Affidavit; Correspondence from Brock to Bradford Reynolds; List of North Carolina Constitutional Amendments; Correspondences from Brock to Bradford Reynolds; Memorandum from Sanders to Wallace; Reports of the Legislative Research Commission to the General Assembly of North Carolina, 1967
Public Court Documents
January 1, 1967 - October 6, 1981

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Affidavit; Correspondence from Brock to Bradford Reynolds; List of North Carolina Constitutional Amendments; Correspondences from Brock to Bradford Reynolds; Memorandum from Sanders to Wallace; Reports of the Legislative Research Commission to the General Assembly of North Carolina, 1967, 1967. e1e3d3b7-d892-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/eb224a23-b598-412e-9fbb-923adbec36a9/affidavit-correspondence-from-brock-to-bradford-reynolds-list-of-north-carolina-constitutional-amendments-correspondences-from-brock-to-bradford-reynolds-memorandum-from-sanders-to-wallace-reports-of-the-legislative-research-commission-to-t. Accessed July 13, 2025.
Copied!
I .'.' ; - ', ....' IIN rllltj UNITED STA'r'ES DISTRICT COURTron-iu{ Eeiirnn DrsTRrcr oF NoRTrr cARoLTNA ".-t ,' 'i3!rl I RALEIGII DIVTSION | ''" ''--":)ll !-;:'-""1t' '' :::lK I CIVIL ACTION ,. ;, et .lr. , *o' Bl-Bo3-crv-s [ ' t' +l llplaintilf f s, ) v. I i AFFTDAVTT RUF'US EDMISTEN, ". [, ]lr Def enda[rts. ) I Alex K. Brock, f,.i.,g duly s\{orn, hereby deposes and Isays, I 1. l, afex [<. Brockr drn Secretary-Director of the state Boarcl of Er..Jcions of North carorina, the of f ices of Iwhlch are located ale suite B0r, Raleigh Brrildinq, 5 hlest |---J.- Hargett Street, nalpigh, North Carolina 2760L; I2- r have sprved in that capacity continuously since August 5, 1965, unal was, therefore, serving in that capacity j-n Lg67 when the c.f,.r.r Assembry of North carolj-na ratified chapter 640, sessiof, r,.*= ot Lg67, whj-ch contained proposals Ifor two amendments lto the constitution of North carolina; I3. Those twp eronosals were approved by vote of the Ipeople in November pf 1958 and became Article rr, &4(3) (presentty Arricle Ir, S3 (3) ) and Arri.cle It, S6 (3) lpr.sently IArticle II 55(3) ) "F the Constitution of l.torth Carolina; 4. Article Ir, 53(3) provides, inter aIia, that the IGeneral Assembly ofl North Carolina is prohibited from dividing counties in formingl an. state senate erectoril clistricts; Article rr, s5(3) nfotia"=, iltgr glig, that the General Assembly is prohibited from frrrur.,n ;t;; formins state Represenrarive electoral dlstri.a= | I 5. As best I reca11, t did not deem these amend.ments to lev,the State Constitutfon to be subject to the submission requirements Iof s5 of the votinslnisnts Act of 1965, dt the time of their adoptlon, and., ther$tore, r did not submit the amendments to the IAttorney General ofl the Unlted States for approval or seek their Iapproval by the unifed States District Court for the District of Columbia, I I I I I I I I I r*' owever, now advised the Attorney General tional arnendments, by v,ray of correspondence ember 22, 23, 24 and 28, 19Bt; all of my corresponclence to the Attorney n part the 1968 amendments is attached ertinent attachments to the correspondence, session 1aws, the corresponrlence and attach- ated herein by reference: ritted al1 information to the Attorney General f any irnportance or siqnif,icance to a determina- ether the amendments satisfy the requj-rements Rights Act of 1965 and have requested that the : as expedltiously as possible; so submitted to the Attorney General, for his . Chapter 800, Chapter B2I, and Chapter 87, , these constituting, respectively, North ment plans for the state House and Senate, and state Congressi aI electoral districts: 10. I have bmitted all other information deemed by rne he apportionment p1ans, includinq all tion requested by the Attorney General. to be pertinent to supplernental info 6. I have, of the 1968 Constit on the dates of .qep 7. A copy o General, regarding hereto, along with excluding copies of ments being incorpo B. I have s which I deern to be tion by him as to w of 55 of the Voting determination be ma 9. I have a approval, copj-es of Session Laws of 198 Carolina's apporti Sworn to this the and subsc ibed 01*H A*",/- afex S ecretary-Di rector North Carolina State Board of Elections AFFIANT before me October,19BI. u ?Lz-,J NOTARY Commission Expi 6ffit' a of UBLIC I'1y ALEX X. BFIOCK EXECUTIVE SECRETARY - OIRECTOR At tention: In re: Gentlemen: at each by each mi tted ATL It()Alrt) ()l.. t.:Lt.:(:t'I()Ns SutrE 80l RALETcH BurLDrN6 5 WE6T HARGETT STREET RALETGH. NoRrH Cenoltxe 27601 Sep tember 22, 1981 BROCK AFTTDAVIT ATTACIII(E}IT T REGISTERED - RETIIRN RECEIPT REQUESTED TELEPHOI.IE (919| t29-' l'r3 