Folder
Miscellaneous Clippings (Folder)
Press
July 5, 1977 - February 18, 1979
7 pages
Cite this item
-
Division of Legal Information and Community Service, Clippings. Miscellaneous Clippings (Folder), 1977. 8301dc07-729b-ef11-8a69-6045bddc2d97. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/dd9ed1ef-9acc-4332-a5c1-7825dc717276/miscellaneous-clippings-folder. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
16-C C b f Atlanta gnurnal and CQNSTm TION SUNDAY. FEBRUARY 18, 1979.
Atlanta Continued From Page 1-C
The two views, far from conliicting, are com
plementary, They look at the same coin from
opposite sides — from that of the old order
and the advancing guard, from north Atlanta
and south; from the side that has something to
lose, and the one that has much to gain.
One of the few points that they concede
to each other — and even then for different
reasons — is that there are two Atlantas.
That is not an indictment of Atlanta. It
Simply means that the place once known as
“the world’s next great city” has something in
common with the rest of urban America.
Yet there is a sense here that Atlanta
-w asn ’t supposed to be that way — not for
'blacks or for whites. There is a buoyant, some-
» times boosterish perception that Atlanta is
Thniquely equipped with the resources for the
Jnterracial Good Society.
The shared affection for the city among
■•people of both races is viewed as the leavening
'Jthat could eventually pull black and white
.^ tlantans into a full partnership.
> But in some cases, it has caused bitter
^disappointments. Newcomers of both races
^ h o have read about the “city too busy to
^ a t e ” say they are surprised once they get
‘ here to find city life so segregated. One black
jTicwcomer sneers about Atlanta’s “alleged
• amage.”
The image grew from the 1950s and
H;1960s when Atlanta, unlike her southern neigh-
• ^ r s , bad an enlightened white leadership that
-Impt up communications with the city’s black
; leaders — mainly the black aristocracy — on
an array of public concerns.
The large black middle class then and
;now had the institutional support of Atlanta
University Center, a five-college educational
«nd professional resource for Ute black com-
dnunity unparalleled in other southern cities.
'Then came the election of Mayor May
nard Jackson in 1973. He was the first black
•'^elected to the top post in a major southern
•city and his election enhanced the city’s pro-
1 gressive image among outsiders. From within
,”Atlanta's black community, it was viewed as
the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow —
• the chance for slices of the economic pie.
In the public sector, Jackson h ^ gener-
’ ated visible black advances. ’Through his joint
•' venture and affirmative-action programs to
extend city contracts to black businesses, the
percentage of city contract funds going to
.minority-owned firms has risen from 2 percent
in 1972 to almost 25 percent in 1977.
In City Hall, the managerial positions
Jicld by blacks rose from 19 percent to 28 pcr-
' cent in Jackson’s first term, and 45 percent of
' h is appointments to cabinet-level and bureau
- director’s posts went to minorities.
r “Anybody who says Maynard hasn’t
- helped the black person’s position in Atlanta’s
economy has been asleep or can’t see,” says
;Cordy, one of a small, but growing group of
• black entrepreneurs who have won city con-
' tracts since Jackson’s election. “He has defi-
; nitely made a difference as far as minority
businesses go.”
Yet when the score was called early this
month in a study of black and white participa-
• tion in the Atlanta economy, the black position
j;till appeared dismally Weak.
- The report released by Jan Douglass,
; head of Atlanta's Community Relations Com-
Imission surveyed 53 white-owned corporations,
representative of the city’s power structure,
and found that blacks held only three of 458
• positions on their governing boards.
Millionaire businessman Jesse Hill, the
first black president of the Chamber of Com-
■fnerce, held two of the posts, and Cordy held
, Jhe other one.
The findings reflect the gap between
•everage black and white income, which the
D 970 census reported at |14,150 for whites and
,'$7,300 for blacks. The 1980 census is expected
■to show an even wider gap.
The report said the board room study
"seems like statistics from the 1950s and not
the progress one would expect from a bustling
and growing metropolis of the 1980s.”
The finding sent squirms of discomfort
tlirough the white community, particularly in
-business sectors. Some said it simply went too
^ a r , too fast, that blacks were asking for too
•wnuch, that corporate board rooms are no
t^lace for social engineering.
There was also a more anguished re
sponse from the considerable sector of down
town white business leadership that sees a
movement, although halting, toward a more
■equitable sharing of power.
Corporate boards turn over once in a
generation, while city hails can change every
four years, they said. “If I were a minority, I’d
expect more progress on ail fronts,” says the
•chamber’s Hammal. “But I just don’t think it
happens that way. It is a more gradual proc-
:.ess. It is happening and it will come.”
Meanwhile, the report was greeted with
’little surprise in the black community, where
.* it was widely cited as proof that “institutional
• racism” still keeps blacks under white thumbs
' in Atlanta.
