Affidavit; Correspondence from Brock to Bradford Reynolds; List of North Carolina Constitutional Amendments; Correspondences from Brock to Bradford Reynolds; Memorandum from Sanders to Wallace; Reports of the Legislative Research Commission to the General Assembly of North Carolina, 1967
Public Court Documents
January 1, 1967 - October 6, 1981
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Affidavit; Correspondence from Brock to Bradford Reynolds; List of North Carolina Constitutional Amendments; Correspondences from Brock to Bradford Reynolds; Memorandum from Sanders to Wallace; Reports of the Legislative Research Commission to the General Assembly of North Carolina, 1967, 1967. e1e3d3b7-d892-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/eb224a23-b598-412e-9fbb-923adbec36a9/affidavit-correspondence-from-brock-to-bradford-reynolds-list-of-north-carolina-constitutional-amendments-correspondences-from-brock-to-bradford-reynolds-memorandum-from-sanders-to-wallace-reports-of-the-legislative-research-commission-to-t. Accessed December 05, 2025.
Copied!
I .'.' ; - ', ....'
IIN rllltj UNITED STA'r'ES DISTRICT COURTron-iu{ Eeiirnn DrsTRrcr oF NoRTrr cARoLTNA ".-t ,' 'i3!rl
I RALEIGII DIVTSION
| ''"
''--":)ll
!-;:'-""1t'
'' :::lK
I CIVIL ACTION ,.
;, et .lr. ,
*o' Bl-Bo3-crv-s
[ '
t' +l
llplaintilf f s, )
v. I i AFFTDAVTT
RUF'US EDMISTEN,
". [, ]lr
Def enda[rts. )
I
Alex K. Brock, f,.i.,g duly s\{orn, hereby deposes and
Isays,
I
1. l, afex [<. Brockr drn Secretary-Director of the
state Boarcl of Er..Jcions of North carorina, the of f ices of
Iwhlch are located ale suite B0r, Raleigh Brrildinq, 5 hlest
|---J.-
Hargett Street, nalpigh, North Carolina 2760L;
I2- r have sprved in that capacity continuously since
August 5, 1965, unal was, therefore, serving in that capacity
j-n Lg67 when the c.f,.r.r Assembry of North carolj-na ratified
chapter 640, sessiof, r,.*= ot Lg67, whj-ch contained proposals
Ifor two amendments lto the constitution of North carolina;
I3. Those twp eronosals were approved by vote of the
Ipeople in November pf 1958 and became Article rr, &4(3)
(presentty Arricle Ir, S3 (3) ) and Arri.cle It, S6 (3) lpr.sently
IArticle II 55(3) ) "F the Constitution of l.torth Carolina;
4. Article Ir, 53(3) provides, inter aIia, that the
IGeneral Assembly ofl North Carolina is prohibited from dividing
counties in formingl an. state senate erectoril clistricts;
Article rr, s5(3) nfotia"=, iltgr glig, that the General Assembly
is prohibited from frrrur.,n ;t;; formins state Represenrarive
electoral dlstri.a= |
I
5. As best I reca11, t did not deem these amend.ments to
lev,the State Constitutfon to be subject to the submission requirements
Iof s5 of the votinslnisnts Act of 1965, dt the time of their
adoptlon, and., ther$tore, r did not submit the amendments to the
IAttorney General ofl the Unlted States for approval or seek their
Iapproval by the unifed States District Court for the District of
Columbia,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r*' owever, now advised the Attorney General
tional arnendments, by v,ray of correspondence
ember 22, 23, 24 and 28, 19Bt;
all of my corresponclence to the Attorney
n part the 1968 amendments is attached
ertinent attachments to the correspondence,
session 1aws, the corresponrlence and attach-
ated herein by reference:
ritted al1 information to the Attorney General
f any irnportance or siqnif,icance to a determina-
ether the amendments satisfy the requj-rements
Rights Act of 1965 and have requested that the
: as expedltiously as possible;
so submitted to the Attorney General, for his
.
Chapter 800, Chapter B2I, and Chapter 87,
, these constituting, respectively, North
ment plans for the state House and Senate,
and state Congressi aI electoral districts:
10. I have bmitted all other information deemed by rne
he apportionment p1ans, includinq all
tion requested by the Attorney General.
to be pertinent to
supplernental info
6. I have,
of the 1968 Constit
on the dates of .qep
7. A copy o
General, regarding
hereto, along with
excluding copies of
ments being incorpo
B. I have s
which I deern to be
tion by him as to w
of 55 of the Voting
determination be ma
9. I have a
approval, copj-es of
Session Laws of 198
Carolina's apporti
Sworn to
this the
and subsc ibed
01*H A*",/-
afex
S ecretary-Di rector
North Carolina State
Board of Elections
AFFIANT
before me
October,19BI.
u
?Lz-,J NOTARY
Commission Expi
6ffit' a of
UBLIC
I'1y
ALEX X. BFIOCK
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY -
OIRECTOR
At tention:
In re:
Gentlemen:
at each
by each
mi tted
ATL It()Alrt) ()l.. t.:Lt.:(:t'I()Ns
SutrE 80l RALETcH BurLDrN6
5 WE6T HARGETT STREET
RALETGH. NoRrH Cenoltxe 27601
Sep tember 22, 1981
BROCK AFTTDAVIT
ATTACIII(E}IT T
REGISTERED - RETIIRN RECEIPT
REQUESTED
TELEPHOI.IE
(919| t29-' l'r3
Mr. t{i1Iiam Bradford Rey
Asslstant Attorney Gener
Civil Rights Dlvlslon
United States Department
l{ashington, D. C. 20530
llteracy test or other d
reglster to vote. It is
lds
f Justlce
se measures were submitted after enact-
General Assembly, they are now being sub-
peop 1e.
