Estes v. Dallas NAACP Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Public Court Documents
August 11, 1978

Cite this item

Estes v. Dallas NAACP Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- Education
Matter
- Estes v. Dallas NAACP
Case
- Estes v. Dallas NAACP
U.S. state
- Texas
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 4b2ddc29-b19a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. North Carolina General Assembly State Representative Districts, 1977. 001f96b2-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2aa51bf6-edf7-445f-add4-a23b74224133/north-carolina-general-assembly-state-representative-districts. Accessed May 03, 2025.

Copied!

    @9

District #
1

Counties

# of Reg.

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY
STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICTS

Estimate of

0

Total Bop. % Non—White 6 Poor % White

Voters

% Black

Exhibit II-A

0

Voters 6 Indian 6 Other

 

Camden 2
Chowan

Currituck

Dare

Pasquotank

Tyrrell

Washington

Beaufort 1
Hyde

Craven 3
Jones

Lenoir

Pamlico

_%érteret 3

Onslow

Bertie 2
Gates
Hartford

.Northampton

Halifax 2
Martin

Edgecombe 4
Nash
Wilson

Greene -_.2
Pitt '

Wayne 2

74,856 40.2 20 75.

41,551 34.4 17.8 79.

137,004 32.3 19.9 74.

134,729 15.0 14.6 89.

76,590 56.7 18.7 52.
78,614 48.0 26.4 67.
168,949 39.8 ' 22.0 73.

88,867 36.8 24.5 77.

85,408 33.5 20.2 78.

4

24.

20.

25.

10.

47.

32.

27.

21.

21.

5 _0.0

4

 

1

Page 2 -- North Carolina General Assembly State Representative Districts
I Estimate of ‘

District # Counties # of Rep. Total Pop. % Non-White % Poor % White Voters Black Voters 8 Indian 6 Other
10 .Duplin 1 38,015 34.3 27.5 79.6 20.4 0.0
11 Brunswick 1 42,372 36.4 ‘ 23.5 74.6 25.4 0.0

Pender
12 New Hanover 2 82,996 22.9 14.1 84.1, 15.8 0.1
13 Caswell 3 126,232 44.2 20.5 65.8 33.8 0.4
Granville
Person
Vance
Warren
14 Franklin 2 88,557 27.5 24.8 82.8 17.1 0.1
Johnston _
15 Wake 6 228,453 22.6 10.1 85.9 14.1 0.0
16 Durham 3 132,681 32.9 11.9 76.1 23.7 0.2
17 Chatham 2 87,261 22.4 11.3 83.9 16.1 0.0
Orange t
18 Harnett 2 80,134 ' 24.4 18.0 85.1 14.8 0.1
Lee
19 Bladen 3 118,368 35.2 i 26.6 74.9 23.7 1.4
_Columbus
Sampson
20 Cumberland S 212,042 26.5 a 13.9 78.6 21.4 0.0
21 IHoke .3 128,207 52.9 24.6 V 50.3 25.4 24.3
_Robeson 9'
Scotland
22 Alamance 4 168,764 19.0 10.2 87.6 21.3 0.0
Rockingham
23 Guilford 7 288,590 22.5 8.9 84.4 15.6 0.0

Exhibit II-B

 

 

 

Page 3 -- North Carolina General AsSembly State Representative Districts

 

District # Counties
24 Randolph
25 Moore
26 Anson
Montgomery

27 Richmond

28 Allegheny
Ashe
Stokes
Surry
Watauga

29 Forsyth

30 ’Davidson
Davie

31 Rowan

32 Stanly

33 .Cabarrus

, Union

34 Caldwell
Wilkes
Yadkin

35 Alexander
Iredell

36 ’Mecklenburg

37 Catawba

38 Gaston

Lincoln

Estimate of

 

 

 

# of Rep. Total Pop. 4 Non-White % Poor % White Voters ' Black Voters Indian 8 Other
2-. 76,358 7.4 9.9 95.6 4.4 0.0
1 39,048 . 25.1 . 19.0 86.1 13.9 0.0