"I really don’t think white men plot to
• keep their boards all white,” says Kay
: McKenzie, a prominent northsider with strong'
; liberal credentials, whose husband is a Georgia
Power executive. “I know some of them are
looking now for black members, but in the
past, they have looked to the people they know
. through business and social experience. And
those are white men.”
Even as the debate goes on, there is a
growing group of Atlantans who do not take
part in it — the underclass.
They are the poor, huddled into the city’s
ghettos and its 15,252 public housing units,
; where the battles against rats, r o a c l^ dis-
; ease, drugs and death take precedence over
questions about who owns what in downtown
' Atlanta.
Almost all of them are black, but they
make up a separate division within black
• Atlanta, perhaps so separate from the black
^middle class that they constitute a third
Atlanta. They are a testimony to the percep
tion that economic status is becoming at least
^ much of a divider as race.
While the black middle class with educa
tional and professional credentials has ad-
.vanced significantly, many of the poor see few
changes as a result of a City Hall run by a
mayor of their race. They have gained little
'Jpride from the election of a black chamber of
Tcommerce president.
“What joint venture is all about is a few
tbiack people who are already businessmen
while the welfare rolls grow,” says Dr. Charles
^King, who started Urban Crisis Inc. to study
.'and treat interracial tensions, “The politicians
Save to stay in power and so they have to
• compromise, diluting their black intensity.
This ^ s n ’t explained to the l ^ k masses.
Staff Photo—Bitty Dowr»
BLACKS AND WHITES WORK TOGETHER ON GEORGU POWER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
(L-R) Sam Dumas, Richard Johoson, Jim Davis and Bob Hughes
They heard the promises and they expected to
be rescued."
The result has been a growing alienation
of the poor from the more prosperous Atlan
tans of both races. Ethel Matthews, president
of the Fulton County welfare rights organiza
tion and a former domestic, says she distrusts
both the white and black middle classes.
“Poor blacks are discriminated against
by whites and blacks,” says the mother of 10
who arrived here 30 years ago from an Ala
bama plantation. “Some rich blacks will crush
you more than some whites. I watch the white
man and I also watch the black man. Because
when you are in a certain class, you have to
watch them.”
She speaks of vast improvements in race
relations since she arrived, but adds, “even if
you find some good white folks, it’s difficult to
trust them b^ause you’re always thinking
about what your forefathers had to go up
against.”
Personal relationships are beside the
point, says the Rev. Hosea Williams, field
organizer for the late Dr. Martin Luther King
Jr. during the civil rights movement, and the
persistent standard bearer of Atlanta’s “have
nots.”
“Personally, I have the best race rela
tions of anybody in Atlanta,” says Williams,
who has led pickets of many downtown busi
nesses, demanding more jobs and support of
black institutions.
He speaks of a conspiracy of the white
power structure and the black middle class
against the poor, calling Jackson and other
black leaders who have establishment white
support “pawns” of the white economic
powers.
“The whites have now put blacks into the
position the white oppressors previously held,”
be says, his raspy voice rising to preacher’s
heights. “They don’t beat your head anymore,
but now you’ve got less opportunity to survive
in the system. If they whup me on my head, it
puts a knot on my head, but it goes away. If
they force me to live as a second<lass citizen
and dehumanize me, it puts a knot on my life.”
“The black middle class!” Williams ex
claims in exasperatioa “They really don't be
lieve they’re black. They talk about art rather
than the rats and roaches in the projects. They
don’t want to eat at Paschals anymore, they
go to the Midnight Sun___
“Atlanta always been the home of the
richest and most powerful Uncle Toms in
America.” When asked to name them, he re
fused: “I’ve gotten too Uncle Tom myself to
call their names.”
Williams is often discounted among both
blacks and whites as a “rabble roliser,” but in
the recent indictment of City Councilman Ar
thur Langford, his cries of racially inspired
persecution gained currency throughout the
establishment black community.
“It’s a sign of how insecure the com
munity is, how tentative the gains feel,” says a
close Jackson associate. “The slide down is so
much faster than the climb up.”
The question marks still loom large. As
an era of shortages advances on the entire na
tion, will the shrinking pie become the basis of
racially inspired competition and hostilities in
Atlanta? Are the historic fears and suspicions
still alive enough to be fanned?
In short, could Atlanta be rocked with bit
ter racial violence like older, northern coun
terparts have experienced in the last decade?
Atlantans of both races say the city’s
strongest antidote to that sort of polarization
lies with the white business leadership, which
holds the purse strings.
Despite regular confrontations and cool
ings off between City Hall and major
downtown business leaders, there appears to
be a growing acceptance of each otter — not
necessarily as separate forces, but as potential
partners.