ice as a precondltion to any indivldual to
n recognltion of the provlsions contained
Mr. Gerald l.I Jones
Sec tion
Carollna
Chief, Voti
State of Nor
Pursuant to provisi of sectlon 5, Voting Rlghts Act of 1965
d and renewed in 1970, we submit the
dments adopted (or defeated) by the
5 November 1968; 3 November 1970; 7 Nov-
Public Law 89-110, as
attached Consti tutional
voters of North Carolina
ember 7972; 5 November 1
4 November 1980. Wtrile
ment by the North Caroli
4; 23 March 1976; 8 November 1977 and
mitted after a vote by
You will note the f 1 text of each numbered amendment submltted
ed as is the total YES and NO vote received
each ballot ls attached hereto with the sub-
election is p
issue. A copy o
result table.
It is critical to a re you that even though Amendment {17 sub-
mitted for vote in the
North Carolina has not,
ember 3, 1970 General Election was defeated,
s not and will not utilize any type of
in the Voting Rishts Act f 1965 applylng to forty (40) counties in
North Carollna as well a rulings by the Federal'Courts that no lit-
eracy test shall be appli in this State.
r.
t
;
t-
f
U
Mr. lftn. Bradford Reynol
We awalt your conf
Attachments: Schedule
(7) Ballor
The undersigned cer
ment together with attac
Assistant U. S. Attorney
ment, Washlngton, D. C.
wlth Return Recelpt Requ
1981.
-2-
tion that no obJectlon ls
Very truly yours,
September 22, 1981
lnterposed.
ATTEST:
t,40
c*/k- {-<L
Notary Pub1ic
Ily comrnlssion explres
eu,*K Er^l
Executive Secretary - Dlrector
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
lfles that he has served the foregolng state-
ment on.the Honorable William Bradford Reynolds,
General, Clvll Rlghts Dlvlsion, Justlce Dlpart-
depositing same ln the U. S. MaiI Registlred
ted, postage prepaid thls 22nd day of September
Executive Secretary-p6r""at
N. C. State Board of Elections
ber 31, 1984.
ISSIJE #
Constitutlona.l Anendrnent estebJJ.shirrg
pnocedure for ffudng cmpensation of
members a^rd offlcers of the Goneral
Assedb\r, ard derrying beneflt of aqp
lacrease il conpernation to nenbors
of Session whlch enacts i.t.
Axnondtrg the Constitution of North
Carollna to require the General
Asse.h\y to reduce the State
Adnlnl,stratlve Departrnents to 25
ard to authorlze the Governor to
reorgani.ze the Adni.nistratlve
Departnents subJect to legislative
NOBTH CAROIJI{A COI,ISTIfl TIO}{AL AUE[.ID][EII?S
DESCRIPTION PROPOSED BY
-
NOVB,IBEB (. 1968
Constltutional
Anerdnent
Iegislature
Ieglslature
VCIIE
rEs NO RESI'LT
573,289 465122.5 Adopted
5&,1633 3n )95 AdoPted
TTPE
#t
#z constitutional Anendnent conti.nuing constltutional
present systen of reprosentati.on Anerdrnent
ln the C,eneral Assernb\r.
it
#z
NOVB{BEB 3. 1970
Revislng ard anerdlng the ConstLtutlon Constltutlonal
of North Caro];lna Anerdnent
Constltutlonal
Anerdrnent
Ieglslature
Iagtslature
393,759
400,892
25Lr732 Adopted
2r,81795 Adopted
#3
ilt+
t5
Ansrd the Constltutlon of North
CeroUna peroJ.ttlng ttrree-flfths
of the mubers of the General
Asseub\y to couveue extra sessjons
of the General Assenb\r.
Bsvising those portlons of the pnesent
or proposed State Constitutton
concertdng State ard local finances.
Anending the Constltutlon of North
Carollna to authorlze the C,eneral
Aseeub\y to fix personal exenptions
for i.ncoe toc prrposes.
Constltutlona].
Anerdnent
Constltuttonal
Anendnent
Constltutlonal
Arerdnent
Ioglslature
LeglsJature
332,98L 285r5gl Adopted
323,13L 281,087 Adopted
rrlcr- r
Iaglslature 336,66o 282r6n Adopted
ISSIJE # TTPE
#6 Anending the Constltution of North
Carollna to pnovlde that after
June 30, I97I, the escheats sha]-l
be used to aid North CaroHna
residents enrolled tn ary prrb}lc
lnstttutlon of hlgher educatlon
in thig State.
#? Anendilg the Constitutlon of North
Carolina by abolishi.ng the literacy
reErlrement for voting.
NORTH CAROLIM CCI{STfTUTfON[L AUEI,TDMEIfIS
LESCRTPTION
Constltuti,onal
Anerdnent
ConstLtutlonal
Anerdnent
Iaglslatrrre 2?g rt32 355r34? Defeated
?62r65L l+25
'7@ Adopted
811r/*t*O 3c\rt*99 Adopted
VOTE
-2
NO RESTILT
48rl+5l
PROPOSED BII
Iegtslature
Iaglslatnre
I.egts)atrrne
ES
362rog7
NOVB{BER 7. 1a72
#t Anendlng the Constltutlon of North
Caro}Lna reducing the voting age
to 18 years and pnovidlng that
on\y persons 2l years of age or
older shall 66 stigible for
elective office.
