Appeals Court Upholds Ruling to Outlaw Urban Renewal Bias
Press Release
September 26, 1964

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 1. Appeals Court Upholds Ruling to Outlaw Urban Renewal Bias, 1964. a0d5634e-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f093cc6f-6dea-430f-8288-5833ceb8748f/appeals-court-upholds-ruling-to-outlaw-urban-renewal-bias. Accessed October 08, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 JUdson 6-8397 NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund PRESS RELEASE President Dr. Allan Knight Chalmers Director-Counsel FOR RELEASE Jack Greenberg Saturday Associate Counsel September 26, 1964 Constance Baker Motley APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS RULING TO OUTLAW URBAN RENEWAL BIAS CINCINNATI---The U.S. Court of Appeals this week ruled that a Nashville motel must accept Negroes. The case has direct implications for all Urban Renewal programs, built before 1962, which exclude Negroes. Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund won this action. The Holiday Inn Motel, which refused Negroes in Nashville, Tenn., was built on land cleared, in part (two thirds) with federal funds, as part of Nashville's urban renewal program. Acting under Tennessee laws, the Nashville Housing Authority "condemned or purchased the 72 acres of land needed for the project" (the Capital Hill Redevelopment Project). They then “relocated 301 families and 196 individuals," the Court of Appeals pointed out. Of the families moved out, 288 were Negroes as were 180 of the individuals moved. Subsequently Holiday Inns of America, Inc. purchased its property. The Court fOr Une pointed out that the Motel was conceived by the Capital Hill Redevelopment Project, "its creation was made possible by the execution of the project, and its existence is now governed to a great degree by the project's predetermined design and controls." The judicial order comes as a complement to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which does not specifically cover housing among its provisions, although it does cover motels. The court waited before deciding this case to see whether the Motel would voluntarily comply after Congress passed the new rights legislation. The suit was filed by Dr. Vasco A. Smith, Jr. a Negro dentist from Memphis who was refused a room on December 4, 1962, Jesse DeVore, Jr.. Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 Se Appeals Court Upholds Ruling September 26, 1964 To Outlaw Urban Renewal Bias -.2 - Jack Greenberg, director-counsel of the Fund, said that "the implications of the decision are vast for all the urban renewal projects constructed before President Kennedy's 1962 executive order banning racial discrimination in federally supported housing," "This decision also makes specific judicial relief available in instances of discrimination by urban renewal projects built since the Presidential order." "It will affect rental housing, homes for sale, commercial property, and every other facility which has been built with urban renewal aid," the Legal Defense Fund's chief counsel said. The Sixth Circuit decision, a unanimous three-judge ruling, went to great lengths in detailing the extent of federal and state participation in, and financial support of, the urban renewal project, The Motel was built on land acquired from the Nashville Housing Authority in 1958 and 1959. The Authority had conceived the project in 1952, and condemned the redevelopment area, which at the time was 90% owned or occupied by Negroes. Joining Mr. Greenberg on the case were Fund cooperating attorneys Avon N. Williams and Z, Alexander Looby of Nashville, and A.W, Willis of Memphis; in addition, Constance Baker Motley and Frank H. Heffron of the Fund's New York City headquarters. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND. -3- September 26, 1964 Add 3 NE SEGREGATIONISTS U.S. DISTRICP JUDGE First i Rights Act JACKSONVILLE---Seventren restaurants and motels were ordered to accept Negze patrois in an order signed by U.S. District Judge Bryan V. Simpson here this week, three months of intensive work by at ‘oined Holsiéed “toss” Manucy, staunch segregationist and th2 Ancient City Gun Club, from interfering with the business establishments or Negroes seeking service. Most of the res ats involved im the.court Section had voluntarily complied with the Public Accommodations section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Legal Defense Fund attorneys sought court action when pressure and threats from segregationists in St. Augustine, however, forced them to re-segregate their facilities. Judge Simpson further ruled that the Legal Defense Fund attorneys would normally be entitled to an attorney's fee of $7,000 under the Civil Rights Act. However, since this was a test case, he exercised his discretion and did not award the fee at the present time, But the judge clearly implied that fees would be granted in future cases of this sort. Earlier in the summer, Judge Simpson awarded fees to Legal Defense Fund lawyers when holding one restaurant which was bound by the injunction and a deputized citizen in contempt for failing to comply with the court order. In addition, Judge Simpson entered an order requiring the Ancient City Gun Club--the staunchest foes of integration in St, Augustine--to divulge the names and addresses of all of its members within 15 days. Six other Fund cases pending in St. Augustine are expected to be settled quickly. Following the permanent injunctions, two more motels voluntarily agreed to desegregate, and the other establishments will most likely follww suit. NAACP Legal Defense Fund lawyers Leroy D, Clark, of New York, and cooperating attorneys Earl M, Johnson o&€-Tackes:-tlle and Tobias Simon of Miami handled the St. Augustine matter. ¥