Greenberg Statement on Intent to Follow Supreme Court Miss. School Ruling with Additional Desegregation Suits
Press Release
October 31, 1969
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Greenberg Statement on Intent to Follow Supreme Court Miss. School Ruling with Additional Desegregation Suits, 1969. bf14cbcc-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ffa42ecd-bc18-417c-930b-4ad33033d129/greenberg-statement-on-intent-to-follow-supreme-court-miss-school-ruling-with-additional-desegregation-suits. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
eS
President
Hon. Francis E.
PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel
egal ‘efense und Jack Greenber;
Director, Public Relations NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Jesse DeVore, Jr. 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487
Statement by Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel,
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.,
10 Columbus Circle, New York, New York,
Friday, October 31, 1969, 11:00 a.m.
Staff attorneys who are responsible for more than 200 separate
southern integration cases across the South conferred here yesterday
and concluded that the LDF should follow up the Supreme Court's
Mississippi school ruling immediately.
Accordingly, we will file motions in 75 to 100 pending school
cases at the district court level. We will ask for immediate
integration. We will not wait for the close of the school year or
even until the end of the semester. Every southern state will be
affected.
Another of our 25 cases are on appeal from southern district
courts to the appeals court level. We will also move for immediate
integration in these.
We have 25 New York based attorneys and 250 cooperating lawyers
across the South. Although they have caseload responsibilities in
other areas of our program, our entire LDF legal and field educa-
tional staff will place special emphasis on breaking the back of
southern school resistance.
The President's statement yesterday in which he acknowledged
that the Court had spoken decisively and in which he said that the
Administration desires to help with "problems" arising from the
ruling is, of course, welcome. More welcome, however, would be--
and we hope that there soon will be forthcoming--a statement to the
effect that the law will be promptly and vigorously enforced and
that the full resources of the Department of Justice will be turned
to implementation.
Otherwise, the burden will fall upon Negro children, parents,
and the LDF. Our capacity, of course, is limited by the availability
of manpower and funds, particularly in an Administration dedicated
to law and order.
The implementation of unambiguous Supreme Court rulings should
be the first priority of government.
(more)
Statement by Jack Greenberg -2-+ October 31, 1969
This ruling has several particularly noteworthy aspects:
1. It ends segregated schools after a suit is filed without
lengthy court proceedings.
2. It lifts the burden from southern school administrators by
establishing a clear rule; they no longer have the option to delay
school desegregation, and segregationists therefore have no incentive
to try to force them to keep segregating.
3. The decision gives the LDF and the Department of Justice a
means of dealing with District Courts that refuse to enforce deseg-
regation by involving the Courts of Appeals in playing a greater
role of supervision in the desegregation process.
Pad It makes clear, once and for all, that this country is
unquestionably on the road to integration and that no momentary
political expediency will turn it around.
2305