#Z .Anerding the Constituil.on of North
Carol-lna to requl.re the General
Assemb\y to pnescribe ng)cillluln
age 'l { ni ts for senrlce ag a
Corutltutlonal
.Anerdnent
Constltutlonal
Amerdnent
#3
#4
Anerdlng the Constltuion of North
Carollna authorlzing the Creneral
Asseub\y to pescribe pnocedures
for the cerutung ard renonal of
Jwtlces and Judges of the C,eneral
Court of rlustlce.
Anerding the ConstLtutlon of Nozth
Carolina to conserrre and protect
North Carolinats natural resources.
Anending the Constltutlon of North
CarolLna 'l i ni filg i.ncorlrcratj.on
of cltles and torrns.
Constitutlonal
Anerd:nent
Constltutlonal
Amerdment
Constltutlonal
Anerdnent
Iaglslatrrre
Iegisla,ture
807,960 272r1+7O Adoptad
976,58L 1J*6 1995 Adopted
#5 Leglslature 694,g2L 3?4'].84 Adopted
ISSUE # TTPE
NOBTH CAROIJM COI,ISTITUTIONAL AI,{ENDUEI\IIE
DESCBIPTION
-
PBOPOSED BII
-
NOIIEI,IBER <. 1O7I
Iagtslature
IegLelature
-3
VqIE
]ES NO NESIITT
4?l+,Lgg 49 rl+52 Adopted
317 1285 376'269 Defeated
#t constltutionar Anerdnent clranglng the constltutlonal
title of the Constltutlonal offlce Anerdnent
of tSollcltorr to rDlstrict Attorney. r
#2 constltuttonsr Ansndrnent to create constltutlonal
Jobs and enploJrn€nt opportunities Anendnent
and to pnotect the envlronment by
authorlzing the issuance of nevenue
bond^: to finance lrdustrial ard
pollutlon control facilltles anong
others for industry ard the rati-
fication, validatlon, conflrmation
ard appnova1 of Chapter 633 of the
1971 Session Iars as anended, by Chapter
476 of tfu 19?3 Session Iaws o-f ttre'
Genoral Asse-h\y wtrich inplenents
the foregoing 8rd of the pnoceedlngg
talcen prsrrant thereto by ary cowrty
of the State in the creation of a
irdustrta]. fact't{tles flnanchg
authority rnd a'l'l proceedings by an
author{.ty so created in authorizlng
the financlng of lrdrrstrial ard
pollution control facll:Lties.
i-'\.*\. -,
NoRTH CAnoLIM CONSTIIUTIoML AI{ENIMAIIS
ISSIJE # TTPE
-
DESCRIPTION
MAnCH 2?. Ia75
#f Constltutlona]. Amerdnent to perrtt Constltutlonal
the C,eneral Asse-hfy to enact Anerdnent
general laws to authorlze the
Stat€, corntles, cltles or tonns,
ard other Steto ard local gov€r[-
nental entlties to Lssue revenue
bords to flnance or reflnance fon
ary such governuontal entlty or
aqf nonprofit prlnate corporatlon,
regardless of argr church or reli.glous
relationship, the cost of acquirlng,
constnrcting Brd flnanclng health
satt fgs{I{ty poJects, such bonds
to be payable lbon the revemes,
grosrs or net, of aqp such pnoJects
aad ary other health gatt fssl'l{tlss
of ary such gwernnentel entiry or
nonpnotlt private corporatlon pledged
therefor.
#Z Constltutlonal Anerdnent to perntt the. Constltutlonal
Iaglsl^ature
Legls)ature
PBOPOSED BT
-
-4
VqTE
IES NO NESULT
3&rog3 3ILr3@ Adopted
3n '$3 3A+r938 Adopted
General Assenb\y to enact general
lawE to authorize corrnti-es to creato
Amendrent
to flrance, but not to refirence,
the cost of capltal pnoJects consistLng
of l-ndtrsttC€,1, rnanrfacturirlg ald
pollutlon control f6g{'l{fiss for lndustry
ard pollution contlpJ- fEgirrties for Snrbllcuti.}ltles, ard to refirrd such bonds, such
bonds to be secured by and payeble on\y
from nevenues or pnoperty derlved fron
pnlvate parties and ln no event to be
secured by or pagrable fron ary prbJ-ic
none!rc rdratsoever.
i'**- r
-5
ISSI'E # TIPE
-
-
#f Constltutlonal Amerdnent extendlng.to a narrled nan (as a marrled
wo'man now has) the right to recelve
the homestead exempti.on is. avallable
to the sunriving spouee of the owner
of a homestead, lf the oyrner dies
leaulng no ntnor chlldren and the
sunriving Epouse does not own &
separate hmestead.
#Z Constltutlonal Anerdnent aJ*lorlng
every person the rlght to insure
hls or her }lfe for the beneflt of
his or her spouse or children or
both, free fron a'l t claims of the
repnesentatives or creditors of
the insured or his or her estate.
NoRTH CAROLTI{A CONSTIIT TIoML Al,tENpl(ENIs
DESCRIPTION PBOPGED BT
- -
NOVE.{BER 8. Iq77
Constitutlonal
Amendment
Iegls)ature
Constltutlonsl
Ansrdrcnt
Iaglslature
Ieglslature
VOTE
IBS
5t7
'366
fis,52l,
3Vl,754
NO NESULT
59'?U Adopted
5? '835 ldopted
278r0l3 Adopted#3 constltutlonal Anerdment enporvering constltuttonal
the quali.fled voters of the State lmendnent
to elect the Governor ard Lteutenant
Goverzror to a second successlve terr
of the Eare office.
