Thurgood Marshall today expressed the concern of his organization…
Press Release
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Thurgood Marshall today expressed the concern of his organization…, 755b4275-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f0bf1e57-fafb-403d-aa11-0f085f26de17/thurgood-marshall-today-expressed-the-concern-of-his-organization. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE @ r )
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE « NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS oa THURGOOD MARSHALL
President Director-Counsel
NEW YORK, Dec. 15,--Thurgood Marshall today expressed the consern
of his organization over a preliminary ruling of the New York State
Commission Against Discrimination in the case of American Jewish
Congress ve. Arabian American 011 Company.
This was an action instituted by the AJC contending that the
Arabian American 0il1 Co. committed an unlawful discriminatory practice
in questioning applicants for employment in New York State about relig~
ion and in refusing to employ Jewish personnel, The Investigating
Commissioner, Elmer A. Carter, held on Novenber 10, 1958, that Aramco
had not violated the lew, ruling that religion was a “bonafide occupa-
tional qualification" for applicants whose employment would require an
entry visa to Saudi Arabia, a nation which bars Jews from its territory
Mr. Marshall, Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, in a letter to Charles Abrams, Chairman of the Com-
mission, sought permission for a member of his staff to appear at a
rehearing of the case by the Chairman to argue for reversal of the
earlier decision. His letter said in part:
"Tt seems perilous to us to promulgate a rule of law which
excuses blatant and admitted discriminatory practices on the
plea that business dealings with third persons require such
policies. Claims by firms that they practice racial or religious
discrimination only to satisfy the demands of their customers
or those with whom they do business, are not uncommon occurrences.
Even when well founded, these claims have not been recognized
as a legal excuse for discrimination. We feel that the purposes
of New York's law against discrimination would not be served by
making an exception in this case."
a 30 =