“Atlanta has a unique ingredient,” says
contractor Tom Cordy, who does not mince
words in criticizing the drags on minority busi
ness advancement. “We have a white business
community that will listen to black business
men. As long as we have the lines of com
munication open, we have a chance.”
Time is running out, though,' leaders of
both races tend to agree. Segregated housing
patterns, together with white flight, have left
the city’s public schools with only 10 percent
white enrollraenL
As they assess the seriousness of the
city’s racial problems, black and white Atlan
tans again perceive vastly different trends
from their separate communities. Their disa
greement could have grave implications:
“Things are getting better,” says Dan
Sweat, executive director of the powerful busi
ness group, Central Atlanta Progress. "They're
just getting more complicated,”
Morehouse’s Dr. Anna Grant expects,
however, to see "some real frustration with
the escalating cost of living and attrition of
human services. The factories and the jobs are
out in the suburbs and the hard core poor are
in the city, without access.
“Once upon a time, poor people were
very humble. But now they feel they are enti
tled to some of these services. They're more
demanding. We could have some serious prob
lems, any city could.”
A Place to Live or a Place to Exist?
Slje A tla n ta S o u m a l
THE ATLANTA CONSTITUTION
SUNDAY , FEBRUARY 1 8 , 1 9 7 9 Petspcctive SECTION
W hat is it like to live in Atlanta? Is the quality of life
here better or worse than other cities in the country? Is
Atlanta really the "world’s next great city" or is it just
another of America’s troubled urban centers?
A team of Atlanta Journal reporters has taken a
serious look at the city to try to answer those
questions. They looked at 10 areas — race, housing,
education, crime, health, transportation, environment,
entertainment, government and economy.
What they found will probably trouble the city’s
boosters and surprise its detractors. This first
installment is about race relations.
The series will run each Sunday in the Perspective
section.
R o ’ c l o c k Blacks and whites in Atlanta work together throughout the day, but
^ ^ when S o’clock conies, they go their separate ways. The photos aboveW orld and below are extreme situations, but they illustrate the point.
POPULATION
By DALE RUSSAKOFF
And JOE GREEN
Jounvif Staff Writers
“I feel that Atlanta can take real pride in the field o f race relations. ”
— Whitenortbside Atlanta woman-
"There’s always ‘good race relations’ when whites are in control of.
blocks **
— The Rev. Hosea Williams
It’s no coincidence that blacks and whites here speak of Atlanta as if they
live in two different cities.
They do.
Each has its power center downtown — one in Atlanta City Hall and the
other in the city’s private corporate board rooms. One holds the city’s political
reins, tee other its purse strings.
Neither can survive without tee other, and during tee day, they mingle
freely — in offices, over lunch, on tee streets, in task force meetings. One-on-
one, they are perhaps as comfortable with each other as are blacks and whites
anywhere in the United States.
But by five o’clock tee separate worlds reassert themselves. Blacks go
home to Atlanta’s south side, whites to tee north, bote acutely aware of what
they have — and what they don’t.
The race issue has faded in public intensity, but it continues to fix its
stam p on every social pattern in Atlanta — housing, schooling, employment,
social life, politics. It is so historically woven into tee city’s fabric that it is at
work even when it seems not to be there a t all.
“You have a black community teat controls the political power and a
white community teat controls tee economic power. And we’ve not agreed yet
on how we should proceed to share with each other,’’ says Tom Hamall, execu
tive vice president of the Atlanta Chamber of Commerce.
Hamall says “yet” often as he dis
cusses race relations in the South’s
premier city. He perceives a natural
and steady, if slow, move toward true
integration — economic and social.
Tom Cordy, a young and accom
plished black mechanical contractor
and native Atlantan, speaks with less
optimism. He says major lending and
bonding institutions were closed to him
unUl recently, despite his business’ suc
cessful track record. _ _
“Nobody is going to give up power
voluntarily. You either take it or you
don’t get it,” says Cordy, who sits on
the board of First Georgia Bank, the
first black to do so.
In dozens of interviews, black and
white Atlantans diverged aiong racial
lines as they discussed perceptions of
their city. Even the sociologists — who
study the same statistics and social
relations — come up with different per
spectives.
Dr. Anna Grant, chairman of the
Morehouse sociology department, notes
the black political gains, but speaks
more of an Atlanta plagued by “institu
tional rac ism ” — nearly exclusive
white dominance of private institutions
like the banks, tee media and utilities.
Dr. Fred Crawford, working across
town at Emory University’s Center for
Research in Social Change, notes the
historic drags pn black advancement
but concludes, “I think blacks now have
so much they ought to count the suc
cesses — economic opportunity, jobs,
independence, equality.”
Whites, regardless of their political
persuasions, speak of how far blacks
have come; blacks single out the barri
ers still blocking their paths.
Whites point to a black mayor,
black top police officials, black school
board leaders and — until his term
ended recently — a black Chamber of
Commerce president. Many of teem say
blacks have “taken over the city.”
