Memorandum on Preston Cobb v. Georgia - LDF Challenges Practice of Excluding from Jury Death Penalty Opponents
Press Release
April 21, 1967
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 4. Memorandum on Preston Cobb v. Georgia - LDF Challenges Practice of Excluding from Jury Death Penalty Opponents, 1967. d6085cc4-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c8e055cb-0875-483a-9239-ab0ee58d266b/memorandum-on-preston-cobb-v-georgia-ldf-challenges-practice-of-excluding-from-jury-death-penalty-opponents. Accessed January 07, 2026.
Copied!
cu
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEASE Director Counsel
egal efense und Jack Greenberg
Sj Director, Patlic Relations
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Joss DeVore, Te:
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 ‘ NIGHT NOMBER 212-749-8487
FOR RELEASE
FRIDAY
April 21, 1967 #
MEMORANDUM
TO: WASHINGTON AND ATLANTA REPORTERS
FROM: Jesse DeVore, Director of Public Information
RES LDF CHALLENGES PRACTICE
OF EXCLUDING. FROM JURY
DEATH PENALTY OPPONENTS
CASE TITLE: Freston Cobb v. State of Georgia
DATE OF FILING: April 21, 1967
QUESTION Does the practice of questioning prospective jurors
PRESENTED: as to their opposition to capital punishment, and
not seating those who answer yes, create a panel
biased in favor of capital punishment?
NATIONAL NEWS All states with the exception of Iowa and South
ANGLE: Dakota practice some form of this line of questioniro
WASHINGTON---The U.S. Supreme Court was today asked by the NAACP Legal
Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) to reverse the Georgia death
penalty of Preston Cobb.
The High Court is being asked to outlaw a custom, practiced in
some variation in all states except Iowa and South Dakota, of asking
2rospective jurors if they are “conscientiously opposed to capital
punishment."
Cobb aroused international concern when he was first sentenced to
death in Jasper County, Georgia, in 1961 at the age of 15.
LDF attorneys argue that:
* Mr. Cobb was denied his rights under the 14th Amendment when per-
sons, otherwise eligible for jury service, were excused from the
jury which tried him solely because they were conscientiously
opposed to capital punishment,
* Mr. Cobb was tried and indicted by juries from which Negroes were
systematically excluded, or only tokenly included, from Jasper
and Bibb counties. The jury lists, they assert, contained racial
identifications.
Young Cobb was originally indicted on the charge of murder by the
Jasper County, Ga,, grand jury in 1961.
He was tried in the Superior Court of Jasper County that year,
found guilty, and sentenced to death.
That ruling was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Georgia.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled in 1964 on the ground
that Negroes had been systematically excluded from the grand jury that
indicted Mr. Cobb and from the petit jury that tried him. PF q
5
He was reindicted by the Jasper County grand jurfJin February of
1263. “A motion for change of venue was granted and petitioner was tried
be Fore a petit jury in Bibb County. He was found guilty,.but the jury
returned a recommendation of mercy; petitioner was sentenced to life
‘imprisonment. On appeal the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed petitioner's
conviction,
B25 =205