Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Lestrange Darrone Brief for Respondent

Public Court Documents
January 1, 1983

Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Lestrange Darrone Brief for Respondent preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Notice of Consolidation by Defendants-Appellees, 1969. 36ef4042-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4434fe0b-461b-44cf-9d3a-d705dfab81de/notice-of-consolidation-by-defendants-appellees. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI 

  

(Docketed in the United States Court of Appeals 
for the Fifth Circuit as Nos. 28030 & 28042) 
  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve. 

HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al. 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

{Civil Action No. 4075{(3)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

  

BUFORD A. LEE, et al. 

V. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve 

MILTON EVANS, Third Party 

Plaintiffs-Appellees 

(Civil Action No. 2034 (H)) 

Defendant-Appellant 

Defendant-Appellee 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve 

KEMPER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al. 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

(Civil Action No. 1373(¥)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve. 

NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED 
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

(Civil Action No. 3807(J)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve 

NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE 

SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

(Civil Action No. 1120(W)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

   



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve. 

MARION COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

  

JOAN ANDERSON, et al. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve. 

THE CANTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, 
and THE MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

ET AL. 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve 

SOUTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED 
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al 

  

BEATRICE ALEXANDER, et al 

Ve. 

HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 

et al. 

  

ROY LEE HARRIS, et al. 

Ve. 

THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 

et al. 

  

‘JOHN BARNHARDT, et al. 

Ve 

MERIDIAN SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et 

  

Plaintiff-Appellant 

(Civil Action No. 2178(H)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiffs-Appellants 

Plaintiff-Intervenor- 

Appellant 

Action No. 3700(J)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

Action No. 3984(J)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiffs-Appellants 

Action No. 37794(3)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiffs-Appellants 

Action No. 1209 (W)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiffs-Appellants 

Action No. 1300(E)) 

Defendants-Appellees  



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve 

NESHOBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

(Civil Action No. 1396(E)) 

et al. Defendants-Appellees 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ye 

NOXUBEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

{Civil Action No. 1372(E)) 

et al. Defendants-Appellees 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve. 

LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

{Civil Action No. 1367(R)) 

et al. Defendants-Appellees 

  

DIAN HUDSON, et al. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve 

LEAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al. 

Plaintiffs-Appellants 

Plaintiff-Intervenor- 

Appellant 

{Civil Action No. 3332(J)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

(Civil Action No. 2199(H)) 

COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL, 
et al. Plaintiff-Appellant 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

V2 

AMITE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

{Civil Action No. 3983(J)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Va 

COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

(Civil Action No. 2148(H)) 

et al. Defendants-Appellees 

   



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Vv. (Civil 

LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

  

JEREMIAH BLACKWELL, JR., et al. 

Ve 

ISSAQUENA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 

et al. 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. (Civil 

WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

  

CHARLES KILLINGSWORTH, et al. 

Ve. 

THE ENTERPRISE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL 
DISTRICT and QUITMAN CONSOLIDATED 
"SCHOOL DISTRICT 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve 

LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve 

PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE 
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Ve. 

FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

  

Plaintiff-Appellant 

Action No. 2216(H)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiffs-Appellants 

Action No. 1096 (W)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

Action No. 1160(W)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiff-Appellants 

Action No. 1302(E)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

Action No. 4294 (J)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

Action No. 1368(E)) 

Defendants-Appellees 

Plaintiff-Appellant 

Action No. 4256(J)) 

Defendants-Appellees  



  

TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI: 

You are hereby notified that the defendants-appellees (other 

than the United States of America) in all of the above causes 

which have been consolidated in the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit for the purposes of appeal under the above 

captions and docket numbers ALS preparing and will file with the 

Supreme Court of the United States a petition for writ of certi- 

orari. The petition for rehearing of the Suduhent entered and 

opinion rendered by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Civouts 

was entered on October 9, 1969, and this petition will be filed 

with the Supreme Court of the United States on or before January 

7, 1970. Rule 23(5) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the 

United States is as follows: 

5. Where several cases are sought to be reviewed on 
certiorari to the same court that involve identical 
or closely related questions, it shall suffice to 
file a single petition for writ of certiorari cover- 
ing all the cases. 

Under the Rules of the Supreme Court, including Rule 21 and 

Rule 24 (4) thereof, the petitioners are required to file a trans- 

cript of the record in the case or cases sought to be reviewed 

upon certiorari, which would, in these cases, include the entire 

appellate record of pleadings, proceedings, judgments, orders, etc. 

and the record in the United States District Court for the Southern 

 



  

District of Mississippi, which became a part of the record of 

the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upon appeal thereto 

by the appellants. 

You are hereby requested to certify and transmit to the 

Supreme Court of the United States the entire record in these 

proceedings in accordance with the Rules of the Supreme Court of 

the United States. 

Respectfully submitted, 

.) f J 

  
  

eg 

JUDGE A. F. SUMMER JOHN C. SATTERFIELD 

Attorney General of Post Office Box 466 
Mississippi Yazoo City, Mississippi 39194 
New Capitol Building : Special Counsel for the 

Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Petitioners, associated with 

other attorneys of record in 
each of the Consolidated Cases. 

IN BEHALF OF ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD 
FOR THE DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES EXCEPT 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE 

ABOVE STYLED CAUSES 

 



  

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
  

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Notice to 

the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Mississippi were served on the opposing counsel on 

this 29th day of December, 1969, by mailing copies of same, 

postage prepaid, to the last known address as follows: 

Melvyn R. Leventhal 
Reuben V. Anderson 
Fred L. Banks, Jr. 
John A. Nichols 

538-1/2 North Farish Street 
Jackson, Mississippi 39202 

Jack Greenberg 
Jonathan Shapiro 
Norman Chachkin 

Suite 2030 

10 Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 

Jeris Leonard h 
Assistant Attorney General 
Department of Justice 
Washington, D. C. 

Erwin N. Griswold 
Solicitor General 

Department of Justice 

Washington, D. C: 

Robert E. Hauberg 
United States Attorney 
Post Office Building 
Jackson, Mississippi 

rd { kl 
rd — 

/ < : ) 

{ rd 

  

John C. Satterfield

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top