Letter from Tegeler to Court RE: Motion for Extension of Time and Newsclipping
Working File
April 30, 1992

6 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Letter from Tegeler to Court RE: Motion for Extension of Time and Newsclipping, 1992. cd51502d-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f7d0be21-364e-4d61-b385-a935710c39e8/letter-from-tegeler-to-court-re-motion-for-extension-of-time-and-newsclipping. Accessed July 29, 2025.
Copied!
FOUNDATION April 30, 15892 Clerk of the Court Superior Court 95 Washington Street Hartford, CT 06106 RE: Sheff v. O'Neill, CVB9-D3509778S Dear Sir or Madam, Please forward the attached Motion to Judge Hammer, who has responsibility for the above-captioned case. Sincerely, ~~ Pais . ’ : ay si; { 7 , LP, ag rr pf - Le iii / / /, yd LA Fd ZT. Z AP C Philip D. Tegeler Attorney for Plaintiffs PDT/dmt Attachment CC: “All Counsel cut Civil Liberties Tnion Foundation — = 35 a Cv89-0360977S MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiffs Vv. 3 JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF : HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. : AT HARTFORD Defendants APRIL 30, 1992 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION The Plaintiffs move for an extension of time of twenty-one (21) days, to respond to Defendants’ First Request for Production, served on March 31, 1992. The reason for this Motion is the need for further legal and technical research regarding an appropriate response to defendants’ request seeking all data, including computer data, gathered by an expert witness retained by plaintiffs. Defendants have been contacted and have no objection to the granting of this Motion. This is the first Motion for Extension of Time regarding Defendants’ First Request for Production. For good cause shown, GRANTED/DENIED. DATE: Respectfully Submitted, Wp See’. Philip D. Tegeler Martha Stone Connecticut Civil Liberties Union Foundation 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 Attorney for Plaintiffs ORDER the foregoing Motion is hereby ordered Hammer, J. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that one copy of the foregoing has been mailed postage prepaid to John R. Whelan, Assistant Attorney General, 77 MacKenzie Hall, 110 Sherman Street, Hartford, CT 06105 this 27 day of April, 1992 HY J ZAK Philip D. Tegeler WEDNESDAY APRIL 29, 1992 Regional draw may be key to city school plans By RICK GREEN Courant Staff Writer Faced with the costly prospect of adding at least eight schools during the next 10 years, the Hartford Board of Education may try to entice suburban students into the city with magnet, or special-program, schools. Building such schools could increase the state’s contribution for construction costs,. city and state officials said. ; Now, the state reimburses about 70 per- cent of the cost of a new school built in Hartford. The city is considering as much as $300 million in expansion and construction projects, and may need additional help in paying for them — or face shelving some of the plans. New schools that promote integration and a regional approach to education could be part of the answer. “We need to look at it as a means of regionalizing. It would serve us and it would serve the towns surrounding us,” said school. board President Carmen Rodriguez. If new schools serve Hartford and suburban stu- dents, she said, the state might pay more of the costs. Because school crowding in the city is so bad that children are literally spilling out of the classroom onto the playground, board of education members said the trade-off with the suburbs would have to be equal — for each suburban student who comes to the city, a city student would go to a suburban school. The specialized schools being discussed include high schools that would emphasize government and civics, commerce and in- dustry or science and technology. Each school would offer the basic core curriculum but include opportunities for special study in selected areas. “I think it’s a great idea,” said board member Candida Flores-Sepulveda. “I think it will address a number of issues that we have been working on for a long time.” A board committee is preparing a pro- posal that the city build or acquire at least eight — and possibly 10 — new schools as the school system grows from 26,000 to a pro- jected 29,000 students during the next 10 years. The proposal includes three small, specialized high schools; four middle schools; and one to three elementary schools. Some of the schools would be creat- ed by converting existing schools. Because the 31 existing schools need reno- vations and additions, the total price tag for the expansion could be as much as $300 Regional draw may be key Continued from Connecticut Page at that . .. as long as there were an equal number of slots [for Hartford students] being made available in the suburban communities,” board member Edward Carroll said of the regional school idea. Carroll is chair- man of the committee studying the school system’s space needs. Elizabeth Schmitt, a spokeswom-- an for the state Department of Edu- cation, said the state has paid the full construction costs of some so-called magnet schools in recent years. That is because they meet policy goals of promoting racial integration and ef- ficiency. Most students in Hartford schools are members of minority groups, while many nearby suburban towns have largely white student popula- tions. City schools are the subject of a lawsuit pending in Superior Court in Hartford that says the segregated schools are inferior and violate con- stitutional guarantees of an equal education. In some suburban communities, education leaders said they were in- terested in the Hartford idea. West Hartford school board Chair- man John Lemega called it “a tre- mendous idea.” “The notion sounds interesting. It’s got to be fleshed out,” said Le- mega. He also said there are other magnet school proposals, including one at the University of Hartford. “We are going to need radical alter- natives in education,” he said. Wethersfield Board of Education Chairwoman Irene G. Roushon was less enthusiastic, but said the key is building a school with a good reputa- tion. “If the parents don’t feel that the education in that specific area is superior, they are not going to buy it,” she said. : More Connecticut news on Page A12. million. The school board would like the state to pay as much of the cost as possible so city voters would be more inclined to ap- prove the plans. Board members are trying to determine how many new schools are needed. More discussion of what kinds of programs the schools will offer will come after the board submits its plans to the city council. City voters could consider a school-building pro- posal Election Day this year. “I think we would be very open to looking Please see Regional, Page D11 GGL Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 Non-Profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID Hartford, CT Permit No. 3699 HARTFORD Ron Se Lado Sd NAACP Legal Defense. JFund 99 Hudson Street New York, NY \V.10013 bolton diaablindsd