Miscellaneous Clippings (Folder)
Press
July 5, 1977 - February 18, 1979

7 pages
Cite this item
-
Division of Legal Information and Community Service, Clippings. Miscellaneous Clippings (Folder), 1977. 8301dc07-729b-ef11-8a69-6045bddc2d97. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/dd9ed1ef-9acc-4332-a5c1-7825dc717276/miscellaneous-clippings-folder. Accessed October 05, 2025.
Copied!
16-C C b f Atlanta gnurnal and CQNSTm TION SUNDAY. FEBRUARY 18, 1979. Atlanta Continued From Page 1-C The two views, far from conliicting, are com plementary, They look at the same coin from opposite sides — from that of the old order and the advancing guard, from north Atlanta and south; from the side that has something to lose, and the one that has much to gain. One of the few points that they concede to each other — and even then for different reasons — is that there are two Atlantas. That is not an indictment of Atlanta. It Simply means that the place once known as “the world’s next great city” has something in common with the rest of urban America. Yet there is a sense here that Atlanta -w asn ’t supposed to be that way — not for 'blacks or for whites. There is a buoyant, some- » times boosterish perception that Atlanta is Thniquely equipped with the resources for the Jnterracial Good Society. The shared affection for the city among ■•people of both races is viewed as the leavening 'Jthat could eventually pull black and white .^ tlantans into a full partnership. > But in some cases, it has caused bitter ^disappointments. Newcomers of both races ^ h o have read about the “city too busy to ^ a t e ” say they are surprised once they get ‘ here to find city life so segregated. One black jTicwcomer sneers about Atlanta’s “alleged • amage.” The image grew from the 1950s and H;1960s when Atlanta, unlike her southern neigh- • ^ r s , bad an enlightened white leadership that -Impt up communications with the city’s black ; leaders — mainly the black aristocracy — on an array of public concerns. The large black middle class then and ;now had the institutional support of Atlanta University Center, a five-college educational «nd professional resource for Ute black com- dnunity unparalleled in other southern cities. 'Then came the election of Mayor May nard Jackson in 1973. He was the first black •'^elected to the top post in a major southern •city and his election enhanced the city’s pro- 1 gressive image among outsiders. From within ,”Atlanta's black community, it was viewed as the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow — • the chance for slices of the economic pie. In the public sector, Jackson h ^ gener- ’ ated visible black advances. ’Through his joint •' venture and affirmative-action programs to extend city contracts to black businesses, the percentage of city contract funds going to .minority-owned firms has risen from 2 percent in 1972 to almost 25 percent in 1977. In City Hall, the managerial positions Jicld by blacks rose from 19 percent to 28 pcr- ' cent in Jackson’s first term, and 45 percent of ' h is appointments to cabinet-level and bureau - director’s posts went to minorities. r “Anybody who says Maynard hasn’t - helped the black person’s position in Atlanta’s economy has been asleep or can’t see,” says ;Cordy, one of a small, but growing group of • black entrepreneurs who have won city con- ' tracts since Jackson’s election. “He has defi- ; nitely made a difference as far as minority businesses go.” Yet when the score was called early this month in a study of black and white participa- • tion in the Atlanta economy, the black position j;till appeared dismally Weak. - The report released by Jan Douglass, ; head of Atlanta's Community Relations Com- Imission surveyed 53 white-owned corporations, representative of the city’s power structure, and found that blacks held only three of 458 • positions on their governing boards. Millionaire businessman Jesse Hill, the first black president of the Chamber of Com- ■fnerce, held two of the posts, and Cordy held , Jhe other one. The findings reflect the gap between •everage black and white income, which the D 970 census reported at |14,150 for whites and ,'$7,300 for blacks. The 1980 census is expected ■to show an even wider gap. The report said the board room study "seems like statistics from the 1950s and not the progress one would expect from a bustling and growing metropolis of the 1980s.” The finding sent squirms of discomfort tlirough the white community, particularly in -business sectors. Some said it simply went too ^ a r , too fast, that blacks were asking for too •wnuch, that corporate board rooms are no t^lace for social engineering. There was also a more anguished re sponse from the considerable sector of down town white business leadership that sees a movement, although halting, toward a more ■equitable sharing of power. Corporate boards turn over once in a generation, while city hails can change every four years, they said. “If I were a minority, I’d expect more progress on ail fronts,” says the •chamber’s Hammal. “But I just don’t think it happens that way. It is a more gradual proc- :.ess. It is happening and it will come.” Meanwhile, the report was greeted with ’little surprise in the black community, where .