Letter from Quigley to Williams RE Update on Reapportionment Challenges; Newspaper Clipping
Correspondence
February 3, 1982
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Letter from Quigley to Williams RE Update on Reapportionment Challenges; Newspaper Clipping, 1982. bdd731b2-c703-ef11-a1fd-6045bddc4804. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/fb8d7ae6-acd2-48cf-b4b2-2c21764ea73a/letter-from-quigley-to-williams-re-update-on-reapportionment-challenges-newspaper-clipping. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
LAW OFFICES OF
QUIGLEY & SC HECKMAN
631 ST. CHA Ui
NEW ORLEANS, IANA 70130
TELEPHO
WILLIAM P. QUIGLEY IN ASSOCIATION WITH
STE VEN SCHECKMAN R. JAMES KELLOGG
February . MARK S. GOLDSTEIN
Mr. Napoleon B, Williams
Suite 203(
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
Dear Mr. Williams:
I am writing you to give you an update on the re-apportionment challenges here in
LLouisiana.
On Wednesday, January 27, 1982 we held a press conference to announce the filing
of our objections to the Congressional re-apportionment. There was a great deal of
news coverage of this. All the local networks carried stories on this at thelr 6:00
and 10:00 o'clock news programs. The local newspaper carried an article on this.
(Copy enclosed.) The story was also carried on the wire services and broadcast State-
wide.
Governor Treen was very upset when informed that one fF the basis of the objection
was an analysis of his past antagonism towards civil right: Normally an emotionless
man, Treen lost his temper and snapped at reporters in dismissing the arguments.
We have given serious thought to the idea of going to Washington, D.C. and
presenting our objections to the State House re-apportionment directly to Mr. Reynolds.
We feel that this is our strongest challenge and, if we had the opportunity to speak
with him directly, that we could create the best climate for getting an objection out
of the Justice Department, We would hope that you or Lani could help us arrange the
meeting and go with us at that time.
One of the major obstacles in the way of this idea is cost. Locally, our. fund
against illegal re-apportionment has never really gotten off the ground, and has not
yet been able to pay any of the costs incurred in this matter. By the time the House
comment is ready, we anticipate that we will have put out at least $1,000.00 in expenses
for the preparations of these two comments. Our office is unable to front any more
expenses like this at this time. We have checked with the Survival Coalition and they
feel they will be able to pay for Barbara Major to make the trip. We are confident that
onc of the State Legislators could find the resources to make the trip if you think it
would he a pood idea for them to come as well, | would appreciate it. if you could sce
if the Legal Defense Fund could help in this effort. We certainly appreciate the help
that you have given in making sure that Cordon Henderson will be paid for the work he
has done.
We have heard late word from the Justice Department that they are very interested
in examining the House of Representatives plan, the Congressional plan, and the plan
for the Senate with an eye toward very possibly opposing these re-apportionment plans.
Mr. Napoleon B. Williams
February 3, 1982
Page 2
With this in mind, I think the contact between some people from Louisiana and the
Justice Department is evermore important.
Thanks for your support in this matter and other matters and I look forward to
hearing from you.
Eincbr Sincerely,
i - 7
i ol
. . /
Jilliam Patrick Quiglgy
WPQ:mg
Enclosure
a
®
Papers against remap are filed
by 3 black N.O. lawmakers
By LOVELL REAULIEU
Three black New Orleans legislators Wednesday {iled opposition papers in Washington, D.C.. to the reappertionment plan of the U.S. House of Represen- tatives submitted to the U.S Justice Department last month.
The legislators - Diana Bajoie, Johnny Jackson Jr. and Jon Johnson sald the reapportionment plan adopted by the Louisiana House of Representa- tives dilutes black voting strength, which is a viola- * tion of the 1665 Voting Rights Act that was rec ently extended.
Jackson was the only one of the three
present at a news conference
“We're not saying to guarantee a black district,” he said, “only the opportunity to elect one
“The issue of fair representation must deal with
the racial 1Ssue, party politics and whether New
Orleans gets representation. It seems everybody's
interest was
Jackson sand
The redistricting was taken up in the fast legisla
legislators
taken into con aderation but our ow nv
tive
William Quigley, one of a team of attorneys along
with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund representing
the legislators, labeled the redistricting plan a “Don-
ald Duck” plan Quigley said a map showing the
district carved out illustrates the famous cartoon
character
“This plan (one submitted by Gov. David C. Treen)
has both the effect and the intent of diluting black
voter strength,” Quigley said
Quigley said Treen's actions were politically moti-
vated because Rep. Robert Livingston, a Republican
like the governar, must run for re-election this
November. He said a black majority district in New
Orleans would have a negative impact on Living
ston’s re-election efforts
“It is important to evaluate this action in light of
his other political actions.” Quigley said
Quigley added that the Opposition is not a lawsuit.
He said the Justice Department will review it and
session
RRR £29
has 60 days to determiife whether to accept of refet it.
In addition to the three legislators, a group known as the Survival Coalition is joining in the opposition. The group, represented by Barbara Major, clzaiihs to represent low- and moderate-income persons.
Al a news conference Wednesday, Treen was
asked about the redistricting matter and said, “This is the first I have heard of it.”
He said he would like to sce the content of the pretest before commenting “but if it is the same allegations as heretofore made, T think it is ground-
less.”
;
4
!
$
i