Appeals Court Upholds Ruling to Outlaw Urban Renewal Bias
Press Release
September 26, 1964
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 1. Appeals Court Upholds Ruling to Outlaw Urban Renewal Bias, 1964. a0d5634e-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f093cc6f-6dea-430f-8288-5833ceb8748f/appeals-court-upholds-ruling-to-outlaw-urban-renewal-bias. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle
New York, N.Y. 10019
JUdson 6-8397
NAACP
Legal Defense and Educational Fund
PRESS RELEASE
President
Dr. Allan Knight Chalmers
Director-Counsel FOR RELEASE
Jack Greenberg Saturday
Associate Counsel September 26, 1964
Constance Baker Motley
APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS RULING
TO OUTLAW URBAN RENEWAL BIAS
CINCINNATI---The U.S. Court of Appeals this week ruled that a
Nashville motel must accept Negroes.
The case has direct implications for all Urban Renewal
programs, built before 1962, which exclude Negroes.
Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund won this action.
The Holiday Inn Motel, which refused Negroes in Nashville,
Tenn., was built on land cleared, in part (two thirds) with
federal funds, as part of Nashville's urban renewal program.
Acting under Tennessee laws, the Nashville Housing
Authority "condemned or purchased the 72 acres of land needed
for the project" (the Capital Hill Redevelopment Project).
They then “relocated 301 families and 196 individuals,"
the Court of Appeals pointed out.
Of the families moved out, 288 were Negroes as were 180 of
the individuals moved. Subsequently Holiday Inns of America,
Inc. purchased its property.
The Court fOr Une pointed out that the Motel was conceived
by the Capital Hill Redevelopment Project, "its creation was
made possible by the execution of the project, and its existence
is now governed to a great degree by the project's predetermined
design and controls."
The judicial order comes as a complement to the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, which does not specifically cover housing among its
provisions, although it does cover motels.
The court waited before deciding this case to see whether
the Motel would voluntarily comply after Congress passed the new
rights legislation.
The suit was filed by Dr. Vasco A. Smith, Jr. a Negro dentist
from Memphis who was refused a room on December 4, 1962,
Jesse DeVore, Jr.. Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 Se
Appeals Court Upholds Ruling September 26, 1964
To Outlaw Urban Renewal Bias -.2 -
Jack Greenberg, director-counsel of the Fund, said that
"the implications of the decision are vast for all the urban
renewal projects constructed before President Kennedy's 1962
executive order banning racial discrimination in federally
supported housing,"
"This decision also makes specific judicial relief available
in instances of discrimination by urban renewal projects built
since the Presidential order."
"It will affect rental housing, homes for sale, commercial
property, and every other facility which has been built with
urban renewal aid," the Legal Defense Fund's chief counsel said.
The Sixth Circuit decision, a unanimous three-judge ruling,
went to great lengths in detailing the extent of federal and
state participation in, and financial support of, the urban
renewal project,
The Motel was built on land acquired from the Nashville
Housing Authority in 1958 and 1959. The Authority had conceived
the project in 1952, and condemned the redevelopment area, which
at the time was 90% owned or occupied by Negroes.
Joining Mr. Greenberg on the case were Fund cooperating
attorneys Avon N. Williams and Z, Alexander Looby of Nashville,
and A.W, Willis of Memphis; in addition, Constance Baker Motley
and Frank H. Heffron of the Fund's New York City headquarters.
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND. -3- September 26, 1964
Add 3
NE SEGREGATIONISTS
U.S. DISTRICP JUDGE
First i Rights Act
JACKSONVILLE---Seventren restaurants and motels were ordered to
accept Negze patrois in an order signed by U.S. District Judge
Bryan V. Simpson here this week,
three months of intensive work
by at
‘oined Holsiéed “toss” Manucy, staunch
segregationist and th2 Ancient City Gun Club, from interfering
with the business establishments or Negroes seeking service.
Most of the res ats involved im the.court Section had
voluntarily complied with the Public Accommodations section of
the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Legal Defense Fund attorneys sought
court action when pressure and threats from segregationists in
St. Augustine, however, forced them to re-segregate their
facilities.
Judge Simpson further ruled that the Legal Defense Fund
attorneys would normally be entitled to an attorney's fee of
$7,000 under the Civil Rights Act. However, since this was a
test case, he exercised his discretion and did not award the fee
at the present time,
But the judge clearly implied that fees would be granted in
future cases of this sort. Earlier in the summer, Judge Simpson
awarded fees to Legal Defense Fund lawyers when holding one
restaurant which was bound by the injunction and a deputized
citizen in contempt for failing to comply with the court order.
In addition, Judge Simpson entered an order requiring the
Ancient City Gun Club--the staunchest foes of integration in
St, Augustine--to divulge the names and addresses of all of its
members within 15 days.
Six other Fund cases pending in St. Augustine are expected
to be settled quickly. Following the permanent injunctions,
two more motels voluntarily agreed to desegregate, and the other
establishments will most likely follww suit.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund lawyers Leroy D, Clark, of New York,
and cooperating attorneys Earl M, Johnson o&€-Tackes:-tlle and
Tobias Simon of Miami handled the St. Augustine matter.
¥