Mr. t{i1Iiam Bradford Rey Asslstant Attorney Gener Civil Rights Dlvlslon United States Department l{ashington, D. C. 20530 llteracy test or other d reglster to vote. It is lds f Justlce se measures were submitted after enact- General Assembly, they are now being sub- peop 1e. ice as a precondltion to any indivldual to n recognltion of the provlsions contained Mr. Gerald l.I Jones Sec tion Carollna Chief, Voti State of Nor Pursuant to provisi of sectlon 5, Voting Rlghts Act of 1965 d and renewed in 1970, we submit the dments adopted (or defeated) by the 5 November 1968; 3 November 1970; 7 Nov- Public Law 89-110, as attached Consti tutional voters of North Carolina ember 7972; 5 November 1 4 November 1980. Wtrile ment by the North Caroli 4; 23 March 1976; 8 November 1977 and mitted after a vote by You will note the f 1 text of each numbered amendment submltted ed as is the total YES and NO vote received each ballot ls attached hereto with the sub- election is p issue. A copy o result table. It is critical to a re you that even though Amendment {17 sub- mitted for vote in the North Carolina has not, ember 3, 1970 General Election was defeated, s not and will not utilize any type of in the Voting Rishts Act f 1965 applylng to forty (40) counties in North Carollna as well a rulings by the Federal'Courts that no lit- eracy test shall be appli in this State. r. t ; t- f U Mr. lftn. Bradford Reynol We awalt your conf Attachments: Schedule (7) Ballor The undersigned cer ment together with attac Assistant U. S. Attorney ment, Washlngton, D. C. wlth Return Recelpt Requ 1981. -2- tion that no obJectlon ls Very truly yours, September 22, 1981 lnterposed. ATTEST: t,40 c*/k- {-<L Notary Pub1ic Ily comrnlssion explres eu,*K Er^l Executive Secretary - Dlrector CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE lfles that he has served the foregolng state- ment on.the Honorable William Bradford Reynolds, General, Clvll Rlghts Dlvlsion, Justlce Dlpart- depositing same ln the U. S. MaiI Registlred ted, postage prepaid thls 22nd day of September Executive Secretary-p6r""at N. C. State Board of Elections ber 31, 1984. ISSIJE # Constitutlona.l Anendrnent estebJJ.shirrg pnocedure for ffudng cmpensation of members a^rd offlcers of the Goneral Assedb\r, ard derrying beneflt of aqp lacrease il conpernation to nenbors of Session whlch enacts i.t. Axnondtrg the Constitution of North Carollna to require the General Asse.h\y to reduce the State Adnlnl,stratlve Departrnents to 25 ard to authorlze the Governor to reorgani.ze the Adni.nistratlve Departnents subJect to legislative NOBTH CAROIJI{A COI,ISTIfl TIO}{AL AUE[.ID][EII?S DESCRIPTION PROPOSED BY - NOVB,IBEB (. 1968 Constltutional Anerdnent Iegislature Ieglslature VCIIE rEs NO RESI'LT 573,289 465122.5 Adopted 5&,1633 3n )95 AdoPted TTPE #t #z constitutional Anendnent conti.nuing constltutional present systen of reprosentati.on Anerdrnent ln the C,eneral Assernb\r. it #z NOVB{BEB 3. 1970 Revislng ard anerdlng the ConstLtutlon Constltutlonal of North Caro];lna Anerdnent Constltutlonal Anerdrnent Ieglslature Iagtslature 393,759 400,892 25Lr732 Adopted 2r,81795 Adopted #3 ilt+ t5 Ansrd the Constltutlon of North CeroUna peroJ.ttlng ttrree-flfths of the mubers of the General Asseub\y to couveue extra sessjons of the General Assenb\r. Bsvising those portlons of the pnesent or proposed State Constitutton concertdng State ard local finances. Anending the Constltutlon of North Carollna to authorlze the C,eneral Aseeub\y to fix personal exenptions for i.ncoe toc prrposes. Constltutlona]. Anerdnent Constltuttonal Anendnent Constltutlonal Arerdnent Ioglslature LeglsJature 332,98L 285r5gl Adopted 323,13L 281,087 Adopted rrlcr- r Iaglslature 336,66o 282r6n Adopted ISSIJE # TTPE #6 Anending the Constltution of North Carollna to pnovlde that after June 30, I97I, the escheats sha]-l be used to aid North CaroHna residents enrolled tn ary prrb}lc lnstttutlon of hlgher educatlon in thig State. #? Anendilg the Constitutlon of North Carolina by abolishi.ng the literacy reErlrement for voting. NORTH CAROLIM CCI{STfTUTfON[L AUEI,TDMEIfIS LESCRTPTION Constltuti,onal Anerdnent ConstLtutlonal Anerdnent Iaglslatrrre 2?g rt32 355r34? Defeated ?62r65L l+25 '7@ Adopted 811r/*t*O 3c\rt*99 Adopted VOTE -2 NO RESTILT 48rl+5l PROPOSED BII Iegtslature Iaglslatnre I.egts)atrrne ES 362rog7 NOVB{BER 7. 