. Srj-u :'
L---..--. ;
NORTH CAROLINA CONSTINNIONAL AI.{ENDMEMS
PROPOSED EIT
Iagislature
VqIE
-6
NO RESULT
1801624 Adopted
rssrrE # gPE DESCRTPTION
#4 Constltutlonal Anerdnent to pemit Constitutlonal
ururlclpalitles orning or operating Anerdnent
electric generatlon, transmission
or distrlbutlon facil{tles and Joint
agencies conposed of such murdcl-
palities to cwn, operate ard naintaln
general and transmisslon fss{'li flse
with arsr pereon, firm, assoclatlon
or corporetion, p$I:Lc or private,
, engaged in the generatlonr trans-
mission or distribution of electrlc
power and enerry for resale (each,
respectlve\r, ra co-orner) ritfrU
thls State of angr state contiguous
to this State, ard to issue electric
revenue bords to finance the cost of
the ornership share of such muricl-
palitles or Jolnt agencies, such bords
to be secured by and pa;rable on\r fron
the electric revernres of such Brrlcl-
palitles or Jolnt agencies and pnovlding
that no money or pnoperty of such mrnicl-
paJ-lties or Joint agencies shal-l be
credj.ted or applied to the account of
arry such co-ol{ner.
t:Es
3t+gry)5
#5 Constitutlonal Anerdnent requiring that
the total exponditures of the State
for the fiscal perlod correr"ed by the
State budget shall not occeed the
total of revenues raised during that
flscal period and ary surplus rcnal*-
ing ln the State Treasu4r at the
beglnning of the pertd, and requirlng
the Governor to effect the necessarlr
econonles in Stat€ ecpenditures wherp
ever he determines that a deflclt Ls
threatened.
Constitutional
Anendnent
Ieglsl^Btrrre t*3 1453 LOI+'935 MoPted
frK"Er
-',
@
vorE
ISIiIIE # TI?E DESCRIPTIOI PROFGED BI Tll NO REiI,IJ
EU4trEE-&rJSp
#1 CoDltJ,tuti@a1 lDstdDent requkfDg CdlgtLtutl,otl8J. LgilLitur. @1634 35217\ Adopt d
JurtJ.coe qrd Judgcg of tho suFlur llodrlt
Court, Court o! AppeaLs, SuFtr.or
Court ad DiEtrtct oourt to be duJJr
autborLa6d to FctLca Lsr Flor
to slrctLon or eppotrtront.
SubuLtted by the State Board of ELectlons of
North Carol5.na thls 22rd day of Septeuber 1981.
ClzxM
Facecutive Secretartrr-Dlrector
It{
ALEX K, BROCX
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY -
OIRECTOR
In re:
Gentlemen:
Under
submi tted
submi tted
ments were
Mr. lftn Bradford Reyno
AssisTant Attorney Ge
Civil Rlghts Dlvision
United States Departm
Washington, D. C. 2O5
Attention: Mr. Geral
Chief, Vo
State of
date of 22
a schedule
to voters a
voted on.
At direction of
eral for Legal Affatr
acts authorizing the
will be transmitted u
We are prompted
conversation with Mr.
ments other than the
When he recelved our
that we lnclude in ou
the facts to Asslstan
The amendment #2
much as the wrlter intno change ln electl
ATI' It( ),\ttl) ( )I.' t.:1,t.:(.-l'I():{s
SUrTE' 80l RALEtcx BurLorNo
5 WEE' HARGETT STREET
RALEToH. NoFTH Cenourxe 27(,,01
September 23, 1981
BROCK ATFIDAVIT
ATTACHMENT II
REGISTERED - RETURN RECEIPT
REQUESTED
Wallace, Deputy Attorney Gen-
coples of the legislatlve
amendments. These Documents
a matter of a few days.
TELEPHOI{E
(919t E29-7 r73
ds
ra1
nt of Justice
lr. Jones
ing Sectlon
rth Carolina
September 1981 (Registered No. 28254) rhis office
f Constitutlonal Amendments along wlth ballots
each statewlde election ln whlch subJect amend-
ounsel, Mr. James M.
, rde are accumulatlng
te on the submitted
er separate cover in
point out that Mr. Wallace, during a telephone
Reynol.ds, was totally unaware that there were amend-
submltted at an election held on 5 November 1968.
chedule of amendment elections Mr. Wallace requested
letter that he.ln no way attempted to mlsrepresent
Attorney General Reynolds.
voted on ln 1968 was not previously submitted inas-
rpreted the effect of the amendment to constltute
or votlng procedure. t
Mr. l{rn Bradford Re lds
Flnally, due to
clate your consldera
tlotary Publtc
My Cornmlssion explre
-2-
ndlng actlon ln
on ln expedltlng
Very truly
September 23r 1981
Federal Court we wl1l greatly appre-
these matters
yours,
Qu<8A
Executive Secretary
N. C. State Board of
- Director
Elections
October 31, 1984.
ALEX K. BROCK
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY -
OI RECTO R
Mr. l,Im Bradford R
Assistant Attorney
CivtI Rlghts Divis
United States Depa
Washington, D. C.
At tentlon:
In re:
Mr. Ge
Chief,
State
Cons t,i
Gentl emen:
We transmit h
electlons to be he
ments proposed by
of the quallfied v
supplement the inf
ember 1981 (Regist
tnformation referr
istered No. 28268)
The writer ha
acts proposing Con
electlon or voting
Chapter 640 S
1200 Sesslon
Laws of 1977i
Chapter 363 S
The submisslo
amendments not p
ATL IT( )AIr l) ()t.' !.:LD(..1.I()NS
SUITE 80I RALEIoH BUILDINo
5 WE3T HARGE'T STREET
RALEToH. NoRrH Cenolrxe 2ZAOI
September 24, 1981
BROCK AFFIDAVIT
ATTACIIIIENT TIT
REGISTERED . RETURN RECEIPT
REQUESTED
T EL E PHO,.I E
(0lot t29-? tr3
no lds
Genera I
on
tment of Justice
0530
a1d tI.
