Hardback 3 Index

Public Court Documents
November 8, 1991 - June 18, 1992

Hardback 3 Index preview

3 pages

Cite this item

  • Connecticut, Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Hardback 3 Index, 1991. d9a9b53f-a546-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e6b56532-6046-4a0f-a81f-ff3e12007e09/hardback-3-index. Accessed September 18, 2025.

    Copied!

    Date 
  

11/8/91 

1/15/92 

2/24/92 

3/13/92 

3/13/92 

3/16/92 

3/31/92 

3/31/92 

4/1/92 

4/1/92 

4/1/92 

4/1/92 

4/1/92 

4/16/92 

4/16/92 

MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O'NEILL 

Case # 2207-02 H/B #3 

Contents 
  

Defendants’ Reply Memorandum In Support of Their ) 
Motion for Summary Judgment .......... “ois vinivian nie ) 

Defendants’ Disclosure of Expert Witnesses ..... 

Memorandum of Decision on the Defendants’ Motion ) 
for Summary Judgment ..seveosvsves So ninie wma nhiners ) 

Letter from Philip Tegeler to Hon. Harry Hammer ) 
enclosing: ) 

) 
) PEE EE a] CFO sass cvs nensnussssoenesvinioee 

Letter from Richard Blumenthal (Attorney General) ) 
to Philip Tegeler enclosing: ) 

) 
) Order re deposition of expert witnesses ... 

Defendants’ Disclosure of Expert Witnesses ..... 

Notice of Filing of Defendants’ First Request ) 
FOI ProdUCLION ss sss ev sss eessnosncenssnssnennss ) 

Defendants’ First Request for Production ....... 

Notice of Disclosure of Expert Witnesses ....... 

Plaintiffs’ Third Identification of Expert 
Witnesses Pursuant to Practice Book §220 (D) ... 

Plaintiffs’ Order Governing Depositions of 
EXDOrt WIitNOSSOS vies vvvsvenvreccnssnsssonsnsenssnes 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order Governing Depositions 
Of EXpert Witnesses cece cecstsvsecenesonecuionns 

Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for 
Order Governing Depositions of Expert Witnesses, 
and in Opposition to Defendants’ Proposed Order 

a
”
 

N
a
”
 

N
a
e
”
 

Letter from Richard Blumenthal (Attorney General) 
to Philip Tegeler enclosing: 

Notices of Depositions and Subpoenae Duces 
Tecum for the Plaintiffs’ Expert Witnesses 

Subpoena Duces Tecum addressed to: 
Jamillls Henry Braddock, III, William Trent, 
EPS, & RODETL Cralll vue cesseessnennnsossinese 

V
a
”
 

N
s
”
 

N
t
”
 

N
a
i
?
 

w
i
 

w
t
 

“
u
s
?
 

10 

1l 

12 

13 

14 

 



MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL 

Case # 2207-02 H/B #3 

  

Date Contents No   
  

4/27/92 Letter from Philip Tegeler to John Whelan (Asst. 
Attorney General) re: Depositions of Expert 
RitNeSSeS oon vien certo nnrussnsnvesosssnnsssnsoe es 15 

4/30/92 Letter from Philip Tegeler to Clerk of Court 
(Superior Court) forwarding to Judge Hammer: 

Motion for Extension of Time to Respond 
to Defendants’ First Request for Production 

) 
) 
) 16 

) 
) 

5/14/92 Motion for Order of COMPliance ..cceeeeececeniss 17 

5/15/92 Defendants’ Amended Disclosure of Expert Witnesses 18 

5/27/92 Letter from Philip Tegeler to Clerk of Court 
(Superior Court) forwarding to Judge Hammer: 

Motion for Extension of Time to Respond 
to Defendants’ First Request for 
Production Q/Q 5/27/92 ceoeveessanensvinessns 

N
a
”
 

N
s
”
 

N
t
’
 

N
i
?
 

s
t
’
 

“
o
u
s
t
 

19 

6/2/92 Letter from Richard Blumenthal (Attorney General 
to Philip Tegeler confirming agreement re the 
hourly rates for the depositions of individuals 
whose identity has been disclosed to date ...... 20 

6/3/92 Order of Hon. Harry Hammer 5/29/92, J. Callaghan 
A/C 6/3/92, granting Motion for Extension of 
Time to Respond to Defendants’ First Request for 
FOr PrOQMCLION 4s s'ssnssnvsenssssevnsevonsoseenons 21 

6/4/92 Letter from Marianne E. Lado to Judge Hammer & 
Letter to Clerk of the Court (Superior Court) 
forwarding: 

Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s First 
Request FOr ProQuUCEiON. ccs vevvecevsosniens 

W
n
”
 

N
t
”
 

N
w
 

s
t
”
 

o
w
s
 

w
i
’
 

22 

6/4/92 Notice of Service of Plaintiffs’ Response to ) 
Defendants’ First Request for Production ...... }:. 23 

6/4/92 Stipulation Regarding Procedure for Taking of ) 
EXDErl DEPOSIT IONS vue essnmonosssaonsssvenesnsnens y. 24 

 



  

  

6/ /92 

6/10/92 

6/12/92 

6/15/92 

6/18/92 

MILO SHEFF, et al. v. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL 

Case # 2207-02 H/B #3 

Contents 
  

Letter from Richard Blumenthal (Attorney General) 
to Hon. Harry Hammer enclosing: 

N
a
”
 

a
”
 

a
 

a
 

un
 

u
t
 

Protective Orel & .ceosovavvoconessseneeni 
Stipulation Regarding Procedure for Taking 
of Expert Depositions ........ sus rivisnunives 

Order Governing Depositions of Expert Witnesses 

Order approving stipulation: Pleading 174.00 ) 
Order Governing Depositions of Expert Witnesses ) 

Plaintiffs’ Memorandum In Opposition to Defendants) 
Motion for Order Of COMPLIANCE weeeeeeseveceenes ) 

Notice of Deposition of: 

Robert Brewer, Douglas Rindone 
Patricia Downs, Thomas E. Steahr 
PAVIA ATTIOL creo vicionsn viansnecnsonsivionsicss son 

Findings and Orders of the Court before Hon. 
Harry Hammer, JUAGE ses vsvesensssrensvvsnsssonsos 

25 

26 

27 

29 

30

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.