1a72 #t Anendlng the Constltutlon of North Caro}Lna reducing the voting age to 18 years and pnovidlng that on\y persons 2l years of age or older shall 66 stigible for elective office. #Z .Anerding the Constituil.on of North Carol-lna to requl.re the General Assemb\y to pnescribe ng)cillluln age 'l { ni ts for senrlce ag a Corutltutlonal .Anerdnent Constltutlonal Amerdnent #3 #4 Anerdlng the Constltuion of North Carollna authorlzing the Creneral Asseub\y to pescribe pnocedures for the cerutung ard renonal of Jwtlces and Judges of the C,eneral Court of rlustlce. Anerding the ConstLtutlon of Nozth Carolina to conserrre and protect North Carolinats natural resources. Anending the Constltutlon of North CarolLna 'l i ni filg i.ncorlrcratj.on of cltles and torrns. Constitutlonal Anerd:nent Constltutlonal Amerdment Constltutlonal Anerdnent Iaglslatrrre Iegisla,ture 807,960 272r1+7O Adoptad 976,58L 1J*6 1995 Adopted #5 Leglslature 694,g2L 3?4'].84 Adopted ISSUE # TTPE NOBTH CAROIJM COI,ISTITUTIONAL AI,{ENDUEI\IIE DESCBIPTION - PBOPOSED BII - NOIIEI,IBER <. 1O7I Iagtslature IegLelature -3 VqIE ]ES NO NESIITT 4?l+,Lgg 49 rl+52 Adopted 317 1285 376'269 Defeated #t constltutionar Anerdnent clranglng the constltutlonal title of the Constltutlonal offlce Anerdnent of tSollcltorr to rDlstrict Attorney. r #2 constltuttonsr Ansndrnent to create constltutlonal Jobs and enploJrn€nt opportunities Anendnent and to pnotect the envlronment by authorlzing the issuance of nevenue bond^: to finance lrdustrial ard pollutlon control facilltles anong others for industry ard the rati- fication, validatlon, conflrmation ard appnova1 of Chapter 633 of the 1971 Session Iars as anended, by Chapter 476 of tfu 19?3 Session Iaws o-f ttre' Genoral Asse-h\y wtrich inplenents the foregoing 8rd of the pnoceedlngg talcen prsrrant thereto by ary cowrty of the State in the creation of a irdustrta]. fact't{tles flnanchg authority rnd a'l'l proceedings by an author{.ty so created in authorizlng the financlng of lrdrrstrial ard pollution control facll:Lties. i-'\.*\. -, NoRTH CAnoLIM CONSTIIUTIoML AI{ENIMAIIS ISSIJE # TTPE - DESCRIPTION MAnCH 2?. Ia75 #f Constltutlona]. Amerdnent to perrtt Constltutlonal the C,eneral Asse-hfy to enact Anerdnent general laws to authorlze the Stat€, corntles, cltles or tonns, ard other Steto ard local gov€r[- nental entlties to Lssue revenue bords to flnance or reflnance fon ary such governuontal entlty or aqf nonprofit prlnate corporatlon, regardless of argr church or reli.glous relationship, the cost of acquirlng, constnrcting Brd flnanclng health satt fgs{I{ty poJects, such bonds to be payable lbon the revemes, grosrs or net, of aqp such pnoJects aad ary other health gatt fssl'l{tlss of ary such gwernnentel entiry or nonpnotlt private corporatlon pledged therefor. #Z Constltutlonal Anerdnent to perntt the. Constltutlonal Iaglsl^ature Legls)ature PBOPOSED BT - -4 VqTE IES NO NESULT 3&rog3 3ILr3@ Adopted 3n '$3 3A+r938 Adopted General Assenb\y to enact general lawE to authorize corrnti-es to creato Amendrent to flrance, but not to refirence, the cost of capltal pnoJects consistLng of l-ndtrsttC€,1, rnanrfacturirlg ald pollutlon control f6g{'l{fiss for lndustry ard pollution contlpJ- fEgirrties for Snrbllcuti.}ltles, ard to refirrd such bonds, such bonds to be secured by and payeble on\y from nevenues or pnoperty derlved fron pnlvate parties and ln no event to be secured by or pagrable fron ary prbJ-ic none!rc rdratsoever. i'**- r -5 ISSI'E # TIPE - - #f Constltutlonal Amerdnent extendlng.to a narrled nan (as a marrled wo'man now has) the right to recelve the homestead exempti.on is. avallable to the sunriving spouee of the owner of a homestead, lf the oyrner dies leaulng no ntnor chlldren and the sunriving Epouse does not own & separate hmestead. #Z Constltutlonal Anerdnent aJ*lorlng every person the rlght to insure hls or her }lfe for the beneflt of his or her spouse or children or both, free fron a'l t claims of the repnesentatives or creditors of the insured or his or her estate. NoRTH CAROLTI{A CONSTIIT TIoML Al,tENpl(ENIs DESCRIPTION PBOPGED BT - - NOVE.{BER 8. Iq77 Constitutlonal Amendment Iegls)ature Constltutlonsl Ansrdrcnt Iaglslature Ieglslature VOTE IBS 5t7 '366 fis,52l, 3Vl,754 NO NESULT 59'?U Adopted 5? '835 ldopted 278r0l3 Adopted#3 constltutlonal Anerdment enporvering constltuttonal the quali.fled voters of the State lmendnent to elect the Governor ard Lteutenant Goverzror to a second successlve terr of the Eare office. . Srj-u :' L---..--. ; NORTH CAROLINA CONSTINNIONAL AI.