Correspondence from Reed to Ganucheau; from Reed to Judges Politz, Clark, and Garza
Public Court Documents
July 26, 1988

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Attorney Notes 1695-1696, 1982. 435f5908-e192-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/23dd5518-92c1-4d70-851f-808eba2ca7d5/attorney-notes-1695-1696. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
t6# 9,n' .'F"""rrry* j1riffi ;gi'ffi"##ii$F"fity;lifi+:t-:#i tional representaiiof,' *6" se6m to u"to"'e' as. I read this' that a ili'"':firi,i[i"i"iies"'iiilra?q.ii"" ti,Lt ?rii"Ify;ili',if;8:"::3'ftti:t;;"i;;-;nt, uiless it can be.shown illH#i;;ili" byfit;;ffi;i'-ti'"'L ""vt4i#.TJg#lise report ;; ;, casi that would cause You to re Mr. RrvNo-.. 1"fri"-i. tf," "rro"t" t"po"t goes s1s,se3!^that there ir"ii"t,ro."*"-pi;;bd;;*-"bi*'fl"rfrir':,#i,e*['ffi#fifi[^*i'r"i""iriion tttat w6uld suggest tht "eifects" test.-iii".t"t l,plnv. That by.itself would? Mr. RuYror,m. That iE riSht' 1696 Senator Lnlnv' \lhere do-you re.ad that in the House report be ""il;i';; nJ nna that conclusion in there? Mr. RsyNo-.. ' 'ir'i"i";I; ii-i;yi i" tt","r" is a corelation be tween the at-large "i*iio"t t"d drsproportiot'"t representatiol ?l lJ'i]#iiili -fr,;f ir ."-"iir-i"g tt ri'this particular amendment rs u3"T;*rt"l"fil.'"o, do not thin-k rhat the hearings conducred b1' Senator Harch,naiio.-"'ir-t-fi" Houlq -rt" it crystal clear that F,n1"fi :1,s,l;*r;i::Hr.t,fl 'ffi}f }*l#,ixrz:l't'i: "'#:ul::iror^os, senator, those cases are fullv consistent with mv restimony a'd *'ith"il]';;;;;;"d d;-;6t at all suggest the kind of test that *;;id #fi;i;;-""a"i ihe amendment to the ,"r:T"f:'r' ,EAH'. Do you think-it ls your position rhen that rhe House report *o,rri"riJ't#i^;h" -irir-il,i"a&i judge would read a requiremenl ro. p.'ofiiJiiii-ili.*i"Gli;" oi thl Voting Rights ofif f,:lffSlT;1"1*r:;,;**a what my statement was and I did not get it. ^ H"utot'L*sv. What is your statement-- fi';:H;;"-;fi. I ;;;6uie what vou are referring to' senator Lury. ffi"'G "iiJ tl"l,i"s[ion or wheth6r a judse \ riu require proportional representatlon' . - Mr. RnvNorr.. i'd#i;XT-Liiir'"a' that' a judge. under this standard could weli Jiiil"Iir vqq ld'C! atJar[e tvt9p- and un- derrepresentation, iffii ;#i Y';"le u" "-"rrrci"t't ti ttlo afoul of the "resuits" test under section 2 "s "'gge"ted by -the Hou99 and that tr,!"r?i"sr.s9i"tl;;;;l-*nt""""-t-t'":?fi "ti:il'#f,i"HT#%;;;";;?;; in and of itself will not be Uasis to avoid that reau!'o r r -.