Memorandum on Preston Cobb v. Georgia - LDF Challenges Practice of Excluding from Jury Death Penalty Opponents
Press Release
April 21, 1967

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 4. Memorandum on Preston Cobb v. Georgia - LDF Challenges Practice of Excluding from Jury Death Penalty Opponents, 1967. d6085cc4-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c8e055cb-0875-483a-9239-ab0ee58d266b/memorandum-on-preston-cobb-v-georgia-ldf-challenges-practice-of-excluding-from-jury-death-penalty-opponents. Accessed July 03, 2025.
Copied!
cu President Hon. Francis E. Rivers PRESS RELEASE Director Counsel egal efense und Jack Greenberg Sj Director, Patlic Relations NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Joss DeVore, Te: 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 ‘ NIGHT NOMBER 212-749-8487 FOR RELEASE FRIDAY April 21, 1967 # MEMORANDUM TO: WASHINGTON AND ATLANTA REPORTERS FROM: Jesse DeVore, Director of Public Information RES LDF CHALLENGES PRACTICE OF EXCLUDING. FROM JURY DEATH PENALTY OPPONENTS CASE TITLE: Freston Cobb v. State of Georgia DATE OF FILING: April 21, 1967 QUESTION Does the practice of questioning prospective jurors PRESENTED: as to their opposition to capital punishment, and not seating those who answer yes, create a panel biased in favor of capital punishment? NATIONAL NEWS All states with the exception of Iowa and South ANGLE: Dakota practice some form of this line of questioniro WASHINGTON---The U.S. Supreme Court was today asked by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) to reverse the Georgia death penalty of Preston Cobb. The High Court is being asked to outlaw a custom, practiced in some variation in all states except Iowa and South Dakota, of asking 2rospective jurors if they are “conscientiously opposed to capital punishment." Cobb aroused international concern when he was first sentenced to death in Jasper County, Georgia, in 1961 at the age of 15. LDF attorneys argue that: * Mr. Cobb was denied his rights under the 14th Amendment when per- sons, otherwise eligible for jury service, were excused from the jury which tried him solely because they were conscientiously opposed to capital punishment, * Mr. Cobb was tried and indicted by juries from which Negroes were systematically excluded, or only tokenly included, from Jasper and Bibb counties. The jury lists, they assert, contained racial identifications. Young Cobb was originally indicted on the charge of murder by the Jasper County, Ga,, grand jury in 1961. He was tried in the Superior Court of Jasper County that year, found guilty, and sentenced to death. That ruling was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Georgia. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled in 1964 on the ground that Negroes had been systematically excluded from the grand jury that indicted Mr. Cobb and from the petit jury that tried him. PF q 5 He was reindicted by the Jasper County grand jurfJin February of 1263. “A motion for change of venue was granted and petitioner was tried be Fore a petit jury in Bibb County. He was found guilty,.but the jury returned a recommendation of mercy; petitioner was sentenced to life ‘imprisonment. On appeal the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed petitioner's conviction, B25 =205