* it was widely cited as proof that “institutional • racism” still keeps blacks under white thumbs ' in Atlanta. "I really don’t think white men plot to • keep their boards all white,” says Kay : McKenzie, a prominent northsider with strong' ; liberal credentials, whose husband is a Georgia Power executive. “I know some of them are looking now for black members, but in the past, they have looked to the people they know . through business and social experience. And those are white men.” Even as the debate goes on, there is a growing group of Atlantans who do not take part in it — the underclass. They are the poor, huddled into the city’s ghettos and its 15,252 public housing units, ; where the battles against rats, r o a c l^ dis- ; ease, drugs and death take precedence over questions about who owns what in downtown ' Atlanta. Almost all of them are black, but they make up a separate division within black • Atlanta, perhaps so separate from the black ^middle class that they constitute a third Atlanta. They are a testimony to the percep tion that economic status is becoming at least ^ much of a divider as race. While the black middle class with educa tional and professional credentials has ad- .vanced significantly, many of the poor see few changes as a result of a City Hall run by a mayor of their race. They have gained little 'Jpride from the election of a black chamber of Tcommerce president. “What joint venture is all about is a few tbiack people who are already businessmen while the welfare rolls grow,” says Dr. Charles ^King, who started Urban Crisis Inc. to study .'and treat interracial tensions, “The politicians Save to stay in power and so they have to • compromise, diluting their black intensity. This ^ s n ’t explained to the l ^ k masses. Staff Photo—Bitty Dowr» BLACKS AND WHITES WORK TOGETHER ON GEORGU POWER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (L-R) Sam Dumas, Richard Johoson, Jim Davis and Bob Hughes They heard the promises and they expected to be rescued." The result has been a growing alienation of the poor from the more prosperous Atlan tans of both races. Ethel Matthews, president of the Fulton County welfare rights organiza tion and a former domestic, says she distrusts both the white and black middle classes. “Poor blacks are discriminated against by whites and blacks,” says the mother of 10 who arrived here 30 years ago from an Ala bama plantation. “Some rich blacks will crush you more than some whites. I watch the white man and I also watch the black man. Because when you are in a certain class, you have to watch them.” She speaks of vast improvements in race relations since she arrived, but adds, “even if you find some good white folks, it’s difficult to trust them b^ause you’re always thinking about what your forefathers had to go up against.” Personal relationships are beside the point, says the Rev. Hosea Williams, field organizer for the late Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil rights movement, and the persistent standard bearer of Atlanta’s “have nots.” “Personally, I have the best race rela tions of anybody in Atlanta,” says Williams, who has led pickets of many downtown busi nesses, demanding more jobs and support of black institutions. He speaks of a conspiracy of the white power structure and the black middle class against the poor, calling Jackson and other black leaders who have establishment white support “pawns” of the white economic powers. “The whites have now put blacks into the position the white oppressors previously held,” be says, his raspy voice rising to preacher’s heights. “They don’t beat your head anymore, but now you’ve got less opportunity to survive in the system. If they whup me on my head, it puts a knot on my head, but it goes away. If they force me to live as a second<lass citizen and dehumanize me, it puts a knot on my life.” “The black middle class!” Williams ex claims in exasperatioa “They really don't be lieve they’re black. They talk about art rather than the rats and roaches in the projects. They don’t want to eat at Paschals anymore, they go to the Midnight Sun___ “Atlanta always been the home of the richest and most powerful Uncle Toms in America.” When asked to name them, he re fused: “I’ve gotten too Uncle Tom myself to call their names.” Williams is often discounted among both blacks and whites as a “rabble roliser,” but in the recent indictment of City Councilman Ar thur Langford, his cries of racially inspired persecution gained currency throughout the establishment black community. “It’s a sign of how insecure the com munity is, how tentative the gains feel,” says a close Jackson associate. “The slide down is so much faster than the climb up.” The question marks still loom large. As an era of shortages advances on the entire na tion, will the shrinking pie become the basis of racially inspired competition and hostilities in Atlanta? Are the historic fears and suspicions still alive enough to be fanned? In short, could Atlanta be rocked with bit ter racial violence like older, northern coun terparts have experienced in the last decade? Atlantans of both races say the city’s strongest antidote to that sort of polarization lies with the white business leadership, which holds the purse strings. Despite regular confrontations and