Vo ting
Jones
Section
Caro I ina
Amendments, Supplemental
f North
tional
rewith coples of legislative acts authorizing
d on whether or not the ConstitutionaL Amend-
he submltted acts shall be approved by a vote
ters ln North Carolina. These submisslons
rmation transmitted by our letter dated 22 Sept-
red No. 28254) and constitute the addttlonal
to in our letter dated 23 September 1981 (Reg-
undertaken to burden you only wlth Ieglslative
titutional Amendments that deal generally with
practlces. They are:
ssion Laws of 1967i Chapters 7258, 1004,
ws of 1969; Chapters 201, 535, 857 Session
Chapter 394 Session Laws of 1973; and
sslon Laws of L977.
s transmltted herewith constitute all acts and
ously submitted deallng with areas covered
Mr. l{m Bradford Rey lds -2-
under the Votln ts Act of 1965.
We wl11 apprec
Attachments: (9)
The underslgne
statement together
Jones, Chief, Votl
ington, D. C. by de
wlth Return Recelpt
September 1981.
ATTEST:
1,, .i tr. J
Notary Publlc
My Conunlsslon expire October 31,1984.
September 24,1981
te your expeditlous handltng of thls matter.
Very truly yours,
C/r"*,d 8r*.L
Executlve Secretary - Dlrector
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
certifles that he has served the foregoing
th attachments on the Honorable Gerald lI.
Section, U. S. Department of Justlce, Wash-
siting same ln the U. S. MalI registered
equested, postage prepaid this 24th day of
Cz./K Brra
J
r"
ALEX K. BROCK
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY -
DIRECTOR
Attention:
In re:
Gentlemen:
Mr. IE Bradford Reynold
Assistant Attorney Gene
Civtl Rights Divlsion
United States Departmen
l.lashington, D. C. 20530
Mr. Gerald
Chief, Voti
State
Cons ti
of No
tu ti
Transmitted herewi
/11 and ll2 relative to
(Registered No . 28254);
ember 1981 (Reglstered
Exhibit ll1 represe
Exhibit {12 is a hisrory
Constitution and should
s tanding.
Both of these do
the Institute of Gover
Institute of Government
Carollna ln research a
Cons ti tu tion.
Trusting these fur
Attachments: (2)
BROCK AFTIDAVIT
AFFIDAVIT IV
TII I t( ),\ t< t ) ( )If l.:I.t.:( -l.I( ,NS
SUITE. 80I RALEIGH. BUILDING
5 WE6T HARGETT STREET
RALETGH. NonrH CenolrNt 276c l
September 28r 1981
REGISTERED . RETURN RECEIPT
REOUESTED
aI
of Justlce
Jones
Sectlon
th Carolina
1 Amendments, Supplemental
you will find additional supplemental exhlbits
r prevlous transmittals dated 22 September 1981
23 September 1981 (Regtstered 28268); and 24 Sept-
28277) .
ts the
TELEPHONE
(9t9' 7!3-rr7!
f the
rovide
orlgln of the amendment voted on ln 1968.
evolution of the North Carollna State
an adequate background for clearer under-
nts were prepared by John Sanders, Dlrector of
nt of the University of North Carollna. The
eguLarly assists the General Assembly of North
development of leglslation dealing with the
er documents will assist ln your review we are,
Very truly yours,
eu// 8
Executlve Secretary - Director
I
j
I.,
r'a
.;t
{
c
t,_. - .
t,.
The underslgned
ment together with at
Voting Sectlon, Civll
Washington, D. C. by
Return Recelpt Reguest
1981.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
rtlfies that he has served the foregolng state-
chments on the Honorable Gerald W. Jones, Chlef,
lghts Divlslon, U. S. Department of Justice,
lting same ln the U. S. Mall Reglstered wlth
, postage prepald thls 28th day of September,
ATTEST:
t(.<cL(
Notary Publlc
My conrnlsslon explrel
0a, n 8r*r/*
Executlve Secretary-Director
N. C. State Board of Elections
tober 31, L984.
r,,t.
t
I
I
'{'
+
,..
TO:
FROM:
OATEr
INSTITUT
T}iE UNIVERSITY OF
Memorandutn.
Jlrn Wallace
John Sandera
9l23l8L
SUBJECT:
taaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaa
Thle ls the
proposed by the
in 1968. As I
The amendment not coneldered more than a Job of neatenlng-up
the Constltutlon
General AeeeubJ.y
Court ln Drum.
nake lt reflect the reallty followlng the
e actlon ln compllance wlth the order of the
ORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 27514
OF GOVERNMENT
ExurErT -4 /
epeclflc orlgln of the constltutlonal amendment
L967 GeneraL Aseenbly and ratlfled by the voters
1, I worked wlth Herbert Hyde on thls subJect.
t
.7
aai
r. r(:
3ii
#.-;
*i;
!i
ai
(
Y
n
H. P. Taylor, Jr.
Robert B. Morgan,
Member
Senator
Senator
Senator
Senator
Senator
ISTATIVE RESEARCH COMMISSION
1965 196?
Co-Chairmen:
eaker of the House
Pro Tempore
Representatives, 1965-66
the Sinate, 1965-66esident
of
of
Mem Anooi
n Belk
ert L. Hyde
M. Mi11s,
Seay,
White
es entative
es entative
esentative
esentative
es entative
th Pres id
Jr.
Jr.
Philip
Claude
Hugh S.
