Motion of Relief from Judgment
Public Court Documents
June 11, 1984

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bozeman v. Lambert and Wilder v. Lambert Court Documents. Motion of Relief from Judgment, 1984. 59442427-ed92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ede822e8-a5db-4673-947e-3f6d97068c9b/motion-of-relief-from-judgment. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
vs. EAL0N M. IAMBERT, et &1., Responclents. IN THE UNITED STATES .DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDI,E DISTRICT, OF AI,ABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MAGGIE S. BoZEMAN, Petitioner, MOTION FOR RE],IEF FROM JUDGMENT Respontlents move this Honorable Court to vaeate antl set asicle the final judgment entered in this eause on Aprll 15, 1984 and to clismiss the Petition against the respontlents in that it now appears that this Court lackecl juristliction to enter saitl f inal judgment. As grountls, respondents show as follows: 1. This motion is matle pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of C1vil Proceclure, specifically 50(b)(t;' Go(b) (4), 50(b) (r) anct 50(b) (5). 2. This is a Habeas Corpus proceecling pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 52241 et. seq. 3. An application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus must a11ege the name of the applicant's custodian. 28 U.S.C. $ 2242. The writ or the orcler to show eause must be dlrectetl crvlr ACtIoN N0. 8r-H-579-N to the petltloner's custodj.an. 2nU.S.C. $2241. The writ may not issue unless the petitioner is in custody. 28 U.S.C. $zzU . 4. In this case, the petitioner mistakenly names as respondents Ealon trambert, Jack Lufkin, John Porter, and Tecl Butler. Mr. Butler is a parole officer; the other three are the members of the Boartl of Pardons antl Paroles. 5. A prisoner of the State of Alabama, although on parole, renains ln the 1ega1 eustody of the warden of the prison fron whieh he is parolecl until the expiration of the term of his sentence. $15-22-26 of the Cotte of Alabama, 1g'15. 6. Neither the warden of the pri.son nor any sheriff nor any police ehief was ever namecl as respondent nor servetl with proeess in thls actlon. Neither did the proper eustotlian enter an appearance in this cause. 7. lfhere the petitioner's custodian ls not nametl or servetl with process and cloes not appear to tlefentl, the court is without jurisdiction to enter an ortler granting the urit of habeas eorpus. 8. A brief in support of this motion will be filed vith this court tomorrow. trHEREFORE, reeponflents move thle Honorable Court to vacate ancl set aslde the Judguent grantlng the vrlt of habeas corpus; ancl to tllenlss the petltlon baeetl upon the p).eadlnge; or to dlrect the petltloner to amentl the appllcatlon or otherwlse obtaln eervlce upon the custotll.an; or for such other rellef as le proper ancl Just. Respectfully eubnlttetl thla E day of June, I984. DISTRICT A[TORNEY IEY RESPONDENTS ( A[T FOR , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this l& ary of June, 1984, Bervetl a copy of the foregoing on the attorneys for the Petitioner by placing sane in the United States mall, poetage prepaltl and atltlressetl as follows: Vanzetta Penn Durant Attorney at l,aw 659 Ua*ha Street Montgomery, AL 36104 Iani Guinier Attorney at I,aw 99 Hudson Street 15th I'loor New York, NY '1001, ADDRESS OF COUNSEI: e/o Attorney General's Annex 569 South lawrence Street Montgom€ry, Alabama 55104 (zos) ltl-alst 4