I just answered your question, because all of these courses were not taught last year. Q. Were they offered the year before? 369 A. Some of them were. Q. Will you read what was listed and filed by you with the Superintendent of Public Education in Texas as to subjects? A. All right. English, 4 units; world history, 1 unit; American History, 1 unit; Texas history, half a unit; civics, half a unit. General mathematics, 1 unit; algebra, 2 units; plain geometry, 1 unit; solid geometry, half a unit; trigo nometry, half a unit. German, 2 units general science, 1 unit; biology, 1 unit; chemistry, 1 unit; physics, 1 unit. Vocational agriculture, 4 units; homemaking, 4 units; me chanical drawing, 1 unit; shop work, 2 units. Bookkeeping, 1 unit; commercial arithmetic, half a unit; typewriting, 1 unit; secretarial training, 2 units. Jr. business training, 1 unit. Music, 4 units; safety education, 1 unit. Q. Will you read the subjects offered by you in the Negro school? A. Well, again, your question is misleading. These are not the courses offered. These are the courses which have been taught and accredited. Q. All right, the ones taught. A. English, 4 units; American history, 1 unit; Negro history, Texas history, 1 unit; civics, 1 unit. General mathematics, 1 unit; algebra, 2 units; plain geometry, 1 unit; general science, 1 unit; biology, 1 unit. Homemak ing, 2 units, vocational agriculture, 3 units, and typewrit ing, 1 unit. Q. Thank you. Now I believe you stated that at the close of the school term of this past year, that is, 1948- 1949, you made a survey to determine the number of white students that desired elective courses? A. Yes. Q. And you waited up until the opening of the school in September to determine what Negro students wanted in elective courses? 370 A. That is correct. Q. I believe you testified the other day that you did not have a Negro who had the academic traiinng to con duct classes in junior business training? A. No. That course, I don’t believe I have one. Q. And you have one in the white school? A. Well, the course offered—let me think. Yes, we have one qualified teacher. Q. And I believe you said that you did not have a teacher who had the academic training for secretarial teaching in the Negro school? A. I believe that is right. Q. And you did have one in the white school? A. Yes. Q. And the other subjects we discussed the other day, is that correct? A. You mean including all the subjects you listed the other day? Q. No, those subjects you testified the other day you did not have a teacher for, you still say you do not have them now? Mr. McGregor: I think that question is so indefinite. Mr. Durham: I will change it. Q. I believe you testified the other day you did not have a teacher who had the academic training in the Ne gro school to teach mechanical drawing? A. That is right. Q. You had one in the white school? A. Yes. Q. Mr. Lemmons, in your opinion as an educator, is it any advantage to a child to offer at the close of one term 371 of school the elective subjects from which he might choose instead of waiting up until the first day of school term in which to offer him that opportunity? A. There may be some difference, but there is a dif ference in the two schools. When the Randolph School opened this year there were very few colored students who enrolled at the beginning of the year. We did not employ one teacher. So that if somebody wanted some of the elective courses we could search for that teacher, you see. We employed that teacher some two or three weeks ago. But had there been a demand for any of these elec tive courses, we would have had one teacher, a place for one teacher so that we could have gone out into the field and satisfied the demand and offered the course in Ran dolph School. Q. Thank you. But the same privilege was offered the white students in May or the close of the previous school year without any demand, wasn’t it? A. Well, they were given the same list to select the courses from and all of those courses were not being taught in the white school either, because there was no demand for them. Q. But answer my question now. The white students were not required to make a demand. They were given the elective subjects at the close of the school year and given until the first of the year to make the selection. A. No, that is not right. That is a pre-registration sheet, and when a child selected the course that he was going to take, the courses, those are the courses he has taken this year unless there was some specific reason for changing them. By that I mean a reason that was logical, not just because he wanted to change courses, but because of a change of curriculum or a change in his mind as to whether or not he was going to college. 372 Q. All right. How soon after you gave the applications to the white students was it before they were required to make their choice as to the elective subjects? A. I believe they had two days. Q. They had two days? A. Yes, sir. Q. From the day they were given? A. Yes. Q. All right. Then you made preparations for that class to be taught? A. Yes. Q. Within two days after it was given? A. No, no. We made the schedule, made the skeleton schedule for the coming school year so we could determine what classes would be demanded and what classes would be taught. Q. Yes, I follow you. A. Yes. Q. Now, after you made that schedule you gave to the white students the subjects that would be offered at the close of the school term in 1948-1949 from which to select. That is true? A. Yes. Q. And the white students had two days from the date he was given the application and after the assignment had been made up for the next school year in which to make his election? Mr. McGregor: I think the predicate in the question does not reflect the testimony and is misleading. It incorporates the making up of the courses for the next year, and I don’t think the witness said that. 373 The Court: The witness may answer if he can. A. Will you restate it, please? Q. I will try. I believe you testified that the subjects to be offered, the tentative, the subjects to be offered, not those to be taught, were made up first for the next school year? A. Yes, for the whole system. Q. All right. After that, your curriculum is made up, then you offered to the white students or you did offer to the white students what has been introduced as Defend ants’ Exhibit 31? A. Yes. Q. And that contained the subjects that were to be of fered at the subsequent school term? A. Yes. Q. Now after a similar blank as the blank introduced as Defendants’ Exhibit 31 had been given the white stu dent, he was given two days from that date in which to make his selection from the elective subjects? A. Well, some of them were, yes. It took about two days for the principal to interview all the high school stu dents and make out the list. Some of them had two days and some of them probably half a day. Q. Now in the selection and choice given the students from among the elective subjects he had the advice of the principal and his teacher in making this election? A. He had the advice of the principal only. Q. He had the advice of the principal. Now, when he had exercised his choice this was turned in to the superin tendent? A. No. The principal made the schedule. Q. And it finally reached the superintendent? A. Yes, in final form. 374 Q. In final form it finally reached the superintendent. Now you knew at the close of the term of the white school what students desired to take elective subjects, didn’t you? A. Yes. Q. In the Negro school you waited up until opening day, which was what day in September? A. I believe that was about September 5 or 6. It was the first Tuesday in September after Labor Day. Q. Before the Negro students had the privilege of making a choice from the subjects offered. That is true, isn’t it? A. Yes. Q. I believe you said you had only one teacher em ployed in the Negro school on opening day? A. No, I didn’t say that. If I did, I didn’t mean to. I said that we had one vacancy or a place on the budget to employ one extra teacher so that if there was a demand we could possibly meet it with the teachers which we had on hand. Q. Now, when the white student exercised his choice in May or June at the closing of the last term the United States Superintendent along with the trustees made prep arations and provided facilities for the teaching of those classes, didn’t you, Mr. Lemmons, in the white school? A. Yes. We had the facilities. Q. Now when a Negro student made his election on the opening day of school you had to still make provisions for the teaching of that class? A. Yes. Q. And the class, if it was in chemistry, and you didn’t have a laboratory, then you had to install the facilities for teaching it? A. Yes. Q. And yet you waited up until the first day of the school term? 375 A. Yes. Q. And you did that this school term? A. Yes, because at the end of the first week of school the enrollment was so low. It is always low and I think we dismissed the colored school for three weeks to get the children back into the classes. The time was being made up during the holiday and the school will be extend ed at the end of the year to give them the same number of days in schooling as the white children get, but during the fall of the year they did not attend school because they had left the county and gone out to different places to work. Therefore we had three weeks after enrollment in which to make arrangements for them. Q. But you provided the facilities for the teaching of those elective courses in the white school as of the first day of school. That is true, isn’t it? A. All of them that we could, yes. Q. But you waited until the first day of the term of school for Negroes to get ready to provide for them, didn’t you? A. Well, yes. Q. Nov/ I believe you said that you have got an agri culture teacher over at the Negro school who is teaching the class in the Future Farmers of America. That is Jack- son? A. I believe they call that organization the New Farm ers of America, NFA. Q. Does it embrace the same subjects as the Future Farmers? A. Yes. Q. I believe you said you put a pig pen on the Negro school campus? A. I believe they have two hog houses. Q. It was back of the playground? A. Yes. 376 Q. In fact, it was on the playground, wasn’t it? A. It was on the extreme side of the playground. Q. I say, it was on the extreme side of the playground? A. Yes. Q. How many pig pens did you have there? A. I believe we had two hog houses there. Q. Did you keep hogs in them? A. They brought them in from time to time, yes. They didn’t keep them in there continuously. They brought them in and took them out. Q. They kept hog pens on the playgrounds and put hogs in them from time to time? A. Yes. Q. Now I believe the hog pens and cow pens and barns for teaching agriculture in the white school are on this tract of land Mr. Hermes gave? A. Yes. Q. Some distance from the school? A. No. The playground runs right up to that. They are on the edge of the playground, too. Q. Do you have a pig pen on it? A. Yes, I believe there are four there. Q. On the edge of the playground of the white school? A. Yes. Q. Who was principal of the Negro school, that is the Randolph School, during the school year 1947-1948? A. I believe William Farris was the principal for the first half of the year. Q. That is W. R. Farris? A. William Farris, and then William Drisdale was principal for the last part. Q. Was a class in chemistry being offered in the white school at the beginning of the term— 377 Mr. Durham: Strike that. I believe you have testified about that. Q. You testified that you refused to give the plaintiff in this case, Vivian Alpha Brown, chemistry during the school term of 1947-1948, did you, Mr. Lemmons? A. Yes. Q. Now you had a chemistry class, there was a chem istry class being taught to white students in the white school that year, wasn’t there? A. Yes. Q. And there was a chemistry class started in the white school on the first day of term in that year? A. On the first day of term. Q. Whatever day it was in September? A. Yes. Q. And I believe you testified that no Negro teacher had been hired in the Negro school to teach physics, chem istry, during the school term 1947-1948? A. I believe that there was a teacher over there who was qualified to teach it. I believe a teacher named Moore was qualified to teach it, but there was not a class. That is my recollection. I think that Moore had either 12 or 18 semester hours in chemistry from Prairie View. Q. Now in December, 1947, I believe most of the Ne gro teachers had been fired? Mr. McGregor: Had been what? Mr. Durham: Fired. Mr. McGregor: How is that relevant to any issue in this case? I object to that as irrelevant and immaterial. 