Background on Suit for Injunction to Permit Peaceful Picketing at Worlds Fair
Press Release
June 5, 1964
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 1. Background on Suit for Injunction to Permit Peaceful Picketing at Worlds Fair, 1964. 49e140e6-b492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e36377c3-5a31-47a3-9da1-ce262401e5bc/background-on-suit-for-injunction-to-permit-peaceful-picketing-at-worlds-fair. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle )
New York, N.Y. 10019
JUdson 6-8397 —
NAACP
Legal Defense and Educational Fund
PRESS RELEASE
President
De Alan Knight Chalmers =
Director-Counzel June 5, 196lf
Jack Greenberg &
Associate Counsel
be Constance Baker Motley
x
“THE FOLLOWING IS PREPARED BY THE
AACP LEGAL NSE AND EDUCATIONAL
‘FUND AS A PUBLIC SERVICE
BACKGROUND FACTS ON SUIT FOR INJUNCTION
TO ORDER WORLD'S FAIR TO PERMIT PEACEFU.
AND ORDERLY PICKETING IN PUBLIC ARSAS INSIDE GROUNDS
DECISION EXPECTED ANY DATE AFTER TUESDAY, JUNE 9
Civil rights leaders sought this injunction in order
to conduct peaceful and orderly picketing and the distribution
of handbills in the streets and other public areas at the 646-
acre World's Fair. They argued that their constitutional
rights to free speech and assembly under the First and Fourteenth
Amendments are being denied by the Fair's policy prohibiting such
activities and threatening arrest. ,
the City, State, and Federal governments subject it to the
restraints of the Constitution against) interfering with free- eae
dom of speech, even thougn it is a private corporation. Such.
connections include’ the following: (the Fair has leased its
property from the City; the City will®receive net revenue from
the Fair for park improvements and other educational purposes;_
the City appropriated $2 million for work on the Fair site; = %
City, State and.Federal funds totalling $12) million were used xt
to accelerate road construction around the Fair; the Fair is :
exempt from City and State taxes; all buildings and improve-
ments will become City property when the Fair ends; and Fair
policemen have the status of peace officers.
Plaintiffs in the action were James Farmer, Executive
Director of the Congress on Racial Equality; Eugene T. Reed,
President of the New York State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P.35
Rev. Gardner Taylor, Pastor of Concord Baptist Church in rocks
lyn; and Rev. Robert J. Stone, Assistant Director of the Pres—
byterian Council on Religion and Race. They brought the suit
Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Inf. ion—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 >
- more -
BACKGROUND FACTS ON -2- June 5, 1964
SUIT FOR INJUNCTION TO
ORDER WORLD'S FAIR TO PERMIT
PEACEFUL AND ORDERLY PICKETING IN PUBLIC
AREAS INSIDE. GROUNDS
2 %
an behalf of’ ethers similarly situated as well as themselves.
They wore represented by Carl Rachlin, General Counsel
of C.0.R.E.; by “Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, and
Michael Meltsner of the N.A.C.P. Legal Defense and Educational
Fund; and by Howard Squadron of New York.
“the attorneys argued that the Fair's policy prohibiting
pickets is unconstitutional on two grounds. First, the Fair's
YTegulation sets no standards or guides for withholding permis-
sion to exercise free speech, they said. Second, the policy
has been applied three times in violation of fundamental liber-
rf
ies. Cited were the arrest of four Florida girls who were :
engaged in orderly picketing of that state's Pavilion on April
28; ‘the arrest of twelve national officers of the American
Jewish Congress who attempted peacefully to picket the Jordanian
Pavilion on May 25; and the failure of the Fair to answer a
May 20 telegram requesting permission for a reasonable number a
of pickets to protest racial discrimination in front of the
Florida and Louisiana Pavilions.
Attorneys for the Fair contended in operation that the
Fair grounds were not suitable for picketing in view of the
large number of visitors, many of whom come liong distances,
who pay admission and other fees to be amused and educated,
Were picketing allowed, it was argued, “it will be a field day i
for anarchy. Incidents, disturbances, disorders, bloodshed, — bs ta
diminution of Fair attendance--these will, in all likelihood,
be the result." i
the Southern District of New York, suggested that Fair security
guards might have been given the status of peace officers in
order to protect orderly pickets as well as other persons who
ee A
might be in the area. Decision w
CHRONOLOGY
*
May 20--Telegram to Fair President Robert Moses signed by C.0.R.E.
- more =-
: 3
-3- June 5, 1964
_ BACKGROUND FACTS ON SUIT FOR
INJUNCTION TO ORDER WORLD'S FAIR
TO PERMIT PEACEFUL AND ORDERLY
PICKETING IN PUBLIC AREAS INSIDE GROUNDS
General Counsel Carl Rachlin and NAACP Legal”
Fund Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg request
for a reasonable
be granted entry
and to picket in
number of admission-paying). ersons to
in order to disseminate in formation
a peaceful and orderly manner in front
of the Louisiana and Florida Pavilions.
telegram as yet reced
udge John M. Cash-
Should not allow
yler, Jr. Decision reserved,
fAal day for filing documents with the Court. Decision
0 be handed down at an unspecified date thereafter.