Most blacks interviewed say they
suspect a white plot to “take tee city
back” politically. With 40 percent of tee
population, white Atlantans own more
than 95 percent of tee city’s wealth, ac
cording to a recent study.
See ATLANTA Page 16-C
SCHOOLS
TOP-LEVEL
CITY HALL JOBS
SHARE OF WEALTH
The independent weekly education newspaper published by the National School Public Relations Association
Washington, D.C./January 9, 1978
Vol. 20, No. 19
etoetjem
Q Who's getting what
for how many under
funding for handicap
ped (p.l40)
O
monitor
3 Alaska court suit
to test ambiguities in
Lau "remedies" (p.l43)
MoAAy thcut too
many zducatlonat
A C A eoA cneA A tiv&. vqa-
b a tty btyond thoAJi
in toZ ltctiiaJi mtan&.^
Ewald B. Nyquist
TRACKING AND NOT MONEY
BIGGEST FACTOR IN COLLEGE ACCESS
"Pouring substantially more money" into student aid
for higher education probably won't make much, of a dif
ference in who gets to college in the long run. What
could significantly influence college attendance is a
better understanding of the tracking systems in high
schools. These are some of the conclusions of a review
of almost 40 studies on access to college, based on data
from the National Longitudinal Study (NLS) of the 1972
high school class. There have been three follow-up sur
veys of the more than 23,000 graduates selected for the
sample. The long-term research project is sponsored by
the National Center for Education Statistics.
Motivation, parental expectations and a student's
perceptions of the value of a college education are major
determinants of college enrollment. And money is not as
important as is generally supposed, according to a recent
issue of Educational Researcher (Vol. 6, No. 11). "The
class factor in college access is the end product of a '
host of deficits that^ in fact, probably begin to accu
mulate before a child enters first grade," write research
ers Samuel Peng, J.P. Bailey Jr. and Bruce Eland.
So far, the NLS shows that the effects of sex and
race differences in attending college are declining. When
social class and scholastic aptitude are controlled,
blacks of both sexes are more likely than whites to attend
college. Men are still more likely to attend college than
women, although this is not true for blacks. The pervasive
factor, the researchers emphasize, is social class, which
operates independent of other variables. "Even if a stu
dent from a lower socioeconomic class had good grades and
high aptitude and was enrolled in an academic curriculum,"
thej say, "his/her chances of going to college were still
subst^atially less than an upper middle-class student with
the same credentials."
V.licn compared to previous studies, the NLS indicates
that the rate of enrollment at (cont. on last page)
f'jjKl 19.'5 -Njfionjl StLooI fufjl 137
EDUCATION U .S .A . The Independent
Weekly Education Newspaper. Published
each Monday by the National School Pub
lic Relations Association, 1801 N. Moore
St., Arlington, Va. 22209. Second-class
postage paid at Arlington, Va. Index twice
yearly. Suliscriplion price $39 a year.
Address editorial and subscription corre
spondence to EDUCATION U.S.A. Tcle-
• phones: Editors: (703) 528-6560. Subscrip
tion Desk: (703) 528-6771.
Editorial D irecto r: John H . W herry
Executive Ed ito r: Anne C . Lewis
’ Associate Ed ito r: David C . Savage
Sen io r Ed ito r: jenny M cAllister
Research A ssistant: Janet Eaffy
Contributing Editors: Robert W . Cole, B.
Rodney Davis, Peggy Odell Gonder, J.
W illiam Jones, George N eill, Shirley Boes
N eill, Robert Olds, Rose Marie Scott-Blair.
Staff: Editorial Services, Cynthia Menand;
Business Services, Mildred S. Wainger;
Production Services, Deborah Lucckese.
Cooperating Organizations. EDUCATION
U.S.A . is published in cooperation with
the American Assn, of School Adminis
trators, American Assn, of School Li
brarians, Assn, for Supervision and Cur
riculum Development, Assn, of School
Business Officials of the United States
and Canada, Council of Chief Slate School
Officers, National Assn, of Elementary
School Principals, National Assn, of Sec
ondary School Principals, National Assn,
of Slate Boards of Education and National
Congress of Parents and Teachers.
Microfilm editions from University Micro
films, 3(X) N. Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, Mich.
48106.
Tracking Biggesl Factor
(cont. from first page) two-year junior and com
munity colleges almost doubled in a decade. Enrollment
in four-year colleges declined slightly, and there was
a marked decline at vocational-technical schools. The
degree of selectivity at the colleges also makes a dif
ference. Most of the black students (71%) attending four-
year colleges enroll at those that do not have strict
selectivity standards. This complicates the problem of
equality of educational opportunity, according to the re
searchers. "If the majority of blacks or other ethnic
minorities are enrolling in institutions in which the
prospects for personal advancement or career development
are substantially lower than average, then focusing only
on total enrollment rates can be misleading," they say.
