Ask Halt of Federal Cash to Tennessee Urban Renewal Project
Press Release
December 22, 1965

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 4. Ask Halt of Federal Cash to Tennessee Urban Renewal Project, 1965. fb168269-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e43cf263-f2fb-425b-943d-734519e2dbf8/ask-halt-of-federal-cash-to-tennessee-urban-renewal-project. Accessed May 20, 2025.
Copied!
President Hon. Francis E. Rivers PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel egal efense lund Jack Greenberg NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Sages 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 etna . eres FOR RELEASE THURSDAY December 22, 1966 ASK HALT OF FEDERAL CASH TO TENN. URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT Rights Attorneys Taking Hard Look At Urban Renewal Patterns WASHINGTON---The U, S, Department of Housing and Urban Development today received a complaint from the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) calling for the halt of urban renewal funds for Pulaski, Tennessee. This complaint, the last remedial remedy prior to formal litigation, sets the stage for a new thrust of litigation against local urban renewal agencies across the nation which overlook rights of Nogro city dwellers. The LDF is also asking the Department of Housing for a prompt hearing on this complaint, asserting that the proposed Westside Urban Renewal Project deprives Negro complainants of equal protection of the laws and due process under the 14th Amendment. Jack Greenberg, LDF Director-Counsel, stated: "Urban renewal has too often consisted of Negro removal. Until now, apart from a case which the LDF won in Nashville in 1964, the courts have not protected the rights of Negroes against this threat. "We have just furnished our 250 cooperating attorneys with legal materials spelling out means of enforcing the right of Negro citizens against being uprooted and then compressed further into the ghetto. "This proceeding is the first in a series." The Pulaski Housing Authority, despite formal requests for con- sideration by Negroes, has proposed a project that would remove Negroes from a highly desirable area. LDF attorneys point out that local Pulaski officials are in vio- lation of federal statutes in that no dwellings “conforming to urban renewal standards are available to persons to be displaced who are ineligible for public housing." Other violations of federal law cited in the LDF complaint stem from the fact that: * displaced persons ineligible for public housing are being offerec vacant lots. * these vacant lots are “located in areas clearly less desirable than the proposed urban renewal area with regard to public utilities and commercial facilities." The LDF complaint further asserts that Pulaski officials are in violation of the Department of Housing's Urban Renewal Manual in that: * boundaries of the proposed development “have been drawn to ex- clude a group of white occupied houses adjacent" to the Negro homes. * “these white occupied houses have been permitted to remain as nonconforming uses in an industrial zone" (more) S25 ASK HALT OF FEDERAL CASH TO 2: TENN, URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT * "there are competing demands for the 45 units of public housing presently being constructed under a previous public housing project" All told, the projected Westside Urban Renewal Project will effect total clearance by clearing away 52 structures and cisplacing 46 Negro residents, 24 owner-occupants and 22 tenants from a 17,64 acre site. Redevelopment of the land will be restricted to commercial and industrial uses. No residents from the designated area participated in planning of the new project. The two Negro members of the Citizen's Advisory Committee do not live in the area “and are not considered representative by its residents," Both Negro “advisors" own vacant land which would be available for Negro relocation if the loan and grant application is approved by the Department of Housing. LDF attorneys were assisted in preparation of the complaint by Yale Rabin, a city planner and a fellow in the American Institute of Planners. Mr, Rabin is also Principal Planner at the University of Pennsylvania Office of Institutional Studies and Planning, Mr, Rabin and LDF attorney Sheila Rush Jones journeyed to Pulaski and did an on-the-spot study of conditions. Their findings play a major part in the LDF complaint. That complaint was prepared by Mr. Greenberg, James Nabrit III, and Mrs, Jones of the LDF's New York headquarters, and Avon Williams of Nashville, Tennessee, “30=