cool ings off between City Hall and major downtown business leaders, there appears to be a growing acceptance of each otter — not necessarily as separate forces, but as potential partners. “Atlanta has a unique ingredient,” says contractor Tom Cordy, who does not mince words in criticizing the drags on minority busi ness advancement. “We have a white business community that will listen to black business men. As long as we have the lines of com munication open, we have a chance.” Time is running out, though,' leaders of both races tend to agree. Segregated housing patterns, together with white flight, have left the city’s public schools with only 10 percent white enrollraenL As they assess the seriousness of the city’s racial problems, black and white Atlan tans again perceive vastly different trends from their separate communities. Their disa greement could have grave implications: “Things are getting better,” says Dan Sweat, executive director of the powerful busi ness group, Central Atlanta Progress. "They're just getting more complicated,” Morehouse’s Dr. Anna Grant expects, however, to see "some real frustration with the escalating cost of living and attrition of human services. The factories and the jobs are out in the suburbs and the hard core poor are in the city, without access. “Once upon a time, poor people were very humble. But now they feel they are enti tled to some of these services. They're more demanding. We could have some serious prob lems, any city could.” A Place to Live or a Place to Exist? Slje A tla n ta S o u m a l THE ATLANTA CONSTITUTION SUNDAY , FEBRUARY 1 8 , 1 9 7 9 Petspcctive SECTION W hat is it like to live in Atlanta? Is the quality of life here better or worse than other cities in the country? Is Atlanta really the "world’s next great city" or is it just another of America’s troubled urban centers? A team of Atlanta Journal reporters has taken a serious look at the city to try to answer those questions. They looked at 10 areas — race, housing, education, crime, health, transportation, environment, entertainment, government and economy. What they found will probably trouble the city’s boosters and surprise its detractors. This first installment is about race relations. The series will run each Sunday in the Perspective section. R o ’ c l o c k Blacks and whites in Atlanta work together throughout the day, but ^ ^ when S o’clock conies, they go their separate ways. The photos aboveW orld and below are extreme situations, but they illustrate the point. POPULATION By DALE RUSSAKOFF And JOE GREEN Jounvif Staff Writers “I feel that Atlanta can take real pride in the field o f race relations. ” — Whitenortbside Atlanta woman- "There’s always ‘good race relations’ when whites are in control of. blocks ** — The Rev. Hosea Williams It’s no coincidence that blacks and whites here speak of Atlanta as if they live in two different cities. They do. Each has its power center downtown — one in Atlanta City Hall and the other in the city’s private corporate board rooms. One holds the city’s political reins, tee other its purse strings. Neither can survive without tee other, and during tee day, they mingle freely — in offices, over lunch, on tee streets, in task force meetings. One-on- one, they are perhaps as comfortable with each other as are blacks and whites anywhere in the United States. But by five o’clock tee separate worlds reassert themselves. Blacks go home to Atlanta’s south side, whites to tee north, bote acutely aware of what they have — and what they don’t. The race issue has faded in public intensity, but it continues to fix its stam p on every social pattern in Atlanta — housing, schooling, employment, social life, politics. It is so historically woven into tee city’s fabric that it is at work even when it seems not to be there a t all. “You have a black community teat controls the political power and a white community teat controls tee economic power. And we’ve not agreed yet on how we should proceed to share with each other,’’ says Tom Hamall, execu tive vice president of the Atlanta Chamber of Commerce. Hamall says “yet” often as he dis cusses race relations in the South’s premier city. He perceives a natural and steady, if slow, move toward true integration — economic and social. Tom Cordy, a young and accom plished black mechanical contractor and native Atlantan, speaks with less optimism. He says major lending and bonding institutions were closed to him unUl recently, despite his business’ suc cessful track record. _ _ “Nobody is going to give up power voluntarily. You either take it or you don’t get it,” says Cordy, who sits on the board of First Georgia Bank, the first black to do so. In dozens of interviews, black and white Atlantans diverged aiong racial lines as they discussed perceptions of their city. Even the sociologists — who study the same statistics and social relations — come up with different per spectives. Dr. Anna Grant, chairman of the Morehouse sociology department, notes the black political gains, but speaks more of an Atlanta plagued by “institu tional rac ism ” — nearly exclusive white dominance of private institutions like the banks, tee media and utilities. Dr. Fred Crawford, working across town at Emory University’s Center for Research in