The research shows that hiah school tracking is the
single most powerful predictor of college attendance. It
is not surprising that students in academic high school
programs are more likely to attend college, but various
studies also substantiate that non-academic programs def
initely have the effect of negative labeling and stigma
tizing. Students in these tracks have lower class rank,
math achievement scores and self-concepts and less contact
with peers who are college-bound. "An adequate understand
ing of who goes ̂ to college ultimately requires understand
ing far more than we do at present about the Internal
structuring of the high school curriculum and what social
forces guide students into one track or another," the re
searchers emphasize. And an equally disturbing finding
in the study is that a larger number of highly able stu
dents, as determined by the verbal SAT, do not attend
college, compared to a decade ago. Hopefully, say the
researchers, further NLS analysis will find out if this
talent has been lost to society or has found other outlets.
O
o
EDUCATION U.S.A ./January 9,1978
!)N U.S.A.
j Jtrit j j ’ ■ n .».j t -j m
Pulilishcd by National School Public Relations Association
1801 North M oore Slieet
Arlington, V irg in ia 22209
SECOND CLASS
i^OSTAGE PA ID
A RLIN G TO N ,
V IR G IN IA
0 9 K A S H M C C U U P 7 ^ 3 T 0 1
20005 O
Library of Congress
In the Shadow of Southern History
By Eli Evans
Some years ago, during my first few
days in New York, I was driving up
Third Avenue when a car forced me
over to the curb. I prickled with that
rush of fear o f random violence that
new arrivals instinctively fee! in the
big city. The window rolled down so
that I could see a black couple with
kids piled in the back seat. The man
hollered in an unmistakable accent,
“Hey, man, where in North Carolina
y ’air from?” “Durham,” I answered,
relieved to know that it w as only my
license plate that had attracted his
attention. “We’re from Rocky Mount,”
he said. “Sure is good to see some
home folks.” We laughed and the kids
waved goodbye.
I haven’t thought much about that
incident since then, but it came back
1 to me recently during a trip to Nash-
Y r tle , where a white bus driver reacted
\to the mention of New York City
w obiefus. “Let ’em squirm,” he said.
they can’t pay their bills, to hell
w ^ 'em. Let ’em just go into bank
ruptcy like they deserve.”
w most Southerners and members
of Congress too. New York City is a
seetiging center of ethnic conflicts,
briinrt^ing with corruption, narcotics,
garbage and crime.
But to e folks down home are labor
ing under a m assive misconception.
The truth is. New York City and the
.Smith are linked by history into a
permanent relationship that adds enor
mous irony to the current one-sided
discussion of urban problems.
A major domestic political issue of
the Carter Presidency is whether non-
urban Representatives and Senators
can be persuaded to help break the
downward spiral of the major Ameri
can cities. Sweeping welfare reform,
changes in housing policy, and the rest
o f the urban agenda will always have
to struggle to attract Southern and
Midwestern votes in Congress unless
funds for cities are coupled with pro
grams for rural areas.
But urban ills and rural discontent
are rarely related in Congressional
debates though migration connects
them together, as tw o sides o f the
same problem. Jimmy Carter won the
Presidency with a unique coalition of
Southern and Northern voters. They
might be activated to support a com
prehensive package of urban and rural
programs based on a frank discussion
o f the Southern roots of the urban
crisis. »
Recently, a Southern Regional
Council Task Force on Southern Rural
Development (which included then
Gov. Jimmy Carter and tw o future
Cabinet officers— Commerce Secretary
Juanita Kreps and Labor Secretary
Ray Marshall) urged that the Federal
Government formulate a national rural
development policy, consolidate cur
rent rural programs into a new agency
or department and support a National
Rural Development Bank aimed at
small farmers and businesses in grow
ing small towns. The report, entitled
“Increasing the Options,” pointed out
that 4.5 million blacks live below the
poverty line in the 'South, more than
half in nonmetropolitan areas. They
are being lured to Southern and North
ern cities, the report said, in a migra
tion stream that connects rural non
development to continuing urban
problems. "To ignore one at the ex
pense of the other,” said Vanderbilt
president Alexander Heard, the task
force chairman, “is virtually to guar
antee that neither will be solved.”
The city cannot escape the shadow
of Southern history and the statistics
prove it. Since the Depression, the
movement of blacks to the North has
represented one of the most massive
movements of populations in American
history. During the 1940’s, approxi
mately 1.6 million blacks left the
South; during the 1950’s, about 1.5
million and during the 1960’s, about
1.4 million. Most of the blacks came
North in a state of despair. Depression
farm prices plummeted at the same
time mechanization in the cotton fields
made black hands superfluous. The
descendants of the freed slaves found
them selves trapped in the new 20th-
century slavery of unwanted labor and
foreclosures.
