Background on Suit for Injunction to Permit Peaceful Picketing at Worlds Fair
Press Release
June 5, 1964

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 1. Background on Suit for Injunction to Permit Peaceful Picketing at Worlds Fair, 1964. 49e140e6-b492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e36377c3-5a31-47a3-9da1-ce262401e5bc/background-on-suit-for-injunction-to-permit-peaceful-picketing-at-worlds-fair. Accessed May 07, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle ) New York, N.Y. 10019 JUdson 6-8397 — NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund PRESS RELEASE President De Alan Knight Chalmers = Director-Counzel June 5, 196lf Jack Greenberg & Associate Counsel be Constance Baker Motley x “THE FOLLOWING IS PREPARED BY THE AACP LEGAL NSE AND EDUCATIONAL ‘FUND AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BACKGROUND FACTS ON SUIT FOR INJUNCTION TO ORDER WORLD'S FAIR TO PERMIT PEACEFU. AND ORDERLY PICKETING IN PUBLIC ARSAS INSIDE GROUNDS DECISION EXPECTED ANY DATE AFTER TUESDAY, JUNE 9 Civil rights leaders sought this injunction in order to conduct peaceful and orderly picketing and the distribution of handbills in the streets and other public areas at the 646- acre World's Fair. They argued that their constitutional rights to free speech and assembly under the First and Fourteenth Amendments are being denied by the Fair's policy prohibiting such activities and threatening arrest. , the City, State, and Federal governments subject it to the restraints of the Constitution against) interfering with free- eae dom of speech, even thougn it is a private corporation. Such. connections include’ the following: (the Fair has leased its property from the City; the City will®receive net revenue from the Fair for park improvements and other educational purposes;_ the City appropriated $2 million for work on the Fair site; = % City, State and.Federal funds totalling $12) million were used xt to accelerate road construction around the Fair; the Fair is : exempt from City and State taxes; all buildings and improve- ments will become City property when the Fair ends; and Fair policemen have the status of peace officers. Plaintiffs in the action were James Farmer, Executive Director of the Congress on Racial Equality; Eugene T. Reed, President of the New York State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P.35 Rev. Gardner Taylor, Pastor of Concord Baptist Church in rocks lyn; and Rev. Robert J. Stone, Assistant Director of the Pres— byterian Council on Religion and Race. They brought the suit Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Inf. ion—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 > - more - BACKGROUND FACTS ON -2- June 5, 1964 SUIT FOR INJUNCTION TO ORDER WORLD'S FAIR TO PERMIT PEACEFUL AND ORDERLY PICKETING IN PUBLIC AREAS INSIDE. GROUNDS 2 % an behalf of’ ethers similarly situated as well as themselves. They wore represented by Carl Rachlin, General Counsel of C.0.R.E.; by “Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, and Michael Meltsner of the N.A.C.P. Legal Defense and Educational Fund; and by Howard Squadron of New York. “the attorneys argued that the Fair's policy prohibiting pickets is unconstitutional on two grounds. First, the Fair's YTegulation sets no standards or guides for withholding permis- sion to exercise free speech, they said. Second, the policy has been applied three times in violation of fundamental liber- rf ies. Cited were the arrest of four Florida girls who were : engaged in orderly picketing of that state's Pavilion on April 28; ‘the arrest of twelve national officers of the American Jewish Congress who attempted peacefully to picket the Jordanian Pavilion on May 25; and the failure of the Fair to answer a May 20 telegram requesting permission for a reasonable number a of pickets to protest racial discrimination in front of the Florida and Louisiana Pavilions. Attorneys for the Fair contended in operation that the Fair grounds were not suitable for picketing in view of the large number of visitors, many of whom come liong distances, who pay admission and other fees to be amused and educated, Were picketing allowed, it was argued, “it will be a field day i for anarchy. Incidents, disturbances, disorders, bloodshed, — bs ta diminution of Fair attendance--these will, in all likelihood, be the result." i the Southern District of New York, suggested that Fair security guards might have been given the status of peace officers in order to protect orderly pickets as well as other persons who ee A might be in the area. Decision w CHRONOLOGY * May 20--Telegram to Fair President Robert Moses signed by C.0.R.E. - more =- : 3 -3- June 5, 1964 _ BACKGROUND FACTS ON SUIT FOR INJUNCTION TO ORDER WORLD'S FAIR TO PERMIT PEACEFUL AND ORDERLY PICKETING IN PUBLIC AREAS INSIDE GROUNDS General Counsel Carl Rachlin and NAACP Legal” Fund Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg request for a reasonable be granted entry and to picket in number of admission-paying). ersons to in order to disseminate in formation a peaceful and orderly manner in front of the Louisiana and Florida Pavilions. telegram as yet reced udge John M. Cash- Should not allow yler, Jr. Decision reserved, fAal day for filing documents with the Court. Decision 0 be handed down at an unspecified date thereafter.