Thurgood Marshall today expressed the concern of his organization…
Press Release

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Thurgood Marshall today expressed the concern of his organization…, 755b4275-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f0bf1e57-fafb-403d-aa11-0f085f26de17/thurgood-marshall-today-expressed-the-concern-of-his-organization. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE @ r ) NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE « NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397 DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS oa THURGOOD MARSHALL President Director-Counsel NEW YORK, Dec. 15,--Thurgood Marshall today expressed the consern of his organization over a preliminary ruling of the New York State Commission Against Discrimination in the case of American Jewish Congress ve. Arabian American 011 Company. This was an action instituted by the AJC contending that the Arabian American 0il1 Co. committed an unlawful discriminatory practice in questioning applicants for employment in New York State about relig~ ion and in refusing to employ Jewish personnel, The Investigating Commissioner, Elmer A. Carter, held on Novenber 10, 1958, that Aramco had not violated the lew, ruling that religion was a “bonafide occupa- tional qualification" for applicants whose employment would require an entry visa to Saudi Arabia, a nation which bars Jews from its territory Mr. Marshall, Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, in a letter to Charles Abrams, Chairman of the Com- mission, sought permission for a member of his staff to appear at a rehearing of the case by the Chairman to argue for reversal of the earlier decision. His letter said in part: "Tt seems perilous to us to promulgate a rule of law which excuses blatant and admitted discriminatory practices on the plea that business dealings with third persons require such policies. Claims by firms that they practice racial or religious discrimination only to satisfy the demands of their customers or those with whom they do business, are not uncommon occurrences. Even when well founded, these claims have not been recognized as a legal excuse for discrimination. We feel that the purposes of New York's law against discrimination would not be served by making an exception in this case." a 30 =