Greenberg Statement on Review of Franks v. Brown
Press Release
March 24, 1975
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Greenberg Statement on Review of Franks v. Brown, 1975. 92240a14-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e7fa590a-37bd-422e-908b-b4223bfc0c6a/greenberg-statement-on-review-of-franks-v-brown. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
From: Norman Bloomfield
<-> NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund
10 Columbus Circle
4 New York, New York 10019
(212) 586-8397
NOTE TO EDITORS
NEW YORK, N.Y¥., March 24 - Following is a statement issued by Jack
Greenberg, director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational
Fund, in connection with today's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to
review Franks v. Bowman. The case deals with the loss of job seniority
resulting from discriminatory employment practices.
The Legal Defense Fund's Cert Petition, filed in the Supreme Court
on December 11, involves a Georgia-based trucking company which refused
until 1972 to hire black over-the-road drivers, rejecting several hun-
dred qualified black applicants prior to that date.
The Court of Appeals found discrimination in this instance, and
approved an order giving the black drivers the right to reapply and be
considered for hiring without discrimination. But it held that the
plaintiffs could not get seniority beyond the date of hiring.
The Legal Defense Fund contends that black workers should have
seniority dating back to the time when they would have been hired if
it had not been for the company 'S discrimination.
The Legal Defense Fund now has 45 days to file its brief in the U,S.
Supreme Court. The case probably will be argued in the fall.
The NAACP Legal Defense Fund is a completely separate organization
even though originally established by the NAACP in 1939. Its correct
designation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., frequently
shortened to Legal Defense Fund.
(more)
STATEMENT BY JACK GREENBERG: "This case may clarify the rights
of minorities and women when facing the 'last-hired, first-fired' situ-
ation during this period in which the economy is contracting. The
problem has long obstructed economic opportunity for blacks, and is
one reason for the chronically higher level of unemployment among
non-whites.”