Court Tells Union it Cannot Discriminate Because of Race
Press Release
November 19, 1974

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Court Tells Union it Cannot Discriminate Because of Race, 1974. d8c4effb-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/db6d4b9e-c5ca-4941-b47d-47c15d4e7091/court-tells-union-it-cannot-discriminate-because-of-race. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
4 } B } =f od NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. ue F LS} BS a & 12 Geary St.; San Francisco, Calif. 94108 - (415) 783-8736 egal E.acisefense ..3und (National Office: 10 Columbus Circle, N. Y., N.Y. 10019 « §36-8397) PRESS RELEASE PRESS RELEASE PRESS RELEASE PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ee LEAS Tuesday, November 19, 1974 Contact: Ezra Hendon 452-1300 COURT TELLS UNION IT CANNOT DISCRIMINATE BECAUSE OF RACE The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has found that thé Bartenders International Union, Local No. 52's failure to admit black bartenders to membership in the union and failure to refer black bartenders to jobs is the result of discrimination because of race. Such discrimination has existed over a period of more than 25 years. Local #52's jurisdic- tion covers a large part of Alameda County including the cities of Oakland and Berkeley. The plaintiffs in the case are three black bartenders, all fully qualified for employment. The plaintiffs, represented by Ezra Hendon asserted that the discriminatory policies and practices by the union included refusal to adr t blacks to membership in the union; failure to organize black establishments which employ barten- ders; failure to refer black bartenders to jobs; and, failure to take affirmative action to correct the effects of the discriminatory practices. Hendon showed and the Court ruled that the union had practiced discrimination against blacks since 1945 when one of the plaintiffs first applied for membership. Contributions are deductible for U. S. income tax purposes The Court found that the union had violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Further, the Court found that the plaintiffs are entitled to affirmative relief requiring the union to refer the plaintiffs to the next available full-time jobs as bartenders and that the plaintiffs are entitled to an award of back pay for the losses they have suffered as a result of the union's unlawful employment practices. Awards will be made totalling $28,344.70 to the three plaintiffs. The case filed in May of last year was supported by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.* ate * Please bear in mind that even though we were originally established by the NAACP and those initials are retained in our name, the LDF is a completely separate and distinct organization with no present connection whatever with the NAACP. Our correct designation is the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., frequently shortened to LDF. We provide legal representation in significant civil rights suits across the country. The San Francisco office was opened in 1968. EIGHTH FLOOR, 12 GEARY STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TELEPHONE (415) 788-8736