Defendants Response to Motion to Join and Substitute Parties
Public Court Documents
August 24, 1973

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Defendants Response to Motion to Join and Substitute Parties, 1973. b986210e-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e4e53b3f-3b01-4fb9-8ed6-276ed29a2b98/defendants-response-to-motion-to-join-and-substitute-parties. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION O RONALD BRADLEY, et al. Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, et al, Defendants, and DENISE MAGDOWSKI, et al, Civil Action Defendants-Intervenors, No. 35257 and i DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, LOCAL 231, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Intervenor, ALLEN PARK, et al, Defendants-Intervenors, and KERRY GREEN, et al, Defendants-Intervenors . / STATE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO JOIN AND SUBSTITUTE PARTIES Now come defendants, Governor, Attorney General, State Board of Education, Superintendent of Public Instruction and Treasurer of the State of Michigan, referred to herein collectively as the state defendants, by their attorneys, Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, and Eugene Krasicky, Assistant Attorney General, and make their response to plaintiffs' motion to join and substitute parties, respectfully representing to this Honorable Court as follows: * » * V 1. The state defendants respectfully request that this Court hold such motion in abeyance, as premature, pending final disposition of the petition for certiorari which the state defendants unequivocally intend to file with the United States Supreme Court seeking its review of the majority decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rendered herein on June 12, 1973. Bradley v Milliken, ___ F2d ___, Nos. 72-1809 - 72.1814, June 12, 1973, en banc, Slip Opinion, pp 1-81. The last day for filing said petition for certiorari is September 10, 1973. 2. In the event this Court does not hold plaintiffs' motion to join and substitute parties in abeyance, as premature, the state defendants do not oppose such motion. However, in the event this Court decides to grant the motion to join and substitute parties, the state defendants respectfully submit that, in accordance with the Sixth Circuit majority opinion, supra, pp 68-69, the joinder of parties be effectuated prior to a hearing and decision upon plaintiffs' motion to require submission of proposals to the legislature. Otherwise, this Court will be perpetuating the original error of entering orders affecting school districts that have not yet been made parties to the case and afforded an opportunity to be heard. WHEREFORE, the state defendants respectfully request this Honorable Court to hold in abeyance, as premature, plaintiffs' motion to join and substitute parties. Dated: August 24, 1973 Respectfully submitted, FRANK J. KELLEY Attorney General Jv Eugene Krasicky Gerald F. Young George L. McCargar Attorneys for State Defendants Business Address: 720 Law Building 525 West Ottawa Street Lansing, Michigan 48913 - 2-