378 Mr. Durham: I think it is very relevant. If there were no teachers available to teach my client and there were teachers in the other school teaching the same subject, I think it is very material. Mr. McGregor: I am not objecting to the proposition of showing wheth er or not there were not any teachers available to teach the students, but what I am objecting to is the relevancy of hiring or discharging as far as conduct is concerned as it is not relevant to any issue as to equal facilities. The Court: Objection overruled. Mr. McGregor: Note my exception. Q. I believe a portion of the Negro teachers had been dismissed from the Negro school at the time Brown came up to you and asked that his children be instructed or fur nished instruction? A. I believe there had been three teachers discharged at that time. Q. And one of them was Moore? A. Yes. Q. And that is the same teacher you say was eligible to teach? A. At the beginning of the year he was eligible to teach. The Court: I want to know why they were discharged? 379 A. They were discharged for driving the school bus at an excessive rate of speed up and down the highways. The Court: Three teachers were driving the school bus? A. Two of them were, Your Honor. The Court: What was the other one discharged for? A. He was discharged by the School Board be cause of a student strike that occurred at the negro school, and after the School Board’s investigation they discharged him. The Court: All right. Q. Now, on the opening day of the school term of 1949-1950, there was no running water in the room that is designated in the Randolph High School for negroes as the laboratory? A. No. Q. There was no heat, jets or plugs there furnish ing heat in the room designated as the laboratory in the negro school, known as the Randolph High School in LaGrange? Mr. McGregor: I object to all this repetition. It has been gone over on direct and cross examination, too. The Court: I think it has, but go ahead, I will hear it. A. Would you restate your question, please? 380 Mr. Durham: Your Honor, may I say this— The Court: I said you can go ahead. Mr. Durham: Oh, thank you. In the interest of time, if it is ad mitted that those things were not in there at the be ginning of the school term— The Court: I did not understand it as an admission of anything. You are raising questions that have been gone into heretofore, but I will let you do it again if you want to. Q. The facilities that are in the library at the high school used exclusively for whites in LaGrange and in particular those facilities that are in the library at the white school and those similar facilities in the ne gro school, are denied to negro students solely be cause of color and race. That is true? A. I don’t understand your question. Q. All right. There are certain facilities in the white library that you have testified about, in the library of the white school which is used exclusively by whites? A. You refer to those volumes bought by the white people? Q. No, sir, I refer to everything in the white li brary that is not in the negro library? A. All right. Q. The negro students are denied the right to use it because they are negro? A. That is right. 381 Q. Now the facilities in the laboratory in the white school which are not in the negro school laboratory, the negro students are denied the right to use those facilities. That is, the running water and the test tubes that they do not have in the negro school? Mr. McGregor: Now just a minute. I object to that. Mr. Durham: Well, I will strike the question. Mr. McGregor: I object to the question because it incorporates a predicate not substantiated by the evidence. On the basis that the record is devoid of any evidence to show that there are no equipment or supplies in the negro school room that are supplied in the white school room. The Court: Let him answer it in his own way if he can. A. Would you repeat the question, please? (Question read.) A. I can testify to this, that the negro students are not allowed to use the white laboratory because we have separate schools for them. Some of the facil ities in the white laboratory are found in the negro laboratory. Some of them are not. Some of the facil ities in the negro laboratory are not found in the white laboratory. Q. Now this— 382 A. May I finish, please? Q. Pardon me. A. And some of the facilities are used for both. For example, the miscroscopes are used for both the white biology class and used by the colored biology class. Some of the specimens and microscopic slides are transferred back and forth. The chemical sup plies are transferred back and forth as they are needed. There is no reason to have two or three sepa rate store rooms when we can operate out of a central store room at a more economic cost and give better service to the students. Q. Thank you. I believe you stated there are some facilities in the white laboratory that are not in the negro laboratory. A. There are some. Q. What facilities are those? A. Those laboratory tables we referred to. Q. And is there water in the negro laboratory? A. No, there is no water in the negro laboratory. Q. Any gas? A. No. Q. Now the facilities that you have just testified to that are in the white laboratory and not in the negro laboratory, the negro students are not permitted to use those tables, running water and so forth which are now in existence in the laboratory in the white school, solely because they are negroes. That is true, isn’t it, Mr. Lemmons? A. That is true. Q. Thank you. Now I believe the landscaping at the white elementary school is complete? A. Part of it is. Q. And that school was started after the repairs were made at the negro school? 383 A. Yes, it was started after the repairs were made. Both the negro building job and the Hermes building job started with the same contractor at about the same time. Q. Now, Mr. Lemmons, I believe you stated that you have made— Mr. Durham: Your Honor, I want to interrogate this witness with reference to his testimony as to what he intend ed in the future without waiving our objection. The Court: All right. Go ahead. Mr. Durham: Thank you. Q. I believe you stated that you had made some application for some other facilities for the negro school. Is that right? A. Yes. Q. You introduced in evidence what has been marked as the Defendants’ Exhibit No. 37. Now when did you make the order for these supplies A. I made that order, I believe I testified, between the fifteenth and seventeenth of August, as best I recall. Q. Have you a copy of your correspondence? A. Yes, I have. Q. And it was your opinion that it was between the fifteenth and seventeenth? A. That is right. Q. The negro school was to open on the fifth of September, 1949? 384 A. About that date. Q. And you waited until between the fifteenth and seventeenth of August to order the supplies? A. To order these tables, yes. Q. Now I believe you told Mr. McGregor yester day that you knew it was difficult to obtain such equipment for a chemical laboratory for they had to have special attention, is that right? A. I did. Q. All of the facilities including these tables for the negro laboratory, as far as you know, are still in the warehouse of the manufacturer? A. No. All of the facilities which I ordered during August have arrived except these tables. Q. I don’t think you understood my question. I said all those you have not received, as far as you know, are still in the warehouse? The Court: Which warehouse? Mr. Durham: The manufacturer’s warehouse. A. I believe that these tables are being made up on special order. It seems they make them up and ship them out. I don’t know where they are. Q. But as far as you know, that is, of your own knowledge, those tables are still in the manufac turer’s possession? A. Well, I don’t know because I received a tele gram from them on my last inquiry that they would be shipped during the month of December, and I don’t know if they have been shipped or not. Q. Well, all right. Up until today, you, as Super intendent of the Independent School District of La- Grange, have not received those tables? 385 A. They had not been shipped to LaGrange when I left LaGrange Monday morning. Q. You have never seen them? A. I have not. Q. They have never been delivered to you? A. No. Q. They have never been placed in operation as any equipment or facilities of the LaGrange Inde pendent School District? The Court: That is argumentative, counsel, and takes time. Everybody understands that these tables have not arrived yet. Q. How many students did you say were being taught chemistry in the LaGrange negro school? A. I believe sixteen or seventeen. Q. And all the laboratory facilities that you have got for teaching those subjects to the negro students are what you have testified about, in the negro school? A. Yes. The facilities that are shown on these photographs that I saw the other day. Q. Now I believe you stated there are eighteen negro students taking typewriting? A. I believe there are sixteen or eighteen. Q. How many typewriters do you have for ne groes? A. I believe there are eight. Q. How many for whites? A. Twenty-four or twenty-six. Q. How many white students are taking it? A. Twenty-six, I believe. Q. And you have twenty-four or twenty-six type writers? 386 A. Yes, I have twenty-six typewriters, I believe. Last year I had one hundred students taking type writing and the same number of typewriters. Last year we had typewriting in the white school but we had about one hundred students with the same number of typewriters, twenty-six. Q. I believe you stated you had two or three ten nis courts, concrete tennis courts for white? A. We have two. Q. Do you have any for negroes? A. No. Q. Are those courts used in connection with the playgrounds and activities of the white students? A. They are. Q. And negro students are not permitted to use those? A. Well, they have never been refused. I have never seen any of them over there, but those play grounds are used all week—I mean, over the week end. Q. I believe you testified yesterday, Mr. Lem mons, that the ratio or percentage of negro popula tion was about twenty-four per cent? A. No, I believe I testified that it was about seventy per cent white and thirty per cent colored. Q. I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, if it is not a fact that in the entire scholastic enrollment population of the Independent School District of LaGrange, Texas, if the negro population does not represent forty-two and nine-tenths per cent of the entire enrolled school population? A. Well, I don’t know about the enrolled school population. My figures come from, the scholastic cen sus which represents all of the children living within the confines of the district. 387 Q. Now I believe you stated that that was twelve hundred and some odd white students? A. I believe there were 1,218 white students. Q. And how many negroes? A. 516. Q. 516. Now, Mr. Lemmons, I believe you testi fied yesterday that the school building, the repairs done to the school building for negroes, cost approxi mately $69,000.00? A. Yes. Q. And the new school building, that is the ele mentary for whites, cost $110,000.00? A. Yes. Between $110,000.00, and $120,000.00. Q. Somewhere in that neighborhood? A. Yes. Q. Now did you build any other elementary schools during the school year 1948-1949? A. No. Q. And those were the only two schools you built during the school year 1947-1948? A. We didn’t build. Mr. McGregor: I must object to continuing to put false premise in questions, Your Honor. He just asked the ques tion, 1948-1949, and then inserted the premise 1947- 1948 in the next question, calculated to confuse and mislead the witness. The Court: The witness was about to answer. A. Would you repeat the question. Q. During the school year 1947-1948, I believe you did not build any elementary schools for either negroes or whites? 388 A. As I recall, we remodeled the old Randolph building. We spent about $5,000.00 or $7,000.00 on it. I have forgotten. Q. $5,000.00 or $7,000.00. Now, how much equip ment did you buy for the elementary school, white, the Hermes School during the school year 1948-1949, and after you had filed your report for the school year 1947- 1948? A. I don’t know. Q. Have you got a list of it, Mr. Lemmons? A. I don’t have it with me. I have the invoices, sir. Q. Would that show the amount? A. It would take three or four hours to get together, yes. The Court: We will take a recess of ten minutes. (Short recess.) The Court: Be seated. During the recess when I was in chambers some one of the counsel who have another case set for Monday asked me if this case would run over into next week. Apparently, he had been talking to you gentlemen. What did you tell him? Mr. McGregor: I told the young man, Harbin, I believe it was, that there was an indication from the plaintiffs that this would be the last witness and if that were true in all probability this might be my last witness. 