Dwight
Wayland
he Soeak
P. Godwin
M. Hamrick
Johnson, Jr.
W. Quinn
J. Sermons
IN
r
He
Fr
Th
Th
ed
Rep
Rep
R
Rep
Rep
eta the C Ls st_on
Itlrs. Fred M. Benton
I
V
a
Report No. I
REPOBO ON
ASSEI'IBLI OF NOffE C,AR0LIIIA
North Carollna
slatlve Reaearch Coomlaslon
Rd.elgh
L96T
$;
I
I
,
I?
:'
MEIroRAl,lDtl'{
TO:
FRO}I:
DATE:
STEJECT:
Jamee l{allace
John Sanderp
September 24-\
The Subdlvlel
Dlstrlcte for
North Carol
Ttre purpoae of thl
provlelons of the Conet
establlstment of dlstr
Houee of Repreeentatlv
whether and when a couu
L979-193s
Fron 1976 through
the Senate ahould cone
of Commone should conel
elected one from each of
electlon dletrlct for
apportloned to each c
fornlng senate dlstrlcta
aleo the dlatrlct for
for the borough nenbera)
of countl.ee ln fornlng s
98r
of
the
Et.atst 7 *2
Countlee ln Drawtng Senate and Repreeentative
Electlon of lGrnbers of the General Aesenbly of
memorandum le to trace the evolutlon of the
to the
the Senate and
the queatlon of
euch a dletrlct.
utlon of North Carollna wlth respect
for the electlon of the menbere of
wlth partlcular to the attentton of
nay be dlvlded ln the formatlon of
35, the Constltutlon of North Carollna provlded that
of one member elected fron each county and the Houee
of two membere elected from each county plue nenbere
alx (later eeven) boroughs. The county wae the
bers of the Senate and wlth only one Senator
Ir no queetlon of the subdlvlslon of countlee ln
arose. Conetltutlon of L776, Sec. 2. The county wag
election of uembere of the Houee of Cor"mona (except
and the Constltutlon dld not authorlze the dlvislon
h dletrtcte. C,onetl.tutlon of L776, Sec. 3.
I
t
:
*
I
v
1836-1858
Ttre State Constltu
then nade repreeentatl
Senators " to be elect,ed
Asaenbly " ln proportlon
State . . ., ?rovided,
Senatorlal dLetrlct."
1835 anendmente, the
countlee ae unlte, with
was compoeed of 120 nen
thecountleg...."
member, lrreepecttve of
fulflllnent of that gua
countlee accordtng to a
1835, Art. I, Sec. l, P
requlring s lngle-c ounty
granted to the General
electlon dlstrlcte. Sl
Anendnente of 1835, the
dlatrlcts could have
1868-r968
The Conetltutlon
Anendmente of I835 that
nembere of the llouee of
1on
of
wa8 extenelvely amended ln 1835. Ttre Senate wag
property (neaeured lndlrectly by atate taxee) wlth
dlstrlcts" decennlally establlehed by the General
to the publlc taxee paid lnto the Treasury of the
at no county ehall be dlvlded ln the foruatlon of a
ndmente'of 1835, Art. I, Sec. l, Par. l. Under the
ee of Commone wae Eade rnalnly representaElve of the
eome leavenlng for populatlon. The Houee of Conmone
r8r ".blennlalLy choeen by ballot, to be elected by
ery county was guaranteed the rlght to elect one
lts populatlon, and the members rernatnlng after the
antee were apportLoned anong the nore populoue
fornula preecrlbed by the Conetltutlon. Anendnente of
t. 2. Ttrle provlslon was unlformly treated ae
lotrlcta for Commona membere, and no power tras
eenbly to dlvlde or comblne counttes ln formlng
blacke were not pernltted to vote under the
prohlbltlon agaLnet dlvtdlng countlee ln fornlng
no racial purpose or effect.
pted ln 1868 retalned the baelc conceptlon of the
fron digtrlctg and that
elected from countles.
Senatore ehould be elected
Representatl.vee ehould be
*
^
0
The Conetltutlon
dletrlcte ehould be ea
contaln "8s nearly aB
and IndLans not taxed .
of a Senate DlstrLct,
nore Senators." Ihle
alngle county contalned
or more Senatore would
electlon dletricte. In
nore than one Senator to
act of 1963. Ar thar t
dlstrlct compoeed of l&
to the dletrlct compoeed
subseguent tlne to dlvl
as the Conetltutlon wouL
The House of Repr
Sece. 6 and 7, continued
House of Comnona under
fact that the whole po
calculatlng the apportLo
aeat per county had been
provlded " that the llouse
and twenty Repreaentatl
countLes reapectlvely .
rraa no provlslon for the
1868, Art. II, Sec. 5, preacrlbed that the Senate
lahed on the baele of populatlon so that each ehould
be, an equal number of lnhabltanta, excludlng allena
t i and no county ehall be dlvlded ln the fornatlon
ess euch county ehall be equltably entltled to two or
vlelon comtenplated that only Ln the event that a
flclent lnhabltantB to cauae it to be allocated two
t county be eubJect to dlvislon lnto two or more
act, the GeneraL Aseenbly never saw flt to allocate
any elngJ.e-county dletrlct until the apportionment
, three Senate aeata were apporttoned to the
enburg County and two aenate eeata hrere apportLoned
of Foreyth County. No effort was made then or at any
thoee countlee lnto two or three electlon dlstricte
have alloned.
tatlves under the Conetltutlon of 1868, Art. II,
to be apportloned ln the eame mrnner as had been the
Conetltutlonal Anendnente of 1835, save for the
atlon and not the federal population was ueed ln
t, of eeate left over after the guarantee of one
eatlefled. Ttre Constttutlon, lrt. II, Sec. 6,
of Repreeentatlves ehall be composed of one hundred
s, blennlally chosen by balIot, to be elected by the
. ." the county rra6 the electlon dletrlct. Ttrere
conblnatlon of countLee or the dlvlalon into two or
\,
,,\
[lore electlon dletrlcte
of the Houee of Repres
for the dlvlslon of
exlst.