Social Change, notes the historic drags pn black advancement but concludes, “I think blacks now have so much they ought to count the suc cesses — economic opportunity, jobs, independence, equality.” Whites, regardless of their political persuasions, speak of how far blacks have come; blacks single out the barri ers still blocking their paths. Whites point to a black mayor, black top police officials, black school board leaders and — until his term ended recently — a black Chamber of Commerce president. Many of teem say blacks have “taken over the city.” Most blacks interviewed say they suspect a white plot to “take tee city back” politically. With 40 percent of tee population, white Atlantans own more than 95 percent of tee city’s wealth, ac cording to a recent study. See ATLANTA Page 16-C SCHOOLS TOP-LEVEL CITY HALL JOBS SHARE OF WEALTH The independent weekly education newspaper published by the National School Public Relations Association Washington, D.C./January 9, 1978 Vol. 20, No. 19 etoetjem Q Who's getting what for how many under funding for handicap ped (p.l40) O monitor 3 Alaska court suit to test ambiguities in Lau "remedies" (p.l43) MoAAy thcut too many zducatlonat A C A eoA cneA A tiv&. vqa- b a tty btyond thoAJi in toZ ltctiiaJi mtan&.^ Ewald B. Nyquist TRACKING AND NOT MONEY BIGGEST FACTOR IN COLLEGE ACCESS "Pouring substantially more money" into student aid for higher education probably won't make much, of a dif ference in who gets to college in the long run. What could significantly influence college attendance is a better understanding of the tracking systems in high schools. These are some of the conclusions of a review of almost 40 studies on access to college, based on data from the National Longitudinal Study (NLS) of the 1972 high school class. There have been three follow-up sur veys of the more than 23,000 graduates selected for the sample. The long-term research project is sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics. Motivation, parental expectations and a student's perceptions of the value of a college education are major determinants of college enrollment. And money is not as important as is generally supposed, according to a recent issue of Educational Researcher (Vol. 6, No. 11). "The class factor in college access is the end product of a ' host of deficits that^ in fact, probably begin to accu mulate before a child enters first grade," write research ers Samuel Peng, J.P. Bailey Jr. and Bruce Eland. So far, the NLS shows that the effects of sex and race differences in attending college are declining. When social class and scholastic aptitude are controlled, blacks of both sexes are more likely than whites to attend college. Men are still more likely to attend college than women, although this is not true for blacks. The pervasive factor, the researchers emphasize, is social class, which operates independent of other variables. "Even if a stu dent from a lower socioeconomic class had good grades and high aptitude and was enrolled in an academic curriculum," thej say, "his/her chances of going to college were still subst^atially less than an upper middle-class student with the same credentials." V.licn compared to previous studies, the NLS indicates that the rate of enrollment at (cont. on last page) f'jjKl 19.'5 -Njfionjl StLooI fufjl 137 EDUCATION U .S .A . The Independent Weekly Education Newspaper. Published each Monday by the National School Pub lic Relations Association, 1801 N. Moore St., Arlington, Va. 22209. Second-class postage paid at Arlington, Va. Index twice yearly. Suliscriplion price $39 a year. Address editorial and subscription corre spondence to EDUCATION U.S.A. Tcle- • phones: Editors: (703) 528-6560. Subscrip tion Desk: (703) 528-6771. Editorial D irecto r: John H . W herry Executive Ed ito r: Anne C . Lewis ’ Associate Ed ito r: David C . Savage Sen io r Ed ito r: jenny M cAllister Research A ssistant: Janet Eaffy Contributing Editors: Robert W . Cole, B. Rodney Davis, Peggy Odell Gonder, J. W illiam Jones, George N eill, Shirley Boes N eill, Robert Olds, Rose Marie Scott-Blair. Staff: Editorial Services, Cynthia Menand; Business Services, Mildred S. Wainger; Production Services, Deborah Lucckese. Cooperating Organizations. EDUCATION U.S.A . is published in cooperation with the American Assn, of School Adminis trators, American Assn, of School Li brarians, Assn, for Supervision and Cur riculum Development, Assn, of School Business Officials of the United States and Canada, Council of Chief Slate School Officers, National Assn, of Elementary School Principals, National Assn, of Sec ondary School Principals, National Assn, of Slate Boards of Education and National Congress of Parents and Teachers. Microfilm editions from University Micro films, 3(X) N. Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, Mich. 48106. Tracking Biggesl Factor (cont. from first page) two-year junior and com munity colleges almost doubled in a decade. Enrollment in four-year colleges declined slightly, and there was a marked decline at vocational-technical schools. The degree of selectivity at the colleges also makes a dif ference. Most of the black students (71%) attending four- year colleges enroll at those that do not have strict selectivity standards. This complicates the problem of equality of educational opportunity, according to the re searchers. "If the majority of blacks or other ethnic minorities are enrolling in institutions in which the prospects for personal advancement or career development are substantially lower than average, then focusing only on total enrollment rates can be misleading," they say. The research shows that hiah school tracking is the single most powerful predictor of college attendance. It is not surprising that students in academic high school programs are more likely to attend college, but various studies also substantiate that non-academic programs def initely have the effect of negative labeling and stigma tizing. Students in these tracks have lower class rank, math achievement scores and self-concepts and less contact with peers who are college-bound. "An adequate understand ing of who goes ̂ to college ultimately requires understand ing far more than we do at present about the Internal structuring of the high school curriculum and what social forces guide students into one track or another," the re searchers emphasize. And an equally disturbing finding in the study is that a larger number of highly able stu dents, as determined by the verbal SAT, do not attend college, compared to a decade ago. Hopefully, say the researchers, further NLS analysis will find out if this talent has been lost to society or has found other outlets. O o EDUCATION U.S.A ./January 9,1978 !)N U.S.A. j Jtrit j j ’ ■ n .».j t -j m Pulilishcd by National School Public Relations Association 1801 North M oore Slieet Arlington, V irg in ia 22209 SECOND CLASS i^OSTAGE PA ID A RLIN G TO N , V IR G IN IA 0 9 K A S H M C C U U P 7 ^ 3 T 0 1 20005 O Library of Congress In the Shadow of Southern History By Eli Evans Some years ago, during my first few days in New York, I was driving up Third Avenue when a car forced me over to the curb. I prickled with that rush of fear o f random violence that new arrivals instinctively fee! in the big city. The window rolled down so that I could see a black couple with kids piled in the back seat. The man hollered in an unmistakable accent, “Hey, man, where in North Carolina y ’air from?” “Durham,” I answered, relieved to know that it w as only my license plate that had attracted his attention. “We’re from Rocky Mount,” he said. “Sure is good to see some home folks.” We laughed and the kids waved goodbye. I haven’t thought much about that incident since then, but it came back 1 to me recently during a trip to Nash- Y r tle , where a white bus driver reacted \to the mention of New York City w obiefus. “Let ’em squirm,” he said. they can’t pay their bills, to hell w ^ 'em. Let ’em just go into bank ruptcy like they deserve.” w most Southerners and members of Congress too. New York City is a seetiging center of ethnic conflicts, briinrt^ing with corruption, narcotics, garbage and crime. But to e folks down home are labor ing under a m assive misconception. The truth is. New York City and the .Smith are linked by history into a permanent relationship that adds enor mous irony to the current one-sided discussion of urban problems. A major domestic political issue of the Carter Presidency is whether non- urban Representatives and Senators can be persuaded to help break the downward spiral of the major Ameri can cities. Sweeping welfare reform, changes in housing policy, and the rest o f the urban agenda will always have to struggle to attract Southern and Midwestern votes in Congress unless funds for cities are coupled with pro grams for rural areas. But urban ills and rural discontent are rarely related in Congressional debates though migration connects them together, as tw o sides o f the same problem. Jimmy Carter won the Presidency with a unique coalition of Southern and Northern voters. They might be activated to support a com prehensive package of urban and rural programs based on a frank discussion o f the Southern roots of the urban crisis. » Recently, a Southern Regional Council Task Force on Southern Rural Development (which included then Gov. Jimmy Carter and tw o future Cabinet officers— Commerce Secretary Juanita Kreps and Labor Secretary Ray Marshall) urged that the Federal Government formulate a national rural development policy, consolidate cur rent rural programs into a new agency or department and support a National Rural Development Bank aimed at small farmers and businesses in grow ing small towns. The report, entitled “Increasing the Options,” pointed out that 4.5 million blacks live below the poverty line in the 'South, more than half in nonmetropolitan areas. They are being lured to Southern and North ern cities, the report said, in a migra tion stream that connects rural non development to continuing urban problems. "To ignore one at the ex pense of the other,” said Vanderbilt president Alexander Heard, the task force chairman, “is virtually to guar antee that neither will be solved.” The city cannot escape the shadow of Southern history and the statistics prove it. Since the Depression, the movement of blacks to the North has represented one of the most massive movements of populations in American history. During the 1940’s, approxi mately 1.6 million blacks left the South; during the 1950’s, about 1.5 