389 Mr. Durham: We expect to recall Brown, the plaintiff, and I don’t think it will take us over fifteen minutes with him, and then one other witness. I am positive, as far we are concerned, it won’t take us but ten min utes, with him. The Court: Well, I am not complaining, but I just wanted to get an idea. All right proceed. Q. Mr. Lemmons, in an elective subject, how many students, the minimum number of students, must make request before you will give an elective subject? A. That depends, as I testified yesterday, I be lieve, on the grade level at which the subject is offered and the situation at the particular time when it is offered. Ordinarily, we require ten to take it but it might be a course like solid geometry or trigonometry and we will open a class for seven. Q. For seven? A. Yes. Q. All right. A. But we have refused to teach German I to seven freshmen because they have an opportunity to get it further along in their school career. Q. In a subject where the minimum number is seven, what is the maximum number allowed in each class? What is the maximum load per student? A. Per student? Q. Yes. The number of students that can enter a class. 390 A. Well, that again varies with the subject that is being taught. Do you mean on the high school level, or— Q. Yes, sir. I mean on the high school level. A. Oh, in the white school we have thirty-five, thirty-six in the English class and the history classes are large. Q. Then it would range from a seven student minimum up to thirty six or thirty-seven load? A. That is right. Of course, as I stated before, the situation can change at any time. There is no set rule on it. It is just the way it has been operating. Q. Would you give an elective course to one stu dent? A. That depends on the particular situation. Q. The particular situation. I believe yesterday you testified that the school, elementary school known as the Hermes School, cost $110,000.00 for con struction. In what has been introduced as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 37, at the time you filed your annual report for the State Superintendent as to the value of the grounds for elementary schools in the La- Grange Independent School District during the school year 1947-1948, you showed a value of school build ings for whites in the sum of $10,000.00. I believe that is true, isn’t it, Mr. Lemmons? A. Yes, if this is a true copy. Q. Well, let me get your copy. A. That is all right. Q. I think if we get your copy it will be all right, Mr. Lemmons. Let us have your copy. A. That is correct. Q. That is correct? A. That is correct, yes. 391 Q. Now in the subsequent year, will you take your copy, that is as shown by Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 38, you show school buildings for elementary schools for whites in the LaGrange Independent School Dis trict have increased from $10,000.00 to $188,000.00? A. Yes. Q. That is right? A. Yes. Q. All right. You spent only $110,000.00 on this elementary school, I believe you stated, the building of it? A. Approximately that. $110,000.00 to $125,000.00, approximately, I believe. Q. All right. Say $125,000.00. What did you spend the difference between the $125,000.00 and the $178,- 000.00 on, shown to have been spent on elementary schools for that year? A. Not this figure, $188,000.00, does not represent an expenditure as I testified yesterday or the day before. During this period of time there were several schools annexed or consolidated with LaGrange School District, and the value of their property goes down with this figure also. I don’t remember how many schools. There were three or four annexed during the school year. They were common school districts and Warda was one of them, I believe, and the school district in that area of the county. That does not represent an expenditure. That is just an inventory of values assigned to the properties from various sources. It is not an account from a set of books because no books have been kept on any of those schools. 392 The Court: Has there been any evaluation placed by the School Board in the City of LaGrange? Has any one evalu ated those properties? A. No, sir. They have not been appraised, Your Honor. The Court: Where in LaGrange do you regard as the center of the city and would that be the most valuable property in the downtown section? A. I believe it would, Your Honor. Q. How far is the white school and how far is the colored school from the downtown section? A. The white school is about six or eight city blocks from the square, Your Honor. Q. In what direction? A. East. The Court: By “ square” you mean where the Court House is? A. Yes, Your Honor. That is the business area of the town around the Court House Square. The Court: How far is the white school from that? A. Six or eight or maybe ten blocks. I don't be lieve it is— The Court: East? A. Yes. 393 The Court: Does that throw it out in the residential section? A. Yes, it does. The Court: And there are no businesses out there? A. There are new business houses being built there. There are business houses directly across the street from it and there is a smoke drying plant across another street west from the school building. The Court: Where is the colored school located? A. It is about half a mile northeast from the white school, probably eight or ten blocks north of the white school, Your Honor. The Court: How far from the business center of town? A. I judge it will be twelve or fourteen blocks. The Court: Is that in a residential or business section? A. It is predominantly residential, Your Honor. There is one barber shop and cafeteria across the street from it, or cafe, rather. The Court: Well now, that residential section around the white school, is that occupied by white folks? A. Yes, they are. 394 The Court: Largely or entirely? A. Entirely, Your Honor. The Court: And around the colored school by whom is it occupied? A. By colored people predominantly. The Court: In point of blocks, I am not talking about buildings now, but I am trying to get a picture of the land itself, from point of area, which is the larger; the land occupied by the white school or the land occupied by the colored school? A. The land occupied by the white school. The Court: How much larger? A. The land occupied by the colored school, I would judge, is between three or four acres and the land occupied by the white school is between ten and twelve acres. The Court: Between ten and twelve acres. As I understand it, both schools are within the LaGrange City Limits as well as in the free school limits? A. Yes, Your Honor. 395 The Court: In what direction does that school district extend in LaGrange? A. Well, the school district extends to—well, it extends northwest to beyond the town of West Point. The Court: You go up past West Point? A. Yes, Your Honor. The Court: How far is West Point? A. It is about twelve miles, I believe. The Court: I see. Q. And then the district extends back southeast to below Ellinger. The Court: Is Ellinger southwest of LaGrange? A. It is southeast of LaGrange. It extends to the County Line, I believe, towards Ellinger, and then to the east it extends out to the County Line, Ruters- ville, about six miles, and then it extends west to about six or eight miles. It is quite an oblong district and the boundaries are very irregular because it is composed of the smaller school districts which have been added on. 396 The Court: How far is LaGrange—or is it in the center of the district? A. It is approximately in the center, Your Honor. The Court: Has it been customarily with the schools generally to reach out and take in territory of that kind? That is, for a school district in a town to reach out and take in farmer territory, farming communities? A. Yes, sir, it is. The Court: Is there any other school district of that kind in the county? A. Yes, there are, I believe, four more, Your Honor. The Court: Do they have, as you have, a system of bringing the children in by bus? A. Yes, Your Honor. The Court: Does that prevail in any other county up in that country? A. Yes, it prevails in almost all of the rural areas of the state, I am told. 397 The Court: In other words, they are sort of doing away with the old country schools and instead of having those, they are hauling the children in to the towns and villages and cities for educational purposes? A. Yes, Your Honor. The Court: I believe that is all. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, that is all. Re-Cross Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. Mr. Lemmons, you were asked yesterday— The Court: You had him then, counsel. Don’t take up too much time. Mr. McGregor: I am not going to, Your Honor. There are some fields I want to inquire into that he opened up. The Court: All right. Q. Now, this Bulletin 507 that you were inter rogated about in reference to accrediting of certain courses. It has not been marked as an exhibit but as I recall you were interrogated about it. Would you tell the Court, please, how the course gets accredited in here? 398 A. To accredit the course on the high school level, the course must be taught in the high school for one year and during that year the teacher accumulates certain exhibits, that is, examination papers, note books, scrap books, and other pieces of information which would give the State Department of Education a sample of the work being done in that class for a year. If that work meets the standards set forth by the Accreditation Division of the State Department of Education then the course is accredited and the course is entered on the accredited list. If the course is not taught for a number of years the sym bol is removed from the accredited list. Q. Then does the accrediting list that you talked about there have anything to do with the offering system which you have testified about? A. It does not. Q. Now on this Exhibit 31, I believe it is, do you have that here? Mr. Durham: He has it, I believe. Q. On this Exhibit 31 that you were asked about a while ago, are those the courses that were given, or those that were offered? A. Those are the courses that were offered. Q. When was the first year that system was in stituted ? A. This past year, the year that is now in pro gress. Q. Before that system of consulting with the stu dents was there any fixed system? A. Yes. The schedule was made and then the stu dents were told to select the courses from a schedule which was given them. This way, by taking the new 399 method, we can give a wider choice or a wider selec tion of elective courses to the student and we feel that we can give give them a better education in that manner. Q. I believe I asked you when I had you first on cross, but now this has come in, I won’t bother about it. Has there been any one requesting one of these elective subjects under this system that has been denied? A. Do you mean from the colored school or from the white? Q. Well, from the colored school? A. No, not to my knowledge, there have not. Q. You were asked a little while ago or rather late yesterday in reference to the Ellinger school, if the colored pupils were picked up in that area and taken to the Randolph School? A. Yes. Q. Are the white pupils in that area picked up and taken to the white school in the downtown area of LaGrange? A. The white pupils in the elementary grades of Ellinger School are picked up and unloaded at the Ellinger School. Then the high school students are taken on to LaGrange. Q. Are there any shelters or facilities supplied for the white students such as you were interrogated about to protect them from the weather? A. There are no facilities furnished by the school district. Some of the parents have built shelters for them, but they are built on their own land. The Court: Where were you raised, Mr. Lemmons? A. I was raised in Hamilton County, Texas. 400 The Court: Hamilton County. Where is that? A. It is about midway between Waco and Brown- wood. It is up near Stephenville. The Court: Were you raised up in the same community with negroes? A. No, I was not. The Court: Have you lived in the same community with them? A. I have lived in LaGrange since 1936, Your Honor. The Court: Well, what I am getting at is whether you, as Sup erintendent of the schools there, have got in your heart below your vest pocket any prejudice or hos tility to the negro race? A. I don’t believe I have, Your Honor. The Court: I was raised up with them. I have never mistreated one in my life. Can you say that? A. I don’t remember ever mistreating one. The Court: What I was getting at is whether your operations of the schools there, as Superintendent, where you have 401 those children of both races under your charge, whether you have in your mind and a heart a feeling that you want to discrminiate or to mistreat the negro race? A. I don’t believe I have, Your Honor. The Court: All right. I just wanted to get your feelings. Q. Now you were asked a little while ago this morning as to whether or not the Randolph School was opened at the same time that the white school was opened in the district, or white schools, and you answered that it opened, I believe you stated, on September 5, but that some of the children left the county. I think you stated they went to pick cotton or went to other counties or something like that. Is that a matter that the School Board has any control over? A. No. It is not. Q. You were asked late yesterday afternoon in refer ence to whether or not you have full time janitor service at the Randolph School and in the course of that inter rogation I was unable to understand whether or not that was full time janitor service. Is it? A. Well, we have two full time janitors employed at the Randolph School. Q. Are they employed for the purpose of taking care of the entire premises? A. Yes. The Court: I don’t have a remembrance in my mind about what you told us yesterday about certain conditions of teachers doing the janitor work. Was that at Randolph School? 