They looked North for the same
reason that European immigrants had
flocked to New York City through the
19th century — blacks saw in its
bustling streets and economic vitality
the golden door of hope, the possibility
of jobs, escape from the chains of
hunger and poverty. To the ethnic
immigrants from a generation earlier,
the needs o f the black newcomers
struck a deep response. The welfare
add-on of 25 percent that is a major
factor depleting the future of New
York City today came from New
York’s m ost generous impulses. The
second generation of the Jewish and
Catholic immigrants wanted to insure
that the new black immigrants would
not have to suffer the indignities of
the world of their fathers.
Farm-to-city migration continues,
but growing Dixie ghettos are the
new destination. Even though welfare
payments in New York City still ex
ceed those in som e Southern states by
a four-to-one ratio, 6D percent of all
rural black migration is now going to
Southern cities like Atlanta, New
Orleans and Birmingham. The North
ern big cities are not alone even if
New York City’s troubles dominate
the headlines.
Nor do the statistics always reflect
realities. For the first time, in the pe
riod between 1970-1975, for example,
the Census Bureau reported a sharp
drop-off in migration trends, with the
number of blacks leaving the South
about equal to the numbers returning.
Experts believe, however, that middie-
class and skilled blacks are going
back to jobs in the booming Southern
and Southwestern cities while the poor
are still coming North from rural
areas and small towns.
The migration is not all black.
Jimmy Carter remembers a boyhood
in the struggling South when whites
as well as blacks tried to eke out a
living with a plow and a lot of luck.
He knows that millions of whites also
fled to the urban centers from Ap
palachia and the rural South—^more
than 3 million since 1940.
The welfare problem, then, is a
national crisis that deserves a 200-year
perspective to understand; it is a living
descendant from the dark side o f
America’s past. It is not only New York
City’s problem nor is migration of the
poor , just a black phenomenon. (In
deed, the American urban problems
created by migration from Puerto Rico
and Mexico can also be viewed as a
rural development issue.)
If the only solution to New York
City piobiems continues to be program
cutbacks, rising taxes and fleeing in
dustries (the Northeast lost 781,000
manufacturing jobs between 1960-
1975), the time will come when the
Northern cities will become the mod
ern version of the rural shanties of
the Depression-wrecked old South—
oppressive, cold, uncaring and brutal
for the millions o f people who have
flocked here into a jobless chasm al
m ost as barren o f opportunity as the
land they left.
A small-town Southerner in the
White House with political constitu
encies both in the rural South and the
big cities can proclaim that urban
problems are one end of a pipeline
linked to rural poverty and cannot be
solved piecemeal. Combining rural de
velopment with urban initiatives
would find a responsive audience
among Southern Congressmen who are
growing more sensitive to the rising
numbers o f black voters.
An effective rural-urban coalition In
Congress will influence the decisions
in millions of families, both for those
people now in the rural South who
might migrate to cities North and
South, and for those in New York
Detroit, Chicago— black and white—
who might even choose the option of
going home if given half a chance.
Eli Evans, author of "The Provincials:
A Personal History of Jews in the
South," Will become president of the
Charles H. Revson Foundation in Oc
tober.
THE N E W YORK TIMES, SUNDAY, DECEMBER It, 1977
Fund Backs Controversial Study of ‘Racial Betterment’
By GRACE LICHTENSTEIN
A private trust fund based in New York
has for more than 20 y e a n supported
highly controversial research by a dozen
scientists who believe that blacks are
genetically less intelligent than whites.
The Pioneer Fund, a tax-exem pt foun
dation incorporated in 1937 for the ex
press purpose of research into “racial
betterment," was worth more than $2
million, according to its 1975 Internal
Revenue Service return. Yet several offi
cers of the leading geneticists' profession
al organization say they never heard of
it. A month-long study of the Pioneer
Fund’s activities by The New York Times
shows it has given at least $179,000 over
the last 10 years to Dr. William B. Shock-
ley, a leading proponent of the theory
that whites are inherently more intelli
gent than blacks.
Tt>e money w as paid through Stanford
University, where Professor Shockley
was a Noire! Prize-winning professor of
engineering science, as well as through
his own personal foundation—a custom
ary method of foundation disbursement.
Another major beneficiary is Dr. Arthur
R. Jensen, an educational p^chologjst
at -the University o f California, whose
article iti 1969 (theorizing that intelHgraioe
was hereditary touched o ff a furor over
the value o f compensatory education for
disadvantaged black students.
Some Others Who Got Grants
Dr. Travis Osborn o f the Univeraity
o f Georgia, Dr. Frank C. J. McGurk and
Dr. Audrey Shuey are other well-known
researchers in the sam e area w ho got
Pioneer grants.