million and during the 1960’s, about 1.4 million. Most of the blacks came North in a state of despair. Depression farm prices plummeted at the same time mechanization in the cotton fields made black hands superfluous. The descendants of the freed slaves found them selves trapped in the new 20th- century slavery of unwanted labor and foreclosures. They looked North for the same reason that European immigrants had flocked to New York City through the 19th century — blacks saw in its bustling streets and economic vitality the golden door of hope, the possibility of jobs, escape from the chains of hunger and poverty. To the ethnic immigrants from a generation earlier, the needs o f the black newcomers struck a deep response. The welfare add-on of 25 percent that is a major factor depleting the future of New York City today came from New York’s m ost generous impulses. The second generation of the Jewish and Catholic immigrants wanted to insure that the new black immigrants would not have to suffer the indignities of the world of their fathers. Farm-to-city migration continues, but growing Dixie ghettos are the new destination. Even though welfare payments in New York City still ex ceed those in som e Southern states by a four-to-one ratio, 6D percent of all rural black migration is now going to Southern cities like Atlanta, New Orleans and Birmingham. The North ern big cities are not alone even if New York City’s troubles dominate the headlines. Nor do the statistics always reflect realities. For the first time, in the pe riod between 1970-1975, for example, the Census Bureau reported a sharp drop-off in migration trends, with the number of blacks leaving the South about equal to the numbers returning. Experts believe, however, that middie- class and skilled blacks are going back to jobs in the booming Southern and Southwestern cities while the poor are still coming North from rural areas and small towns. The migration is not all black. Jimmy Carter remembers a boyhood in the struggling South when whites as well as blacks tried to eke out a living with a plow and a lot of luck. He knows that millions of whites also fled to the urban centers from Ap palachia and the rural South—^more than 3 million since 1940. The welfare problem, then, is a national crisis that deserves a 200-year perspective to understand; it is a living descendant from the dark side o f America’s past. It is not only New York City’s problem nor is migration of the poor , just a black phenomenon. (In deed, the American urban problems created by migration from Puerto Rico and Mexico can also be viewed as a rural development issue.) If the only solution to New York City piobiems continues to be program cutbacks, rising taxes and fleeing in dustries (the Northeast lost 781,000 manufacturing jobs between 1960- 1975), the time will come when the Northern cities will become the mod ern version of the rural shanties of the Depression-wrecked old South— oppressive, cold, uncaring and brutal for the millions o f people who have flocked here into a jobless chasm al m ost as barren o f opportunity as the land they left. A small-town Southerner in the White House with political constitu encies both in the rural South and the big cities can proclaim that urban problems are one end of a pipeline linked to rural poverty and cannot be solved piecemeal. Combining rural de velopment with urban initiatives would find a responsive audience among Southern Congressmen who are growing more sensitive to the rising numbers o f black voters. An effective rural-urban coalition In Congress will influence the decisions in millions of families, both for those people now in the rural South who might migrate to cities North and South, and for those in New York Detroit, Chicago— black and white— who might even choose the option of going home if given half a chance. Eli Evans, author of "The Provincials: A Personal History of Jews in the South," Will become president of the Charles H. Revson Foundation in Oc tober. THE N E W YORK TIMES, SUNDAY, DECEMBER It, 1977 Fund Backs Controversial Study of ‘Racial Betterment’ By GRACE LICHTENSTEIN A private trust fund based in New York has for more than 20 y e a n supported highly controversial research by a dozen scientists who believe that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites. The Pioneer Fund, a tax-exem pt foun dation incorporated in 1937 for the ex press purpose of research into “racial betterment," was worth more than $2 million, according to its 1975 Internal Revenue Service return. Yet several offi cers of the leading geneticists' profession al organization say they never heard of it. A month-long study of the Pioneer Fund’s activities by The New York Times shows it has given at least $179,000 over the last 10 years to Dr. William B. Shock- ley, a leading proponent of the theory that whites are inherently more intelli gent than blacks. Tt>e money w as paid through Stanford University, where Professor Shockley was a Noire! Prize-winning professor of engineering science, as well as through his own personal foundation—a custom ary method of foundation disbursement. Another major beneficiary is Dr. Arthur R. Jensen, an educational p^chologjst at -the University o f California, whose article iti 1969 (theorizing