Pegues v. Mississippi State Employment Service Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Public Court Documents
July 21, 1981

Cite this item

Pegues v. Mississippi State Employment Service Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Economic Justice
Topic
- Economic Justice
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- ecb682fb-c09a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 2. Supreme Court Hears Argument on Jury Exclusion of Negroes, 1964. 1ad79a7e-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e92b3c2b-bd84-41bc-ae07-1a33b0b7ff2c/supreme-court-hears-argument-on-jury-exclusion-of-negroes. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    10 Columbus Circle 
New York, } 10019 
JUdson 6-8397 

NAACP 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund 
PRESS RELEASE 
President 

Dr. Allan Knight Chalmers 
Director-Counsel 

Jack Greenberg 
Associate Counsel 
; Constance Baker Motley FOR RELEASE 

Tuesday = ie 
December 8, 1964 

SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENT 
ON JURY EXCLUSION OF NEGROES 

WASHINGTON---The U.S. Supreme Court was asked to strike down a 

practice utilized by numerous southern communities to systematically 

exclude Negro citizens from juries. 

Constance Baker Motley, associate counsel of the NAACP Legal 

Defense Fund, argued that the 1962 conviction of Robert Swain 

should be reversed. 

While a few Talladega County Negroes are included on the jury 

rolls, they have been consistently struck by prosecutors, Mrs. 

Motley stressed. 

The U.S. Civil Rights Commission's 1961 report indicates that 

this practice is widely used across the deep south. 

Robert Swain, the defendant, was sentenced to death for the 

alleged rape of a white woman. 

The civil rights lawyer pointed out that no Negro has served 

on a trial jury in Talladega County in either civil or criminal 

cases. 

This was Mrs. Motley's ninth appearance before the U.S. 

Supreme Court. Assisting her were Legal Defense Fund Director 

Counsel Jack Greenberg; James M. Nabrit III, Michael Meltsner and 

Frank Heffron of the Fund's New York City headquarters. 

Cooperating Attorneys Orzell Billingsley, Jr. and Peter Hall 

of Birmingham assisted on the case as did volunteer attorney, 

Henry M, di Suvero. 

=30= 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 BS

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Pegues v. Mississippi State Employment Service Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Impact area

Topic

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in