{ENDMEMS PROPOSED EIT Iagislature VqIE -6 NO RESULT 1801624 Adopted rssrrE # gPE DESCRTPTION #4 Constltutlonal Anerdnent to pemit Constitutlonal ururlclpalitles orning or operating Anerdnent electric generatlon, transmission or distrlbutlon facil{tles and Joint agencies conposed of such murdcl- palities to cwn, operate ard naintaln general and transmisslon fss{'li flse with arsr pereon, firm, assoclatlon or corporetion, p$I:Lc or private, , engaged in the generatlonr trans- mission or distribution of electrlc power and enerry for resale (each, respectlve\r, ra co-orner) ritfrU thls State of angr state contiguous to this State, ard to issue electric revenue bords to finance the cost of the ornership share of such muricl- palitles or Jolnt agencies, such bords to be secured by and pa;rable on\r fron the electric revernres of such Brrlcl- palitles or Jolnt agencies and pnovlding that no money or pnoperty of such mrnicl- paJ-lties or Joint agencies shal-l be credj.ted or applied to the account of arry such co-ol{ner. t:Es 3t+gry)5 #5 Constitutlonal Anerdnent requiring that the total exponditures of the State for the fiscal perlod correr"ed by the State budget shall not occeed the total of revenues raised during that flscal period and ary surplus rcnal*- ing ln the State Treasu4r at the beglnning of the pertd, and requirlng the Governor to effect the necessarlr econonles in Stat€ ecpenditures wherp ever he determines that a deflclt Ls threatened. Constitutional Anendnent Ieglsl^Btrrre t*3 1453 LOI+'935 MoPted frK"Er -', @ vorE ISIiIIE # TI?E DESCRIPTIOI PROFGED BI Tll NO REiI,IJ EU4trEE-&rJSp #1 CoDltJ,tuti@a1 lDstdDent requkfDg CdlgtLtutl,otl8J. LgilLitur. @1634 35217\ Adopt d JurtJ.coe qrd Judgcg of tho suFlur llodrlt Court, Court o! AppeaLs, SuFtr.or Court ad DiEtrtct oourt to be duJJr autborLa6d to FctLca Lsr Flor to slrctLon or eppotrtront. SubuLtted by the State Board of ELectlons of North Carol5.na thls 22rd day of Septeuber 1981. ClzxM Facecutive Secretartrr-Dlrector It{ ALEX K, BROCX EXECUTIVE SECRETARY - OIRECTOR In re: Gentlemen: Under submi tted submi tted ments were Mr. lftn Bradford Reyno AssisTant Attorney Ge Civil Rlghts Dlvision United States Departm Washington, D. C. 2O5 Attention: Mr. Geral Chief, Vo State of date of 22 a schedule to voters a voted on. At direction of eral for Legal Affatr acts authorizing the will be transmitted u We are prompted conversation with Mr. ments other than the When he recelved our that we lnclude in ou the facts to Asslstan The amendment #2 much as the wrlter intno change ln electl ATI' It( ),\ttl) ( )I.' t.:1,t.:(.-l'I():{s SUrTE' 80l RALEtcx BurLorNo 5 WEE' HARGETT STREET RALEToH. NoFTH Cenourxe 27(,,01 September 23, 1981 BROCK ATFIDAVIT ATTACHMENT II REGISTERED - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Wallace, Deputy Attorney Gen- coples of the legislatlve amendments. These Documents a matter of a few days. TELEPHOI{E (919t E29-7 r73 ds ra1 nt of Justice lr. Jones ing Sectlon rth Carolina September 1981 (Registered No. 28254) rhis office f Constitutlonal Amendments along wlth ballots each statewlde election ln whlch subJect amend- ounsel, Mr. James M. , rde are accumulatlng te on the submitted er separate cover in point out that Mr. Wallace, during a telephone Reynol.ds, was totally unaware that there were amend- submltted at an election held on 5 November 1968. chedule of amendment elections Mr. Wallace requested letter that he.ln no way attempted to mlsrepresent Attorney General Reynolds. voted on ln 1968 was not previously submitted inas- rpreted the effect of the amendment to constltute or votlng procedure. t Mr. l{rn Bradford Re lds Flnally, due to clate your consldera tlotary Publtc My Cornmlssion explre -2- ndlng actlon ln on ln expedltlng Very truly September 23r 1981 Federal Court we wl1l greatly appre- these matters yours, Qu<8A Executive Secretary N. C. State Board of - Director Elections October 31, 1984. ALEX K. BROCK EXECUTIVE SECRETARY - OI RECTO R Mr. l,Im Bradford R Assistant Attorney CivtI Rlghts Divis United States Depa Washington, D. C. At tentlon: In re: Mr. Ge Chief, State Cons t,i Gentl emen: We transmit h electlons to be he ments proposed by of the quallfied v supplement the inf ember 1981 (Regist tnformation referr istered No. 28268) The writer ha acts proposing Con electlon or voting Chapter 640 S 1200 Sesslon Laws of 1977i Chapter 363 S The submisslo amendments not p ATL IT( )AIr l) ()t.' !.:LD(..1.I()NS SUITE 80I RALEIoH BUILDINo 5 WE3T HARGE'T STREET RALEToH. NoRrH Cenolrxe 2ZAOI September 24, 1981 BROCK AFFIDAVIT ATTACIIIIENT TIT REGISTERED . RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED T EL E PHO,.I E (0lot t29-? tr3 no lds Genera I on tment of Justice 0530 a1d tI. Vo ting Jones Section Caro I ina Amendments, Supplemental f North tional rewith coples of legislative acts authorizing d on whether or not the ConstitutionaL Amend- he submltted acts shall be approved by a vote ters ln North Carolina. These submisslons rmation transmitted by our letter dated 22 Sept- red No. 28254) and constitute the addttlonal to in our letter dated 23 September 1981 (Reg- undertaken to burden you only wlth Ieglslative titutional Amendments that deal generally with practlces. They are: ssion Laws of 1967i Chapters 7258, 1004, ws of 1969; Chapters 201, 535, 857 