402 A. That was in Randolph School in 1947-1948, Your Honor, and in all the outlying schools. The Court: Well, why did you have the teachers doing the janitor service? A. The students had strewn paper and other rubbish all over the school grounds and the teachers apparently made no attempt to have it picked up or cleaned up and the janitor who was employed at that time couldn’t keep it cleaned up, so I had them clean it up. The Court: I see. Were they men or women? A. Part of them were men and part of them were women. The Court: Do you mean just the yard, or did they have to scrub the floors of the school? A. No. They didn’t scrub the floors. They just picked up the paper and swept the class rooms out and cleaned them up. Q. But at this time you have two full time janitors for the Randolph School? A. I do. The Court: Do you have colored men at the white school as janitors, or are they white? 403 A. They are white, Your Honor. Q. Now you were asked yesterday afternoon about this barn and the stock on the edge of the playground at the Hermes School. Is that stock owned by the students or by the School District? A. The stock is owned by the students. Q. On Plaintiff’s Exhibit 38, you were asked yester day as to the item on the side where you list teachers’ homes, $10,000.00. Will you tell me what that inventory covers? A. That covers two homes. One of them is the home which I live in, and the other is the home in which the white vocational agriculture teacher lives in. Q. How were those buildings acquired? A. They were given to the School District. Q. By whom? A. They built the house in which I live—it was given to the School District by a club, I believe it was the Ateria Club. And the one in which the vocational agricul ture teacher lives was given by Mr. William Hermes. Q. Do you pay rent for your house? A. I do not. Q- Is that a part of your compensation? A. Yes, it is. Q. Is the other house given to a teacher or teachers, or is it rented to them? A. It is rented to him. Q. Now, the Court has asked you something about the extent of the District and on yesterday afternoon, in interrogating you, you were asked how far the students at Ellinger were carried by bus to the Randolph School, and I believe you stated eleven miles. Are there other areas in the district that require the transportation of students by bus for as much as that distance? A. Yes, there are. 404 Q. And are both white and colored children carried that distance? A. They are. Q. I will ask you if the buses supplied by the LaGrange Independent School District are equal and uniform as to the white and colored children? A. Yes, they are. Q. Now is the Winchester area in the LaGrange In dependent School District? A. It is. Q. And about what is that distance in to the downtown plant? A. From the further side or the back side of the Win chester district, it is approximately sixteen or eighteen miles to the downtown plant. Q. Are both colored and white children brought in by bus to that area? A. Yes, they are. The Court: Do you remember offhand how many children there are at Winchester? That is north of the river, isn’t it? A. Yes, sir. That is across the river from West Point. We run two buses out there, one white bus and one colored bus and they bring between thirty-eight and forty-five in each bus. The Court: Where is it across the river? A. They don’t cross the river because the school is on the same side of the river that Winchester is on 405 The Court: West Point is on the other side of the river, isn’t it? A. Yes, sir. Q. Now in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 38, on yesterday you were asked about the item on Line 2 under Column 1, the $2,000.00 figure. What does that represent? A. That represents elementary playgrounds which is a part of the consolidated or annexed school district, the outlying school districts which have been consolidated into the LaGrange plant. Q. Does it represent a purchase? A. No, it does not. Q. On yesterday you were asked about the item of $188,000.00 which appears on Line 1 as being the poperty of the white school area. I will ask you if that includes plants other than the plant within the downtown area? A. Yes, it does. Q. On Line 10 of the same exhibit, you were asked about the $500.00 item under visual aid. I will ask you what that is. A. That is a motion picture projector which we used in the white school. Q. Who purchased that? A. The Parent-Teachers Association. Q. The white Parent-Teachers Association. A. Yes. Q. They gave it to the school? A. Yes. Q. Now on Line 1 you were asked about this figure $85,000.00 in Column 7 of Page 11 of Exhibit 38. I will ask you what that table includes? A. That includes the negro high school building and plant. Q. As re-done as shown by Defendants’ Exhibit 1? 406 A. Yes. Q. Are there any funds omitted from the $85,000.00 total? A. In my opinion there is another figure that should be added to that. Q. And what is that? A. When the old building was built, the one which ap pears behind the front of this new building, it was built on a PWA work project and the old superintendent’s report only carried $8,000.00 which was just the material and did not include the labor and which was never entered on the books. Q. So to that extent, the figure is short? A. Yes. It is in error. Q. How much should be added to that figure, roughly? A. I would judge $25,000.00 or $20,000.00. Q. You were asked on yesterday about Item No. 1 on Line 8, cost of equipment. Do any of those items across Line 8, either in Column 1 or in Column 7, include any books? A. No, they do not. This includes the furniture and fixtures, the chairs and the tables, the filing cabinets and the card indexes for the library. Q. I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, if the library here that you have at the Randolph School has been approved by the State Board of Education? A. It has. Q. Has it been approved by any other authorities? A. Yes, it has. Q. What other authority? A. It has been designated as a demonstration library for the colored schools in Texas. Q. And who so designated it? A. The State Supervisor for Colored School Libraries at Prairie View College. 407 Q. How many such demonstration libraries are there in Texas? A. There are only four. Q. Mr. Lemmons, how many people are there on the LaGrange Independent School Board? A. Seven. Q. How is that Board selected? A. It is a seven-member Board and the members— Q. Well, I don’t mean the mechanics of getting them on as to the—I am asking how they got on the Board? A. The are elected— Q. They are elected? A. —by the people. Q. How often is the election held? A. There is an election held each year on the first Saturday in April. At that time they are elected by regular voting procedure. Q. And who votes in that election? A. All the qualified voters in the LaGrange Indepen dent School District are eligible to vote. Q. And who can run for membership on the board? A. Any qualified voter within the district. Q. In these elections do the negro qualified voters of the LaGrange Independent School District vote? A. They do. Q. Now on yesterday the Court asked you in reference to the graduation, as I recall, and you testified some eleven students graduated from the negro high school, the Ran dolph High School, and at the white high school there were some thirty-five or thirty-nine. Did you look up the figures so you could tell the Court approximately how many of those students went to college? A. Approximately thirty-five per cent of the white students went on to college and I believe all of the colored students except one or two went to college. 408 The Court: What year was that? A. That is the past year. Q. Wait, Mr. Lemmons. Do you mean this past school year, or the past calendar year? A. Past school year. The Court: That is the year closing in May or June of this year? A. Yes, sir. The Court: Give me those figures again. Thirty-five per cent of the white graduates went on to college and all the negro students? A. All except one or two. I asked the Principal this morning and he told me all except the one. The Court: Is it encouraged in the school that the student should go to college? A. Yes, Your Honor. The Court: Both schools, white and negro? A. Yes, Your Honor. Q. I hand you, Mr. Lemmons, Defendants’ Exhibits 32 and 6. 409 Mr. McGregor: I will admit, Your Honor, this is a little bit repetitous but there is an omission here I think should be cleared up. Q. On that exhibit, Mr. Lemmons, I see a room on the right-hand side in the portion of the old wing, what seems to be a room, and I will ask you if it has a partition in it similar to the one over on the left-hand side? A. Yes, it does. Q. So there is one in there, one extra room over on that side rather than are now shown? A. Yes, sir. Q. I will ask you, Mr. Lemmons, if you would take your pen and draw a line across that exhibit at approximately where that partition is so that the exhibit will be a true representation as to the number of rooms in the school plant. A. (The witness complied.) Mr. McGregor: Now, I reoffer Exhibit 32. Q. There is one other omission and I think I can ask you without the exhibit. In testifying in reference to the gymnasium at the Randolph School, I believe you testified that there was heat in the dressing room and the showers and the toilet facilities. I will ask you if in the present rooms at the gymnasium of the white school there is heat in those quarters? A. No, there is not. Q. I believe you testified that on the site of the Hermes and the white high school plant there is some two or three hundred feet between the place now used for the white high school and the Hermes plant? A. Yes, there is between four and six hundred feet. 410 Q. Oh, between four and six hundred feet. And I believe you testified that the students from the high school had to go over to the Hermes plant for their lunches? A. Yes, sir. Q. Is there a covered walkway between the premises? A. No, there is not. Mr. McGregor: No further questions. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, I have just one or two questions. Re-Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. Mr. Lemmons, there is no school for either colored or white in the Winchester District? A. No. Both of those schools have been abolished. Q. They have been abolished and there is no school? A. Yes. Q. Now in the Ellinger school area no white pupil in the grades taught in that school out there is required to go to LaGrange. That is true? A. No, they are not required. Q. Only negro students? A. Yes. Q. The white students, they are required to go to the high school? A. Yes. Q. Now, over in Warda no white pupil who is below the fourth grade is required to make the trip? A. No. Q. But all negro students below the fourth grade are required to make the trip? 411 A. Yes. Q. Now there is one other question. You stated that there should be $25,000.00 added to the value given to the negro school. Now you said that you have got an $8,000.00 charge there on the material? A. Yes. Q. And the work was done by the WPA? A. Yes. Q. And that was not any money for the labor spent by the School Board, that was spent by the Government? A. No. That was spent by the Government. Q. And you think that expenditure by the Government should be added to that figure as an expenditure? A. I am of the opinion, in my opinion, I think it should be. The Court: Why do you maintain these schools at Ellinger and Warda and why haven’t you closed those like you have Winchester and West Point? A. Your Honor, the State Law requires that the aver age daily attendance in one of these outlying elementary schools must fall twenty children in average daily attend ance for one year before you close them and that has not occurred as yet. Now the average daily attendance in Warda is about seventeen and five-tenths children for the first five months. In Ellinger, of course, it is higher, but probably Warda will be closed next year. The Court: I see. Then in these other places like Winchester you are permitted under the State Law to close them because of the drop in attendance? A. Yes, sir. 412 Mr. McGregor: There was one other question. Re-Cross Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. I think I asked you, Mr. Lemmons, on yesterday, two or three questions about the teachers that I omitted ask ing about just now. I asked you, Mr. Lemmons, on yester day, I think, to bring to the Court this morning the aver age pay on a comparative basis between the teachers in the white portion of the school and the Randolph School as of this year. A. As of this year the average pay for the white teachers in the LaGrange school system is $2,856.06. For the colored school, it is $2,913.18. Q. Was there any other analytical data that I asked you to bring? The Court: Just a minute. I didn’t get that. What do you mean by average pay? A. By taking the total payroll to all of the white teach ers and dividing by the number of white teachers teaching. Then take the total payroll to the colored teachers and dividing it by the number of colored teachers teaching. The Court: That gives the white how much? A. $2,856.06, and for the colored, it is $2,913.18. The Court: Well, now, that is strictly teachers. That doesn’t include janitors or anything like that? 413 A. It does not include janitors or my salary or any body except classroom teachers. Q. Now was there any other statistical data I asked you for? A. I believe that is all. The Court: Are you through with the witness now? Mr. Durham: In view of those questions I have got to ask one more, if the Court will permit. Re-Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. During the school year 1948-1949, what was the aver age salary for whites? A. I do not know. These figures do not reflect the average. Q. I will ask you this question. What was the highest salary paid? That is on Page 12, Exhibit 38. What was the highest salary paid a white teacher? A. $3,696.00. Q. What was the highest salary paid a negro teacher? A. $3,655.00. Mr. Durham: That is all, Your Honor. The Court: Are you through with this witness? Mr. Durham: We are through with him. 414 The Court: All right. You may call your next witness. Mr. Durham: I think we can finish with him this morning. The Court: We will recess at 12:00, but maybe you will have time to ask him some questions. JULIUS BROWN, was recalled as a witness in behalf of the plaintiff and testified further as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. Your name is Julius Brown? A. Yes, sir. Q. You testified the first day this case started? A. Yes, sir. Q1, Now who was the Principal of the colored school, Randolph School, in LaGrange in September, 1947? A. Professor Collins. Q. Now did you talk to Mr. Collins about chemistry for your child before the school started? A. I did. Q. What did he say? A. Professor Collins told me— Mr. McGregor: I object to that as hearsay. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, the testimony here shows that the Principal was appointed— 415 The Court: I will hear it. Objection overruled. Mr. McGregor: Exception. A. Professor Collins told me he was able to teach chemistry but they did not have sufficient to teach it with. Q. He told you your child could or could not get it? A. He told me she could get it but they didn’t have sufficient. He stated they didn’t have sufficient things to accomplish their needs. That was my understanding. Mr. McGregor: I move this question be stricken. The Court: I will hear it. Mr. McGregor: Note our exception. Q. Now I will ask you if Mr. Collins left the school without saying anything about why he left? Did he finally leave the school after it opened? A. Yes, sir, he did. Q. Was that before you went to Mr. Lemmons on the fifth of December? A. He left before I went to Mr. Lemmons on the fifth of December. Q. After he left, you then went to Mr. Lemmons? A. I went to Mr. Lemmons. Mr. Durham: That is all, Your Honor. 416 Mr. McGregor: No questions. The Court: Stand aside. Mr. Durham: We have got one more, and if the Court wants to hear him now we may get through with him. The Court: Bring him in. Have you been sworn? Mr. Farris: Yes, sir. WILLIAM N. FARRIS, was called as a witness in behalf of the plaintiff and, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. Durham: Q. What are your initials, Mr. Farris? A. William N. Q. Where do you live? A. Houston, Texas. The Court: How do you spell that name? A. F-a-r-r-i-s. Q. Were you ever employed in LaGrange, Texas? 417 A. Yes, I was. Q. By whom were you employed? A. The Superintendent. Q. That is Mr. C. A. Lemmons? A. That is right. Q. Was that in the Randolph Colored School? A. It was. Q. In what capacity? A. As the Principal. Q. When did you start work there? A. September 1, 1948. Q. When did you resign? A. The latter part of January, 1949. Q. 1949. Did you resign of your own accord? A. Yes, I did. Q. After you left the school, where did you go to work? A. Here in Houston. Q. In what capacity? A. As a postal clerk in the Post Office Department. Q. Now have you had any high school training? A. Yes, I have. Q. What high school training? A. Four years of academic training at the Denison Colored School. Q. Is that an accredited high school? A. Yes, sir. Q. What college training have you had? A. Four years of standard courses at Prairie View Industrial College. Q. At the time you went to the Randolph High School as the Principal in the LaGrange District, are you familiar with what was in the room designated as the laboratory, when you first went there? A. Yes, sir. Q. What was that? A. There wasn’t anything by the way of a laboratory. 418 Q. Are you familiar now with what was there when you left in January, this year, 1949? A. When I left? Q. Yes. A. Yes, I am. Q. What was that? A. They had ordered and delivered about $600.00 worth of glassware to be used in the laboratory. They had ordered approximately thirty some odd chairs with the hand-arm rest. I was on some charts for biological de monstration. That is as far as I can go. Q. Thank you. Was anything else in the laboratory when you left there in January, as Principal, 1949, ex cept what you have testified about? A. Not that I recall. Q. Now did you make a written requisition to Mr. Lemmons, the Superintendent, for supplies and equipment for the laboratory in the negro school in LaGrange? Mr. McGregor: I object to that unless it is confined to some particular time. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, I am showing that Mr. Lemmons, if I followed his testimony right, said that the negro supplies and equipment were furnished for the asking and they kept no record of it. The Court: I will hear it. Objection overruled. Q. Did you deliver that written requisition or request to Mr. Lemmons? A. In person. Q. In person. Now, what did you ask for? 419 The Court: When was this? Q. About when was that, Farris, when you talked to Mr. Lemmons and delivered the written request? A. I cannot recall the exact date but some time after the school session started in the early part of the year. Q. You don’t know the date. It was the early part of the session? The Court: What session do you mean? September, 1948? A. 1948-1949. Q. What did you request for the laboratory in the negro school, as near as you can remember? Mr. McGregor: I object to that. The request itself would be the best evidence. The Court: I think it would. Mr. Durham: We have requested it before, and we make the request again that it be produced. Mr. McGregor: I don’t recall any denial of any request, Your Honor. Mr. Durham: I may be mistaken, but I think Mr. Lemmons testified that in the negro school there was no written record kept on it and all they had, all they did, the Principal 420 asked for it, and he sent it down. This man was the Principal, and— The Court: The matter I am ruling on is that if there was a written request, it is the best evidence, but if there wasn’t, why, then— Mr. McGregor: I understood the witness to testify he made a written request. The Court: I think that would be the best evidence. Mr. Durham: Do you have a copy of the original? A. I left all my records in LaGrange with the Super intendent who succeeded me. Q. Do you know whether you can get a copy of it now? The Court: If it is here among all those papers, why, of course, I want them to produce it. I am going to recess until 2:00 o’clock, and you can have it looked up. The Court will recess until 2:00 o’clock. (Recessed at 12:00 o’clock noon.) Afternoon Session 2:00 p. m. The Court: Be seated, gentlemen. 421 Mr. McGregor: Before the plaintiff rests, Your Honor, I want to tender Dr. Boelsch, the President of the School Board, the Assis tant Secretary, and Mr. Baumbach, the Secretary, if they desire to use them. They are here in Court. The Court: All right, you may proceed. WILLIAM N. FARRIS, resumed the stand and testified further as follows: Direct Examination (continued.) By Mr. Durham: Q:. I believe you testified this morning that you started working as Principal in the LaGrange Independent School District, and Principal of the Randolph Colored School in September, 1948? A. That is correct. Q. Will you tell the Court what was in the room that was designated as the library in the Randolph Colored School, LaGrange Independent School District, when you went there? A. There wasn’t anything in there. Q. Were any volumes put in there after you went there? A. Yes, there were. Q. What was put in there, Mr. Farris, please, sir? A. I recall at least two sets of World Encyclopedia and at least two full volumes of dictionaries. Q. Now when you left there in January, 1949, this year, had any additional volumes been put in that room designated for the library? 422 A. Not that I recall. Q. Will you tell the Court what was in the room used and designated for teaching vocational agriculture when you went to the school in September, 1948? A. Some ordinary desks and a few hammers and saws and miscellaneous tools. Q. When you left in January, 1949, what had been added, if anything? A. None that I know of. Q. Did you graduate in a high school in the State of Texas? A. Yes, I did. Q. Was it a separate or segregated high school? A. Yes, it was. Q. Where was it located? A. At Denison, Texas. Q. Did you take science and particularly the subjects of physics or chemistry in your high school work? A. I took physics. Q. Was that school equipped with a laboratory for teaching science? A. It was. Mr. McGregor: I don’t see how that is relevant to any issue in this case. It is going far afield. The Court: What do you say to the objection? Mr. Durham: Your Honor, my position is that here is a man who was trained in the schools with a laboratory. Without getting opinion evidence I think the testimony, if the Court will permit me, and which I think the witness 423 will answer, that he got his training in a high school with a laboratory better than the one that was provided here, and that he got water, heat, and the chemical tables and— The Court: I will hear it. Objection overruled. Mr. McGregor: Note my exception. Q. In the high school at Denison, did they have running water? A. No, they didn’t. Q. Did they have regular chemical tables for experi ments? A. No, they didn’t. Q. Brunson burners? A. Yes. Q. After you left high school, did you continue your studies in college? A. Yes, I did. Q. Did you continue in science and especially the sub jects of chemistry or physics? A. In both. Q. In what school did you pursue your college work? A. Prairie View. Q. Did the Prairie View Institute have a chemical laboratory? A. Yes, they did. Q. Was it equipped with the usual tables that are used in the science laboratories? A. Yes, they were. Q. Did they have running water? A. Yes, they did. Q. Did they have Brunson burners? A. Yes. 424 Q. Test tubes? A. Yes. Q. Now in your effort at study and understanding those subjects were you benefited by having running water, regular laboratory tables, Brunson burners; were you bet ter able to understand the subject? A. Yes, sir. Q. Was it of any benefit, such a laboratory as I have asked you about that they had in Prairie View, in con nection with your subjects over the type you had in the high school? A. Yes, it was. Q. Now as a teacher, in your opinion, does a laboratory with running water, Brunson burners, laboratory tables, test tubes, have any educational value to the student studying chemistry or physics? A. It does. Mr. McGregor: Your Honor, that is repetitious. It has all been gone into with Mr. Lemmons. He testified it was of benefit. The evidence shows it is in the process of being installed in the school there. It seems to me this is just extending the evidence. The Court: I will hear it. Objection overruled. Mr. Durham: You may have the witness. Cross Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. Where do you live now, Mr. Farris? A. Houston, Texas. 425 Q. And you have lived here, have you, since you left the Principal’s office at LaGrange, Texas? A. I have. Q. You were in the Randolph School when you were there? A. I was. Q. Were you the Principal of not only the high school section but the grammar school section, too? A. I was, insofar as I know. The Court: What is the answer? A. I was, insofar as I know. Q. Was the grammar school section being taught at Randolph at the time that you were there? A. It was. Q. How many grades or classes did you have there at the time? A. From the first through the twelfth grade. Q. And do you know how many students there were together in the school while you were there? A. I can only approximate it. Q. What is your rough estimate of it? A. About 425. Q. Do you know how many there are now? A. No, I don’t. Q. When you were the Principal of that school you had the duty of collecting the library fees, did you? A. No, I didn’t. Q. Did you ever make any effort to collect library fees? A. No, I haven’t. Q. Were you told it was your duty to collect them? A. No. 426 Q. Nobody told you that was your duty? A. No, they didn’t. Q. Did you collect the fines for the keeping of books overtime? A. I have not collected them. The Court: He did not come until September, 1948, did he? A. No, sir. Mr. McGregor: That is right. The Court: I thought the School Superintendent testified that was done away with before that time, that dollar. Mr. McGregor: Your Honor is correct. I was a year off. Q. You are now employed by the Postal Department, you say? A. Yes, I am. Q. Did you take a Civil Service Examination for that position? A. I did. Q. When did you take it? A. December, 1947. Q. In December, 1947. Where? A. In Houston, Texas. Q. When did you file your first application for it? A. I don’t recall the exact date. Q. Was it some six months or a year before? A. Maybe. 