Letter to Judge Roth from Saxton RE: Emergency Motion of Defendants-Intervenors

    L E O  M. B U T Z E L  

1 0 7 4 - 1 9 6 1T H O M A S  G .  L O N G  
R O C K  Vi/E L L  T .  G U S T  
A .  H I L L I A R D  W I L L I A M S  
V I C T O R  W. K L E I N  
T.  G O R D O N  S C  U P  H O L M  
A L F R E D  W.  M A S S N I C K  
M A R T I N  L .  B U T Z E L  
P H I L I P  T. V A N  Z l t . E ,  I I  
A D D I S O N  D .  C O N N O R  
G E O R G E  E .  B R A N D ,  J R .  
E L E A N O R  S .  P A Y N E  
J A M E S  D.  R I T C H I E  
J O H N  J .  K U H N  
W I L L I A M  M . S A X T O N  
H A R O L D  A . R U E M E N A P P  
L E S L I E  W. F L E M I N G  
W I L L I A M  L .  P O W E R S  
R O B E R T  J .  B A T T I S T A  
J O H N  P.  W I L  L I A M S  
R O B E R T  M .  K L E I N  
X H A T E R  O R H A N  
LAW  R E N C E R . V A N  T I L  
J O H N  B . W E A V E R  
G E O R G E  E . W A R D  
G E O R G E  H.  Z I N N ,  J R .
J O H N  H .  D U D L E Y .  J R .  
R O B E R T  M . V E R C R U Y S S E  
R I C H A R D  E .  R A S S E L  
R E U B E N  M . WA T E R M A N ,  J R .  
J O N  H . W.  C L A R  K 
G E O R G E  J .  L U B E R D A  
E D W A R D  M.  K R O N K  
C H E S T E R  E.  K A S 1 B O R S K I ,  J R .

B U T Z E L ,  L O N G ,  G U S T ,  K L E I N  S> V A N  Z I L E

1 8 8 1  F I R S T  N A T I O N A L  B U I L D I N G  

DE T RO IT ,  M I C H I G A N  4 8 2 2 6

(3 13 > 963-8142

August  8, 1972

F R A N K  D.  E A M  A N

1 8 7 7 - 1 9 6  2

F R E D  J .  K E N N E D Y  

1 6 9 1 - 1 9 6 9

D A V I D  W .  K E N D A L L  

O F  C O U N S E L

H onorab le  Stephen J. Roth 
United States D is t r i c t  Court  
802 F e d e r a l  Bui lding 
D etro i t ,  M ich igan  48226

R e :  B r a d le y  et a l  v M i l l iken  et al
C iv i l  A c t i o n  No. 35257__________

D ear  Judge Roth:

E n c l o s e d  herew ith  f o r  f i l ing p lease  find " E m e r g e n c y  M ot ion"  of  D e fe n d an ts - 
In tervenors  A l le n  P a r k  Pu b l i c  S ch oo ls ,  et al, C r o s s e  Po in te  P u b l i c  S choo ls ,  
Southfie ld  P u b l ic  S choo ls  and S ch oo l  D is t r i c t  of  the City o f  R o y a l  Oak.

C o n c u r r e n c e  of c o u n se l  of  r e c o r d  has been  sought  and r e sp o n d e d  to as f o l l o w s

Counse l  f o r  State Defendants W i l l i a m  G. M i l l iken  et al,
D etro i t  F e d e r a t i o n  of  T e a c h e r s  and K e r r y  G reen  et al  
c o n c u r .

C ou nse l  f o r  D e tro i t  Pu b l ic  Schoo ls  take no pos i t ion .

Cou nse l  f o r  D en ise  M agdow sk i ,  et al ,  does  not c o n cu r .

C o u n s e l  f o r  P la int i f f s ,  W i l l i a m  E. Caldwel l ,  has a d v ise d  A s s i s ta n t  
A t to r n e y  G e n e r a l  Eugene  K r a s i c k y  that P la int i f fs  would  have no 
ob je c t ion  to extending the t ime f o r  a p e r io d  of ten (10) days  after  
the o r a l  argu m en t  b e f o r e  the Court  of A p p ea ls  f o r  the Sixth C ircu it .



4
H onorab le  Stephen J. Roth 
August  8, 1972 
P a ge  Tw o

Inasmuch as the o r a l  a rgu m e n t  b e f o r e  the Sixth C ir cu i t  Court  of  Ap p ea ls  is 
August  24, 1972, and ten (10) days  a f ter  such  date would  be Sunday, Septem be  
1972, and the M onday therea fter  being a hol iday,  L a b o r  Day, Cou nse l  f o r  
D e fe n d a n ts - In te r v e n o r s  have reques ted  an ex tens ion  f o r  f i l ing  o b je c t io n s ,  
m o d i f i c a t io n s  and a l ternat ives  to the r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s  of  the d e se g r e g a t io n  
P a n e l  and State Superintendent of  Pu b l i c  Instruct ion until Tuesday ,  S ep tem b er
1972.

S i ” " ' " ' ' ' 1 ”

W il l ia m  M. Saxton
4 4 / l j d
e n d

c c :  A l l  C ou nse l  of  R e c o r d
F r e d e r i c k  W. Johnson,  C lerk  

of the Court