Session Chapter 394 Session Laws of 1973; and sslon Laws of L977. s transmltted herewith constitute all acts and ously submitted deallng with areas covered Mr. l{m Bradford Rey lds -2- under the Votln ts Act of 1965. We wl11 apprec Attachments: (9) The underslgne statement together Jones, Chief, Votl ington, D. C. by de wlth Return Recelpt September 1981. ATTEST: 1,, .i tr. J Notary Publlc My Conunlsslon expire October 31,1984. September 24,1981 te your expeditlous handltng of thls matter. Very truly yours, C/r"*,d 8r*.L Executlve Secretary - Dlrector CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE certifles that he has served the foregoing th attachments on the Honorable Gerald lI. Section, U. S. Department of Justlce, Wash- siting same ln the U. S. MalI registered equested, postage prepaid this 24th day of Cz./K Brra J r" ALEX K. BROCK EXECUTIVE SECRETARY - DIRECTOR Attention: In re: Gentlemen: Mr. IE Bradford Reynold Assistant Attorney Gene Civtl Rights Divlsion United States Departmen l.lashington, D. C. 20530 Mr. Gerald Chief, Voti State Cons ti of No tu ti Transmitted herewi /11 and ll2 relative to (Registered No . 28254); ember 1981 (Reglstered Exhibit ll1 represe Exhibit {12 is a hisrory Constitution and should s tanding. Both of these do the Institute of Gover Institute of Government Carollna ln research a Cons ti tu tion. Trusting these fur Attachments: (2) BROCK AFTIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT IV TII I t( ),\ t< t ) ( )If l.:I.t.:( -l.I( ,NS SUITE. 80I RALEIGH. BUILDING 5 WE6T HARGETT STREET RALETGH. NonrH CenolrNt 276c l September 28r 1981 REGISTERED . RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED aI of Justlce Jones Sectlon th Carolina 1 Amendments, Supplemental you will find additional supplemental exhlbits r prevlous transmittals dated 22 September 1981 23 September 1981 (Regtstered 28268); and 24 Sept- 28277) . ts the TELEPHONE (9t9' 7!3-rr7! f the rovide orlgln of the amendment voted on ln 1968. evolution of the North Carollna State an adequate background for clearer under- nts were prepared by John Sanders, Dlrector of nt of the University of North Carollna. The eguLarly assists the General Assembly of North development of leglslation dealing with the er documents will assist ln your review we are, Very truly yours, eu// 8 Executlve Secretary - Director I j I., r'a .;t { c t,_. - . t,. The underslgned ment together with at Voting Sectlon, Civll Washington, D. C. by Return Recelpt Reguest 1981. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE rtlfies that he has served the foregolng state- chments on the Honorable Gerald W. Jones, Chlef, lghts Divlslon, U. S. Department of Justice, lting same ln the U. S. Mall Reglstered wlth , postage prepald thls 28th day of September, ATTEST: t(.<cL( Notary Publlc My conrnlsslon explrel 0a, n 8r*r/* Executlve Secretary-Director N. C. State Board of Elections tober 31, L984. r,,t. t I I '{' + ,.. TO: FROM: OATEr INSTITUT T}iE UNIVERSITY OF Memorandutn. Jlrn Wallace John Sandera 9l23l8L SUBJECT: taaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaa Thle ls the proposed by the in 1968. As I The amendment not coneldered more than a Job of neatenlng-up the Constltutlon General AeeeubJ.y Court ln Drum. nake lt reflect the reallty followlng the e actlon ln compllance wlth the order of the ORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 27514 OF GOVERNMENT ExurErT -4 / epeclflc orlgln of the constltutlonal amendment L967 GeneraL Aseenbly and ratlfled by the voters 1, I worked wlth Herbert Hyde on thls subJect. t .7 aai r. r(: 3ii #.-; *i; !i ai ( Y n H. P. Taylor, Jr. Robert B. Morgan, Member Senator Senator Senator Senator Senator ISTATIVE RESEARCH COMMISSION 1965 196? Co-Chairmen: eaker of the House Pro Tempore Representatives, 1965-66 the Sinate, 1965-66esident of of Mem Anooi n Belk ert L. Hyde M. Mi11s, Seay, White es entative es entative esentative esentative es entative th Pres id Jr. Jr. Philip Claude Hugh S. Dwight Wayland he Soeak P. Godwin M. Hamrick Johnson, Jr. W. Quinn J. Sermons IN r He Fr Th Th ed Rep Rep R Rep Rep eta the C Ls st_on Itlrs. Fred M. Benton I V a Report No. I REPOBO ON ASSEI'IBLI OF NOffE C,AR0LIIIA North Carollna slatlve Reaearch Coomlaslon Rd.elgh L96T $; I I , I? :' MEIroRAl,lDtl'{ TO: FRO}I: DATE: STEJECT: Jamee l{allace John Sanderp September 24-\ The Subdlvlel Dlstrlcte for North Carol Ttre purpoae of thl provlelons of the Conet establlstment of dlstr Houee of Repreeentatlv whether and when a couu L979-193s Fron 1976 through the Senate ahould cone of Commone should conel elected one from each of electlon dletrlct for apportloned to each c fornlng senate dlstrlcta aleo the dlatrlct for for the borough nenbera) of countl.ee ln