_1 42,755 36.8 22.0 79.0 21.0 0.0
1 39,889 29.7 ' 19.9 74.1 25.8 0.0
3 126,306 4.4 19.4 96.5 3.5 0.0
5 214,348 22.5 10.7 79.9 20.0 0.1
3 114,482 10.3 11.0 91.6 8.3 0.0
2 90,035 16.1 , 10.3 89.9 10.1 0.0
1 42,822 11.0 10.4 93.0 7.0 0.0
3 (129,343 17.4 . 10.4 89.3 10.7 0.0
3’ 130,822 5.7 15.9 95.5 4.5 0.0

' 2 91,663 '15.2 11.4 92.0 8.0 0.0
8 354,656 24.1 g 8.9 , ' 83.9 16.1 0.0
2 90,873 8.9 7.5 93.1 6.9 0.0
4 181,097 11.9 9.7 91.6 8.4 0.0

. . Exhibit II-D
Page 4 -- North Carolina General Assembly State Representative Districts

Estimate of
District # Counties 0 of Rep: 'Total Pop. % Non~White % Poor % White Voters % Black Voters 8 Indian 6 Other

 

 

39 Avery 2 86,466 5.3 15.4 96.5 3.5 0.0
'Burke ,
Mitchell

40 Cleveland 3 131,628 16.4 14.8 - 92.6 7.4 0.0
Polk
Rutherford

41 McDowell 1 43,277 4.2 19.6 96.9 3.1 0.0
Yancey

42 Henderson 1 42,804 4.7 21.0 97.1 2.9 0.0

43 Buncombe 4 - 164,769 8.7 13.4 93.7 6.3 0.0
Transylvania

LN
H

44 Haywood 2 87,167 ' 5.1 ’ 21.5 95.7 1.2
Uackson
Madison
Swain

45 Cherokee 1 43,860 2.8 26.3 98.6'- 0.9 0.5
Clay 4 .
Graham
Macon

”—1

,1 'Exhibit II—E

North Carolina General Assembly
State Representative Districts

 

1970 1977 Est. Present Estimated
Total Pop. Variance From Variance From
District Population Addition 1 Person, 1 Vote 1 Person, 1 Vote

1 74,856 10,273 -11.6. - .48
2 ,. 41,551 3,623 - 1.98 - .78
3 ‘137,004 10,148 + 7.88 +6.78
4 134,729 17,324 + 6 8 +10.38
5 76,590 444 - 9. 8 -16.18
6 78,614 1,678 - 7. 8 -12.68
7 168,949 9,797 - 8 - .88
8 88,867 5,960 + 4. 8 + 3.28
9 85,408 5,429 + .88 + 1.28
10 38,015 2,029 -10. 8 -12.98
11 42,372 11,914 + 1. 8 +18.18
12 82,996 13,923 - 2. 8 +5.48
13 126,232 4,048 - . 8 -5.58
14 88,557 5,503 - + 4.68 +2.68
15 228,453 44,005 -10.18 -1.28
16 132,681 10,463 + 4. 8 +3.88
17 87,261 11,966 +.3. 8 +7.98
18 80,134 8,966 — 5. 8 -3.18
19 118,368 10,551 - 6. 8 -6.58
20 212,042 18,875 + .18 + .48
21 128,207 13,923 + . 8 +3.08
22 168,764 6,045 — . 8 ~5.08
23 288,590 15,643 - 2. 8 -5.58
24 76,358 6,953 - 8. 8 -9.48
25 39,048 4,689 ~ 7. 8 -4.98
26 42,755 489 + .98 -6.08
27 39,889 1,928 - 5. 8 -9.18
28 126,306 15,954 - . 8 +3.28
29 214,348 13,315 + 1. 8 -1.08
30 114,482 9,096 -10. 8 -10.48
31 90,035 2,686 + 6. 8 +.88
32 42,822 2,027 + 1.18 -2.48
33 129,343 13,220 + 1. 8 +3.48
34 130,822 11,594 + 2. 8 +3.38
35 91,663 8,505 + 8. 8 +9.08
36 354,656 22,494 + 4. 8 +2.68
37. 90,873 8,849 + 7.38 +8.58
38 181,097 11,829 + 6. 8 +4.98
39 86,466 5,455 + 2. 8 0.08
40 131,628 10,204 + 3. 8 +2.98
41 43,277 4,863 + 2. 8 +4.78
42 42,804 7,811 + 1. 8 +10.08
43 164,769 8,814 — 2.88 -5.68
44 87,167 8,814 + 2. 8 +4.48
45 43,860 5,000 + 3.6° +6.38

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Estes v. Dallas NAACP Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in