The eynpathy of t
1868, for votlng by b
black males 21 yeara of
that ConventLon underet
ln the formatLon of J.eg
dteadvantaglng black vo
Drum v. Seawell
As a reeult of an
Court for the lflddle Dl
declared the exlstlng a
Repreeentatlves to be I
ordered both houseg to
found no fault wlth the
apportlonnent of the St
among dlstrlcte. It f
of the llouee of Repre
every county could be
remalning twenty membe
proportlon to populat
the provlelong of the S
afforded at Least one
atlves. In
of countlee
4
that were apportloned two or Eore menbere
the abeence of a conetltutlonal provlalon
underetood that auch authorlty dld nottlee, lt wae
Conventlon of 1868, whlch franed the Conetltutl.on of
ks waa lndlsputable; lt opened the franchiee to all
age. Ttrerefore lE 18 lmprobable that the members of
the ltnltatlone they lnpoeed on dlvldlng countles
elatlve dlstrlcte to have had the purpose or effect of
er8.
tlon (Drun v. Seawell) brought ln the Unlted DletrLct
trlct of North Carolina 1n 1965, a three-Judge court
rtlonment of the North CarolLna Senate and Houee of
vl.olatlon of the Unlted States Constltutlon and
e reapportloned on the baele of populatton. Ttre court
exlstlng state constltutlonal provlslon governlng the
t,e Senate, slnce lt requlred equall.ty of populatlon
nd that the exletlng provlslon governtng apportlorunent
tatlves waa Lnvalld becauee there rras no way ln whlch
aranteed one of the 120 members of the Eouee and the
eEl1l be eo apportLoned that equal representatlon ln
could achleved. Accordlngly, the court held "that
ate Constltutlon requlrlng that each county be
presenEetlve regardleee of lts populatlon and the
\,
o
lmplenentlng statute (N.
Protectlon provlaione of
VOld."
hrreuant to the ma
January of 1966 and rea
Repreaentatlvea. Ttre pl
three-Judge federal cour
1970. Those plane dld
Repreeentatlve dletrlcte
dld the court t,ake excep
5
.G.S. L20-2) to be ln vlolatlon of the Equal
the Fourteenth Amendment and therefore nul1 and
te of the federal court, the General Aseenbly net
rtloned the State Senate and House of
lt then adopted were aubeequentLy approved by the
and controlled the electtons of L966, I968, and
t dlvide countlee ln the foruatlon of Senate or
No protee rnade of that fact at the tlme, nor
lon to that fact on lts own account.
L967
the
read
Constltutlonal Anendnent f 1958
The Leglslatlve Re arch Commlaelon flled wlth the General Assenbly of
h several aepecte of the organlzatlon and servlcee ofa report deallng wl
General Aaeenbly of
as follows:
rth Carol-lna. One recommendatlon of that report
We recommend the ndnent of the State Conetltutlon ln order to conform
the provlslons of t t Constitutlon pertal.nlng to the apportlonment of
the State Leglela e to the current practlcea ln that reepect.
That brlef sectlon f the report of the Leglslatlve Research Connieslon
the 1966 extra eesslon of the General Assenbly in
of the court Ln Drum v. Seawelt, 'made obeelete a
noted that the action of
of the North Carollna Constltutlon wlth reepect to
B€o l{hlLe the Conetltutional provlelone governing
are not ln confllct wlth the Federal Conetltutlon,
they are ln need of nl.no clarlfylng revlston." A b111 to carry out the
q
v
recommendatlon of the Leg
General Aeeembly of 1967'
membere of each houae, ra
1968, and took effect u
The adoptlon of thle ane
membere of the Senate and
memberg rdere then elected
of Senate dletrlcts and t
were rewrltten ln the lnt
waa the declaratlon that
SenateDistrlct. .. ."
Sec. 4 (3). Ttrle Provlsl
Congtltution ae lt had r
county to whlch more than
electoral dletrLcts. The
Aeaenbly, however, and th
abeolute prohlbltton agal
Senate dlstrlcta constit
voters of the State no c
or effect. There havlng
than county-wlde elect
baele for epeculatlon t
any other Partlcular I
that they dld not enJoY
from dletrlctg that were
latlve Reeearch Connlealon t aa subnltted to the
pproved by the requlalte three-flfthe of all the
fled by the votere of the State ln November of
the certiflcatlon of the amendment late ln 1968.
nt made no change ln the actual aPPortlonnent of
use of Representatlves or ln dlstrLcts frorn whlch
Ttre provielons wlth respect to the establlstment
apporttonnent of Senatore among thoae dletrl'ets
et of clarity. Ttre only posslbly new provlslon
No county shall be dtvlded ln the fomatlon of a
Conetltutlon of 1868 as anended ln 1868, Art. II,
appeare to reverae tn part that Provlslon of the
fron 1868 to 1968 pernittlng the dlvlslon of a
two Senators lrere apportloned lnto two or more
authorlty had never been exercleed by the General
refore the lncluslon ln the 1968 amendment of the
t the dlvlslon of countles Ln the fornatlon of
ln the nLnde of the General Aesenbly and the
e in practl.ce. Nor dld lt have any racial notlve
been no precedent experlence of the use of lese
dietrlcte for members of the Senate, there ie no
under euch a dlvlslon of countlee, black voters or
nt of the populatlon would have enJoyed advantageg
the prevalllng practlce of electlng Senatore
t least county-wlde ln extent.