427 Q. I see. Had you planned for some time to take that examination? A. Only when it was announced. Q. Well, do you recall when it was announced that you could file your application for it? A. No, I don’t. Q. Well, you say it was some six months or a year before you took it? A. I didn’t say it was a year. I said it was some time before I don’t know how long. Mr. McGregor: That is all. Mr. Durham: That is all. The Court: Stand aside. Mr. Durham: Plaintiffs rest, Your Honor. Mr. McGregor: At this time, Your Honor, we move for judgment on the pleadings as submitted and on the evidence that is in, on the grounds that: One, there is no plaintiff shown here qualified to maintain such a class suit that is here filed. Because there has been a failure to show sufficient in terest and an adequate representation of the class. And for the additional reason that the main plaintiff has not resided in the particular locality for more than two years. 428 As an additional ground for the motion for judgment, at this time, we move that the Court enter judgment for and in default of having a real plaintiff with a substantial interest for the application of declaratory judgment. For the reason it is shown clearly, we think, by the proof, that there was not a suitable and timely application for the course of which the student was alleged to have been deprived and that it must be obvious from the evi dence that the case is therefore a moot case in a situation which has been supplied as a predicate for the case. The third proposition, we move for judgment on the ground that the plaintiffs evidence, if the plaintiff is properly before the Court, wholly fails to show that there is any substantial inequality in the educational facilities furnished for the negro children in the LaGrange Indepen dent School District. The Court: I will take the motion with the case. Mr. McGregor: Call Mr. Baumbach. ALVIN BAUMBACH, was called as a witness in be half of the defendants and, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. Your name, please, for the Court. A. Alvin Baumbach. 429 The Court: How do you spell your name? A. B-a-u-m-b-a-c-h. Q. Where do you reside? A. At Halstead. Q. Is that in Fayette County? A. Yes, it is in Fayette County, about six miles east of LaGrange. Q. Is that in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. It is. Q. Where were you born, Mr. Baumbach? A. In Fayette County, near Fayetteville, Texas. Q. Have you lived in Fayette County all your life? A. Yes, except in 1917, I was out of the county. Q. Where were you then? A. In the Army. Q. What is your present business or occupation other than being on the School Board of the LaGrange Indepen dent School District? A. Merchant. Q. Do you have an establishment or a place of business where you conduct your merchandising business? A. I have. Q. Where is it? A. Halstead, Texas. Q. Where is that, in reference to what highway it may be on? A. It is about a quarter of a mile off of Highway 71. Q. And what town or village is it close to? A. Well, LaGrange is the closest. Q. And is LaGrange on the east or the west side? A. West side. Q. And what is the first town to the east? A. Ellinger. 430 Q, Ellinger has one of the schools that are in the LaGrange Independent School District? A. That is right. Q. When did you first run for a position on the La- Grange Independent School District? A. I had been appointed to fill an unexpired term in 1945, and I think it lasted one and a half years. And the next April, I had been elected. Q. Next April, you had what? A. I don’t remember. It would be three years now, next April, that I have been elected to the position. I mean, as a Trustee. Q. In other words, you have first had an appointed term and then you— A. Run for re-election. Q. You were re-elected? A. That is right. Q. When was the present improvement program, that is to say, what year was the present improvement pro gram actually begun, or when did it have its inception in the Board? A. The Minutes show it, but I just exactly don’t know. Q. Would you like to look at the Minutes for the purpose of refreshing your recollection on the date? A. Yes. There was an old building at the colored school which was a fire hazard. Two-story building. We had a condemnation suit to get that away from the pre sent school site. That was July, 1946. The Court: What happened in July, 1946? A. That is when the suit was brought to get an old building away from the colored school. It was a fire hazard. An old wooden building we had to clear out and 431 get more grounds for the school. Q. In other words, you began the improvement pro gram on the colored school by removing an old building from the grounds? A. That is right. Q. Did the District already own the old building? A. You mean the School District? Q. Yes. A. No. Q. Did they own the grounds that building was on? A. No, sir. Q. Did you have that condemnation suit? A. Yes. Q. Did you acquire the old building and the grounds? A. Yes, we did. Q. Is it the grounds that are now a part of the Ran dolph School grounds? A. It is. Q. Now, were the present buildings in the improve ment program financed through any special means of fin ancing? A. I don’t quite understand. Q. Well, now did you get the money to go ahead with the program? A. Bond issue. Q. And do you recall what date you first considered the bond issue in the Board? A. The Minutes show it. I just can’t recall. Q. Would you like to refresh your recollection on that? A. Yes. On May 12, 1947, sir. Q. And was it decided at that time to begin the im provement program? A. It was. Q. Now after you decided that, did you take any steps with financial people to issue the bonds? A. We did. 432 Q. Were there later on further steps in reference to this bond issue? A. I think there was. We had the bond people come over. Q. Would you refresh your recollection as to the next meeting in which the bonding people appeared? A. November 12, 1947. Q. Now was it necessary to have an election to pass these bonds? A. It was. Q. When was the first step taken in reference to hav ing the election to pass the bond issue? A. In January, the thirteenth, 1947—1948. Q. Now did you have further conversations with bond ing representatives? A. Yes, sir. Q. I will ask you to refresh your recollection as to what date that was? A. January 14. Q. What year? A. 1948. Q. Now was there such an election, that is, bond elec tion ordered? A. It was. Q. Would you refresh your recollection as to the date it was ordered? A. On January 15, 1948. Q. Was the bond issue passed? A. It was. Q. Then after the passage of the bond issue were any steps taken by the board to improve the school facilities? A. It was. Q. Was one of those first steps the employment of an architect? A. That is right. 433 Q. Can you tell us about the date? A. April 8, 1948. Q. Now can you tell us about when the architect’s plans and specifications were accepted A. On September 21, 1948. Q. After the acceptance of the plans and specifications, was the contract let? A. It was. Q. You have heard this testimony about the con struction. Was that the result of this contract? A. It was. Q. I will ask you, Mr. Baumbach, if the School Board that you are now on is the same one that started this improvement program? * A. It is. Q. Has there been any change in the membership? A. One, maybe, or so. Q. A new member, or— A. Let me see. Yes. It is one new member. Q. One new member? A. Yes. Q:. Has the policy of the Board to continue these im provements in the LaGrange Independent School District remained the same since 1946 to the present time? A. It has, and it is still continuing. Q. What is the policy of the present board in refer ence to the maintenance and preservation of that policy? A. Same thing, to improve, for the improvement. Q. There were many improvements needed in the District, weren’t there? A. That is right, and there are still some needed. Mr. McGregor: Take the witness. Cross Examination By Mr. Durham: Q. Mr. Baumbach, at each of these meetings you say you discussed the bond issue. Did you discuss a bond issue for the construction of the elementary school for whites? A. Well, all of it was discussed. Q. They were all discussed. It was not necessarily bonds for the negro school, it was for the purpose of im proving the District? A. For the purpose of improving the School District. Q. Now you say your policy has at all times been to improve the school facilities? A. That is right. Q. And is it your policy in the future to improve the school facilities in the LaGrange Independent School Dis trict on the same pattern you have been improving them since you have been Trustee? A. Yes, to improve. Mr. Durham: That is all. Mr. McGregor: That is all. The Court: Stand aside. Mr. McGregor: Come around for a minute, Mr. Lemmons. 435 C. A. LEMMONS, was called as a witness in behalf of the defendants and, having been duly sworn, testified as follows: Direct Examination. By Mr. McGregor: Q. Mr. Lemmons, in reference to testimony of yours here this morning on the salaries, you gave a top salary in the white school of some $3,000.00. Was that a teacher’s salary, or your salary? A. That was my salary. Q. And I believe that was for the school year 1948-1949? A. Yes, I believe so. Q. The averages that you gave me between the school teachers in the Randolph School and in the other schools in LaGrange was an average based on the salaries being paid this year? A. Yes, that is correct. Q. And when I say “this year” I mean the school year 1948-1949. Is that what you intended to mean in your answer? A. No. I meant the salaries that are being paid now for the school year 1949-1950. Mr. McGregor: All right. That is all. Cross Examination. By Mr. Durham: G. Mr. Lemmons, the school year 1949-1950 is the first school year that started operating under the Gilmer- Aiken Bill? A. Yes. 436 Q. And under that law it is mandatory that teachers be paid similar salaries based upon experience and tenure? A. Yes. The same provisions are contained in the law we operated on last year, known as the Equalization Law, and they were then paid on experience and tenure. Mr. Durham: That is all. The Court: Stand aside. Mr. McGregor: Defendants rest and would like to renew their motion. The Court: The motion will be taken with the case. Mr. Durham: Plaintiffs rest, Your Honor. The Court: Do you gentlemen want to argue the case? Mr. Durham: Your Honor, if the Court desires argument, we can present the Court memorandum briefs, if the Court agrees, in order to preserve the time of the Court. We have taken up considerable time. The Court: I was going to leave that to counsel, whatever counsel prefer. 437 Mr. Durham: In view of the time taken, Your Honor, it is my view that we should present memorandum briefs instead of taking up further time of the Court. The Court: What is your position? Mr. McGregor: Will the Court give me just a second? The Court: All right. Mr. McGregor: Defendants waive argument. The Court: How long before you can present briefs? Mr. Durham: Your Honor, if the Court can give me about eight days, I have got a matter, I am compelled to go to trial in the State Court on Monday in Dallas. I hope to be through Wednesday, and I will start right on the brief. The Court: How much time do you need? Mr. McGregor: Well, I had rather not start on mine until I get the plaintiff’s. I will get up my skeleton but I would like to have not less than five days after I get his. 438 The Court: In view of the Holidays intervening, I would just as soon give you until the first of January. Mr. Durham: I will appreciate it. Mr. McGregor: I will have mine ready then, but can I have the five days, Your Honor. The Court: How long before you can get yours in? Mr. Durham: I can give Mr. McGregor a copy of mine within two weeks. The Court: That will be all right. Briefs to be submitted January 1. On that point, I was just thinking. Ordinarily, I can re member testimony sufficiently to decide a case unless it is a case such as we have here. For instance, I did not make any memorandum, and I have not any way of check ing up on those figures, checking which of those figures is which. Of course, the record shows that. Another thing, there is a good deal of evidence about the condition of one school and the facilities of another. I was just wondering whether I ought not to have the record written up. Mr. McGregor: Would Your Honor like to hear this case argued? I can’t help but have the feeling the Court wants to hear this case argued? 