Memo from Tegeler to File Re: Definitions of "Minimally Adequate Education" and "Equal Educational Opportunity"
Working File
December 21, 1992
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Memo from Tegeler to File Re: Definitions of "Minimally Adequate Education" and "Equal Educational Opportunity", 1992. c57b3a86-a346-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/eb53726f-3454-4136-b29b-b899abc5f176/memo-from-tegeler-to-file-re-definitions-of-minimally-adequate-education-and-equal-educational-opportunity. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
TO: Sheff File
FROM: Philip Tegeler
RE: Definitions of "Minimally Adequate Education" and "Equal
Educational Opportunity"
DATE: September 28, 1992/Revised December 21, 1992
MINIMALLY ADEQUATE EDUCATION
Gary Natriello’s definition: "An education that gives child
a chance of leading a successful adult life." Leading indicators
include percentage of children who do not complete high school;
percentage of children who do not complete high school in four
years; percentage of children scoring below remedial level on
mastery tests.
Abbott v. Burke (New Jersey): "Disadvantaged children will
not be able to compete in, and contribute to, the society entered
by the relatively advantaged children," 100 N.J. ; 296, 495
A.2d 376 ) (Abbott I).
Robinson v. Cahill (New Jersey): "Thorough and efficient"
education is one that will "equip a child for his role as a
citizen and as a competitor in the labor market," 62 N.J.
515, 303 A.24 273° ¢( ¥
"A Jeffersonian Compact" (National Conference of Governors,
September, 1989): Minimally adequate education definable in
terms of "the knowledge and skills required in an economy in
which our citizens must be able to think for a living."
Connecticut Common Core of Learning (adopted January 7,
1989): Adopted by the state Board of Education as its definition
of the "standard of an educated citizen and its policy on the
skills, knowledge and attitudes that are expected of
Connecticut’s public secondary school graduates."
Rose v. Council for Better Education (Kentucky): [A]n
efficient system of education must have as its goal to provide
each and every child with at least the seven following
capacities: (i) sufficient oral and written communication skills
to enable students to function in a complex and rapidly changing
civilization; (ii) sufficient knowledge of economic, social, and
political systems to enable the student to make informed choices;
* $
»
(iii) sufficient understanding of governmental processes to
enable the student to understand the issues that affect his or
her community, state, and nation; (iv) sufficient self-knowledge
and knowledge of his or her mental and physical wellness; (Vv)
sufficient grounding in the arts to enable each student to
appreciate his or her cultural and historical heritage; (vi)
sufficient training or preparation for advanced training in
either academic or vocational fields so as to enable each child
to choose and pursue life work intelligently; and (vii)
sufficient levels of academic or vocational skills to enable
public school students to compete favorably with their
counterparts in surrounding states, in academics or in the job
market. _ ..Xy ___ (Ky. 1989)
EQUAL, EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY
Guidelines for Equal Educational Opportunity (Adopted
October 3, 1984):
Equal educational opportunity is the right of every
Connecticut child to be provided with the educational
experiences necessary to ensure that his or her
intellectual ability and special talents are developed
to the fullest.
While equal educational opportunity is a dynamic
concept, certain elements emerge as critically
important to schools and students. Access to
educational opportunities, staff and material
resources, program offerings, assessment of
student outcomes, remedial education and
funding are major elements of equal educational
opportunity, elements that must interact in
systematic ways. In a broad sense, progress in
achieving equal educational opportunity can be
measured by the reduction of inter-district,
intra-district and inter-pupil disparities in
educational opportunities as defined by these
six elements. Equity in this sense does not
mean an equal distribution of resources;
rather, it implies that those who need more
must receive more.
No group of students will demonstrate systematically
different achievement based upon the differences --
such as residence or race or sex -- that its members
brought with them when they entered school.
To that end, the concept of access must encompass the
importance of providing a broad range of services to
meet a broad range of needs. Access is an issue that
goes beyond local school district boundaries to the region
and, in some instances, the state as a whole.
State Board of Education Policy Statement on Equal Educational
Opportunity (May 7, 1986)‘:
"Equal educational opportunity" means student access to
a level and quality of programs and experiences which
provide each child with the means to achieve a commonly
defined standard of an educated citizen.
This goal will require resource allocations based upon
individual student needs and sufficient resources to
provide each child with opportunities for developing
his or her intellectual abilities and special talents
to the fullest.
Evidence of equal educational opportunity is the
participation of each student in programs appropriate
to his or her needs and the achievement by each of the
state’s student sub-populations (as defined by such
factors as wealth, race, sex or residence) of
educational outcomes at least equal to that of the
state’s student population as a whole....
Governor's Commission Report (December, 1990):
"A 'Quality and Integrated Education’ should expose
students to an integrated student body and faculty and
a curriculum that reflects the heritage of many
cultures. It should also provide all students with
equal opportunities to learn and to achieve equal
educational outcomes."
IMPORTANCE OF INTEGRATION
State Board of Education Policy Statement, May 7, 1986:
"The State Board supports racial integration in
Connecticut’s schools and also recognizes the benefits
of residential and economic integration in our state,
as important to the quality of education and personal
growth for all students in Connecticut."
1 1986 Statement repeats much of 1984 "Guidelines."
Local Policies on Racial Isolation in the Public Schools,
September 1967.
Quality education is affected in communities where
"there are no Negro children in the school or community
or where the white pupils are isolated."
"Isolation and lack of exposure to the mainstream of
American society make it especially difficult for these
children to achieve their full educational potential."