Triangle Improvement Council v. Ritchie Brief Amicus Curiae

Public Court Documents
October 5, 1970

Cite this item

Triangle Improvement Council v. Ritchie Brief Amicus Curiae preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Brief submitted by National Housing and Economic Development Law Project. Date is approximate.

Impact area
- Economic Justice
Topic
- Economic Justice
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- aa280584-c69a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 3. LDF on Behalf of Watts Rioters (Telegram), 1965. c5a80c53-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5e51ac99-8489-4653-b416-ff930d6f308c/ldf-on-behalf-of-watts-rioters-telegram. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    /PoWESTIC SERVICE N 
far ined 

Send the following menase, subse ry d ; i ey 

(See sttashes List) te : tober 8, 1965 

“LES. De d attorneys will 
ei ) on behalf of 

atts area of 

s Municipal, | 
nsibility lp ton 

¢ Fund is a separate - 
ll hold a press confere ‘i a.m. tomo: fo 1d 

(Oct. 8 e press room of the Ambassa 1, Los Ang 195, Ga F 
‘He can be reached this evening at th of Atty. | arenas % 

Johnson, 4200 Don Mariano Dr., Los Angeles area code a 

: esse DeVore, Jr., Director 
lic Information 

d LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 
10 Columbus Circle, NYC 

[INTERNATIONAL SERVICE \ 
shes ofservicedesited; 

DOMEstic SERVICE \ 

N 

‘Check the class of sefviee desired) 
otherwise this testage will be 

“sent as a fase telegram 

TELEGRAMS 1906 (4-35) 
LETTER TELEGRAM DAY LETHER Se . | Awan we 

F a \ gaORESHiP NIGHT LETTER ? 

TIME FILED NO, WOS-CUMBE supe] PB OR eoLC ata) a) tae nT = 

eT, ee NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & ED FUND, 
Z =e LO Columbus N a3 

Sendthe following messase, subject 1 the 7 eherebyaxreed io =z “ 

(See Attached List) October 8, 1965 

ANGELES-- NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund attorneys will 
2 suit in California Supreme Court today on behalf of more than 

ons arrest<d during riots in the Watts area of Los Angeles. 

he suit alleges that 21 judges of the Los Angeles Municipal, 
and Superior Courts failed in their responsibility to appoint 
counsel to represent the defendants i the preliminary 

of the criminal proceedings. 

a: We anxious to know the reaction in your community to the 
Legal Datense Fund from a fund-raising and public relations point of 
view, We will contact you shortly for your comments, observations, 
and press clippings. 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director 
Public Information ‘ 

P oot Defense & Educational Fund 
NYC 10 Columbus Circle

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Triangle Improvement Council v. Ritchie Brief Amicus Curiae

Impact area

Topic

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in