Letter from Lani Guinier to Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet

Correspondence
August 27, 1982

Letter from Lani Guinier to Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet preview

Cite this item

  • Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Letter from Lani Guinier to Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet, 1982. abc582e6-e392-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e117e6ee-87bd-4f46-a4da-152952044b80/letter-from-lani-guinier-to-prof-elizabeth-bartholet. Accessed April 29, 2025.

    Copied!

    &esar@renseffi.

August 27, L982

Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet
Harvard Law School
Cambrldge, Massachusetts 02138

Dear Betsy:

r am representing two black women (ages 69 and sz) 1n
Arabama who have been convlcted of votlng fraud. They were
sentenced to foun and flve years ln prison. They had ex-
hausted alr direct appeals when LDF got involved in the
case.

There are a number of very interesting issues in thls
case on which students in the public rnterest Litigation
course may enjoy working. r certainly courd use their
he1p. This ls a case of selective prosecutlon of two ctvllrlghts actlvists who were organizlng the brack communlty in
Plckens county by assisting erderry people to vote absentee.

I need students to work on several constitutional issues(e.9., (1) was the statute charged in the indictment uncon-
stitutionar as appri-ed in right of its chilring effect onthe exercj-se of the right to vote subsequent to the con-viction and sentencing no bl-acks have voted absentee in
Pickens County; (2 ) was the judge,s charge to the jury on
crimes not named in the indictment a violation of defendants'
due process rights even in the absence of objections by
defense counsel- ) . r arso need help in compiring whatever
legislative history is avallable for a I98O Alabama statute
that changed the procedure for voting absentee.

r wourd love to discuss this project with you further.
Please give me a call when you return to Cambridge.

Siy>ereIy,
./

^ lz'',Y(urvt-V\-
Lani Guinier

LG:jj

Contributions are deductible lor U.S, income tar purposes

The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUN0 is not part ol the National Association lor the Advancement of Colored People allhough it
was lounded by it and shares its commitment l0 oqual rights. L0F has had lor over 25 years a separate Board, program, stalf, ollics and budget.

NAACP LEGAL OEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND. INC.
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 o (212) 586-8397

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top