The 1968 amendment
be the caee from L776 fo
" No county ehall be
. . ." Oonetltutlon of
thl-s conatltuted no cha
lt hae been unlformly
prlor to 1968 also prohl
Representatlve dlstrlctB
Eore seats ln the House
acknowledge thaE fact t
dlstrlcte . . .", a reco
for electlng nenbere of
Agaln, eince no county
RepreeentatLve dletrlcte
sub-county dlatrictlng,
votlng populatlon would
the prevalllng plan of d
The clear command
dlvtded ln the for^roatlon
unlforr praetlce etnce I
votera that lt ruould be
Lnto potentially conpetl
creatlon of leglelatlve
couutiee have oany gove
the county; theae lnte
and the best lntereats o
the General Aseenbly lf
leo Eade clear what had been unlformly underetood to
rd:
dlvlded ln the formatlon of a RepreaentatLve Dletrict
868 as amended ln 1968, Irt. II, Sec. 6(3). Agaln,
ln the exletLng pattern of apportionnent; lndeed,
erstood that the conGtLtutlonal provieLon as lt read
lted the eubdlvlelon countlee ln the formatlon of
even though a county night be apportloned two or
f Representatlves. Ttre 1968 aoendment dLd
E - [T]he Repreeentatlves shall be elected from
ltlon of the fact that nany multt-county dletrlcte
he Houee of Representatives had exlsted elnce 1966.
ever been divtded ln the formatlon of
there le no baels for epeculatlon that under euch a
Lack votere or any other ldentlflable segnent of the
enJoyed greater advantage than they enJoyed under
Btrlcte conpoeed of one or more whole countlee.
the 1968 amendment that countles should never be
of Senate or Repreeentative dlstrlcts, 1lke the
76, reflected the convlctlon of leglelators and
lee publlc poIlcy for countles to be eubdlvtded
lve polltlcal unlto, aB uould llkely follow the
lstrlcEB of leea than county-*rlde extent. Ttre
ntal and polltlcal interests that extend throughout
te oft,en bear upon local or statewlde leglelatlon;
the countles could be moet falthfully represented
he eountiea were not polltlcally eubdlvlded. That
1n
1e
o
f'
&
the pollttcal
has nothlng to
Judgment
do wlth
Constltutlon of l97l
The North Carollna
Conetitutlon that ldaa 8
that eeesioo, eubnltted
electlon, and took eff
changes ln the provlel
apportlonment of the
Conetltutlon as Lt read
c orrespondlng provlelo
are at nost gramoatlca
apportlonment of the
been brought fonrard ln
of the North Caroltna S
wae notably true wlth
Ilouee of Representatlve
formatlon of a Senate I
Constltutlon of 1971 r
the votere ln 1968.
or the voters ln 1969-
pollcy agalnet dlvldi
It le the provla
Aeeembly of t98l acted
of the Senate and Houe
electlone of 1982 and
I
hat the prohibltlon under exantnatlon beepeake, and lt
aclal conslderatlona.
State Constltutlon Study Connlsslon drafted a revleed
tted to the General Aeeenbly of 1969, approved by
the votere ln 1970, approved by then at that
on I July 1971. Ttrat provlelon oade only very
of Artlcle II of the Conatltutlon deallng wlth
te and Ilouse of Representatives. A comparlaon
follorlng the amendnent of 1968 end ln the
of the ConetltutLon of 1971 reveals that the
mlnor
the
of the
changea
governlng
General
nenberg
the
1968, have
the proposed text wlth no eubetantlve ch8nge." RePort
ate Constltutlon- Study Connnlselon, P. 30 (1968). thle
BpecE to the parallel provlelone for the Senate and
etatlng that " tdo county shall be dlvlded ln the
r RepresenEatlvel Dletrlct . . ." Ihue the
terated the pollcy that had been earlter declared by
re le no bagle for alleglng that the General Aseembly
had a raclal motlve ln reaesertlng the lmmenorlal
ftre Connleelon Btated that "the provlsLona
houeee, adopted by the people ln Noveuber,
countiee ln foralng leglslatlve dletrlcte.
e of the Constitutl.on of 1971 under which the
n devlslng the dlstrlcte and apportlonnent of
of Representatlves among then, effectLve for
Bequent years.
I
s
7. ftllglatlve Representatlon
1on of the Unlted States Dlstrlct Court tn Dru4g[g]!!!!.,Ttre decl
2l[9 r. Supp. (M.D.N.C, L965)r and the resultlng actlon of tbe General
Aoseubly ln
Latlon have
ap1rcrtlon1ng the Eouse of Eepresentatlvee to reflect popu-
e obsolete a portlon of the provislons of the North Caro-
Ilna Constitu wlth respect to apportlonnent of the House. Whil.e the
constltublon provislons governlng apportlorunent of the Senate are not
th the federal Constltutlon, they are 1n need. of mlnor1n confllct v
clarlfylng re lslon. rt le now crear'that no amendnent vllL be a.dded. to
t he federal netltut,ion to pemlt a return to the non-popuratlon besed,
schenes of the past. Therefore ve favor anendlng the stateapportionnent
Constltutlon sucb rray as to nalce lt conform to current apportl0nment
prar:blce. A
appendix to
rat't of a blll to achieve thls result 1s attached, as an
Report.
Recommendetion
We
to conf
the arnend$ent of the state Constltutlon ln order
the provlslons of that Constltutlon pertalnlng to the
of the state Leglalature to the cument practlces
in that spect.
apport t
]-ll