Spencer v Casavilla Brief of Plaintiff Appellants

Public Court Documents
January 16, 1990

Cite this item

Spencer v Casavilla Brief of Plaintiff Appellants preview

54 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

Topic
- Criminal Justice
- Economic Justice
Notable Person
- Thurgood Marshall
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 1bfe32ca-c19a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Paul Hancock, Esq. (Department of Justice), 1987. 47d5cf51-eb92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a7c63d00-f408-451c-8a97-ee000058705e/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-paul-hancock-esq-department-of-justice. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    LesB,d**H,
October 29, 1987

PauI Hancock, Esq.
Voting Sectl.on
Civil Rights oivision
Departnent of Justice
320 First Street, N.W.
Roon 716
tlashington, D.e. 20001

Dear Paul:

I really appreciated your coming to San Antonio to
do the section 5 workshop with ne; I'm only sorry ne
didn't get more tine to talk. f thought what you said
about using the intent prong of section 5 was
interesting. ft ties in with what te're finding with
Dillard v. Crenshaw Countv (fI)--proving intent gives
litigants freedom to do a lot nore than we can do in a
straight results case, both with respect to the breadth
of coverage and with respect to getting around some
defendants' overly literal reading of Ginqles.

I finally got the three-judge court's opinion in
Jones v. Edwards. It was pretty much what I expected,
putting a huge amount of faith in the ability of a
registrar who screwed up every stage of the process to
perfom the final step properly. But I hlas glad we
picked up Judge Rubin. We'Il wait to see whether the
section 2 claim is worth pursuing.

Have you been able to get the section 2OB
materialE and the case list together? There's no
incredible rush from this end, but I think we'd like to
get the manual done by the end of November.

P1ease say hello to Gerry for me.

si

S. Xar1an

rhc*MCpLcsarrh,GnscrEdrE **,ffifli1trffiffi',Ii;I#;i"fffi''I:#ffi*^orGororcdhopr.eo{MCp13rs6eve;1
f,Of iaitornOiOUVficmfdprmsharcsttscommiimcnttorqrialnghts LDth.sludlorowlycarsllp.raESo.rd.prooram,tbtl,ollcrldbr.dget

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND. INC.
99 Hudson Street, New York, N.Y 10013 o (212121$1900

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Spencer v Casavilla Brief of Plaintiff Appellants

Topic

Notable Person

Organization

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in