Alabama "Sit-In" Case Taken to U.S. Supreme Court

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 3e1f0106-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. Alabama "Sit-In" Case Taken to U.S. Supreme Court, 1962. 3e1f0106-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f4ac707a-220b-46e3-8756-5efc085cf7b6/alabama-sit-in-case-taken-to-us-supreme-court. Accessed December 04, 2025.

Copied!

    ‘PRESS RELEASE 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
TOCOLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEW YORK19,N.Y. © JUdson6-8397 

DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY 
President General Counsel Associate Counsel 

Ss 

January 31, 1962 

ALABAMA "SIT-IN" CASE TAKEN 
TO U. S. SUPREME COURT 

NEW YORK - The U. S. Supreme Court was petitioned today to review the 

cases of 10 Negro youths who conducted lunch counter demonstrations 

in Birmingham, Ala. in March 1960. 

In its petition for certiorari, NAACP Legal Defense and Educa- 

tional Fund attorneys asked the high Court to review a judgment of the 

Alabama Court of Appeals of May 30, 1961, which upheld the demonstra- 

tors’ convictions. 

The youths, on March 30, 1960, sat-in in groups of two's at five 

store lunch counters in Birmingham: Pizitz's, Loveman's, Newberry's, 

Kress's and Woolworth's. 

The "sit-iners" were asked to go to counters reserved for Negroes 

and when they refused, were arrested by city police. There was no 

disturbance at any of the demonstrations. 

The youths were convicted in Recorder's Court of the City of 

" and later sentenced to Birmingham for "trespassing after warning," 

thirty days hard labor and $100.00 fine by the Circuit Court of 

Jefferson County. 

The Defense Fund petition contends that the demonstrators were 

denied due process of law becauee a Birmingham segregation ordinance 

requires racial segregation of eating establishments, and thus " pre- 

sents a plain conflict with numerous prior decisions of the Supreme 

Court invalidating state efforts to require racial segregation." 

The Negro youths who are petitioners in the case, are James 

Gober, James A. Davis, Roy Hutchinson, Robert J. King, Robert Parker, 

William West, Rebert D. Sanders, Roosevelt Westmoreland, Jessie 

Walker, and Willie J. Willis, all of Birmingham. 



=e 

Today's petition for certiorari becomes the ninth "sit-in" case 

pending before the U. S. Supreme Court. Five of the cases are from 

Virginia, two from Maryland, and one from North Carolina. 

NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys representing the Negro youths 

are Arthur D. Shores, Peter A. Hall, Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Oscar 

W. Adams, Jr., and J. Richmond Pearson, all of Birmin » and Jack 

Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Leroy D. Clark, Michael Meltsner, 

and James M. Nabrit, III, all of New York City. 

er

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Alabama "Sit-In" Case Taken to U.S. Supreme Court

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in