Thurgood Marshal Reports on Legal Defense Fund Activities
Press Release
January 6, 1961
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Thurgood Marshal Reports on Legal Defense Fund Activities, 1961. fef915e2-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d01589d5-fc7a-4cea-96b9-8569a30962cf/thurgood-marshal-reports-on-legal-defense-fund-activities. Accessed January 11, 2026.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE® e
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
TO COLUMBUS CIRCLE » NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS c= THURGOOD MARSHALL
President Director-Counsel
FOR RELEASE: Friday, January 6, 196
THURGOOD MARSHALL REPORTS ON
LEGAL DEFENSE FUND ACTIVITIES
NEW YORK. -- Defending the students arrested in connection with
sit-in protest demonstrations and speeding up the legal activities for
school desegregation in several states, are the major objectives of the
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund for 1961, Thurgood Marshall,
the Fund's director-counsel, announced today.
Approximately 1700 students were arrested and convicted during
1960 in whose behalf attorneys for the Legal Defense Fund have filed
suits arising out of the sit-in demonstrations. He said the battery of
some 75 Negro and white lawyers throughout the country are now engaged
in defending the students.
As the new year begins, cases are on record which were filed in
behalf of Negro children,in almost every southern state, who were
barred from schools supported by public funds, because of their race.
This includes renewed legal action in two of the original five cases
which resulted in the Supreme Court's 1954 decision outlawing segrega-
tion in public education.
Mr. Marshall declared that the Legal Defense Fund "gladly assumes
full responsibility" for defending the Negroes who have been accused
and convicted because of the sit-in demonstrations.
"Most of them (the Negro students) have been charged and convicted
for crimes such as disorderly conduct, trespass, interfering with busi-
ness and parading without a license," Mr. Marshall said.
"The only crime they have committed was to protest in an orderly
and peaceful manner the denial of their right to sit at lunch counters,"
he pointed out. "To protest against injustices is the foundation of
our American democracy."
sie @ @
The Legal Defense Fund head is highly pleased and enthused with
three full scale lawyers' conferences held in New York, Washington,
D. C. and St. Paul during 1960 in connection with the sit-in demonstra-
tions. Ideas and legal theories in these cases were exchanged at the
conferences, as well as scores of drafts of pleadings and briefs on
the law and other material pertinent to the sit-in demonstrations were
prepared and distributed, Mr. Marshall disclosed. "These conferences
brought about a marvelous spirit of cooperation among the lawyers
which assures us of vitory," he stated.
As a result, Mr. Marshall asserted, several of the sit-in cases
have already been reversed by higher courts while others are still on
appeal in state appellate courts.
The first sit-in case reached the U. S. Supreme Court on December
31, 1960, when Legal Defense Fund attorneys filed three petitions in
behalf of 15 Negro students arrested last spring in Baton Rouge, La.
The high Court was urged to hear these cases on the ground that the
arrests and convictions violated the students’ constitutional rights
to protest discrimination and seek equal treatment at public lunch
counters,
The attorneys also urged the Supreme Court to lay down basic
guidance for lower courts to follow in similar cases.
With respect to public school desegregation, Mr. Marshall said
the events revolving around the New Orleans school crisis again focused
attention on America's public school segregation issues.
"The New Orleans episode may become either the dying gasp of mas-
sive resistance in interposition theories or another rallying point
for defiant southern states to continue resistance to the Supreme
Court's 1954 decision prohibiting school segregation," Mr. Marshall
stated.
"If the federal government takes a firm position and the ‘uncom-
mitted' public awakens to the great danger to America represented by
massive resistance to the law in the name of segregation, 1961 could
produce considerable civil rights advances."
The Legal Defense Fund head looks ahead with considerable hope.
He pointed out that while Little Rock and New Orleans have received a
great deal of public notice, Houston, Texas, on the other hand, which
has the largest segregated public school system in the South, began
token desegregation last September without serious incident.
Marshall noted that the Justice Department has increased its
activity on behalf of Negro voters rights following a Supreme Court
decision upholding the Civil Rights Act of 1957. He also observed
that the courts gave evidence of increasing impatience with segrega-
tionist stalling tactics as the 12-year stair-step desegregation plans
were rejected as too slow in cases arising in Delaware and Virginia.
In another case a federal appeals court held that Birmingham,
Alabama's municipal bus line may not require segregated seating, while
another court held that the Greenville, South Carolina airport may not
require Negroes to use its segregated airport waiting room.
During the coming year the Supreme Court will hear arguments by
Fund attorneys in a case involving the exclusion of Negroes from juries
in Alabama. A decision by the Supreme Court is awaited by the Fund
on a petition by Legal Defense attorneys to hear argument in another
Alabama case involving the right to representation by a lawyer at pre-
liminary stages of criminal proceedings in cases where the death penalty
may be imposed.
=*30--
January 4, 1961