Correspondence from Reed to Ganucheau; from Reed to Judges Politz, Clark, and Garza

Public Court Documents
July 26, 1988

Correspondence from Reed to Ganucheau; from Reed to Judges Politz, Clark, and Garza preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Attorney Notes 1695-1696, 1982. 435f5908-e192-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/23dd5518-92c1-4d70-851f-808eba2ca7d5/attorney-notes-1695-1696. Accessed April 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    t6#
9,n' .'F"""rrry* j1riffi ;gi'ffi"##ii$F"fity;lifi+:t-:#i

tional representaiiof,' *6" se6m to u"to"'e' as. I read this' that a

ili'"':firi,i[i"i"iies"'iiilra?q.ii"" ti,Lt 
?rii"Ify;ili',if;8:"::3'ftti:t;;"i;;-;nt, uiless it can be.shown

illH#i;;ili" byfit;;ffi;i'-ti'"'L ""vt4i#.TJg#lise 
report

;; ;, casi that would cause You to re
Mr. RrvNo-.. 1"fri"-i. tf," "rro"t" t"po"t goes s1s,se3!^that there

ir"ii"t,ro."*"-pi;;bd;;*-"bi*'fl"rfrir':,#i,e*['ffi#fifi[^*i'r"i""iriion tttat w6uld suggest tht
"eifects" test.-iii".t"t l,plnv. That by.itself would?

Mr. RuYror,m. That iE riSht'

1696

Senator Lnlnv' \lhere do-you re.ad that in the House report be

""il;i';; 
nJ nna that conclusion in there?

Mr. RsyNo-.. ' 'ir'i"i";I; ii-i;yi i" tt","r" is a corelation be

tween the at-large "i*iio"t t"d drsproportiot'"t representatiol ?l
lJ'i]#iiili 

-fr,;f ir ."-"iir-i"g tt ri'this particular amendment rs

u3"T;*rt"l"fil.'"o, do not thin-k rhat the hearings conducred b1'

Senator Harch,naiio.-"'ir-t-fi" Houlq -rt" it crystal clear that

F,n1"fi :1,s,l;*r;i::Hr.t,fl 'ffi}f }*l#,ixrz:l't'i:
"'#:ul::iror^os, senator, those cases are fullv consistent with mv

restimony a'd *'ith"il]';;;;;;"d d;-;6t at all suggest the

kind of test that *;;id #fi;i;;-""a"i ihe amendment to the

,"r:T"f:'r' 
,EAH'. Do you think-it ls your position rhen that rhe

House report *o,rri"riJ't#i^;h" 
-irir-il,i"a&i judge would read a

requiremenl ro. p.'ofiiJiiii-ili.*i"Gli;" oi thl Voting Rights

ofif f,:lffSlT;1"1*r:;,;**a what my statement was and

I did not get it.
^ H"utot'L*sv. What is your statement--

fi';:H;;"-;fi. I ;;;6uie what vou are referring to'

senator Lury. ffi"'G "iiJ 
tl"l,i"s[ion or wheth6r a judse \ riu

require proportional representatlon' . -
Mr. RnvNorr.. i'd#i;XT-Liiir'"a' that' a judge. under this

standard could weli Jiiil"Iir vqq ld'C! atJar[e tvt9p- and un-

derrepresentation, iffii ;#i Y';"le u" 
"-"rrrci"t't 

ti ttlo afoul of the

"resuits" test under section 2 
"s "'gge"ted 

by -the Hou99 and that

tr,!"r?i"sr.s9i"tl;;;;l-*nt""""-t-t'":?fi 
"ti:il'#f,i"HT#%;;;";;?;; in and of itself will not be

Uasis to avoid that reau!'o r r -.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top