Supreme Court Destroys Jim Crow Ballot in LA.
Press Release
January 16, 1964
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Supreme Court Destroys Jim Crow Ballot in LA., 1964. 471c26b4-bd92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/cecdd076-a726-4133-864f-60716cbf3ef4/supreme-court-destroys-jim-crow-ballot-in-la. Accessed December 05, 2025.
Copied!
‘
PRESS RELEASE
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
TOCOLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEWYORK19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY President Director-Counsel Associate Counsel
SUPREME COURT DESTROYS
JIM CROW BALLOT IN LA.
January 16, 1964
WASHINGTCN---The Supreme Court unanimously struck down a Louisiana
law requiring publication of the race of candidates for public office
on nomination papers and ballots this week,
NAACP Legal Defense Fund atterneys, who won the decision, had pointed out that "designation as a Negro (in Louisiana) identifies
the candidate with a group that is...by state policy, unfit for
office,"
Justice Tom Clark, whe wrote the unanimous ruling, concluded that "race is a factor upon which the statute Operates, and its involvement promotes the ultimate discrimination, which is sufficient
to make it invalid,"
Jack Greenberg, director-counsel ef the Fund said the ruling "makes it clear once more that ours is a nation in which Government cannot classify citizens according to race,
"This decision also makes it clear that our constitution is
colorblind, This Louisiana law is the closest thing we have had to the Nazi edict that Jews be required to wear yellow armbands,"
Legal Defense Fund attorneys argued the case in behalf of Dupuy
H. Anderson and Acie J. Belton, Negro citizens of East Baton Rouge parish,
Both were candidates for nomination to the school board in their home parish during the June 8, 1962 Democratic party primary election.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys participating in the case
included Mr, Greenberg, who argued before the Supreme Court, James
M. Nabrit, III and Johnnie A. Jones who were of counsel,
=c0me
SUPREME COURT TO HEAR
ATLANTA SCHOOL CASES
WASHINGTON---The U.S, Supreme Court this week advised the NAACP Legal
Defense Fund that it will hear arguments on the Atlanta school inte-
gration cases March 30th,
Jack Greenberg, the Fund's director-counsel, said the caurt's announcement "demonstrates its concern with the pace of school de-
segregation,"
"The cases involve validity of a twelve year plan and a pupil
assignment plan. Desegregation of teachers is also a major issue,
"We are grateful for the opportunity to present our arguments
before the next sehool term," he said.
Atlanta Negra} parents began petitioning their local school
authorities for desegregation of that city’s public schools in 1955, one year after the Supreme Court's Brown decision, ( )
more
Ss
Supreme Court To Hear
Atlanta School Cases -2-
Yet today, “Atlanta's segregated school system is still
essentially intact," Legal Defense attorneys pointed out in their
petition to the Supreme Court,
They added that "Atlanta now has a total public school popu-
lation of approximately 106,000---about 57,500 whites and 48,000
Negroes.
"Although Negroes constitute 45 per cent of the total, they have
been alloted only 33 per cent of the school buildings and 40 per cent
of the teachers and principals.
"They also suffer serious overcrowding in certain schools and
higher pupil-teacher ratios," Legal Defense attorneys stated,
The lawyers appealed the judgment of the Court of Appeals,
entered in June of 1963.
2302