fornlng s 98r of the Et.atst 7 *2 Countlee ln Drawtng Senate and Repreeentative Electlon of lGrnbers of the General Aesenbly of memorandum le to trace the evolutlon of the to the the Senate and the queatlon of euch a dletrlct. utlon of North Carollna wlth respect for the electlon of the menbere of wlth partlcular to the attentton of nay be dlvlded ln the formatlon of 35, the Constltutlon of North Carollna provlded that of one member elected fron each county and the Houee of two membere elected from each county plue nenbere alx (later eeven) boroughs. The county wae the bers of the Senate and wlth only one Senator Ir no queetlon of the subdlvlslon of countlee ln arose. Conetltutlon of L776, Sec. 2. The county wag election of uembere of the Houee of Cor"mona (except and the Constltutlon dld not authorlze the dlvislon h dletrtcte. C,onetl.tutlon of L776, Sec. 3. I t : * I v 1836-1858 Ttre State Constltu then nade repreeentatl Senators " to be elect,ed Asaenbly " ln proportlon State . . ., ?rovided, Senatorlal dLetrlct." 1835 anendmente, the countlee ae unlte, with was compoeed of 120 nen thecountleg...." member, lrreepecttve of fulflllnent of that gua countlee accordtng to a 1835, Art. I, Sec. l, P requlring s lngle-c ounty granted to the General electlon dlstrlcte. Sl Anendnente of 1835, the dlatrlcts could have 1868-r968 The Conetltutlon Anendmente of I835 that nembere of the llouee of 1on of wa8 extenelvely amended ln 1835. Ttre Senate wag property (neaeured lndlrectly by atate taxee) wlth dlstrlcts" decennlally establlehed by the General to the publlc taxee paid lnto the Treasury of the at no county ehall be dlvlded ln the foruatlon of a ndmente'of 1835, Art. I, Sec. l, Par. l. Under the ee of Commone wae Eade rnalnly representaElve of the eome leavenlng for populatlon. The Houee of Conmone r8r ".blennlalLy choeen by ballot, to be elected by ery county was guaranteed the rlght to elect one lts populatlon, and the members rernatnlng after the antee were apportLoned anong the nore populoue fornula preecrlbed by the Conetltutlon. Anendnente of t. 2. Ttrle provlslon was unlformly treated ae lotrlcta for Commona membere, and no power tras eenbly to dlvlde or comblne counttes ln formlng blacke were not pernltted to vote under the prohlbltlon agaLnet dlvtdlng countlee ln fornlng no racial purpose or effect. pted ln 1868 retalned the baelc conceptlon of the fron digtrlctg and that elected from countles. Senatore ehould be elected Representatl.vee ehould be * ^ 0 The Conetltutlon dletrlcte ehould be ea contaln "8s nearly aB and IndLans not taxed . of a Senate DlstrLct, nore Senators." Ihle alngle county contalned or more Senatore would electlon dletricte. In nore than one Senator to act of 1963. Ar thar t dlstrlct compoeed of l& to the dletrlct compoeed subseguent tlne to dlvl as the Conetltutlon wouL The House of Repr Sece. 6 and 7, continued House of Comnona under fact that the whole po calculatlng the apportLo aeat per county had been provlded " that the llouse and twenty Repreaentatl countLes reapectlvely . rraa no provlslon for the 1868, Art. II, Sec. 5, preacrlbed that the Senate lahed on the baele of populatlon so that each ehould be, an equal number of lnhabltanta, excludlng allena t i and no county ehall be dlvlded ln the fornatlon ess euch county ehall be equltably entltled to two or vlelon comtenplated that only Ln the event that a flclent lnhabltantB to cauae it to be allocated two t county be eubJect to dlvislon lnto two or more act, the GeneraL Aseenbly never saw flt to allocate any elngJ.e-county dletrlct until the apportionment , three Senate aeata were apporttoned to the enburg County and two aenate eeata hrere apportLoned of Foreyth County. No effort was made then or at any thoee countlee lnto two or three electlon dlstricte have alloned. tatlves under the Conetltutlon of 1868, Art. II, to be apportloned ln the eame mrnner as had been the Conetltutlonal Anendnente of 1835, save for the atlon and not the federal population was ueed ln t, of eeate left over after the guarantee of one eatlefled. Ttre Constttutlon, lrt. II, Sec. 6, of Repreeentatlves ehall be composed of one hundred s, blennlally chosen by balIot, to be elected by the . ." the county rra6 the electlon dletrlct. Ttrere conblnatlon of countLee or the dlvlalon into two or \, ,,\ [lore electlon dletrlcte of the Houee of Repres for the dlvlslon of exlst. The eynpathy of t 1868, for votlng by b black males 21 yeara of that ConventLon underet ln the formatLon of J.eg dteadvantaglng black vo Drum v. Seawell As a reeult of an Court for the lflddle Dl declared the exlstlng a Repreeentatlves to be I ordered both houseg to found no fault wlth the apportlonnent of the St among dlstrlcte. It f of the llouee