December 10th Hearing in Mississippi "Chicken Feed" Case

Salone v USA Petitioners Reply Brief preview

6 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

Impact area
- Economic Justice
Topic
- Economic Justice
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 75d95a8c-c39a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. December 10th Hearing in Mississippi "Chicken Feed" Case, 1962. 6ec4fa17-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5ce2e655-213c-40e3-954a-b5ee79feb6ed/december-10th-hearing-in-mississippi-chicken-feed-case. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    PRESS RELEASE 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
O COLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEW YORK19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397 

oe KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY 
resident Director-Counsel Associate Counsel 

Ss 

DECEMBER 10TH HEARING IN 
MISSISSIPPI "CHICKEN FEED" CASE 

December 6, 1962 

NEW YORK -- On Monday, December 10th, Mississippi District Judge 

Alan Cox is scheduled to begin hearings at Aberdeen, Miss. in the 

infamous Kennard "chicken feed" case. 

Clyde Kennard is the Hattiesburg, Miss. Negro student who two 

years ago was sentenced to a seven year jail term for allegedly 

helping to plan the burglary of five bags of chicken feed. Kennard's 

arrest followed his attempt to become the first Negro to enter all- 

white Mississippi Southern College in September 1959. 

Monday's hearing will be on a new Federal District Court suit 

filed last month by NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys which aims 

to secure a new jury trial for Kennard on the "chicken feed" charge. 

The suit maintains that Kennard was convicted by a jury from 

which Negroes were arbitrarily and systematically excluded. 

Since 1961, Legal Defense Fund attogyneys have attempted many 

legal actions to win Kennard's freedom, all to no avail. An appeal 

to the U. S. Supreme Court from Mississippi courts was turned down 

by the high Court in August 1961. Kennard is now sickly, and has 

never been able to receive bail from Parchman Penitentiary in 

Forrest County, where he is currently jailed. 

Defense Fund attorney Derrick Bell, who prepared the federal 

court complaint, pointed out that jury panels are selected from 

county voter registration rolls. The complaint cites evidence that 

Forrest County, where Kennard was convicted, has barred Negroes from 

registering to vote. 

Bell said that in 1959 the U. S. Commission on Civil Rights 

reported that only 16 Negroes were registered as of 1955, though 

Forrest County has 7,406 Negroes of voting age. He also pointed 

out that there is a contempt action pending in the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans against Therron C, Lynd, the 



EQS 

Circuit Clerk and Registrar of Forrest County, because of his 

continued refusal to register qualified Negroes. 

The Kennard case has received considerable publicity because 

of similar efforts of Mississippi officials to bring criminal charges 

against James Meredith last summer, The case was brought to national 

attention by a November 8th article of the Reporter Magazine entitled 

"One Negro Who Didn't Go To College.” 

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund attorneys for Kennard 

are George N. Leighton of Chicago, I1l., who has been retained as a 

special attorney in this case, R. Jess Brown of Vicksburg, Miss., 

and Derrick A. Bell, Jr. and Jack Greenberg of New York City.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Salone v USA Petitioners Reply Brief

Impact area

Topic

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in