Legal Defense Fund Takes Martin King Contempt Case to the U.S. Supreme Court

Press Release
June 20, 1966

Cite this item

Legal Defense Fund Takes Martin King Contempt Case to the U.S. Supreme Court preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 56760309-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 4. Legal Defense Fund Takes Martin King Contempt Case to the U.S. Supreme Court, 1966. 56760309-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/df4e830f-9b9c-4f45-a68a-ecd4381e65a2/legal-defense-fund-takes-martin-king-contempt-case-to-the-us-supreme-court. Accessed June 01, 2025.

Copied!

    10 Columbus Circle ZS 
New York, N.Y. 10019 
JUdson 6-8397 

Legal Defense and Educational’ Fitnd 
PRESS RELEASE 

LEGAL ‘DEFENSE FUND TAKES 
President 

as Hon. Francis E. Rivers MARTIN KING CONTEMPT CASE 

€ Director-Counsel JO. THE U.S. SUPREME COURT 

: Jack Greenberg 

ote WASHINGTON---The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. has 

asked the U. S. Supreme Court to review the Birmingham, Alabama con- 

tempt convictions of Rev. Martin Luther King and seven other civil 

rights leaders. 
i 

Legal Defense Fund attorneys po to overturn an Alabama 

Supreme Court ruling that held that Dr. King and his associates 

might be punished for disobeying an injunction issued to prohibit 

demonstration marches, Xe. ‘ 

The petition argues the key principle that, although citi- 

zens must obey.an injunction, if it is valid, etizens should not 

have to obey injunctions which prevent the exercise of constitu- 

tional rights of freedom of speech and assembly. 

The attorneys point to the famous case of the late John L, 

Lewis, former president of the United Mine Workers. 

This present case grew out of the famous Good Friday and Easter gy 

Sunday 1963 demonstrations of the Southern Christian Leadership 

Conference and the Alabama Christian iiovement for Human Rights. 

Convicted leaders, in addition to Dr. King, include 

Rev. ‘Ralph Abernathy, \lyatt Tee Walker, A.D. King (brother of Dr, 

King), Fred L. Shuttlesworth, also J. W. Hayes, T. L. Fisher and 

J.T. Porter. 

Legal Defense attorneys point out that Birmingham civil 

rights leaders did attempt to gecure parade permits prior to begin- 

ning demonstrations, These were denied by Police Chief Eugene 

"Bull" Connor. 

However, Chief Connor then sought issuance of an ex 
partesrestraining order forbidding demonstrations. 

The Negroes “marched in protest of Birmingham's rigid 
racial.codes despite the injunctions 

The leaders were found in contempt of court and sentenced 
to five, peys in jail and fined $50.00 by the local circuit court. 

The Alabama Supreme Court kept the case under advisement 
from spgust 22, 1963 until December 9, 1965. 

ee Legal Defense Fund attorneys include Jack Greenberg, 
James M, Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, Leroy D, Clark of New York 
City: Arthur D, Shores and Orzell Billingsley of Birmingham, Harry 
H. Watchtel and Benjamin Spiegel, of New York, were of counsel. 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 =e

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Legal Defense Fund Takes Martin King Contempt Case to the U.S. Supreme Court

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in