Letter from Tegeler to Court RE: Motion for Extension of Time and Newsclipping
Working File
April 30, 1992
6 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Letter from Tegeler to Court RE: Motion for Extension of Time and Newsclipping, 1992. cd51502d-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f7d0be21-364e-4d61-b385-a935710c39e8/letter-from-tegeler-to-court-re-motion-for-extension-of-time-and-newsclipping. Accessed November 02, 2025.
Copied!
FOUNDATION
April 30, 15892
Clerk of the Court
Superior Court
95 Washington Street
Hartford, CT 06106
RE: Sheff v. O'Neill, CVB9-D3509778S
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please forward the attached Motion to Judge Hammer, who has
responsibility for the above-captioned case.
Sincerely,
~~ Pais .
’ : ay si; { 7 ,
LP, ag rr pf - Le iii
/ / /, yd LA Fd ZT. Z AP C
Philip D. Tegeler
Attorney for Plaintiffs
PDT/dmt
Attachment
CC: “All Counsel
cut Civil Liberties Tnion Foundation
— = 35 a
Cv89-0360977S
MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiffs
Vv. 3 JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
: HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN
WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. : AT HARTFORD
Defendants APRIL 30, 1992
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
The Plaintiffs move for an extension of time of twenty-one (21)
days, to respond to Defendants’ First Request for Production, served
on March 31, 1992. The reason for this Motion is the need for further
legal and technical research regarding an appropriate response to
defendants’ request seeking all data, including computer data,
gathered by an expert witness retained by plaintiffs.
Defendants have been contacted and have no objection to the
granting of this Motion. This is the first Motion for Extension of
Time regarding Defendants’ First Request for Production.
For good cause shown,
GRANTED/DENIED.
DATE:
Respectfully Submitted,
Wp See’.
Philip D. Tegeler
Martha Stone
Connecticut Civil Liberties
Union Foundation
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ORDER
the foregoing Motion is hereby ordered
Hammer, J.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that one copy of the foregoing has been mailed
postage prepaid to John R. Whelan, Assistant Attorney General,
77
MacKenzie Hall, 110 Sherman Street, Hartford, CT 06105 this 27 day
of April, 1992
HY J ZAK
Philip D. Tegeler
WEDNESDAY
APRIL 29, 1992
Regional draw may be key to city school plans
By RICK GREEN
Courant Staff Writer
Faced with the costly prospect of adding
at least eight schools during the next 10
years, the Hartford Board of Education may
try to entice suburban students into the city
with magnet, or special-program, schools.
Building such schools could increase the
state’s contribution for construction costs,.
city and state officials said. ;
Now, the state reimburses about 70 per-
cent of the cost of a new school built in
Hartford. The city is considering as much as
$300 million in expansion and construction
projects, and may need additional help in
paying for them — or face shelving some of
the plans.
New schools that promote integration and
a regional approach to education could be
part of the answer.
“We need to look at it as a means of
regionalizing. It would serve us and it would
serve the towns surrounding us,” said school.
board President Carmen Rodriguez. If new
schools serve Hartford and suburban stu-
dents, she said, the state might pay more of
the costs.
Because school crowding in the city is so
bad that children are literally spilling out of
the classroom onto the playground, board of
education members said the trade-off with
the suburbs would have to be equal — for
each suburban student who comes to the
city, a city student would go to a suburban
school.
The specialized schools being discussed
include high schools that would emphasize
government and civics, commerce and in-
dustry or science and technology. Each
school would offer the basic core curriculum
but include opportunities for special study in
selected areas.
“I think it’s a great idea,” said board
member Candida Flores-Sepulveda. “I think
it will address a number of issues that we
have been working on for a long time.”
A board committee is preparing a pro-
posal that the city build or acquire at least
eight — and possibly 10 — new schools as the
school system grows from 26,000 to a pro-
jected 29,000 students during the next 10
years. The proposal includes three small,
specialized high schools; four middle
schools; and one to three elementary
schools. Some of the schools would be creat-
ed by converting existing schools.
Because the 31 existing schools need reno-
vations and additions, the total price tag for
the expansion could be as much as $300
Regional draw may be key
Continued from Connecticut Page
at that . .. as long as there were an
equal number of slots [for Hartford
students] being made available in
the suburban communities,” board
member Edward Carroll said of the
regional school idea. Carroll is chair-
man of the committee studying the
school system’s space needs.
Elizabeth Schmitt, a spokeswom--
an for the state Department of Edu-
cation, said the state has paid the full
construction costs of some so-called
magnet schools in recent years. That
is because they meet policy goals of
promoting racial integration and ef-
ficiency.
Most students in Hartford schools
are members of minority groups,
while many nearby suburban towns
have largely white student popula-
tions. City schools are the subject of
a lawsuit pending in Superior Court
in Hartford that says the segregated
schools are inferior and violate con-
stitutional guarantees of an equal
education.
In some suburban communities,
education leaders said they were in-
terested in the Hartford idea.
West Hartford school board Chair-
man John Lemega called it “a tre-
mendous idea.”
“The notion sounds interesting.
It’s got to be fleshed out,” said Le-
mega. He also said there are other
magnet school proposals, including
one at the University of Hartford.
“We are going to need radical alter-
natives in education,” he said.
Wethersfield Board of Education
Chairwoman Irene G. Roushon was
less enthusiastic, but said the key is
building a school with a good reputa-
tion. “If the parents don’t feel that
the education in that specific area is
superior, they are not going to buy
it,” she said. :
More Connecticut news on
Page A12.
million. The school board would like the
state to pay as much of the cost as possible so
city voters would be more inclined to ap-
prove the plans.
Board members are trying to determine
how many new schools are needed. More
discussion of what kinds of programs the
schools will offer will come after the board
submits its plans to the city council. City
voters could consider a school-building pro-
posal Election Day this year.
“I think we would be very open to looking
Please see Regional, Page D11
GGL
Connecticut
Civil Liberties Union
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Non-Profit Organization
U.S. Postage
PAID
Hartford, CT
Permit No. 3699
HARTFORD
Ron Se Lado Sd
NAACP Legal Defense. JFund
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY \V.10013
bolton diaablindsd