NAACP Legal Defense Fund Intervenes in Rights Act Test by Alabama Citizen

Press Release
October 2, 1964

Cite this item

NAACP Legal Defense Fund Intervenes in Rights Act Test by Alabama Citizen preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Aids Justice Dept. Suit Asking Supreme Ct. to Invalidate Ala. Dist. Ct. Ruling That Public Accommodations Section of Civil Rights Act is Unconstitutional

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 56d6634e-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 1. NAACP Legal Defense Fund Intervenes in Rights Act Test by Alabama Citizen, 1964. 56d6634e-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d75e1b4c-9942-479e-92dc-4352189760fe/naacp-legal-defense-fund-intervenes-in-rights-act-test-by-alabama-citizen. Accessed October 08, 2025.

Copied!

    10 Columbus Circle 
New York, N.Y. 10019 
JUdson 6-8397 

NAACP 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund 
PRESS RELEASE 

Oe Allan Knight Chalmers 
Director-Counsel 

Jack Greenberg 
Associate Counsel FOR RELEASE 

Constance Baker Motley Friday 
ss 

October 2, 1964 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 
INTERVENES IN RIGHTS ACT 
TEST BY ALABAMA CITIZEN 

WASHINGTON--The U.S. Supreme Court was asked to strike down an 

Alabama District Court ruling which said the public accommodations 

section of the Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional. 

Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund today filed an 

amicus curiaw brief in the Justice Department's case against 

Ollie McClung, Sr., Birmingham restaurant owner. 

The Alabama District Court asserted that the public 

accommodations section of the Act is an exercise of "naked power" 

by the Congress which is unsanctioned by the Constitution. 

Jack Greenberg, director counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense 
Fund, and his associates assert that Congress did have the power 
to enact the law being questioned. 

They added that Mr. McClung's attack on the Civil Rights Act 
presents danget in that. "the.fotcge and effettiveness-of the-Act 
may be weakened, even temporarily, by a restrictive construction." 

"Even an inadvertent or implied restriction on the coverage of 
the Act could cripple it immeasurably." Mr. Greenberg asserts, by 
undermining the pattern of voluntary compliance which has 
emerged in many localities as well as by its effect on enforcement 
proceedings in many lower courts." 

The Legal Defense Fund's brief stressed three reasons as to 
why "Ollie's Barbecue" falls under the Civil Rights Act: 

*It is a place of public accommodation within the Act in 
that it ‘offers to serve interstate travelers." 

*Mr. McClung failed to establish that he does not actually 
serve interstate travelers. “The most logical inference 
from the record is that he does," the Fund's brief states. 

*The evidence concerning this restaurant establishes that a 
substantial portion of the food which "Ollie's Barbecue” 
services has moved in commerce. 

The Fund, in filing its amicus brief, pointed out that it 
has been, for many years, “the principal organization regularly 
representing Negro citizens claiming denials of equal protection 
of the laws, due process of law, and other’ rights secured by the x 
Constitution.” ‘ 

Mr. Greenberg was joined by Fund attorneys Constance Baker 
Motley, Associate Counsel, and James M. Nabrit, III, Assistant ; 
Counsel. Charles L. Black, Jr. of New Haven, «Connecticut was - 

of counsel. & . 

= 60:< 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Rlverside 9-8487 <P> SO

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

NAACP Legal Defense Fund Intervenes in Rights Act Test by Alabama Citizen

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in