of Repre every county could be remalning twenty membe proportlon to populat the provlelong of the S afforded at Least one atlves. In of countlee 4 that were apportloned two or Eore menbere the abeence of a conetltutlonal provlalon underetood that auch authorlty dld nottlee, lt wae Conventlon of 1868, whlch franed the Conetltutl.on of ks waa lndlsputable; lt opened the franchiee to all age. Ttrerefore lE 18 lmprobable that the members of the ltnltatlone they lnpoeed on dlvldlng countles elatlve dlstrlcte to have had the purpose or effect of er8. tlon (Drun v. Seawell) brought ln the Unlted DletrLct trlct of North Carolina 1n 1965, a three-Judge court rtlonment of the North CarolLna Senate and Houee of vl.olatlon of the Unlted States Constltutlon and e reapportloned on the baele of populatton. Ttre court exlstlng state constltutlonal provlslon governlng the t,e Senate, slnce lt requlred equall.ty of populatlon nd that the exletlng provlslon governtng apportlorunent tatlves waa Lnvalld becauee there rras no way ln whlch aranteed one of the 120 members of the Eouee and the eEl1l be eo apportLoned that equal representatlon ln could achleved. Accordlngly, the court held "that ate Constltutlon requlrlng that each county be presenEetlve regardleee of lts populatlon and the \, o lmplenentlng statute (N. Protectlon provlaione of VOld." hrreuant to the ma January of 1966 and rea Repreaentatlvea. Ttre pl three-Judge federal cour 1970. Those plane dld Repreeentatlve dletrlcte dld the court t,ake excep 5 .G.S. L20-2) to be ln vlolatlon of the Equal the Fourteenth Amendment and therefore nul1 and te of the federal court, the General Aseenbly net rtloned the State Senate and House of lt then adopted were aubeequentLy approved by the and controlled the electtons of L966, I968, and t dlvide countlee ln the foruatlon of Senate or No protee rnade of that fact at the tlme, nor lon to that fact on lts own account. L967 the read Constltutlonal Anendnent f 1958 The Leglslatlve Re arch Commlaelon flled wlth the General Assenbly of h several aepecte of the organlzatlon and servlcee ofa report deallng wl General Aaeenbly of as follows: rth Carol-lna. One recommendatlon of that report We recommend the ndnent of the State Conetltutlon ln order to conform the provlslons of t t Constitutlon pertal.nlng to the apportlonment of the State Leglela e to the current practlcea ln that reepect. That brlef sectlon f the report of the Leglslatlve Research Connieslon the 1966 extra eesslon of the General Assenbly in of the court Ln Drum v. Seawelt, 'made obeelete a noted that the action of of the North Carollna Constltutlon wlth reepect to B€o l{hlLe the Conetltutional provlelone governing are not ln confllct wlth the Federal Conetltutlon, they are ln need of nl.no clarlfylng revlston." A b111 to carry out the q v recommendatlon of the Leg General Aeeembly of 1967' membere of each houae, ra 1968, and took effect u The adoptlon of thle ane membere of the Senate and memberg rdere then elected of Senate dletrlcts and t were rewrltten ln the lnt waa the declaratlon that SenateDistrlct. .. ." Sec. 4 (3). Ttrle Provlsl Congtltution ae lt had r county to whlch more than electoral dletrLcts. The Aeaenbly, however, and th abeolute prohlbltton agal Senate dlstrlcta constit voters of the State no c or effect. There havlng than county-wlde elect baele for epeculatlon t any other Partlcular I that they dld not enJoY from dletrlctg that were latlve Reeearch Connlealon t aa subnltted to the pproved by the requlalte three-flfthe of all the fled by the votere of the State ln November of the certiflcatlon of the amendment late ln 1968. nt made no change ln the actual aPPortlonnent of use of Representatlves or ln dlstrLcts frorn whlch Ttre provielons wlth respect to the establlstment apporttonnent of Senatore among thoae dletrl'ets et of clarity. Ttre only posslbly new provlslon No county shall be dtvlded ln the fomatlon of a Conetltutlon of 1868 as anended ln 1868, Art. II, appeare to reverae tn part that Provlslon of the fron 1868 to 1968 pernittlng the dlvlslon of a two Senators lrere apportloned lnto two or more authorlty had never been exercleed by the General refore the lncluslon ln the 1968 amendment of the t the dlvlslon of countles Ln the fornatlon of ln the nLnde of the General Aesenbly and the e in practl.ce. Nor dld lt have any racial notlve been no precedent experlence of the use of lese dietrlcte for members of the Senate, there ie no under euch a dlvlslon of countlee, black voters or nt of the populatlon would have enJoyed advantageg the prevalllng practlce of electlng Senatore t least county-wlde ln extent. The 1968 amendment be the caee from L776 fo " No county ehall be . . ." Oonetltutlon of thl-s conatltuted