Two researchers known to le w special
ists in the genetics field. Dr. Roger Pear
son and Dr. Ralph Scott, also »>t sub
stantial grants, which they decUned to
discuss. Neither man is a geneticist.
Theories o f racial linfefioriw pursued
by Pioneer’s staff o f researchers have
been widely diiscredited in recent years,
some data d evelop ^ by Cyril Burt, a
British scdenitist, which had underpinned
the theory, are now alleged ,by leading
geneticists to be without scientific value.
In addition, at least one major assooia-
tion of professional geneticists has pub
licly decried the -use o f what it regards
as questionable material on heredity and
race to buttress political positions.
However, Burke Judd, former secretary
of the Genetics Society of America, and
Hope Punnett, secretary of the American
Society of Human Genetics, said that in
principle they were in favor o f any legiti
mate genetics research, even w hen it en
compasses what some feel is an extrem e
point o f view.
“If you really believe in open research
you’ve got to let these people do their
‘research’ and then let the rest Of us
question It,” said Dr. Punnett. She said
she did not take either Dr. Jensen or Dr.
Schockley "too seriously” because she
did not think they had developed good
scientific Informatum to support their
theories.
Some Are Emtwrratted
Other colleges that have accepted
Pioneer grants for "eugenics and hered
ity” research include the University of
Callfomla at Berkeley, Univeraty of
Georgfs, University of Southern Missls-
s l i^ , Randolph-Macon College, Montana
College o f Mineral Snettoe and Technol
ogy mid the University o f Northern Ipwa.
High officials of the last tw o schools
said they new were embarrassed by
the grants. They a^ced to remain anohy-'
moua, on the ground that criticism h r
them would auggest interference with
academic freedom.
It la not known w hathw Pioneer fi
nanced research in fteldi other than
heredity and eugenics.
Spokesmen a t all the sdMOls who
knew about the grants said they did not
know the Pioneer Fund had been char
tered for research in “racial betterment.”
Nor did those scientists whom The Times
w as able to reach who would answer
questions.
A spokesman for the University of
California at Berkeley said its records
showed no Pioneer grants to Dr. Jensen,
although it did accept a Pioneer grant for
a political science professor. Dr. Jensen
confirmed that some of his grants came
through the university.
In each case the university, or another
foundation, w as named as recipient of
the grants, although the actual work was
done by a specific professor in residence.
This is common practice in grant-giving
eveiywhere.
However, in at least one school. North
ern Iowa, the professor. Dr. Ralph Scott,
used some of the money not only for re
search but for anti-busing, anti-school-
integration seminars in such off-campus
places at Louisville and Boston, according
to the school’s grants administrator.
Quesion of Tax Exemption
“This might put the fund’s tax-exempt
status in jeopardy,” an Internal Revenue
spokesman said when asked about gen
eral rules applying to funds such as Pio
neer.
Under Federal law, such funds remain
tax-exem pt as long as "no substantial
part of the activity” is “carrying on prop
aganda or otherwise attempting to influ
ence legislation.”
"You’re in a very sticky area,” the
I.R.S. spokesman replied when asked
about the definition of propoganda. Pio
neer Fund is currently in a tax-exempt
category applying to groups exclusively
charitable, religious, testing and educa
tional.
Although it has been a major ‘banker”
in the financing of research on race and
genetics. Pioneer’s chief executive will
not talk to reporters. Nor will some of
the scientists who take its money ac
knowledge their connection with Pioneer.
The president of Pioneer Fund is Harry
F. Weyher, a lawyer w hose office at 299
Park Avenue also is the fund’s office.
Questioned by telephone about Pioneer,
Mr. Weyher said, “It’s a client.” Then he
added. “I’m not going to talk to you any
more” and hung up.
Mr. Weyher, several directors and the
fund’s founder have had long-standing
connections with conservative causes or
political candidates, although no one has
suggested that the conservatives in ques
tion shared their interest in eugenics and
heredity research.
The founder, W ychffe P. Draper, a 1913
graduate of Harvard who died in 1972,
was the reclusive heir to a Massachu
setts textile-machinery fortune, according
to published accounts.
Two Committees Supported
In the 1950’s and 1960’s Mr. Draper
supported tw o now-defunct committees
that gave grants for genetics research.
Mr. Weyher was his lawyer. The commit
tee members included Representative
Francis E. Walter, chairman of the House
Un-American Activities Committee; Henry
E. Garrett, an educator known for his
lief in the genetic Inferiority o f blacks,
and Senator James 0 . Eastland o f Mis
sissippi.
When It wag disclosed in 1980 that
Richard Arens, staff director for the Un-
American Activitiet Committee, w as also
a paid consultant to the Drap>er-financed
cmnmittees, Mr. Arjpns w as forced to
leava his Congressiorisl job.
In 1960 puhUshed r ^ r t s quoted tom e
teading American gen k ld sts m saying
tiiey had turned down request! from Mr.
