Memo RE: Alternate Remedial Plan
Public Court Documents
March 17, 1999

7 pages
Cite this item
-
Connecticut, Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Memo RE: Alternate Remedial Plan, 1999. b62b1bb8-a146-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f13efaab-1a01-41e0-808a-91dd9da46336/memo-re-alternate-remedial-plan. Accessed September 18, 2025.
Copied!
(EDK MEMORANDUM TO: Sheff Legal Team FROM: Dennis Parker RE: Documents for 3/18/99 Meeting DATE: March 17, 1999 In preparation for our upcoming meeting, attached is an alternate remedial plan, drawn up by Chris Hanson and some language intended to facilitate discussion about a submission to the legislature. Remember, the lawyers’ meeting will begin at 5:00pm on Thursday, March 18, one hour before the plaintiffs’ meeting. MEMORANDUM] TO; Dennis Parker FROM: Chris Hansen RE: Sheff remedy DATE: March 3, 1999 | have been thinking about the problems with the remedy that Len has been discussing. | have an idea about a possible alternative. I'm not sure | like this alternative, but | thought | should present it to you to see what you thought. It is based on the principle that we don’t know what the right remedy is or how to get to that goal. The order would set certain goals and then have incentives, penalties, and timetables for those goals. | would see it something like this: 1. Each district in the region shall move toward the overall regional percentage of Hispanic and African American students (each measured separately). 2. Each district in the region shall move toward the overall regional percentage of Hispanic and African American faculty (each measured separately). 3. Each district in the region shall move toward the overall regional percentage of Hispanic and African American staff (each measured separately). 4. Each district in the region shall move toward the overall regional percentage of children eligible for receiving free and/or reduced lunch. 5. In any year in which the district moves toward the goals set in paragraphs 1-3 by at least 1%, the district shall receive an increase of state aid of 0.5% over the base (or beginning) year for each goal met. This aid shall be cumulative. Thus, if a district improves two years in a row, it shall receive an increase of 1% of state aid provided in 1 the base year. 6. In order to receive the aid identified in paragraph 4, the district must show (or the state must determine): (a) that the percentage change was due primarily to actions of the district and not to ordinary demographic changes. (b) the index of dissimilarity for the district has not worsened by more than 2 points. 7. Each district in the region with scores on the test that are less than the mean for the region as a whole shall improve its average score by at least one percent per year. 8. [SOME NON-TEST RELATED OUTPUT MEASURES SHALL BE MET] 9. In any year in which the district moves toward the goals set in paragraphs 7-8 by at least 1%, the district shall receive an increase of state aid of 0.5% over the base (or beginning) year for each goal met. This aid shall be cumulative. Thus, if a district improves two years in a row, it shall receive an increase of 1% of state aid provided in the base year. 10. The state shall make available upto $ million for technical assistance to districts in meeting the goals outlined above. The state shall also publish within 180 days of the date of this order a list of at least five methods by which districts can meet each of the goals outlined above. 11. In any year in which fewer than 1/2 of all of the goals are met, the state shall [COME UP WITH SOME PENALTY ON STATE] 12. The state shall fund two studies by qualified social scientists to evaluate and publish the results of the evaluation of the actions taken by the state to achieve the goals outlined in this order. In my mind, there are two big flaws in this. First, | haven't come up with enough either incentives or penalties to put compliance responsibility firmly on the state rather than the districts. Second, the principal incentives ($) are too dependent on legislative funding and the numbers I've chosen too arbitrary.. On the other hand, it leaves the method of compliance up to the state and the regions, which | think is a good thing. Let me know if you think this is worth circulating to our co-counsel. DRAFT In order to assure orderly and steady progress toward the reduction of racial and ethnic isolation, the legislature should pass legislation that: 1) Requires all school in the region to meet a desegregation standard of student assignment defined as plus or minus a particular number of percentage points. The standard may be tailored to factors such as the type of school on the location of the school in the metropolitan area. Whatever the standard, it must be effective, that is, it must promise to achieve a meaningful reduction of racial and ethnic isolation region-wide; 2) Requires all schools in the region to have proportions of African American and Latino staff which meet a statistical standard keyed to the proportions of African American and Latino staff in the public schools of the region. Whatever the standard, it must be effective, that is, it must be a standard that clearly will produce integrated staffing for the region’s schools; 3) Sets an implementation timetable that requires that goals for reduction of racial and ethnic isolation be achieved within a reasonable, set period of years; 4) Assures that financing to support the goals be provided sufficient to implement the goals while assuring economic equity; 5) Requires the creation of specific procedures for monitoring the implementation of goals and timetables, reporting findings and recommending measures to assure effectiveness; and 6) Establishes procedures and/or sanctions to address failure to reduce racial and ethnic isolation. FAX COVER SHEET TO: John Brittain 860/570-5242 Sandy DelValle 516/496-7934 Juan Figueroa 212/431-4276 Chris Hansen 212/549-2651 Wes Horton 860/728-0401 Marianne Engelman Lado 212/802-5968 Willy Rodriguez 860/541-5050 Martha Stone 860/570-5256 Phil Teleger 860/728-0287 Elizabeth Sheff 860/527-3305 FROM: Dennis Parker RE: Documents for 3/18/99 Meeting DATE: March 17, 1999 NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET) 3 IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THE NUMBER OF PAGES INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AT 212\219-1900. on REPORT xx AS OF MAR 17 ’99 di. sind COMMAND #124 DATE TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC = PGS STATUS 3/17 : 860 570 5242 EC--S 2 005 OK ; 15164967934 G3--S > 005 2124314276 EC--S id 005 2127304652 EC--S i 005 8607280401 EC--S > 005 212 802 5968 860 570 5256 860 728 0287 527 3305 203 541 5050 FAX COVER SHEET John Brittain 860/570-5242 Sandy DelValle 516/496-7934 Juan Figueroa 212/431-4276 Chris Hansen 212/549-2651 Wes Horton 860/728-0401 Marianne Engelman Lado 212/802-5968 Willy Rodriguez 860/541-5050 Martha Stone 860/570-5256 Phil Teleger 860/728-0287 Elizabeth Sheff 860/527-3305 Dennis Parker Documents for 3/18/99 Meeting March 17, 1999 NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET) 5 IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THE NUMBER OF PAGES INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE NOTIFY US|IMMEDIATELY AT 212\219-1900. * Tyr rmaTrON REPORT #3 AS OF MAR 5 '99 R PAGE. 1 COMMAND #056 DATE. TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PCS STATUS 001 3/05 19:15 15164267834 G3-~-8 ©5756 010 OK FAX COVER SHEET John Brittain 860/570-5242 Sandy DelValle 516/496-7934 Juan Figueroa 212/431-4276 Chris Hansen 212/549-2651 Wes Horton 860/728-0401 Mariagne Engelman Lado 212/802-5968 Willy Rodriguez 860/541-5050 Martha Stone 860/570-5256 Phil Teleger 860/728-0287 Elizabeth Sheff 860/527-3305 Dennis Parker Agenda for the March 8, 1999 Meeting March 3, 1999 NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET) 10 IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THE NUMBER O : F PAGES INDIC PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AT 212\219.1909, ATED ABOVE,