that intelHgraioe was hereditary touched o ff a furor over the value o f compensatory education for disadvantaged black students. Some Others Who Got Grants Dr. Travis Osborn o f the Univeraity o f Georgia, Dr. Frank C. J. McGurk and Dr. Audrey Shuey are other well-known researchers in the sam e area w ho got Pioneer grants. Two researchers known to le w special ists in the genetics field. Dr. Roger Pear son and Dr. Ralph Scott, also »>t sub stantial grants, which they decUned to discuss. Neither man is a geneticist. Theories o f racial linfefioriw pursued by Pioneer’s staff o f researchers have been widely diiscredited in recent years, some data d evelop ^ by Cyril Burt, a British scdenitist, which had underpinned the theory, are now alleged ,by leading geneticists to be without scientific value. In addition, at least one major assooia- tion of professional geneticists has pub licly decried the -use o f what it regards as questionable material on heredity and race to buttress political positions. However, Burke Judd, former secretary of the Genetics Society of America, and Hope Punnett, secretary of the American Society of Human Genetics, said that in principle they were in favor o f any legiti mate genetics research, even w hen it en compasses what some feel is an extrem e point o f view. “If you really believe in open research you’ve got to let these people do their ‘research’ and then let the rest Of us question It,” said Dr. Punnett. She said she did not take either Dr. Jensen or Dr. Schockley "too seriously” because she did not think they had developed good scientific Informatum to support their theories. Some Are Emtwrratted Other colleges that have accepted Pioneer grants for "eugenics and hered ity” research include the University of Callfomla at Berkeley, Univeraty of Georgfs, University of Southern Missls- s l i^ , Randolph-Macon College, Montana College o f Mineral Snettoe and Technol ogy mid the University o f Northern Ipwa. High officials of the last tw o schools said they new were embarrassed by the grants. They a^ced to remain anohy-' moua, on the ground that criticism h r them would auggest interference with academic freedom. It la not known w hathw Pioneer fi nanced research in fteldi other than heredity and eugenics. Spokesmen a t all the sdMOls who knew about the grants said they did not know the Pioneer Fund had been char tered for research in “racial betterment.” Nor did those scientists whom The Times w as able to reach who would answer questions. A spokesman for the University of California at Berkeley said its records showed no Pioneer grants to Dr. Jensen, although it did accept a Pioneer grant for a political science professor. Dr. Jensen confirmed that some of his grants came through the university. In each case the university, or another foundation, w as named as recipient of the grants, although the actual work was done by a specific professor in residence. This is common practice in grant-giving eveiywhere. However, in at least one school. North ern Iowa, the professor. Dr. Ralph Scott, used some of the money not only for re search but for anti-busing, anti-school- integration seminars in such off-campus places at Louisville and Boston, according to the school’s grants administrator. Quesion of Tax Exemption “This might put the fund’s tax-exempt status in jeopardy,” an Internal Revenue spokesman said when asked about gen eral rules applying to funds such as Pio neer. Under Federal law, such funds remain tax-exem pt as long as "no substantial part of the activity” is “carrying on prop aganda or otherwise attempting to influ ence legislation.” "You’re in a very sticky area,” the I.R.S. spokesman replied when asked about the definition of propoganda. Pio neer Fund is currently in a tax-exempt category applying to groups exclusively charitable, religious, testing and educa tional. Although it has been a major ‘banker” in the financing of research on race and genetics. Pioneer’s chief executive will not talk to reporters. Nor will some of the scientists who take its money ac knowledge their connection with Pioneer. The president of Pioneer Fund is Harry F. Weyher, a lawyer w hose office at 299 Park Avenue also is the fund’s office. Questioned by telephone about Pioneer, Mr. Weyher said, “It’s a client.” Then he added. “I’m not going to talk to you any more” and hung up. Mr. Weyher, several directors and the fund’s founder have had long-standing connections with conservative causes or political candidates, although no one has suggested that the conservatives in ques tion shared their interest in eugenics and heredity research. The founder, W ychffe P. Draper, a 1913 graduate of Harvard who died in 1972, was the reclusive heir to a Massachu setts textile-machinery fortune, according to published accounts. Two Committees Supported In the 1950’s and 1960’s Mr. Draper supported tw o now-defunct committees that gave grants for genetics research. Mr. Weyher was his lawyer. The commit tee members included Representative Francis E. Walter, chairman of the House Un-American Activities Committee; Henry E. Garrett, an educator known for his lief in the genetic Inferiority o f blacks, and Senator James 0 . Eastland o f Mis sissippi. When It wag disclosed in 1980 that Richard Arens, staff