Drapw to do research into theories at rtr
clsl Irrferiorlty among blacks.
Mr. Weyher, in a newspaper Intwview
tlon and another on the Intelllgenoe of
blacks by Dr. Shuey, a retired professor
at the time, said Mr. Draper had already
sponsored a book on restricting immigra-
at Randolph-Macon. Woman’s College.
Mr. Draper also gave m oney to right-
wing political candidates, including the
late Representative Donald Bruce of Indi
ana, and the late Representative Walter,
as well as to consen’ative lobbying or
ganizations such as the American Coali
tion o f Patriotic Societies. ,
When Mr. Draper died his estate turned
over $1.4 million to the Pioneer Fund.
Among tw o men listed as directors of Pio
neer in 1975, the most recent year for
which Internal Remenue Service records
are available, is John B. Trevor of New
York, a founder of the American Coali
tion of Patriotic Societies, adviser to Billy
James Hargis’s Cristian Crusade and au
thor of an article on South Africa that ap
peared in The Citizen, publication of the
White Citizens Councils.
Testifying against more liberal Immi
gration laws in 1965, Mr. Trevor warned
against “a conglomeration o f racial and
ethnic elem ents” that he said led to “a
serious culture decline.”
The other Pioneer director is Thomas
F. Ellis of Raleigh, N.C., manager of Jesse
Helms’s 1972 campaign for Senator and
an important backer of Ronald Reagan's
1976 Presidential campaign.
Pioneer-sponsored research in eugenics,
a movement devoted to improving the
human species through control of hered
itary factors in mating, and dysgenics,
the study of trends in population leading
to the deterioration of hereditary stock,
is a subject of much dispute in the genet
ics field.
sources, the Gfnetics Society o f America,
a leading professional organization, ta
July 1976 It published a statement a! Its
committee on genetics, race and Intelli
gence that was endorsed by nearly 1,400
m em tos.
“In our view s there is no convindng
evidence as to whether there is or is not
an appreciable genetic difference in in
telligence between races,” it said.
“Wei! designed resear^ . . . may yield
valid and socially useful results and
should not be discouraged. W* feel that
geneticists can and must also speak out
against the misuse or genetics for po
litical purposes and the drawing of so
cial conclusions from inadequate data.”
Genetics and Busing
When informed about Dr. Scott’s ao-
tivities on busing at Northern Iowa, Pro-
lessor Judd said it sounded contiaiy to
normal academic practices for an educa
tional, tax-exempt foundation to finance
genetics research linked to the school
busing controversy. “But I don’t have
enough information,” he added.
According to Northern Iowa officials.
Dr. Scott is studying “forced busing and
its rela*jonship to genetic aspects of
Tn till* fifint* S
An Tnesciqtabla Opinion’
Dr. Shockley, co-Inventor of the tran
sistor, has for years been collecting
material on eugendos and dysgenics re
search. He said in a telephone interview
a few days ago from his home in Palo
Alto, Calif., that he had reached “the
inescapable opinion that a major cause
of American Negroes’ intellectual and
social deficits is hereditary and racially
genetic in origin.”
This, he continued, “is not remediable
to a major degree by practical improve
ments in environment,” such as better
schools, jobs or living conditions.
He said he w as "very grateful” for
Pioneer's grants. A spoksman for Stan
ford said that $179,000 over 10 years to
Dr. Shockley from Pioneer sounded cor
rect, although the school did not have
an exact dollar figure.
The view s of Dr. Shockley and Dr.
Jensen and their supporters, have come
under attack recently from, among other
educability.” In this context, he sent a
graduate student to Mississippi and held
seminars on busing, according to sources
at the university.
Dr. Scott, a professor of education,
refused to comment on his research and
to say whether its results had been
published anywhere. i
Roger Pearson, a B ritlsh-edu^ ted i
econom ist who has been tha beneficiary 1
o f tw o Pioneer grants for work whlla he I
was dean at Montana Tech, also refused
to talk about his research.
Such nonresponses art unusual In'tha
field o f academic research openly spon
sored by tax-exempt foundations. Stan
ford, for eMunple, has a policy stating
that “findings and conclusions" of
research supported by outside grants
“should be available for scrutiny and
criticism.”
Dr. Pearson, who served for the 1974-
75 acadMnic year as dean at Montana
Tech before leaving by mutual consent
in a disagreement over educational goals,
got $60,000 from Pioneer while ho was
there.
Montana Tech officials said they had
no idea that he apparently w as the same
man who some years ago edited Western
Destiny, a journal with many pro-South
Africa, anti-Communist. and anti-raclai-
mixing articles and who wrote a n ^ b e r
of pamplets for flie conservative-onented
Noontide Press such as “Eugenica and
Race” and “Early Civilizations of the
Nordic Race."