no cha lt hae been unlformly prlor to 1968 also prohl Representatlve dlstrlctB Eore seats ln the House acknowledge thaE fact t dlstrlcte . . .", a reco for electlng nenbere of Agaln, eince no county RepreeentatLve dletrlcte sub-county dlatrictlng, votlng populatlon would the prevalllng plan of d The clear command dlvtded ln the for^roatlon unlforr praetlce etnce I votera that lt ruould be Lnto potentially conpetl creatlon of leglelatlve couutiee have oany gove the county; theae lnte and the best lntereats o the General Aseenbly lf leo Eade clear what had been unlformly underetood to rd: dlvlded ln the formatlon of a RepreaentatLve Dletrict 868 as amended ln 1968, Irt. II, Sec. 6(3). Agaln, ln the exletLng pattern of apportionnent; lndeed, erstood that the conGtLtutlonal provieLon as lt read lted the eubdlvlelon countlee ln the formatlon of even though a county night be apportloned two or f Representatlves. Ttre 1968 aoendment dLd E - [T]he Repreeentatlves shall be elected from ltlon of the fact that nany multt-county dletrlcte he Houee of Representatives had exlsted elnce 1966. ever been divtded ln the formatlon of there le no baels for epeculatlon that under euch a Lack votere or any other ldentlflable segnent of the enJoyed greater advantage than they enJoyed under Btrlcte conpoeed of one or more whole countlee. the 1968 amendment that countles should never be of Senate or Repreeentative dlstrlcts, 1lke the 76, reflected the convlctlon of leglelators and lee publlc poIlcy for countles to be eubdlvtded lve polltlcal unlto, aB uould llkely follow the lstrlcEB of leea than county-*rlde extent. Ttre ntal and polltlcal interests that extend throughout te oft,en bear upon local or statewlde leglelatlon; the countles could be moet falthfully represented he eountiea were not polltlcally eubdlvlded. That 1n 1e o f' & the pollttcal has nothlng to Judgment do wlth Constltutlon of l97l The North Carollna Conetitutlon that ldaa 8 that eeesioo, eubnltted electlon, and took eff changes ln the provlel apportlonment of the Conetltutlon as Lt read c orrespondlng provlelo are at nost gramoatlca apportlonment of the been brought fonrard ln of the North Caroltna S wae notably true wlth Ilouee of Representatlve formatlon of a Senate I Constltutlon of 1971 r the votere ln 1968. or the voters ln 1969- pollcy agalnet dlvldi It le the provla Aeeembly of t98l acted of the Senate and Houe electlone of 1982 and I hat the prohibltlon under exantnatlon beepeake, and lt aclal conslderatlona. State Constltutlon Study Connlsslon drafted a revleed tted to the General Aeeenbly of 1969, approved by the votere ln 1970, approved by then at that on I July 1971. Ttrat provlelon oade only very of Artlcle II of the Conatltutlon deallng wlth te and Ilouse of Representatives. A comparlaon follorlng the amendnent of 1968 end ln the of the ConetltutLon of 1971 reveals that the mlnor the of the changea governlng General nenberg the 1968, have the proposed text wlth no eubetantlve ch8nge." RePort ate Constltutlon- Study Connnlselon, P. 30 (1968). thle BpecE to the parallel provlelone for the Senate and etatlng that " tdo county shall be dlvlded ln the r RepresenEatlvel Dletrlct . . ." Ihue the terated the pollcy that had been earlter declared by re le no bagle for alleglng that the General Aseembly had a raclal motlve ln reaesertlng the lmmenorlal ftre Connleelon Btated that "the provlsLona houeee, adopted by the people ln Noveuber, countiee ln foralng leglslatlve dletrlcte. e of the Constitutl.on of 1971 under which the n devlslng the dlstrlcte and apportlonnent of of Representatlves among then, effectLve for Bequent years. I s 7. ftllglatlve Representatlon 1on of the Unlted States Dlstrlct Court tn Dru4g[g]!!!!.,Ttre decl 2l[9 r. Supp. (M.D.N.C, L965)r and the resultlng actlon of tbe General Aoseubly ln Latlon have ap1rcrtlon1ng the Eouse of Eepresentatlvee to reflect popu- e obsolete a portlon of the provislons of the North Caro- Ilna Constitu wlth respect to apportlonnent of the House. Whil.e the constltublon provislons governlng apportlorunent of the Senate are not th the federal Constltutlon, they are 1n need. of mlnor1n confllct v clarlfylng re lslon. rt le now crear'that no amendnent vllL be a.dded. to t he federal netltut,ion to pemlt a return to the non-popuratlon besed, schenes of the past. Therefore ve favor anendlng the stateapportionnent Constltutlon sucb rray as to nalce lt conform to current apportl0nment prar:blce. A appendix to rat't of a blll to achieve thls result 1s attached, as an Report. Recommendetion We to conf the arnend$ent of the state Constltutlon ln order the provlslons of that Constltutlon pertalnlng to the of the state Leglalature to the cument practlces in that spect. apport t ]-ll