439 The Court: No, no. I will take it on briefs. Mr. McGregor: We will agree to split the costs of the record if the Court wants it written up. Mr. Durham: We will agree, Your Honor. The Court: I will make this notation then. Submitted, briefs by January 1, next, 1950. The record will be written up, costs taxed fifty-fifty. Mr. Durham: Your Honor, may I inquire of the Court that the ex hibits might be attached in original form? The Court: Yes, put the exhibits in the record. Mr. McGregor: Now, inasmuch as there is going to be this factual delineation I will have to wait until I get plaintiff’s brief. I think I can do it in five days, but I might want to ask the Court for a few days more because I have cases set every week. The Court: I want to suggest to counsel on both sides that we have some briefing rules in the District which may not seem to counsel to be important, but they are of a great deal of importance to the Judge when he goes to read the briefs. I suggest you get a copy from the rules and you will find 440 some new ones in the Clerk’s office, and you can follow the outline of the briefs. It is very much like a Circuit Court of Appeals case. Mr. Durham: If the rules require a reference to the page of the re cord— The Court: No, it does not. Mr. Durham: Well, I was thinking I might have to ask the indulgence of the Court until I get this record, if it requires that. The Court: No, it does not require that. The rules require you to state your preposition of law, your facts, and then point out what the witnesses said, if you like. In fact, I am carrying everything in my mind except the details of what the situation is in the chemistry room in one place, and one room in another place. There is so much of it, I haven’t got it in my mind, but I will get it from the record. All right. The Court will adjourn. (Adjourned at 2:30 p. m.) 441 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. (Filed February 17, 1950.) (Title Omitted.) Statement of the Case: Plaintiff, a negro, claiming to be a citizen of the United States, and a resident domiciled in La Grange, Fayette County, Texas, in this District and Division, and living within the LaGrange Independent School District, and claiming to be a property owner and taxpayer in said County and School District, and the father of two children entitled to attend the free pub lic schools of such District, brings this suit for him self and on behalf of others similarly situated, against Defendants, complaining of discrimination against the negro school children or pupils of the District in the matter of school facilities. He claims that there is jurisdiction here under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and under the Judicial Code. He prays for Declaratory Judgment and for Permanent Injunction, restraining Defen dants from further discrimination. Defendants have answered, setting forth that Plain tiff does not have sufficient interest in the subject matter of the suit to entitle him, or any of the class he represents, to any relief here. Defendants also say that the Constitution and Statutes of Texas re quire the establishment, maintainance, and opera tion of separate schools for negro children and white 442 children; that there is no discrimination in the oper ation and maintainence of the schools of such Dis trict; and that the separate schools operated and maintained for the negro children are substantially equal to those maintained and operated for white children. After careful consideration of the evidence offered and in the light of the Law applicable, I find for De fendants. Missouri v. Canada, 305 U. S. 339. Sipuel v. Oklahoma, 332 U. S. 631. Findings of Fact: (a) The Defendant, LaGrange Independent School District, was established in Fayette County, Texas, in this District and Division, by virtue of a Special Act of the Texas Legislature, effective April 2, 1921. Such Act was designed to, and does, give to such District, its Trustees, and other officers, certain privileges and powers, and prescribes certain duties. All point to a material and permanent improvement of the public schools of the District. Reference is made to such Act. New territory has from time to time been added to that described in the Act until at the time of this trial a large area of Fayette County was included in such District, with LaGrange the central point. (b) One of the first plans or movements was to gradually abolish all the smaller schools of the Dis trict, and to establish two large and efficient schools in LaGrange, one for the white pupils and one for the negro pupils, and to daily transport the pupils to and from these two schools by bus. This is being done 443 by many similar Districts in Texas. This plan has been carried out, except that there is still a school for white elementary pupils at Warda and another for white elementary pupils at Ellinger. The evidence with respect to such centralization plan shows no discrimination against the negro pu pils. Negroes and whites have had and are having the same treatment. (c) All of the negro pupils of the LaGrange Inde pendent School District now attend the Randolph School, a combined High School and Elementary School situated in the town of LaGrange. This school is constructed of masonary. It is of the one story type and is fireproof. The original portion of this building was erected in 1934 or 1935, and the additions were completed in 1949. Certain fittings and furnish ings of the addition, landscaping and sidewalks re main to be added, but the plant is substantially com plete. Except in size, this building compares favor ably with and is as good and useful as the buildings used by the white pupils. The difference in size is due to there being more white pupils than negro pupils. (d) Each grade at Randolph School has a sepa rate classroom, a teacher, as we do the school for the white pupils. They have the same electric lighting, good “ day-lighting,” adequate and approved seat- ings, and comparable (although in part different) heating as the school for white pupils. The gymnasium is constructed of the best materials and is modern. In fact, the Randolph School Plant is modern and of the latest design, and as stated is as good as the 444 building used in LaGrange for the white pupils. It is far superior to the buildings and equipment used by the white pupils at Warda and Ellinger. I am not impressed that Plaintiffs complaint with respect to the open corridors is meritorious. Whatever differ ence there may be as to the value of the respective sites and buildings therein arises in part by reason of their distance from the center of the town. (e) The faculty of the Randolph School is com posed of teachers with a higher rating than those in the white schools. It has an average pay scale higher than the white schools, and a student load less than the white schools. The student load is 20.1 child per teacher in the negro school and 22.6 child per teacher in the white schools. (f) The curriculum of the Randolph School is that prescribed and required by the State with the same electives studies or subjects submitted to the negro pupils as those submitted to the white pupils. The only negro child shown to have been denied an elec tive study or subject was the daughter of the Plain tiff in this case who applied for chemistry (not a re quired subject) on December 5, 1947, too late for such a class to be organized for that year. Whatever delay there was in giving the negro pupils the right to take the elective studies was due to the fact that the negro school is delayed in getting started two to three weeks every year because of the negroes leav ing the county and returning late—probably follow ing cotton picking work. (g) The white pupils have a better library than the negroes. The libraries of the District first became 445 supported by the public funds of the School District in the School Year 1948-1949 and the Randolph School has been receiving its proportionate share of additions since that time. It is equipped with the usual book shelves and a teacher with a check out desk. Previous to the school year 1948-1949, the respective libraries were maintained by donations from individuals, par ent teachers associations, and there were few dona tions to the negro schools. Also by fines and a fee of $1.00 per pupil which ordinarily were not collected at the negro school. (h) The entrance requirements, the teaching sys tem, the examinations, the graduation, and all other similar requirements of the negro schools and white schools are not only substantially equal but are iden tical. (i) Further discussion would unduly prolong these findings. It is sufficient to say that while the two schools (negro and white) are not identical and while the white schools may excel in some respects and the negro schools may excel in some respects, they are substantially equal. The disposition of the school au thorities is shown by the evidence to be to continue to improve the schools for both races. Conclusions of Law: 1:—The establishment, maintainance, and opera tion of separate schools for negro pupils and white pupils in the LaGrange Independent School District is not unlawful under the Constitution and other Laws 446 of the State of Texas, nor does it violate the provi sions of Amendment XIV to the Constitution of the United States. 2:—The separate schools maintained for the negro pupils in the LaGrange Independent School District are substantially equal to the schools maintained for white pupils. In fact, the schools maintained at LaGrange in such District for the negro pupils are superior to those maintained at Warda and Ellinger for the white pupils. 3:—While the matter is not free from doubt, I think that Plaintiff in this case has shown sufficient interest to permit him to prosecute this suit and to represent others similarly situated in the LaGrange Independent School District. I think the Court should be liberal in its holdings in this kind of a suit. 4:—Plaintiff is not entitled to an Injunction, but Declaratory Judgment will enter in accordance with these Findings and Conclusions. T. M. KENNERLY, Judge. 447 FINAL DECREE. (Filed March 7, 1950.) In The District Court Of The United States For The Southern District Of Texas, Houston Division. Julius Brown, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 4223. Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School District, LaGrange, Texas, and the La- Grange Independent School District, a Body Corporate, L. D. Boelsche, President of said Board and C. A. Lemmons, Superintendent of the Public School System of the City of LaGrange, Texas, and of the said LaGrange Independent School District, and in their Official Capacity, Defendants. Came On before me on the 5th day of December, 1949, The LaGrange Independent School District by and through its duly authorized and constituted offi cials and Julius Brown, appearing for himself and on the behalf of others, similarly situated, as alleged in the said Julius Brown’s petition, and upon hearing the pleadings read and the evidence introduced, the Court entered on the 16th day of February, 1950, its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, which said Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are referred to for all purposes and by reference are made a part hereof, and incorporated hereinfor all purposes. The plaintiff’s plea for an Injunction is denied and further It Is Ordered, Adjudged, Decreed, Deter mined and Declared that the establishment, main tenance and operation of separate schools for negro 448 pupils and white pupils in the LaGrange Independent School District is not unlawful under the Constitution and other Laws of the State of Texas, nor does it violate the provisions of Amendment XIV to the Con stitution of the United States. It Is Further Ordered and Declared that the sepa rate schools maintained for negro pupils in the La- Grange Independent School District are substantially equal to the schools maintained for white pupils. It Is Further Ordered and Declared that the plain tiff, Julius Brown, has shown sufficient interest to permit him to prosecute the within action. All costs herein are adjudged against the plaintiff. Done at Houston, Texas, this 7 day of March, 1950. (S.) T. M. KENNERLY, Judge. (S.) BEN N. RAMEY, Approved As To Form: (S.) W. J. DURHAM, (W. J. Durham), Attorney for Plaintiff. (S.) MILES L. MOSS, (Miles L. Moss), (S.) DOUGLAS W. McGREGOR, (Douglas W. McGregor), Attorneys for Defendants. 449 NOTICE OF APPEAL. (Filed April 6, 1950.) In The District Court Of The United States For The Southern District Of Texas, Houston Division. Julius Brown, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 4223. Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School District, LaGrange, Texas, and the La- Grange Independent School District, a Body Corporate, L. D. Boelsche, President of said Board and C. A. Lemmons, Superintendent of the Public School System of the City of LaGrange, Texas, and of the said LaGrange Independent School District, and in their Official Capacity, Defendants. Notice Is Hereby Given That Julius Brown, plaintiff above-named, appeals to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the final judgment of the Court entered in this cause on the 7th day of March, 1950, denying the relief sought by plaintiff as more fully set out in said judgment. Dated this the 6th day of April, 1950. W. J. DURHAM, (W. J. Durham), 2600 Flora, P. O. Box 641, Dallas, Texas. U. SIMPSON TATE, (U. Simpson Tate). 1718 Jackson Street, Dallas, Texas. 450 Copy of the above Notice of Appeal has been this day delivered to the office of Douglas McGregor, Second National Bank Bldg., Houston, Texas, Attor neys for Defendants. (Signature Illegible), Acting for Attys for Plain tiff. BONDS FOR COSTS OF APPEAL. (Filed April 6, 1950.) (Title Omitted.) Know All Men By These Presents, that we, Julius Brown as principal and E. E. Ward and Pearl Carina Anderson as sureties, are held and firmly bound unto the Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School District, LaGrange, Texas, and the LaGrange Independent School District, a Body Corporate, L. D. Boelsche, President of said Board and C. A. Lem mons, Superintendent of the Public School System of the City of LaGrange, Texas, and of the said La Grange Independent School District, and in their of ficial capacity, in the full and just sum of Two Hun dred and fifty ($250.00) Dollars to be paid to the said Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School District, LaGrange, Texas, and the LaGrange Independent School District, a Body Corporate, L. D. Boelsche, President of said Board and C. A. Lem mons, Superintendent of the Public School System of the City of LaGrange, Texas, and of the said La Grange Independent School District, and in their of 451 ficial Capacity, their successors, executors, adminis trators and assigns; to which payment, well and truly to be made, We bind ourselves, our heirs, exe cutors and administrators, jointly and severally by these presents. Sealed With Our Seals And Dated This 4th day of April, 1950. Whereas, on February 16, 1950, in an action de pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas between Julius Brown as plaintiff and the Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School District LaGrange, Texas, and the LaGrange Independent School District a Body Corporate, L. D. Boelsche, President of said Board and C. A. Lemmons, Superintendent of the Public School System of the City of LaGrange, Texas, and of the said LaGrange, Texas, Independent School Dis trict, and in their official capacity as defendants, a judgment was rendered against the said plaintiff, to-wit: Came on before me on the 5th day of December, 1949 The LaGrange Independent School District by and through its duly authorized and constituted offi cials and Julius Brown, appearing for himself and on the behalf of others, similarly situated, as alleged in the said Julius Brown’s petition, and upon hearing the pleadings read and the evidence introduced, the Court entered on the 16th day of February, 1950, its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, which said Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are re ferred to for all purposes and by references are made a part hereof, and incorporated herein for all pur poses. 452 The plaintiff’s plea for an Injunction is denied and further It Is Ordered, Adjudged, Decreed, De termined and Declared that the establishment, main tenance and operation of separate schools for negro pupils and white pupils in the LaGrange Independent School District is not unlawful under the Constitution and other Laws of the State of Texas, nor does it violate the provisions of Amendment XIV to the Con stitution of the United States. It Is Further Ordered And Declared that the sepa rate schools maintained for negro pupils in the La- Grange Independent School District are substantially equal to the schools maintained for white pupils. It Is Further Ordered And Declared That the plain tiff, Julius Brown, has shown sufficient interest to permit him to prosecute the within action. All costs herein are adjudged against the plaintiff. Done at Houston, Texas, this 16th day of February 1950. (S.) .......................................... Judge. and the said plaintiff, Julius Brown, having filed a Notice of Appeal from such judgment to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Cir cuit; Now, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said plaintiff, Julius Brown, shall prosecute his appeal to effect and shall pay costs if the appeal is dismissed or the judgment affirmed, or such costs as the said United States Circuit Court of Appeals 453 may award against the plaintiff, Julius Brown, if the judgment is modified or in any other event, then this obligation to be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. JULIUS BROWN, Principal. E. E. WARD, Surety. PEARL CARINA ANDER SON, Surety. State Of Texas, County Of Dallas. Before Me, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said State and County on this day personally appeared E. E. Ward, to me well known, and known to me to be a creditable person, who, after being by me first duly sworn, on oath, deposes and says as follows, to-wit: That the affiant desires and proposes to become a surety on the appeal bond of Julius Brown in Civil Action Number 4223 and styled “ Julius Brown vs. Board of Trustees of the LaGrange Independent School District, LaGrange, Texas and the LaGrange Independent School District, A Body Corporate, L. D. Boelsche, President of said Board and C. A. Lem mons, Superintendent of the Public School System of the City of LaGrange, Texas and the said LaGrange Independent School District and in their official ca pacity” filed in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, and in order to induce the District Clerk of the Southern District of Texas and the official charged with duty 454 of accepting said bond, to accept the bond of Julius Brown with the affiant and another or others as Sure ties thereon, make the following statement concern ing the affiant’s financial condition and with refer ence to properties owned by affiant, to-wit: That affiant is the sole owner of the following de scribed properties; that each piece of the same is presently of the market value set opposite each piece of the same; that the same is encumbered only to the extent and in the amount set opposite each piece of said property, and that each piece of the same, after deducting the amount of the encumbrances shown from the present market value thereof, has the net value set opposite each piece thereof, to- wit: Location & Description: Situated in the County of Dallas, State of Texas, and being Lot 2, Block c/598, Simpson and Clark’s Addi tion to the City of Dallas, Texas, as per map or plat thereof, Recorded in the Map Records of Dallas Coun ty, Texas. Encumbrance Net Value None $25,000.00 That none of the property above described is affi ant’s homestead, and that the affiant is not using and does not intend to use, the same, or any part thereof, for any homestead or business purpose. That no part of said property is exempt from force sale under the laws of the State of Texas; that no part of said prop erty is involved in litigation of any kind or charac ter; that the title to the above described property in 455 good of record and in fact in the affiant; that the af fiant has never heard of his title to any part of said property questioned by any person or corporation whomsoever, and that no part of the same is occupied by any person or corporation claiming adversely to the affiant. Dated this the 27th day of March, 1950. E. E. WARD, (E. E. Ward), Affiant-Surety. State Of Texas, County of Dallas. Before me, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said State and County, on this day personally appeared E. E. Ward known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the 27th day of March, 1950. BOBBYE DURHAM, (Bobbye Durham), Notary Public in and for Dallas County, Texas. (Seal) 456 ORDER SENDING UP ORIGINAL EXHIBITS. (Filed, July 7, 1950.) (Title Omitted.) This The 7 Day of July, 1950, came on to be heard the motion of plaintiff Julius Brown in the above styled and numbered cause to have certain exhibits not included in the Transcript of Evidence furnished by the Court Reporter forwarded in the original to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as part of the re cord on appeal in the above styled and numbered cause; and the said motion having been considered, and the Court being of the opinion that it ought to be granted, it is, therefore, Ordered that the following exhibits not included in the Transcript of Evidence furnished by the Court Reporter be forwarded in the original to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as part of the record on appeal in the said cause; Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’ s 1, Photograph; 2, Photograph; 3, Photograph; 4, Photograph; 5, Photograph; Plaintiff’ s 6, Photograph; 457 Plaintiff’s 7, Photograph; Plaintiff’s 8, Photograph; Plaintiff’ s 9, Photograph; Plaintiff’s 10, Photograph; Plaintiff’s 11, Photograph; Plaintiff’ s 12, Photograph; Plaintiff’ s 13, Photograph; Plaintiff’s 14 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 15 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 16 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 17 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 18 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 19 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 20 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 21 Photograph; Plaintiff’ s 22 Photograph; Plaintiffs 23 Photograph; Plaintiff’ s 24 Photograph; 458 Plaintiff’s 26 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 27 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 28 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 29 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 30 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 31 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 32 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 33 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 34 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 35 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 36 Photograph; Plaintiff’s 37, Superintendent’s Report 1947-1948; Plaintiff’s 38, Superintendent’s Report 1948-1949; Defendant’s 1, Elevation of School, plat; Defendant’s 5, Photograph; Defendant’s 6, Photograph; Plaintiff’ s 25 Photograph; Defendant’s 7, Photograph; 459 Defendant’s 9 Photograph; Defendant’s 10, Photograph; Defendant’s 11, Photograph; Defendant’s 12 Photograph; Defendant’s 13 Photograph; Defendant’s 14 Photograph; Defendant’s 15, Photograph; Defendant’s 16, Photograph; Defendant’s 17, Photograph; Defendant’s 18, Photograph; Defendant’s 19, Photograph; Defendant’s 20, Photograph; Defendant’s 21, Photograph; Defendant’s 22, Photograph; Defendant’s 31, Pre-registration Sheet for Survey Defendant’s 32, Ground Plan; Defendant’s 8, Photograph; Defendant’s 33, Photograph; 480 Defendant’s 35, Blue Print; Defendant’s 36, Acknowledgment of Order; Defendant’s 37, Design in Progressive Architecture, April 1949; Defendant’s 38, Design in Progressive Architec ture, June 1949; Defendant’s 39, Design in Architectural Forum, October 1949; Defendant’s 40, Design 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Architec tural Forum; Defendant’s 41, Photograph; Defendant’s 42, Photograph; Defendant’s 43, Photograph; Defendant’s 44, Photograph; Defendant’s 45, Photograph; Defendant’s 46, Photograph; Defendant’s 48, Photograph; Defendant’s 51, Photograph; Defendant’s 55, School Desk. (S.) T. M. KENNERLY, Judge. Defendant’s 34, Photograph; 461 CLERK’S CERTIFICATE. United States Of America, Southern District Of Texas. I, HAL V. WATTS, Clerk of the United States Dis trict Court for the Southern District of Texas, in the Fifth Circuit and District aforesaid, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of the record and all proceedings had in the case, as called for in the Designation for Contents of Record, Page 1 of this Transcript, in Cause No. 4223, on the Civil Action Docket of said Court at Houston, entitled Ju lius Brown vs. Board of Trustees of LaGrange Inde pendent School District, et al., as the same now ap pears on file and of record in my office. And that in accordance with the Application to send up certain of the Original Exhibits and the Order thereon, which said Order appears on Page 544 of said Transcript, the Original Exhibits referred to in said Order are herewith transmitted as a part of the Transcript. To Certify Which, Witness my hand and the Seal of said Court at Houston, in said District, this the 7 day of July A. D. 1950. HAL Y. WATTS, (Hal V. Watts), (Seal) Clerk, United States Dis trict Court, Southern Dis trict of Texas. E. S. TIPTON PRINTING CO.. NEW ORLEANS — 99573