Court Tells Union it Cannot Discriminate Because of Race
Press Release
November 19, 1974
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Court Tells Union it Cannot Discriminate Because of Race, 1974. d8c4effb-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/db6d4b9e-c5ca-4941-b47d-47c15d4e7091/court-tells-union-it-cannot-discriminate-because-of-race. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
4
} B } =f od NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. ue F LS} BS a & 12 Geary St.; San Francisco, Calif. 94108 - (415) 783-8736 egal E.acisefense ..3und (National Office: 10 Columbus Circle, N. Y., N.Y. 10019 « §36-8397)
PRESS RELEASE PRESS RELEASE PRESS RELEASE PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ee LEAS
Tuesday, November 19, 1974
Contact: Ezra Hendon
452-1300
COURT TELLS UNION IT CANNOT DISCRIMINATE BECAUSE OF RACE
The United States District Court for the Northern
District of California has found that thé Bartenders International
Union, Local No. 52's failure to admit black bartenders to membership
in the union and failure to refer black bartenders to jobs is the
result of discrimination because of race. Such discrimination has
existed over a period of more than 25 years. Local #52's jurisdic-
tion covers a large part of Alameda County including the cities of
Oakland and Berkeley.
The plaintiffs in the case are three black bartenders,
all fully qualified for employment. The plaintiffs, represented by
Ezra Hendon asserted that the discriminatory policies and practices
by the union included refusal to adr t blacks to membership in the
union; failure to organize black establishments which employ barten-
ders; failure to refer black bartenders to jobs; and, failure to
take affirmative action to correct the effects of the discriminatory
practices. Hendon showed and the Court ruled that the union had
practiced discrimination against blacks since 1945 when one of the
plaintiffs first applied for membership.
Contributions are deductible for U. S. income tax purposes
The Court found that the union had violated the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Further, the
Court found that the plaintiffs are entitled to affirmative relief
requiring the union to refer the plaintiffs to the next available
full-time jobs as bartenders and that the plaintiffs are entitled to
an award of back pay for the losses they have suffered as a result
of the union's unlawful employment practices. Awards will be made
totalling $28,344.70 to the three plaintiffs.
The case filed in May of last year was supported by
the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.*
ate
* Please bear in mind that even though we were originally established
by the NAACP and those initials are retained in our name, the LDF is
a completely separate and distinct organization with no present
connection whatever with the NAACP. Our correct designation is the
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., frequently shortened
to LDF. We provide legal representation in significant civil rights
suits across the country. The San Francisco office was opened in
1968.
EIGHTH FLOOR, 12 GEARY STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108
TELEPHONE (415) 788-8736