director for the Un- American Activitiet Committee, w as also a paid consultant to the Drap>er-financed cmnmittees, Mr. Arjpns w as forced to leava his Congressiorisl job. In 1960 puhUshed r ^ r t s quoted tom e teading American gen k ld sts m saying tiiey had turned down request! from Mr. Drapw to do research into theories at rtr clsl Irrferiorlty among blacks. Mr. Weyher, in a newspaper Intwview tlon and another on the Intelllgenoe of blacks by Dr. Shuey, a retired professor at the time, said Mr. Draper had already sponsored a book on restricting immigra- at Randolph-Macon. Woman’s College. Mr. Draper also gave m oney to right- wing political candidates, including the late Representative Donald Bruce of Indi ana, and the late Representative Walter, as well as to consen’ative lobbying or ganizations such as the American Coali tion o f Patriotic Societies. , When Mr. Draper died his estate turned over $1.4 million to the Pioneer Fund. Among tw o men listed as directors of Pio neer in 1975, the most recent year for which Internal Remenue Service records are available, is John B. Trevor of New York, a founder of the American Coali tion of Patriotic Societies, adviser to Billy James Hargis’s Cristian Crusade and au thor of an article on South Africa that ap peared in The Citizen, publication of the White Citizens Councils. Testifying against more liberal Immi gration laws in 1965, Mr. Trevor warned against “a conglomeration o f racial and ethnic elem ents” that he said led to “a serious culture decline.” The other Pioneer director is Thomas F. Ellis of Raleigh, N.C., manager of Jesse Helms’s 1972 campaign for Senator and an important backer of Ronald Reagan's 1976 Presidential campaign. Pioneer-sponsored research in eugenics, a movement devoted to improving the human species through control of hered itary factors in mating, and dysgenics, the study of trends in population leading to the deterioration of hereditary stock, is a subject of much dispute in the genet ics field. sources, the Gfnetics Society o f America, a leading professional organization, ta July 1976 It published a statement a! Its committee on genetics, race and Intelli gence that was endorsed by nearly 1,400 m em tos. “In our view s there is no convindng evidence as to whether there is or is not an appreciable genetic difference in in telligence between races,” it said. “Wei! designed resear^ . . . may yield valid and socially useful results and should not be discouraged. W* feel that geneticists can and must also speak out against the misuse or genetics for po litical purposes and the drawing of so cial conclusions from inadequate data.” Genetics and Busing When informed about Dr. Scott’s ao- tivities on busing at Northern Iowa, Pro- lessor Judd said it sounded contiaiy to normal academic practices for an educa tional, tax-exempt foundation to finance genetics research linked to the school busing controversy. “But I don’t have enough information,” he added. According to Northern Iowa officials. Dr. Scott is studying “forced busing and its rela*jonship to genetic aspects of Tn till* fifint* S An Tnesciqtabla Opinion’ Dr. Shockley, co-Inventor of the tran sistor, has for years been collecting material on eugendos and dysgenics re search. He said in a telephone interview a few days ago from his home in Palo Alto, Calif., that he had reached “the inescapable opinion that a major cause of American Negroes’ intellectual and social deficits is hereditary and racially genetic in origin.” This, he continued, “is not remediable to a major degree by practical improve ments in environment,” such as better schools, jobs or living conditions. He said he w as "very grateful” for Pioneer's grants. A spoksman for Stan ford said that $179,000 over 10 years to Dr. Shockley from Pioneer sounded cor rect, although the school did not have an exact dollar figure. The view s of Dr. Shockley and Dr. Jensen and their supporters, have come under attack recently from, among other educability.” In this context, he sent a graduate student to Mississippi and held seminars on busing, according to sources at the university. Dr. Scott, a professor of education, refused to comment on his research and to say whether its results had been published anywhere. i Roger Pearson, a B ritlsh-edu^ ted i econom ist who has been tha beneficiary 1 o f tw o Pioneer grants for work whlla he I was dean at Montana Tech, also refused to talk about his research. Such nonresponses art unusual In'tha field o f academic research openly spon sored by tax-exempt foundations. Stan ford, for eMunple, has a policy stating that “findings and conclusions" of research supported by outside grants “should be available for scrutiny and criticism.” Dr. Pearson, who served for the 1974- 75 acadMnic year as dean at Montana Tech before leaving by mutual consent in a disagreement over educational goals, got $60,000 from Pioneer while ho was there. Montana Tech officials said they had no idea that he apparently w as the same man who some years ago edited Western Destiny, a journal with many pro-South Africa, anti-Communist. and anti-raclai- mixing articles and who wrote a n ^ b e r of pamplets for flie conservative-onented Noontide Press such as “Eugenica and Race” and “Early Civilizations of the Nordic Race."