Defense Fund Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Shuttlesworth Case

Press Release
February 16, 1962

Cite this item

Defense Fund Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Shuttlesworth Case preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- a86762fa-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. Defense Fund Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Shuttlesworth Case, 1962. a86762fa-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e337b075-3249-4dba-be55-4a8b9ba7d146/defense-fund-petitions-us-supreme-court-to-hear-shuttlesworth-case. Accessed November 23, 2025.

Copied!

    PRESS RELEASE 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
TO COLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEWYORK19,N.Y. e« JUdson 6-8397 
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS ; JACK GRE President Mo CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY 

ao Associate Counce 
B25 

DEFENSE FUND PETITIONS U. S. SUPREME COURT 
TO HEAR SHUTTLESWORTH CASE 

February 16, 1962 

NEW YORK - The U, S, Supreme Court was petitioned this week 

to review the convictions of Birmingham, Ala, Negro leaders 

Fred Shuttlesworth and Charles Billups. The ministers were 

arrested for inciting ten Negro students to conduct sit-in 

demonstrations in Birmingham in March, 1960. 

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund petition 

asks the high court to review a judgment of the Alabama 

Court of Appeals of May 30, 1961 which upheld the minister's 

convictions, 

Tried in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Rev. 

Shuttlesworth was sentenced to 180 days in jail and a $100 

fine, while Rev. Billups received the lesser sentence of 30 

days in jail and $25 fine. 

The two ministers were accused of inviting students 

from Daniel Payne College in Birmingham to Rev. Shuttlesworth's 

house on the night of March 30, 1960, where Rev. Shuttlesworth 

asked for volunteers to participate in sit-in demonstrations. 

The next day ten youths sat-in at five store lunch 

counters in Birmingham, They were arrested for "trespassing 

after warning," convicted and sentenced to thirty days hard 

labor and fined $100 each. Legal Defense Fund attorneys 

petitioned the U. S, Supreme Court to hear their cases last 

month, 

The ministers’ petition for certiorari becomes the tenth 

"sit-in" case pending before the U. S, Supreme Court. Five 

of the cases are from Virginia, two from Maryland, one from 

North Carolina, and two from Alabama. 

NAACP Defense Fund attorneys for the Negro ministers are 

Arthur D. Shores, Orzell Billingsley, Peter A. Hall, Oscar 

Adams, and J. Richmond Pearson of Birmingham, Ala.; and Jack 

Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Leroy Clark and James M, 

Nabrit, III, of New York City.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Defense Fund Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Shuttlesworth Case

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in