Ask Halt of Federal Cash to Tennessee Urban Renewal Project
Press Release
December 22, 1965
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 4. Ask Halt of Federal Cash to Tennessee Urban Renewal Project, 1965. fb168269-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e43cf263-f2fb-425b-943d-734519e2dbf8/ask-halt-of-federal-cash-to-tennessee-urban-renewal-project. Accessed October 29, 2025.
Copied!
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel
egal efense lund Jack Greenberg
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Sages
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 etna . eres
FOR RELEASE
THURSDAY
December 22, 1966
ASK HALT OF FEDERAL CASH TO
TENN. URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT
Rights Attorneys Taking Hard
Look At Urban Renewal Patterns
WASHINGTON---The U, S, Department of Housing and Urban Development
today received a complaint from the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational
Fund, Inc. (LDF) calling for the halt of urban renewal funds for
Pulaski, Tennessee.
This complaint, the last remedial remedy prior to formal litigation,
sets the stage for a new thrust of litigation against local urban
renewal agencies across the nation which overlook rights of Nogro city
dwellers.
The LDF is also asking the Department of Housing for a prompt
hearing on this complaint, asserting that the proposed Westside Urban
Renewal Project deprives Negro complainants of equal protection of the
laws and due process under the 14th Amendment.
Jack Greenberg, LDF Director-Counsel, stated:
"Urban renewal has too often consisted of Negro removal. Until
now, apart from a case which the LDF won in Nashville in 1964, the
courts have not protected the rights of Negroes against this threat.
"We have just furnished our 250 cooperating attorneys with legal
materials spelling out means of enforcing the right of Negro citizens
against being uprooted and then compressed further into the ghetto.
"This proceeding is the first in a series."
The Pulaski Housing Authority, despite formal requests for con-
sideration by Negroes, has proposed a project that would remove Negroes
from a highly desirable area.
LDF attorneys point out that local Pulaski officials are in vio-
lation of federal statutes in that no dwellings “conforming to urban
renewal standards are available to persons to be displaced who are
ineligible for public housing."
Other violations of federal law cited in the LDF complaint stem
from the fact that:
* displaced persons ineligible for public housing are being offerec
vacant lots.
* these vacant lots are “located in areas clearly less desirable
than the proposed urban renewal area with regard to public
utilities and commercial facilities."
The LDF complaint further asserts that Pulaski officials are in
violation of the Department of Housing's Urban Renewal Manual in that:
* boundaries of the proposed development “have been drawn to ex-
clude a group of white occupied houses adjacent" to the Negro
homes.
* “these white occupied houses have been permitted to remain as
nonconforming uses in an industrial zone"
(more)
S25
ASK HALT OF FEDERAL CASH TO 2:
TENN, URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT
* "there are competing demands for the 45 units of public housing
presently being constructed under a previous public housing
project"
All told, the projected Westside Urban Renewal Project will
effect total clearance by clearing away 52 structures and cisplacing
46 Negro residents, 24 owner-occupants and 22 tenants from a 17,64
acre site.
Redevelopment of the land will be restricted to commercial and
industrial uses.
No residents from the designated area participated in planning of
the new project. The two Negro members of the Citizen's Advisory
Committee do not live in the area “and are not considered representative
by its residents,"
Both Negro “advisors" own vacant land which would be available
for Negro relocation if the loan and grant application is approved by
the Department of Housing.
LDF attorneys were assisted in preparation of the complaint by
Yale Rabin, a city planner and a fellow in the American Institute of
Planners. Mr, Rabin is also Principal Planner at the University of
Pennsylvania Office of Institutional Studies and Planning,
Mr, Rabin and LDF attorney Sheila Rush Jones journeyed to Pulaski
and did an on-the-spot study of conditions. Their findings play a
major part in the LDF complaint.
That complaint was prepared by Mr. Greenberg, James Nabrit III, and
Mrs, Jones of the LDF's New York headquarters, and Avon Williams of
Nashville, Tennessee,
“30=