Defendants Response to Motion to Join and Substitute Parties
Public Court Documents
August 24, 1973
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Defendants Response to Motion to Join and Substitute Parties, 1973. b986210e-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e4e53b3f-3b01-4fb9-8ed6-276ed29a2b98/defendants-response-to-motion-to-join-and-substitute-parties. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
O
RONALD BRADLEY, et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, et al,
Defendants,
and
DENISE MAGDOWSKI, et al, Civil Action
Defendants-Intervenors, No. 35257
and
i
DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS,
LOCAL 231, AMERICAN FEDERATION
OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO,
Defendant-Intervenor,
ALLEN PARK, et al,
Defendants-Intervenors,
and
KERRY GREEN, et al,
Defendants-Intervenors .
/
STATE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION TO JOIN AND SUBSTITUTE PARTIES
Now come defendants, Governor, Attorney General, State Board
of Education, Superintendent of Public Instruction and Treasurer
of the State of Michigan, referred to herein collectively as the
state defendants, by their attorneys, Frank J. Kelley, Attorney
General of the State of Michigan, and Eugene Krasicky, Assistant
Attorney General, and make their response to plaintiffs' motion
to join and substitute parties, respectfully representing to this
Honorable Court as follows:
* » *
V
1. The state defendants respectfully request that
this Court hold such motion in abeyance, as premature, pending
final disposition of the petition for certiorari which the state
defendants unequivocally intend to file with the United States
Supreme Court seeking its review of the majority decision of the
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rendered herein on June 12, 1973.
Bradley v Milliken, ___ F2d ___, Nos. 72-1809 - 72.1814, June 12,
1973, en banc, Slip Opinion, pp 1-81. The last day for filing
said petition for certiorari is September 10, 1973.
2. In the event this Court does not hold plaintiffs'
motion to join and substitute parties in abeyance, as premature,
the state defendants do not oppose such motion. However, in the
event this Court decides to grant the motion to join and substitute
parties, the state defendants respectfully submit that, in accordance
with the Sixth Circuit majority opinion, supra, pp 68-69, the joinder
of parties be effectuated prior to a hearing and decision upon
plaintiffs' motion to require submission of proposals to the
legislature. Otherwise, this Court will be perpetuating the
original error of entering orders affecting school districts that
have not yet been made parties to the case and afforded an
opportunity to be heard.
WHEREFORE, the state defendants respectfully request this
Honorable Court to hold in abeyance, as premature, plaintiffs'
motion to join and substitute parties.
Dated: August 24, 1973
Respectfully submitted,
FRANK J. KELLEY
Attorney General
Jv
Eugene Krasicky
Gerald F. Young
George L. McCargar
Attorneys for State Defendants
Business Address:
720 Law Building
525 West Ottawa Street
Lansing, Michigan 48913
- 2-